What is this 4-propeller plane? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat is this weird plane?What aircraft is this?What type/model of plane is this?What is this plane?What are these small jets and large propeller aircraft flying in formation?What happened to this airplane at Lombok Airport?Can you identify this unusual plane by its description?What aircraft has a single constant orange light?What is this high-wing, single-propeller, possibly military plane?What plane model is this?
What did it mean to "align" a radio?
Am I thawing this London Broil safely?
Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
Falsification in Math vs Science
A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky
Delete all lines which don't have n characters before delimiter
Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?
Write faster on AT24C32
What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Resizing object distorts it (Illustrator CC 2018)
Is there a symbol for a right arrow with a square in the middle?
Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?
Worn-tile Scrabble
Loose spokes after only a few rides
Geography at the pixel level
Is a "Democratic" Oligarchy-Style System Possible?
Why can Shazam fly?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Return to UK after being refused entry years previously
What is this 4-propeller plane?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat is this weird plane?What aircraft is this?What type/model of plane is this?What is this plane?What are these small jets and large propeller aircraft flying in formation?What happened to this airplane at Lombok Airport?Can you identify this unusual plane by its description?What aircraft has a single constant orange light?What is this high-wing, single-propeller, possibly military plane?What plane model is this?
$begingroup$
My dad noticed it flying quite low today, sadly we do not have a better photo.
4-propellers and uniquely shaped tail assembly.
Plane was spotted in northern Poland, around 9.30AM, near border with Russia/Kaliningrad.
aircraft-identification
asked yesterday
Łukasz DanilukŁukasz Daniluk
17316
New contributor
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My dad noticed it flying quite low today, sadly we do not have a better photo.
4-propellers and uniquely shaped tail assembly.
Plane was spotted in northern Poland, around 9.30AM, near border with Russia/Kaliningrad.
aircraft-identification
asked yesterday
Łukasz DanilukŁukasz Daniluk
17316
New contributor
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Have a look at my answer - and especially the many images of each type of craft. I do not know the exact location but (see map in my answer) given the appearance and the various locations mentioned, the IL38 appears the more likely choice. I may be wrong, of course :-).
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
$begingroup$
See the map in my answer - can you identify the location at which the photo was taken and the direction that the photographer was facing.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
18 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My dad noticed it flying quite low today, sadly we do not have a better photo.
4-propellers and uniquely shaped tail assembly.
Plane was spotted in northern Poland, around 9.30AM, near border with Russia/Kaliningrad.
aircraft-identification
asked yesterday
Łukasz DanilukŁukasz Daniluk
17316
New contributor
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
My dad noticed it flying quite low today, sadly we do not have a better photo.
4-propellers and uniquely shaped tail assembly.
Plane was spotted in northern Poland, around 9.30AM, near border with Russia/Kaliningrad.
aircraft-identification
aircraft-identification
asked yesterday
Łukasz DanilukŁukasz Daniluk
17316
New contributor
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
Łukasz DanilukŁukasz Daniluk
17316
New contributor
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
Łukasz Daniluk
asked yesterday
Łukasz DanilukŁukasz Daniluk
17316
New contributor
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
Łukasz DanilukŁukasz Daniluk
17316
asked yesterday
Łukasz DanilukŁukasz Daniluk
17316
17316
New contributor
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Have a look at my answer - and especially the many images of each type of craft. I do not know the exact location but (see map in my answer) given the appearance and the various locations mentioned, the IL38 appears the more likely choice. I may be wrong, of course :-).
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
$begingroup$
See the map in my answer - can you identify the location at which the photo was taken and the direction that the photographer was facing.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
18 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Have a look at my answer - and especially the many images of each type of craft. I do not know the exact location but (see map in my answer) given the appearance and the various locations mentioned, the IL38 appears the more likely choice. I may be wrong, of course :-).
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
$begingroup$
See the map in my answer - can you identify the location at which the photo was taken and the direction that the photographer was facing.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have a look at my answer - and especially the many images of each type of craft. I do not know the exact location but (see map in my answer) given the appearance and the various locations mentioned, the IL38 appears the more likely choice. I may be wrong, of course :-).
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
$begingroup$
Have a look at my answer - and especially the many images of each type of craft. I do not know the exact location but (see map in my answer) given the appearance and the various locations mentioned, the IL38 appears the more likely choice. I may be wrong, of course :-).
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
$begingroup$
See the map in my answer - can you identify the location at which the photo was taken and the direction that the photographer was facing.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
See the map in my answer - can you identify the location at which the photo was taken and the direction that the photographer was facing.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
18 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Where you spotted it would help with probabilities.
However - the tail marks it out as a Maritime Patrol aircraft, of which the only low-wing 4-engine one is the P-3 Orion operated primarily by the US and Oz.
answered yesterday
RACRAC
2,58559
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Added time & location details to question, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Łukasz Daniluk
yesterday
7
$begingroup$
There's one other low-wing 4 engine maratime patrol aircraft, the Ilyushin Il-38. Although indeed this looks more like the P-3 Orion.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
10
$begingroup$
I think your answer would benefit from some information as to what exactly about the tail makes it obviously a maritime patrol aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
4
$begingroup$
@AlexanderKosubek Agreed. The MAD boom on the tail is there specifically for submarine hunting.
$endgroup$
– J...
yesterday
$begingroup$
For interest: I'd have suggested a P3 - New Zealand (where I live) also operates them although I believe they are about to be phased out.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
The fuselage extension at the back of the empennage is similar to that of a Lockheed P-3 Orion
answered yesterday
Dave GremlinDave Gremlin
1,033313
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While I personally would have thought it was an Orion P3 (as it resembles the Orions flown by the NZ airforce), I suggest that Sanchises suggestion of an Ilyushin IL38 (not II38) seems more likely. This is based on numerous online images of both craft 'at a distance' and the location. The wing shape appears (to me) more like that of the IL38, and one could 'pretend' (given the small image size) that the outer engines appeared somewhat smaller, as is the case with IL38's 'at a distance'.
The IL38 is or was operated by USSR/Russia and India.
Depending on how close the location was to the Russian border the aircraft may have been in Russian or Russian-Kaliningrad airspace. The latter would seem to be an entirely likely location for such an aircraft.
It is also entirely possible (and I have no knowledge either way) that Russia has overflight rights for military aircraft between Russia proper and the Kaliningrad exclave.
Apart from the US Navy (whose aircraft may turn up almost anywhere :-) ) none of the 18 operators of the P-3 are anywhere near the location noted. .
Many P3 Orion photos here
Many Ilyushin IL38 photos here
Here is an image of a US Navy P3 Orion.
It will be seen in many of the images linked above that from a distance the wings tend to appear slightly swept forward due to the larger rear root to tip taper compared to the leading edge taper.
________________________________
Here is a diagram of an IL-38
Looking at the many IL38 images linked above shows the wing to appear at a distance as thinner and squarer ended than a P3 Orion.
edited 16 hours ago
David Richerby
10.4k33679
answered yesterday
Russell McMahonRussell McMahon
1,014710
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I don't see the radar bulge though, which I think should show up even on the low quality picture.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Among the P-3 opeartors, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO, so could reasonably be flying near Kaliningrad. Amsterdam and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby the Netherlands haven't operated the P-3 for over a decade. The aircraft were given to Germany (for free).
$endgroup$
– jwenting
21 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@jwenting Thanks. I just followed the link in the answer, which said "operators", implying current. I've edited the answer to point to Wikipedia instead. Russell, could you please edit your claim about none of the operators except the USN being close? Germany is right next door. Germany, Greece, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO so could be flying over Poland. Berlin and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is, and Athens is only about 50km farther away.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Also, the aircraft was described as flying low so, unless it appeared very close to the border, it was probably on the Polish side. It's not like it was at 30,000ft and was 20 miles from the observer. And even if Russia does have overflight rights to reach Kaliningrad, they'd be over Lithuania and Belarus, not Poland. That seems unlikely anyway, since Lithuania is in NATO and Kaliningrad is accessible via the international waters of the Baltic.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62185%2fwhat-is-this-4-propeller-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Where you spotted it would help with probabilities.
However - the tail marks it out as a Maritime Patrol aircraft, of which the only low-wing 4-engine one is the P-3 Orion operated primarily by the US and Oz.
answered yesterday
RACRAC
2,58559
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Added time & location details to question, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Łukasz Daniluk
yesterday
7
$begingroup$
There's one other low-wing 4 engine maratime patrol aircraft, the Ilyushin Il-38. Although indeed this looks more like the P-3 Orion.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
10
$begingroup$
I think your answer would benefit from some information as to what exactly about the tail makes it obviously a maritime patrol aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
4
$begingroup$
@AlexanderKosubek Agreed. The MAD boom on the tail is there specifically for submarine hunting.
$endgroup$
– J...
yesterday
$begingroup$
For interest: I'd have suggested a P3 - New Zealand (where I live) also operates them although I believe they are about to be phased out.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Where you spotted it would help with probabilities.
However - the tail marks it out as a Maritime Patrol aircraft, of which the only low-wing 4-engine one is the P-3 Orion operated primarily by the US and Oz.
answered yesterday
RACRAC
2,58559
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Added time & location details to question, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Łukasz Daniluk
yesterday
7
$begingroup$
There's one other low-wing 4 engine maratime patrol aircraft, the Ilyushin Il-38. Although indeed this looks more like the P-3 Orion.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
10
$begingroup$
I think your answer would benefit from some information as to what exactly about the tail makes it obviously a maritime patrol aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
4
$begingroup$
@AlexanderKosubek Agreed. The MAD boom on the tail is there specifically for submarine hunting.
$endgroup$
– J...
yesterday
$begingroup$
For interest: I'd have suggested a P3 - New Zealand (where I live) also operates them although I believe they are about to be phased out.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Where you spotted it would help with probabilities.
However - the tail marks it out as a Maritime Patrol aircraft, of which the only low-wing 4-engine one is the P-3 Orion operated primarily by the US and Oz.
answered yesterday
RACRAC
2,58559
$endgroup$
Where you spotted it would help with probabilities.
However - the tail marks it out as a Maritime Patrol aircraft, of which the only low-wing 4-engine one is the P-3 Orion operated primarily by the US and Oz.
answered yesterday
RACRAC
2,58559
answered yesterday
RACRAC
2,58559
answered yesterday
RACRAC
2,58559
answered yesterday
RACRAC
2,58559
2,58559
$begingroup$
Added time & location details to question, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Łukasz Daniluk
yesterday
7
$begingroup$
There's one other low-wing 4 engine maratime patrol aircraft, the Ilyushin Il-38. Although indeed this looks more like the P-3 Orion.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
10
$begingroup$
I think your answer would benefit from some information as to what exactly about the tail makes it obviously a maritime patrol aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
4
$begingroup$
@AlexanderKosubek Agreed. The MAD boom on the tail is there specifically for submarine hunting.
$endgroup$
– J...
yesterday
$begingroup$
For interest: I'd have suggested a P3 - New Zealand (where I live) also operates them although I believe they are about to be phased out.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Added time & location details to question, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Łukasz Daniluk
yesterday
7
$begingroup$
There's one other low-wing 4 engine maratime patrol aircraft, the Ilyushin Il-38. Although indeed this looks more like the P-3 Orion.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
10
$begingroup$
I think your answer would benefit from some information as to what exactly about the tail makes it obviously a maritime patrol aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
4
$begingroup$
@AlexanderKosubek Agreed. The MAD boom on the tail is there specifically for submarine hunting.
$endgroup$
– J...
yesterday
$begingroup$
For interest: I'd have suggested a P3 - New Zealand (where I live) also operates them although I believe they are about to be phased out.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
$begingroup$
Added time & location details to question, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Łukasz Daniluk
yesterday
$begingroup$
Added time & location details to question, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Łukasz Daniluk
yesterday
7
7
$begingroup$
There's one other low-wing 4 engine maratime patrol aircraft, the Ilyushin Il-38. Although indeed this looks more like the P-3 Orion.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
$begingroup$
There's one other low-wing 4 engine maratime patrol aircraft, the Ilyushin Il-38. Although indeed this looks more like the P-3 Orion.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
10
10
$begingroup$
I think your answer would benefit from some information as to what exactly about the tail makes it obviously a maritime patrol aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think your answer would benefit from some information as to what exactly about the tail makes it obviously a maritime patrol aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Alexander Kosubek
yesterday
4
4
$begingroup$
@AlexanderKosubek Agreed. The MAD boom on the tail is there specifically for submarine hunting.
$endgroup$
– J...
yesterday
$begingroup$
@AlexanderKosubek Agreed. The MAD boom on the tail is there specifically for submarine hunting.
$endgroup$
– J...
yesterday
$begingroup$
For interest: I'd have suggested a P3 - New Zealand (where I live) also operates them although I believe they are about to be phased out.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
$begingroup$
For interest: I'd have suggested a P3 - New Zealand (where I live) also operates them although I believe they are about to be phased out.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
The fuselage extension at the back of the empennage is similar to that of a Lockheed P-3 Orion
answered yesterday
Dave GremlinDave Gremlin
1,033313
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fuselage extension at the back of the empennage is similar to that of a Lockheed P-3 Orion
answered yesterday
Dave GremlinDave Gremlin
1,033313
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fuselage extension at the back of the empennage is similar to that of a Lockheed P-3 Orion
answered yesterday
Dave GremlinDave Gremlin
1,033313
$endgroup$
The fuselage extension at the back of the empennage is similar to that of a Lockheed P-3 Orion
answered yesterday
Dave GremlinDave Gremlin
1,033313
answered yesterday
Dave GremlinDave Gremlin
1,033313
answered yesterday
Dave GremlinDave Gremlin
1,033313
answered yesterday
Dave GremlinDave Gremlin
1,033313
1,033313
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While I personally would have thought it was an Orion P3 (as it resembles the Orions flown by the NZ airforce), I suggest that Sanchises suggestion of an Ilyushin IL38 (not II38) seems more likely. This is based on numerous online images of both craft 'at a distance' and the location. The wing shape appears (to me) more like that of the IL38, and one could 'pretend' (given the small image size) that the outer engines appeared somewhat smaller, as is the case with IL38's 'at a distance'.
The IL38 is or was operated by USSR/Russia and India.
Depending on how close the location was to the Russian border the aircraft may have been in Russian or Russian-Kaliningrad airspace. The latter would seem to be an entirely likely location for such an aircraft.
It is also entirely possible (and I have no knowledge either way) that Russia has overflight rights for military aircraft between Russia proper and the Kaliningrad exclave.
Apart from the US Navy (whose aircraft may turn up almost anywhere :-) ) none of the 18 operators of the P-3 are anywhere near the location noted. .
Many P3 Orion photos here
Many Ilyushin IL38 photos here
Here is an image of a US Navy P3 Orion.
It will be seen in many of the images linked above that from a distance the wings tend to appear slightly swept forward due to the larger rear root to tip taper compared to the leading edge taper.
________________________________
Here is a diagram of an IL-38
Looking at the many IL38 images linked above shows the wing to appear at a distance as thinner and squarer ended than a P3 Orion.
edited 16 hours ago
David Richerby
10.4k33679
answered yesterday
Russell McMahonRussell McMahon
1,014710
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I don't see the radar bulge though, which I think should show up even on the low quality picture.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Among the P-3 opeartors, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO, so could reasonably be flying near Kaliningrad. Amsterdam and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby the Netherlands haven't operated the P-3 for over a decade. The aircraft were given to Germany (for free).
$endgroup$
– jwenting
21 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@jwenting Thanks. I just followed the link in the answer, which said "operators", implying current. I've edited the answer to point to Wikipedia instead. Russell, could you please edit your claim about none of the operators except the USN being close? Germany is right next door. Germany, Greece, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO so could be flying over Poland. Berlin and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is, and Athens is only about 50km farther away.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Also, the aircraft was described as flying low so, unless it appeared very close to the border, it was probably on the Polish side. It's not like it was at 30,000ft and was 20 miles from the observer. And even if Russia does have overflight rights to reach Kaliningrad, they'd be over Lithuania and Belarus, not Poland. That seems unlikely anyway, since Lithuania is in NATO and Kaliningrad is accessible via the international waters of the Baltic.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
While I personally would have thought it was an Orion P3 (as it resembles the Orions flown by the NZ airforce), I suggest that Sanchises suggestion of an Ilyushin IL38 (not II38) seems more likely. This is based on numerous online images of both craft 'at a distance' and the location. The wing shape appears (to me) more like that of the IL38, and one could 'pretend' (given the small image size) that the outer engines appeared somewhat smaller, as is the case with IL38's 'at a distance'.
The IL38 is or was operated by USSR/Russia and India.
Depending on how close the location was to the Russian border the aircraft may have been in Russian or Russian-Kaliningrad airspace. The latter would seem to be an entirely likely location for such an aircraft.
It is also entirely possible (and I have no knowledge either way) that Russia has overflight rights for military aircraft between Russia proper and the Kaliningrad exclave.
Apart from the US Navy (whose aircraft may turn up almost anywhere :-) ) none of the 18 operators of the P-3 are anywhere near the location noted. .
Many P3 Orion photos here
Many Ilyushin IL38 photos here
Here is an image of a US Navy P3 Orion.
It will be seen in many of the images linked above that from a distance the wings tend to appear slightly swept forward due to the larger rear root to tip taper compared to the leading edge taper.
________________________________
Here is a diagram of an IL-38
Looking at the many IL38 images linked above shows the wing to appear at a distance as thinner and squarer ended than a P3 Orion.
edited 16 hours ago
David Richerby
10.4k33679
answered yesterday
Russell McMahonRussell McMahon
1,014710
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I don't see the radar bulge though, which I think should show up even on the low quality picture.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Among the P-3 opeartors, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO, so could reasonably be flying near Kaliningrad. Amsterdam and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby the Netherlands haven't operated the P-3 for over a decade. The aircraft were given to Germany (for free).
$endgroup$
– jwenting
21 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@jwenting Thanks. I just followed the link in the answer, which said "operators", implying current. I've edited the answer to point to Wikipedia instead. Russell, could you please edit your claim about none of the operators except the USN being close? Germany is right next door. Germany, Greece, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO so could be flying over Poland. Berlin and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is, and Athens is only about 50km farther away.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Also, the aircraft was described as flying low so, unless it appeared very close to the border, it was probably on the Polish side. It's not like it was at 30,000ft and was 20 miles from the observer. And even if Russia does have overflight rights to reach Kaliningrad, they'd be over Lithuania and Belarus, not Poland. That seems unlikely anyway, since Lithuania is in NATO and Kaliningrad is accessible via the international waters of the Baltic.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
While I personally would have thought it was an Orion P3 (as it resembles the Orions flown by the NZ airforce), I suggest that Sanchises suggestion of an Ilyushin IL38 (not II38) seems more likely. This is based on numerous online images of both craft 'at a distance' and the location. The wing shape appears (to me) more like that of the IL38, and one could 'pretend' (given the small image size) that the outer engines appeared somewhat smaller, as is the case with IL38's 'at a distance'.
The IL38 is or was operated by USSR/Russia and India.
Depending on how close the location was to the Russian border the aircraft may have been in Russian or Russian-Kaliningrad airspace. The latter would seem to be an entirely likely location for such an aircraft.
It is also entirely possible (and I have no knowledge either way) that Russia has overflight rights for military aircraft between Russia proper and the Kaliningrad exclave.
Apart from the US Navy (whose aircraft may turn up almost anywhere :-) ) none of the 18 operators of the P-3 are anywhere near the location noted. .
Many P3 Orion photos here
Many Ilyushin IL38 photos here
Here is an image of a US Navy P3 Orion.
It will be seen in many of the images linked above that from a distance the wings tend to appear slightly swept forward due to the larger rear root to tip taper compared to the leading edge taper.
________________________________
Here is a diagram of an IL-38
Looking at the many IL38 images linked above shows the wing to appear at a distance as thinner and squarer ended than a P3 Orion.
edited 16 hours ago
David Richerby
10.4k33679
answered yesterday
Russell McMahonRussell McMahon
1,014710
$endgroup$
While I personally would have thought it was an Orion P3 (as it resembles the Orions flown by the NZ airforce), I suggest that Sanchises suggestion of an Ilyushin IL38 (not II38) seems more likely. This is based on numerous online images of both craft 'at a distance' and the location. The wing shape appears (to me) more like that of the IL38, and one could 'pretend' (given the small image size) that the outer engines appeared somewhat smaller, as is the case with IL38's 'at a distance'.
The IL38 is or was operated by USSR/Russia and India.
Depending on how close the location was to the Russian border the aircraft may have been in Russian or Russian-Kaliningrad airspace. The latter would seem to be an entirely likely location for such an aircraft.
It is also entirely possible (and I have no knowledge either way) that Russia has overflight rights for military aircraft between Russia proper and the Kaliningrad exclave.
Apart from the US Navy (whose aircraft may turn up almost anywhere :-) ) none of the 18 operators of the P-3 are anywhere near the location noted. .
Many P3 Orion photos here
Many Ilyushin IL38 photos here
Here is an image of a US Navy P3 Orion.
It will be seen in many of the images linked above that from a distance the wings tend to appear slightly swept forward due to the larger rear root to tip taper compared to the leading edge taper.
________________________________
Here is a diagram of an IL-38
Looking at the many IL38 images linked above shows the wing to appear at a distance as thinner and squarer ended than a P3 Orion.
edited 16 hours ago
David Richerby
10.4k33679
answered yesterday
Russell McMahonRussell McMahon
1,014710
edited 16 hours ago
David Richerby
10.4k33679
edited 16 hours ago
David Richerby
10.4k33679
edited 16 hours ago
David Richerby
10.4k33679
10.4k33679
answered yesterday
Russell McMahonRussell McMahon
1,014710
answered yesterday
Russell McMahonRussell McMahon
1,014710
answered yesterday
Russell McMahonRussell McMahon
1,014710
1,014710
1
$begingroup$
I don't see the radar bulge though, which I think should show up even on the low quality picture.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Among the P-3 opeartors, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO, so could reasonably be flying near Kaliningrad. Amsterdam and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby the Netherlands haven't operated the P-3 for over a decade. The aircraft were given to Germany (for free).
$endgroup$
– jwenting
21 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@jwenting Thanks. I just followed the link in the answer, which said "operators", implying current. I've edited the answer to point to Wikipedia instead. Russell, could you please edit your claim about none of the operators except the USN being close? Germany is right next door. Germany, Greece, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO so could be flying over Poland. Berlin and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is, and Athens is only about 50km farther away.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Also, the aircraft was described as flying low so, unless it appeared very close to the border, it was probably on the Polish side. It's not like it was at 30,000ft and was 20 miles from the observer. And even if Russia does have overflight rights to reach Kaliningrad, they'd be over Lithuania and Belarus, not Poland. That seems unlikely anyway, since Lithuania is in NATO and Kaliningrad is accessible via the international waters of the Baltic.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
I don't see the radar bulge though, which I think should show up even on the low quality picture.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Among the P-3 opeartors, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO, so could reasonably be flying near Kaliningrad. Amsterdam and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby the Netherlands haven't operated the P-3 for over a decade. The aircraft were given to Germany (for free).
$endgroup$
– jwenting
21 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@jwenting Thanks. I just followed the link in the answer, which said "operators", implying current. I've edited the answer to point to Wikipedia instead. Russell, could you please edit your claim about none of the operators except the USN being close? Germany is right next door. Germany, Greece, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO so could be flying over Poland. Berlin and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is, and Athens is only about 50km farther away.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Also, the aircraft was described as flying low so, unless it appeared very close to the border, it was probably on the Polish side. It's not like it was at 30,000ft and was 20 miles from the observer. And even if Russia does have overflight rights to reach Kaliningrad, they'd be over Lithuania and Belarus, not Poland. That seems unlikely anyway, since Lithuania is in NATO and Kaliningrad is accessible via the international waters of the Baltic.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I don't see the radar bulge though, which I think should show up even on the low quality picture.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
$begingroup$
I don't see the radar bulge though, which I think should show up even on the low quality picture.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
Among the P-3 opeartors, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO, so could reasonably be flying near Kaliningrad. Amsterdam and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
$begingroup$
Among the P-3 opeartors, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO, so could reasonably be flying near Kaliningrad. Amsterdam and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby the Netherlands haven't operated the P-3 for over a decade. The aircraft were given to Germany (for free).
$endgroup$
– jwenting
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby the Netherlands haven't operated the P-3 for over a decade. The aircraft were given to Germany (for free).
$endgroup$
– jwenting
21 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@jwenting Thanks. I just followed the link in the answer, which said "operators", implying current. I've edited the answer to point to Wikipedia instead. Russell, could you please edit your claim about none of the operators except the USN being close? Germany is right next door. Germany, Greece, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO so could be flying over Poland. Berlin and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is, and Athens is only about 50km farther away.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
@jwenting Thanks. I just followed the link in the answer, which said "operators", implying current. I've edited the answer to point to Wikipedia instead. Russell, could you please edit your claim about none of the operators except the USN being close? Germany is right next door. Germany, Greece, Norway, Portugal and Spain are all in NATO so could be flying over Poland. Berlin and Oslo are closer to Kaliningrad than Moscow is, and Athens is only about 50km farther away.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Also, the aircraft was described as flying low so, unless it appeared very close to the border, it was probably on the Polish side. It's not like it was at 30,000ft and was 20 miles from the observer. And even if Russia does have overflight rights to reach Kaliningrad, they'd be over Lithuania and Belarus, not Poland. That seems unlikely anyway, since Lithuania is in NATO and Kaliningrad is accessible via the international waters of the Baltic.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also, the aircraft was described as flying low so, unless it appeared very close to the border, it was probably on the Polish side. It's not like it was at 30,000ft and was 20 miles from the observer. And even if Russia does have overflight rights to reach Kaliningrad, they'd be over Lithuania and Belarus, not Poland. That seems unlikely anyway, since Lithuania is in NATO and Kaliningrad is accessible via the international waters of the Baltic.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Łukasz Daniluk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62185%2fwhat-is-this-4-propeller-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Have a look at my answer - and especially the many images of each type of craft. I do not know the exact location but (see map in my answer) given the appearance and the various locations mentioned, the IL38 appears the more likely choice. I may be wrong, of course :-).
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
yesterday
$begingroup$
See the map in my answer - can you identify the location at which the photo was taken and the direction that the photographer was facing.
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
18 hours ago