How was Peter Parker able to use EDITH in the end?How exactly was Aunt May related to Peter Parker?How was Iron Man able to return at the end of the Avengers movie?After Peter Parker was bitten, what happened to the rest of the radioactive spiders?What happened to the spider that bit Peter Parker?Possible literary character influences for Peter ParkerHow does Peter Parker get to school?Why couldn't Peter use his suit at the endHow old does Peter Parker get?Did Peter Parker always attend Midtown High School?Why was Peter's “Peter Tingle” not working at the start of the events of “Far From Home”?
Vertical tennis ball into fancy new enumerate
How to get CPU-G to run on 18.04
Did the meaning of "significant" change in the 20th century?
How do I stop my characters falling in love?
Why do all my history books divide Chinese history after the Han dynasty?
How to apply the changes to my `.zshrc` file after edit?
Is there a wealth gap in Boston where the median net worth of white households is $247,500 while the median net worth for black families was $8?
Character is called by their first initial. How do I write it?
Use cases for M-0 & C-0?
What do I do with a party that is much stronger than their level?
How did Mysterio have these drones?
Isolated audio without a transformer
Why force the nose of 737 Max down in the first place?
Melee or Ranged attacks by Monsters, no distinction in modifiers?
Old French song lyrics with the word "baiser."
How do I explain an exponentially complex intuitively?
Writing a clean implementation of rock–paper–scissors game in C++
Can anyone give a concrete example to illustrate what is an uniform prior?
Could the rotation of a black hole cause other planets to rotate?
How to avoid theft of potentially patentable IP when trying to obtain a Ph.D?
Is it legal to use cash pulled from a credit card to pay the monthly payment on that credit card?
Is it legal for private citizens to "impound" e-scooters?
How can religions be structured in ways that allow inter-faith councils to work?
Which approach can I use to generate text based on multiple inputs?
How was Peter Parker able to use EDITH in the end?
How exactly was Aunt May related to Peter Parker?How was Iron Man able to return at the end of the Avengers movie?After Peter Parker was bitten, what happened to the rest of the radioactive spiders?What happened to the spider that bit Peter Parker?Possible literary character influences for Peter ParkerHow does Peter Parker get to school?Why couldn't Peter use his suit at the endHow old does Peter Parker get?Did Peter Parker always attend Midtown High School?Why was Peter's “Peter Tingle” not working at the start of the events of “Far From Home”?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Now, I could easily be missing a detail here, but my understanding is that the following steps occurred (obvious spoilers):
- Peter gets EDITH and "registers" himself using the glasses.
- Peter 'befriends' Beck and determines he's better suited to use EDITH. Peter transfers full control of EDITH to Beck.
- Betrayal and shenanigans from Beck/Mysterio ensues, ending with Beck's death.
- Peter takes back control of EDITH somehow (and without any indication of a transfer of control?) and orders them to abort.
How was #4 possible given the fact that Peter gave up control? I wouldn't have assumed they could both have control, since Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it, unless Peter (in)conveniently forgot/didn't know up until the very end. The best guess I have is that control fell back to Peter after Beck's death somehow, but I have no proof.
I've seen a couple of posts on other sites, but they all seem like conjecture and speculation. Nothing official.
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe spider-man-far-from-home
asked Jul 17 at 20:28
Broots WaymbBroots Waymb
1,0172 gold badges15 silver badges28 bronze badges
add a comment |
Now, I could easily be missing a detail here, but my understanding is that the following steps occurred (obvious spoilers):
- Peter gets EDITH and "registers" himself using the glasses.
- Peter 'befriends' Beck and determines he's better suited to use EDITH. Peter transfers full control of EDITH to Beck.
- Betrayal and shenanigans from Beck/Mysterio ensues, ending with Beck's death.
- Peter takes back control of EDITH somehow (and without any indication of a transfer of control?) and orders them to abort.
How was #4 possible given the fact that Peter gave up control? I wouldn't have assumed they could both have control, since Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it, unless Peter (in)conveniently forgot/didn't know up until the very end. The best guess I have is that control fell back to Peter after Beck's death somehow, but I have no proof.
I've seen a couple of posts on other sites, but they all seem like conjecture and speculation. Nothing official.
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe spider-man-far-from-home
asked Jul 17 at 20:28
Broots WaymbBroots Waymb
1,0172 gold badges15 silver badges28 bronze badges
1
movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…
– Raj
Jul 17 at 20:33
1
@Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.
– Broots Waymb
Jul 17 at 20:36
2
The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?
– Harry Johnston
Jul 17 at 21:27
1
“Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it” — yup. As @HarryJohnston alludes to, EDITH seems to verify Peter earlier in the movie by doing some sort of scan of his face. Presumably the authentication that enables Peter to take control of the glasses requires him to be wearing them.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 18 at 9:02
add a comment |
Now, I could easily be missing a detail here, but my understanding is that the following steps occurred (obvious spoilers):
- Peter gets EDITH and "registers" himself using the glasses.
- Peter 'befriends' Beck and determines he's better suited to use EDITH. Peter transfers full control of EDITH to Beck.
- Betrayal and shenanigans from Beck/Mysterio ensues, ending with Beck's death.
- Peter takes back control of EDITH somehow (and without any indication of a transfer of control?) and orders them to abort.
How was #4 possible given the fact that Peter gave up control? I wouldn't have assumed they could both have control, since Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it, unless Peter (in)conveniently forgot/didn't know up until the very end. The best guess I have is that control fell back to Peter after Beck's death somehow, but I have no proof.
I've seen a couple of posts on other sites, but they all seem like conjecture and speculation. Nothing official.
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe spider-man-far-from-home
asked Jul 17 at 20:28
Broots WaymbBroots Waymb
1,0172 gold badges15 silver badges28 bronze badges
Now, I could easily be missing a detail here, but my understanding is that the following steps occurred (obvious spoilers):
- Peter gets EDITH and "registers" himself using the glasses.
- Peter 'befriends' Beck and determines he's better suited to use EDITH. Peter transfers full control of EDITH to Beck.
- Betrayal and shenanigans from Beck/Mysterio ensues, ending with Beck's death.
- Peter takes back control of EDITH somehow (and without any indication of a transfer of control?) and orders them to abort.
How was #4 possible given the fact that Peter gave up control? I wouldn't have assumed they could both have control, since Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it, unless Peter (in)conveniently forgot/didn't know up until the very end. The best guess I have is that control fell back to Peter after Beck's death somehow, but I have no proof.
I've seen a couple of posts on other sites, but they all seem like conjecture and speculation. Nothing official.
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe spider-man-far-from-home
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe spider-man-far-from-home
asked Jul 17 at 20:28
Broots WaymbBroots Waymb
1,0172 gold badges15 silver badges28 bronze badges
asked Jul 17 at 20:28
Broots WaymbBroots Waymb
1,0172 gold badges15 silver badges28 bronze badges
asked Jul 17 at 20:28
Broots WaymbBroots Waymb
1,0172 gold badges15 silver badges28 bronze badges
asked Jul 17 at 20:28
Broots WaymbBroots Waymb
1,0172 gold badges15 silver badges28 bronze badges
asked Jul 17 at 20:28
Broots WaymbBroots Waymb
1,0172 gold badges15 silver badges28 bronze badges
1,0172 gold badges15 silver badges28 bronze badges
1
movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…
– Raj
Jul 17 at 20:33
1
@Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.
– Broots Waymb
Jul 17 at 20:36
2
The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?
– Harry Johnston
Jul 17 at 21:27
1
“Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it” — yup. As @HarryJohnston alludes to, EDITH seems to verify Peter earlier in the movie by doing some sort of scan of his face. Presumably the authentication that enables Peter to take control of the glasses requires him to be wearing them.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 18 at 9:02
add a comment |
1
movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…
– Raj
Jul 17 at 20:33
1
@Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.
– Broots Waymb
Jul 17 at 20:36
2
The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?
– Harry Johnston
Jul 17 at 21:27
1
“Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it” — yup. As @HarryJohnston alludes to, EDITH seems to verify Peter earlier in the movie by doing some sort of scan of his face. Presumably the authentication that enables Peter to take control of the glasses requires him to be wearing them.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 18 at 9:02
1
1
movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…
– Raj
Jul 17 at 20:33
movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…
– Raj
Jul 17 at 20:33
1
1
@Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.
– Broots Waymb
Jul 17 at 20:36
@Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.
– Broots Waymb
Jul 17 at 20:36
2
2
The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?
– Harry Johnston
Jul 17 at 21:27
The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?
– Harry Johnston
Jul 17 at 21:27
1
1
“Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it” — yup. As @HarryJohnston alludes to, EDITH seems to verify Peter earlier in the movie by doing some sort of scan of his face. Presumably the authentication that enables Peter to take control of the glasses requires him to be wearing them.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 18 at 9:02
“Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it” — yup. As @HarryJohnston alludes to, EDITH seems to verify Peter earlier in the movie by doing some sort of scan of his face. Presumably the authentication that enables Peter to take control of the glasses requires him to be wearing them.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 18 at 9:02
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I can’t offer anything official on this, as far as I know there isn’t anything yet, but speculation offers up the most probable explanation.
Whilst Peter does “transfer” ownership to Beck EDITH only adds Beck as a user and doesn’t remove Peter from the system. This can be reasoned as Tony himself had to add Peter and presumably kept ownership himself in case he did survive the Time Heist and Battle for Earth saving an awkward conversation where he gives Peter the glasses then asks him to transfer ownership back.
As for why it didn’t transfer full ownership but rather only added Beck it seems to be a fail safe option. I bet Tony wouldn’t want anyone else to be able to take EDITH and lock him out of the system. So he probably did the same thing for Peter considering the glasses were only given to him upon his death.
It’s worth noting that Peter is able to use EDITH before Beck dies so that rules out one of your possible theories.
answered Jul 17 at 20:47
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
70.1k29 gold badges455 silver badges499 bronze badges
Until/unless something official comes along, this makes the most sense to me. I suppose it's just like adding another user account to a computer; the other user is not deleted in the process. And good point with Peter using it before Beck died - I knew I wouldn't get the details 100% right :)
– Broots Waymb
Jul 18 at 12:46
Also, it's probable that Beck isn't dead. Because superheros and $$$.
– ThePopMachine
Jul 18 at 16:32
@ThePopMachine Sure we never see him dead only dying and with the illusion tech anything is possible. I think barring any other evidence though at the moment we have to assume he is dead.
– TheLethalCarrot
Jul 18 at 16:33
Beck isn't dead for sure, he might appear in coming disney+ series
– Vikas Yadav
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216155%2fhow-was-peter-parker-able-to-use-edith-in-the-end%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I can’t offer anything official on this, as far as I know there isn’t anything yet, but speculation offers up the most probable explanation.
Whilst Peter does “transfer” ownership to Beck EDITH only adds Beck as a user and doesn’t remove Peter from the system. This can be reasoned as Tony himself had to add Peter and presumably kept ownership himself in case he did survive the Time Heist and Battle for Earth saving an awkward conversation where he gives Peter the glasses then asks him to transfer ownership back.
As for why it didn’t transfer full ownership but rather only added Beck it seems to be a fail safe option. I bet Tony wouldn’t want anyone else to be able to take EDITH and lock him out of the system. So he probably did the same thing for Peter considering the glasses were only given to him upon his death.
It’s worth noting that Peter is able to use EDITH before Beck dies so that rules out one of your possible theories.
answered Jul 17 at 20:47
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
70.1k29 gold badges455 silver badges499 bronze badges
Until/unless something official comes along, this makes the most sense to me. I suppose it's just like adding another user account to a computer; the other user is not deleted in the process. And good point with Peter using it before Beck died - I knew I wouldn't get the details 100% right :)
– Broots Waymb
Jul 18 at 12:46
Also, it's probable that Beck isn't dead. Because superheros and $$$.
– ThePopMachine
Jul 18 at 16:32
@ThePopMachine Sure we never see him dead only dying and with the illusion tech anything is possible. I think barring any other evidence though at the moment we have to assume he is dead.
– TheLethalCarrot
Jul 18 at 16:33
Beck isn't dead for sure, he might appear in coming disney+ series
– Vikas Yadav
2 days ago
add a comment |
I can’t offer anything official on this, as far as I know there isn’t anything yet, but speculation offers up the most probable explanation.
Whilst Peter does “transfer” ownership to Beck EDITH only adds Beck as a user and doesn’t remove Peter from the system. This can be reasoned as Tony himself had to add Peter and presumably kept ownership himself in case he did survive the Time Heist and Battle for Earth saving an awkward conversation where he gives Peter the glasses then asks him to transfer ownership back.
As for why it didn’t transfer full ownership but rather only added Beck it seems to be a fail safe option. I bet Tony wouldn’t want anyone else to be able to take EDITH and lock him out of the system. So he probably did the same thing for Peter considering the glasses were only given to him upon his death.
It’s worth noting that Peter is able to use EDITH before Beck dies so that rules out one of your possible theories.
answered Jul 17 at 20:47
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
70.1k29 gold badges455 silver badges499 bronze badges
Until/unless something official comes along, this makes the most sense to me. I suppose it's just like adding another user account to a computer; the other user is not deleted in the process. And good point with Peter using it before Beck died - I knew I wouldn't get the details 100% right :)
– Broots Waymb
Jul 18 at 12:46
Also, it's probable that Beck isn't dead. Because superheros and $$$.
– ThePopMachine
Jul 18 at 16:32
@ThePopMachine Sure we never see him dead only dying and with the illusion tech anything is possible. I think barring any other evidence though at the moment we have to assume he is dead.
– TheLethalCarrot
Jul 18 at 16:33
Beck isn't dead for sure, he might appear in coming disney+ series
– Vikas Yadav
2 days ago
add a comment |
I can’t offer anything official on this, as far as I know there isn’t anything yet, but speculation offers up the most probable explanation.
Whilst Peter does “transfer” ownership to Beck EDITH only adds Beck as a user and doesn’t remove Peter from the system. This can be reasoned as Tony himself had to add Peter and presumably kept ownership himself in case he did survive the Time Heist and Battle for Earth saving an awkward conversation where he gives Peter the glasses then asks him to transfer ownership back.
As for why it didn’t transfer full ownership but rather only added Beck it seems to be a fail safe option. I bet Tony wouldn’t want anyone else to be able to take EDITH and lock him out of the system. So he probably did the same thing for Peter considering the glasses were only given to him upon his death.
It’s worth noting that Peter is able to use EDITH before Beck dies so that rules out one of your possible theories.
answered Jul 17 at 20:47
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
70.1k29 gold badges455 silver badges499 bronze badges
I can’t offer anything official on this, as far as I know there isn’t anything yet, but speculation offers up the most probable explanation.
Whilst Peter does “transfer” ownership to Beck EDITH only adds Beck as a user and doesn’t remove Peter from the system. This can be reasoned as Tony himself had to add Peter and presumably kept ownership himself in case he did survive the Time Heist and Battle for Earth saving an awkward conversation where he gives Peter the glasses then asks him to transfer ownership back.
As for why it didn’t transfer full ownership but rather only added Beck it seems to be a fail safe option. I bet Tony wouldn’t want anyone else to be able to take EDITH and lock him out of the system. So he probably did the same thing for Peter considering the glasses were only given to him upon his death.
It’s worth noting that Peter is able to use EDITH before Beck dies so that rules out one of your possible theories.
answered Jul 17 at 20:47
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
70.1k29 gold badges455 silver badges499 bronze badges
answered Jul 17 at 20:47
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
70.1k29 gold badges455 silver badges499 bronze badges
answered Jul 17 at 20:47
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
70.1k29 gold badges455 silver badges499 bronze badges
answered Jul 17 at 20:47
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
70.1k29 gold badges455 silver badges499 bronze badges
70.1k29 gold badges455 silver badges499 bronze badges
Until/unless something official comes along, this makes the most sense to me. I suppose it's just like adding another user account to a computer; the other user is not deleted in the process. And good point with Peter using it before Beck died - I knew I wouldn't get the details 100% right :)
– Broots Waymb
Jul 18 at 12:46
Also, it's probable that Beck isn't dead. Because superheros and $$$.
– ThePopMachine
Jul 18 at 16:32
@ThePopMachine Sure we never see him dead only dying and with the illusion tech anything is possible. I think barring any other evidence though at the moment we have to assume he is dead.
– TheLethalCarrot
Jul 18 at 16:33
Beck isn't dead for sure, he might appear in coming disney+ series
– Vikas Yadav
2 days ago
add a comment |
Until/unless something official comes along, this makes the most sense to me. I suppose it's just like adding another user account to a computer; the other user is not deleted in the process. And good point with Peter using it before Beck died - I knew I wouldn't get the details 100% right :)
– Broots Waymb
Jul 18 at 12:46
Also, it's probable that Beck isn't dead. Because superheros and $$$.
– ThePopMachine
Jul 18 at 16:32
@ThePopMachine Sure we never see him dead only dying and with the illusion tech anything is possible. I think barring any other evidence though at the moment we have to assume he is dead.
– TheLethalCarrot
Jul 18 at 16:33
Beck isn't dead for sure, he might appear in coming disney+ series
– Vikas Yadav
2 days ago
Until/unless something official comes along, this makes the most sense to me. I suppose it's just like adding another user account to a computer; the other user is not deleted in the process. And good point with Peter using it before Beck died - I knew I wouldn't get the details 100% right :)
– Broots Waymb
Jul 18 at 12:46
Until/unless something official comes along, this makes the most sense to me. I suppose it's just like adding another user account to a computer; the other user is not deleted in the process. And good point with Peter using it before Beck died - I knew I wouldn't get the details 100% right :)
– Broots Waymb
Jul 18 at 12:46
Also, it's probable that Beck isn't dead. Because superheros and $$$.
– ThePopMachine
Jul 18 at 16:32
Also, it's probable that Beck isn't dead. Because superheros and $$$.
– ThePopMachine
Jul 18 at 16:32
@ThePopMachine Sure we never see him dead only dying and with the illusion tech anything is possible. I think barring any other evidence though at the moment we have to assume he is dead.
– TheLethalCarrot
Jul 18 at 16:33
@ThePopMachine Sure we never see him dead only dying and with the illusion tech anything is possible. I think barring any other evidence though at the moment we have to assume he is dead.
– TheLethalCarrot
Jul 18 at 16:33
Beck isn't dead for sure, he might appear in coming disney+ series
– Vikas Yadav
2 days ago
Beck isn't dead for sure, he might appear in coming disney+ series
– Vikas Yadav
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216155%2fhow-was-peter-parker-able-to-use-edith-in-the-end%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…
– Raj
Jul 17 at 20:33
1
@Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.
– Broots Waymb
Jul 17 at 20:36
2
The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?
– Harry Johnston
Jul 17 at 21:27
1
“Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it” — yup. As @HarryJohnston alludes to, EDITH seems to verify Peter earlier in the movie by doing some sort of scan of his face. Presumably the authentication that enables Peter to take control of the glasses requires him to be wearing them.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 18 at 9:02