The seven story archetypes. Are they truly all of them?What is a good way to come up with original world building ideas?Are the following passages examples of tense change? Are they allowed in fiction writing?How political can an author's note be, would the following fly?Story development: Multiple characters premisesWriting a non-lucid dreamInvesting in the 'wrong' character, is it a problem with the story?How do I handle a backstory big enough to be a story of its own?How could a paragon character be an antagonist?Is it a bad habit to cause too many deep permanent changes in the status quo of a story that envisions sequels?Prepare for more after the “ending”?What are the points to remember when the pet is the narrator and is narrating the story of its owner?
UX writing: When to use "we"?
What's the term for a group of people who enjoy literary works?
Map vs. Table for index-specific operations on 2D arrays
Export economy of Mars
Why interlaced CRT scanning wasn't done back and forth?
How to trick a fairly simplistic kill-counter?
How did Biff return to 2015 from 1955 without a lightning strike?
If a Shadow Magic sorcerer casts Darkness using the Eyes of the Dark feature, can they cast another spell that requires concentration?
What is the difference between "logical equivalence" and "material equivalence"?
How do people drown while wearing a life jacket?
What does the "きゃ" in "していきゃがらなかった" stand for?
Why do we need a voltage divider when we get the same voltage at the output as the input?
Why are prop blades not shaped like household fan blades?
Can an alphabet for a Turing machine contain subsets of other alphabets?
How do I safety check that there is no light in Darkroom / Darkbag?
Gold Battle KoTH
Is Illustrator accurate for business card sizes?
Password management for kids - what's a good way to start?
Can birds evolve without trees?
Applied Meditation
cannot trash malware NGPlayerSetup.dmg
Went to a big 4 but got fired for underperformance in a year recently - Now every one thinks I'm pro - How to balance expectations?
Should I take up a Creative Writing online course?
Being told my "network" isn't PCI Complaint. I don't even have a server! Do I have to comply?
The seven story archetypes. Are they truly all of them?
What is a good way to come up with original world building ideas?Are the following passages examples of tense change? Are they allowed in fiction writing?How political can an author's note be, would the following fly?Story development: Multiple characters premisesWriting a non-lucid dreamInvesting in the 'wrong' character, is it a problem with the story?How do I handle a backstory big enough to be a story of its own?How could a paragon character be an antagonist?Is it a bad habit to cause too many deep permanent changes in the status quo of a story that envisions sequels?Prepare for more after the “ending”?What are the points to remember when the pet is the narrator and is narrating the story of its owner?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
The seven archetypes are as follows:
Overcoming the Monster.
Rags to Riches.
The Quest.
Voyage and Return.
Comedy.
Tragedy.
Rebirth.
But surely, there are more? For example, riches to rags? That is one, right? Or would that go into another one, like rebirth, tragedy or even overcoming the monster, the monster being poverty?
What I'm asking is: Are the seven archetypes all of them, or simply the most common, fundamental ones?
plot narrative archetypes
asked Jul 23 at 20:37
A. KvåleA. Kvåle
1,62012 silver badges37 bronze badges
|
show 10 more comments
The seven archetypes are as follows:
Overcoming the Monster.
Rags to Riches.
The Quest.
Voyage and Return.
Comedy.
Tragedy.
Rebirth.
But surely, there are more? For example, riches to rags? That is one, right? Or would that go into another one, like rebirth, tragedy or even overcoming the monster, the monster being poverty?
What I'm asking is: Are the seven archetypes all of them, or simply the most common, fundamental ones?
plot narrative archetypes
asked Jul 23 at 20:37
A. KvåleA. Kvåle
1,62012 silver badges37 bronze badges
4
In theory, yes, but all of these are gigantic umbrellas and barely useful.
– Weckar E.
Jul 23 at 20:44
27
This list reads as if the creator was really struggling to come up with seven distinct archetypes, but wouldn't stop until he had seven. Overcoming the Monster is a Quest, Voyage and Return is a Quest, and Comedy/Tragedy are genres, not story archetypes. So really I only count three archetypes in that list. Who made this?
– PoorYorick
Jul 23 at 21:53
5
The Six Main Arcs in Storytelling, as Identified by an A.I.
– wetcircuit
Jul 23 at 22:27
25
In the words of Leo Tolstoy: "All great literature is one of three stories: a man goes on a journey, a stranger comes to town, and Godzilla versus Megashark."
– Sigma Ori
Jul 24 at 17:12
4
No. Aldous Huxley said there were 12. F. Scott Fitzgerald said there were two. There is no correct answer to this.
– user207421
Jul 26 at 8:12
|
show 10 more comments
The seven archetypes are as follows:
Overcoming the Monster.
Rags to Riches.
The Quest.
Voyage and Return.
Comedy.
Tragedy.
Rebirth.
But surely, there are more? For example, riches to rags? That is one, right? Or would that go into another one, like rebirth, tragedy or even overcoming the monster, the monster being poverty?
What I'm asking is: Are the seven archetypes all of them, or simply the most common, fundamental ones?
plot narrative archetypes
asked Jul 23 at 20:37
A. KvåleA. Kvåle
1,62012 silver badges37 bronze badges
The seven archetypes are as follows:
Overcoming the Monster.
Rags to Riches.
The Quest.
Voyage and Return.
Comedy.
Tragedy.
Rebirth.
But surely, there are more? For example, riches to rags? That is one, right? Or would that go into another one, like rebirth, tragedy or even overcoming the monster, the monster being poverty?
What I'm asking is: Are the seven archetypes all of them, or simply the most common, fundamental ones?
plot narrative archetypes
plot narrative archetypes
asked Jul 23 at 20:37
A. KvåleA. Kvåle
1,62012 silver badges37 bronze badges
asked Jul 23 at 20:37
A. KvåleA. Kvåle
1,62012 silver badges37 bronze badges
asked Jul 23 at 20:37
A. KvåleA. Kvåle
1,62012 silver badges37 bronze badges
asked Jul 23 at 20:37
A. KvåleA. Kvåle
1,62012 silver badges37 bronze badges
asked Jul 23 at 20:37
A. KvåleA. Kvåle
1,62012 silver badges37 bronze badges
1,62012 silver badges37 bronze badges
4
In theory, yes, but all of these are gigantic umbrellas and barely useful.
– Weckar E.
Jul 23 at 20:44
27
This list reads as if the creator was really struggling to come up with seven distinct archetypes, but wouldn't stop until he had seven. Overcoming the Monster is a Quest, Voyage and Return is a Quest, and Comedy/Tragedy are genres, not story archetypes. So really I only count three archetypes in that list. Who made this?
– PoorYorick
Jul 23 at 21:53
5
The Six Main Arcs in Storytelling, as Identified by an A.I.
– wetcircuit
Jul 23 at 22:27
25
In the words of Leo Tolstoy: "All great literature is one of three stories: a man goes on a journey, a stranger comes to town, and Godzilla versus Megashark."
– Sigma Ori
Jul 24 at 17:12
4
No. Aldous Huxley said there were 12. F. Scott Fitzgerald said there were two. There is no correct answer to this.
– user207421
Jul 26 at 8:12
|
show 10 more comments
4
In theory, yes, but all of these are gigantic umbrellas and barely useful.
– Weckar E.
Jul 23 at 20:44
27
This list reads as if the creator was really struggling to come up with seven distinct archetypes, but wouldn't stop until he had seven. Overcoming the Monster is a Quest, Voyage and Return is a Quest, and Comedy/Tragedy are genres, not story archetypes. So really I only count three archetypes in that list. Who made this?
– PoorYorick
Jul 23 at 21:53
5
The Six Main Arcs in Storytelling, as Identified by an A.I.
– wetcircuit
Jul 23 at 22:27
25
In the words of Leo Tolstoy: "All great literature is one of three stories: a man goes on a journey, a stranger comes to town, and Godzilla versus Megashark."
– Sigma Ori
Jul 24 at 17:12
4
No. Aldous Huxley said there were 12. F. Scott Fitzgerald said there were two. There is no correct answer to this.
– user207421
Jul 26 at 8:12
4
4
In theory, yes, but all of these are gigantic umbrellas and barely useful.
– Weckar E.
Jul 23 at 20:44
In theory, yes, but all of these are gigantic umbrellas and barely useful.
– Weckar E.
Jul 23 at 20:44
27
27
This list reads as if the creator was really struggling to come up with seven distinct archetypes, but wouldn't stop until he had seven. Overcoming the Monster is a Quest, Voyage and Return is a Quest, and Comedy/Tragedy are genres, not story archetypes. So really I only count three archetypes in that list. Who made this?
– PoorYorick
Jul 23 at 21:53
This list reads as if the creator was really struggling to come up with seven distinct archetypes, but wouldn't stop until he had seven. Overcoming the Monster is a Quest, Voyage and Return is a Quest, and Comedy/Tragedy are genres, not story archetypes. So really I only count three archetypes in that list. Who made this?
– PoorYorick
Jul 23 at 21:53
5
5
The Six Main Arcs in Storytelling, as Identified by an A.I.
– wetcircuit
Jul 23 at 22:27
The Six Main Arcs in Storytelling, as Identified by an A.I.
– wetcircuit
Jul 23 at 22:27
25
25
In the words of Leo Tolstoy: "All great literature is one of three stories: a man goes on a journey, a stranger comes to town, and Godzilla versus Megashark."
– Sigma Ori
Jul 24 at 17:12
In the words of Leo Tolstoy: "All great literature is one of three stories: a man goes on a journey, a stranger comes to town, and Godzilla versus Megashark."
– Sigma Ori
Jul 24 at 17:12
4
4
No. Aldous Huxley said there were 12. F. Scott Fitzgerald said there were two. There is no correct answer to this.
– user207421
Jul 26 at 8:12
No. Aldous Huxley said there were 12. F. Scott Fitzgerald said there were two. There is no correct answer to this.
– user207421
Jul 26 at 8:12
|
show 10 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
No, they are not all of them. This is a common game, there are many books claiming there are 3 plots, 7 plots, 12 plots, 21 plots, 23 plots, whatever.
You could say there is only one plot: Character Has A Problem.
Overcoming the Monster. The monster is the problem.
Rags to Riches. Poverty, disrespect, deprivation is the problem.
The Quest. Finding the McGuffin is the problem.
Voyage and Return. The reason for the voyage is a problem; perhaps a craving for adventure, perhaps a mission.
Comedy. Still always a problem, just this time its funny.
Tragedy. A problem that doesn't get solved.
Rebirth. The problem is the Character, or the solution to the problem demands a major change in the Character.
Romance: The problem is winning the desired partner, or if already won, finding a way to be permanently together.
Non-romantic love: The problem is with forming, pursuing or repairing a non-romantic relationship (parent, child, friend, etc).
Each of these problems can be presented in various ways, with various twists, and the different supposed "archetypes" can meld into each other: From your original list, Overcoming the Monster could easily lead to a Quest, or Rebirth; as could Rags to Riches. Or Rags to Riches could lead to Tragedy; succeeding in the Rags to Riches may leave the MC isolated, vilified, and lonely.
Don't believe it! It may be useful to know how various archetypes or plots unfold, but my advice (after reading about a dozen books on plotting) is to stick to ONE archetype: Your character (or crew) has a problem.
Then something like the Three Act structure. The story starts in Act I, their normal world. The problem appears in Act I. In Act II they try various ways to solve it with varying levels of success. In Act III they try their last hope and either succeed or mostly succeed or they fail.
answered Jul 23 at 21:36
AmadeusAmadeus
70.9k7 gold badges93 silver badges233 bronze badges
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Monica Cellio♦
Jul 31 at 1:43
add a comment |
The archetypes are a descriptive framework created by scholars in order to describe stories. Someone had a theory, says every story fits into one of those archetypes. Any story you give them, they will fit it into one of those archetypes, even if it squeaks a little.
For my part, there are stories I struggle to fit into this framework. The Jungle Book, for example. (Kipling's work, not the travesty Disney made of it.) Or Hemingway's The Sun also Rises. I'm sure a scholar could explain to me how they do fit into one of those archetypes. For my part, I don't really see it.
Here's the thing though: as a writer, I don't care. Let the classifiers classify. Me - I write. And my story is not "something that fits some archetype" - it is an absolutely unique creation that is entirely my own. Like a child - sure, it's a mammal. It's a Homo sapiens. But all that is irrelevant - only thing that's relevant is that this is my child, and s/he smiles at me. And my child is entirely unique, right?
answered Jul 23 at 21:40
GalastelGalastel
43.4k6 gold badges133 silver badges243 bronze badges
1
The Raven has a definite plot, but it does not fit cleanly into any of those archetypes.
– TimothyAWiseman
Jul 25 at 19:18
add a comment |
Do you want the most stories, or the least stories?
The ad infinitum of plot lists is probably the book Plotto: The Master Book of All Plots by William Wallace Cook. It's a manic collection of (often bizarre) story vignettes, with an algebraic formula for how to string them together. It claims to offer over 2000 plot conflicts, based on his organizing structure "Purpose opposed by Obstacle yields Conflict".
Plotto is essentially a list of (spin wheel) character goals that are thwarted by (spin wheel) stuff that happens, connected by an index of stock characters and supporting roles, sort of in the vein of a Choose Your Own Adventure book, but much shorter. The resulting "plot" is a few sentences long, often involving a confusing list of characters and sub-characters, and the author is still expected to provide the creativity and logic to turn it into an actual story.
The most reductive plot list is probably resolving every possible story to 3 Act Structure, a formula with a beginning, middle, and end spaced more or less evenly.
What is the goal?
Is the goal to find a system that inspires creativity? Or is the goal to use a system that helps "normalize" every story into the simplest familiar pattern?
7 is an arbitrary number, and as stated in other answers and comments, the OP's list is apples and oranges (and a couple of onions). What, exactly is being compared (or differentiated) in these supposed "archetypes"?
Is it the progress of the protagonists status? (Rags to Riches)
Is it a Theme or feeling the reader is left with? (Tragedy)
Is it events that happen in the story? (Voyage and Return)
Is it the central conflict? (Overcoming a Monster)
Is it the author's style and voice? (Comedy)
Any system might be helpful, I guess, if the system is based on consistent principles, or at least if the goal is clear.
No, this is not all the story archetypes
A century later, Plotto's extensive list is extremely dated, more a comical curiosity of the past, and one man's attempt to organize a "story mill" so he could churn out an amazing quantity of stories. However, most of his stories published in periodicals under dozens of pen names that fit whatever genre he was targetting, are now lost or forgotten. The few that were converted into novels are not well reviewed. Apparently being a master of formulaic archetypes doesn't make you a good author, just a prolific one.
Formulas are great when you get paid by word-count and you need to churn out generic filler, page after page. For memorable stories that stand the test of time, the author still has to do all the work.
answered Jul 25 at 12:08
wetcircuitwetcircuit
20.3k2 gold badges34 silver badges98 bronze badges
1
Years ago, someone found a copy of Plotto, realized "This is an algorithm", and converted the contents into what was probably the first computerized Story Generator app. I don't remember what it was called, but I bought a copy.
– Shawn V. Wilson
Jul 25 at 20:13
Could you send a link to the Plotto spin wheel? Sounds very interesting
– A. Kvåle
Jul 25 at 21:36
add a comment |
Most attempts at classifying things like this are completely arbitrary. Different writers will come up with different lists, and it's not like you could somehow prove that one is right and the others are wrong.
This reminds me ... nothing about writing, but about classifying. A friend of mine who had not gone to college as a young person decided to go when she was in her 40s. She thought maybe she could get an exemption from some introductory classes based on knowledge she had accumulated over the years. One class she tried to get out of was Politics 101. So she went to see the teacher. The teacher said, "Well, let's see if you know the material." She ten pulled out the textbook, flipped it open, and said, "What are the 7 functions of a political party?" My friend rattled off some things. The teacher said her answer was incomplete and refused to let her out of the class.
The funny part is: My friend was the president of a prestigious Political Action Committee. She was on a first name basis with senators and governors. Candidates struggled to win her endorsement. She probably knew more about politics than the teacher of this class. But because she could not come up with the same list of "the 7 functions of a political party" that were in the textbook, the teacher concluded she didn't know much about politics.
Coming up with a classification scheme in which everything clearly and unambiguously fits in one and only one category is tough. I can see lots of problems with this list. Couldn't a "rags to riches" story also be a comedy? When would "voyage and return" NOT be a "quest"? What about a romance story? That doesn't seem to fit any of these categories. Maybe the author would say that it's an example of "overcoming the monster" where the "monster" is what keeps the couple apart, but at that point he'd be saying that "monster" means any sort of problem, and almost every story is about overcoming some sort of problem, so that category includes all the others. Etc.
Furthermore, there are many ways one could classify stories, just as there are many ways that one could classify almost anything. You might divide stories into tragedy, comedy, romance, whatever you need to complete that list. (There's a funny conversation about this in Shakespeare's Hamlet.) Netflix divides stories into action, drama, horror, science fiction, romance, and new releases. (Maybe some others.) Stories are often classified as children, young adult, or adult. Or as short story vs novella vs novel. People will identify stories as "having a strong female main character" versus ... weak female characters, I guess. Etc etc.
You can come up with a "one and only one category" list if you have simple enough criteria. If you classify by a yes/no question, then everything is either yes or no, maybe you have to provide for maybe or mixed, and you can be confidant you have been definitive. There are some other cases when you can be confidant you are definitive. Like all religious beliefs either say there is no god, there is one God, or there are many gods. Zero, one or more than one. That clearly represents all possibilities. That sort of thing.
So no, this list is not definitive. I don't think this particular list is even a very good one.
answered Jul 26 at 20:28
JayJay
22.2k17 silver badges59 bronze badges
add a comment |
Riches to Rags. Typically this is a western song though.
A series of events. See Tom Sawyer. There's no real progression until the Deus Ex Machina of all that gold in the end, and Huck doesn't even like the result.
answered Jul 25 at 1:51
JoshuaJoshua
1234 bronze badges
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46854%2fthe-seven-story-archetypes-are-they-truly-all-of-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, they are not all of them. This is a common game, there are many books claiming there are 3 plots, 7 plots, 12 plots, 21 plots, 23 plots, whatever.
You could say there is only one plot: Character Has A Problem.
Overcoming the Monster. The monster is the problem.
Rags to Riches. Poverty, disrespect, deprivation is the problem.
The Quest. Finding the McGuffin is the problem.
Voyage and Return. The reason for the voyage is a problem; perhaps a craving for adventure, perhaps a mission.
Comedy. Still always a problem, just this time its funny.
Tragedy. A problem that doesn't get solved.
Rebirth. The problem is the Character, or the solution to the problem demands a major change in the Character.
Romance: The problem is winning the desired partner, or if already won, finding a way to be permanently together.
Non-romantic love: The problem is with forming, pursuing or repairing a non-romantic relationship (parent, child, friend, etc).
Each of these problems can be presented in various ways, with various twists, and the different supposed "archetypes" can meld into each other: From your original list, Overcoming the Monster could easily lead to a Quest, or Rebirth; as could Rags to Riches. Or Rags to Riches could lead to Tragedy; succeeding in the Rags to Riches may leave the MC isolated, vilified, and lonely.
Don't believe it! It may be useful to know how various archetypes or plots unfold, but my advice (after reading about a dozen books on plotting) is to stick to ONE archetype: Your character (or crew) has a problem.
Then something like the Three Act structure. The story starts in Act I, their normal world. The problem appears in Act I. In Act II they try various ways to solve it with varying levels of success. In Act III they try their last hope and either succeed or mostly succeed or they fail.
answered Jul 23 at 21:36
AmadeusAmadeus
70.9k7 gold badges93 silver badges233 bronze badges
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Monica Cellio♦
Jul 31 at 1:43
add a comment |
No, they are not all of them. This is a common game, there are many books claiming there are 3 plots, 7 plots, 12 plots, 21 plots, 23 plots, whatever.
You could say there is only one plot: Character Has A Problem.
Overcoming the Monster. The monster is the problem.
Rags to Riches. Poverty, disrespect, deprivation is the problem.
The Quest. Finding the McGuffin is the problem.
Voyage and Return. The reason for the voyage is a problem; perhaps a craving for adventure, perhaps a mission.
Comedy. Still always a problem, just this time its funny.
Tragedy. A problem that doesn't get solved.
Rebirth. The problem is the Character, or the solution to the problem demands a major change in the Character.
Romance: The problem is winning the desired partner, or if already won, finding a way to be permanently together.
Non-romantic love: The problem is with forming, pursuing or repairing a non-romantic relationship (parent, child, friend, etc).
Each of these problems can be presented in various ways, with various twists, and the different supposed "archetypes" can meld into each other: From your original list, Overcoming the Monster could easily lead to a Quest, or Rebirth; as could Rags to Riches. Or Rags to Riches could lead to Tragedy; succeeding in the Rags to Riches may leave the MC isolated, vilified, and lonely.
Don't believe it! It may be useful to know how various archetypes or plots unfold, but my advice (after reading about a dozen books on plotting) is to stick to ONE archetype: Your character (or crew) has a problem.
Then something like the Three Act structure. The story starts in Act I, their normal world. The problem appears in Act I. In Act II they try various ways to solve it with varying levels of success. In Act III they try their last hope and either succeed or mostly succeed or they fail.
answered Jul 23 at 21:36
AmadeusAmadeus
70.9k7 gold badges93 silver badges233 bronze badges
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Monica Cellio♦
Jul 31 at 1:43
add a comment |
No, they are not all of them. This is a common game, there are many books claiming there are 3 plots, 7 plots, 12 plots, 21 plots, 23 plots, whatever.
You could say there is only one plot: Character Has A Problem.
Overcoming the Monster. The monster is the problem.
Rags to Riches. Poverty, disrespect, deprivation is the problem.
The Quest. Finding the McGuffin is the problem.
Voyage and Return. The reason for the voyage is a problem; perhaps a craving for adventure, perhaps a mission.
Comedy. Still always a problem, just this time its funny.
Tragedy. A problem that doesn't get solved.
Rebirth. The problem is the Character, or the solution to the problem demands a major change in the Character.
Romance: The problem is winning the desired partner, or if already won, finding a way to be permanently together.
Non-romantic love: The problem is with forming, pursuing or repairing a non-romantic relationship (parent, child, friend, etc).
Each of these problems can be presented in various ways, with various twists, and the different supposed "archetypes" can meld into each other: From your original list, Overcoming the Monster could easily lead to a Quest, or Rebirth; as could Rags to Riches. Or Rags to Riches could lead to Tragedy; succeeding in the Rags to Riches may leave the MC isolated, vilified, and lonely.
Don't believe it! It may be useful to know how various archetypes or plots unfold, but my advice (after reading about a dozen books on plotting) is to stick to ONE archetype: Your character (or crew) has a problem.
Then something like the Three Act structure. The story starts in Act I, their normal world. The problem appears in Act I. In Act II they try various ways to solve it with varying levels of success. In Act III they try their last hope and either succeed or mostly succeed or they fail.
answered Jul 23 at 21:36
AmadeusAmadeus
70.9k7 gold badges93 silver badges233 bronze badges
No, they are not all of them. This is a common game, there are many books claiming there are 3 plots, 7 plots, 12 plots, 21 plots, 23 plots, whatever.
You could say there is only one plot: Character Has A Problem.
Overcoming the Monster. The monster is the problem.
Rags to Riches. Poverty, disrespect, deprivation is the problem.
The Quest. Finding the McGuffin is the problem.
Voyage and Return. The reason for the voyage is a problem; perhaps a craving for adventure, perhaps a mission.
Comedy. Still always a problem, just this time its funny.
Tragedy. A problem that doesn't get solved.
Rebirth. The problem is the Character, or the solution to the problem demands a major change in the Character.
Romance: The problem is winning the desired partner, or if already won, finding a way to be permanently together.
Non-romantic love: The problem is with forming, pursuing or repairing a non-romantic relationship (parent, child, friend, etc).
Each of these problems can be presented in various ways, with various twists, and the different supposed "archetypes" can meld into each other: From your original list, Overcoming the Monster could easily lead to a Quest, or Rebirth; as could Rags to Riches. Or Rags to Riches could lead to Tragedy; succeeding in the Rags to Riches may leave the MC isolated, vilified, and lonely.
Don't believe it! It may be useful to know how various archetypes or plots unfold, but my advice (after reading about a dozen books on plotting) is to stick to ONE archetype: Your character (or crew) has a problem.
Then something like the Three Act structure. The story starts in Act I, their normal world. The problem appears in Act I. In Act II they try various ways to solve it with varying levels of success. In Act III they try their last hope and either succeed or mostly succeed or they fail.
answered Jul 23 at 21:36
AmadeusAmadeus
70.9k7 gold badges93 silver badges233 bronze badges
answered Jul 23 at 21:36
AmadeusAmadeus
70.9k7 gold badges93 silver badges233 bronze badges
answered Jul 23 at 21:36
AmadeusAmadeus
70.9k7 gold badges93 silver badges233 bronze badges
answered Jul 23 at 21:36
AmadeusAmadeus
70.9k7 gold badges93 silver badges233 bronze badges
70.9k7 gold badges93 silver badges233 bronze badges
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Monica Cellio♦
Jul 31 at 1:43
add a comment |
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Monica Cellio♦
Jul 31 at 1:43
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Monica Cellio♦
Jul 31 at 1:43
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Monica Cellio♦
Jul 31 at 1:43
add a comment |
The archetypes are a descriptive framework created by scholars in order to describe stories. Someone had a theory, says every story fits into one of those archetypes. Any story you give them, they will fit it into one of those archetypes, even if it squeaks a little.
For my part, there are stories I struggle to fit into this framework. The Jungle Book, for example. (Kipling's work, not the travesty Disney made of it.) Or Hemingway's The Sun also Rises. I'm sure a scholar could explain to me how they do fit into one of those archetypes. For my part, I don't really see it.
Here's the thing though: as a writer, I don't care. Let the classifiers classify. Me - I write. And my story is not "something that fits some archetype" - it is an absolutely unique creation that is entirely my own. Like a child - sure, it's a mammal. It's a Homo sapiens. But all that is irrelevant - only thing that's relevant is that this is my child, and s/he smiles at me. And my child is entirely unique, right?
answered Jul 23 at 21:40
GalastelGalastel
43.4k6 gold badges133 silver badges243 bronze badges
1
The Raven has a definite plot, but it does not fit cleanly into any of those archetypes.
– TimothyAWiseman
Jul 25 at 19:18
add a comment |
The archetypes are a descriptive framework created by scholars in order to describe stories. Someone had a theory, says every story fits into one of those archetypes. Any story you give them, they will fit it into one of those archetypes, even if it squeaks a little.
For my part, there are stories I struggle to fit into this framework. The Jungle Book, for example. (Kipling's work, not the travesty Disney made of it.) Or Hemingway's The Sun also Rises. I'm sure a scholar could explain to me how they do fit into one of those archetypes. For my part, I don't really see it.
Here's the thing though: as a writer, I don't care. Let the classifiers classify. Me - I write. And my story is not "something that fits some archetype" - it is an absolutely unique creation that is entirely my own. Like a child - sure, it's a mammal. It's a Homo sapiens. But all that is irrelevant - only thing that's relevant is that this is my child, and s/he smiles at me. And my child is entirely unique, right?
answered Jul 23 at 21:40
GalastelGalastel
43.4k6 gold badges133 silver badges243 bronze badges
1
The Raven has a definite plot, but it does not fit cleanly into any of those archetypes.
– TimothyAWiseman
Jul 25 at 19:18
add a comment |
The archetypes are a descriptive framework created by scholars in order to describe stories. Someone had a theory, says every story fits into one of those archetypes. Any story you give them, they will fit it into one of those archetypes, even if it squeaks a little.
For my part, there are stories I struggle to fit into this framework. The Jungle Book, for example. (Kipling's work, not the travesty Disney made of it.) Or Hemingway's The Sun also Rises. I'm sure a scholar could explain to me how they do fit into one of those archetypes. For my part, I don't really see it.
Here's the thing though: as a writer, I don't care. Let the classifiers classify. Me - I write. And my story is not "something that fits some archetype" - it is an absolutely unique creation that is entirely my own. Like a child - sure, it's a mammal. It's a Homo sapiens. But all that is irrelevant - only thing that's relevant is that this is my child, and s/he smiles at me. And my child is entirely unique, right?
answered Jul 23 at 21:40
GalastelGalastel
43.4k6 gold badges133 silver badges243 bronze badges
The archetypes are a descriptive framework created by scholars in order to describe stories. Someone had a theory, says every story fits into one of those archetypes. Any story you give them, they will fit it into one of those archetypes, even if it squeaks a little.
For my part, there are stories I struggle to fit into this framework. The Jungle Book, for example. (Kipling's work, not the travesty Disney made of it.) Or Hemingway's The Sun also Rises. I'm sure a scholar could explain to me how they do fit into one of those archetypes. For my part, I don't really see it.
Here's the thing though: as a writer, I don't care. Let the classifiers classify. Me - I write. And my story is not "something that fits some archetype" - it is an absolutely unique creation that is entirely my own. Like a child - sure, it's a mammal. It's a Homo sapiens. But all that is irrelevant - only thing that's relevant is that this is my child, and s/he smiles at me. And my child is entirely unique, right?
answered Jul 23 at 21:40
GalastelGalastel
43.4k6 gold badges133 silver badges243 bronze badges
answered Jul 23 at 21:40
GalastelGalastel
43.4k6 gold badges133 silver badges243 bronze badges
answered Jul 23 at 21:40
GalastelGalastel
43.4k6 gold badges133 silver badges243 bronze badges
answered Jul 23 at 21:40
GalastelGalastel
43.4k6 gold badges133 silver badges243 bronze badges
43.4k6 gold badges133 silver badges243 bronze badges
1
The Raven has a definite plot, but it does not fit cleanly into any of those archetypes.
– TimothyAWiseman
Jul 25 at 19:18
add a comment |
1
The Raven has a definite plot, but it does not fit cleanly into any of those archetypes.
– TimothyAWiseman
Jul 25 at 19:18
1
1
The Raven has a definite plot, but it does not fit cleanly into any of those archetypes.
– TimothyAWiseman
Jul 25 at 19:18
The Raven has a definite plot, but it does not fit cleanly into any of those archetypes.
– TimothyAWiseman
Jul 25 at 19:18
add a comment |
Do you want the most stories, or the least stories?
The ad infinitum of plot lists is probably the book Plotto: The Master Book of All Plots by William Wallace Cook. It's a manic collection of (often bizarre) story vignettes, with an algebraic formula for how to string them together. It claims to offer over 2000 plot conflicts, based on his organizing structure "Purpose opposed by Obstacle yields Conflict".
Plotto is essentially a list of (spin wheel) character goals that are thwarted by (spin wheel) stuff that happens, connected by an index of stock characters and supporting roles, sort of in the vein of a Choose Your Own Adventure book, but much shorter. The resulting "plot" is a few sentences long, often involving a confusing list of characters and sub-characters, and the author is still expected to provide the creativity and logic to turn it into an actual story.
The most reductive plot list is probably resolving every possible story to 3 Act Structure, a formula with a beginning, middle, and end spaced more or less evenly.
What is the goal?
Is the goal to find a system that inspires creativity? Or is the goal to use a system that helps "normalize" every story into the simplest familiar pattern?
7 is an arbitrary number, and as stated in other answers and comments, the OP's list is apples and oranges (and a couple of onions). What, exactly is being compared (or differentiated) in these supposed "archetypes"?
Is it the progress of the protagonists status? (Rags to Riches)
Is it a Theme or feeling the reader is left with? (Tragedy)
Is it events that happen in the story? (Voyage and Return)
Is it the central conflict? (Overcoming a Monster)
Is it the author's style and voice? (Comedy)
Any system might be helpful, I guess, if the system is based on consistent principles, or at least if the goal is clear.
No, this is not all the story archetypes
A century later, Plotto's extensive list is extremely dated, more a comical curiosity of the past, and one man's attempt to organize a "story mill" so he could churn out an amazing quantity of stories. However, most of his stories published in periodicals under dozens of pen names that fit whatever genre he was targetting, are now lost or forgotten. The few that were converted into novels are not well reviewed. Apparently being a master of formulaic archetypes doesn't make you a good author, just a prolific one.
Formulas are great when you get paid by word-count and you need to churn out generic filler, page after page. For memorable stories that stand the test of time, the author still has to do all the work.
answered Jul 25 at 12:08
wetcircuitwetcircuit
20.3k2 gold badges34 silver badges98 bronze badges
1
Years ago, someone found a copy of Plotto, realized "This is an algorithm", and converted the contents into what was probably the first computerized Story Generator app. I don't remember what it was called, but I bought a copy.
– Shawn V. Wilson
Jul 25 at 20:13
Could you send a link to the Plotto spin wheel? Sounds very interesting
– A. Kvåle
Jul 25 at 21:36
add a comment |
Do you want the most stories, or the least stories?
The ad infinitum of plot lists is probably the book Plotto: The Master Book of All Plots by William Wallace Cook. It's a manic collection of (often bizarre) story vignettes, with an algebraic formula for how to string them together. It claims to offer over 2000 plot conflicts, based on his organizing structure "Purpose opposed by Obstacle yields Conflict".
Plotto is essentially a list of (spin wheel) character goals that are thwarted by (spin wheel) stuff that happens, connected by an index of stock characters and supporting roles, sort of in the vein of a Choose Your Own Adventure book, but much shorter. The resulting "plot" is a few sentences long, often involving a confusing list of characters and sub-characters, and the author is still expected to provide the creativity and logic to turn it into an actual story.
The most reductive plot list is probably resolving every possible story to 3 Act Structure, a formula with a beginning, middle, and end spaced more or less evenly.
What is the goal?
Is the goal to find a system that inspires creativity? Or is the goal to use a system that helps "normalize" every story into the simplest familiar pattern?
7 is an arbitrary number, and as stated in other answers and comments, the OP's list is apples and oranges (and a couple of onions). What, exactly is being compared (or differentiated) in these supposed "archetypes"?
Is it the progress of the protagonists status? (Rags to Riches)
Is it a Theme or feeling the reader is left with? (Tragedy)
Is it events that happen in the story? (Voyage and Return)
Is it the central conflict? (Overcoming a Monster)
Is it the author's style and voice? (Comedy)
Any system might be helpful, I guess, if the system is based on consistent principles, or at least if the goal is clear.
No, this is not all the story archetypes
A century later, Plotto's extensive list is extremely dated, more a comical curiosity of the past, and one man's attempt to organize a "story mill" so he could churn out an amazing quantity of stories. However, most of his stories published in periodicals under dozens of pen names that fit whatever genre he was targetting, are now lost or forgotten. The few that were converted into novels are not well reviewed. Apparently being a master of formulaic archetypes doesn't make you a good author, just a prolific one.
Formulas are great when you get paid by word-count and you need to churn out generic filler, page after page. For memorable stories that stand the test of time, the author still has to do all the work.
answered Jul 25 at 12:08
wetcircuitwetcircuit
20.3k2 gold badges34 silver badges98 bronze badges
1
Years ago, someone found a copy of Plotto, realized "This is an algorithm", and converted the contents into what was probably the first computerized Story Generator app. I don't remember what it was called, but I bought a copy.
– Shawn V. Wilson
Jul 25 at 20:13
Could you send a link to the Plotto spin wheel? Sounds very interesting
– A. Kvåle
Jul 25 at 21:36
add a comment |
Do you want the most stories, or the least stories?
The ad infinitum of plot lists is probably the book Plotto: The Master Book of All Plots by William Wallace Cook. It's a manic collection of (often bizarre) story vignettes, with an algebraic formula for how to string them together. It claims to offer over 2000 plot conflicts, based on his organizing structure "Purpose opposed by Obstacle yields Conflict".
Plotto is essentially a list of (spin wheel) character goals that are thwarted by (spin wheel) stuff that happens, connected by an index of stock characters and supporting roles, sort of in the vein of a Choose Your Own Adventure book, but much shorter. The resulting "plot" is a few sentences long, often involving a confusing list of characters and sub-characters, and the author is still expected to provide the creativity and logic to turn it into an actual story.
The most reductive plot list is probably resolving every possible story to 3 Act Structure, a formula with a beginning, middle, and end spaced more or less evenly.
What is the goal?
Is the goal to find a system that inspires creativity? Or is the goal to use a system that helps "normalize" every story into the simplest familiar pattern?
7 is an arbitrary number, and as stated in other answers and comments, the OP's list is apples and oranges (and a couple of onions). What, exactly is being compared (or differentiated) in these supposed "archetypes"?
Is it the progress of the protagonists status? (Rags to Riches)
Is it a Theme or feeling the reader is left with? (Tragedy)
Is it events that happen in the story? (Voyage and Return)
Is it the central conflict? (Overcoming a Monster)
Is it the author's style and voice? (Comedy)
Any system might be helpful, I guess, if the system is based on consistent principles, or at least if the goal is clear.
No, this is not all the story archetypes
A century later, Plotto's extensive list is extremely dated, more a comical curiosity of the past, and one man's attempt to organize a "story mill" so he could churn out an amazing quantity of stories. However, most of his stories published in periodicals under dozens of pen names that fit whatever genre he was targetting, are now lost or forgotten. The few that were converted into novels are not well reviewed. Apparently being a master of formulaic archetypes doesn't make you a good author, just a prolific one.
Formulas are great when you get paid by word-count and you need to churn out generic filler, page after page. For memorable stories that stand the test of time, the author still has to do all the work.
answered Jul 25 at 12:08
wetcircuitwetcircuit
20.3k2 gold badges34 silver badges98 bronze badges
Do you want the most stories, or the least stories?
The ad infinitum of plot lists is probably the book Plotto: The Master Book of All Plots by William Wallace Cook. It's a manic collection of (often bizarre) story vignettes, with an algebraic formula for how to string them together. It claims to offer over 2000 plot conflicts, based on his organizing structure "Purpose opposed by Obstacle yields Conflict".
Plotto is essentially a list of (spin wheel) character goals that are thwarted by (spin wheel) stuff that happens, connected by an index of stock characters and supporting roles, sort of in the vein of a Choose Your Own Adventure book, but much shorter. The resulting "plot" is a few sentences long, often involving a confusing list of characters and sub-characters, and the author is still expected to provide the creativity and logic to turn it into an actual story.
The most reductive plot list is probably resolving every possible story to 3 Act Structure, a formula with a beginning, middle, and end spaced more or less evenly.
What is the goal?
Is the goal to find a system that inspires creativity? Or is the goal to use a system that helps "normalize" every story into the simplest familiar pattern?
7 is an arbitrary number, and as stated in other answers and comments, the OP's list is apples and oranges (and a couple of onions). What, exactly is being compared (or differentiated) in these supposed "archetypes"?
Is it the progress of the protagonists status? (Rags to Riches)
Is it a Theme or feeling the reader is left with? (Tragedy)
Is it events that happen in the story? (Voyage and Return)
Is it the central conflict? (Overcoming a Monster)
Is it the author's style and voice? (Comedy)
Any system might be helpful, I guess, if the system is based on consistent principles, or at least if the goal is clear.
No, this is not all the story archetypes
A century later, Plotto's extensive list is extremely dated, more a comical curiosity of the past, and one man's attempt to organize a "story mill" so he could churn out an amazing quantity of stories. However, most of his stories published in periodicals under dozens of pen names that fit whatever genre he was targetting, are now lost or forgotten. The few that were converted into novels are not well reviewed. Apparently being a master of formulaic archetypes doesn't make you a good author, just a prolific one.
Formulas are great when you get paid by word-count and you need to churn out generic filler, page after page. For memorable stories that stand the test of time, the author still has to do all the work.
answered Jul 25 at 12:08
wetcircuitwetcircuit
20.3k2 gold badges34 silver badges98 bronze badges
edited Jul 25 at 12:19
answered Jul 25 at 12:08
wetcircuitwetcircuit
20.3k2 gold badges34 silver badges98 bronze badges
answered Jul 25 at 12:08
wetcircuitwetcircuit
20.3k2 gold badges34 silver badges98 bronze badges
answered Jul 25 at 12:08
wetcircuitwetcircuit
20.3k2 gold badges34 silver badges98 bronze badges
20.3k2 gold badges34 silver badges98 bronze badges
1
Years ago, someone found a copy of Plotto, realized "This is an algorithm", and converted the contents into what was probably the first computerized Story Generator app. I don't remember what it was called, but I bought a copy.
– Shawn V. Wilson
Jul 25 at 20:13
Could you send a link to the Plotto spin wheel? Sounds very interesting
– A. Kvåle
Jul 25 at 21:36
add a comment |
1
Years ago, someone found a copy of Plotto, realized "This is an algorithm", and converted the contents into what was probably the first computerized Story Generator app. I don't remember what it was called, but I bought a copy.
– Shawn V. Wilson
Jul 25 at 20:13
Could you send a link to the Plotto spin wheel? Sounds very interesting
– A. Kvåle
Jul 25 at 21:36
1
1
Years ago, someone found a copy of Plotto, realized "This is an algorithm", and converted the contents into what was probably the first computerized Story Generator app. I don't remember what it was called, but I bought a copy.
– Shawn V. Wilson
Jul 25 at 20:13
Years ago, someone found a copy of Plotto, realized "This is an algorithm", and converted the contents into what was probably the first computerized Story Generator app. I don't remember what it was called, but I bought a copy.
– Shawn V. Wilson
Jul 25 at 20:13
Could you send a link to the Plotto spin wheel? Sounds very interesting
– A. Kvåle
Jul 25 at 21:36
Could you send a link to the Plotto spin wheel? Sounds very interesting
– A. Kvåle
Jul 25 at 21:36
add a comment |
Most attempts at classifying things like this are completely arbitrary. Different writers will come up with different lists, and it's not like you could somehow prove that one is right and the others are wrong.
This reminds me ... nothing about writing, but about classifying. A friend of mine who had not gone to college as a young person decided to go when she was in her 40s. She thought maybe she could get an exemption from some introductory classes based on knowledge she had accumulated over the years. One class she tried to get out of was Politics 101. So she went to see the teacher. The teacher said, "Well, let's see if you know the material." She ten pulled out the textbook, flipped it open, and said, "What are the 7 functions of a political party?" My friend rattled off some things. The teacher said her answer was incomplete and refused to let her out of the class.
The funny part is: My friend was the president of a prestigious Political Action Committee. She was on a first name basis with senators and governors. Candidates struggled to win her endorsement. She probably knew more about politics than the teacher of this class. But because she could not come up with the same list of "the 7 functions of a political party" that were in the textbook, the teacher concluded she didn't know much about politics.
Coming up with a classification scheme in which everything clearly and unambiguously fits in one and only one category is tough. I can see lots of problems with this list. Couldn't a "rags to riches" story also be a comedy? When would "voyage and return" NOT be a "quest"? What about a romance story? That doesn't seem to fit any of these categories. Maybe the author would say that it's an example of "overcoming the monster" where the "monster" is what keeps the couple apart, but at that point he'd be saying that "monster" means any sort of problem, and almost every story is about overcoming some sort of problem, so that category includes all the others. Etc.
Furthermore, there are many ways one could classify stories, just as there are many ways that one could classify almost anything. You might divide stories into tragedy, comedy, romance, whatever you need to complete that list. (There's a funny conversation about this in Shakespeare's Hamlet.) Netflix divides stories into action, drama, horror, science fiction, romance, and new releases. (Maybe some others.) Stories are often classified as children, young adult, or adult. Or as short story vs novella vs novel. People will identify stories as "having a strong female main character" versus ... weak female characters, I guess. Etc etc.
You can come up with a "one and only one category" list if you have simple enough criteria. If you classify by a yes/no question, then everything is either yes or no, maybe you have to provide for maybe or mixed, and you can be confidant you have been definitive. There are some other cases when you can be confidant you are definitive. Like all religious beliefs either say there is no god, there is one God, or there are many gods. Zero, one or more than one. That clearly represents all possibilities. That sort of thing.
So no, this list is not definitive. I don't think this particular list is even a very good one.
answered Jul 26 at 20:28
JayJay
22.2k17 silver badges59 bronze badges
add a comment |
Most attempts at classifying things like this are completely arbitrary. Different writers will come up with different lists, and it's not like you could somehow prove that one is right and the others are wrong.
This reminds me ... nothing about writing, but about classifying. A friend of mine who had not gone to college as a young person decided to go when she was in her 40s. She thought maybe she could get an exemption from some introductory classes based on knowledge she had accumulated over the years. One class she tried to get out of was Politics 101. So she went to see the teacher. The teacher said, "Well, let's see if you know the material." She ten pulled out the textbook, flipped it open, and said, "What are the 7 functions of a political party?" My friend rattled off some things. The teacher said her answer was incomplete and refused to let her out of the class.
The funny part is: My friend was the president of a prestigious Political Action Committee. She was on a first name basis with senators and governors. Candidates struggled to win her endorsement. She probably knew more about politics than the teacher of this class. But because she could not come up with the same list of "the 7 functions of a political party" that were in the textbook, the teacher concluded she didn't know much about politics.
Coming up with a classification scheme in which everything clearly and unambiguously fits in one and only one category is tough. I can see lots of problems with this list. Couldn't a "rags to riches" story also be a comedy? When would "voyage and return" NOT be a "quest"? What about a romance story? That doesn't seem to fit any of these categories. Maybe the author would say that it's an example of "overcoming the monster" where the "monster" is what keeps the couple apart, but at that point he'd be saying that "monster" means any sort of problem, and almost every story is about overcoming some sort of problem, so that category includes all the others. Etc.
Furthermore, there are many ways one could classify stories, just as there are many ways that one could classify almost anything. You might divide stories into tragedy, comedy, romance, whatever you need to complete that list. (There's a funny conversation about this in Shakespeare's Hamlet.) Netflix divides stories into action, drama, horror, science fiction, romance, and new releases. (Maybe some others.) Stories are often classified as children, young adult, or adult. Or as short story vs novella vs novel. People will identify stories as "having a strong female main character" versus ... weak female characters, I guess. Etc etc.
You can come up with a "one and only one category" list if you have simple enough criteria. If you classify by a yes/no question, then everything is either yes or no, maybe you have to provide for maybe or mixed, and you can be confidant you have been definitive. There are some other cases when you can be confidant you are definitive. Like all religious beliefs either say there is no god, there is one God, or there are many gods. Zero, one or more than one. That clearly represents all possibilities. That sort of thing.
So no, this list is not definitive. I don't think this particular list is even a very good one.
answered Jul 26 at 20:28
JayJay
22.2k17 silver badges59 bronze badges
add a comment |
Most attempts at classifying things like this are completely arbitrary. Different writers will come up with different lists, and it's not like you could somehow prove that one is right and the others are wrong.
This reminds me ... nothing about writing, but about classifying. A friend of mine who had not gone to college as a young person decided to go when she was in her 40s. She thought maybe she could get an exemption from some introductory classes based on knowledge she had accumulated over the years. One class she tried to get out of was Politics 101. So she went to see the teacher. The teacher said, "Well, let's see if you know the material." She ten pulled out the textbook, flipped it open, and said, "What are the 7 functions of a political party?" My friend rattled off some things. The teacher said her answer was incomplete and refused to let her out of the class.
The funny part is: My friend was the president of a prestigious Political Action Committee. She was on a first name basis with senators and governors. Candidates struggled to win her endorsement. She probably knew more about politics than the teacher of this class. But because she could not come up with the same list of "the 7 functions of a political party" that were in the textbook, the teacher concluded she didn't know much about politics.
Coming up with a classification scheme in which everything clearly and unambiguously fits in one and only one category is tough. I can see lots of problems with this list. Couldn't a "rags to riches" story also be a comedy? When would "voyage and return" NOT be a "quest"? What about a romance story? That doesn't seem to fit any of these categories. Maybe the author would say that it's an example of "overcoming the monster" where the "monster" is what keeps the couple apart, but at that point he'd be saying that "monster" means any sort of problem, and almost every story is about overcoming some sort of problem, so that category includes all the others. Etc.
Furthermore, there are many ways one could classify stories, just as there are many ways that one could classify almost anything. You might divide stories into tragedy, comedy, romance, whatever you need to complete that list. (There's a funny conversation about this in Shakespeare's Hamlet.) Netflix divides stories into action, drama, horror, science fiction, romance, and new releases. (Maybe some others.) Stories are often classified as children, young adult, or adult. Or as short story vs novella vs novel. People will identify stories as "having a strong female main character" versus ... weak female characters, I guess. Etc etc.
You can come up with a "one and only one category" list if you have simple enough criteria. If you classify by a yes/no question, then everything is either yes or no, maybe you have to provide for maybe or mixed, and you can be confidant you have been definitive. There are some other cases when you can be confidant you are definitive. Like all religious beliefs either say there is no god, there is one God, or there are many gods. Zero, one or more than one. That clearly represents all possibilities. That sort of thing.
So no, this list is not definitive. I don't think this particular list is even a very good one.
answered Jul 26 at 20:28
JayJay
22.2k17 silver badges59 bronze badges
Most attempts at classifying things like this are completely arbitrary. Different writers will come up with different lists, and it's not like you could somehow prove that one is right and the others are wrong.
This reminds me ... nothing about writing, but about classifying. A friend of mine who had not gone to college as a young person decided to go when she was in her 40s. She thought maybe she could get an exemption from some introductory classes based on knowledge she had accumulated over the years. One class she tried to get out of was Politics 101. So she went to see the teacher. The teacher said, "Well, let's see if you know the material." She ten pulled out the textbook, flipped it open, and said, "What are the 7 functions of a political party?" My friend rattled off some things. The teacher said her answer was incomplete and refused to let her out of the class.
The funny part is: My friend was the president of a prestigious Political Action Committee. She was on a first name basis with senators and governors. Candidates struggled to win her endorsement. She probably knew more about politics than the teacher of this class. But because she could not come up with the same list of "the 7 functions of a political party" that were in the textbook, the teacher concluded she didn't know much about politics.
Coming up with a classification scheme in which everything clearly and unambiguously fits in one and only one category is tough. I can see lots of problems with this list. Couldn't a "rags to riches" story also be a comedy? When would "voyage and return" NOT be a "quest"? What about a romance story? That doesn't seem to fit any of these categories. Maybe the author would say that it's an example of "overcoming the monster" where the "monster" is what keeps the couple apart, but at that point he'd be saying that "monster" means any sort of problem, and almost every story is about overcoming some sort of problem, so that category includes all the others. Etc.
Furthermore, there are many ways one could classify stories, just as there are many ways that one could classify almost anything. You might divide stories into tragedy, comedy, romance, whatever you need to complete that list. (There's a funny conversation about this in Shakespeare's Hamlet.) Netflix divides stories into action, drama, horror, science fiction, romance, and new releases. (Maybe some others.) Stories are often classified as children, young adult, or adult. Or as short story vs novella vs novel. People will identify stories as "having a strong female main character" versus ... weak female characters, I guess. Etc etc.
You can come up with a "one and only one category" list if you have simple enough criteria. If you classify by a yes/no question, then everything is either yes or no, maybe you have to provide for maybe or mixed, and you can be confidant you have been definitive. There are some other cases when you can be confidant you are definitive. Like all religious beliefs either say there is no god, there is one God, or there are many gods. Zero, one or more than one. That clearly represents all possibilities. That sort of thing.
So no, this list is not definitive. I don't think this particular list is even a very good one.
answered Jul 26 at 20:28
JayJay
22.2k17 silver badges59 bronze badges
edited Jul 26 at 20:35
answered Jul 26 at 20:28
JayJay
22.2k17 silver badges59 bronze badges
answered Jul 26 at 20:28
JayJay
22.2k17 silver badges59 bronze badges
answered Jul 26 at 20:28
JayJay
22.2k17 silver badges59 bronze badges
22.2k17 silver badges59 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Riches to Rags. Typically this is a western song though.
A series of events. See Tom Sawyer. There's no real progression until the Deus Ex Machina of all that gold in the end, and Huck doesn't even like the result.
answered Jul 25 at 1:51
JoshuaJoshua
1234 bronze badges
add a comment |
Riches to Rags. Typically this is a western song though.
A series of events. See Tom Sawyer. There's no real progression until the Deus Ex Machina of all that gold in the end, and Huck doesn't even like the result.
answered Jul 25 at 1:51
JoshuaJoshua
1234 bronze badges
add a comment |
Riches to Rags. Typically this is a western song though.
A series of events. See Tom Sawyer. There's no real progression until the Deus Ex Machina of all that gold in the end, and Huck doesn't even like the result.
answered Jul 25 at 1:51
JoshuaJoshua
1234 bronze badges
Riches to Rags. Typically this is a western song though.
A series of events. See Tom Sawyer. There's no real progression until the Deus Ex Machina of all that gold in the end, and Huck doesn't even like the result.
answered Jul 25 at 1:51
JoshuaJoshua
1234 bronze badges
answered Jul 25 at 1:51
JoshuaJoshua
1234 bronze badges
answered Jul 25 at 1:51
JoshuaJoshua
1234 bronze badges
answered Jul 25 at 1:51
JoshuaJoshua
1234 bronze badges
1234 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46854%2fthe-seven-story-archetypes-are-they-truly-all-of-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
In theory, yes, but all of these are gigantic umbrellas and barely useful.
– Weckar E.
Jul 23 at 20:44
27
This list reads as if the creator was really struggling to come up with seven distinct archetypes, but wouldn't stop until he had seven. Overcoming the Monster is a Quest, Voyage and Return is a Quest, and Comedy/Tragedy are genres, not story archetypes. So really I only count three archetypes in that list. Who made this?
– PoorYorick
Jul 23 at 21:53
5
The Six Main Arcs in Storytelling, as Identified by an A.I.
– wetcircuit
Jul 23 at 22:27
25
In the words of Leo Tolstoy: "All great literature is one of three stories: a man goes on a journey, a stranger comes to town, and Godzilla versus Megashark."
– Sigma Ori
Jul 24 at 17:12
4
No. Aldous Huxley said there were 12. F. Scott Fitzgerald said there were two. There is no correct answer to this.
– user207421
Jul 26 at 8:12