Break equation in partsaligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizeUsing split to break a long equationEquation line break upline break in equationLeft aligning equations without align characterAdjusting the width of a displaymath environmentList of equations, including equation contents and captionLine Break in Equation with Textbreak an equationBreak equation without amsmath
How to decline physical affection from a child whose parents are pressuring them?
How to split a string in two substrings of same length using bash?
Calling GPL'ed socket server inside Docker?
Is the decompression of compressed and encrypted data without decryption also theoretically impossible?
How bad would a partial hash leak be, realistically?
Implement Homestuck's Catenative Doomsday Dice Cascader
OOP demonstration in C++17 using a Pokémon
When writing an error prompt, should we end the sentence with a exclamation mark or a dot?
Whats the next step after commercial fusion reactors?
Building a road to escape Earth's gravity by making a pyramid on Antartica
How to make a setting relevant?
Payment instructions from HomeAway look fishy to me
What risks are there when you clear your cookies instead of logging off?
Company did not petition for visa in a timely manner. Is asking me to work from overseas, but wants me to take a paycut
Do manufacturers try make their components as close to ideal ones as possible?
Completing the square to find if quadratic form is positive definite.
Ancestor born in Bristol City workhouse?
What happens to foam insulation board after you pour concrete slab?
Java guess the number
Why does the Schrödinger equation work so well for the Hydrogen atom despite the relativistic boundary at the nucleus?
What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?
Why don’t airliners have temporary liveries?
Traffic law UK, pedestrians
Secure offsite backup, even in the case of hacker root access
Break equation in parts
aligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizeUsing split to break a long equationEquation line break upline break in equationLeft aligning equations without align characterAdjusting the width of a displaymath environmentList of equations, including equation contents and captionLine Break in Equation with Textbreak an equationBreak equation without amsmath
5
I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac1-zeta 2)(fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-
2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta
2P_t-1+fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-2(1+zeta )))bigr\
+frac(1-zeta )4Bigl(fracE_t-2m_t+(fraczeta 2)(E_t-2P_t-
1+P_t-2)(1+zeta ))Bigr) \
+fraczeta 4(Bigl((P_t-1+P_t-2)Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument
It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?
equations amsmath
edited May 27 at 8:12
Andrew Swann
79.6k9140337
asked May 27 at 7:25
HenamHenam
965
New contributor
Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
5
I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac1-zeta 2)(fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-
2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta
2P_t-1+fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-2(1+zeta )))bigr\
+frac(1-zeta )4Bigl(fracE_t-2m_t+(fraczeta 2)(E_t-2P_t-
1+P_t-2)(1+zeta ))Bigr) \
+fraczeta 4(Bigl((P_t-1+P_t-2)Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument
It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?
equations amsmath
edited May 27 at 8:12
Andrew Swann
79.6k9140337
asked May 27 at 7:25
HenamHenam
965
New contributor
Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
)bigr\is applying bigr to\presumably you intendedbigr)\
– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18
add a comment |
5
5
5
1
I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac1-zeta 2)(fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-
2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta
2P_t-1+fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-2(1+zeta )))bigr\
+frac(1-zeta )4Bigl(fracE_t-2m_t+(fraczeta 2)(E_t-2P_t-
1+P_t-2)(1+zeta ))Bigr) \
+fraczeta 4(Bigl((P_t-1+P_t-2)Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument
It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?
equations amsmath
edited May 27 at 8:12
Andrew Swann
79.6k9140337
asked May 27 at 7:25
HenamHenam
965
New contributor
Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac1-zeta 2)(fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-
2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta
2P_t-1+fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-2(1+zeta )))bigr\
+frac(1-zeta )4Bigl(fracE_t-2m_t+(fraczeta 2)(E_t-2P_t-
1+P_t-2)(1+zeta ))Bigr) \
+fraczeta 4(Bigl((P_t-1+P_t-2)Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument
It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?
equations amsmath
equations amsmath
edited May 27 at 8:12
Andrew Swann
79.6k9140337
asked May 27 at 7:25
HenamHenam
965
New contributor
Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited May 27 at 8:12
Andrew Swann
79.6k9140337
asked May 27 at 7:25
HenamHenam
965
New contributor
Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited May 27 at 8:12
Andrew Swann
79.6k9140337
edited May 27 at 8:12
Andrew Swann
79.6k9140337
edited May 27 at 8:12
Andrew Swann
79.6k9140337
79.6k9140337
asked May 27 at 7:25
HenamHenam
965
New contributor
Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked May 27 at 7:25
HenamHenam
965
asked May 27 at 7:25
HenamHenam
965
965
New contributor
Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
)bigr\is applying bigr to\presumably you intendedbigr)\
– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18
add a comment |
1
)bigr\is applying bigr to\presumably you intendedbigr)\
– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18
1
1
)bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\ – David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
)bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\ – David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
1
You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[showframe]geometry
usepackageamsmath, nccmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
vspace*2ex
beginmultline*
P_t=
mfrac12biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac1-zeta 2,fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta 2P_t-1 +fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-21+zetabiggr) \
+frac1-zeta 4,fracE_t-2m_t+fraczeta 2(E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)1+zeta +fraczeta 4(P_t-1+P_t-2)
endmultline*
enddocument
answered May 27 at 8:32
BernardBernard
180k780212
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
I think you should replaceP_twithP_t... And, since the preamble features the instructionDeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances ofEin the mathy material withE.
– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
add a comment |
4
I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE % expectations operator
begindocument
beginalign*
P_t
&=frac12(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac14frac1-zeta1+zeta
biggl[E_t-1m_t +frac1-zeta2zeta E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta (1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+fraczeta2P_t-1+fraczeta1+zeta P_t-2
+E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta2 (E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)biggr]
+frac14zeta (P_t-1+P_t-2)
endalign*
enddocument
answered May 27 at 11:23
MicoMico
293k32402791
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
add a comment |
4
After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:
documentclassarticle
usepackagenccmath
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackageshowframe
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac1-zeta 2fracE_t-1m_t
+ mfrac1-zeta2zetaE_t-2m_t
+ mfraczeta(1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta1+zetaP_t-2
1+zetaBiggr) \
+ frac1-zeta4
fracE_t-2m_t + fraczeta2(E_t-2P_t-1
+ P_t-2)1+zeta
+ fraczeta 4Bigl(P_t-1+P_t-2Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument
(red lines indicate text borders)
answered May 27 at 8:20
ZarkoZarko
136k872180
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replacePi_twithP_t...
– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Henam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492822%2fbreak-equation-in-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
1
You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[showframe]geometry
usepackageamsmath, nccmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
vspace*2ex
beginmultline*
P_t=
mfrac12biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac1-zeta 2,fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta 2P_t-1 +fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-21+zetabiggr) \
+frac1-zeta 4,fracE_t-2m_t+fraczeta 2(E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)1+zeta +fraczeta 4(P_t-1+P_t-2)
endmultline*
enddocument
answered May 27 at 8:32
BernardBernard
180k780212
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
I think you should replaceP_twithP_t... And, since the preamble features the instructionDeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances ofEin the mathy material withE.
– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
add a comment |
1
You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[showframe]geometry
usepackageamsmath, nccmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
vspace*2ex
beginmultline*
P_t=
mfrac12biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac1-zeta 2,fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta 2P_t-1 +fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-21+zetabiggr) \
+frac1-zeta 4,fracE_t-2m_t+fraczeta 2(E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)1+zeta +fraczeta 4(P_t-1+P_t-2)
endmultline*
enddocument
answered May 27 at 8:32
BernardBernard
180k780212
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
I think you should replaceP_twithP_t... And, since the preamble features the instructionDeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances ofEin the mathy material withE.
– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
add a comment |
1
1
1
You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[showframe]geometry
usepackageamsmath, nccmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
vspace*2ex
beginmultline*
P_t=
mfrac12biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac1-zeta 2,fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta 2P_t-1 +fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-21+zetabiggr) \
+frac1-zeta 4,fracE_t-2m_t+fraczeta 2(E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)1+zeta +fraczeta 4(P_t-1+P_t-2)
endmultline*
enddocument
answered May 27 at 8:32
BernardBernard
180k780212
You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[showframe]geometry
usepackageamsmath, nccmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
vspace*2ex
beginmultline*
P_t=
mfrac12biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac1-zeta 2,fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta 2P_t-1 +fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-21+zetabiggr) \
+frac1-zeta 4,fracE_t-2m_t+fraczeta 2(E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)1+zeta +fraczeta 4(P_t-1+P_t-2)
endmultline*
enddocument
answered May 27 at 8:32
BernardBernard
180k780212
answered May 27 at 8:32
BernardBernard
180k780212
answered May 27 at 8:32
BernardBernard
180k780212
answered May 27 at 8:32
BernardBernard
180k780212
180k780212
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
I think you should replaceP_twithP_t... And, since the preamble features the instructionDeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances ofEin the mathy material withE.
– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
add a comment |
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
I think you should replaceP_twithP_t... And, since the preamble features the instructionDeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances ofEin the mathy material withE.
– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
1
I think you should replace
P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
I think you should replace
P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
add a comment |
4
I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE % expectations operator
begindocument
beginalign*
P_t
&=frac12(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac14frac1-zeta1+zeta
biggl[E_t-1m_t +frac1-zeta2zeta E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta (1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+fraczeta2P_t-1+fraczeta1+zeta P_t-2
+E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta2 (E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)biggr]
+frac14zeta (P_t-1+P_t-2)
endalign*
enddocument
answered May 27 at 11:23
MicoMico
293k32402791
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
add a comment |
4
I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE % expectations operator
begindocument
beginalign*
P_t
&=frac12(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac14frac1-zeta1+zeta
biggl[E_t-1m_t +frac1-zeta2zeta E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta (1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+fraczeta2P_t-1+fraczeta1+zeta P_t-2
+E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta2 (E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)biggr]
+frac14zeta (P_t-1+P_t-2)
endalign*
enddocument
answered May 27 at 11:23
MicoMico
293k32402791
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
add a comment |
4
4
4
I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE % expectations operator
begindocument
beginalign*
P_t
&=frac12(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac14frac1-zeta1+zeta
biggl[E_t-1m_t +frac1-zeta2zeta E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta (1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+fraczeta2P_t-1+fraczeta1+zeta P_t-2
+E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta2 (E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)biggr]
+frac14zeta (P_t-1+P_t-2)
endalign*
enddocument
answered May 27 at 11:23
MicoMico
293k32402791
I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE % expectations operator
begindocument
beginalign*
P_t
&=frac12(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac14frac1-zeta1+zeta
biggl[E_t-1m_t +frac1-zeta2zeta E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta (1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+fraczeta2P_t-1+fraczeta1+zeta P_t-2
+E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta2 (E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)biggr]
+frac14zeta (P_t-1+P_t-2)
endalign*
enddocument
answered May 27 at 11:23
MicoMico
293k32402791
answered May 27 at 11:23
MicoMico
293k32402791
answered May 27 at 11:23
MicoMico
293k32402791
answered May 27 at 11:23
MicoMico
293k32402791
293k32402791
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
add a comment |
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
1
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
add a comment |
4
After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:
documentclassarticle
usepackagenccmath
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackageshowframe
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac1-zeta 2fracE_t-1m_t
+ mfrac1-zeta2zetaE_t-2m_t
+ mfraczeta(1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta1+zetaP_t-2
1+zetaBiggr) \
+ frac1-zeta4
fracE_t-2m_t + fraczeta2(E_t-2P_t-1
+ P_t-2)1+zeta
+ fraczeta 4Bigl(P_t-1+P_t-2Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument
(red lines indicate text borders)
answered May 27 at 8:20
ZarkoZarko
136k872180
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replacePi_twithP_t...
– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
add a comment |
4
After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:
documentclassarticle
usepackagenccmath
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackageshowframe
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac1-zeta 2fracE_t-1m_t
+ mfrac1-zeta2zetaE_t-2m_t
+ mfraczeta(1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta1+zetaP_t-2
1+zetaBiggr) \
+ frac1-zeta4
fracE_t-2m_t + fraczeta2(E_t-2P_t-1
+ P_t-2)1+zeta
+ fraczeta 4Bigl(P_t-1+P_t-2Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument
(red lines indicate text borders)
answered May 27 at 8:20
ZarkoZarko
136k872180
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replacePi_twithP_t...
– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
add a comment |
4
4
4
After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:
documentclassarticle
usepackagenccmath
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackageshowframe
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac1-zeta 2fracE_t-1m_t
+ mfrac1-zeta2zetaE_t-2m_t
+ mfraczeta(1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta1+zetaP_t-2
1+zetaBiggr) \
+ frac1-zeta4
fracE_t-2m_t + fraczeta2(E_t-2P_t-1
+ P_t-2)1+zeta
+ fraczeta 4Bigl(P_t-1+P_t-2Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument
(red lines indicate text borders)
answered May 27 at 8:20
ZarkoZarko
136k872180
After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:
documentclassarticle
usepackagenccmath
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackageshowframe
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac1-zeta 2fracE_t-1m_t
+ mfrac1-zeta2zetaE_t-2m_t
+ mfraczeta(1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta1+zetaP_t-2
1+zetaBiggr) \
+ frac1-zeta4
fracE_t-2m_t + fraczeta2(E_t-2P_t-1
+ P_t-2)1+zeta
+ fraczeta 4Bigl(P_t-1+P_t-2Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument
(red lines indicate text borders)
answered May 27 at 8:20
ZarkoZarko
136k872180
edited May 27 at 11:32
answered May 27 at 8:20
ZarkoZarko
136k872180
answered May 27 at 8:20
ZarkoZarko
136k872180
answered May 27 at 8:20
ZarkoZarko
136k872180
136k872180
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replacePi_twithP_t...
– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
add a comment |
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replacePi_twithP_t...
– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replace
Pi_t with P_t...– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
I would replace
Pi_t with P_t...– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
add a comment |
Henam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Henam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Henam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Henam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492822%2fbreak-equation-in-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
)bigr\is applying bigr to\presumably you intendedbigr)\– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18