My professor has told me he will be the corresponding author. Will it hurt my future career?What is the explicit meaning of “corresponding author”?Can student be the corresponding author?What is the significance of the corresponding author?How to get rid of unwanted and annoying co-author?In Chinese academia, what is the significance of the corresponding author, beyond 'public relation'?What to do if the corresponding author is presumably dead?What is the explicit meaning of “corresponding author”?Should I include a grad student who only duplicated my calculations as an author on an article?Should I ask a journal for provided peer review when a corresponding author will not share communications?Do all authors have the right to access LaTeX source code of the PDF manuscript uploaded to a journal's portal by the corresponding author?Editor asked me why to change the corresponding author

Redirect https to fqdn

How might the United Kingdom become a republic?

What would the EU do if an EU member declared war on another EU member?

Replacements for swear words

If a specific mass of air is polluted, will the pollution stick with it?

Why does the autopilot disengage even when it does not receive pilot input?

Why did my rum cake turn black?

Why does resistance reduce when a conductive fabric is stretched?

Is there a way to perform "if" check only once instead of every iteration in a loop?

Are there any intersection of Theory A and Theory B?

Using Images for Points in ListPlot

Wrapper in return method for test class

Is purchasing foreign currency before going abroad a losing proposition?

How can I deal with a player trying to insert real-world mythology into my homebrew setting?

Dropping outliers based on "2.5 times the RMSE"

Repeating redundant information after dialogues, to avoid or not?

Crowbar circuit causes unexpected behavior for op amp circuit

Cubic programming and beyond?

Creating custom objects with custom properties using generics

How can one write good dialogue in a story without sounding wooden?

How to check the quality of an audio sample?

A DVR algebra with weird automorphisms

Does Google Maps take into account hills/inclines for route times?

Why isn't there research to build a standard lunar, or Martian mobility platform?



My professor has told me he will be the corresponding author. Will it hurt my future career?


What is the explicit meaning of “corresponding author”?Can student be the corresponding author?What is the significance of the corresponding author?How to get rid of unwanted and annoying co-author?In Chinese academia, what is the significance of the corresponding author, beyond 'public relation'?What to do if the corresponding author is presumably dead?What is the explicit meaning of “corresponding author”?Should I include a grad student who only duplicated my calculations as an author on an article?Should I ask a journal for provided peer review when a corresponding author will not share communications?Do all authors have the right to access LaTeX source code of the PDF manuscript uploaded to a journal's portal by the corresponding author?Editor asked me why to change the corresponding author






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








24















I recently got acceptance in an SCI journal, and my professor has told me that he will be a corresponding author (CA) even though I have done almost all the work.



Does not being the corresponding author hurt my chances, as I am looking to start an academic career very soon. Should I ask my professor to be the CA instead?



My professor is a real nice guy and has taught me a lot, but I am concerned in this case. Any suggestions?



Edit: My field is Electrical Engineering and Computer Networks specifically.










share|improve this question



















  • 9





    You are going to be the first author, right? and it is always customary that the supervisor would be the correspondent, the most important thing is to make sure you are the first author.

    – Monika
    Jul 4 at 10:40






  • 21





    No, nobody will get that impression.

    – Anonymous Physicist
    Jul 4 at 11:11






  • 49





    What field are you in? In my field, "corresponding author" means literally "The person who filled in the web form to submit the paper" and is a completely pointless vestige of days gone by.

    – David Richerby
    Jul 4 at 19:21






  • 15





    Please edit your question and tell us your field because this sort of things varies enormously between fields. In biology, for example, what you describe is absolutely standard: the 1st author is the one who did all the work and the corresponding author (the last author) is the PI/professor/supervisor etc.

    – terdon
    Jul 4 at 19:25






  • 7





    Hmmm .. in addition to being the person who filled out the web form the corresponding author is the one to whom the editors will direct reviewer responses and forward any correspondence they receive for the authors. It is usual to pick someone whose addresses can be expected to be fairly permanent.

    – dmckee
    Jul 5 at 15:39

















24















I recently got acceptance in an SCI journal, and my professor has told me that he will be a corresponding author (CA) even though I have done almost all the work.



Does not being the corresponding author hurt my chances, as I am looking to start an academic career very soon. Should I ask my professor to be the CA instead?



My professor is a real nice guy and has taught me a lot, but I am concerned in this case. Any suggestions?



Edit: My field is Electrical Engineering and Computer Networks specifically.










share|improve this question



















  • 9





    You are going to be the first author, right? and it is always customary that the supervisor would be the correspondent, the most important thing is to make sure you are the first author.

    – Monika
    Jul 4 at 10:40






  • 21





    No, nobody will get that impression.

    – Anonymous Physicist
    Jul 4 at 11:11






  • 49





    What field are you in? In my field, "corresponding author" means literally "The person who filled in the web form to submit the paper" and is a completely pointless vestige of days gone by.

    – David Richerby
    Jul 4 at 19:21






  • 15





    Please edit your question and tell us your field because this sort of things varies enormously between fields. In biology, for example, what you describe is absolutely standard: the 1st author is the one who did all the work and the corresponding author (the last author) is the PI/professor/supervisor etc.

    – terdon
    Jul 4 at 19:25






  • 7





    Hmmm .. in addition to being the person who filled out the web form the corresponding author is the one to whom the editors will direct reviewer responses and forward any correspondence they receive for the authors. It is usual to pick someone whose addresses can be expected to be fairly permanent.

    – dmckee
    Jul 5 at 15:39













24












24








24


1






I recently got acceptance in an SCI journal, and my professor has told me that he will be a corresponding author (CA) even though I have done almost all the work.



Does not being the corresponding author hurt my chances, as I am looking to start an academic career very soon. Should I ask my professor to be the CA instead?



My professor is a real nice guy and has taught me a lot, but I am concerned in this case. Any suggestions?



Edit: My field is Electrical Engineering and Computer Networks specifically.










share|improve this question
















I recently got acceptance in an SCI journal, and my professor has told me that he will be a corresponding author (CA) even though I have done almost all the work.



Does not being the corresponding author hurt my chances, as I am looking to start an academic career very soon. Should I ask my professor to be the CA instead?



My professor is a real nice guy and has taught me a lot, but I am concerned in this case. Any suggestions?



Edit: My field is Electrical Engineering and Computer Networks specifically.







authorship correspondence






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 6 at 4:47







Sjaffry

















asked Jul 4 at 10:29









SjaffrySjaffry

1,0505 silver badges18 bronze badges




1,0505 silver badges18 bronze badges







  • 9





    You are going to be the first author, right? and it is always customary that the supervisor would be the correspondent, the most important thing is to make sure you are the first author.

    – Monika
    Jul 4 at 10:40






  • 21





    No, nobody will get that impression.

    – Anonymous Physicist
    Jul 4 at 11:11






  • 49





    What field are you in? In my field, "corresponding author" means literally "The person who filled in the web form to submit the paper" and is a completely pointless vestige of days gone by.

    – David Richerby
    Jul 4 at 19:21






  • 15





    Please edit your question and tell us your field because this sort of things varies enormously between fields. In biology, for example, what you describe is absolutely standard: the 1st author is the one who did all the work and the corresponding author (the last author) is the PI/professor/supervisor etc.

    – terdon
    Jul 4 at 19:25






  • 7





    Hmmm .. in addition to being the person who filled out the web form the corresponding author is the one to whom the editors will direct reviewer responses and forward any correspondence they receive for the authors. It is usual to pick someone whose addresses can be expected to be fairly permanent.

    – dmckee
    Jul 5 at 15:39












  • 9





    You are going to be the first author, right? and it is always customary that the supervisor would be the correspondent, the most important thing is to make sure you are the first author.

    – Monika
    Jul 4 at 10:40






  • 21





    No, nobody will get that impression.

    – Anonymous Physicist
    Jul 4 at 11:11






  • 49





    What field are you in? In my field, "corresponding author" means literally "The person who filled in the web form to submit the paper" and is a completely pointless vestige of days gone by.

    – David Richerby
    Jul 4 at 19:21






  • 15





    Please edit your question and tell us your field because this sort of things varies enormously between fields. In biology, for example, what you describe is absolutely standard: the 1st author is the one who did all the work and the corresponding author (the last author) is the PI/professor/supervisor etc.

    – terdon
    Jul 4 at 19:25






  • 7





    Hmmm .. in addition to being the person who filled out the web form the corresponding author is the one to whom the editors will direct reviewer responses and forward any correspondence they receive for the authors. It is usual to pick someone whose addresses can be expected to be fairly permanent.

    – dmckee
    Jul 5 at 15:39







9




9





You are going to be the first author, right? and it is always customary that the supervisor would be the correspondent, the most important thing is to make sure you are the first author.

– Monika
Jul 4 at 10:40





You are going to be the first author, right? and it is always customary that the supervisor would be the correspondent, the most important thing is to make sure you are the first author.

– Monika
Jul 4 at 10:40




21




21





No, nobody will get that impression.

– Anonymous Physicist
Jul 4 at 11:11





No, nobody will get that impression.

– Anonymous Physicist
Jul 4 at 11:11




49




49





What field are you in? In my field, "corresponding author" means literally "The person who filled in the web form to submit the paper" and is a completely pointless vestige of days gone by.

– David Richerby
Jul 4 at 19:21





What field are you in? In my field, "corresponding author" means literally "The person who filled in the web form to submit the paper" and is a completely pointless vestige of days gone by.

– David Richerby
Jul 4 at 19:21




15




15





Please edit your question and tell us your field because this sort of things varies enormously between fields. In biology, for example, what you describe is absolutely standard: the 1st author is the one who did all the work and the corresponding author (the last author) is the PI/professor/supervisor etc.

– terdon
Jul 4 at 19:25





Please edit your question and tell us your field because this sort of things varies enormously between fields. In biology, for example, what you describe is absolutely standard: the 1st author is the one who did all the work and the corresponding author (the last author) is the PI/professor/supervisor etc.

– terdon
Jul 4 at 19:25




7




7





Hmmm .. in addition to being the person who filled out the web form the corresponding author is the one to whom the editors will direct reviewer responses and forward any correspondence they receive for the authors. It is usual to pick someone whose addresses can be expected to be fairly permanent.

– dmckee
Jul 5 at 15:39





Hmmm .. in addition to being the person who filled out the web form the corresponding author is the one to whom the editors will direct reviewer responses and forward any correspondence they receive for the authors. It is usual to pick someone whose addresses can be expected to be fairly permanent.

– dmckee
Jul 5 at 15:39










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















56














First, take time to read this question to understand what does the Corresponding Author mean for different publishers. The definitions vary, but in principle CA is the author who can be contacted about the paper results after the publication, including the long-term period (10+ years). Perhaps, you are the best person to act as a CA for this paper? Do ask yourself the following questions:



  1. How certain is that you will be working in academia in the next 1 year? 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? What about your Professor?

  2. If you provide your current contact details (address, email) as a CA, how likely is that your correspondence will reach you at this address in 1 year? 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? What about your Professor?

  3. A CA may receive some specific questions about the study, but also broader questions about possible ways how it can be changed, adapted for a new problem, applied to a particular area in another discipline. There may be questions on how the methods used in the study compare to what other groups were doing or are planning to do. Are you fully prepared to answer these questions? What about your Professor?

If based on the answers, you decide that you are the best person to act as a CA, simply initiate a discussion with your Professor, using your answers as key points of your proposal.






share|improve this answer























  • In general the first author is the student and the last is the professor. A student or post doc is mostly judged on first-author papers. A professor is mostly judged by last author papers. Middle authors are less important, and represent minor contributors. How this fits in with CA I am not sure, maybe ask the journal?

    – Kevin Kostlan
    Jul 5 at 4:29







  • 19





    @KevinKostlan: Might be true for your field. Alphabetic sorting is common in other field. And in some field the professor is always first author and the student doing all the work is the last (like sorting by academic rank).

    – usr1234567
    Jul 5 at 7:42











  • I also thought the corresponding author in some cases had to be the academic who was member. At least back when I was at university there were several professors who were CAs merely because they were members of that association - and the setup worked like a merit gateway (CA's first judge if it has merit, then apply)

    – Stian Yttervik
    Jul 5 at 11:26







  • 1





    @StianYttervik I think that used to be more common when things like "Journal of the <Society>" or "Proceedings of the <Society>" were taken more literally. The journals were strictly for <Society> members, and thus in order to submit an article there, you needed to be a member of <Society>. -- However, many journals these days (even "Journal/Proceedings of the" ones) have moved to a more open submission format, and no longer require membership to submit articles.

    – R.M.
    Jul 5 at 19:23


















8














It is not a problem for your career not to be the corresponding author on this paper, and there is no reason to problematise it. But you should be the first author on the author list, given what you've said about the distribution of work.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    ...assuming you're in a field that orders authors by contribution, rather than alphabetically.

    – JeffE
    Jul 7 at 5:42


















0














Some journals will allow multiple corresponding authors if you request it of the editor. It might be a decent compromise if your professor is ok with it.






share|improve this answer






























    -2














    It's the norm. Arguably it should not be the norm (like advisors tacking on to papers where they did zero work). But it is the norm. The idea is grad students are little mayflies and the prof has corporate memory. So roll with it. First author is still more important. Also, make sure you get to publicize the work at conferences, etc.



    I like the spirit though. Keep looking out for number one.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 8





      "First author is still more important" - that is field specific.

      – Martin Bonner
      Jul 5 at 8:15






    • 2





      "it should not be the norm" - this depends entirely on what "corresponding author" means.

      – O. R. Mapper
      Jul 5 at 17:46













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132877%2fmy-professor-has-told-me-he-will-be-the-corresponding-author-will-it-hurt-my-fu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    56














    First, take time to read this question to understand what does the Corresponding Author mean for different publishers. The definitions vary, but in principle CA is the author who can be contacted about the paper results after the publication, including the long-term period (10+ years). Perhaps, you are the best person to act as a CA for this paper? Do ask yourself the following questions:



    1. How certain is that you will be working in academia in the next 1 year? 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? What about your Professor?

    2. If you provide your current contact details (address, email) as a CA, how likely is that your correspondence will reach you at this address in 1 year? 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? What about your Professor?

    3. A CA may receive some specific questions about the study, but also broader questions about possible ways how it can be changed, adapted for a new problem, applied to a particular area in another discipline. There may be questions on how the methods used in the study compare to what other groups were doing or are planning to do. Are you fully prepared to answer these questions? What about your Professor?

    If based on the answers, you decide that you are the best person to act as a CA, simply initiate a discussion with your Professor, using your answers as key points of your proposal.






    share|improve this answer























    • In general the first author is the student and the last is the professor. A student or post doc is mostly judged on first-author papers. A professor is mostly judged by last author papers. Middle authors are less important, and represent minor contributors. How this fits in with CA I am not sure, maybe ask the journal?

      – Kevin Kostlan
      Jul 5 at 4:29







    • 19





      @KevinKostlan: Might be true for your field. Alphabetic sorting is common in other field. And in some field the professor is always first author and the student doing all the work is the last (like sorting by academic rank).

      – usr1234567
      Jul 5 at 7:42











    • I also thought the corresponding author in some cases had to be the academic who was member. At least back when I was at university there were several professors who were CAs merely because they were members of that association - and the setup worked like a merit gateway (CA's first judge if it has merit, then apply)

      – Stian Yttervik
      Jul 5 at 11:26







    • 1





      @StianYttervik I think that used to be more common when things like "Journal of the <Society>" or "Proceedings of the <Society>" were taken more literally. The journals were strictly for <Society> members, and thus in order to submit an article there, you needed to be a member of <Society>. -- However, many journals these days (even "Journal/Proceedings of the" ones) have moved to a more open submission format, and no longer require membership to submit articles.

      – R.M.
      Jul 5 at 19:23















    56














    First, take time to read this question to understand what does the Corresponding Author mean for different publishers. The definitions vary, but in principle CA is the author who can be contacted about the paper results after the publication, including the long-term period (10+ years). Perhaps, you are the best person to act as a CA for this paper? Do ask yourself the following questions:



    1. How certain is that you will be working in academia in the next 1 year? 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? What about your Professor?

    2. If you provide your current contact details (address, email) as a CA, how likely is that your correspondence will reach you at this address in 1 year? 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? What about your Professor?

    3. A CA may receive some specific questions about the study, but also broader questions about possible ways how it can be changed, adapted for a new problem, applied to a particular area in another discipline. There may be questions on how the methods used in the study compare to what other groups were doing or are planning to do. Are you fully prepared to answer these questions? What about your Professor?

    If based on the answers, you decide that you are the best person to act as a CA, simply initiate a discussion with your Professor, using your answers as key points of your proposal.






    share|improve this answer























    • In general the first author is the student and the last is the professor. A student or post doc is mostly judged on first-author papers. A professor is mostly judged by last author papers. Middle authors are less important, and represent minor contributors. How this fits in with CA I am not sure, maybe ask the journal?

      – Kevin Kostlan
      Jul 5 at 4:29







    • 19





      @KevinKostlan: Might be true for your field. Alphabetic sorting is common in other field. And in some field the professor is always first author and the student doing all the work is the last (like sorting by academic rank).

      – usr1234567
      Jul 5 at 7:42











    • I also thought the corresponding author in some cases had to be the academic who was member. At least back when I was at university there were several professors who were CAs merely because they were members of that association - and the setup worked like a merit gateway (CA's first judge if it has merit, then apply)

      – Stian Yttervik
      Jul 5 at 11:26







    • 1





      @StianYttervik I think that used to be more common when things like "Journal of the <Society>" or "Proceedings of the <Society>" were taken more literally. The journals were strictly for <Society> members, and thus in order to submit an article there, you needed to be a member of <Society>. -- However, many journals these days (even "Journal/Proceedings of the" ones) have moved to a more open submission format, and no longer require membership to submit articles.

      – R.M.
      Jul 5 at 19:23













    56












    56








    56







    First, take time to read this question to understand what does the Corresponding Author mean for different publishers. The definitions vary, but in principle CA is the author who can be contacted about the paper results after the publication, including the long-term period (10+ years). Perhaps, you are the best person to act as a CA for this paper? Do ask yourself the following questions:



    1. How certain is that you will be working in academia in the next 1 year? 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? What about your Professor?

    2. If you provide your current contact details (address, email) as a CA, how likely is that your correspondence will reach you at this address in 1 year? 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? What about your Professor?

    3. A CA may receive some specific questions about the study, but also broader questions about possible ways how it can be changed, adapted for a new problem, applied to a particular area in another discipline. There may be questions on how the methods used in the study compare to what other groups were doing or are planning to do. Are you fully prepared to answer these questions? What about your Professor?

    If based on the answers, you decide that you are the best person to act as a CA, simply initiate a discussion with your Professor, using your answers as key points of your proposal.






    share|improve this answer













    First, take time to read this question to understand what does the Corresponding Author mean for different publishers. The definitions vary, but in principle CA is the author who can be contacted about the paper results after the publication, including the long-term period (10+ years). Perhaps, you are the best person to act as a CA for this paper? Do ask yourself the following questions:



    1. How certain is that you will be working in academia in the next 1 year? 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? What about your Professor?

    2. If you provide your current contact details (address, email) as a CA, how likely is that your correspondence will reach you at this address in 1 year? 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? What about your Professor?

    3. A CA may receive some specific questions about the study, but also broader questions about possible ways how it can be changed, adapted for a new problem, applied to a particular area in another discipline. There may be questions on how the methods used in the study compare to what other groups were doing or are planning to do. Are you fully prepared to answer these questions? What about your Professor?

    If based on the answers, you decide that you are the best person to act as a CA, simply initiate a discussion with your Professor, using your answers as key points of your proposal.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jul 4 at 10:44









    Dmitry SavostyanovDmitry Savostyanov

    27.7k10 gold badges59 silver badges113 bronze badges




    27.7k10 gold badges59 silver badges113 bronze badges












    • In general the first author is the student and the last is the professor. A student or post doc is mostly judged on first-author papers. A professor is mostly judged by last author papers. Middle authors are less important, and represent minor contributors. How this fits in with CA I am not sure, maybe ask the journal?

      – Kevin Kostlan
      Jul 5 at 4:29







    • 19





      @KevinKostlan: Might be true for your field. Alphabetic sorting is common in other field. And in some field the professor is always first author and the student doing all the work is the last (like sorting by academic rank).

      – usr1234567
      Jul 5 at 7:42











    • I also thought the corresponding author in some cases had to be the academic who was member. At least back when I was at university there were several professors who were CAs merely because they were members of that association - and the setup worked like a merit gateway (CA's first judge if it has merit, then apply)

      – Stian Yttervik
      Jul 5 at 11:26







    • 1





      @StianYttervik I think that used to be more common when things like "Journal of the <Society>" or "Proceedings of the <Society>" were taken more literally. The journals were strictly for <Society> members, and thus in order to submit an article there, you needed to be a member of <Society>. -- However, many journals these days (even "Journal/Proceedings of the" ones) have moved to a more open submission format, and no longer require membership to submit articles.

      – R.M.
      Jul 5 at 19:23

















    • In general the first author is the student and the last is the professor. A student or post doc is mostly judged on first-author papers. A professor is mostly judged by last author papers. Middle authors are less important, and represent minor contributors. How this fits in with CA I am not sure, maybe ask the journal?

      – Kevin Kostlan
      Jul 5 at 4:29







    • 19





      @KevinKostlan: Might be true for your field. Alphabetic sorting is common in other field. And in some field the professor is always first author and the student doing all the work is the last (like sorting by academic rank).

      – usr1234567
      Jul 5 at 7:42











    • I also thought the corresponding author in some cases had to be the academic who was member. At least back when I was at university there were several professors who were CAs merely because they were members of that association - and the setup worked like a merit gateway (CA's first judge if it has merit, then apply)

      – Stian Yttervik
      Jul 5 at 11:26







    • 1





      @StianYttervik I think that used to be more common when things like "Journal of the <Society>" or "Proceedings of the <Society>" were taken more literally. The journals were strictly for <Society> members, and thus in order to submit an article there, you needed to be a member of <Society>. -- However, many journals these days (even "Journal/Proceedings of the" ones) have moved to a more open submission format, and no longer require membership to submit articles.

      – R.M.
      Jul 5 at 19:23
















    In general the first author is the student and the last is the professor. A student or post doc is mostly judged on first-author papers. A professor is mostly judged by last author papers. Middle authors are less important, and represent minor contributors. How this fits in with CA I am not sure, maybe ask the journal?

    – Kevin Kostlan
    Jul 5 at 4:29






    In general the first author is the student and the last is the professor. A student or post doc is mostly judged on first-author papers. A professor is mostly judged by last author papers. Middle authors are less important, and represent minor contributors. How this fits in with CA I am not sure, maybe ask the journal?

    – Kevin Kostlan
    Jul 5 at 4:29





    19




    19





    @KevinKostlan: Might be true for your field. Alphabetic sorting is common in other field. And in some field the professor is always first author and the student doing all the work is the last (like sorting by academic rank).

    – usr1234567
    Jul 5 at 7:42





    @KevinKostlan: Might be true for your field. Alphabetic sorting is common in other field. And in some field the professor is always first author and the student doing all the work is the last (like sorting by academic rank).

    – usr1234567
    Jul 5 at 7:42













    I also thought the corresponding author in some cases had to be the academic who was member. At least back when I was at university there were several professors who were CAs merely because they were members of that association - and the setup worked like a merit gateway (CA's first judge if it has merit, then apply)

    – Stian Yttervik
    Jul 5 at 11:26






    I also thought the corresponding author in some cases had to be the academic who was member. At least back when I was at university there were several professors who were CAs merely because they were members of that association - and the setup worked like a merit gateway (CA's first judge if it has merit, then apply)

    – Stian Yttervik
    Jul 5 at 11:26





    1




    1





    @StianYttervik I think that used to be more common when things like "Journal of the <Society>" or "Proceedings of the <Society>" were taken more literally. The journals were strictly for <Society> members, and thus in order to submit an article there, you needed to be a member of <Society>. -- However, many journals these days (even "Journal/Proceedings of the" ones) have moved to a more open submission format, and no longer require membership to submit articles.

    – R.M.
    Jul 5 at 19:23





    @StianYttervik I think that used to be more common when things like "Journal of the <Society>" or "Proceedings of the <Society>" were taken more literally. The journals were strictly for <Society> members, and thus in order to submit an article there, you needed to be a member of <Society>. -- However, many journals these days (even "Journal/Proceedings of the" ones) have moved to a more open submission format, and no longer require membership to submit articles.

    – R.M.
    Jul 5 at 19:23













    8














    It is not a problem for your career not to be the corresponding author on this paper, and there is no reason to problematise it. But you should be the first author on the author list, given what you've said about the distribution of work.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      ...assuming you're in a field that orders authors by contribution, rather than alphabetically.

      – JeffE
      Jul 7 at 5:42















    8














    It is not a problem for your career not to be the corresponding author on this paper, and there is no reason to problematise it. But you should be the first author on the author list, given what you've said about the distribution of work.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      ...assuming you're in a field that orders authors by contribution, rather than alphabetically.

      – JeffE
      Jul 7 at 5:42













    8












    8








    8







    It is not a problem for your career not to be the corresponding author on this paper, and there is no reason to problematise it. But you should be the first author on the author list, given what you've said about the distribution of work.






    share|improve this answer













    It is not a problem for your career not to be the corresponding author on this paper, and there is no reason to problematise it. But you should be the first author on the author list, given what you've said about the distribution of work.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jul 5 at 14:43









    Michael Krabbe BorregaardMichael Krabbe Borregaard

    811 bronze badge




    811 bronze badge







    • 1





      ...assuming you're in a field that orders authors by contribution, rather than alphabetically.

      – JeffE
      Jul 7 at 5:42












    • 1





      ...assuming you're in a field that orders authors by contribution, rather than alphabetically.

      – JeffE
      Jul 7 at 5:42







    1




    1





    ...assuming you're in a field that orders authors by contribution, rather than alphabetically.

    – JeffE
    Jul 7 at 5:42





    ...assuming you're in a field that orders authors by contribution, rather than alphabetically.

    – JeffE
    Jul 7 at 5:42











    0














    Some journals will allow multiple corresponding authors if you request it of the editor. It might be a decent compromise if your professor is ok with it.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      Some journals will allow multiple corresponding authors if you request it of the editor. It might be a decent compromise if your professor is ok with it.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        Some journals will allow multiple corresponding authors if you request it of the editor. It might be a decent compromise if your professor is ok with it.






        share|improve this answer













        Some journals will allow multiple corresponding authors if you request it of the editor. It might be a decent compromise if your professor is ok with it.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jul 5 at 14:20









        prudentAIprudentAI

        411 bronze badge




        411 bronze badge





















            -2














            It's the norm. Arguably it should not be the norm (like advisors tacking on to papers where they did zero work). But it is the norm. The idea is grad students are little mayflies and the prof has corporate memory. So roll with it. First author is still more important. Also, make sure you get to publicize the work at conferences, etc.



            I like the spirit though. Keep looking out for number one.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 8





              "First author is still more important" - that is field specific.

              – Martin Bonner
              Jul 5 at 8:15






            • 2





              "it should not be the norm" - this depends entirely on what "corresponding author" means.

              – O. R. Mapper
              Jul 5 at 17:46















            -2














            It's the norm. Arguably it should not be the norm (like advisors tacking on to papers where they did zero work). But it is the norm. The idea is grad students are little mayflies and the prof has corporate memory. So roll with it. First author is still more important. Also, make sure you get to publicize the work at conferences, etc.



            I like the spirit though. Keep looking out for number one.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 8





              "First author is still more important" - that is field specific.

              – Martin Bonner
              Jul 5 at 8:15






            • 2





              "it should not be the norm" - this depends entirely on what "corresponding author" means.

              – O. R. Mapper
              Jul 5 at 17:46













            -2












            -2








            -2







            It's the norm. Arguably it should not be the norm (like advisors tacking on to papers where they did zero work). But it is the norm. The idea is grad students are little mayflies and the prof has corporate memory. So roll with it. First author is still more important. Also, make sure you get to publicize the work at conferences, etc.



            I like the spirit though. Keep looking out for number one.






            share|improve this answer













            It's the norm. Arguably it should not be the norm (like advisors tacking on to papers where they did zero work). But it is the norm. The idea is grad students are little mayflies and the prof has corporate memory. So roll with it. First author is still more important. Also, make sure you get to publicize the work at conferences, etc.



            I like the spirit though. Keep looking out for number one.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jul 4 at 20:49









            guestguest

            1283 bronze badges




            1283 bronze badges







            • 8





              "First author is still more important" - that is field specific.

              – Martin Bonner
              Jul 5 at 8:15






            • 2





              "it should not be the norm" - this depends entirely on what "corresponding author" means.

              – O. R. Mapper
              Jul 5 at 17:46












            • 8





              "First author is still more important" - that is field specific.

              – Martin Bonner
              Jul 5 at 8:15






            • 2





              "it should not be the norm" - this depends entirely on what "corresponding author" means.

              – O. R. Mapper
              Jul 5 at 17:46







            8




            8





            "First author is still more important" - that is field specific.

            – Martin Bonner
            Jul 5 at 8:15





            "First author is still more important" - that is field specific.

            – Martin Bonner
            Jul 5 at 8:15




            2




            2





            "it should not be the norm" - this depends entirely on what "corresponding author" means.

            – O. R. Mapper
            Jul 5 at 17:46





            "it should not be the norm" - this depends entirely on what "corresponding author" means.

            – O. R. Mapper
            Jul 5 at 17:46

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132877%2fmy-professor-has-told-me-he-will-be-the-corresponding-author-will-it-hurt-my-fu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Get product attribute by attribute group code in magento 2get product attribute by product attribute group in magento 2Magento 2 Log Bundle Product Data in List Page?How to get all product attribute of a attribute group of Default attribute set?Magento 2.1 Create a filter in the product grid by new attributeMagento 2 : Get Product Attribute values By GroupMagento 2 How to get all existing values for one attributeMagento 2 get custom attribute of a single product inside a pluginMagento 2.3 How to get all the Multi Source Inventory (MSI) locations collection in custom module?Magento2: how to develop rest API to get new productsGet product attribute by attribute group code ( [attribute_group_code] ) in magento 2

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Magento 2.3: How do i solve this, Not registered handle, on custom form?How can i rewrite TierPrice Block in Magento2magento 2 captcha not rendering if I override layout xmlmain.CRITICAL: Plugin class doesn't existMagento 2 : Problem while adding custom button order view page?Magento 2.2.5: Overriding Admin Controller sales/orderMagento 2.2.5: Add, Update and Delete existing products Custom OptionsMagento 2.3 : File Upload issue in UI Component FormMagento2 Not registered handleHow to configured Form Builder Js in my custom magento 2.3.0 module?Magento 2.3. How to create image upload field in an admin form