Is it incorrect to write “I rate this book a 3 out of 4 stars?”Use of the definite article “the” before “church”What colour eyesQuestion on indefinite article (Part 2)Using “the” or “a” for an item already mentionedThis book is the property ofWhich indefinite article to use if the noun starts with a non-letter character?Why is “any” not classified as an article?Could it be that 'an another' is acceptable usage?Which Sunday do you prefer, if Sunday is OK with you?What/such + [indefinite article] + uncountable noun (without an adjective)

Avoiding racist tropes in fantasy

Is there any practical application for performing a double Fourier transform? ...or an inverse Fourier transform on a time-domain input?

How to prevent cutting edges on my TV, HDMI-connected?

Accent on í misaligned in bibliography / citation

Cross-referencing enumerate item

Are modern clipless shoes and pedals that much better than toe clips and straps?

Compelling story with the world as a villain

Is a player able to change alignment midway through an adventure?

Why does trim() NOT remove char 160?

Is there any way to keep a player from killing an NPC?

Why is Boris Johnson visiting only Paris & Berlin if every member of the EU needs to agree on a withdrawal deal?

What magic extends life or grants immortality?

Is it possible to get crispy, crunchy carrots from canned carrots?

Can I double-dip a flight and claim it for both United and Lufthansa status miles?

What is the history of the university asylum law?

Was there ever a treaty between 2 entities with significantly different translations to the detriment of one party?

In the MCU, why does Mjölnir retain its enchantments after Ragnarok?

Can't stopover at Sapporo when going from Asahikawa to Chitose airport?

Most practical knots for hitching a line to an object while keeping the bitter end as tight as possible, without sag?

If the first law of thermodynamics ensures conservation of energy, why does it allow systems to lose energy?

how do you harvest carrots in creative mode

Sun setting in East!

What is wrong about this application of Kirchhoffs Current Law?

Mathematical uses of string theory



Is it incorrect to write “I rate this book a 3 out of 4 stars?”


Use of the definite article “the” before “church”What colour eyesQuestion on indefinite article (Part 2)Using “the” or “a” for an item already mentionedThis book is the property ofWhich indefinite article to use if the noun starts with a non-letter character?Why is “any” not classified as an article?Could it be that 'an another' is acceptable usage?Which Sunday do you prefer, if Sunday is OK with you?What/such + [indefinite article] + uncountable noun (without an adjective)






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








10















I was informed by a new editor that the sentence "I rate this book a 3 out of 4 stars" is incorrect. In the words of the editor - ""A" is wrongly inserted; you have already used "this" as a determiner, and there is no need for another one."



Could you please help me understand if this is true?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    "I give this book a rating of 3 out of 4 stars" would be clear. I agree with the editor that there is something wrong with using "a" referring to "rating" without using "rating" explicitly.

    – Greg Lee
    Aug 10 at 17:42






  • 1





    I find "a" perfectly acceptable. The argument about this already present is incorrect too. this goes with book. "A" goes with 3.

    – Jim
    Aug 10 at 19:07











  • If prior to this sentence you have mentioned "this book" you may want to replace "this book" by "the book". This is my conjecture about why the editor is complaining about using 'this'.

    – Pablo Straub
    Aug 13 at 21:48

















10















I was informed by a new editor that the sentence "I rate this book a 3 out of 4 stars" is incorrect. In the words of the editor - ""A" is wrongly inserted; you have already used "this" as a determiner, and there is no need for another one."



Could you please help me understand if this is true?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    "I give this book a rating of 3 out of 4 stars" would be clear. I agree with the editor that there is something wrong with using "a" referring to "rating" without using "rating" explicitly.

    – Greg Lee
    Aug 10 at 17:42






  • 1





    I find "a" perfectly acceptable. The argument about this already present is incorrect too. this goes with book. "A" goes with 3.

    – Jim
    Aug 10 at 19:07











  • If prior to this sentence you have mentioned "this book" you may want to replace "this book" by "the book". This is my conjecture about why the editor is complaining about using 'this'.

    – Pablo Straub
    Aug 13 at 21:48













10












10








10


2






I was informed by a new editor that the sentence "I rate this book a 3 out of 4 stars" is incorrect. In the words of the editor - ""A" is wrongly inserted; you have already used "this" as a determiner, and there is no need for another one."



Could you please help me understand if this is true?










share|improve this question














I was informed by a new editor that the sentence "I rate this book a 3 out of 4 stars" is incorrect. In the words of the editor - ""A" is wrongly inserted; you have already used "this" as a determiner, and there is no need for another one."



Could you please help me understand if this is true?







indefinite-articles






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 10 at 17:09









AWandPAWandP

534 bronze badges




534 bronze badges










  • 1





    "I give this book a rating of 3 out of 4 stars" would be clear. I agree with the editor that there is something wrong with using "a" referring to "rating" without using "rating" explicitly.

    – Greg Lee
    Aug 10 at 17:42






  • 1





    I find "a" perfectly acceptable. The argument about this already present is incorrect too. this goes with book. "A" goes with 3.

    – Jim
    Aug 10 at 19:07











  • If prior to this sentence you have mentioned "this book" you may want to replace "this book" by "the book". This is my conjecture about why the editor is complaining about using 'this'.

    – Pablo Straub
    Aug 13 at 21:48












  • 1





    "I give this book a rating of 3 out of 4 stars" would be clear. I agree with the editor that there is something wrong with using "a" referring to "rating" without using "rating" explicitly.

    – Greg Lee
    Aug 10 at 17:42






  • 1





    I find "a" perfectly acceptable. The argument about this already present is incorrect too. this goes with book. "A" goes with 3.

    – Jim
    Aug 10 at 19:07











  • If prior to this sentence you have mentioned "this book" you may want to replace "this book" by "the book". This is my conjecture about why the editor is complaining about using 'this'.

    – Pablo Straub
    Aug 13 at 21:48







1




1





"I give this book a rating of 3 out of 4 stars" would be clear. I agree with the editor that there is something wrong with using "a" referring to "rating" without using "rating" explicitly.

– Greg Lee
Aug 10 at 17:42





"I give this book a rating of 3 out of 4 stars" would be clear. I agree with the editor that there is something wrong with using "a" referring to "rating" without using "rating" explicitly.

– Greg Lee
Aug 10 at 17:42




1




1





I find "a" perfectly acceptable. The argument about this already present is incorrect too. this goes with book. "A" goes with 3.

– Jim
Aug 10 at 19:07





I find "a" perfectly acceptable. The argument about this already present is incorrect too. this goes with book. "A" goes with 3.

– Jim
Aug 10 at 19:07













If prior to this sentence you have mentioned "this book" you may want to replace "this book" by "the book". This is my conjecture about why the editor is complaining about using 'this'.

– Pablo Straub
Aug 13 at 21:48





If prior to this sentence you have mentioned "this book" you may want to replace "this book" by "the book". This is my conjecture about why the editor is complaining about using 'this'.

– Pablo Straub
Aug 13 at 21:48










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















12















Both "I rate this book three out of four stars" and "I rate this book a three out of four stars" sound acceptable to me.



"I rate this book a three" seems grammatical to me (although maybe "I give this book a three" would be a more common verb in that kind of sentence). So I think the use of the indefinite article would remain grammatical when the additional clarifying information "...out of four stars" is added to the end of the sentence. "Three" would function in that context as a noun, I guess.



If there were some reason to consider it incorrect to use "a" here, it would not be because of the presence of this earlier in the sentence. This acts as the determiner for the noun book; the article a, which comes after book, is clearly not meant to be a determiner for book.




Based on a comment by tchrist, my current hypothesis is that speakers who object to your sentence don't find it natural to interpret "a three out of four stars" as "a three (out of four stars)", the way I did in the second paragraph of this post. I think that most people would accept "rate/give it a three out of four", with no following noun. For some reason, adding a noun after the second numeral seems to potentially change the interpretation of the first numeral's grammatical role.






share|improve this answer






















  • 12





    I have trouble parsing "a three stars".

    – tchrist
    Aug 10 at 17:26











  • @tchrist: ...which doesn't occur anywhere in the sentence. I don't think "a three out of four stars" necessarily behaves the same grammatically as *"a three stars out of four stars", which does sound fairly unacceptable to me.

    – sumelic
    Aug 10 at 17:28






  • 4





    I mostly agree with this answer. For the past 40 or 50 years, U.S. idiomatic English has employed the notion of "a ten" meaning "a rating of ten [on a scale of one to ten]." Given that widespread usage. Given that usage and its variants (such as "a ten out of ten"), the inclusion of the unit of measure (whether it be stars, dog bones, smiley faces, or dollar signs) is beside the point: what is being offered isn't a number of stars for the recipient to take home and use—it's an incremental position on a limited number line relative to other incremental positions; the unit of measure is trivial.

    – Sven Yargs
    Aug 10 at 17:59












  • It would also make sense if it were I give this book a (three out of four stars) review. The absence of review might be assumed to be present, even though it's missing. That would make it an attributive noun phrase without the final noun actually being stated. Of course, in the actual sentence, it's rate that's used, not give. But it has the same kind of feel about it.

    – Jason Bassford
    Aug 10 at 21:30












  • In the end, is this really a question of grammaticality or of style?

    – Mari-Lou A
    Aug 11 at 4:26


















2















When writing about points or scores, I prefer digits to words.



If we accept that there is no problem with "a score of 3"




a score of 90%
a score of 3–2

He had an IQ score of 120




Source: Longman Dictionary



Then something that scores 3 stars, is perfectly fine



  • a score of 3 stars

When the context is clear, such as a restaurant, book or movie review, the grade refers to a score, which can be anything: badges, stars, chef hats etc.



  • I rate it a 3 out of 4 stars

In other words

   I rate this book a 3 [out of 4 stars]

   This book has a [score of] 3 out of 4 stars



If the determiner e.g. this is used with one noun, another determiner can be used with a different noun or plural noun phrase in the same sentence. For example,




  • The match ended in a draw


  • My house had a market value of $700,000


  • That table costs a whopping 4,000 euros





share|improve this answer


































    1















    Your editor does not sound like a native English speaker. They may understand the grammatical rules of English, but they do not have an ear for the language.



    A good editor who grew up with English would never say "'A' is wrongly inserted; you have already used 'this' as a determiner, and there is no need for another one."



    That's just not how English works, and that one sentence is a terrible piece of writing.



    I would not trust writing advice from anyone who writes like that.



    Your original sentence does sound better without the "a", but it's still not quite right.



    A great editor would have an easy answer for you: "Why don't you try this: 'I rate this book 3 stars out of 4.'"



    That is pretty close to the ideal way of writing what you want to say here.






    share|improve this answer
































      0















      The "a" refers to "rating" which is understood and not to the noun "book". The sentence is awkward and the meaning could be made clearer though I do understand what is meant.






      share|improve this answer



























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "97"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507959%2fis-it-incorrect-to-write-i-rate-this-book-a-3-out-of-4-stars%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        12















        Both "I rate this book three out of four stars" and "I rate this book a three out of four stars" sound acceptable to me.



        "I rate this book a three" seems grammatical to me (although maybe "I give this book a three" would be a more common verb in that kind of sentence). So I think the use of the indefinite article would remain grammatical when the additional clarifying information "...out of four stars" is added to the end of the sentence. "Three" would function in that context as a noun, I guess.



        If there were some reason to consider it incorrect to use "a" here, it would not be because of the presence of this earlier in the sentence. This acts as the determiner for the noun book; the article a, which comes after book, is clearly not meant to be a determiner for book.




        Based on a comment by tchrist, my current hypothesis is that speakers who object to your sentence don't find it natural to interpret "a three out of four stars" as "a three (out of four stars)", the way I did in the second paragraph of this post. I think that most people would accept "rate/give it a three out of four", with no following noun. For some reason, adding a noun after the second numeral seems to potentially change the interpretation of the first numeral's grammatical role.






        share|improve this answer






















        • 12





          I have trouble parsing "a three stars".

          – tchrist
          Aug 10 at 17:26











        • @tchrist: ...which doesn't occur anywhere in the sentence. I don't think "a three out of four stars" necessarily behaves the same grammatically as *"a three stars out of four stars", which does sound fairly unacceptable to me.

          – sumelic
          Aug 10 at 17:28






        • 4





          I mostly agree with this answer. For the past 40 or 50 years, U.S. idiomatic English has employed the notion of "a ten" meaning "a rating of ten [on a scale of one to ten]." Given that widespread usage. Given that usage and its variants (such as "a ten out of ten"), the inclusion of the unit of measure (whether it be stars, dog bones, smiley faces, or dollar signs) is beside the point: what is being offered isn't a number of stars for the recipient to take home and use—it's an incremental position on a limited number line relative to other incremental positions; the unit of measure is trivial.

          – Sven Yargs
          Aug 10 at 17:59












        • It would also make sense if it were I give this book a (three out of four stars) review. The absence of review might be assumed to be present, even though it's missing. That would make it an attributive noun phrase without the final noun actually being stated. Of course, in the actual sentence, it's rate that's used, not give. But it has the same kind of feel about it.

          – Jason Bassford
          Aug 10 at 21:30












        • In the end, is this really a question of grammaticality or of style?

          – Mari-Lou A
          Aug 11 at 4:26















        12















        Both "I rate this book three out of four stars" and "I rate this book a three out of four stars" sound acceptable to me.



        "I rate this book a three" seems grammatical to me (although maybe "I give this book a three" would be a more common verb in that kind of sentence). So I think the use of the indefinite article would remain grammatical when the additional clarifying information "...out of four stars" is added to the end of the sentence. "Three" would function in that context as a noun, I guess.



        If there were some reason to consider it incorrect to use "a" here, it would not be because of the presence of this earlier in the sentence. This acts as the determiner for the noun book; the article a, which comes after book, is clearly not meant to be a determiner for book.




        Based on a comment by tchrist, my current hypothesis is that speakers who object to your sentence don't find it natural to interpret "a three out of four stars" as "a three (out of four stars)", the way I did in the second paragraph of this post. I think that most people would accept "rate/give it a three out of four", with no following noun. For some reason, adding a noun after the second numeral seems to potentially change the interpretation of the first numeral's grammatical role.






        share|improve this answer






















        • 12





          I have trouble parsing "a three stars".

          – tchrist
          Aug 10 at 17:26











        • @tchrist: ...which doesn't occur anywhere in the sentence. I don't think "a three out of four stars" necessarily behaves the same grammatically as *"a three stars out of four stars", which does sound fairly unacceptable to me.

          – sumelic
          Aug 10 at 17:28






        • 4





          I mostly agree with this answer. For the past 40 or 50 years, U.S. idiomatic English has employed the notion of "a ten" meaning "a rating of ten [on a scale of one to ten]." Given that widespread usage. Given that usage and its variants (such as "a ten out of ten"), the inclusion of the unit of measure (whether it be stars, dog bones, smiley faces, or dollar signs) is beside the point: what is being offered isn't a number of stars for the recipient to take home and use—it's an incremental position on a limited number line relative to other incremental positions; the unit of measure is trivial.

          – Sven Yargs
          Aug 10 at 17:59












        • It would also make sense if it were I give this book a (three out of four stars) review. The absence of review might be assumed to be present, even though it's missing. That would make it an attributive noun phrase without the final noun actually being stated. Of course, in the actual sentence, it's rate that's used, not give. But it has the same kind of feel about it.

          – Jason Bassford
          Aug 10 at 21:30












        • In the end, is this really a question of grammaticality or of style?

          – Mari-Lou A
          Aug 11 at 4:26













        12














        12










        12









        Both "I rate this book three out of four stars" and "I rate this book a three out of four stars" sound acceptable to me.



        "I rate this book a three" seems grammatical to me (although maybe "I give this book a three" would be a more common verb in that kind of sentence). So I think the use of the indefinite article would remain grammatical when the additional clarifying information "...out of four stars" is added to the end of the sentence. "Three" would function in that context as a noun, I guess.



        If there were some reason to consider it incorrect to use "a" here, it would not be because of the presence of this earlier in the sentence. This acts as the determiner for the noun book; the article a, which comes after book, is clearly not meant to be a determiner for book.




        Based on a comment by tchrist, my current hypothesis is that speakers who object to your sentence don't find it natural to interpret "a three out of four stars" as "a three (out of four stars)", the way I did in the second paragraph of this post. I think that most people would accept "rate/give it a three out of four", with no following noun. For some reason, adding a noun after the second numeral seems to potentially change the interpretation of the first numeral's grammatical role.






        share|improve this answer















        Both "I rate this book three out of four stars" and "I rate this book a three out of four stars" sound acceptable to me.



        "I rate this book a three" seems grammatical to me (although maybe "I give this book a three" would be a more common verb in that kind of sentence). So I think the use of the indefinite article would remain grammatical when the additional clarifying information "...out of four stars" is added to the end of the sentence. "Three" would function in that context as a noun, I guess.



        If there were some reason to consider it incorrect to use "a" here, it would not be because of the presence of this earlier in the sentence. This acts as the determiner for the noun book; the article a, which comes after book, is clearly not meant to be a determiner for book.




        Based on a comment by tchrist, my current hypothesis is that speakers who object to your sentence don't find it natural to interpret "a three out of four stars" as "a three (out of four stars)", the way I did in the second paragraph of this post. I think that most people would accept "rate/give it a three out of four", with no following noun. For some reason, adding a noun after the second numeral seems to potentially change the interpretation of the first numeral's grammatical role.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Aug 10 at 17:44

























        answered Aug 10 at 17:23









        sumelicsumelic

        56.6k8 gold badges134 silver badges248 bronze badges




        56.6k8 gold badges134 silver badges248 bronze badges










        • 12





          I have trouble parsing "a three stars".

          – tchrist
          Aug 10 at 17:26











        • @tchrist: ...which doesn't occur anywhere in the sentence. I don't think "a three out of four stars" necessarily behaves the same grammatically as *"a three stars out of four stars", which does sound fairly unacceptable to me.

          – sumelic
          Aug 10 at 17:28






        • 4





          I mostly agree with this answer. For the past 40 or 50 years, U.S. idiomatic English has employed the notion of "a ten" meaning "a rating of ten [on a scale of one to ten]." Given that widespread usage. Given that usage and its variants (such as "a ten out of ten"), the inclusion of the unit of measure (whether it be stars, dog bones, smiley faces, or dollar signs) is beside the point: what is being offered isn't a number of stars for the recipient to take home and use—it's an incremental position on a limited number line relative to other incremental positions; the unit of measure is trivial.

          – Sven Yargs
          Aug 10 at 17:59












        • It would also make sense if it were I give this book a (three out of four stars) review. The absence of review might be assumed to be present, even though it's missing. That would make it an attributive noun phrase without the final noun actually being stated. Of course, in the actual sentence, it's rate that's used, not give. But it has the same kind of feel about it.

          – Jason Bassford
          Aug 10 at 21:30












        • In the end, is this really a question of grammaticality or of style?

          – Mari-Lou A
          Aug 11 at 4:26












        • 12





          I have trouble parsing "a three stars".

          – tchrist
          Aug 10 at 17:26











        • @tchrist: ...which doesn't occur anywhere in the sentence. I don't think "a three out of four stars" necessarily behaves the same grammatically as *"a three stars out of four stars", which does sound fairly unacceptable to me.

          – sumelic
          Aug 10 at 17:28






        • 4





          I mostly agree with this answer. For the past 40 or 50 years, U.S. idiomatic English has employed the notion of "a ten" meaning "a rating of ten [on a scale of one to ten]." Given that widespread usage. Given that usage and its variants (such as "a ten out of ten"), the inclusion of the unit of measure (whether it be stars, dog bones, smiley faces, or dollar signs) is beside the point: what is being offered isn't a number of stars for the recipient to take home and use—it's an incremental position on a limited number line relative to other incremental positions; the unit of measure is trivial.

          – Sven Yargs
          Aug 10 at 17:59












        • It would also make sense if it were I give this book a (three out of four stars) review. The absence of review might be assumed to be present, even though it's missing. That would make it an attributive noun phrase without the final noun actually being stated. Of course, in the actual sentence, it's rate that's used, not give. But it has the same kind of feel about it.

          – Jason Bassford
          Aug 10 at 21:30












        • In the end, is this really a question of grammaticality or of style?

          – Mari-Lou A
          Aug 11 at 4:26







        12




        12





        I have trouble parsing "a three stars".

        – tchrist
        Aug 10 at 17:26





        I have trouble parsing "a three stars".

        – tchrist
        Aug 10 at 17:26













        @tchrist: ...which doesn't occur anywhere in the sentence. I don't think "a three out of four stars" necessarily behaves the same grammatically as *"a three stars out of four stars", which does sound fairly unacceptable to me.

        – sumelic
        Aug 10 at 17:28





        @tchrist: ...which doesn't occur anywhere in the sentence. I don't think "a three out of four stars" necessarily behaves the same grammatically as *"a three stars out of four stars", which does sound fairly unacceptable to me.

        – sumelic
        Aug 10 at 17:28




        4




        4





        I mostly agree with this answer. For the past 40 or 50 years, U.S. idiomatic English has employed the notion of "a ten" meaning "a rating of ten [on a scale of one to ten]." Given that widespread usage. Given that usage and its variants (such as "a ten out of ten"), the inclusion of the unit of measure (whether it be stars, dog bones, smiley faces, or dollar signs) is beside the point: what is being offered isn't a number of stars for the recipient to take home and use—it's an incremental position on a limited number line relative to other incremental positions; the unit of measure is trivial.

        – Sven Yargs
        Aug 10 at 17:59






        I mostly agree with this answer. For the past 40 or 50 years, U.S. idiomatic English has employed the notion of "a ten" meaning "a rating of ten [on a scale of one to ten]." Given that widespread usage. Given that usage and its variants (such as "a ten out of ten"), the inclusion of the unit of measure (whether it be stars, dog bones, smiley faces, or dollar signs) is beside the point: what is being offered isn't a number of stars for the recipient to take home and use—it's an incremental position on a limited number line relative to other incremental positions; the unit of measure is trivial.

        – Sven Yargs
        Aug 10 at 17:59














        It would also make sense if it were I give this book a (three out of four stars) review. The absence of review might be assumed to be present, even though it's missing. That would make it an attributive noun phrase without the final noun actually being stated. Of course, in the actual sentence, it's rate that's used, not give. But it has the same kind of feel about it.

        – Jason Bassford
        Aug 10 at 21:30






        It would also make sense if it were I give this book a (three out of four stars) review. The absence of review might be assumed to be present, even though it's missing. That would make it an attributive noun phrase without the final noun actually being stated. Of course, in the actual sentence, it's rate that's used, not give. But it has the same kind of feel about it.

        – Jason Bassford
        Aug 10 at 21:30














        In the end, is this really a question of grammaticality or of style?

        – Mari-Lou A
        Aug 11 at 4:26





        In the end, is this really a question of grammaticality or of style?

        – Mari-Lou A
        Aug 11 at 4:26













        2















        When writing about points or scores, I prefer digits to words.



        If we accept that there is no problem with "a score of 3"




        a score of 90%
        a score of 3–2

        He had an IQ score of 120




        Source: Longman Dictionary



        Then something that scores 3 stars, is perfectly fine



        • a score of 3 stars

        When the context is clear, such as a restaurant, book or movie review, the grade refers to a score, which can be anything: badges, stars, chef hats etc.



        • I rate it a 3 out of 4 stars

        In other words

           I rate this book a 3 [out of 4 stars]

           This book has a [score of] 3 out of 4 stars



        If the determiner e.g. this is used with one noun, another determiner can be used with a different noun or plural noun phrase in the same sentence. For example,




        • The match ended in a draw


        • My house had a market value of $700,000


        • That table costs a whopping 4,000 euros





        share|improve this answer































          2















          When writing about points or scores, I prefer digits to words.



          If we accept that there is no problem with "a score of 3"




          a score of 90%
          a score of 3–2

          He had an IQ score of 120




          Source: Longman Dictionary



          Then something that scores 3 stars, is perfectly fine



          • a score of 3 stars

          When the context is clear, such as a restaurant, book or movie review, the grade refers to a score, which can be anything: badges, stars, chef hats etc.



          • I rate it a 3 out of 4 stars

          In other words

             I rate this book a 3 [out of 4 stars]

             This book has a [score of] 3 out of 4 stars



          If the determiner e.g. this is used with one noun, another determiner can be used with a different noun or plural noun phrase in the same sentence. For example,




          • The match ended in a draw


          • My house had a market value of $700,000


          • That table costs a whopping 4,000 euros





          share|improve this answer





























            2














            2










            2









            When writing about points or scores, I prefer digits to words.



            If we accept that there is no problem with "a score of 3"




            a score of 90%
            a score of 3–2

            He had an IQ score of 120




            Source: Longman Dictionary



            Then something that scores 3 stars, is perfectly fine



            • a score of 3 stars

            When the context is clear, such as a restaurant, book or movie review, the grade refers to a score, which can be anything: badges, stars, chef hats etc.



            • I rate it a 3 out of 4 stars

            In other words

               I rate this book a 3 [out of 4 stars]

               This book has a [score of] 3 out of 4 stars



            If the determiner e.g. this is used with one noun, another determiner can be used with a different noun or plural noun phrase in the same sentence. For example,




            • The match ended in a draw


            • My house had a market value of $700,000


            • That table costs a whopping 4,000 euros





            share|improve this answer















            When writing about points or scores, I prefer digits to words.



            If we accept that there is no problem with "a score of 3"




            a score of 90%
            a score of 3–2

            He had an IQ score of 120




            Source: Longman Dictionary



            Then something that scores 3 stars, is perfectly fine



            • a score of 3 stars

            When the context is clear, such as a restaurant, book or movie review, the grade refers to a score, which can be anything: badges, stars, chef hats etc.



            • I rate it a 3 out of 4 stars

            In other words

               I rate this book a 3 [out of 4 stars]

               This book has a [score of] 3 out of 4 stars



            If the determiner e.g. this is used with one noun, another determiner can be used with a different noun or plural noun phrase in the same sentence. For example,




            • The match ended in a draw


            • My house had a market value of $700,000


            • That table costs a whopping 4,000 euros






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Aug 12 at 8:10

























            answered Aug 11 at 4:48









            Mari-Lou AMari-Lou A

            64.1k59 gold badges240 silver badges490 bronze badges




            64.1k59 gold badges240 silver badges490 bronze badges
























                1















                Your editor does not sound like a native English speaker. They may understand the grammatical rules of English, but they do not have an ear for the language.



                A good editor who grew up with English would never say "'A' is wrongly inserted; you have already used 'this' as a determiner, and there is no need for another one."



                That's just not how English works, and that one sentence is a terrible piece of writing.



                I would not trust writing advice from anyone who writes like that.



                Your original sentence does sound better without the "a", but it's still not quite right.



                A great editor would have an easy answer for you: "Why don't you try this: 'I rate this book 3 stars out of 4.'"



                That is pretty close to the ideal way of writing what you want to say here.






                share|improve this answer





























                  1















                  Your editor does not sound like a native English speaker. They may understand the grammatical rules of English, but they do not have an ear for the language.



                  A good editor who grew up with English would never say "'A' is wrongly inserted; you have already used 'this' as a determiner, and there is no need for another one."



                  That's just not how English works, and that one sentence is a terrible piece of writing.



                  I would not trust writing advice from anyone who writes like that.



                  Your original sentence does sound better without the "a", but it's still not quite right.



                  A great editor would have an easy answer for you: "Why don't you try this: 'I rate this book 3 stars out of 4.'"



                  That is pretty close to the ideal way of writing what you want to say here.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    1














                    1










                    1









                    Your editor does not sound like a native English speaker. They may understand the grammatical rules of English, but they do not have an ear for the language.



                    A good editor who grew up with English would never say "'A' is wrongly inserted; you have already used 'this' as a determiner, and there is no need for another one."



                    That's just not how English works, and that one sentence is a terrible piece of writing.



                    I would not trust writing advice from anyone who writes like that.



                    Your original sentence does sound better without the "a", but it's still not quite right.



                    A great editor would have an easy answer for you: "Why don't you try this: 'I rate this book 3 stars out of 4.'"



                    That is pretty close to the ideal way of writing what you want to say here.






                    share|improve this answer













                    Your editor does not sound like a native English speaker. They may understand the grammatical rules of English, but they do not have an ear for the language.



                    A good editor who grew up with English would never say "'A' is wrongly inserted; you have already used 'this' as a determiner, and there is no need for another one."



                    That's just not how English works, and that one sentence is a terrible piece of writing.



                    I would not trust writing advice from anyone who writes like that.



                    Your original sentence does sound better without the "a", but it's still not quite right.



                    A great editor would have an easy answer for you: "Why don't you try this: 'I rate this book 3 stars out of 4.'"



                    That is pretty close to the ideal way of writing what you want to say here.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Aug 12 at 4:16









                    Michael GearyMichael Geary

                    2021 silver badge4 bronze badges




                    2021 silver badge4 bronze badges
























                        0















                        The "a" refers to "rating" which is understood and not to the noun "book". The sentence is awkward and the meaning could be made clearer though I do understand what is meant.






                        share|improve this answer





























                          0















                          The "a" refers to "rating" which is understood and not to the noun "book". The sentence is awkward and the meaning could be made clearer though I do understand what is meant.






                          share|improve this answer



























                            0














                            0










                            0









                            The "a" refers to "rating" which is understood and not to the noun "book". The sentence is awkward and the meaning could be made clearer though I do understand what is meant.






                            share|improve this answer













                            The "a" refers to "rating" which is understood and not to the noun "book". The sentence is awkward and the meaning could be made clearer though I do understand what is meant.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Aug 13 at 19:00









                            Aled CymroAled Cymro

                            3161 silver badge5 bronze badges




                            3161 silver badge5 bronze badges






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507959%2fis-it-incorrect-to-write-i-rate-this-book-a-3-out-of-4-stars%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Get product attribute by attribute group code in magento 2get product attribute by product attribute group in magento 2Magento 2 Log Bundle Product Data in List Page?How to get all product attribute of a attribute group of Default attribute set?Magento 2.1 Create a filter in the product grid by new attributeMagento 2 : Get Product Attribute values By GroupMagento 2 How to get all existing values for one attributeMagento 2 get custom attribute of a single product inside a pluginMagento 2.3 How to get all the Multi Source Inventory (MSI) locations collection in custom module?Magento2: how to develop rest API to get new productsGet product attribute by attribute group code ( [attribute_group_code] ) in magento 2

                                Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                                Magento 2.3: How do i solve this, Not registered handle, on custom form?How can i rewrite TierPrice Block in Magento2magento 2 captcha not rendering if I override layout xmlmain.CRITICAL: Plugin class doesn't existMagento 2 : Problem while adding custom button order view page?Magento 2.2.5: Overriding Admin Controller sales/orderMagento 2.2.5: Add, Update and Delete existing products Custom OptionsMagento 2.3 : File Upload issue in UI Component FormMagento2 Not registered handleHow to configured Form Builder Js in my custom magento 2.3.0 module?Magento 2.3. How to create image upload field in an admin form