Removing Doubles Destroy TopologyTopology modelingTips for proper topologyProblem with bad topologyTopology question regarding vehicleTopology: Sphere to planeWhat is the function of “removing doubles UV”Remove doubles isn't removing overlapping verticesTopology improvements?'Remove Doubles' is removing vertices that don't overlap. Whats wrong?Removing Doubles Ruins Mesh of My Character
Why does this if-statement combining assignment and an equality check return true?
Need to understand my home electrical meter to see why bill is so high and/or if neighbor is on same meter
What is a fully qualified name?
Find the three digit Prime number P from the given unusual relationships
Parallel fifths in the orchestra
Popcorn is the only acceptable snack to consume while watching a movie
Does this strict reading of the rules allow both Extra Attack and the Thirsting Blade warlock invocation to be used together?
Alternatives to achieve certain output format
How to let other coworkers know that I don't share my coworker's political views?
Did this character show any indication of wanting to rule before S8E6?
In general, would I need to season a meat when making a sauce?
Defining the standard model of PA so that a space alien could understand
How to patch glass cuts in a bicycle tire?
A steel cutting sword?
When the Torah was almost lost and one (or several) Rabbis saved it?
Access to the path 'c:somepath' is denied for MSSQL CLR
Is it true that cut time means "play twice as fast as written"?
How to respond to upset student?
Does pair production happen even when the photon is around a neutron?
My employer faked my resume to acquire projects
What is the difference between singing and speaking?
Why did Theresa May offer a vote on a second Brexit referendum?
Why did the person in charge of a principality not just declare themself king?
What was the idiom for something that we take without a doubt?
Removing Doubles Destroy Topology
Topology modelingTips for proper topologyProblem with bad topologyTopology question regarding vehicleTopology: Sphere to planeWhat is the function of “removing doubles UV”Remove doubles isn't removing overlapping verticesTopology improvements?'Remove Doubles' is removing vertices that don't overlap. Whats wrong?Removing Doubles Ruins Mesh of My Character
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
304
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
304
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
304
$endgroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
modeling topology
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
304
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
304
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
304
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
304
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
304
304
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "502"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fblender.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140917%2fremoving-doubles-destroy-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
$endgroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
986
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Blender Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fblender.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140917%2fremoving-doubles-destroy-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
