Would the shaking of an earthquake be visible to somebody in a low-flying aircraft?What does it mean when the depth of earthquakes get near the surface over a period of time?Confusion on the Nepal earthquake expert statementsWhy is a mild earthquake often mistaken as dizziness or vertigo?Does the moon have any affect on earthquakes being created?Comparing the 4th of August 1998 earthquake to the 16th of April 2016 earthquake in EcuadorWhat is that spooky humming sound heard in earthquake footages?Why do loose, soft soils amplify earthquake vibrations rather than dampening them?What is the largest earthquake attributable solely to volcanic activityHi, is there good reference this raw earthquake data to covert into PGA, PGV and etc?What is the lateral ground acceleration, at the fault line, during a strike-slip earthquake?
May the tower use the runway while an emergency aircraft is inbound?
Are there any rules on how characters go from 0th to 1st level in a class?
Is a USB 3.0 device possible with a four contact USB 2.0 connector?
Why won't the Republicans use a superdelegate system like the DNC in their nomination process?
Why should I pay for an SSL certificate?
What's the relationship betweeen MS-DOS and XENIX?
Select elements of a list by comparing it to another list
global variant of csname…endcsname
How would armour (and combat) change if the fighter didn't need to actually wear it?
What are the advantages of this gold finger shape?
Is there a way, other than having a Diviner friend, for a player to avoid rolling Initiative at the start of a combat?
Unconventional examples of mathematical modelling
Expressing a chain of boolean ORs using ILP
What would be synonyms for "be into sth"?
Physical Interpretation of an Overdamped Pendulum
Do I need to start off my book by describing the character's "normal world"?
If a person claims to know anything could it be disproven by saying 'prove that we are not in a simulation'?
Resource is refusing to do a handover before leaving
How does the Moon's gravity affect Earth's oceans despite Earth's stronger gravitational pull?
Would getting a natural 20 with a penalty still count as a critical hit?
Why do aircraft leave cruising altitude long before landing just to circle?
Have there ever been other TV shows or Films that told a similiar story to the new 90210 show?
What is the purpose/function of this power inductor in parallel?
Why do we use low resistance cables to minimize power losses?
Would the shaking of an earthquake be visible to somebody in a low-flying aircraft?
What does it mean when the depth of earthquakes get near the surface over a period of time?Confusion on the Nepal earthquake expert statementsWhy is a mild earthquake often mistaken as dizziness or vertigo?Does the moon have any affect on earthquakes being created?Comparing the 4th of August 1998 earthquake to the 16th of April 2016 earthquake in EcuadorWhat is that spooky humming sound heard in earthquake footages?Why do loose, soft soils amplify earthquake vibrations rather than dampening them?What is the largest earthquake attributable solely to volcanic activityHi, is there good reference this raw earthquake data to covert into PGA, PGV and etc?What is the lateral ground acceleration, at the fault line, during a strike-slip earthquake?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
If you are in an airplane well above ground level, but low enough to see the faces of people relatively easily, and an earthquake happens, will you see the ground shake?
earthquakes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you are in an airplane well above ground level, but low enough to see the faces of people relatively easily, and an earthquake happens, will you see the ground shake?
earthquakes
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hi carl sagan, welcome to the site. It's an interesting question. I've edited your title to relate to what you're asking.
$endgroup$
– Semidiurnal Simon
Aug 5 at 5:37
1
$begingroup$
@SemidiurnalSimon youtube.com/watch?v=m1tvMuXYtwI "Roger is that tower shaking or what ?"
$endgroup$
– gansub
Aug 5 at 5:52
7
$begingroup$
Is the plane "well above ground level" or "low enough to see the faces of people relatively easily"? The first suggests at least several hundred feet; the latter, at most a few tens of feet. Which is it?
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Aug 5 at 13:57
3
$begingroup$
You can't easily see the faces of people from a low-flying airplane. Of the GA Cessna 172/Piper Cherokee type, anyway. (Maybe from an ultralight or purpose-designed bush plane that can fly really slowly.) Then you'd have the problem of distinguishing ground motion from your motion...
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Aug 5 at 17:19
$begingroup$
You might be able to see ground motion like this: youtube.com/watch?v=7lPbCvwbhOg
$endgroup$
– Keith McClary
Aug 6 at 2:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you are in an airplane well above ground level, but low enough to see the faces of people relatively easily, and an earthquake happens, will you see the ground shake?
earthquakes
$endgroup$
If you are in an airplane well above ground level, but low enough to see the faces of people relatively easily, and an earthquake happens, will you see the ground shake?
earthquakes
earthquakes
edited Aug 5 at 5:36
Semidiurnal Simon
3,9821 gold badge13 silver badges36 bronze badges
3,9821 gold badge13 silver badges36 bronze badges
asked Aug 5 at 4:39
carl sagancarl sagan
513 bronze badges
513 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Hi carl sagan, welcome to the site. It's an interesting question. I've edited your title to relate to what you're asking.
$endgroup$
– Semidiurnal Simon
Aug 5 at 5:37
1
$begingroup$
@SemidiurnalSimon youtube.com/watch?v=m1tvMuXYtwI "Roger is that tower shaking or what ?"
$endgroup$
– gansub
Aug 5 at 5:52
7
$begingroup$
Is the plane "well above ground level" or "low enough to see the faces of people relatively easily"? The first suggests at least several hundred feet; the latter, at most a few tens of feet. Which is it?
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Aug 5 at 13:57
3
$begingroup$
You can't easily see the faces of people from a low-flying airplane. Of the GA Cessna 172/Piper Cherokee type, anyway. (Maybe from an ultralight or purpose-designed bush plane that can fly really slowly.) Then you'd have the problem of distinguishing ground motion from your motion...
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Aug 5 at 17:19
$begingroup$
You might be able to see ground motion like this: youtube.com/watch?v=7lPbCvwbhOg
$endgroup$
– Keith McClary
Aug 6 at 2:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hi carl sagan, welcome to the site. It's an interesting question. I've edited your title to relate to what you're asking.
$endgroup$
– Semidiurnal Simon
Aug 5 at 5:37
1
$begingroup$
@SemidiurnalSimon youtube.com/watch?v=m1tvMuXYtwI "Roger is that tower shaking or what ?"
$endgroup$
– gansub
Aug 5 at 5:52
7
$begingroup$
Is the plane "well above ground level" or "low enough to see the faces of people relatively easily"? The first suggests at least several hundred feet; the latter, at most a few tens of feet. Which is it?
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Aug 5 at 13:57
3
$begingroup$
You can't easily see the faces of people from a low-flying airplane. Of the GA Cessna 172/Piper Cherokee type, anyway. (Maybe from an ultralight or purpose-designed bush plane that can fly really slowly.) Then you'd have the problem of distinguishing ground motion from your motion...
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Aug 5 at 17:19
$begingroup$
You might be able to see ground motion like this: youtube.com/watch?v=7lPbCvwbhOg
$endgroup$
– Keith McClary
Aug 6 at 2:22
$begingroup$
Hi carl sagan, welcome to the site. It's an interesting question. I've edited your title to relate to what you're asking.
$endgroup$
– Semidiurnal Simon
Aug 5 at 5:37
$begingroup$
Hi carl sagan, welcome to the site. It's an interesting question. I've edited your title to relate to what you're asking.
$endgroup$
– Semidiurnal Simon
Aug 5 at 5:37
1
1
$begingroup$
@SemidiurnalSimon youtube.com/watch?v=m1tvMuXYtwI "Roger is that tower shaking or what ?"
$endgroup$
– gansub
Aug 5 at 5:52
$begingroup$
@SemidiurnalSimon youtube.com/watch?v=m1tvMuXYtwI "Roger is that tower shaking or what ?"
$endgroup$
– gansub
Aug 5 at 5:52
7
7
$begingroup$
Is the plane "well above ground level" or "low enough to see the faces of people relatively easily"? The first suggests at least several hundred feet; the latter, at most a few tens of feet. Which is it?
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Aug 5 at 13:57
$begingroup$
Is the plane "well above ground level" or "low enough to see the faces of people relatively easily"? The first suggests at least several hundred feet; the latter, at most a few tens of feet. Which is it?
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Aug 5 at 13:57
3
3
$begingroup$
You can't easily see the faces of people from a low-flying airplane. Of the GA Cessna 172/Piper Cherokee type, anyway. (Maybe from an ultralight or purpose-designed bush plane that can fly really slowly.) Then you'd have the problem of distinguishing ground motion from your motion...
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Aug 5 at 17:19
$begingroup$
You can't easily see the faces of people from a low-flying airplane. Of the GA Cessna 172/Piper Cherokee type, anyway. (Maybe from an ultralight or purpose-designed bush plane that can fly really slowly.) Then you'd have the problem of distinguishing ground motion from your motion...
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Aug 5 at 17:19
$begingroup$
You might be able to see ground motion like this: youtube.com/watch?v=7lPbCvwbhOg
$endgroup$
– Keith McClary
Aug 6 at 2:22
$begingroup$
You might be able to see ground motion like this: youtube.com/watch?v=7lPbCvwbhOg
$endgroup$
– Keith McClary
Aug 6 at 2:22
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It depends largely on how deep, or shallow, the earthquake is, how large, and what kind of terrain you're looking down on. Some fairly large earthquakes, magnitude 6-7, can have very little surface effect, when they are centred 5+km down as many earthquakes in New Zealand often are. The finer the sediment on the surface, and the thicker the sediment cover, the greater the ground shaking is at the surface and the more motion is usually visible. Different ground covers will also make shaking more or less visible, long grass, or cereal crops, on a windy day will look like they're in motion even without a 'quake.
Shallow earthquakes often result in apparent L-wave activity, by which I mean that you can actually watch the ground wave coming towards you if you're outside on relatively flat ground, even during relatively small 3-4 pointer 'quakes. These waves also make parked vehicles rock from side to side, I would expect these effects to be the most visible from the air in the case of small to moderate earthquakes.
Larger 'quakes will cause noticeable shaking of buildings, power poles, aerials etc... even when quite deep and possibly distortion to large linear features such as roads, railways, waterways, and crop and orchard rows. These distortions would be visible as they form, and, when large enough, from very high in the air.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can see dust clouds rising from the ground after significant earthquakes.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Whether you would see the ground shake or not depends on the magnitude of the earthquake. If you are talking about the kind of quakes we have in Britain, then no, you wouldn't see anything. Even on the ground you wouldn't see anything, though you might feel the vibrations (I have felt them myself). On the other hand, if you mean the sort of magnitude 7 or 8 earthquakes sometimes experienced in places along the San Andreas fault in California, in Iran, Japan, Indonesia and other parts of the world, you most certainly would see the quake happening from a low flying plane. Sometimes these huge quakes open up great cracks in the earth, stretching for hundreds of metres, roads are severed in a fraction of a second, with the two ends severely misaligned, bridges collapse, the tops of tall buildings sway, and so on.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "553"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fearthscience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f17660%2fwould-the-shaking-of-an-earthquake-be-visible-to-somebody-in-a-low-flying-aircra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It depends largely on how deep, or shallow, the earthquake is, how large, and what kind of terrain you're looking down on. Some fairly large earthquakes, magnitude 6-7, can have very little surface effect, when they are centred 5+km down as many earthquakes in New Zealand often are. The finer the sediment on the surface, and the thicker the sediment cover, the greater the ground shaking is at the surface and the more motion is usually visible. Different ground covers will also make shaking more or less visible, long grass, or cereal crops, on a windy day will look like they're in motion even without a 'quake.
Shallow earthquakes often result in apparent L-wave activity, by which I mean that you can actually watch the ground wave coming towards you if you're outside on relatively flat ground, even during relatively small 3-4 pointer 'quakes. These waves also make parked vehicles rock from side to side, I would expect these effects to be the most visible from the air in the case of small to moderate earthquakes.
Larger 'quakes will cause noticeable shaking of buildings, power poles, aerials etc... even when quite deep and possibly distortion to large linear features such as roads, railways, waterways, and crop and orchard rows. These distortions would be visible as they form, and, when large enough, from very high in the air.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It depends largely on how deep, or shallow, the earthquake is, how large, and what kind of terrain you're looking down on. Some fairly large earthquakes, magnitude 6-7, can have very little surface effect, when they are centred 5+km down as many earthquakes in New Zealand often are. The finer the sediment on the surface, and the thicker the sediment cover, the greater the ground shaking is at the surface and the more motion is usually visible. Different ground covers will also make shaking more or less visible, long grass, or cereal crops, on a windy day will look like they're in motion even without a 'quake.
Shallow earthquakes often result in apparent L-wave activity, by which I mean that you can actually watch the ground wave coming towards you if you're outside on relatively flat ground, even during relatively small 3-4 pointer 'quakes. These waves also make parked vehicles rock from side to side, I would expect these effects to be the most visible from the air in the case of small to moderate earthquakes.
Larger 'quakes will cause noticeable shaking of buildings, power poles, aerials etc... even when quite deep and possibly distortion to large linear features such as roads, railways, waterways, and crop and orchard rows. These distortions would be visible as they form, and, when large enough, from very high in the air.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It depends largely on how deep, or shallow, the earthquake is, how large, and what kind of terrain you're looking down on. Some fairly large earthquakes, magnitude 6-7, can have very little surface effect, when they are centred 5+km down as many earthquakes in New Zealand often are. The finer the sediment on the surface, and the thicker the sediment cover, the greater the ground shaking is at the surface and the more motion is usually visible. Different ground covers will also make shaking more or less visible, long grass, or cereal crops, on a windy day will look like they're in motion even without a 'quake.
Shallow earthquakes often result in apparent L-wave activity, by which I mean that you can actually watch the ground wave coming towards you if you're outside on relatively flat ground, even during relatively small 3-4 pointer 'quakes. These waves also make parked vehicles rock from side to side, I would expect these effects to be the most visible from the air in the case of small to moderate earthquakes.
Larger 'quakes will cause noticeable shaking of buildings, power poles, aerials etc... even when quite deep and possibly distortion to large linear features such as roads, railways, waterways, and crop and orchard rows. These distortions would be visible as they form, and, when large enough, from very high in the air.
$endgroup$
It depends largely on how deep, or shallow, the earthquake is, how large, and what kind of terrain you're looking down on. Some fairly large earthquakes, magnitude 6-7, can have very little surface effect, when they are centred 5+km down as many earthquakes in New Zealand often are. The finer the sediment on the surface, and the thicker the sediment cover, the greater the ground shaking is at the surface and the more motion is usually visible. Different ground covers will also make shaking more or less visible, long grass, or cereal crops, on a windy day will look like they're in motion even without a 'quake.
Shallow earthquakes often result in apparent L-wave activity, by which I mean that you can actually watch the ground wave coming towards you if you're outside on relatively flat ground, even during relatively small 3-4 pointer 'quakes. These waves also make parked vehicles rock from side to side, I would expect these effects to be the most visible from the air in the case of small to moderate earthquakes.
Larger 'quakes will cause noticeable shaking of buildings, power poles, aerials etc... even when quite deep and possibly distortion to large linear features such as roads, railways, waterways, and crop and orchard rows. These distortions would be visible as they form, and, when large enough, from very high in the air.
answered Aug 5 at 12:20
AshAsh
2,4353 silver badges18 bronze badges
2,4353 silver badges18 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can see dust clouds rising from the ground after significant earthquakes.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can see dust clouds rising from the ground after significant earthquakes.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can see dust clouds rising from the ground after significant earthquakes.
$endgroup$
You can see dust clouds rising from the ground after significant earthquakes.
answered Aug 5 at 20:02
Bob CarrollBob Carroll
111 bronze badge
111 bronze badge
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Whether you would see the ground shake or not depends on the magnitude of the earthquake. If you are talking about the kind of quakes we have in Britain, then no, you wouldn't see anything. Even on the ground you wouldn't see anything, though you might feel the vibrations (I have felt them myself). On the other hand, if you mean the sort of magnitude 7 or 8 earthquakes sometimes experienced in places along the San Andreas fault in California, in Iran, Japan, Indonesia and other parts of the world, you most certainly would see the quake happening from a low flying plane. Sometimes these huge quakes open up great cracks in the earth, stretching for hundreds of metres, roads are severed in a fraction of a second, with the two ends severely misaligned, bridges collapse, the tops of tall buildings sway, and so on.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Whether you would see the ground shake or not depends on the magnitude of the earthquake. If you are talking about the kind of quakes we have in Britain, then no, you wouldn't see anything. Even on the ground you wouldn't see anything, though you might feel the vibrations (I have felt them myself). On the other hand, if you mean the sort of magnitude 7 or 8 earthquakes sometimes experienced in places along the San Andreas fault in California, in Iran, Japan, Indonesia and other parts of the world, you most certainly would see the quake happening from a low flying plane. Sometimes these huge quakes open up great cracks in the earth, stretching for hundreds of metres, roads are severed in a fraction of a second, with the two ends severely misaligned, bridges collapse, the tops of tall buildings sway, and so on.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Whether you would see the ground shake or not depends on the magnitude of the earthquake. If you are talking about the kind of quakes we have in Britain, then no, you wouldn't see anything. Even on the ground you wouldn't see anything, though you might feel the vibrations (I have felt them myself). On the other hand, if you mean the sort of magnitude 7 or 8 earthquakes sometimes experienced in places along the San Andreas fault in California, in Iran, Japan, Indonesia and other parts of the world, you most certainly would see the quake happening from a low flying plane. Sometimes these huge quakes open up great cracks in the earth, stretching for hundreds of metres, roads are severed in a fraction of a second, with the two ends severely misaligned, bridges collapse, the tops of tall buildings sway, and so on.
$endgroup$
Whether you would see the ground shake or not depends on the magnitude of the earthquake. If you are talking about the kind of quakes we have in Britain, then no, you wouldn't see anything. Even on the ground you wouldn't see anything, though you might feel the vibrations (I have felt them myself). On the other hand, if you mean the sort of magnitude 7 or 8 earthquakes sometimes experienced in places along the San Andreas fault in California, in Iran, Japan, Indonesia and other parts of the world, you most certainly would see the quake happening from a low flying plane. Sometimes these huge quakes open up great cracks in the earth, stretching for hundreds of metres, roads are severed in a fraction of a second, with the two ends severely misaligned, bridges collapse, the tops of tall buildings sway, and so on.
answered Aug 5 at 8:27
Michael WalsbyMichael Walsby
1,3442 silver badges6 bronze badges
1,3442 silver badges6 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Earth Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fearthscience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f17660%2fwould-the-shaking-of-an-earthquake-be-visible-to-somebody-in-a-low-flying-aircra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Hi carl sagan, welcome to the site. It's an interesting question. I've edited your title to relate to what you're asking.
$endgroup$
– Semidiurnal Simon
Aug 5 at 5:37
1
$begingroup$
@SemidiurnalSimon youtube.com/watch?v=m1tvMuXYtwI "Roger is that tower shaking or what ?"
$endgroup$
– gansub
Aug 5 at 5:52
7
$begingroup$
Is the plane "well above ground level" or "low enough to see the faces of people relatively easily"? The first suggests at least several hundred feet; the latter, at most a few tens of feet. Which is it?
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Aug 5 at 13:57
3
$begingroup$
You can't easily see the faces of people from a low-flying airplane. Of the GA Cessna 172/Piper Cherokee type, anyway. (Maybe from an ultralight or purpose-designed bush plane that can fly really slowly.) Then you'd have the problem of distinguishing ground motion from your motion...
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Aug 5 at 17:19
$begingroup$
You might be able to see ground motion like this: youtube.com/watch?v=7lPbCvwbhOg
$endgroup$
– Keith McClary
Aug 6 at 2:22