Do permissive or copyleft licenses have a limited term based on US copyright law? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How could using code released under CC0 infringe on the author's patents?Can I force my work to be open sourced in the future?Cases of license applicability to previous/next versionsWho is responsible for code being in the public domain?Does the GNU GPL imply that I hold copyright?Re-assigning copyright on GPL licensed software - does the assigner still have a copy?Copyright assignments in GermanyBuying a license to public domain software (where PD is recognized)?Is there a good license for a libertarian programmer who's against intellectual property?Can CC0 works be called “Copyright free”?

Knights and Knaves question

How to mute a string and play another at the same time

Proving inequality for positive definite matrix

Providing direct feedback to a product salesperson

Marquee sign letters

Why is one lightbulb in a string illuminated?

Does Prince Arnaud cause someone holding the Princess to lose?

Can this water damage be explained by lack of gutters and grading issues?

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

Who can become a wight?

Etymology of 見舞い

How to leave only the following strings?

Can a Wizard take the Magic Initiate feat and select spells from the Wizard list?

Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem

Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?

Does traveling In The United States require a passport or can I use my green card if not a US citizen?

How to make an animal which can only breed for a certain number of generations?

Kepler's 3rd law: ratios don't fit data

How can I introduce the names of fantasy creatures to the reader?

What's the connection between Mr. Nancy and fried chicken?

Why these surprising proportionalities of integrals involving odd zeta values?

How to produce a PS1 prompt in bash or ksh93 similar to tcsh



Do permissive or copyleft licenses have a limited term based on US copyright law?



Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How could using code released under CC0 infringe on the author's patents?Can I force my work to be open sourced in the future?Cases of license applicability to previous/next versionsWho is responsible for code being in the public domain?Does the GNU GPL imply that I hold copyright?Re-assigning copyright on GPL licensed software - does the assigner still have a copy?Copyright assignments in GermanyBuying a license to public domain software (where PD is recognized)?Is there a good license for a libertarian programmer who's against intellectual property?Can CC0 works be called “Copyright free”?










3















If you write a book, the copyright for that work is protected for a long time, but the work will eventually enter the public domain under US copyright law. Does the same thing apply to pieces of software released under a permissive open source license? Would software released under a BSD, GPL, or MIT license automatically enter the public domain at some point in the future? I know that copyright law changes frequently and retroactively, I'm just curious about how the current laws would apply.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Ivanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    3















    If you write a book, the copyright for that work is protected for a long time, but the work will eventually enter the public domain under US copyright law. Does the same thing apply to pieces of software released under a permissive open source license? Would software released under a BSD, GPL, or MIT license automatically enter the public domain at some point in the future? I know that copyright law changes frequently and retroactively, I'm just curious about how the current laws would apply.










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Ivanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      3












      3








      3








      If you write a book, the copyright for that work is protected for a long time, but the work will eventually enter the public domain under US copyright law. Does the same thing apply to pieces of software released under a permissive open source license? Would software released under a BSD, GPL, or MIT license automatically enter the public domain at some point in the future? I know that copyright law changes frequently and retroactively, I'm just curious about how the current laws would apply.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Ivanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      If you write a book, the copyright for that work is protected for a long time, but the work will eventually enter the public domain under US copyright law. Does the same thing apply to pieces of software released under a permissive open source license? Would software released under a BSD, GPL, or MIT license automatically enter the public domain at some point in the future? I know that copyright law changes frequently and retroactively, I'm just curious about how the current laws would apply.







      licensing copyright law






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Ivanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Ivanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Ivanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Apr 20 at 4:22









      IvannaIvanna

      1161




      1161




      New contributor




      Ivanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Ivanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Ivanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          Theoretically, the license itself is not time-limited - once the code has been released under any of the MIT, BSD, GPL or Apache licenses, it is available under that license in perpetuity. If 200 years from now you wanted to distribute the source to version 5.0 of the Linux kernel via the GPL, you could.



          However, when the copyright expires (70 years after the death of the author or whatever), everybody gets the ability to distribute the code however they like so they would no longer be required to follow the GPL, any other open source license, or for that matter any proprietary license. Open source licenses rely on copyright law for their effectiveness just as much as proprietary licenses do, and they all cease to be effective when the copyright protection expires.






          share|improve this answer























          • Something happened with my edit. Only CC0 (maybe "unlicense" too) isn't proprietary license, all the others are. Also, you can contrast open source with closed source but not with proprietary, since they are both proprietary.

            – Smart455
            yesterday











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "619"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          Ivanna is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8206%2fdo-permissive-or-copyleft-licenses-have-a-limited-term-based-on-us-copyright-law%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6














          Theoretically, the license itself is not time-limited - once the code has been released under any of the MIT, BSD, GPL or Apache licenses, it is available under that license in perpetuity. If 200 years from now you wanted to distribute the source to version 5.0 of the Linux kernel via the GPL, you could.



          However, when the copyright expires (70 years after the death of the author or whatever), everybody gets the ability to distribute the code however they like so they would no longer be required to follow the GPL, any other open source license, or for that matter any proprietary license. Open source licenses rely on copyright law for their effectiveness just as much as proprietary licenses do, and they all cease to be effective when the copyright protection expires.






          share|improve this answer























          • Something happened with my edit. Only CC0 (maybe "unlicense" too) isn't proprietary license, all the others are. Also, you can contrast open source with closed source but not with proprietary, since they are both proprietary.

            – Smart455
            yesterday















          6














          Theoretically, the license itself is not time-limited - once the code has been released under any of the MIT, BSD, GPL or Apache licenses, it is available under that license in perpetuity. If 200 years from now you wanted to distribute the source to version 5.0 of the Linux kernel via the GPL, you could.



          However, when the copyright expires (70 years after the death of the author or whatever), everybody gets the ability to distribute the code however they like so they would no longer be required to follow the GPL, any other open source license, or for that matter any proprietary license. Open source licenses rely on copyright law for their effectiveness just as much as proprietary licenses do, and they all cease to be effective when the copyright protection expires.






          share|improve this answer























          • Something happened with my edit. Only CC0 (maybe "unlicense" too) isn't proprietary license, all the others are. Also, you can contrast open source with closed source but not with proprietary, since they are both proprietary.

            – Smart455
            yesterday













          6












          6








          6







          Theoretically, the license itself is not time-limited - once the code has been released under any of the MIT, BSD, GPL or Apache licenses, it is available under that license in perpetuity. If 200 years from now you wanted to distribute the source to version 5.0 of the Linux kernel via the GPL, you could.



          However, when the copyright expires (70 years after the death of the author or whatever), everybody gets the ability to distribute the code however they like so they would no longer be required to follow the GPL, any other open source license, or for that matter any proprietary license. Open source licenses rely on copyright law for their effectiveness just as much as proprietary licenses do, and they all cease to be effective when the copyright protection expires.






          share|improve this answer













          Theoretically, the license itself is not time-limited - once the code has been released under any of the MIT, BSD, GPL or Apache licenses, it is available under that license in perpetuity. If 200 years from now you wanted to distribute the source to version 5.0 of the Linux kernel via the GPL, you could.



          However, when the copyright expires (70 years after the death of the author or whatever), everybody gets the ability to distribute the code however they like so they would no longer be required to follow the GPL, any other open source license, or for that matter any proprietary license. Open source licenses rely on copyright law for their effectiveness just as much as proprietary licenses do, and they all cease to be effective when the copyright protection expires.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          Philip KendallPhilip Kendall

          1,946412




          1,946412












          • Something happened with my edit. Only CC0 (maybe "unlicense" too) isn't proprietary license, all the others are. Also, you can contrast open source with closed source but not with proprietary, since they are both proprietary.

            – Smart455
            yesterday

















          • Something happened with my edit. Only CC0 (maybe "unlicense" too) isn't proprietary license, all the others are. Also, you can contrast open source with closed source but not with proprietary, since they are both proprietary.

            – Smart455
            yesterday
















          Something happened with my edit. Only CC0 (maybe "unlicense" too) isn't proprietary license, all the others are. Also, you can contrast open source with closed source but not with proprietary, since they are both proprietary.

          – Smart455
          yesterday





          Something happened with my edit. Only CC0 (maybe "unlicense" too) isn't proprietary license, all the others are. Also, you can contrast open source with closed source but not with proprietary, since they are both proprietary.

          – Smart455
          yesterday










          Ivanna is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Ivanna is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Ivanna is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          Ivanna is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Open Source Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8206%2fdo-permissive-or-copyleft-licenses-have-a-limited-term-based-on-us-copyright-law%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

          Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?