Value of the binomial series $sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$Why is the sum of the numbers $1+2+3+4+dots+N$ equal to the integral $int_0^Nx+0.5$, rather than $int_0^Nx$?Sum $displaystyle sum_n=i^infty 2n choose n-i^-1$Binomial coefficient as a summation series proof?Summing the binomial pmf over $n$Prove the following equality: $ sum_i=0 ^n j n choose j = n 2^n-1 $Find $sum_m=0^n (-1)^m m^n n choose m$Formula for $sum_k=1^n frac1k(k+1)(k+2)$?How to prove double factorial sum: $pifrac(-1)^n+12^2n-3sum_k=0^n-1(-1)^k2nchoose k(n-k)=frac(2n-3)!!(2n-2)!!fracpi2$?Evaluating the sum $sum_n = 0^n = infty a^n cos(ntheta)$Combinatorial interpretation of $sum_k=0^min(p,q)pchoose kqchoose kn+kchoose p+q=nchoose pnchoose q$

Creating Fictional Slavic Place Names

The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general public

How should I push back against my job assigning "homework"?

Why use water tanks from a retired Space Shuttle?

How does increase in volume change the speed of reaction in production of NO2?

Can you use a concentration spell while using Mantle of Majesty?

Beginner's snake game using PyGame

What does it mean by "d-ism of Leibniz" and "dotage of Newton" in simple English?

Singlequote and backslash

Select row of data if next row contains zero

Is a hash a zero-knowledge proof?

Joist hangers to use for rough cut 2x8 (2 3/4" x 8 3/4")?

Self-Preservation: How to DM NPCs that Love Living?

Can a rogue effectively triple their speed by combining Dash and Ready?

How to detach yourself from a character you're going to kill?

Why is Colorado so different politically from nearby states?

Pros and cons of writing a book review?

Is the capacitor drawn or wired wrongly?

When was the word "ambigu" first used with the sense of "meal with all items served at the same time"?

What if you don't bring your credit card or debit for incidentals?

Why does the UK have more political parties than the US?

How can I stop my presentation being derailed by audience questions?

If a problem only occurs randomly once in every N times on average, how many tests do I have to perform to be certain that it's now fixed?

Is it possible to kill all life on Earth?



Value of the binomial series $sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$


Why is the sum of the numbers $1+2+3+4+dots+N$ equal to the integral $int_0^Nx+0.5$, rather than $int_0^Nx$?Sum $displaystyle sum_n=i^infty 2n choose n-i^-1$Binomial coefficient as a summation series proof?Summing the binomial pmf over $n$Prove the following equality: $ sum_i=0 ^n j n choose j = n 2^n-1 $Find $sum_m=0^n (-1)^m m^n n choose m$Formula for $sum_k=1^n frac1k(k+1)(k+2)$?How to prove double factorial sum: $pifrac(-1)^n+12^2n-3sum_k=0^n-1(-1)^k2nchoose k(n-k)=frac(2n-3)!!(2n-2)!!fracpi2$?Evaluating the sum $sum_n = 0^n = infty a^n cos(ntheta)$Combinatorial interpretation of $sum_k=0^min(p,q)pchoose kqchoose kn+kchoose p+q=nchoose pnchoose q$













6












$begingroup$


Some time ago a question was asked here regarding the value of the sum $$sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$$.
But it was deleted later by the OP. I went around it but didn't find a solution.
Some common combinatoric identities I know of are $4^i=2^2i=sum_j=0^2i 2ichoose j$ also that $2i choose i=sum_j=0^i ichoose j^2$. But they were hardly of any use. I also thought of individual term as probability but turns out I can't think of it as anything sensible.a quick WA check gave the answer as $$k+frac12 choose k=frac(2k+1)!k!^24^k$$
Help would be appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    6












    $begingroup$


    Some time ago a question was asked here regarding the value of the sum $$sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$$.
    But it was deleted later by the OP. I went around it but didn't find a solution.
    Some common combinatoric identities I know of are $4^i=2^2i=sum_j=0^2i 2ichoose j$ also that $2i choose i=sum_j=0^i ichoose j^2$. But they were hardly of any use. I also thought of individual term as probability but turns out I can't think of it as anything sensible.a quick WA check gave the answer as $$k+frac12 choose k=frac(2k+1)!k!^24^k$$
    Help would be appreciated!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      6












      6








      6


      2



      $begingroup$


      Some time ago a question was asked here regarding the value of the sum $$sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$$.
      But it was deleted later by the OP. I went around it but didn't find a solution.
      Some common combinatoric identities I know of are $4^i=2^2i=sum_j=0^2i 2ichoose j$ also that $2i choose i=sum_j=0^i ichoose j^2$. But they were hardly of any use. I also thought of individual term as probability but turns out I can't think of it as anything sensible.a quick WA check gave the answer as $$k+frac12 choose k=frac(2k+1)!k!^24^k$$
      Help would be appreciated!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Some time ago a question was asked here regarding the value of the sum $$sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$$.
      But it was deleted later by the OP. I went around it but didn't find a solution.
      Some common combinatoric identities I know of are $4^i=2^2i=sum_j=0^2i 2ichoose j$ also that $2i choose i=sum_j=0^i ichoose j^2$. But they were hardly of any use. I also thought of individual term as probability but turns out I can't think of it as anything sensible.a quick WA check gave the answer as $$k+frac12 choose k=frac(2k+1)!k!^24^k$$
      Help would be appreciated!







      summation binomial-coefficients






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited May 24 at 6:16









      YuiTo Cheng

      3,32271445




      3,32271445










      asked May 23 at 17:10









      Archis WelankarArchis Welankar

      12.4k41742




      12.4k41742




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10












          $begingroup$

          We use the coefficient of operator $[z^n]$ to denote the coefficient of $z^n$ of a series. Recalling the generating function of the central binomial coefficients we can write
          beginalign*
          [z^i]frac1sqrt1-4z=binom2iitag1
          endalign*




          We obtain
          beginalign*
          colorbluesum_i=0^kcolorbluebinom2iifrac14^i
          &=sum_i=0^k[z^i]frac1sqrt1-ztag2\
          &=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zsum_i=0^kz^-itag3\
          &=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zcdotfracleft(frac1zright)^k+1-1frac1z-1tag4\
          &=[z^k]frac1-z^k+1(1-z)^3/2tag5\
          &=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinom-frac32j(-z)^jtag6\
          &=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinomj+frac12jz^jtag7\
          &,,colorblue=binomk+frac12k
          endalign*



          and the claim follows.




          Comment:



          • In (2) we apply the coefficient of operator according to (1).


          • In (3) we use the rule $[z^p-q]A(z)=[z^p]z^qA(z)$.


          • In (4) we apply the finite geometric series formula.


          • In (5) we do some simplifications and apply the rule from (3) again.


          • In (6) we observe $z^k+1$ in the numerator does not contribute to $[z^k]$ and we make a binomial series expansion.


          • In (7) we use the binomial identity $binom-pq=binomp+q-1q(-1)^q$.


          • In (8) we finally select the coefficient of $z^k$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – G Cab
            May 23 at 21:42










          • $begingroup$
            @GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
            $endgroup$
            – Markus Scheuer
            May 23 at 22:04


















          6












          $begingroup$

          In another way, using the duplication formula for Gamma
          $$
          Gamma left( 2,z right) = 2^,2,z - 1 over sqrt pi Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right)
          = 2^,2,z - 1 Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)
          $$

          we have
          $$
          1 over 4^,i binom2ii
          = 1 over 4^,i Gamma left( 2left( i + 1/2 right) right) over Gamma left( i + 1 right)^,2
          = Gamma left( i + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)Gamma left( i + 1 right) = binomi-1/2i
          $$



          Then our sum is
          $$
          eqalign
          & sumlimits_i = 0^k 1 over 4^,i left( matrix
          2i cr
          i cr right) = cr
          & = sumlimits_i = 0^k left( matrix
          i - 1/2 cr
          i cr right) = quad quad (1) cr
          & = sumlimits_i left( matrix
          k - i cr
          k - i cr right)left( matrix
          i - 1/2 cr
          i cr right) = quad quad (2) cr
          & = left( matrix
          k + 1/2 cr
          k cr right)quad quad (3) cr
          $$

          where:

          1) for the identity above;

          2) replacing the sum upper bound with the first b., the lower bound is implicit in the second b.;

          3) using the "double convolution" formula for binomials.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Very nice approach. (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Markus Scheuer
            May 23 at 22:05


















          4












          $begingroup$

          We prove that $$sum_k=0^n frac2k choose k4^k = frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n.$$
          We proceed by induction. The base case is easily verifiable. Denote the RHS of the above equation as $a_n$.
          Now consider $$a_n+1 = frac(2n+3)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac(2n+2)(2n+3)4(n+1)^2 cdot frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n = frac(2n+3)2n+2 a_n.$$
          So we now have $$a_n+1 - a_n =fraca_n2n+2 = frac(2n+1)!2(n+1)cdot n!^24^n = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot 2\ = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot frac2n+2n+1 = frac(2n+2)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac2(n+1) choose n+14^n+1,$$
          which is the added term in the summation. This completes the induction.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor



          auscrypt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
            $endgroup$
            – Archis Welankar
            May 23 at 18:50










          • $begingroup$
            @ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
            $endgroup$
            – auscrypt
            May 23 at 18:52











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3237320%2fvalue-of-the-binomial-series-sum-i-0k-frac2i-choose-i4i%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          10












          $begingroup$

          We use the coefficient of operator $[z^n]$ to denote the coefficient of $z^n$ of a series. Recalling the generating function of the central binomial coefficients we can write
          beginalign*
          [z^i]frac1sqrt1-4z=binom2iitag1
          endalign*




          We obtain
          beginalign*
          colorbluesum_i=0^kcolorbluebinom2iifrac14^i
          &=sum_i=0^k[z^i]frac1sqrt1-ztag2\
          &=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zsum_i=0^kz^-itag3\
          &=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zcdotfracleft(frac1zright)^k+1-1frac1z-1tag4\
          &=[z^k]frac1-z^k+1(1-z)^3/2tag5\
          &=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinom-frac32j(-z)^jtag6\
          &=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinomj+frac12jz^jtag7\
          &,,colorblue=binomk+frac12k
          endalign*



          and the claim follows.




          Comment:



          • In (2) we apply the coefficient of operator according to (1).


          • In (3) we use the rule $[z^p-q]A(z)=[z^p]z^qA(z)$.


          • In (4) we apply the finite geometric series formula.


          • In (5) we do some simplifications and apply the rule from (3) again.


          • In (6) we observe $z^k+1$ in the numerator does not contribute to $[z^k]$ and we make a binomial series expansion.


          • In (7) we use the binomial identity $binom-pq=binomp+q-1q(-1)^q$.


          • In (8) we finally select the coefficient of $z^k$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – G Cab
            May 23 at 21:42










          • $begingroup$
            @GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
            $endgroup$
            – Markus Scheuer
            May 23 at 22:04















          10












          $begingroup$

          We use the coefficient of operator $[z^n]$ to denote the coefficient of $z^n$ of a series. Recalling the generating function of the central binomial coefficients we can write
          beginalign*
          [z^i]frac1sqrt1-4z=binom2iitag1
          endalign*




          We obtain
          beginalign*
          colorbluesum_i=0^kcolorbluebinom2iifrac14^i
          &=sum_i=0^k[z^i]frac1sqrt1-ztag2\
          &=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zsum_i=0^kz^-itag3\
          &=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zcdotfracleft(frac1zright)^k+1-1frac1z-1tag4\
          &=[z^k]frac1-z^k+1(1-z)^3/2tag5\
          &=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinom-frac32j(-z)^jtag6\
          &=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinomj+frac12jz^jtag7\
          &,,colorblue=binomk+frac12k
          endalign*



          and the claim follows.




          Comment:



          • In (2) we apply the coefficient of operator according to (1).


          • In (3) we use the rule $[z^p-q]A(z)=[z^p]z^qA(z)$.


          • In (4) we apply the finite geometric series formula.


          • In (5) we do some simplifications and apply the rule from (3) again.


          • In (6) we observe $z^k+1$ in the numerator does not contribute to $[z^k]$ and we make a binomial series expansion.


          • In (7) we use the binomial identity $binom-pq=binomp+q-1q(-1)^q$.


          • In (8) we finally select the coefficient of $z^k$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – G Cab
            May 23 at 21:42










          • $begingroup$
            @GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
            $endgroup$
            – Markus Scheuer
            May 23 at 22:04













          10












          10








          10





          $begingroup$

          We use the coefficient of operator $[z^n]$ to denote the coefficient of $z^n$ of a series. Recalling the generating function of the central binomial coefficients we can write
          beginalign*
          [z^i]frac1sqrt1-4z=binom2iitag1
          endalign*




          We obtain
          beginalign*
          colorbluesum_i=0^kcolorbluebinom2iifrac14^i
          &=sum_i=0^k[z^i]frac1sqrt1-ztag2\
          &=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zsum_i=0^kz^-itag3\
          &=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zcdotfracleft(frac1zright)^k+1-1frac1z-1tag4\
          &=[z^k]frac1-z^k+1(1-z)^3/2tag5\
          &=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinom-frac32j(-z)^jtag6\
          &=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinomj+frac12jz^jtag7\
          &,,colorblue=binomk+frac12k
          endalign*



          and the claim follows.




          Comment:



          • In (2) we apply the coefficient of operator according to (1).


          • In (3) we use the rule $[z^p-q]A(z)=[z^p]z^qA(z)$.


          • In (4) we apply the finite geometric series formula.


          • In (5) we do some simplifications and apply the rule from (3) again.


          • In (6) we observe $z^k+1$ in the numerator does not contribute to $[z^k]$ and we make a binomial series expansion.


          • In (7) we use the binomial identity $binom-pq=binomp+q-1q(-1)^q$.


          • In (8) we finally select the coefficient of $z^k$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          We use the coefficient of operator $[z^n]$ to denote the coefficient of $z^n$ of a series. Recalling the generating function of the central binomial coefficients we can write
          beginalign*
          [z^i]frac1sqrt1-4z=binom2iitag1
          endalign*




          We obtain
          beginalign*
          colorbluesum_i=0^kcolorbluebinom2iifrac14^i
          &=sum_i=0^k[z^i]frac1sqrt1-ztag2\
          &=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zsum_i=0^kz^-itag3\
          &=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zcdotfracleft(frac1zright)^k+1-1frac1z-1tag4\
          &=[z^k]frac1-z^k+1(1-z)^3/2tag5\
          &=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinom-frac32j(-z)^jtag6\
          &=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinomj+frac12jz^jtag7\
          &,,colorblue=binomk+frac12k
          endalign*



          and the claim follows.




          Comment:



          • In (2) we apply the coefficient of operator according to (1).


          • In (3) we use the rule $[z^p-q]A(z)=[z^p]z^qA(z)$.


          • In (4) we apply the finite geometric series formula.


          • In (5) we do some simplifications and apply the rule from (3) again.


          • In (6) we observe $z^k+1$ in the numerator does not contribute to $[z^k]$ and we make a binomial series expansion.


          • In (7) we use the binomial identity $binom-pq=binomp+q-1q(-1)^q$.


          • In (8) we finally select the coefficient of $z^k$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited May 23 at 20:43

























          answered May 23 at 20:26









          Markus ScheuerMarkus Scheuer

          65.8k461158




          65.8k461158











          • $begingroup$
            the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – G Cab
            May 23 at 21:42










          • $begingroup$
            @GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
            $endgroup$
            – Markus Scheuer
            May 23 at 22:04
















          • $begingroup$
            the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – G Cab
            May 23 at 21:42










          • $begingroup$
            @GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
            $endgroup$
            – Markus Scheuer
            May 23 at 22:04















          $begingroup$
          the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
          $endgroup$
          – G Cab
          May 23 at 21:42




          $begingroup$
          the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
          $endgroup$
          – G Cab
          May 23 at 21:42












          $begingroup$
          @GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
          $endgroup$
          – Markus Scheuer
          May 23 at 22:04




          $begingroup$
          @GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
          $endgroup$
          – Markus Scheuer
          May 23 at 22:04











          6












          $begingroup$

          In another way, using the duplication formula for Gamma
          $$
          Gamma left( 2,z right) = 2^,2,z - 1 over sqrt pi Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right)
          = 2^,2,z - 1 Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)
          $$

          we have
          $$
          1 over 4^,i binom2ii
          = 1 over 4^,i Gamma left( 2left( i + 1/2 right) right) over Gamma left( i + 1 right)^,2
          = Gamma left( i + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)Gamma left( i + 1 right) = binomi-1/2i
          $$



          Then our sum is
          $$
          eqalign
          & sumlimits_i = 0^k 1 over 4^,i left( matrix
          2i cr
          i cr right) = cr
          & = sumlimits_i = 0^k left( matrix
          i - 1/2 cr
          i cr right) = quad quad (1) cr
          & = sumlimits_i left( matrix
          k - i cr
          k - i cr right)left( matrix
          i - 1/2 cr
          i cr right) = quad quad (2) cr
          & = left( matrix
          k + 1/2 cr
          k cr right)quad quad (3) cr
          $$

          where:

          1) for the identity above;

          2) replacing the sum upper bound with the first b., the lower bound is implicit in the second b.;

          3) using the "double convolution" formula for binomials.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Very nice approach. (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Markus Scheuer
            May 23 at 22:05















          6












          $begingroup$

          In another way, using the duplication formula for Gamma
          $$
          Gamma left( 2,z right) = 2^,2,z - 1 over sqrt pi Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right)
          = 2^,2,z - 1 Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)
          $$

          we have
          $$
          1 over 4^,i binom2ii
          = 1 over 4^,i Gamma left( 2left( i + 1/2 right) right) over Gamma left( i + 1 right)^,2
          = Gamma left( i + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)Gamma left( i + 1 right) = binomi-1/2i
          $$



          Then our sum is
          $$
          eqalign
          & sumlimits_i = 0^k 1 over 4^,i left( matrix
          2i cr
          i cr right) = cr
          & = sumlimits_i = 0^k left( matrix
          i - 1/2 cr
          i cr right) = quad quad (1) cr
          & = sumlimits_i left( matrix
          k - i cr
          k - i cr right)left( matrix
          i - 1/2 cr
          i cr right) = quad quad (2) cr
          & = left( matrix
          k + 1/2 cr
          k cr right)quad quad (3) cr
          $$

          where:

          1) for the identity above;

          2) replacing the sum upper bound with the first b., the lower bound is implicit in the second b.;

          3) using the "double convolution" formula for binomials.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Very nice approach. (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Markus Scheuer
            May 23 at 22:05













          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          In another way, using the duplication formula for Gamma
          $$
          Gamma left( 2,z right) = 2^,2,z - 1 over sqrt pi Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right)
          = 2^,2,z - 1 Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)
          $$

          we have
          $$
          1 over 4^,i binom2ii
          = 1 over 4^,i Gamma left( 2left( i + 1/2 right) right) over Gamma left( i + 1 right)^,2
          = Gamma left( i + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)Gamma left( i + 1 right) = binomi-1/2i
          $$



          Then our sum is
          $$
          eqalign
          & sumlimits_i = 0^k 1 over 4^,i left( matrix
          2i cr
          i cr right) = cr
          & = sumlimits_i = 0^k left( matrix
          i - 1/2 cr
          i cr right) = quad quad (1) cr
          & = sumlimits_i left( matrix
          k - i cr
          k - i cr right)left( matrix
          i - 1/2 cr
          i cr right) = quad quad (2) cr
          & = left( matrix
          k + 1/2 cr
          k cr right)quad quad (3) cr
          $$

          where:

          1) for the identity above;

          2) replacing the sum upper bound with the first b., the lower bound is implicit in the second b.;

          3) using the "double convolution" formula for binomials.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          In another way, using the duplication formula for Gamma
          $$
          Gamma left( 2,z right) = 2^,2,z - 1 over sqrt pi Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right)
          = 2^,2,z - 1 Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)
          $$

          we have
          $$
          1 over 4^,i binom2ii
          = 1 over 4^,i Gamma left( 2left( i + 1/2 right) right) over Gamma left( i + 1 right)^,2
          = Gamma left( i + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)Gamma left( i + 1 right) = binomi-1/2i
          $$



          Then our sum is
          $$
          eqalign
          & sumlimits_i = 0^k 1 over 4^,i left( matrix
          2i cr
          i cr right) = cr
          & = sumlimits_i = 0^k left( matrix
          i - 1/2 cr
          i cr right) = quad quad (1) cr
          & = sumlimits_i left( matrix
          k - i cr
          k - i cr right)left( matrix
          i - 1/2 cr
          i cr right) = quad quad (2) cr
          & = left( matrix
          k + 1/2 cr
          k cr right)quad quad (3) cr
          $$

          where:

          1) for the identity above;

          2) replacing the sum upper bound with the first b., the lower bound is implicit in the second b.;

          3) using the "double convolution" formula for binomials.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered May 23 at 21:40









          G CabG Cab

          21.2k31342




          21.2k31342











          • $begingroup$
            Very nice approach. (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Markus Scheuer
            May 23 at 22:05
















          • $begingroup$
            Very nice approach. (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Markus Scheuer
            May 23 at 22:05















          $begingroup$
          Very nice approach. (+1)
          $endgroup$
          – Markus Scheuer
          May 23 at 22:05




          $begingroup$
          Very nice approach. (+1)
          $endgroup$
          – Markus Scheuer
          May 23 at 22:05











          4












          $begingroup$

          We prove that $$sum_k=0^n frac2k choose k4^k = frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n.$$
          We proceed by induction. The base case is easily verifiable. Denote the RHS of the above equation as $a_n$.
          Now consider $$a_n+1 = frac(2n+3)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac(2n+2)(2n+3)4(n+1)^2 cdot frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n = frac(2n+3)2n+2 a_n.$$
          So we now have $$a_n+1 - a_n =fraca_n2n+2 = frac(2n+1)!2(n+1)cdot n!^24^n = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot 2\ = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot frac2n+2n+1 = frac(2n+2)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac2(n+1) choose n+14^n+1,$$
          which is the added term in the summation. This completes the induction.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor



          auscrypt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
            $endgroup$
            – Archis Welankar
            May 23 at 18:50










          • $begingroup$
            @ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
            $endgroup$
            – auscrypt
            May 23 at 18:52















          4












          $begingroup$

          We prove that $$sum_k=0^n frac2k choose k4^k = frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n.$$
          We proceed by induction. The base case is easily verifiable. Denote the RHS of the above equation as $a_n$.
          Now consider $$a_n+1 = frac(2n+3)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac(2n+2)(2n+3)4(n+1)^2 cdot frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n = frac(2n+3)2n+2 a_n.$$
          So we now have $$a_n+1 - a_n =fraca_n2n+2 = frac(2n+1)!2(n+1)cdot n!^24^n = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot 2\ = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot frac2n+2n+1 = frac(2n+2)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac2(n+1) choose n+14^n+1,$$
          which is the added term in the summation. This completes the induction.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor



          auscrypt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
            $endgroup$
            – Archis Welankar
            May 23 at 18:50










          • $begingroup$
            @ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
            $endgroup$
            – auscrypt
            May 23 at 18:52













          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          We prove that $$sum_k=0^n frac2k choose k4^k = frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n.$$
          We proceed by induction. The base case is easily verifiable. Denote the RHS of the above equation as $a_n$.
          Now consider $$a_n+1 = frac(2n+3)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac(2n+2)(2n+3)4(n+1)^2 cdot frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n = frac(2n+3)2n+2 a_n.$$
          So we now have $$a_n+1 - a_n =fraca_n2n+2 = frac(2n+1)!2(n+1)cdot n!^24^n = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot 2\ = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot frac2n+2n+1 = frac(2n+2)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac2(n+1) choose n+14^n+1,$$
          which is the added term in the summation. This completes the induction.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor



          auscrypt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$



          We prove that $$sum_k=0^n frac2k choose k4^k = frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n.$$
          We proceed by induction. The base case is easily verifiable. Denote the RHS of the above equation as $a_n$.
          Now consider $$a_n+1 = frac(2n+3)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac(2n+2)(2n+3)4(n+1)^2 cdot frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n = frac(2n+3)2n+2 a_n.$$
          So we now have $$a_n+1 - a_n =fraca_n2n+2 = frac(2n+1)!2(n+1)cdot n!^24^n = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot 2\ = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot frac2n+2n+1 = frac(2n+2)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac2(n+1) choose n+14^n+1,$$
          which is the added term in the summation. This completes the induction.







          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor



          auscrypt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited May 23 at 20:28









          darij grinberg

          11.9k33268




          11.9k33268






          New contributor



          auscrypt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          answered May 23 at 17:44









          auscryptauscrypt

          3,436110




          3,436110




          New contributor



          auscrypt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




          New contributor




          auscrypt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
            $endgroup$
            – Archis Welankar
            May 23 at 18:50










          • $begingroup$
            @ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
            $endgroup$
            – auscrypt
            May 23 at 18:52












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
            $endgroup$
            – Archis Welankar
            May 23 at 18:50










          • $begingroup$
            @ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
            $endgroup$
            – auscrypt
            May 23 at 18:52







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          +1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
          $endgroup$
          – Archis Welankar
          May 23 at 18:50




          $begingroup$
          +1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
          $endgroup$
          – Archis Welankar
          May 23 at 18:50












          $begingroup$
          @ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
          $endgroup$
          – auscrypt
          May 23 at 18:52




          $begingroup$
          @ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
          $endgroup$
          – auscrypt
          May 23 at 18:52

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3237320%2fvalue-of-the-binomial-series-sum-i-0k-frac2i-choose-i4i%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

          Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?