Value of the binomial series $sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$Why is the sum of the numbers $1+2+3+4+dots+N$ equal to the integral $int_0^Nx+0.5$, rather than $int_0^Nx$?Sum $displaystyle sum_n=i^infty 2n choose n-i^-1$Binomial coefficient as a summation series proof?Summing the binomial pmf over $n$Prove the following equality: $ sum_i=0 ^n j n choose j = n 2^n-1 $Find $sum_m=0^n (-1)^m m^n n choose m$Formula for $sum_k=1^n frac1k(k+1)(k+2)$?How to prove double factorial sum: $pifrac(-1)^n+12^2n-3sum_k=0^n-1(-1)^k2nchoose k(n-k)=frac(2n-3)!!(2n-2)!!fracpi2$?Evaluating the sum $sum_n = 0^n = infty a^n cos(ntheta)$Combinatorial interpretation of $sum_k=0^min(p,q)pchoose kqchoose kn+kchoose p+q=nchoose pnchoose q$
Creating Fictional Slavic Place Names
The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general public
How should I push back against my job assigning "homework"?
Why use water tanks from a retired Space Shuttle?
How does increase in volume change the speed of reaction in production of NO2?
Can you use a concentration spell while using Mantle of Majesty?
Beginner's snake game using PyGame
What does it mean by "d-ism of Leibniz" and "dotage of Newton" in simple English?
Singlequote and backslash
Select row of data if next row contains zero
Is a hash a zero-knowledge proof?
Joist hangers to use for rough cut 2x8 (2 3/4" x 8 3/4")?
Self-Preservation: How to DM NPCs that Love Living?
Can a rogue effectively triple their speed by combining Dash and Ready?
How to detach yourself from a character you're going to kill?
Why is Colorado so different politically from nearby states?
Pros and cons of writing a book review?
Is the capacitor drawn or wired wrongly?
When was the word "ambigu" first used with the sense of "meal with all items served at the same time"?
What if you don't bring your credit card or debit for incidentals?
Why does the UK have more political parties than the US?
How can I stop my presentation being derailed by audience questions?
If a problem only occurs randomly once in every N times on average, how many tests do I have to perform to be certain that it's now fixed?
Is it possible to kill all life on Earth?
Value of the binomial series $sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$
Why is the sum of the numbers $1+2+3+4+dots+N$ equal to the integral $int_0^Nx+0.5$, rather than $int_0^Nx$?Sum $displaystyle sum_n=i^infty 2n choose n-i^-1$Binomial coefficient as a summation series proof?Summing the binomial pmf over $n$Prove the following equality: $ sum_i=0 ^n j n choose j = n 2^n-1 $Find $sum_m=0^n (-1)^m m^n n choose m$Formula for $sum_k=1^n frac1k(k+1)(k+2)$?How to prove double factorial sum: $pifrac(-1)^n+12^2n-3sum_k=0^n-1(-1)^k2nchoose k(n-k)=frac(2n-3)!!(2n-2)!!fracpi2$?Evaluating the sum $sum_n = 0^n = infty a^n cos(ntheta)$Combinatorial interpretation of $sum_k=0^min(p,q)pchoose kqchoose kn+kchoose p+q=nchoose pnchoose q$
$begingroup$
Some time ago a question was asked here regarding the value of the sum $$sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$$.
But it was deleted later by the OP. I went around it but didn't find a solution.
Some common combinatoric identities I know of are $4^i=2^2i=sum_j=0^2i 2ichoose j$ also that $2i choose i=sum_j=0^i ichoose j^2$. But they were hardly of any use. I also thought of individual term as probability but turns out I can't think of it as anything sensible.a quick WA check gave the answer as $$k+frac12 choose k=frac(2k+1)!k!^24^k$$
Help would be appreciated!
summation binomial-coefficients
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Some time ago a question was asked here regarding the value of the sum $$sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$$.
But it was deleted later by the OP. I went around it but didn't find a solution.
Some common combinatoric identities I know of are $4^i=2^2i=sum_j=0^2i 2ichoose j$ also that $2i choose i=sum_j=0^i ichoose j^2$. But they were hardly of any use. I also thought of individual term as probability but turns out I can't think of it as anything sensible.a quick WA check gave the answer as $$k+frac12 choose k=frac(2k+1)!k!^24^k$$
Help would be appreciated!
summation binomial-coefficients
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Some time ago a question was asked here regarding the value of the sum $$sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$$.
But it was deleted later by the OP. I went around it but didn't find a solution.
Some common combinatoric identities I know of are $4^i=2^2i=sum_j=0^2i 2ichoose j$ also that $2i choose i=sum_j=0^i ichoose j^2$. But they were hardly of any use. I also thought of individual term as probability but turns out I can't think of it as anything sensible.a quick WA check gave the answer as $$k+frac12 choose k=frac(2k+1)!k!^24^k$$
Help would be appreciated!
summation binomial-coefficients
$endgroup$
Some time ago a question was asked here regarding the value of the sum $$sum_i=0^k frac2i choose i4^i$$.
But it was deleted later by the OP. I went around it but didn't find a solution.
Some common combinatoric identities I know of are $4^i=2^2i=sum_j=0^2i 2ichoose j$ also that $2i choose i=sum_j=0^i ichoose j^2$. But they were hardly of any use. I also thought of individual term as probability but turns out I can't think of it as anything sensible.a quick WA check gave the answer as $$k+frac12 choose k=frac(2k+1)!k!^24^k$$
Help would be appreciated!
summation binomial-coefficients
summation binomial-coefficients
edited May 24 at 6:16
YuiTo Cheng
3,32271445
3,32271445
asked May 23 at 17:10
Archis WelankarArchis Welankar
12.4k41742
12.4k41742
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We use the coefficient of operator $[z^n]$ to denote the coefficient of $z^n$ of a series. Recalling the generating function of the central binomial coefficients we can write
beginalign*
[z^i]frac1sqrt1-4z=binom2iitag1
endalign*
We obtain
beginalign*
colorbluesum_i=0^kcolorbluebinom2iifrac14^i
&=sum_i=0^k[z^i]frac1sqrt1-ztag2\
&=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zsum_i=0^kz^-itag3\
&=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zcdotfracleft(frac1zright)^k+1-1frac1z-1tag4\
&=[z^k]frac1-z^k+1(1-z)^3/2tag5\
&=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinom-frac32j(-z)^jtag6\
&=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinomj+frac12jz^jtag7\
&,,colorblue=binomk+frac12k
endalign*
and the claim follows.
Comment:
In (2) we apply the coefficient of operator according to (1).
In (3) we use the rule $[z^p-q]A(z)=[z^p]z^qA(z)$.
In (4) we apply the finite geometric series formula.
In (5) we do some simplifications and apply the rule from (3) again.
In (6) we observe $z^k+1$ in the numerator does not contribute to $[z^k]$ and we make a binomial series expansion.
In (7) we use the binomial identity $binom-pq=binomp+q-1q(-1)^q$.
In (8) we finally select the coefficient of $z^k$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
May 23 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In another way, using the duplication formula for Gamma
$$
Gamma left( 2,z right) = 2^,2,z - 1 over sqrt pi Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right)
= 2^,2,z - 1 Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)
$$
we have
$$
1 over 4^,i binom2ii
= 1 over 4^,i Gamma left( 2left( i + 1/2 right) right) over Gamma left( i + 1 right)^,2
= Gamma left( i + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)Gamma left( i + 1 right) = binomi-1/2i
$$
Then our sum is
$$
eqalign
& sumlimits_i = 0^k 1 over 4^,i left( matrix
2i cr
i cr right) = cr
& = sumlimits_i = 0^k left( matrix
i - 1/2 cr
i cr right) = quad quad (1) cr
& = sumlimits_i left( matrix
k - i cr
k - i cr right)left( matrix
i - 1/2 cr
i cr right) = quad quad (2) cr
& = left( matrix
k + 1/2 cr
k cr right)quad quad (3) cr
$$
where:
1) for the identity above;
2) replacing the sum upper bound with the first b., the lower bound is implicit in the second b.;
3) using the "double convolution" formula for binomials.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice approach. (+1)
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We prove that $$sum_k=0^n frac2k choose k4^k = frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n.$$
We proceed by induction. The base case is easily verifiable. Denote the RHS of the above equation as $a_n$.
Now consider $$a_n+1 = frac(2n+3)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac(2n+2)(2n+3)4(n+1)^2 cdot frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n = frac(2n+3)2n+2 a_n.$$
So we now have $$a_n+1 - a_n =fraca_n2n+2 = frac(2n+1)!2(n+1)cdot n!^24^n = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot 2\ = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot frac2n+2n+1 = frac(2n+2)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac2(n+1) choose n+14^n+1,$$
which is the added term in the summation. This completes the induction.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
+1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
$endgroup$
– Archis Welankar
May 23 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
$endgroup$
– auscrypt
May 23 at 18:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3237320%2fvalue-of-the-binomial-series-sum-i-0k-frac2i-choose-i4i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We use the coefficient of operator $[z^n]$ to denote the coefficient of $z^n$ of a series. Recalling the generating function of the central binomial coefficients we can write
beginalign*
[z^i]frac1sqrt1-4z=binom2iitag1
endalign*
We obtain
beginalign*
colorbluesum_i=0^kcolorbluebinom2iifrac14^i
&=sum_i=0^k[z^i]frac1sqrt1-ztag2\
&=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zsum_i=0^kz^-itag3\
&=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zcdotfracleft(frac1zright)^k+1-1frac1z-1tag4\
&=[z^k]frac1-z^k+1(1-z)^3/2tag5\
&=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinom-frac32j(-z)^jtag6\
&=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinomj+frac12jz^jtag7\
&,,colorblue=binomk+frac12k
endalign*
and the claim follows.
Comment:
In (2) we apply the coefficient of operator according to (1).
In (3) we use the rule $[z^p-q]A(z)=[z^p]z^qA(z)$.
In (4) we apply the finite geometric series formula.
In (5) we do some simplifications and apply the rule from (3) again.
In (6) we observe $z^k+1$ in the numerator does not contribute to $[z^k]$ and we make a binomial series expansion.
In (7) we use the binomial identity $binom-pq=binomp+q-1q(-1)^q$.
In (8) we finally select the coefficient of $z^k$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
May 23 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We use the coefficient of operator $[z^n]$ to denote the coefficient of $z^n$ of a series. Recalling the generating function of the central binomial coefficients we can write
beginalign*
[z^i]frac1sqrt1-4z=binom2iitag1
endalign*
We obtain
beginalign*
colorbluesum_i=0^kcolorbluebinom2iifrac14^i
&=sum_i=0^k[z^i]frac1sqrt1-ztag2\
&=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zsum_i=0^kz^-itag3\
&=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zcdotfracleft(frac1zright)^k+1-1frac1z-1tag4\
&=[z^k]frac1-z^k+1(1-z)^3/2tag5\
&=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinom-frac32j(-z)^jtag6\
&=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinomj+frac12jz^jtag7\
&,,colorblue=binomk+frac12k
endalign*
and the claim follows.
Comment:
In (2) we apply the coefficient of operator according to (1).
In (3) we use the rule $[z^p-q]A(z)=[z^p]z^qA(z)$.
In (4) we apply the finite geometric series formula.
In (5) we do some simplifications and apply the rule from (3) again.
In (6) we observe $z^k+1$ in the numerator does not contribute to $[z^k]$ and we make a binomial series expansion.
In (7) we use the binomial identity $binom-pq=binomp+q-1q(-1)^q$.
In (8) we finally select the coefficient of $z^k$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
May 23 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We use the coefficient of operator $[z^n]$ to denote the coefficient of $z^n$ of a series. Recalling the generating function of the central binomial coefficients we can write
beginalign*
[z^i]frac1sqrt1-4z=binom2iitag1
endalign*
We obtain
beginalign*
colorbluesum_i=0^kcolorbluebinom2iifrac14^i
&=sum_i=0^k[z^i]frac1sqrt1-ztag2\
&=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zsum_i=0^kz^-itag3\
&=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zcdotfracleft(frac1zright)^k+1-1frac1z-1tag4\
&=[z^k]frac1-z^k+1(1-z)^3/2tag5\
&=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinom-frac32j(-z)^jtag6\
&=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinomj+frac12jz^jtag7\
&,,colorblue=binomk+frac12k
endalign*
and the claim follows.
Comment:
In (2) we apply the coefficient of operator according to (1).
In (3) we use the rule $[z^p-q]A(z)=[z^p]z^qA(z)$.
In (4) we apply the finite geometric series formula.
In (5) we do some simplifications and apply the rule from (3) again.
In (6) we observe $z^k+1$ in the numerator does not contribute to $[z^k]$ and we make a binomial series expansion.
In (7) we use the binomial identity $binom-pq=binomp+q-1q(-1)^q$.
In (8) we finally select the coefficient of $z^k$.
$endgroup$
We use the coefficient of operator $[z^n]$ to denote the coefficient of $z^n$ of a series. Recalling the generating function of the central binomial coefficients we can write
beginalign*
[z^i]frac1sqrt1-4z=binom2iitag1
endalign*
We obtain
beginalign*
colorbluesum_i=0^kcolorbluebinom2iifrac14^i
&=sum_i=0^k[z^i]frac1sqrt1-ztag2\
&=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zsum_i=0^kz^-itag3\
&=[z^0]frac1sqrt1-zcdotfracleft(frac1zright)^k+1-1frac1z-1tag4\
&=[z^k]frac1-z^k+1(1-z)^3/2tag5\
&=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinom-frac32j(-z)^jtag6\
&=[z^k]sum_j=0^inftybinomj+frac12jz^jtag7\
&,,colorblue=binomk+frac12k
endalign*
and the claim follows.
Comment:
In (2) we apply the coefficient of operator according to (1).
In (3) we use the rule $[z^p-q]A(z)=[z^p]z^qA(z)$.
In (4) we apply the finite geometric series formula.
In (5) we do some simplifications and apply the rule from (3) again.
In (6) we observe $z^k+1$ in the numerator does not contribute to $[z^k]$ and we make a binomial series expansion.
In (7) we use the binomial identity $binom-pq=binomp+q-1q(-1)^q$.
In (8) we finally select the coefficient of $z^k$.
edited May 23 at 20:43
answered May 23 at 20:26
Markus ScheuerMarkus Scheuer
65.8k461158
65.8k461158
$begingroup$
the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
May 23 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
May 23 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:04
$begingroup$
the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
May 23 at 21:42
$begingroup$
the "coefficient of" method is always effective ! (+1)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
May 23 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:04
$begingroup$
@GCab: At least often useful. :-) Thanks for the credit.
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In another way, using the duplication formula for Gamma
$$
Gamma left( 2,z right) = 2^,2,z - 1 over sqrt pi Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right)
= 2^,2,z - 1 Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)
$$
we have
$$
1 over 4^,i binom2ii
= 1 over 4^,i Gamma left( 2left( i + 1/2 right) right) over Gamma left( i + 1 right)^,2
= Gamma left( i + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)Gamma left( i + 1 right) = binomi-1/2i
$$
Then our sum is
$$
eqalign
& sumlimits_i = 0^k 1 over 4^,i left( matrix
2i cr
i cr right) = cr
& = sumlimits_i = 0^k left( matrix
i - 1/2 cr
i cr right) = quad quad (1) cr
& = sumlimits_i left( matrix
k - i cr
k - i cr right)left( matrix
i - 1/2 cr
i cr right) = quad quad (2) cr
& = left( matrix
k + 1/2 cr
k cr right)quad quad (3) cr
$$
where:
1) for the identity above;
2) replacing the sum upper bound with the first b., the lower bound is implicit in the second b.;
3) using the "double convolution" formula for binomials.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice approach. (+1)
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In another way, using the duplication formula for Gamma
$$
Gamma left( 2,z right) = 2^,2,z - 1 over sqrt pi Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right)
= 2^,2,z - 1 Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)
$$
we have
$$
1 over 4^,i binom2ii
= 1 over 4^,i Gamma left( 2left( i + 1/2 right) right) over Gamma left( i + 1 right)^,2
= Gamma left( i + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)Gamma left( i + 1 right) = binomi-1/2i
$$
Then our sum is
$$
eqalign
& sumlimits_i = 0^k 1 over 4^,i left( matrix
2i cr
i cr right) = cr
& = sumlimits_i = 0^k left( matrix
i - 1/2 cr
i cr right) = quad quad (1) cr
& = sumlimits_i left( matrix
k - i cr
k - i cr right)left( matrix
i - 1/2 cr
i cr right) = quad quad (2) cr
& = left( matrix
k + 1/2 cr
k cr right)quad quad (3) cr
$$
where:
1) for the identity above;
2) replacing the sum upper bound with the first b., the lower bound is implicit in the second b.;
3) using the "double convolution" formula for binomials.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice approach. (+1)
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In another way, using the duplication formula for Gamma
$$
Gamma left( 2,z right) = 2^,2,z - 1 over sqrt pi Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right)
= 2^,2,z - 1 Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)
$$
we have
$$
1 over 4^,i binom2ii
= 1 over 4^,i Gamma left( 2left( i + 1/2 right) right) over Gamma left( i + 1 right)^,2
= Gamma left( i + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)Gamma left( i + 1 right) = binomi-1/2i
$$
Then our sum is
$$
eqalign
& sumlimits_i = 0^k 1 over 4^,i left( matrix
2i cr
i cr right) = cr
& = sumlimits_i = 0^k left( matrix
i - 1/2 cr
i cr right) = quad quad (1) cr
& = sumlimits_i left( matrix
k - i cr
k - i cr right)left( matrix
i - 1/2 cr
i cr right) = quad quad (2) cr
& = left( matrix
k + 1/2 cr
k cr right)quad quad (3) cr
$$
where:
1) for the identity above;
2) replacing the sum upper bound with the first b., the lower bound is implicit in the second b.;
3) using the "double convolution" formula for binomials.
$endgroup$
In another way, using the duplication formula for Gamma
$$
Gamma left( 2,z right) = 2^,2,z - 1 over sqrt pi Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right)
= 2^,2,z - 1 Gamma left( z right)Gamma left( z + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)
$$
we have
$$
1 over 4^,i binom2ii
= 1 over 4^,i Gamma left( 2left( i + 1/2 right) right) over Gamma left( i + 1 right)^,2
= Gamma left( i + 1/2 right) over Gamma left( 1/2 right)Gamma left( i + 1 right) = binomi-1/2i
$$
Then our sum is
$$
eqalign
& sumlimits_i = 0^k 1 over 4^,i left( matrix
2i cr
i cr right) = cr
& = sumlimits_i = 0^k left( matrix
i - 1/2 cr
i cr right) = quad quad (1) cr
& = sumlimits_i left( matrix
k - i cr
k - i cr right)left( matrix
i - 1/2 cr
i cr right) = quad quad (2) cr
& = left( matrix
k + 1/2 cr
k cr right)quad quad (3) cr
$$
where:
1) for the identity above;
2) replacing the sum upper bound with the first b., the lower bound is implicit in the second b.;
3) using the "double convolution" formula for binomials.
answered May 23 at 21:40
G CabG Cab
21.2k31342
21.2k31342
$begingroup$
Very nice approach. (+1)
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Very nice approach. (+1)
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:05
$begingroup$
Very nice approach. (+1)
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:05
$begingroup$
Very nice approach. (+1)
$endgroup$
– Markus Scheuer
May 23 at 22:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We prove that $$sum_k=0^n frac2k choose k4^k = frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n.$$
We proceed by induction. The base case is easily verifiable. Denote the RHS of the above equation as $a_n$.
Now consider $$a_n+1 = frac(2n+3)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac(2n+2)(2n+3)4(n+1)^2 cdot frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n = frac(2n+3)2n+2 a_n.$$
So we now have $$a_n+1 - a_n =fraca_n2n+2 = frac(2n+1)!2(n+1)cdot n!^24^n = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot 2\ = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot frac2n+2n+1 = frac(2n+2)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac2(n+1) choose n+14^n+1,$$
which is the added term in the summation. This completes the induction.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
+1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
$endgroup$
– Archis Welankar
May 23 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
$endgroup$
– auscrypt
May 23 at 18:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We prove that $$sum_k=0^n frac2k choose k4^k = frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n.$$
We proceed by induction. The base case is easily verifiable. Denote the RHS of the above equation as $a_n$.
Now consider $$a_n+1 = frac(2n+3)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac(2n+2)(2n+3)4(n+1)^2 cdot frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n = frac(2n+3)2n+2 a_n.$$
So we now have $$a_n+1 - a_n =fraca_n2n+2 = frac(2n+1)!2(n+1)cdot n!^24^n = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot 2\ = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot frac2n+2n+1 = frac(2n+2)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac2(n+1) choose n+14^n+1,$$
which is the added term in the summation. This completes the induction.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
+1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
$endgroup$
– Archis Welankar
May 23 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
$endgroup$
– auscrypt
May 23 at 18:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We prove that $$sum_k=0^n frac2k choose k4^k = frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n.$$
We proceed by induction. The base case is easily verifiable. Denote the RHS of the above equation as $a_n$.
Now consider $$a_n+1 = frac(2n+3)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac(2n+2)(2n+3)4(n+1)^2 cdot frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n = frac(2n+3)2n+2 a_n.$$
So we now have $$a_n+1 - a_n =fraca_n2n+2 = frac(2n+1)!2(n+1)cdot n!^24^n = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot 2\ = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot frac2n+2n+1 = frac(2n+2)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac2(n+1) choose n+14^n+1,$$
which is the added term in the summation. This completes the induction.
New contributor
$endgroup$
We prove that $$sum_k=0^n frac2k choose k4^k = frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n.$$
We proceed by induction. The base case is easily verifiable. Denote the RHS of the above equation as $a_n$.
Now consider $$a_n+1 = frac(2n+3)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac(2n+2)(2n+3)4(n+1)^2 cdot frac(2n+1)!n!^24^n = frac(2n+3)2n+2 a_n.$$
So we now have $$a_n+1 - a_n =fraca_n2n+2 = frac(2n+1)!2(n+1)cdot n!^24^n = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot 2\ = frac(2n+1)!(n+1)!n!4^n+1cdot frac2n+2n+1 = frac(2n+2)!(n+1)!^24^n+1 = frac2(n+1) choose n+14^n+1,$$
which is the added term in the summation. This completes the induction.
New contributor
edited May 23 at 20:28
darij grinberg
11.9k33268
11.9k33268
New contributor
answered May 23 at 17:44
auscryptauscrypt
3,436110
3,436110
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
+1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
$endgroup$
– Archis Welankar
May 23 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
$endgroup$
– auscrypt
May 23 at 18:52
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
+1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
$endgroup$
– Archis Welankar
May 23 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
$endgroup$
– auscrypt
May 23 at 18:52
1
1
$begingroup$
+1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
$endgroup$
– Archis Welankar
May 23 at 18:50
$begingroup$
+1 but the result wasn't known beforehand so I dont think induction can really help :)
$endgroup$
– Archis Welankar
May 23 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
$endgroup$
– auscrypt
May 23 at 18:52
$begingroup$
@ArchisWelankar Yeah, induction is only really useful here because the result was worked out already, either by guessing it or by using WA (or some other method).
$endgroup$
– auscrypt
May 23 at 18:52
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3237320%2fvalue-of-the-binomial-series-sum-i-0k-frac2i-choose-i4i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown