Why did the Apple IIe make a hideous noise if you inserted the disk upside down?Why won't the game “Ultima I” work on my Apple IIe system?How to connect an Apple IIe to an external Sider hard disk driveAnyone remember how to write the Apple ][ HIRES pages to disk to make screenshots?Did the Apple IIe Platinum include all feature enhancements from the Apple II line?Turn off Apple IIe soundIs there any benefit of using an Apple Language Card in an Apple IIe?Why not make more use of the video generation logic?Why did Apple remove booting from external drives in later IIc ROM versions?Why did the Apple IIc perform badly in the market?Did Apple bundle a specific monitor with the Apple II+ for schools?

How to find the version of extensions used on a Joomla website without access to the backend?

How to play a D major chord lower than the open E major chord on guitar?

How do I check that users don't write down their passwords?

Chilling juice in copper vessel

Can a USB hub be used to access a drive from two devices?

How complicated can a finite double complex over a field be?

How to get the speed of my spaceship?

What is this airplane with small wings at different angles seen at Paphos Airport?

Earliest example of double planets in science fiction?

Was the 45.9°C temperature in France in June 2019 the highest ever recorded in France?

Why does this function pointer assignment work when assigned directly but not with the conditional operator?

Taking my Ph.D. advisor out for dinner after graduation

Array or vector? Two dimensional array or matrix?

What are some bad ways to subvert tropes?

How do I talk to my wife about unrealistic expectations?

Does a Globe of Invulnerability spell block outsiders from teleporting inside with a spell?

Will Jimmy fall off his platform?

How did Einstein know the speed of light was constant?

How to reclaim personal item I've lent to the office without burning bridges?

What is the meaning of "prairie-dog" in this sentence?

Any way to meet code with 40.7% or 40.44% conduit fill?

How important is it for multiple POVs to run chronologically?

Is conquering your neighbors to fight a greater enemy a valid strategy?

What's the difference between a type and a kind?



Why did the Apple IIe make a hideous noise if you inserted the disk upside down?


Why won't the game “Ultima I” work on my Apple IIe system?How to connect an Apple IIe to an external Sider hard disk driveAnyone remember how to write the Apple ][ HIRES pages to disk to make screenshots?Did the Apple IIe Platinum include all feature enhancements from the Apple II line?Turn off Apple IIe soundIs there any benefit of using an Apple Language Card in an Apple IIe?Why not make more use of the video generation logic?Why did Apple remove booting from external drives in later IIc ROM versions?Why did the Apple IIc perform badly in the market?Did Apple bundle a specific monitor with the Apple II+ for schools?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








26















When I began high school in 1987 all the computers in the lab were Apple IIe desktop computers. A question has haunted me since then:



if you inserted a floppy disk "upside down" the Apple IIe would make a hideous noise like a vacuum cleaner. Why? What a shocking design; it scared the heck out of me as a newb. Was it usual to do that to a user? I never really recovered from that; I was put off computers for the rest of high school.



Why design a computer like that for newbs? I'd never seen a computer before. Even worse, the noise would not end. It would go on for minutes. Who on earth decided to make it like that? I'd fire the design team.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    I don't recall such a noise - and we had a special notcher-tool for adding a second notch specifically to flip the disk and use the other side for data storage. Were you putting the disks in with the read window in the wrong place, ie, sideways?

    – Criggie
    Jun 27 at 20:45






  • 1





    Floppy disks can be used either way up, you just needed to cut another notch to write to the other side. The magnetic material on the back was supposedly sometimes not as good quality as that on the front but I never had an issue with it. So this doesn't really make sense. Are you sure you're not thinking of 3.5" disks?

    – Jonathan Potter
    Jun 27 at 21:24






  • 2





    @JonathanPotter unlikely - the apple ][ could use a 3.5" disk but it was massively rare, and only arrived after the macintosh release. So for ~all users it was 5.25" floppies storing 113 kbytes or 140 kbytes/side.

    – Criggie
    Jun 27 at 23:04






  • 1





    After inserting the disk, how did you access it? If you were at a DOS prompt and then typed "CATALOG" or similar, the noise was DOS recalibrating the drive after getting repeated read errors on a presumably unformatted disk. In that case, it's not specific to being upside down or not, but readable by DOS or not.

    – peter ferrie
    Jun 28 at 17:46






  • 1





    It wasn’t that easy to put a disk in upside down... the top was smooth and had a label on it, the bottom had ridges from the fold over and sonic welding... I mean you'd really have to not be paying attention.

    – Harper
    Jun 28 at 22:49

















26















When I began high school in 1987 all the computers in the lab were Apple IIe desktop computers. A question has haunted me since then:



if you inserted a floppy disk "upside down" the Apple IIe would make a hideous noise like a vacuum cleaner. Why? What a shocking design; it scared the heck out of me as a newb. Was it usual to do that to a user? I never really recovered from that; I was put off computers for the rest of high school.



Why design a computer like that for newbs? I'd never seen a computer before. Even worse, the noise would not end. It would go on for minutes. Who on earth decided to make it like that? I'd fire the design team.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    I don't recall such a noise - and we had a special notcher-tool for adding a second notch specifically to flip the disk and use the other side for data storage. Were you putting the disks in with the read window in the wrong place, ie, sideways?

    – Criggie
    Jun 27 at 20:45






  • 1





    Floppy disks can be used either way up, you just needed to cut another notch to write to the other side. The magnetic material on the back was supposedly sometimes not as good quality as that on the front but I never had an issue with it. So this doesn't really make sense. Are you sure you're not thinking of 3.5" disks?

    – Jonathan Potter
    Jun 27 at 21:24






  • 2





    @JonathanPotter unlikely - the apple ][ could use a 3.5" disk but it was massively rare, and only arrived after the macintosh release. So for ~all users it was 5.25" floppies storing 113 kbytes or 140 kbytes/side.

    – Criggie
    Jun 27 at 23:04






  • 1





    After inserting the disk, how did you access it? If you were at a DOS prompt and then typed "CATALOG" or similar, the noise was DOS recalibrating the drive after getting repeated read errors on a presumably unformatted disk. In that case, it's not specific to being upside down or not, but readable by DOS or not.

    – peter ferrie
    Jun 28 at 17:46






  • 1





    It wasn’t that easy to put a disk in upside down... the top was smooth and had a label on it, the bottom had ridges from the fold over and sonic welding... I mean you'd really have to not be paying attention.

    – Harper
    Jun 28 at 22:49













26












26








26


1






When I began high school in 1987 all the computers in the lab were Apple IIe desktop computers. A question has haunted me since then:



if you inserted a floppy disk "upside down" the Apple IIe would make a hideous noise like a vacuum cleaner. Why? What a shocking design; it scared the heck out of me as a newb. Was it usual to do that to a user? I never really recovered from that; I was put off computers for the rest of high school.



Why design a computer like that for newbs? I'd never seen a computer before. Even worse, the noise would not end. It would go on for minutes. Who on earth decided to make it like that? I'd fire the design team.










share|improve this question
















When I began high school in 1987 all the computers in the lab were Apple IIe desktop computers. A question has haunted me since then:



if you inserted a floppy disk "upside down" the Apple IIe would make a hideous noise like a vacuum cleaner. Why? What a shocking design; it scared the heck out of me as a newb. Was it usual to do that to a user? I never really recovered from that; I was put off computers for the rest of high school.



Why design a computer like that for newbs? I'd never seen a computer before. Even worse, the noise would not end. It would go on for minutes. Who on earth decided to make it like that? I'd fire the design team.







apple-ii






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 29 at 21:26









JakeGould

1155 bronze badges




1155 bronze badges










asked Jun 26 at 22:35









Snack_Food_TermiteSnack_Food_Termite

2862 silver badges8 bronze badges




2862 silver badges8 bronze badges







  • 1





    I don't recall such a noise - and we had a special notcher-tool for adding a second notch specifically to flip the disk and use the other side for data storage. Were you putting the disks in with the read window in the wrong place, ie, sideways?

    – Criggie
    Jun 27 at 20:45






  • 1





    Floppy disks can be used either way up, you just needed to cut another notch to write to the other side. The magnetic material on the back was supposedly sometimes not as good quality as that on the front but I never had an issue with it. So this doesn't really make sense. Are you sure you're not thinking of 3.5" disks?

    – Jonathan Potter
    Jun 27 at 21:24






  • 2





    @JonathanPotter unlikely - the apple ][ could use a 3.5" disk but it was massively rare, and only arrived after the macintosh release. So for ~all users it was 5.25" floppies storing 113 kbytes or 140 kbytes/side.

    – Criggie
    Jun 27 at 23:04






  • 1





    After inserting the disk, how did you access it? If you were at a DOS prompt and then typed "CATALOG" or similar, the noise was DOS recalibrating the drive after getting repeated read errors on a presumably unformatted disk. In that case, it's not specific to being upside down or not, but readable by DOS or not.

    – peter ferrie
    Jun 28 at 17:46






  • 1





    It wasn’t that easy to put a disk in upside down... the top was smooth and had a label on it, the bottom had ridges from the fold over and sonic welding... I mean you'd really have to not be paying attention.

    – Harper
    Jun 28 at 22:49












  • 1





    I don't recall such a noise - and we had a special notcher-tool for adding a second notch specifically to flip the disk and use the other side for data storage. Were you putting the disks in with the read window in the wrong place, ie, sideways?

    – Criggie
    Jun 27 at 20:45






  • 1





    Floppy disks can be used either way up, you just needed to cut another notch to write to the other side. The magnetic material on the back was supposedly sometimes not as good quality as that on the front but I never had an issue with it. So this doesn't really make sense. Are you sure you're not thinking of 3.5" disks?

    – Jonathan Potter
    Jun 27 at 21:24






  • 2





    @JonathanPotter unlikely - the apple ][ could use a 3.5" disk but it was massively rare, and only arrived after the macintosh release. So for ~all users it was 5.25" floppies storing 113 kbytes or 140 kbytes/side.

    – Criggie
    Jun 27 at 23:04






  • 1





    After inserting the disk, how did you access it? If you were at a DOS prompt and then typed "CATALOG" or similar, the noise was DOS recalibrating the drive after getting repeated read errors on a presumably unformatted disk. In that case, it's not specific to being upside down or not, but readable by DOS or not.

    – peter ferrie
    Jun 28 at 17:46






  • 1





    It wasn’t that easy to put a disk in upside down... the top was smooth and had a label on it, the bottom had ridges from the fold over and sonic welding... I mean you'd really have to not be paying attention.

    – Harper
    Jun 28 at 22:49







1




1





I don't recall such a noise - and we had a special notcher-tool for adding a second notch specifically to flip the disk and use the other side for data storage. Were you putting the disks in with the read window in the wrong place, ie, sideways?

– Criggie
Jun 27 at 20:45





I don't recall such a noise - and we had a special notcher-tool for adding a second notch specifically to flip the disk and use the other side for data storage. Were you putting the disks in with the read window in the wrong place, ie, sideways?

– Criggie
Jun 27 at 20:45




1




1





Floppy disks can be used either way up, you just needed to cut another notch to write to the other side. The magnetic material on the back was supposedly sometimes not as good quality as that on the front but I never had an issue with it. So this doesn't really make sense. Are you sure you're not thinking of 3.5" disks?

– Jonathan Potter
Jun 27 at 21:24





Floppy disks can be used either way up, you just needed to cut another notch to write to the other side. The magnetic material on the back was supposedly sometimes not as good quality as that on the front but I never had an issue with it. So this doesn't really make sense. Are you sure you're not thinking of 3.5" disks?

– Jonathan Potter
Jun 27 at 21:24




2




2





@JonathanPotter unlikely - the apple ][ could use a 3.5" disk but it was massively rare, and only arrived after the macintosh release. So for ~all users it was 5.25" floppies storing 113 kbytes or 140 kbytes/side.

– Criggie
Jun 27 at 23:04





@JonathanPotter unlikely - the apple ][ could use a 3.5" disk but it was massively rare, and only arrived after the macintosh release. So for ~all users it was 5.25" floppies storing 113 kbytes or 140 kbytes/side.

– Criggie
Jun 27 at 23:04




1




1





After inserting the disk, how did you access it? If you were at a DOS prompt and then typed "CATALOG" or similar, the noise was DOS recalibrating the drive after getting repeated read errors on a presumably unformatted disk. In that case, it's not specific to being upside down or not, but readable by DOS or not.

– peter ferrie
Jun 28 at 17:46





After inserting the disk, how did you access it? If you were at a DOS prompt and then typed "CATALOG" or similar, the noise was DOS recalibrating the drive after getting repeated read errors on a presumably unformatted disk. In that case, it's not specific to being upside down or not, but readable by DOS or not.

– peter ferrie
Jun 28 at 17:46




1




1





It wasn’t that easy to put a disk in upside down... the top was smooth and had a label on it, the bottom had ridges from the fold over and sonic welding... I mean you'd really have to not be paying attention.

– Harper
Jun 28 at 22:49





It wasn’t that easy to put a disk in upside down... the top was smooth and had a label on it, the bottom had ridges from the fold over and sonic welding... I mean you'd really have to not be paying attention.

– Harper
Jun 28 at 22:49










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















111














While some floppy drives have a sensor to determine when the head is at the outermost position, the Apple uses four approaches:



  1. On startup, it blindly tries to move the head outward about 40 tracks. When the motor hits the end stop it will be unable to move further and will consequently stop. Once the Apple has done this, it will assume the head is at the outermost track.


  2. When formatting a disk, the Apple uses the same procedure to force the head to the outermost track.


  3. The Apple will keep track of how it has moved the head in and out since it forced it to the end stop, and will thus generally know where it expects the head to be. Because each track of a formatted disk includes markers that identify it, the Apple will generally assume that if it thinks it's on e.g. track 12, and it sees a marker for track 12, then it is in fact on track 12 and it can proceed on that basis.


  4. If the Apple is unable to see markers that indicate that it's where it thinks it should be, it will force the head to the outermost track, then step it by the proper number of steps to reach the proper position, and look again.


The noise you heard was from step 4. When trying to access a valid formatted disk, the Apple will generally not need to run the head against the end stop, but the back side of most disks won't typically be validly formatted.






share|improve this answer


















  • 6





    Note that this isn't unique to Apple. I have yet to encounter a drive that didn't behave this way, it's just more modern drives are quieter about it and the stepper motors move the heads faster so it doesn't last as long. It even applies to hard disks but you won't encounter it unless you have a dying drive.

    – Loren Pechtel
    Jun 28 at 3:25






  • 3





    @LorenPechtel: The Commodore 1571 drive has an optical sensor, as does the IBM PC; I think 3.5" drives have also had sensors from the beginning.

    – supercat
    Jun 28 at 4:35











  • Yes, this is the correct reason for the noise. I owned an Apple //e as a child (and still have it today!) and encounter this noise whenever I try to use a corrupted disk - the issue is that the drive is trying to recalibrate itself and gets really noisy while doing so.

    – TheHansinator
    Jun 28 at 16:16






  • 1





    Yes, this is the correct answer. Any un-formatted or corrupted disk will make the same sound. The back side is usable if you cut out a notch to allow writing. There was a big motivation to use the back side, the first floppies that I bought were $4 each! When I heard the noise, I was usually mad, not scared, it meant that my expensive floppy had a problem. The OP accepted the answer that he/she wanted to hear.

    – Mattman944
    Jun 29 at 8:14











  • @Mattman944 ...or never hear again

    – A C
    Jun 30 at 7:05


















13














The short answer is they did it to save money. They could have made the drive behave better when a disk is inserted upside down, but that would have required larger ROM chips to store the firmware or more expensive drives and controllers to detect the problem.



As long as it didn't damage the computer such behaviours were considered acceptable to get the price down.






share|improve this answer


















  • 17





    That's simply wrong, as the drive didn't behave different according to which side was 'up'

    – Raffzahn
    Jun 27 at 11:59






  • 4





    @Raffzahn what does that have to do with anything? I'm saying that any less-than-optimal behaviour was mostly just due to it costing more money to implement better behaviour, like detecting when the disk is in upside down or a better abort procedure so it doesn't keep grinding away for minutes on end.

    – user
    Jun 27 at 14:08






  • 5





    @Raffzahn That's the point.

    – TKK
    Jun 27 at 19:19






  • 7





    This answer is still wrong. The drive made the same noise for an unformatted disk. The backside of a disk is unformatted (unless you punch a hole to disable write protection and format it, which basically all Apple II users did to save money). The drive has no way to know if the disk is upside down or not. The drive has no way to know if the disk is unformatted or not. They couldn't have made the drive "behave better", no matter how more expensive it was. The software that made the noise was actually in RAM, and not in ROM (unless you booted, when it always would make that noise).

    – dirkt
    Jun 28 at 5:50







  • 4





    Repeat after me: There are no orientation sensors for disks. Because 5.25" floppy disks are symmetrical, there's no way to know which side is up when you put them into a drive. They could have added a sensor for track 0, which they omitted, so the way to recalibrate is to move the read-write head to lower tracks for like 80 tracks, and when it bumps into a mechanical stopper, it makes that noise.

    – dirkt
    Jun 28 at 11:02



















11














The obvious answer is that it wasn't designed 'for newbs' but as a general purpose personal computer that would find its way into many homes and businesses as well as educational establishments. Even in the latter, they also had to be suitable for running some fairly advanced software as well as for introductory courses.



By the standards of the 70s, when serious computing was generally the realm of the scientifically literate, the Apple II was pretty user friendly though. It actually had a monitor and keyboard, you didn't need to flip switches and look at lights to boot it up, and programming errors gave fairly comprehensible error messages.



It also had to be built to a budget though, so they couldn't design it to prevent every instance of user error from causing problems without the cost ballooning. Apple computers were already relatively expensive for their time and they'd just have priced themselves out of the market if they'd tried. So yes, they probably knew what would happen if you put the disk in upside down, but since it wouldn't break anything permanently it wasn't seen as worth the cost of fixing.



For what it's worth, you could swap in pretty much any other computer from the 70s and 80s and there'd be plenty of other issues where the clumsy interactions of novice users could cause bad things to happen with them.






share|improve this answer






























    10















    If you inserted the disk "upside down" the Apple //e would make a hideous noise like a vacuum cleaner.




    Not sure what the 'vacuumer sound' should be. could it be that you're refering to the way the drive returns - and calibrates - to track. I would rather describe it as a fast clicking noise over some scratching.



    Also, there was no different operation between "upside down" or not. Simply as the drive had no way to detect which was the'right' side (*1). In either case the II tried to read the disk. The difference may eventually have been that there was nothing to read on the back side (of the disks you used), resulting in an endless attempt to read.



    There was effectively no room in the 256 byte ROM of the disk controller for a more sophisticated error recovery than to try again and again and again...




    Why? To me what a shocking design;




    Because it's an awesome simple design. The head ist moved across the racks by a spiraled disk. Turned in one direction the head moves outward toward track 35, when reversed it turns toward track 0. After power up/reset the head may be positioned at any of the tracks. So it needs to move in a way to get to a defined point - with track 0 being a desirable goal.



    There is no way to tell on what track it is, so the computer moves the head back toward track 0. Now, they could have installed a sensor telling when track 0 is reached. Except, Woz tried to minimize parts and logic, so he devised a way to do it without a sensor and electronics. So the spiral disk was made in a way that the head simply hits a stop were track 0 is supposed to be. Now the controller can always turn the head back for full 35 tracks. It'll move until it hits the stop. after that the disk continues to move (until all 25 steps are done), but the slider moving the head just jumps the spiral track, as the head can't move anymore.



    Splendid solution to solve an enginering problem without any logic, sensors and whatsoever, just a groove in a disk.




    it scared the heck out of me as a newb. Was that usual to do that to a user?




    Jup.




    I never really recovered from that; I was put off computers for the rest of high school.




    If it got you off that easy, I guess there where other things for you to enjoy.




    Why design a computer like that for newbs?




    The computer wasn't designed for 'newbs' at all, it was designed as a computer for general use. A quite cost efficient design, which BTW saved Apple several times from otherwise disastrous failures.




    *1 - A fact that many owners used to double their disk capacity - either by adding a second write notch at the opposite side or by adding a Protected/Standard/Unprotected switch to their floppies.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      @athornton My childhood computer would scream at me very loudly for several minutes whenever I turned it on (something wrong with the Del key, I assume) and would then proceed to try to erase all of my files. It terrified me. This wasn't enough to stop me messing around with it. YMMV.

      – wizzwizz4
      Jun 26 at 23:12






    • 5





      @BruceAbbott, a $2 microswitch, and a pin to read it, and circuit-board traces (or wires) connecting the two, and code for reading and interpreting it, and ROM space to store the code. A limit switch would have cost significantly more than the bare price of the switch.

      – Mark
      Jun 27 at 0:52






    • 3





      I dunno... To me those Apple II's sounded like the Greek Sirens lulling me astray. I never came back.

      – Geo...
      Jun 27 at 1:02






    • 2





      This answer gives a fine explanation of why the drive makes loud noises, but it doesn't seem to explain why it makes a different noise when the disk is inserted upside-down.

      – Kaz
      Jun 27 at 7:08






    • 4





      @athornton "Well it was thrown at newbs! High school kids who had never seen a computer!" Then that's the school's fault for not telling you to not put disks in upside down. "That occurred with every //e in the lab if you put the disk in upside down" That's your fault for not thinking "Hey, let's not put the disk in upside-down next time".

      – TripeHound
      Jun 27 at 11:10


















    3














    This was the sound it would make anytime it tried to access an unformatted or unreadable disk, as it continuously tried and retried reading it.



    Because the Apple Disk II only used one side of a floppy disk, the unused side would usually be unformatted.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Unless you were using flippy disks. *8')

      – Mark Booth
      Jun 28 at 17:23











    • And not if you're booting. The boot ROM doesn't care - it'll just spin silently forever.

      – Nick Westgate
      2 days ago














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "648"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11486%2fwhy-did-the-apple-iie-make-a-hideous-noise-if-you-inserted-the-disk-upside-down%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    111














    While some floppy drives have a sensor to determine when the head is at the outermost position, the Apple uses four approaches:



    1. On startup, it blindly tries to move the head outward about 40 tracks. When the motor hits the end stop it will be unable to move further and will consequently stop. Once the Apple has done this, it will assume the head is at the outermost track.


    2. When formatting a disk, the Apple uses the same procedure to force the head to the outermost track.


    3. The Apple will keep track of how it has moved the head in and out since it forced it to the end stop, and will thus generally know where it expects the head to be. Because each track of a formatted disk includes markers that identify it, the Apple will generally assume that if it thinks it's on e.g. track 12, and it sees a marker for track 12, then it is in fact on track 12 and it can proceed on that basis.


    4. If the Apple is unable to see markers that indicate that it's where it thinks it should be, it will force the head to the outermost track, then step it by the proper number of steps to reach the proper position, and look again.


    The noise you heard was from step 4. When trying to access a valid formatted disk, the Apple will generally not need to run the head against the end stop, but the back side of most disks won't typically be validly formatted.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 6





      Note that this isn't unique to Apple. I have yet to encounter a drive that didn't behave this way, it's just more modern drives are quieter about it and the stepper motors move the heads faster so it doesn't last as long. It even applies to hard disks but you won't encounter it unless you have a dying drive.

      – Loren Pechtel
      Jun 28 at 3:25






    • 3





      @LorenPechtel: The Commodore 1571 drive has an optical sensor, as does the IBM PC; I think 3.5" drives have also had sensors from the beginning.

      – supercat
      Jun 28 at 4:35











    • Yes, this is the correct reason for the noise. I owned an Apple //e as a child (and still have it today!) and encounter this noise whenever I try to use a corrupted disk - the issue is that the drive is trying to recalibrate itself and gets really noisy while doing so.

      – TheHansinator
      Jun 28 at 16:16






    • 1





      Yes, this is the correct answer. Any un-formatted or corrupted disk will make the same sound. The back side is usable if you cut out a notch to allow writing. There was a big motivation to use the back side, the first floppies that I bought were $4 each! When I heard the noise, I was usually mad, not scared, it meant that my expensive floppy had a problem. The OP accepted the answer that he/she wanted to hear.

      – Mattman944
      Jun 29 at 8:14











    • @Mattman944 ...or never hear again

      – A C
      Jun 30 at 7:05















    111














    While some floppy drives have a sensor to determine when the head is at the outermost position, the Apple uses four approaches:



    1. On startup, it blindly tries to move the head outward about 40 tracks. When the motor hits the end stop it will be unable to move further and will consequently stop. Once the Apple has done this, it will assume the head is at the outermost track.


    2. When formatting a disk, the Apple uses the same procedure to force the head to the outermost track.


    3. The Apple will keep track of how it has moved the head in and out since it forced it to the end stop, and will thus generally know where it expects the head to be. Because each track of a formatted disk includes markers that identify it, the Apple will generally assume that if it thinks it's on e.g. track 12, and it sees a marker for track 12, then it is in fact on track 12 and it can proceed on that basis.


    4. If the Apple is unable to see markers that indicate that it's where it thinks it should be, it will force the head to the outermost track, then step it by the proper number of steps to reach the proper position, and look again.


    The noise you heard was from step 4. When trying to access a valid formatted disk, the Apple will generally not need to run the head against the end stop, but the back side of most disks won't typically be validly formatted.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 6





      Note that this isn't unique to Apple. I have yet to encounter a drive that didn't behave this way, it's just more modern drives are quieter about it and the stepper motors move the heads faster so it doesn't last as long. It even applies to hard disks but you won't encounter it unless you have a dying drive.

      – Loren Pechtel
      Jun 28 at 3:25






    • 3





      @LorenPechtel: The Commodore 1571 drive has an optical sensor, as does the IBM PC; I think 3.5" drives have also had sensors from the beginning.

      – supercat
      Jun 28 at 4:35











    • Yes, this is the correct reason for the noise. I owned an Apple //e as a child (and still have it today!) and encounter this noise whenever I try to use a corrupted disk - the issue is that the drive is trying to recalibrate itself and gets really noisy while doing so.

      – TheHansinator
      Jun 28 at 16:16






    • 1





      Yes, this is the correct answer. Any un-formatted or corrupted disk will make the same sound. The back side is usable if you cut out a notch to allow writing. There was a big motivation to use the back side, the first floppies that I bought were $4 each! When I heard the noise, I was usually mad, not scared, it meant that my expensive floppy had a problem. The OP accepted the answer that he/she wanted to hear.

      – Mattman944
      Jun 29 at 8:14











    • @Mattman944 ...or never hear again

      – A C
      Jun 30 at 7:05













    111












    111








    111







    While some floppy drives have a sensor to determine when the head is at the outermost position, the Apple uses four approaches:



    1. On startup, it blindly tries to move the head outward about 40 tracks. When the motor hits the end stop it will be unable to move further and will consequently stop. Once the Apple has done this, it will assume the head is at the outermost track.


    2. When formatting a disk, the Apple uses the same procedure to force the head to the outermost track.


    3. The Apple will keep track of how it has moved the head in and out since it forced it to the end stop, and will thus generally know where it expects the head to be. Because each track of a formatted disk includes markers that identify it, the Apple will generally assume that if it thinks it's on e.g. track 12, and it sees a marker for track 12, then it is in fact on track 12 and it can proceed on that basis.


    4. If the Apple is unable to see markers that indicate that it's where it thinks it should be, it will force the head to the outermost track, then step it by the proper number of steps to reach the proper position, and look again.


    The noise you heard was from step 4. When trying to access a valid formatted disk, the Apple will generally not need to run the head against the end stop, but the back side of most disks won't typically be validly formatted.






    share|improve this answer













    While some floppy drives have a sensor to determine when the head is at the outermost position, the Apple uses four approaches:



    1. On startup, it blindly tries to move the head outward about 40 tracks. When the motor hits the end stop it will be unable to move further and will consequently stop. Once the Apple has done this, it will assume the head is at the outermost track.


    2. When formatting a disk, the Apple uses the same procedure to force the head to the outermost track.


    3. The Apple will keep track of how it has moved the head in and out since it forced it to the end stop, and will thus generally know where it expects the head to be. Because each track of a formatted disk includes markers that identify it, the Apple will generally assume that if it thinks it's on e.g. track 12, and it sees a marker for track 12, then it is in fact on track 12 and it can proceed on that basis.


    4. If the Apple is unable to see markers that indicate that it's where it thinks it should be, it will force the head to the outermost track, then step it by the proper number of steps to reach the proper position, and look again.


    The noise you heard was from step 4. When trying to access a valid formatted disk, the Apple will generally not need to run the head against the end stop, but the back side of most disks won't typically be validly formatted.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jun 27 at 15:34









    supercatsupercat

    10.1k2 gold badges14 silver badges46 bronze badges




    10.1k2 gold badges14 silver badges46 bronze badges







    • 6





      Note that this isn't unique to Apple. I have yet to encounter a drive that didn't behave this way, it's just more modern drives are quieter about it and the stepper motors move the heads faster so it doesn't last as long. It even applies to hard disks but you won't encounter it unless you have a dying drive.

      – Loren Pechtel
      Jun 28 at 3:25






    • 3





      @LorenPechtel: The Commodore 1571 drive has an optical sensor, as does the IBM PC; I think 3.5" drives have also had sensors from the beginning.

      – supercat
      Jun 28 at 4:35











    • Yes, this is the correct reason for the noise. I owned an Apple //e as a child (and still have it today!) and encounter this noise whenever I try to use a corrupted disk - the issue is that the drive is trying to recalibrate itself and gets really noisy while doing so.

      – TheHansinator
      Jun 28 at 16:16






    • 1





      Yes, this is the correct answer. Any un-formatted or corrupted disk will make the same sound. The back side is usable if you cut out a notch to allow writing. There was a big motivation to use the back side, the first floppies that I bought were $4 each! When I heard the noise, I was usually mad, not scared, it meant that my expensive floppy had a problem. The OP accepted the answer that he/she wanted to hear.

      – Mattman944
      Jun 29 at 8:14











    • @Mattman944 ...or never hear again

      – A C
      Jun 30 at 7:05












    • 6





      Note that this isn't unique to Apple. I have yet to encounter a drive that didn't behave this way, it's just more modern drives are quieter about it and the stepper motors move the heads faster so it doesn't last as long. It even applies to hard disks but you won't encounter it unless you have a dying drive.

      – Loren Pechtel
      Jun 28 at 3:25






    • 3





      @LorenPechtel: The Commodore 1571 drive has an optical sensor, as does the IBM PC; I think 3.5" drives have also had sensors from the beginning.

      – supercat
      Jun 28 at 4:35











    • Yes, this is the correct reason for the noise. I owned an Apple //e as a child (and still have it today!) and encounter this noise whenever I try to use a corrupted disk - the issue is that the drive is trying to recalibrate itself and gets really noisy while doing so.

      – TheHansinator
      Jun 28 at 16:16






    • 1





      Yes, this is the correct answer. Any un-formatted or corrupted disk will make the same sound. The back side is usable if you cut out a notch to allow writing. There was a big motivation to use the back side, the first floppies that I bought were $4 each! When I heard the noise, I was usually mad, not scared, it meant that my expensive floppy had a problem. The OP accepted the answer that he/she wanted to hear.

      – Mattman944
      Jun 29 at 8:14











    • @Mattman944 ...or never hear again

      – A C
      Jun 30 at 7:05







    6




    6





    Note that this isn't unique to Apple. I have yet to encounter a drive that didn't behave this way, it's just more modern drives are quieter about it and the stepper motors move the heads faster so it doesn't last as long. It even applies to hard disks but you won't encounter it unless you have a dying drive.

    – Loren Pechtel
    Jun 28 at 3:25





    Note that this isn't unique to Apple. I have yet to encounter a drive that didn't behave this way, it's just more modern drives are quieter about it and the stepper motors move the heads faster so it doesn't last as long. It even applies to hard disks but you won't encounter it unless you have a dying drive.

    – Loren Pechtel
    Jun 28 at 3:25




    3




    3





    @LorenPechtel: The Commodore 1571 drive has an optical sensor, as does the IBM PC; I think 3.5" drives have also had sensors from the beginning.

    – supercat
    Jun 28 at 4:35





    @LorenPechtel: The Commodore 1571 drive has an optical sensor, as does the IBM PC; I think 3.5" drives have also had sensors from the beginning.

    – supercat
    Jun 28 at 4:35













    Yes, this is the correct reason for the noise. I owned an Apple //e as a child (and still have it today!) and encounter this noise whenever I try to use a corrupted disk - the issue is that the drive is trying to recalibrate itself and gets really noisy while doing so.

    – TheHansinator
    Jun 28 at 16:16





    Yes, this is the correct reason for the noise. I owned an Apple //e as a child (and still have it today!) and encounter this noise whenever I try to use a corrupted disk - the issue is that the drive is trying to recalibrate itself and gets really noisy while doing so.

    – TheHansinator
    Jun 28 at 16:16




    1




    1





    Yes, this is the correct answer. Any un-formatted or corrupted disk will make the same sound. The back side is usable if you cut out a notch to allow writing. There was a big motivation to use the back side, the first floppies that I bought were $4 each! When I heard the noise, I was usually mad, not scared, it meant that my expensive floppy had a problem. The OP accepted the answer that he/she wanted to hear.

    – Mattman944
    Jun 29 at 8:14





    Yes, this is the correct answer. Any un-formatted or corrupted disk will make the same sound. The back side is usable if you cut out a notch to allow writing. There was a big motivation to use the back side, the first floppies that I bought were $4 each! When I heard the noise, I was usually mad, not scared, it meant that my expensive floppy had a problem. The OP accepted the answer that he/she wanted to hear.

    – Mattman944
    Jun 29 at 8:14













    @Mattman944 ...or never hear again

    – A C
    Jun 30 at 7:05





    @Mattman944 ...or never hear again

    – A C
    Jun 30 at 7:05













    13














    The short answer is they did it to save money. They could have made the drive behave better when a disk is inserted upside down, but that would have required larger ROM chips to store the firmware or more expensive drives and controllers to detect the problem.



    As long as it didn't damage the computer such behaviours were considered acceptable to get the price down.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 17





      That's simply wrong, as the drive didn't behave different according to which side was 'up'

      – Raffzahn
      Jun 27 at 11:59






    • 4





      @Raffzahn what does that have to do with anything? I'm saying that any less-than-optimal behaviour was mostly just due to it costing more money to implement better behaviour, like detecting when the disk is in upside down or a better abort procedure so it doesn't keep grinding away for minutes on end.

      – user
      Jun 27 at 14:08






    • 5





      @Raffzahn That's the point.

      – TKK
      Jun 27 at 19:19






    • 7





      This answer is still wrong. The drive made the same noise for an unformatted disk. The backside of a disk is unformatted (unless you punch a hole to disable write protection and format it, which basically all Apple II users did to save money). The drive has no way to know if the disk is upside down or not. The drive has no way to know if the disk is unformatted or not. They couldn't have made the drive "behave better", no matter how more expensive it was. The software that made the noise was actually in RAM, and not in ROM (unless you booted, when it always would make that noise).

      – dirkt
      Jun 28 at 5:50







    • 4





      Repeat after me: There are no orientation sensors for disks. Because 5.25" floppy disks are symmetrical, there's no way to know which side is up when you put them into a drive. They could have added a sensor for track 0, which they omitted, so the way to recalibrate is to move the read-write head to lower tracks for like 80 tracks, and when it bumps into a mechanical stopper, it makes that noise.

      – dirkt
      Jun 28 at 11:02
















    13














    The short answer is they did it to save money. They could have made the drive behave better when a disk is inserted upside down, but that would have required larger ROM chips to store the firmware or more expensive drives and controllers to detect the problem.



    As long as it didn't damage the computer such behaviours were considered acceptable to get the price down.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 17





      That's simply wrong, as the drive didn't behave different according to which side was 'up'

      – Raffzahn
      Jun 27 at 11:59






    • 4





      @Raffzahn what does that have to do with anything? I'm saying that any less-than-optimal behaviour was mostly just due to it costing more money to implement better behaviour, like detecting when the disk is in upside down or a better abort procedure so it doesn't keep grinding away for minutes on end.

      – user
      Jun 27 at 14:08






    • 5





      @Raffzahn That's the point.

      – TKK
      Jun 27 at 19:19






    • 7





      This answer is still wrong. The drive made the same noise for an unformatted disk. The backside of a disk is unformatted (unless you punch a hole to disable write protection and format it, which basically all Apple II users did to save money). The drive has no way to know if the disk is upside down or not. The drive has no way to know if the disk is unformatted or not. They couldn't have made the drive "behave better", no matter how more expensive it was. The software that made the noise was actually in RAM, and not in ROM (unless you booted, when it always would make that noise).

      – dirkt
      Jun 28 at 5:50







    • 4





      Repeat after me: There are no orientation sensors for disks. Because 5.25" floppy disks are symmetrical, there's no way to know which side is up when you put them into a drive. They could have added a sensor for track 0, which they omitted, so the way to recalibrate is to move the read-write head to lower tracks for like 80 tracks, and when it bumps into a mechanical stopper, it makes that noise.

      – dirkt
      Jun 28 at 11:02














    13












    13








    13







    The short answer is they did it to save money. They could have made the drive behave better when a disk is inserted upside down, but that would have required larger ROM chips to store the firmware or more expensive drives and controllers to detect the problem.



    As long as it didn't damage the computer such behaviours were considered acceptable to get the price down.






    share|improve this answer













    The short answer is they did it to save money. They could have made the drive behave better when a disk is inserted upside down, but that would have required larger ROM chips to store the firmware or more expensive drives and controllers to detect the problem.



    As long as it didn't damage the computer such behaviours were considered acceptable to get the price down.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jun 27 at 10:06









    useruser

    6,9561 gold badge12 silver badges31 bronze badges




    6,9561 gold badge12 silver badges31 bronze badges







    • 17





      That's simply wrong, as the drive didn't behave different according to which side was 'up'

      – Raffzahn
      Jun 27 at 11:59






    • 4





      @Raffzahn what does that have to do with anything? I'm saying that any less-than-optimal behaviour was mostly just due to it costing more money to implement better behaviour, like detecting when the disk is in upside down or a better abort procedure so it doesn't keep grinding away for minutes on end.

      – user
      Jun 27 at 14:08






    • 5





      @Raffzahn That's the point.

      – TKK
      Jun 27 at 19:19






    • 7





      This answer is still wrong. The drive made the same noise for an unformatted disk. The backside of a disk is unformatted (unless you punch a hole to disable write protection and format it, which basically all Apple II users did to save money). The drive has no way to know if the disk is upside down or not. The drive has no way to know if the disk is unformatted or not. They couldn't have made the drive "behave better", no matter how more expensive it was. The software that made the noise was actually in RAM, and not in ROM (unless you booted, when it always would make that noise).

      – dirkt
      Jun 28 at 5:50







    • 4





      Repeat after me: There are no orientation sensors for disks. Because 5.25" floppy disks are symmetrical, there's no way to know which side is up when you put them into a drive. They could have added a sensor for track 0, which they omitted, so the way to recalibrate is to move the read-write head to lower tracks for like 80 tracks, and when it bumps into a mechanical stopper, it makes that noise.

      – dirkt
      Jun 28 at 11:02













    • 17





      That's simply wrong, as the drive didn't behave different according to which side was 'up'

      – Raffzahn
      Jun 27 at 11:59






    • 4





      @Raffzahn what does that have to do with anything? I'm saying that any less-than-optimal behaviour was mostly just due to it costing more money to implement better behaviour, like detecting when the disk is in upside down or a better abort procedure so it doesn't keep grinding away for minutes on end.

      – user
      Jun 27 at 14:08






    • 5





      @Raffzahn That's the point.

      – TKK
      Jun 27 at 19:19






    • 7





      This answer is still wrong. The drive made the same noise for an unformatted disk. The backside of a disk is unformatted (unless you punch a hole to disable write protection and format it, which basically all Apple II users did to save money). The drive has no way to know if the disk is upside down or not. The drive has no way to know if the disk is unformatted or not. They couldn't have made the drive "behave better", no matter how more expensive it was. The software that made the noise was actually in RAM, and not in ROM (unless you booted, when it always would make that noise).

      – dirkt
      Jun 28 at 5:50







    • 4





      Repeat after me: There are no orientation sensors for disks. Because 5.25" floppy disks are symmetrical, there's no way to know which side is up when you put them into a drive. They could have added a sensor for track 0, which they omitted, so the way to recalibrate is to move the read-write head to lower tracks for like 80 tracks, and when it bumps into a mechanical stopper, it makes that noise.

      – dirkt
      Jun 28 at 11:02








    17




    17





    That's simply wrong, as the drive didn't behave different according to which side was 'up'

    – Raffzahn
    Jun 27 at 11:59





    That's simply wrong, as the drive didn't behave different according to which side was 'up'

    – Raffzahn
    Jun 27 at 11:59




    4




    4





    @Raffzahn what does that have to do with anything? I'm saying that any less-than-optimal behaviour was mostly just due to it costing more money to implement better behaviour, like detecting when the disk is in upside down or a better abort procedure so it doesn't keep grinding away for minutes on end.

    – user
    Jun 27 at 14:08





    @Raffzahn what does that have to do with anything? I'm saying that any less-than-optimal behaviour was mostly just due to it costing more money to implement better behaviour, like detecting when the disk is in upside down or a better abort procedure so it doesn't keep grinding away for minutes on end.

    – user
    Jun 27 at 14:08




    5




    5





    @Raffzahn That's the point.

    – TKK
    Jun 27 at 19:19





    @Raffzahn That's the point.

    – TKK
    Jun 27 at 19:19




    7




    7





    This answer is still wrong. The drive made the same noise for an unformatted disk. The backside of a disk is unformatted (unless you punch a hole to disable write protection and format it, which basically all Apple II users did to save money). The drive has no way to know if the disk is upside down or not. The drive has no way to know if the disk is unformatted or not. They couldn't have made the drive "behave better", no matter how more expensive it was. The software that made the noise was actually in RAM, and not in ROM (unless you booted, when it always would make that noise).

    – dirkt
    Jun 28 at 5:50






    This answer is still wrong. The drive made the same noise for an unformatted disk. The backside of a disk is unformatted (unless you punch a hole to disable write protection and format it, which basically all Apple II users did to save money). The drive has no way to know if the disk is upside down or not. The drive has no way to know if the disk is unformatted or not. They couldn't have made the drive "behave better", no matter how more expensive it was. The software that made the noise was actually in RAM, and not in ROM (unless you booted, when it always would make that noise).

    – dirkt
    Jun 28 at 5:50





    4




    4





    Repeat after me: There are no orientation sensors for disks. Because 5.25" floppy disks are symmetrical, there's no way to know which side is up when you put them into a drive. They could have added a sensor for track 0, which they omitted, so the way to recalibrate is to move the read-write head to lower tracks for like 80 tracks, and when it bumps into a mechanical stopper, it makes that noise.

    – dirkt
    Jun 28 at 11:02






    Repeat after me: There are no orientation sensors for disks. Because 5.25" floppy disks are symmetrical, there's no way to know which side is up when you put them into a drive. They could have added a sensor for track 0, which they omitted, so the way to recalibrate is to move the read-write head to lower tracks for like 80 tracks, and when it bumps into a mechanical stopper, it makes that noise.

    – dirkt
    Jun 28 at 11:02












    11














    The obvious answer is that it wasn't designed 'for newbs' but as a general purpose personal computer that would find its way into many homes and businesses as well as educational establishments. Even in the latter, they also had to be suitable for running some fairly advanced software as well as for introductory courses.



    By the standards of the 70s, when serious computing was generally the realm of the scientifically literate, the Apple II was pretty user friendly though. It actually had a monitor and keyboard, you didn't need to flip switches and look at lights to boot it up, and programming errors gave fairly comprehensible error messages.



    It also had to be built to a budget though, so they couldn't design it to prevent every instance of user error from causing problems without the cost ballooning. Apple computers were already relatively expensive for their time and they'd just have priced themselves out of the market if they'd tried. So yes, they probably knew what would happen if you put the disk in upside down, but since it wouldn't break anything permanently it wasn't seen as worth the cost of fixing.



    For what it's worth, you could swap in pretty much any other computer from the 70s and 80s and there'd be plenty of other issues where the clumsy interactions of novice users could cause bad things to happen with them.






    share|improve this answer



























      11














      The obvious answer is that it wasn't designed 'for newbs' but as a general purpose personal computer that would find its way into many homes and businesses as well as educational establishments. Even in the latter, they also had to be suitable for running some fairly advanced software as well as for introductory courses.



      By the standards of the 70s, when serious computing was generally the realm of the scientifically literate, the Apple II was pretty user friendly though. It actually had a monitor and keyboard, you didn't need to flip switches and look at lights to boot it up, and programming errors gave fairly comprehensible error messages.



      It also had to be built to a budget though, so they couldn't design it to prevent every instance of user error from causing problems without the cost ballooning. Apple computers were already relatively expensive for their time and they'd just have priced themselves out of the market if they'd tried. So yes, they probably knew what would happen if you put the disk in upside down, but since it wouldn't break anything permanently it wasn't seen as worth the cost of fixing.



      For what it's worth, you could swap in pretty much any other computer from the 70s and 80s and there'd be plenty of other issues where the clumsy interactions of novice users could cause bad things to happen with them.






      share|improve this answer

























        11












        11








        11







        The obvious answer is that it wasn't designed 'for newbs' but as a general purpose personal computer that would find its way into many homes and businesses as well as educational establishments. Even in the latter, they also had to be suitable for running some fairly advanced software as well as for introductory courses.



        By the standards of the 70s, when serious computing was generally the realm of the scientifically literate, the Apple II was pretty user friendly though. It actually had a monitor and keyboard, you didn't need to flip switches and look at lights to boot it up, and programming errors gave fairly comprehensible error messages.



        It also had to be built to a budget though, so they couldn't design it to prevent every instance of user error from causing problems without the cost ballooning. Apple computers were already relatively expensive for their time and they'd just have priced themselves out of the market if they'd tried. So yes, they probably knew what would happen if you put the disk in upside down, but since it wouldn't break anything permanently it wasn't seen as worth the cost of fixing.



        For what it's worth, you could swap in pretty much any other computer from the 70s and 80s and there'd be plenty of other issues where the clumsy interactions of novice users could cause bad things to happen with them.






        share|improve this answer













        The obvious answer is that it wasn't designed 'for newbs' but as a general purpose personal computer that would find its way into many homes and businesses as well as educational establishments. Even in the latter, they also had to be suitable for running some fairly advanced software as well as for introductory courses.



        By the standards of the 70s, when serious computing was generally the realm of the scientifically literate, the Apple II was pretty user friendly though. It actually had a monitor and keyboard, you didn't need to flip switches and look at lights to boot it up, and programming errors gave fairly comprehensible error messages.



        It also had to be built to a budget though, so they couldn't design it to prevent every instance of user error from causing problems without the cost ballooning. Apple computers were already relatively expensive for their time and they'd just have priced themselves out of the market if they'd tried. So yes, they probably knew what would happen if you put the disk in upside down, but since it wouldn't break anything permanently it wasn't seen as worth the cost of fixing.



        For what it's worth, you could swap in pretty much any other computer from the 70s and 80s and there'd be plenty of other issues where the clumsy interactions of novice users could cause bad things to happen with them.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jun 27 at 3:25









        Matthew BarberMatthew Barber

        1,3242 silver badges9 bronze badges




        1,3242 silver badges9 bronze badges





















            10















            If you inserted the disk "upside down" the Apple //e would make a hideous noise like a vacuum cleaner.




            Not sure what the 'vacuumer sound' should be. could it be that you're refering to the way the drive returns - and calibrates - to track. I would rather describe it as a fast clicking noise over some scratching.



            Also, there was no different operation between "upside down" or not. Simply as the drive had no way to detect which was the'right' side (*1). In either case the II tried to read the disk. The difference may eventually have been that there was nothing to read on the back side (of the disks you used), resulting in an endless attempt to read.



            There was effectively no room in the 256 byte ROM of the disk controller for a more sophisticated error recovery than to try again and again and again...




            Why? To me what a shocking design;




            Because it's an awesome simple design. The head ist moved across the racks by a spiraled disk. Turned in one direction the head moves outward toward track 35, when reversed it turns toward track 0. After power up/reset the head may be positioned at any of the tracks. So it needs to move in a way to get to a defined point - with track 0 being a desirable goal.



            There is no way to tell on what track it is, so the computer moves the head back toward track 0. Now, they could have installed a sensor telling when track 0 is reached. Except, Woz tried to minimize parts and logic, so he devised a way to do it without a sensor and electronics. So the spiral disk was made in a way that the head simply hits a stop were track 0 is supposed to be. Now the controller can always turn the head back for full 35 tracks. It'll move until it hits the stop. after that the disk continues to move (until all 25 steps are done), but the slider moving the head just jumps the spiral track, as the head can't move anymore.



            Splendid solution to solve an enginering problem without any logic, sensors and whatsoever, just a groove in a disk.




            it scared the heck out of me as a newb. Was that usual to do that to a user?




            Jup.




            I never really recovered from that; I was put off computers for the rest of high school.




            If it got you off that easy, I guess there where other things for you to enjoy.




            Why design a computer like that for newbs?




            The computer wasn't designed for 'newbs' at all, it was designed as a computer for general use. A quite cost efficient design, which BTW saved Apple several times from otherwise disastrous failures.




            *1 - A fact that many owners used to double their disk capacity - either by adding a second write notch at the opposite side or by adding a Protected/Standard/Unprotected switch to their floppies.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 3





              @athornton My childhood computer would scream at me very loudly for several minutes whenever I turned it on (something wrong with the Del key, I assume) and would then proceed to try to erase all of my files. It terrified me. This wasn't enough to stop me messing around with it. YMMV.

              – wizzwizz4
              Jun 26 at 23:12






            • 5





              @BruceAbbott, a $2 microswitch, and a pin to read it, and circuit-board traces (or wires) connecting the two, and code for reading and interpreting it, and ROM space to store the code. A limit switch would have cost significantly more than the bare price of the switch.

              – Mark
              Jun 27 at 0:52






            • 3





              I dunno... To me those Apple II's sounded like the Greek Sirens lulling me astray. I never came back.

              – Geo...
              Jun 27 at 1:02






            • 2





              This answer gives a fine explanation of why the drive makes loud noises, but it doesn't seem to explain why it makes a different noise when the disk is inserted upside-down.

              – Kaz
              Jun 27 at 7:08






            • 4





              @athornton "Well it was thrown at newbs! High school kids who had never seen a computer!" Then that's the school's fault for not telling you to not put disks in upside down. "That occurred with every //e in the lab if you put the disk in upside down" That's your fault for not thinking "Hey, let's not put the disk in upside-down next time".

              – TripeHound
              Jun 27 at 11:10















            10















            If you inserted the disk "upside down" the Apple //e would make a hideous noise like a vacuum cleaner.




            Not sure what the 'vacuumer sound' should be. could it be that you're refering to the way the drive returns - and calibrates - to track. I would rather describe it as a fast clicking noise over some scratching.



            Also, there was no different operation between "upside down" or not. Simply as the drive had no way to detect which was the'right' side (*1). In either case the II tried to read the disk. The difference may eventually have been that there was nothing to read on the back side (of the disks you used), resulting in an endless attempt to read.



            There was effectively no room in the 256 byte ROM of the disk controller for a more sophisticated error recovery than to try again and again and again...




            Why? To me what a shocking design;




            Because it's an awesome simple design. The head ist moved across the racks by a spiraled disk. Turned in one direction the head moves outward toward track 35, when reversed it turns toward track 0. After power up/reset the head may be positioned at any of the tracks. So it needs to move in a way to get to a defined point - with track 0 being a desirable goal.



            There is no way to tell on what track it is, so the computer moves the head back toward track 0. Now, they could have installed a sensor telling when track 0 is reached. Except, Woz tried to minimize parts and logic, so he devised a way to do it without a sensor and electronics. So the spiral disk was made in a way that the head simply hits a stop were track 0 is supposed to be. Now the controller can always turn the head back for full 35 tracks. It'll move until it hits the stop. after that the disk continues to move (until all 25 steps are done), but the slider moving the head just jumps the spiral track, as the head can't move anymore.



            Splendid solution to solve an enginering problem without any logic, sensors and whatsoever, just a groove in a disk.




            it scared the heck out of me as a newb. Was that usual to do that to a user?




            Jup.




            I never really recovered from that; I was put off computers for the rest of high school.




            If it got you off that easy, I guess there where other things for you to enjoy.




            Why design a computer like that for newbs?




            The computer wasn't designed for 'newbs' at all, it was designed as a computer for general use. A quite cost efficient design, which BTW saved Apple several times from otherwise disastrous failures.




            *1 - A fact that many owners used to double their disk capacity - either by adding a second write notch at the opposite side or by adding a Protected/Standard/Unprotected switch to their floppies.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 3





              @athornton My childhood computer would scream at me very loudly for several minutes whenever I turned it on (something wrong with the Del key, I assume) and would then proceed to try to erase all of my files. It terrified me. This wasn't enough to stop me messing around with it. YMMV.

              – wizzwizz4
              Jun 26 at 23:12






            • 5





              @BruceAbbott, a $2 microswitch, and a pin to read it, and circuit-board traces (or wires) connecting the two, and code for reading and interpreting it, and ROM space to store the code. A limit switch would have cost significantly more than the bare price of the switch.

              – Mark
              Jun 27 at 0:52






            • 3





              I dunno... To me those Apple II's sounded like the Greek Sirens lulling me astray. I never came back.

              – Geo...
              Jun 27 at 1:02






            • 2





              This answer gives a fine explanation of why the drive makes loud noises, but it doesn't seem to explain why it makes a different noise when the disk is inserted upside-down.

              – Kaz
              Jun 27 at 7:08






            • 4





              @athornton "Well it was thrown at newbs! High school kids who had never seen a computer!" Then that's the school's fault for not telling you to not put disks in upside down. "That occurred with every //e in the lab if you put the disk in upside down" That's your fault for not thinking "Hey, let's not put the disk in upside-down next time".

              – TripeHound
              Jun 27 at 11:10













            10












            10








            10








            If you inserted the disk "upside down" the Apple //e would make a hideous noise like a vacuum cleaner.




            Not sure what the 'vacuumer sound' should be. could it be that you're refering to the way the drive returns - and calibrates - to track. I would rather describe it as a fast clicking noise over some scratching.



            Also, there was no different operation between "upside down" or not. Simply as the drive had no way to detect which was the'right' side (*1). In either case the II tried to read the disk. The difference may eventually have been that there was nothing to read on the back side (of the disks you used), resulting in an endless attempt to read.



            There was effectively no room in the 256 byte ROM of the disk controller for a more sophisticated error recovery than to try again and again and again...




            Why? To me what a shocking design;




            Because it's an awesome simple design. The head ist moved across the racks by a spiraled disk. Turned in one direction the head moves outward toward track 35, when reversed it turns toward track 0. After power up/reset the head may be positioned at any of the tracks. So it needs to move in a way to get to a defined point - with track 0 being a desirable goal.



            There is no way to tell on what track it is, so the computer moves the head back toward track 0. Now, they could have installed a sensor telling when track 0 is reached. Except, Woz tried to minimize parts and logic, so he devised a way to do it without a sensor and electronics. So the spiral disk was made in a way that the head simply hits a stop were track 0 is supposed to be. Now the controller can always turn the head back for full 35 tracks. It'll move until it hits the stop. after that the disk continues to move (until all 25 steps are done), but the slider moving the head just jumps the spiral track, as the head can't move anymore.



            Splendid solution to solve an enginering problem without any logic, sensors and whatsoever, just a groove in a disk.




            it scared the heck out of me as a newb. Was that usual to do that to a user?




            Jup.




            I never really recovered from that; I was put off computers for the rest of high school.




            If it got you off that easy, I guess there where other things for you to enjoy.




            Why design a computer like that for newbs?




            The computer wasn't designed for 'newbs' at all, it was designed as a computer for general use. A quite cost efficient design, which BTW saved Apple several times from otherwise disastrous failures.




            *1 - A fact that many owners used to double their disk capacity - either by adding a second write notch at the opposite side or by adding a Protected/Standard/Unprotected switch to their floppies.






            share|improve this answer
















            If you inserted the disk "upside down" the Apple //e would make a hideous noise like a vacuum cleaner.




            Not sure what the 'vacuumer sound' should be. could it be that you're refering to the way the drive returns - and calibrates - to track. I would rather describe it as a fast clicking noise over some scratching.



            Also, there was no different operation between "upside down" or not. Simply as the drive had no way to detect which was the'right' side (*1). In either case the II tried to read the disk. The difference may eventually have been that there was nothing to read on the back side (of the disks you used), resulting in an endless attempt to read.



            There was effectively no room in the 256 byte ROM of the disk controller for a more sophisticated error recovery than to try again and again and again...




            Why? To me what a shocking design;




            Because it's an awesome simple design. The head ist moved across the racks by a spiraled disk. Turned in one direction the head moves outward toward track 35, when reversed it turns toward track 0. After power up/reset the head may be positioned at any of the tracks. So it needs to move in a way to get to a defined point - with track 0 being a desirable goal.



            There is no way to tell on what track it is, so the computer moves the head back toward track 0. Now, they could have installed a sensor telling when track 0 is reached. Except, Woz tried to minimize parts and logic, so he devised a way to do it without a sensor and electronics. So the spiral disk was made in a way that the head simply hits a stop were track 0 is supposed to be. Now the controller can always turn the head back for full 35 tracks. It'll move until it hits the stop. after that the disk continues to move (until all 25 steps are done), but the slider moving the head just jumps the spiral track, as the head can't move anymore.



            Splendid solution to solve an enginering problem without any logic, sensors and whatsoever, just a groove in a disk.




            it scared the heck out of me as a newb. Was that usual to do that to a user?




            Jup.




            I never really recovered from that; I was put off computers for the rest of high school.




            If it got you off that easy, I guess there where other things for you to enjoy.




            Why design a computer like that for newbs?




            The computer wasn't designed for 'newbs' at all, it was designed as a computer for general use. A quite cost efficient design, which BTW saved Apple several times from otherwise disastrous failures.




            *1 - A fact that many owners used to double their disk capacity - either by adding a second write notch at the opposite side or by adding a Protected/Standard/Unprotected switch to their floppies.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jun 27 at 12:06

























            answered Jun 26 at 22:53









            RaffzahnRaffzahn

            62.3k6 gold badges152 silver badges256 bronze badges




            62.3k6 gold badges152 silver badges256 bronze badges







            • 3





              @athornton My childhood computer would scream at me very loudly for several minutes whenever I turned it on (something wrong with the Del key, I assume) and would then proceed to try to erase all of my files. It terrified me. This wasn't enough to stop me messing around with it. YMMV.

              – wizzwizz4
              Jun 26 at 23:12






            • 5





              @BruceAbbott, a $2 microswitch, and a pin to read it, and circuit-board traces (or wires) connecting the two, and code for reading and interpreting it, and ROM space to store the code. A limit switch would have cost significantly more than the bare price of the switch.

              – Mark
              Jun 27 at 0:52






            • 3





              I dunno... To me those Apple II's sounded like the Greek Sirens lulling me astray. I never came back.

              – Geo...
              Jun 27 at 1:02






            • 2





              This answer gives a fine explanation of why the drive makes loud noises, but it doesn't seem to explain why it makes a different noise when the disk is inserted upside-down.

              – Kaz
              Jun 27 at 7:08






            • 4





              @athornton "Well it was thrown at newbs! High school kids who had never seen a computer!" Then that's the school's fault for not telling you to not put disks in upside down. "That occurred with every //e in the lab if you put the disk in upside down" That's your fault for not thinking "Hey, let's not put the disk in upside-down next time".

              – TripeHound
              Jun 27 at 11:10












            • 3





              @athornton My childhood computer would scream at me very loudly for several minutes whenever I turned it on (something wrong with the Del key, I assume) and would then proceed to try to erase all of my files. It terrified me. This wasn't enough to stop me messing around with it. YMMV.

              – wizzwizz4
              Jun 26 at 23:12






            • 5





              @BruceAbbott, a $2 microswitch, and a pin to read it, and circuit-board traces (or wires) connecting the two, and code for reading and interpreting it, and ROM space to store the code. A limit switch would have cost significantly more than the bare price of the switch.

              – Mark
              Jun 27 at 0:52






            • 3





              I dunno... To me those Apple II's sounded like the Greek Sirens lulling me astray. I never came back.

              – Geo...
              Jun 27 at 1:02






            • 2





              This answer gives a fine explanation of why the drive makes loud noises, but it doesn't seem to explain why it makes a different noise when the disk is inserted upside-down.

              – Kaz
              Jun 27 at 7:08






            • 4





              @athornton "Well it was thrown at newbs! High school kids who had never seen a computer!" Then that's the school's fault for not telling you to not put disks in upside down. "That occurred with every //e in the lab if you put the disk in upside down" That's your fault for not thinking "Hey, let's not put the disk in upside-down next time".

              – TripeHound
              Jun 27 at 11:10







            3




            3





            @athornton My childhood computer would scream at me very loudly for several minutes whenever I turned it on (something wrong with the Del key, I assume) and would then proceed to try to erase all of my files. It terrified me. This wasn't enough to stop me messing around with it. YMMV.

            – wizzwizz4
            Jun 26 at 23:12





            @athornton My childhood computer would scream at me very loudly for several minutes whenever I turned it on (something wrong with the Del key, I assume) and would then proceed to try to erase all of my files. It terrified me. This wasn't enough to stop me messing around with it. YMMV.

            – wizzwizz4
            Jun 26 at 23:12




            5




            5





            @BruceAbbott, a $2 microswitch, and a pin to read it, and circuit-board traces (or wires) connecting the two, and code for reading and interpreting it, and ROM space to store the code. A limit switch would have cost significantly more than the bare price of the switch.

            – Mark
            Jun 27 at 0:52





            @BruceAbbott, a $2 microswitch, and a pin to read it, and circuit-board traces (or wires) connecting the two, and code for reading and interpreting it, and ROM space to store the code. A limit switch would have cost significantly more than the bare price of the switch.

            – Mark
            Jun 27 at 0:52




            3




            3





            I dunno... To me those Apple II's sounded like the Greek Sirens lulling me astray. I never came back.

            – Geo...
            Jun 27 at 1:02





            I dunno... To me those Apple II's sounded like the Greek Sirens lulling me astray. I never came back.

            – Geo...
            Jun 27 at 1:02




            2




            2





            This answer gives a fine explanation of why the drive makes loud noises, but it doesn't seem to explain why it makes a different noise when the disk is inserted upside-down.

            – Kaz
            Jun 27 at 7:08





            This answer gives a fine explanation of why the drive makes loud noises, but it doesn't seem to explain why it makes a different noise when the disk is inserted upside-down.

            – Kaz
            Jun 27 at 7:08




            4




            4





            @athornton "Well it was thrown at newbs! High school kids who had never seen a computer!" Then that's the school's fault for not telling you to not put disks in upside down. "That occurred with every //e in the lab if you put the disk in upside down" That's your fault for not thinking "Hey, let's not put the disk in upside-down next time".

            – TripeHound
            Jun 27 at 11:10





            @athornton "Well it was thrown at newbs! High school kids who had never seen a computer!" Then that's the school's fault for not telling you to not put disks in upside down. "That occurred with every //e in the lab if you put the disk in upside down" That's your fault for not thinking "Hey, let's not put the disk in upside-down next time".

            – TripeHound
            Jun 27 at 11:10











            3














            This was the sound it would make anytime it tried to access an unformatted or unreadable disk, as it continuously tried and retried reading it.



            Because the Apple Disk II only used one side of a floppy disk, the unused side would usually be unformatted.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Unless you were using flippy disks. *8')

              – Mark Booth
              Jun 28 at 17:23











            • And not if you're booting. The boot ROM doesn't care - it'll just spin silently forever.

              – Nick Westgate
              2 days ago
















            3














            This was the sound it would make anytime it tried to access an unformatted or unreadable disk, as it continuously tried and retried reading it.



            Because the Apple Disk II only used one side of a floppy disk, the unused side would usually be unformatted.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Unless you were using flippy disks. *8')

              – Mark Booth
              Jun 28 at 17:23











            • And not if you're booting. The boot ROM doesn't care - it'll just spin silently forever.

              – Nick Westgate
              2 days ago














            3












            3








            3







            This was the sound it would make anytime it tried to access an unformatted or unreadable disk, as it continuously tried and retried reading it.



            Because the Apple Disk II only used one side of a floppy disk, the unused side would usually be unformatted.






            share|improve this answer















            This was the sound it would make anytime it tried to access an unformatted or unreadable disk, as it continuously tried and retried reading it.



            Because the Apple Disk II only used one side of a floppy disk, the unused side would usually be unformatted.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jun 28 at 9:27









            Kaz

            3,01710 silver badges47 bronze badges




            3,01710 silver badges47 bronze badges










            answered Jun 28 at 0:50









            TimTim

            372 bronze badges




            372 bronze badges












            • Unless you were using flippy disks. *8')

              – Mark Booth
              Jun 28 at 17:23











            • And not if you're booting. The boot ROM doesn't care - it'll just spin silently forever.

              – Nick Westgate
              2 days ago


















            • Unless you were using flippy disks. *8')

              – Mark Booth
              Jun 28 at 17:23











            • And not if you're booting. The boot ROM doesn't care - it'll just spin silently forever.

              – Nick Westgate
              2 days ago

















            Unless you were using flippy disks. *8')

            – Mark Booth
            Jun 28 at 17:23





            Unless you were using flippy disks. *8')

            – Mark Booth
            Jun 28 at 17:23













            And not if you're booting. The boot ROM doesn't care - it'll just spin silently forever.

            – Nick Westgate
            2 days ago






            And not if you're booting. The boot ROM doesn't care - it'll just spin silently forever.

            – Nick Westgate
            2 days ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11486%2fwhy-did-the-apple-iie-make-a-hideous-noise-if-you-inserted-the-disk-upside-down%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?