Which Roman general was killed by his own soldiers for not letting them to loot a newly conquered city?

Based on what criteria do you add/not add icons to labels within a toolbar?

How do I get the =LEFT function in excel, to also take the number zero as the first number?

Is an "are" omitted in this sentence

Premier League simulation

How to check a file was encrypted (really & correctly)

Will a research paper be retracted if the code (which was made publically available ) is shown have a flaw in the logic?

Which genus do I use for neutral expressions in German?

Our group keeps dying during the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign. What are we doing wrong?

What is an air conditioner compressor hard start kit and how does it work?

What is the probability of a biased coin coming up heads given that a liar is claiming that the coin came up heads?

Why do dragons like shiny stuff?

Can a Hogwarts student refuse the Sorting Hat's decision?

Make a living as a math programming freelancer?

Could an areostationary satellite help locate asteroids?

Non-small objects in categories

In MTG, was there ever a five-color deck that worked well?

What does the ISO setting for mechanical 35mm film cameras actually do?

The meaning of "scale" in "because diversions scale so easily wealth becomes concentrated"

How to switch an 80286 from protected to real mode?

Getting Lost in the Caves of Chaos

The Game of the Century - why didn't Byrne take the rook after he forked Fischer?

How to touch up scratches on a black anodized aluminum flashlight?

Is the first page of a novel really that important?

A verb for when some rights are not violated?



Which Roman general was killed by his own soldiers for not letting them to loot a newly conquered city?







.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








9















I read about a Roman king/general who was killed by his own soldiers for not letting them to plunder/loot a newly conquered city.



I think, he allowed them to plunder a city in his previous conquest, and the soldiers expected him to do the same during a latter conquest. But, he didn't agree.



I completely forgot his name.



Who was he?










share|improve this question



















  • 5





    Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review our site tour and help center, and in particular How to Ask.

    – sempaiscuba
    Jul 26 at 14:42






  • 1





    @sempaiscuba man those guys at AskHistorians take anything and everything as a question. Most of their filters are directed to answers. Should we also reconsider our approach? Though yeah, we proportionally have more questions which get answered

    – Rohit
    Jul 26 at 21:03







  • 3





    @Rohit If you think you can make a case for a change in our approach, it's probably worth raising it as a question on our meta site.

    – sempaiscuba
    Jul 26 at 21:11

















9















I read about a Roman king/general who was killed by his own soldiers for not letting them to plunder/loot a newly conquered city.



I think, he allowed them to plunder a city in his previous conquest, and the soldiers expected him to do the same during a latter conquest. But, he didn't agree.



I completely forgot his name.



Who was he?










share|improve this question



















  • 5





    Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review our site tour and help center, and in particular How to Ask.

    – sempaiscuba
    Jul 26 at 14:42






  • 1





    @sempaiscuba man those guys at AskHistorians take anything and everything as a question. Most of their filters are directed to answers. Should we also reconsider our approach? Though yeah, we proportionally have more questions which get answered

    – Rohit
    Jul 26 at 21:03







  • 3





    @Rohit If you think you can make a case for a change in our approach, it's probably worth raising it as a question on our meta site.

    – sempaiscuba
    Jul 26 at 21:11













9












9








9


3






I read about a Roman king/general who was killed by his own soldiers for not letting them to plunder/loot a newly conquered city.



I think, he allowed them to plunder a city in his previous conquest, and the soldiers expected him to do the same during a latter conquest. But, he didn't agree.



I completely forgot his name.



Who was he?










share|improve this question














I read about a Roman king/general who was killed by his own soldiers for not letting them to plunder/loot a newly conquered city.



I think, he allowed them to plunder a city in his previous conquest, and the soldiers expected him to do the same during a latter conquest. But, he didn't agree.



I completely forgot his name.



Who was he?







rome






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jul 26 at 14:36









user366312user366312

1514 bronze badges




1514 bronze badges










  • 5





    Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review our site tour and help center, and in particular How to Ask.

    – sempaiscuba
    Jul 26 at 14:42






  • 1





    @sempaiscuba man those guys at AskHistorians take anything and everything as a question. Most of their filters are directed to answers. Should we also reconsider our approach? Though yeah, we proportionally have more questions which get answered

    – Rohit
    Jul 26 at 21:03







  • 3





    @Rohit If you think you can make a case for a change in our approach, it's probably worth raising it as a question on our meta site.

    – sempaiscuba
    Jul 26 at 21:11












  • 5





    Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review our site tour and help center, and in particular How to Ask.

    – sempaiscuba
    Jul 26 at 14:42






  • 1





    @sempaiscuba man those guys at AskHistorians take anything and everything as a question. Most of their filters are directed to answers. Should we also reconsider our approach? Though yeah, we proportionally have more questions which get answered

    – Rohit
    Jul 26 at 21:03







  • 3





    @Rohit If you think you can make a case for a change in our approach, it's probably worth raising it as a question on our meta site.

    – sempaiscuba
    Jul 26 at 21:11







5




5





Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review our site tour and help center, and in particular How to Ask.

– sempaiscuba
Jul 26 at 14:42





Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review our site tour and help center, and in particular How to Ask.

– sempaiscuba
Jul 26 at 14:42




1




1





@sempaiscuba man those guys at AskHistorians take anything and everything as a question. Most of their filters are directed to answers. Should we also reconsider our approach? Though yeah, we proportionally have more questions which get answered

– Rohit
Jul 26 at 21:03






@sempaiscuba man those guys at AskHistorians take anything and everything as a question. Most of their filters are directed to answers. Should we also reconsider our approach? Though yeah, we proportionally have more questions which get answered

– Rohit
Jul 26 at 21:03





3




3





@Rohit If you think you can make a case for a change in our approach, it's probably worth raising it as a question on our meta site.

– sempaiscuba
Jul 26 at 21:11





@Rohit If you think you can make a case for a change in our approach, it's probably worth raising it as a question on our meta site.

– sempaiscuba
Jul 26 at 21:11










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















18














Marcus Cassianius Latinius Postumus, murdered in the year 269 CE.




When affairs were in this desperate condition, and the Roman empire
almost ruined, POSTUMUS, a man of very obscure birth, assumed the
purple in Gaul, and held the government with such ability for ten
years, that he recruited the provinces, which had been almost ruined,
by his great energy and judgment; but he was killed in a mutiny of the
army, because he would not deliver up Moguntiacum
, which had
rebelled against him, to be plundered by the soldiers, at the time
when Lucius Aelianus was endeavouring to effect a change of
government.



Eutropius, Abridgment of Roman History, 9.9.1







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    did he he allow his soldiers to plunder a city in a previous conquest?

    – user366312
    Jul 27 at 0:05












  • @user366312 Yes, his first act as Emperor of the Gallic Empire (in 260 CE) was besieging Colonia, where the former emperors, Silvanus and Salonius, were. And he plundered that city. Postumus' emperorship was a continuous string of campaigns to consolidate his unstable position (the Gallic Empire itself was a temporary split of the Roman Empire thanks to the political situation of the Crisis of the Third Century) and he plundered several cities to finance those campaigns. In my opinion, he didn't want to plunder Mainz (the one that cost him his life) because he wanted to make it his capital.

    – Carlos Martin
    Jul 27 at 6:08






  • 2





    His name combined the fact he's remembered (in part) for being killed is just too funny. (Apologies, Marcus, but it's true.)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Jul 27 at 13:17













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f53844%2fwhich-roman-general-was-killed-by-his-own-soldiers-for-not-letting-them-to-loot%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









18














Marcus Cassianius Latinius Postumus, murdered in the year 269 CE.




When affairs were in this desperate condition, and the Roman empire
almost ruined, POSTUMUS, a man of very obscure birth, assumed the
purple in Gaul, and held the government with such ability for ten
years, that he recruited the provinces, which had been almost ruined,
by his great energy and judgment; but he was killed in a mutiny of the
army, because he would not deliver up Moguntiacum
, which had
rebelled against him, to be plundered by the soldiers, at the time
when Lucius Aelianus was endeavouring to effect a change of
government.



Eutropius, Abridgment of Roman History, 9.9.1







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    did he he allow his soldiers to plunder a city in a previous conquest?

    – user366312
    Jul 27 at 0:05












  • @user366312 Yes, his first act as Emperor of the Gallic Empire (in 260 CE) was besieging Colonia, where the former emperors, Silvanus and Salonius, were. And he plundered that city. Postumus' emperorship was a continuous string of campaigns to consolidate his unstable position (the Gallic Empire itself was a temporary split of the Roman Empire thanks to the political situation of the Crisis of the Third Century) and he plundered several cities to finance those campaigns. In my opinion, he didn't want to plunder Mainz (the one that cost him his life) because he wanted to make it his capital.

    – Carlos Martin
    Jul 27 at 6:08






  • 2





    His name combined the fact he's remembered (in part) for being killed is just too funny. (Apologies, Marcus, but it's true.)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Jul 27 at 13:17















18














Marcus Cassianius Latinius Postumus, murdered in the year 269 CE.




When affairs were in this desperate condition, and the Roman empire
almost ruined, POSTUMUS, a man of very obscure birth, assumed the
purple in Gaul, and held the government with such ability for ten
years, that he recruited the provinces, which had been almost ruined,
by his great energy and judgment; but he was killed in a mutiny of the
army, because he would not deliver up Moguntiacum
, which had
rebelled against him, to be plundered by the soldiers, at the time
when Lucius Aelianus was endeavouring to effect a change of
government.



Eutropius, Abridgment of Roman History, 9.9.1







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    did he he allow his soldiers to plunder a city in a previous conquest?

    – user366312
    Jul 27 at 0:05












  • @user366312 Yes, his first act as Emperor of the Gallic Empire (in 260 CE) was besieging Colonia, where the former emperors, Silvanus and Salonius, were. And he plundered that city. Postumus' emperorship was a continuous string of campaigns to consolidate his unstable position (the Gallic Empire itself was a temporary split of the Roman Empire thanks to the political situation of the Crisis of the Third Century) and he plundered several cities to finance those campaigns. In my opinion, he didn't want to plunder Mainz (the one that cost him his life) because he wanted to make it his capital.

    – Carlos Martin
    Jul 27 at 6:08






  • 2





    His name combined the fact he's remembered (in part) for being killed is just too funny. (Apologies, Marcus, but it's true.)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Jul 27 at 13:17













18












18








18







Marcus Cassianius Latinius Postumus, murdered in the year 269 CE.




When affairs were in this desperate condition, and the Roman empire
almost ruined, POSTUMUS, a man of very obscure birth, assumed the
purple in Gaul, and held the government with such ability for ten
years, that he recruited the provinces, which had been almost ruined,
by his great energy and judgment; but he was killed in a mutiny of the
army, because he would not deliver up Moguntiacum
, which had
rebelled against him, to be plundered by the soldiers, at the time
when Lucius Aelianus was endeavouring to effect a change of
government.



Eutropius, Abridgment of Roman History, 9.9.1







share|improve this answer













Marcus Cassianius Latinius Postumus, murdered in the year 269 CE.




When affairs were in this desperate condition, and the Roman empire
almost ruined, POSTUMUS, a man of very obscure birth, assumed the
purple in Gaul, and held the government with such ability for ten
years, that he recruited the provinces, which had been almost ruined,
by his great energy and judgment; but he was killed in a mutiny of the
army, because he would not deliver up Moguntiacum
, which had
rebelled against him, to be plundered by the soldiers, at the time
when Lucius Aelianus was endeavouring to effect a change of
government.



Eutropius, Abridgment of Roman History, 9.9.1








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jul 26 at 16:58









Carlos MartinCarlos Martin

2931 silver badge3 bronze badges




2931 silver badge3 bronze badges










  • 1





    did he he allow his soldiers to plunder a city in a previous conquest?

    – user366312
    Jul 27 at 0:05












  • @user366312 Yes, his first act as Emperor of the Gallic Empire (in 260 CE) was besieging Colonia, where the former emperors, Silvanus and Salonius, were. And he plundered that city. Postumus' emperorship was a continuous string of campaigns to consolidate his unstable position (the Gallic Empire itself was a temporary split of the Roman Empire thanks to the political situation of the Crisis of the Third Century) and he plundered several cities to finance those campaigns. In my opinion, he didn't want to plunder Mainz (the one that cost him his life) because he wanted to make it his capital.

    – Carlos Martin
    Jul 27 at 6:08






  • 2





    His name combined the fact he's remembered (in part) for being killed is just too funny. (Apologies, Marcus, but it's true.)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Jul 27 at 13:17












  • 1





    did he he allow his soldiers to plunder a city in a previous conquest?

    – user366312
    Jul 27 at 0:05












  • @user366312 Yes, his first act as Emperor of the Gallic Empire (in 260 CE) was besieging Colonia, where the former emperors, Silvanus and Salonius, were. And he plundered that city. Postumus' emperorship was a continuous string of campaigns to consolidate his unstable position (the Gallic Empire itself was a temporary split of the Roman Empire thanks to the political situation of the Crisis of the Third Century) and he plundered several cities to finance those campaigns. In my opinion, he didn't want to plunder Mainz (the one that cost him his life) because he wanted to make it his capital.

    – Carlos Martin
    Jul 27 at 6:08






  • 2





    His name combined the fact he's remembered (in part) for being killed is just too funny. (Apologies, Marcus, but it's true.)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Jul 27 at 13:17







1




1





did he he allow his soldiers to plunder a city in a previous conquest?

– user366312
Jul 27 at 0:05






did he he allow his soldiers to plunder a city in a previous conquest?

– user366312
Jul 27 at 0:05














@user366312 Yes, his first act as Emperor of the Gallic Empire (in 260 CE) was besieging Colonia, where the former emperors, Silvanus and Salonius, were. And he plundered that city. Postumus' emperorship was a continuous string of campaigns to consolidate his unstable position (the Gallic Empire itself was a temporary split of the Roman Empire thanks to the political situation of the Crisis of the Third Century) and he plundered several cities to finance those campaigns. In my opinion, he didn't want to plunder Mainz (the one that cost him his life) because he wanted to make it his capital.

– Carlos Martin
Jul 27 at 6:08





@user366312 Yes, his first act as Emperor of the Gallic Empire (in 260 CE) was besieging Colonia, where the former emperors, Silvanus and Salonius, were. And he plundered that city. Postumus' emperorship was a continuous string of campaigns to consolidate his unstable position (the Gallic Empire itself was a temporary split of the Roman Empire thanks to the political situation of the Crisis of the Third Century) and he plundered several cities to finance those campaigns. In my opinion, he didn't want to plunder Mainz (the one that cost him his life) because he wanted to make it his capital.

– Carlos Martin
Jul 27 at 6:08




2




2





His name combined the fact he's remembered (in part) for being killed is just too funny. (Apologies, Marcus, but it's true.)

– T.J. Crowder
Jul 27 at 13:17





His name combined the fact he's remembered (in part) for being killed is just too funny. (Apologies, Marcus, but it's true.)

– T.J. Crowder
Jul 27 at 13:17

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f53844%2fwhich-roman-general-was-killed-by-his-own-soldiers-for-not-letting-them-to-loot%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?