Why are MEMS in QFN packages?ARM controllers in small packagesWhy are SMD Diodes different Packages than Resistors and Capacitors?Why is there copper on the side of this package?Limits of dead reckoning using MEMS sensorsWhy no octagonal IC packages?Why do some voltage reference ICs (LM385B) have 8 pin packages where 6 pins are NC?Why do single op-amp DIP packages have 8 pins, rather than 6?Cost effect of different component packages during PCB assemblyWhy are accelerometers (and other MEMS devices) so rarely integrated into components?Replacement of MEMS gyroscope with better less noise devices
Why adjustbox needs a tweak of raise=-0.3ex with enumitem?
What is Albrecht Dürer's Perspective Machine drawing style?
coding the arrow's path in flowchart
Does the problem of P vs NP come under the category of Operational Research?
A verb for when some rights are not violated?
Astable 555 circuit not oscillating
What is the most 'environmentally friendly' way to learn to fly?
Is there any difference between "result in" and "end up with"?
Is there a general term for the items in a directory?
How to win an all out war against ants
Why do my fried eggs start browning very fast?
How to call made-up data?
Who's behind community AMIs on Amazon EC2?
Why does Shift-right says it is bound to right?
How was the cosmonaut of the Soviet moon mission supposed to get back in the return vehicle?
What is it exactly about flying a Flyboard across the English channel that made Zapata's thighs burn?
In-Cabinet (sink base) electrical box - Metal or Plastic?
Went to a big 4 but got fired for underperformance in a year recently - Now every one thinks I'm pro - How to balance expectations?
Is this popular optical illusion made of a grey-scale image with coloured lines?
In a KP-K endgame, if the enemy king is in front of the pawn, is it always a draw?
Declaring a visitor to the UK as my "girlfriend" - effect on getting a Visitor visa?
How long should I wait to plug in my refrigerator after unplugging it?
Generate random number in Unity without class ambiguity
Hook/Clasp/Latch? (For a necklace)
Why are MEMS in QFN packages?
ARM controllers in small packagesWhy are SMD Diodes different Packages than Resistors and Capacitors?Why is there copper on the side of this package?Limits of dead reckoning using MEMS sensorsWhy no octagonal IC packages?Why do some voltage reference ICs (LM385B) have 8 pin packages where 6 pins are NC?Why do single op-amp DIP packages have 8 pins, rather than 6?Cost effect of different component packages during PCB assemblyWhy are accelerometers (and other MEMS devices) so rarely integrated into components?Replacement of MEMS gyroscope with better less noise devices
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I've seen that many (if not all of them) MEMS, like accelerometers, they are only available in QFN packages.
Why is that?
packages mems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've seen that many (if not all of them) MEMS, like accelerometers, they are only available in QFN packages.
Why is that?
packages mems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've seen that many (if not all of them) MEMS, like accelerometers, they are only available in QFN packages.
Why is that?
packages mems
$endgroup$
I've seen that many (if not all of them) MEMS, like accelerometers, they are only available in QFN packages.
Why is that?
packages mems
packages mems
asked Jul 24 at 11:52
MrBitMrBit
6262 gold badges10 silver badges27 bronze badges
6262 gold badges10 silver badges27 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Simply because: what else would you want to use?
- Chip-scale packages are typically out: MEMS devices typically need reliable enclosure; a layer of lacquer typically doesn't work.
- flip-chip BGA plastic packages minimize area of contacting (if you can't do chip-scale), but that's often not technically viable due to the MEMS structures being exactly where the balls would end up
- QFN is small enough for most applications, and cheap.
- Anything larger is undesirable because a) larger than necessary without being any easier to work with and b) more expensive, even if only for economics of scale: the very vast majority of MEMS applications will prefer the QFN package, so the other packaging option induce a higher per-device packaging cost.
- EEs will prefer packages they're used to work with – QFN is among these, and one of the, if not the, easiest to solder correctly IC package.
- Leaded packages are unattractive for applications that are subject to vibrations and the like, which is exactly where a lot of accelerometers are used.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
QFN being one of the easiest packages to solder doesn't line up with my experience, but that experience is entirely soldering by hand, so perhaps they're just easy to reflow.
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 14:18
2
$begingroup$
I found them pretty easy to solder with paste & heat gun, given you get your pads separated – solder mask in between pads works surprisingly well, if you don't have a stencil.
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:00
1
$begingroup$
try with a really small amount of paste!
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
I've not used paste before, just solder wire, which may explain why I've found QFNs so difficult!
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
Oh, it's absolutely a non-starter these days, but DIP was really easy to manage by hand. I've done QFN, but I'll definitely say that QFP is easier to do by hand, at least without professional-level equipment.
$endgroup$
– chrylis
Jul 25 at 9:49
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
It is not true that they are only in QFN enclosures. Look, for example, to the Farnell website and see how many types of package there are:
https://pl.farnell.com/c/polprzewodniki-uklady-scalone/czujnikowe-uklady-scalone/moduly-mems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f449902%2fwhy-are-mems-in-qfn-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Simply because: what else would you want to use?
- Chip-scale packages are typically out: MEMS devices typically need reliable enclosure; a layer of lacquer typically doesn't work.
- flip-chip BGA plastic packages minimize area of contacting (if you can't do chip-scale), but that's often not technically viable due to the MEMS structures being exactly where the balls would end up
- QFN is small enough for most applications, and cheap.
- Anything larger is undesirable because a) larger than necessary without being any easier to work with and b) more expensive, even if only for economics of scale: the very vast majority of MEMS applications will prefer the QFN package, so the other packaging option induce a higher per-device packaging cost.
- EEs will prefer packages they're used to work with – QFN is among these, and one of the, if not the, easiest to solder correctly IC package.
- Leaded packages are unattractive for applications that are subject to vibrations and the like, which is exactly where a lot of accelerometers are used.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
QFN being one of the easiest packages to solder doesn't line up with my experience, but that experience is entirely soldering by hand, so perhaps they're just easy to reflow.
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 14:18
2
$begingroup$
I found them pretty easy to solder with paste & heat gun, given you get your pads separated – solder mask in between pads works surprisingly well, if you don't have a stencil.
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:00
1
$begingroup$
try with a really small amount of paste!
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
I've not used paste before, just solder wire, which may explain why I've found QFNs so difficult!
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
Oh, it's absolutely a non-starter these days, but DIP was really easy to manage by hand. I've done QFN, but I'll definitely say that QFP is easier to do by hand, at least without professional-level equipment.
$endgroup$
– chrylis
Jul 25 at 9:49
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Simply because: what else would you want to use?
- Chip-scale packages are typically out: MEMS devices typically need reliable enclosure; a layer of lacquer typically doesn't work.
- flip-chip BGA plastic packages minimize area of contacting (if you can't do chip-scale), but that's often not technically viable due to the MEMS structures being exactly where the balls would end up
- QFN is small enough for most applications, and cheap.
- Anything larger is undesirable because a) larger than necessary without being any easier to work with and b) more expensive, even if only for economics of scale: the very vast majority of MEMS applications will prefer the QFN package, so the other packaging option induce a higher per-device packaging cost.
- EEs will prefer packages they're used to work with – QFN is among these, and one of the, if not the, easiest to solder correctly IC package.
- Leaded packages are unattractive for applications that are subject to vibrations and the like, which is exactly where a lot of accelerometers are used.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
QFN being one of the easiest packages to solder doesn't line up with my experience, but that experience is entirely soldering by hand, so perhaps they're just easy to reflow.
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 14:18
2
$begingroup$
I found them pretty easy to solder with paste & heat gun, given you get your pads separated – solder mask in between pads works surprisingly well, if you don't have a stencil.
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:00
1
$begingroup$
try with a really small amount of paste!
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
I've not used paste before, just solder wire, which may explain why I've found QFNs so difficult!
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
Oh, it's absolutely a non-starter these days, but DIP was really easy to manage by hand. I've done QFN, but I'll definitely say that QFP is easier to do by hand, at least without professional-level equipment.
$endgroup$
– chrylis
Jul 25 at 9:49
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Simply because: what else would you want to use?
- Chip-scale packages are typically out: MEMS devices typically need reliable enclosure; a layer of lacquer typically doesn't work.
- flip-chip BGA plastic packages minimize area of contacting (if you can't do chip-scale), but that's often not technically viable due to the MEMS structures being exactly where the balls would end up
- QFN is small enough for most applications, and cheap.
- Anything larger is undesirable because a) larger than necessary without being any easier to work with and b) more expensive, even if only for economics of scale: the very vast majority of MEMS applications will prefer the QFN package, so the other packaging option induce a higher per-device packaging cost.
- EEs will prefer packages they're used to work with – QFN is among these, and one of the, if not the, easiest to solder correctly IC package.
- Leaded packages are unattractive for applications that are subject to vibrations and the like, which is exactly where a lot of accelerometers are used.
$endgroup$
Simply because: what else would you want to use?
- Chip-scale packages are typically out: MEMS devices typically need reliable enclosure; a layer of lacquer typically doesn't work.
- flip-chip BGA plastic packages minimize area of contacting (if you can't do chip-scale), but that's often not technically viable due to the MEMS structures being exactly where the balls would end up
- QFN is small enough for most applications, and cheap.
- Anything larger is undesirable because a) larger than necessary without being any easier to work with and b) more expensive, even if only for economics of scale: the very vast majority of MEMS applications will prefer the QFN package, so the other packaging option induce a higher per-device packaging cost.
- EEs will prefer packages they're used to work with – QFN is among these, and one of the, if not the, easiest to solder correctly IC package.
- Leaded packages are unattractive for applications that are subject to vibrations and the like, which is exactly where a lot of accelerometers are used.
answered Jul 24 at 12:04
Marcus MüllerMarcus Müller
39.5k3 gold badges66 silver badges107 bronze badges
39.5k3 gold badges66 silver badges107 bronze badges
3
$begingroup$
QFN being one of the easiest packages to solder doesn't line up with my experience, but that experience is entirely soldering by hand, so perhaps they're just easy to reflow.
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 14:18
2
$begingroup$
I found them pretty easy to solder with paste & heat gun, given you get your pads separated – solder mask in between pads works surprisingly well, if you don't have a stencil.
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:00
1
$begingroup$
try with a really small amount of paste!
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
I've not used paste before, just solder wire, which may explain why I've found QFNs so difficult!
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
Oh, it's absolutely a non-starter these days, but DIP was really easy to manage by hand. I've done QFN, but I'll definitely say that QFP is easier to do by hand, at least without professional-level equipment.
$endgroup$
– chrylis
Jul 25 at 9:49
|
show 3 more comments
3
$begingroup$
QFN being one of the easiest packages to solder doesn't line up with my experience, but that experience is entirely soldering by hand, so perhaps they're just easy to reflow.
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 14:18
2
$begingroup$
I found them pretty easy to solder with paste & heat gun, given you get your pads separated – solder mask in between pads works surprisingly well, if you don't have a stencil.
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:00
1
$begingroup$
try with a really small amount of paste!
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
I've not used paste before, just solder wire, which may explain why I've found QFNs so difficult!
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
$begingroup$
Oh, it's absolutely a non-starter these days, but DIP was really easy to manage by hand. I've done QFN, but I'll definitely say that QFP is easier to do by hand, at least without professional-level equipment.
$endgroup$
– chrylis
Jul 25 at 9:49
3
3
$begingroup$
QFN being one of the easiest packages to solder doesn't line up with my experience, but that experience is entirely soldering by hand, so perhaps they're just easy to reflow.
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 14:18
$begingroup$
QFN being one of the easiest packages to solder doesn't line up with my experience, but that experience is entirely soldering by hand, so perhaps they're just easy to reflow.
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 14:18
2
2
$begingroup$
I found them pretty easy to solder with paste & heat gun, given you get your pads separated – solder mask in between pads works surprisingly well, if you don't have a stencil.
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:00
$begingroup$
I found them pretty easy to solder with paste & heat gun, given you get your pads separated – solder mask in between pads works surprisingly well, if you don't have a stencil.
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:00
1
1
$begingroup$
try with a really small amount of paste!
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:18
$begingroup$
try with a really small amount of paste!
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
1
$begingroup$
I've not used paste before, just solder wire, which may explain why I've found QFNs so difficult!
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 15:18
$begingroup$
I've not used paste before, just solder wire, which may explain why I've found QFNs so difficult!
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Jul 24 at 15:18
1
1
$begingroup$
Oh, it's absolutely a non-starter these days, but DIP was really easy to manage by hand. I've done QFN, but I'll definitely say that QFP is easier to do by hand, at least without professional-level equipment.
$endgroup$
– chrylis
Jul 25 at 9:49
$begingroup$
Oh, it's absolutely a non-starter these days, but DIP was really easy to manage by hand. I've done QFN, but I'll definitely say that QFP is easier to do by hand, at least without professional-level equipment.
$endgroup$
– chrylis
Jul 25 at 9:49
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
It is not true that they are only in QFN enclosures. Look, for example, to the Farnell website and see how many types of package there are:
https://pl.farnell.com/c/polprzewodniki-uklady-scalone/czujnikowe-uklady-scalone/moduly-mems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is not true that they are only in QFN enclosures. Look, for example, to the Farnell website and see how many types of package there are:
https://pl.farnell.com/c/polprzewodniki-uklady-scalone/czujnikowe-uklady-scalone/moduly-mems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is not true that they are only in QFN enclosures. Look, for example, to the Farnell website and see how many types of package there are:
https://pl.farnell.com/c/polprzewodniki-uklady-scalone/czujnikowe-uklady-scalone/moduly-mems
$endgroup$
It is not true that they are only in QFN enclosures. Look, for example, to the Farnell website and see how many types of package there are:
https://pl.farnell.com/c/polprzewodniki-uklady-scalone/czujnikowe-uklady-scalone/moduly-mems
answered Jul 24 at 12:07
sigarissigaris
1251 gold badge1 silver badge6 bronze badges
1251 gold badge1 silver badge6 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f449902%2fwhy-are-mems-in-qfn-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown