Fractional alignment The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Incommath and ifinnerHow to keep alignment consistent with non-LaTeX contents?Suggestions for splitting a large fractional equation?Nicer alignment of x^*/2How to change horizontal alignment of frac?How to change horizontal alignment for frac?Display fractional formula nicelyFormatting a fractional exponent in display mathUsing braces with equations - how to make fractional terms 'bigger'Alignment of fractions of the form (a-b)/(c-d)Equation alignment between columns

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

What is the closest word meaning "respect for time / mindful"

Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT

Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

slides for 30min~1hr skype tenure track application interview

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Did Section 31 appear in Star Trek: The Next Generation?

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

How to check whether the reindex working or not in Magento?

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Output the Arecibo Message

Why is the Constellation's nose gear so long?

Interpreting the 2019 New York Reproductive Health Act?

Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?



Fractional alignment



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Incommath and ifinnerHow to keep alignment consistent with non-LaTeX contents?Suggestions for splitting a large fractional equation?Nicer alignment of x^*/2How to change horizontal alignment of frac?How to change horizontal alignment for frac?Display fractional formula nicelyFormatting a fractional exponent in display mathUsing braces with equations - how to make fractional terms 'bigger'Alignment of fractions of the form (a-b)/(c-d)Equation alignment between columns










8















So I have this basic code:



But the fractional alignment looks awful, any tips to fix this?



documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
usepackagebm
usepackageamsfonts, graphicx, verbatim, amsmath,amssymb, amsthm, mathrsfs, eufrak
usepackagecolor
usepackagearray
usepackagesetspace% if you must (for double spacing thesis)
usepackagefancyhdr
usepackageenumitem
usepackagetikz
usepackageparskip
usepackagelipsum
usepackagefloatrow
usepackagecommath
providecommandU[1]protectrule.1in.1in


begindocument

Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
[
h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
]
where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity, the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
endenumerate

enddocument


as you notice, it looks awful.










share|improve this question
























  • I mean, can the |G| be pushed a little to the right? since the vertical "bars" and not aligned with the horizontal fractional line?

    – Maths
    yesterday







  • 1





    You can always add space to it: ,abs G.

    – JouleV
    yesterday






  • 1





    Hmm, I don't think it deserves closure. This is a good question and my solution is only a workaround - it is not 100% centered. Maybe some TeXperts out there will provide a good answer.

    – JouleV
    yesterday






  • 1





    @JouleV I agree, the question shouldn't be closed. It's definitely a bug (feature?) in commath.

    – campa
    yesterday







  • 1





    See tex.stackexchange.com/a/135985/4427, if you really want to use commath macros.

    – egreg
    yesterday















8















So I have this basic code:



But the fractional alignment looks awful, any tips to fix this?



documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
usepackagebm
usepackageamsfonts, graphicx, verbatim, amsmath,amssymb, amsthm, mathrsfs, eufrak
usepackagecolor
usepackagearray
usepackagesetspace% if you must (for double spacing thesis)
usepackagefancyhdr
usepackageenumitem
usepackagetikz
usepackageparskip
usepackagelipsum
usepackagefloatrow
usepackagecommath
providecommandU[1]protectrule.1in.1in


begindocument

Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
[
h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
]
where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity, the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
endenumerate

enddocument


as you notice, it looks awful.










share|improve this question
























  • I mean, can the |G| be pushed a little to the right? since the vertical "bars" and not aligned with the horizontal fractional line?

    – Maths
    yesterday







  • 1





    You can always add space to it: ,abs G.

    – JouleV
    yesterday






  • 1





    Hmm, I don't think it deserves closure. This is a good question and my solution is only a workaround - it is not 100% centered. Maybe some TeXperts out there will provide a good answer.

    – JouleV
    yesterday






  • 1





    @JouleV I agree, the question shouldn't be closed. It's definitely a bug (feature?) in commath.

    – campa
    yesterday







  • 1





    See tex.stackexchange.com/a/135985/4427, if you really want to use commath macros.

    – egreg
    yesterday













8












8








8


1






So I have this basic code:



But the fractional alignment looks awful, any tips to fix this?



documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
usepackagebm
usepackageamsfonts, graphicx, verbatim, amsmath,amssymb, amsthm, mathrsfs, eufrak
usepackagecolor
usepackagearray
usepackagesetspace% if you must (for double spacing thesis)
usepackagefancyhdr
usepackageenumitem
usepackagetikz
usepackageparskip
usepackagelipsum
usepackagefloatrow
usepackagecommath
providecommandU[1]protectrule.1in.1in


begindocument

Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
[
h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
]
where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity, the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
endenumerate

enddocument


as you notice, it looks awful.










share|improve this question
















So I have this basic code:



But the fractional alignment looks awful, any tips to fix this?



documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
usepackagebm
usepackageamsfonts, graphicx, verbatim, amsmath,amssymb, amsthm, mathrsfs, eufrak
usepackagecolor
usepackagearray
usepackagesetspace% if you must (for double spacing thesis)
usepackagefancyhdr
usepackageenumitem
usepackagetikz
usepackageparskip
usepackagelipsum
usepackagefloatrow
usepackagecommath
providecommandU[1]protectrule.1in.1in


begindocument

Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
[
h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
]
where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity, the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
endenumerate

enddocument


as you notice, it looks awful.







fractions commath






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Mico

286k32390779




286k32390779










asked yesterday









MathsMaths

44311




44311












  • I mean, can the |G| be pushed a little to the right? since the vertical "bars" and not aligned with the horizontal fractional line?

    – Maths
    yesterday







  • 1





    You can always add space to it: ,abs G.

    – JouleV
    yesterday






  • 1





    Hmm, I don't think it deserves closure. This is a good question and my solution is only a workaround - it is not 100% centered. Maybe some TeXperts out there will provide a good answer.

    – JouleV
    yesterday






  • 1





    @JouleV I agree, the question shouldn't be closed. It's definitely a bug (feature?) in commath.

    – campa
    yesterday







  • 1





    See tex.stackexchange.com/a/135985/4427, if you really want to use commath macros.

    – egreg
    yesterday

















  • I mean, can the |G| be pushed a little to the right? since the vertical "bars" and not aligned with the horizontal fractional line?

    – Maths
    yesterday







  • 1





    You can always add space to it: ,abs G.

    – JouleV
    yesterday






  • 1





    Hmm, I don't think it deserves closure. This is a good question and my solution is only a workaround - it is not 100% centered. Maybe some TeXperts out there will provide a good answer.

    – JouleV
    yesterday






  • 1





    @JouleV I agree, the question shouldn't be closed. It's definitely a bug (feature?) in commath.

    – campa
    yesterday







  • 1





    See tex.stackexchange.com/a/135985/4427, if you really want to use commath macros.

    – egreg
    yesterday
















I mean, can the |G| be pushed a little to the right? since the vertical "bars" and not aligned with the horizontal fractional line?

– Maths
yesterday






I mean, can the |G| be pushed a little to the right? since the vertical "bars" and not aligned with the horizontal fractional line?

– Maths
yesterday





1




1





You can always add space to it: ,abs G.

– JouleV
yesterday





You can always add space to it: ,abs G.

– JouleV
yesterday




1




1





Hmm, I don't think it deserves closure. This is a good question and my solution is only a workaround - it is not 100% centered. Maybe some TeXperts out there will provide a good answer.

– JouleV
yesterday





Hmm, I don't think it deserves closure. This is a good question and my solution is only a workaround - it is not 100% centered. Maybe some TeXperts out there will provide a good answer.

– JouleV
yesterday




1




1





@JouleV I agree, the question shouldn't be closed. It's definitely a bug (feature?) in commath.

– campa
yesterday






@JouleV I agree, the question shouldn't be closed. It's definitely a bug (feature?) in commath.

– campa
yesterday





1




1





See tex.stackexchange.com/a/135985/4427, if you really want to use commath macros.

– egreg
yesterday





See tex.stackexchange.com/a/135985/4427, if you really want to use commath macros.

– egreg
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8














The commath package provides a highly questionable implementation of abs. Don't load this package unless you absolutely have to. (Aside: You do not have to for the example at hand.)



Instead of loading this package, I suggest you



  • load the mathtools package instead of the amsmath package. The mathtools package is, for all intents and purposes, a superset of the amsmath package; and



  • issue the instruction



    DeclarePairedDelimiterabslvertrvert


    in the preamble. This sets up a proper implementation of abs.... If you need to auto-size the vertical bars, simply use abs*....




*Addendum": More about how commath implements envert (abs is just an alias for envert): If envert<arg> is invoked without an optional sizing argument (a whole number between 0 and 4), the following code gets executed:



 !leftlvert#2rightrvert


It's the ! ("negative thinspace") instruction that messes up the symmetry of the full expression. Either write abs[0]<arg> to execute lvert#2rvert or, more safely, don't load commath at all and go for a cleaner definition of abs. The definitions of abs[1]... thru abs[4]... are also messed up, by the way, as are the definitions of norm and norm[1] thru norm]4]. While it's possible, in principle, to correct the faulty definitions of envert, abs, enVert, and norm, one is better off going for a setup that avoids these complications...






share|improve this answer

























  • So I should remove the amsath package and insert the mathtools package? would this affect the remaining document consisting of 40-50 pages? if not then I'll change it since you have much more experience.

    – Maths
    yesterday







  • 1





    @Maths - The mathtools package automatically loads the amsmath package, while taking great care not to mess with the operational details of the macros.

    – Mico
    yesterday


















1














Compare the output of



documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
usepackageamsmath
usepackageenumitem
usepackagecommath

DeclareMathOperatorTrTr

begindocument

Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
[
h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
]
where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity,
the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
endenumerate

enddocument


enter image description here



with the output of



documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
usepackageamsmath
usepackageenumitem

makeatletter
% begin definitions for a "better commath"

newcommanddifmathop!mathrmd
newcommandDifmathop!mathrmD

newcommandspx[1]%
ifrelaxdetokenize#1relax
expandafter@gobble
else
expandafter@firstofone
fi
^#1%


newcommandpd[3][]fracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1
newcommandtpd[3][]tfracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1
newcommanddpd[3][]dfracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1

newcommandmd[6]fracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6
newcommandtmd[6]tfracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6
newcommanddmd[6]dfracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6

newcommandod[3][]fracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1
newcommandtod[3][]tfracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1
newcommanddod[3][]dfracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1

newcommandgenericdel[4]%
ifcase#3relax
ifx#1.else#1fi#4ifx#2.else#2fior
bigl#1#4bigr#2or
Bigl#1#4Bigr#2or
biggl#1#4biggr#2or
Biggl#1#4Biggr#2else
left#1#4right#2fi

newcommanddel[2][-1]genericdel()#1#2
newcommandset[2][-1]genericdel#1#2
letcbrset
newcommandsbr[2][-1]genericdel[]#1#2
letintoodel
letintccsbr
newcommandintoc[2][-1]genericdel(]#1#2
newcommandintco[2][-1]genericdel[)#1#2
newcommandeval[2][-1]#1#2
newcommandenvert[2][-1]#1#2
letabsenvert
newcommandsVert[1][0]orbiggr
newcommandenVert[2][-1]#1#2
letnormenVert
newcommandfullfunction[5]%
beginarray@r@r@c@l@
#1 colon & #2 & longrightarrow & #3 \
& #4 & longmapsto & #5
endarray

%%% end of the definitions
makeatother


DeclareMathOperatorTrTr

begindocument

Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
[
h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
]
where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity,
the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
endenumerate

enddocument


The code has already been presented in https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/135985/4427 and provides a full replacement of commath, avoiding all its weaknesses. If you're tied to commath because you use its macros and features in other places, this can save you. Otherwise define abs with DeclarePairedDelimiter as suggested by Mico.



For instance, you can notice the reduced space between “where” and “|G|” in the commath version.



enter image description here



You should define anyway an operator name for “Tr”.



If you decide to go for this, save the part between



% begin definitions for a "better commath"


and



% end of the definitions


in a file called bettercommath.sty in the working directory and do usepackagebettercommath.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483944%2ffractional-alignment%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    The commath package provides a highly questionable implementation of abs. Don't load this package unless you absolutely have to. (Aside: You do not have to for the example at hand.)



    Instead of loading this package, I suggest you



    • load the mathtools package instead of the amsmath package. The mathtools package is, for all intents and purposes, a superset of the amsmath package; and



    • issue the instruction



      DeclarePairedDelimiterabslvertrvert


      in the preamble. This sets up a proper implementation of abs.... If you need to auto-size the vertical bars, simply use abs*....




    *Addendum": More about how commath implements envert (abs is just an alias for envert): If envert<arg> is invoked without an optional sizing argument (a whole number between 0 and 4), the following code gets executed:



     !leftlvert#2rightrvert


    It's the ! ("negative thinspace") instruction that messes up the symmetry of the full expression. Either write abs[0]<arg> to execute lvert#2rvert or, more safely, don't load commath at all and go for a cleaner definition of abs. The definitions of abs[1]... thru abs[4]... are also messed up, by the way, as are the definitions of norm and norm[1] thru norm]4]. While it's possible, in principle, to correct the faulty definitions of envert, abs, enVert, and norm, one is better off going for a setup that avoids these complications...






    share|improve this answer

























    • So I should remove the amsath package and insert the mathtools package? would this affect the remaining document consisting of 40-50 pages? if not then I'll change it since you have much more experience.

      – Maths
      yesterday







    • 1





      @Maths - The mathtools package automatically loads the amsmath package, while taking great care not to mess with the operational details of the macros.

      – Mico
      yesterday















    8














    The commath package provides a highly questionable implementation of abs. Don't load this package unless you absolutely have to. (Aside: You do not have to for the example at hand.)



    Instead of loading this package, I suggest you



    • load the mathtools package instead of the amsmath package. The mathtools package is, for all intents and purposes, a superset of the amsmath package; and



    • issue the instruction



      DeclarePairedDelimiterabslvertrvert


      in the preamble. This sets up a proper implementation of abs.... If you need to auto-size the vertical bars, simply use abs*....




    *Addendum": More about how commath implements envert (abs is just an alias for envert): If envert<arg> is invoked without an optional sizing argument (a whole number between 0 and 4), the following code gets executed:



     !leftlvert#2rightrvert


    It's the ! ("negative thinspace") instruction that messes up the symmetry of the full expression. Either write abs[0]<arg> to execute lvert#2rvert or, more safely, don't load commath at all and go for a cleaner definition of abs. The definitions of abs[1]... thru abs[4]... are also messed up, by the way, as are the definitions of norm and norm[1] thru norm]4]. While it's possible, in principle, to correct the faulty definitions of envert, abs, enVert, and norm, one is better off going for a setup that avoids these complications...






    share|improve this answer

























    • So I should remove the amsath package and insert the mathtools package? would this affect the remaining document consisting of 40-50 pages? if not then I'll change it since you have much more experience.

      – Maths
      yesterday







    • 1





      @Maths - The mathtools package automatically loads the amsmath package, while taking great care not to mess with the operational details of the macros.

      – Mico
      yesterday













    8












    8








    8







    The commath package provides a highly questionable implementation of abs. Don't load this package unless you absolutely have to. (Aside: You do not have to for the example at hand.)



    Instead of loading this package, I suggest you



    • load the mathtools package instead of the amsmath package. The mathtools package is, for all intents and purposes, a superset of the amsmath package; and



    • issue the instruction



      DeclarePairedDelimiterabslvertrvert


      in the preamble. This sets up a proper implementation of abs.... If you need to auto-size the vertical bars, simply use abs*....




    *Addendum": More about how commath implements envert (abs is just an alias for envert): If envert<arg> is invoked without an optional sizing argument (a whole number between 0 and 4), the following code gets executed:



     !leftlvert#2rightrvert


    It's the ! ("negative thinspace") instruction that messes up the symmetry of the full expression. Either write abs[0]<arg> to execute lvert#2rvert or, more safely, don't load commath at all and go for a cleaner definition of abs. The definitions of abs[1]... thru abs[4]... are also messed up, by the way, as are the definitions of norm and norm[1] thru norm]4]. While it's possible, in principle, to correct the faulty definitions of envert, abs, enVert, and norm, one is better off going for a setup that avoids these complications...






    share|improve this answer















    The commath package provides a highly questionable implementation of abs. Don't load this package unless you absolutely have to. (Aside: You do not have to for the example at hand.)



    Instead of loading this package, I suggest you



    • load the mathtools package instead of the amsmath package. The mathtools package is, for all intents and purposes, a superset of the amsmath package; and



    • issue the instruction



      DeclarePairedDelimiterabslvertrvert


      in the preamble. This sets up a proper implementation of abs.... If you need to auto-size the vertical bars, simply use abs*....




    *Addendum": More about how commath implements envert (abs is just an alias for envert): If envert<arg> is invoked without an optional sizing argument (a whole number between 0 and 4), the following code gets executed:



     !leftlvert#2rightrvert


    It's the ! ("negative thinspace") instruction that messes up the symmetry of the full expression. Either write abs[0]<arg> to execute lvert#2rvert or, more safely, don't load commath at all and go for a cleaner definition of abs. The definitions of abs[1]... thru abs[4]... are also messed up, by the way, as are the definitions of norm and norm[1] thru norm]4]. While it's possible, in principle, to correct the faulty definitions of envert, abs, enVert, and norm, one is better off going for a setup that avoids these complications...







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    MicoMico

    286k32390779




    286k32390779












    • So I should remove the amsath package and insert the mathtools package? would this affect the remaining document consisting of 40-50 pages? if not then I'll change it since you have much more experience.

      – Maths
      yesterday







    • 1





      @Maths - The mathtools package automatically loads the amsmath package, while taking great care not to mess with the operational details of the macros.

      – Mico
      yesterday

















    • So I should remove the amsath package and insert the mathtools package? would this affect the remaining document consisting of 40-50 pages? if not then I'll change it since you have much more experience.

      – Maths
      yesterday







    • 1





      @Maths - The mathtools package automatically loads the amsmath package, while taking great care not to mess with the operational details of the macros.

      – Mico
      yesterday
















    So I should remove the amsath package and insert the mathtools package? would this affect the remaining document consisting of 40-50 pages? if not then I'll change it since you have much more experience.

    – Maths
    yesterday






    So I should remove the amsath package and insert the mathtools package? would this affect the remaining document consisting of 40-50 pages? if not then I'll change it since you have much more experience.

    – Maths
    yesterday





    1




    1





    @Maths - The mathtools package automatically loads the amsmath package, while taking great care not to mess with the operational details of the macros.

    – Mico
    yesterday





    @Maths - The mathtools package automatically loads the amsmath package, while taking great care not to mess with the operational details of the macros.

    – Mico
    yesterday











    1














    Compare the output of



    documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackageenumitem
    usepackagecommath

    DeclareMathOperatorTrTr

    begindocument

    Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
    [
    h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
    ]
    where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
    beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
    item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
    item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity,
    the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
    endenumerate

    enddocument


    enter image description here



    with the output of



    documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackageenumitem

    makeatletter
    % begin definitions for a "better commath"

    newcommanddifmathop!mathrmd
    newcommandDifmathop!mathrmD

    newcommandspx[1]%
    ifrelaxdetokenize#1relax
    expandafter@gobble
    else
    expandafter@firstofone
    fi
    ^#1%


    newcommandpd[3][]fracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1
    newcommandtpd[3][]tfracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1
    newcommanddpd[3][]dfracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1

    newcommandmd[6]fracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6
    newcommandtmd[6]tfracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6
    newcommanddmd[6]dfracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6

    newcommandod[3][]fracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1
    newcommandtod[3][]tfracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1
    newcommanddod[3][]dfracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1

    newcommandgenericdel[4]%
    ifcase#3relax
    ifx#1.else#1fi#4ifx#2.else#2fior
    bigl#1#4bigr#2or
    Bigl#1#4Bigr#2or
    biggl#1#4biggr#2or
    Biggl#1#4Biggr#2else
    left#1#4right#2fi

    newcommanddel[2][-1]genericdel()#1#2
    newcommandset[2][-1]genericdel#1#2
    letcbrset
    newcommandsbr[2][-1]genericdel[]#1#2
    letintoodel
    letintccsbr
    newcommandintoc[2][-1]genericdel(]#1#2
    newcommandintco[2][-1]genericdel[)#1#2
    newcommandeval[2][-1]#1#2
    newcommandenvert[2][-1]#1#2
    letabsenvert
    newcommandsVert[1][0]orbiggr
    newcommandenVert[2][-1]#1#2
    letnormenVert
    newcommandfullfunction[5]%
    beginarray@r@r@c@l@
    #1 colon & #2 & longrightarrow & #3 \
    & #4 & longmapsto & #5
    endarray

    %%% end of the definitions
    makeatother


    DeclareMathOperatorTrTr

    begindocument

    Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
    [
    h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
    ]
    where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
    beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
    item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
    item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity,
    the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
    endenumerate

    enddocument


    The code has already been presented in https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/135985/4427 and provides a full replacement of commath, avoiding all its weaknesses. If you're tied to commath because you use its macros and features in other places, this can save you. Otherwise define abs with DeclarePairedDelimiter as suggested by Mico.



    For instance, you can notice the reduced space between “where” and “|G|” in the commath version.



    enter image description here



    You should define anyway an operator name for “Tr”.



    If you decide to go for this, save the part between



    % begin definitions for a "better commath"


    and



    % end of the definitions


    in a file called bettercommath.sty in the working directory and do usepackagebettercommath.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      Compare the output of



      documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
      usepackageamsmath
      usepackageenumitem
      usepackagecommath

      DeclareMathOperatorTrTr

      begindocument

      Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
      [
      h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
      ]
      where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
      beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
      item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
      item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity,
      the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
      endenumerate

      enddocument


      enter image description here



      with the output of



      documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
      usepackageamsmath
      usepackageenumitem

      makeatletter
      % begin definitions for a "better commath"

      newcommanddifmathop!mathrmd
      newcommandDifmathop!mathrmD

      newcommandspx[1]%
      ifrelaxdetokenize#1relax
      expandafter@gobble
      else
      expandafter@firstofone
      fi
      ^#1%


      newcommandpd[3][]fracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1
      newcommandtpd[3][]tfracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1
      newcommanddpd[3][]dfracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1

      newcommandmd[6]fracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6
      newcommandtmd[6]tfracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6
      newcommanddmd[6]dfracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6

      newcommandod[3][]fracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1
      newcommandtod[3][]tfracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1
      newcommanddod[3][]dfracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1

      newcommandgenericdel[4]%
      ifcase#3relax
      ifx#1.else#1fi#4ifx#2.else#2fior
      bigl#1#4bigr#2or
      Bigl#1#4Bigr#2or
      biggl#1#4biggr#2or
      Biggl#1#4Biggr#2else
      left#1#4right#2fi

      newcommanddel[2][-1]genericdel()#1#2
      newcommandset[2][-1]genericdel#1#2
      letcbrset
      newcommandsbr[2][-1]genericdel[]#1#2
      letintoodel
      letintccsbr
      newcommandintoc[2][-1]genericdel(]#1#2
      newcommandintco[2][-1]genericdel[)#1#2
      newcommandeval[2][-1]#1#2
      newcommandenvert[2][-1]#1#2
      letabsenvert
      newcommandsVert[1][0]orbiggr
      newcommandenVert[2][-1]#1#2
      letnormenVert
      newcommandfullfunction[5]%
      beginarray@r@r@c@l@
      #1 colon & #2 & longrightarrow & #3 \
      & #4 & longmapsto & #5
      endarray

      %%% end of the definitions
      makeatother


      DeclareMathOperatorTrTr

      begindocument

      Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
      [
      h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
      ]
      where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
      beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
      item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
      item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity,
      the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
      endenumerate

      enddocument


      The code has already been presented in https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/135985/4427 and provides a full replacement of commath, avoiding all its weaknesses. If you're tied to commath because you use its macros and features in other places, this can save you. Otherwise define abs with DeclarePairedDelimiter as suggested by Mico.



      For instance, you can notice the reduced space between “where” and “|G|” in the commath version.



      enter image description here



      You should define anyway an operator name for “Tr”.



      If you decide to go for this, save the part between



      % begin definitions for a "better commath"


      and



      % end of the definitions


      in a file called bettercommath.sty in the working directory and do usepackagebettercommath.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        Compare the output of



        documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackageenumitem
        usepackagecommath

        DeclareMathOperatorTrTr

        begindocument

        Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
        [
        h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
        ]
        where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
        beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
        item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
        item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity,
        the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
        endenumerate

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        with the output of



        documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackageenumitem

        makeatletter
        % begin definitions for a "better commath"

        newcommanddifmathop!mathrmd
        newcommandDifmathop!mathrmD

        newcommandspx[1]%
        ifrelaxdetokenize#1relax
        expandafter@gobble
        else
        expandafter@firstofone
        fi
        ^#1%


        newcommandpd[3][]fracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1
        newcommandtpd[3][]tfracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1
        newcommanddpd[3][]dfracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1

        newcommandmd[6]fracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6
        newcommandtmd[6]tfracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6
        newcommanddmd[6]dfracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6

        newcommandod[3][]fracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1
        newcommandtod[3][]tfracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1
        newcommanddod[3][]dfracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1

        newcommandgenericdel[4]%
        ifcase#3relax
        ifx#1.else#1fi#4ifx#2.else#2fior
        bigl#1#4bigr#2or
        Bigl#1#4Bigr#2or
        biggl#1#4biggr#2or
        Biggl#1#4Biggr#2else
        left#1#4right#2fi

        newcommanddel[2][-1]genericdel()#1#2
        newcommandset[2][-1]genericdel#1#2
        letcbrset
        newcommandsbr[2][-1]genericdel[]#1#2
        letintoodel
        letintccsbr
        newcommandintoc[2][-1]genericdel(]#1#2
        newcommandintco[2][-1]genericdel[)#1#2
        newcommandeval[2][-1]#1#2
        newcommandenvert[2][-1]#1#2
        letabsenvert
        newcommandsVert[1][0]orbiggr
        newcommandenVert[2][-1]#1#2
        letnormenVert
        newcommandfullfunction[5]%
        beginarray@r@r@c@l@
        #1 colon & #2 & longrightarrow & #3 \
        & #4 & longmapsto & #5
        endarray

        %%% end of the definitions
        makeatother


        DeclareMathOperatorTrTr

        begindocument

        Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
        [
        h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
        ]
        where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
        beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
        item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
        item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity,
        the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
        endenumerate

        enddocument


        The code has already been presented in https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/135985/4427 and provides a full replacement of commath, avoiding all its weaknesses. If you're tied to commath because you use its macros and features in other places, this can save you. Otherwise define abs with DeclarePairedDelimiter as suggested by Mico.



        For instance, you can notice the reduced space between “where” and “|G|” in the commath version.



        enter image description here



        You should define anyway an operator name for “Tr”.



        If you decide to go for this, save the part between



        % begin definitions for a "better commath"


        and



        % end of the definitions


        in a file called bettercommath.sty in the working directory and do usepackagebettercommath.






        share|improve this answer













        Compare the output of



        documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackageenumitem
        usepackagecommath

        DeclareMathOperatorTrTr

        begindocument

        Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
        [
        h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
        ]
        where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
        beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
        item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
        item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity,
        the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
        endenumerate

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        with the output of



        documentclass[11pt, a4paper]report
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackageenumitem

        makeatletter
        % begin definitions for a "better commath"

        newcommanddifmathop!mathrmd
        newcommandDifmathop!mathrmD

        newcommandspx[1]%
        ifrelaxdetokenize#1relax
        expandafter@gobble
        else
        expandafter@firstofone
        fi
        ^#1%


        newcommandpd[3][]fracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1
        newcommandtpd[3][]tfracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1
        newcommanddpd[3][]dfracpartialspx#1#2partial#3spx#1

        newcommandmd[6]fracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6
        newcommandtmd[6]tfracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6
        newcommanddmd[6]dfracpartialspx#2#1partial#3spx#4partial#5spx#6

        newcommandod[3][]fracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1
        newcommandtod[3][]tfracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1
        newcommanddod[3][]dfracdifspx#1#2dif#3spx#1

        newcommandgenericdel[4]%
        ifcase#3relax
        ifx#1.else#1fi#4ifx#2.else#2fior
        bigl#1#4bigr#2or
        Bigl#1#4Bigr#2or
        biggl#1#4biggr#2or
        Biggl#1#4Biggr#2else
        left#1#4right#2fi

        newcommanddel[2][-1]genericdel()#1#2
        newcommandset[2][-1]genericdel#1#2
        letcbrset
        newcommandsbr[2][-1]genericdel[]#1#2
        letintoodel
        letintccsbr
        newcommandintoc[2][-1]genericdel(]#1#2
        newcommandintco[2][-1]genericdel[)#1#2
        newcommandeval[2][-1]#1#2
        newcommandenvert[2][-1]#1#2
        letabsenvert
        newcommandsVert[1][0]orbiggr
        newcommandenVert[2][-1]#1#2
        letnormenVert
        newcommandfullfunction[5]%
        beginarray@r@r@c@l@
        #1 colon & #2 & longrightarrow & #3 \
        & #4 & longmapsto & #5
        endarray

        %%% end of the definitions
        makeatother


        DeclareMathOperatorTrTr

        begindocument

        Let $h$ be a linear mapping of $V_1$ into $V_2$. Let
        [
        h^0 = frac1abs G sum_tin G (rho_t^2)^-1 h rho_t^1
        ]
        where $abs G$ is the order of $G$. Then
        beginenumerate[label=(roman*)]
        item If $rho^1$ and $rho^2$ are not isomorphic then we have $h^0=0$
        item If $V_1 = V_2$ and $rho^1 = rho^2$, $h^0$ is a scalar multiple of the identity,
        the scalar being $frac1n Tr(h)$ where $n = dim(V_1)$
        endenumerate

        enddocument


        The code has already been presented in https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/135985/4427 and provides a full replacement of commath, avoiding all its weaknesses. If you're tied to commath because you use its macros and features in other places, this can save you. Otherwise define abs with DeclarePairedDelimiter as suggested by Mico.



        For instance, you can notice the reduced space between “where” and “|G|” in the commath version.



        enter image description here



        You should define anyway an operator name for “Tr”.



        If you decide to go for this, save the part between



        % begin definitions for a "better commath"


        and



        % end of the definitions


        in a file called bettercommath.sty in the working directory and do usepackagebettercommath.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        egregegreg

        733k8919313254




        733k8919313254



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483944%2ffractional-alignment%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?