How can a day be of 24 hours? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHours of light per day based on latitude/longitude formulaWhat accounts for the discrepancies in my calculations of year lengths?Why a day is divided by 12/24 hours? Why the number 12?Calculating the length of day at any time of the year?How is UT1 being computed?Day/night cycle in GreenlandHow many hours will there be in a day 5,000,000,000 years from now?How have the duration of the martian day changed in the past?Why was the fraction 1/31,556,925.9747, in the 1956-1968 definition of the second in terms of ephemeris time, chosen?Is zero shadow day the longest day

Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?

Could you use a laser beam as a modulated carrier wave for radio signal?

What happens if you break a law in another country outside of that country?

How to show a landlord what we have in savings?

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?

Why was Sir Cadogan fired?

How to coordinate airplane tickets?

What does this strange code stamp on my passport mean?

How to pronounce fünf in 45

Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?

What difference does it make matching a word with/without a trailing whitespace?

Strange use of "whether ... than ..." in official text

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?

Car headlights in a world without electricity

MT "will strike" & LXX "will watch carefully" (Gen 3:15)?

Direct Implications Between USA and UK in Event of No-Deal Brexit

Could a dragon use hot air to help it take off?

Is it possible to make a 9x9 table fit within the default margins?

Why do we say “un seul M” and not “une seule M” even though M is a “consonne”?

Can this transistor (2N2222) take 6 V on emitter-base? Am I reading the datasheet incorrectly?

Upgrading From a 9 Speed Sora Derailleur?

How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?

Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact

How dangerous is XSS



How can a day be of 24 hours?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHours of light per day based on latitude/longitude formulaWhat accounts for the discrepancies in my calculations of year lengths?Why a day is divided by 12/24 hours? Why the number 12?Calculating the length of day at any time of the year?How is UT1 being computed?Day/night cycle in GreenlandHow many hours will there be in a day 5,000,000,000 years from now?How have the duration of the martian day changed in the past?Why was the fraction 1/31,556,925.9747, in the 1956-1968 definition of the second in terms of ephemeris time, chosen?Is zero shadow day the longest day










13












$begingroup$


The longest solar day of year is approximately 24 hours 0 min 30 seconds (occurs at mid to late December) while shortest solar day of year is approximately 23 hour 59min 38 seconds. If average out both of these I come up with average solar day of 24 hour +4seconds. Why then it is said it is 24 h 0min 0 seconds exactly??



Wouldn't using a 24 hour solar day as a definition of day cause the offset of 4 seconds each solar year










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related: "Leap second", Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    18 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Also see leapsecond.com for a plethora of articles about timekeeping, especially the articles by Steve Allen of Lick Observatory. That's a rather old page, and some of its links are now dead, but there's still plenty of good info there.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    17 hours ago
















13












$begingroup$


The longest solar day of year is approximately 24 hours 0 min 30 seconds (occurs at mid to late December) while shortest solar day of year is approximately 23 hour 59min 38 seconds. If average out both of these I come up with average solar day of 24 hour +4seconds. Why then it is said it is 24 h 0min 0 seconds exactly??



Wouldn't using a 24 hour solar day as a definition of day cause the offset of 4 seconds each solar year










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related: "Leap second", Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    18 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Also see leapsecond.com for a plethora of articles about timekeeping, especially the articles by Steve Allen of Lick Observatory. That's a rather old page, and some of its links are now dead, but there's still plenty of good info there.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    17 hours ago














13












13








13


1



$begingroup$


The longest solar day of year is approximately 24 hours 0 min 30 seconds (occurs at mid to late December) while shortest solar day of year is approximately 23 hour 59min 38 seconds. If average out both of these I come up with average solar day of 24 hour +4seconds. Why then it is said it is 24 h 0min 0 seconds exactly??



Wouldn't using a 24 hour solar day as a definition of day cause the offset of 4 seconds each solar year










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The longest solar day of year is approximately 24 hours 0 min 30 seconds (occurs at mid to late December) while shortest solar day of year is approximately 23 hour 59min 38 seconds. If average out both of these I come up with average solar day of 24 hour +4seconds. Why then it is said it is 24 h 0min 0 seconds exactly??



Wouldn't using a 24 hour solar day as a definition of day cause the offset of 4 seconds each solar year







time astronomy earth solar-system metrology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 18 hours ago









Qmechanic

107k121991231




107k121991231










asked 18 hours ago









ObsessionWithElectricityObsessionWithElectricity

4151312




4151312







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related: "Leap second", Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    18 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Also see leapsecond.com for a plethora of articles about timekeeping, especially the articles by Steve Allen of Lick Observatory. That's a rather old page, and some of its links are now dead, but there's still plenty of good info there.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    17 hours ago













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related: "Leap second", Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    18 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Also see leapsecond.com for a plethora of articles about timekeeping, especially the articles by Steve Allen of Lick Observatory. That's a rather old page, and some of its links are now dead, but there's still plenty of good info there.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    17 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
Related: "Leap second", Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Nat
18 hours ago




$begingroup$
Related: "Leap second", Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Nat
18 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Also see leapsecond.com for a plethora of articles about timekeeping, especially the articles by Steve Allen of Lick Observatory. That's a rather old page, and some of its links are now dead, but there's still plenty of good info there.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
17 hours ago





$begingroup$
Also see leapsecond.com for a plethora of articles about timekeeping, especially the articles by Steve Allen of Lick Observatory. That's a rather old page, and some of its links are now dead, but there's still plenty of good info there.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
17 hours ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















36












$begingroup$

You can't calculate the length of a mean solar day just by taking the mean of the shortest & longest apparent solar days. That would work if the apparent day lengths varied in a simple linear fashion, but that's not the case.



From Wikipedia's article on the Equation of Time,




The equation of time describes the discrepancy between two kinds
of solar time. [...] The two times that differ are the apparent solar
time, which directly tracks the diurnal motion of the Sun,
and mean solar time, which tracks a theoretical mean Sun with uniform
motion.




This graph shows the cumulative differences between mean & apparent solar time:



Equation of time




The equation of time — above the axis a sundial will
appear fast relative to a clock showing local mean time, and below the
axis a sundial will appear slow.




To correctly calculate the mean solar day length you need to integrate the apparent day lengths over the whole year. (And you need to decide exactly how to define the length of the year, which is a whole complicated story in its own right).



There are two primary causes of the Equation of Time.
1. The obliquity of the plane of Earth's orbit (the ecliptic plane), which is tilted approximately 23° relative to the equatorial plane. This tilt is also responsible for the seasons.
2. The eccentricity of Earth's orbit, which causes the Earth's orbital speed to vary over the year. The following graph shows how these two components combine to create the Equation of Time.



Equation of Time components




Equation of time (red solid line) and its two main components plotted
separately, the part due to the obliquity of the ecliptic (mauve
dashed line) and the part due to the Sun's varying apparent speed
along the ecliptic due to eccentricity of the Earth's orbit (dark blue
dash & dot line)




Please see the linked Wikipedia article for further details.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And, then, once in a while, we need leap seconds.
    $endgroup$
    – Draco18s
    16 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Draco18s Indeed! Accurate timekeeping is a complex & subtle business. See leapsecond.com, which I also linked in my comment on the question.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    16 hours ago







  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Can we take a moment to acknowledge that 'The Equation of Time' is one of the most badass names for an equation that I have ever encountered?
    $endgroup$
    – Arcanist Lupus
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's worth noting that in terms of the actual length of a day (above or below 24 hours), the mauve line in that diagram makes a substantially bigger contribution than the dark line - more so than this diagram would suggest. The reason is that the length of a day is effectively the time-derivative of the equation of time; and the mauve line is rather steeper than the dark line (as well as having a slightly greater amplitude).
    $endgroup$
    – Dawood ibn Kareem
    1 hour ago



















8












$begingroup$

The average value of a distribution is not the average of its minimum and maximum. For example, the average value of (0,0,0,4) is 1, not 2. Earth's orbit excentricity is not 0, nor the Moon's one, so your distribution of day duration is probably slightly asymetric, hence the 4 seconds discrepancy. Sum all day duration of a year, divide by the number of days, you will get a better value.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where can I get solar day length information of the whole year??
    $endgroup$
    – ObsessionWithElectricity
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I could find data here: hpiers.obspm.fr/eoppc/eop/eopc04/eopc04.62-now - I think that UT1-UTC is the discrepancy to 86400 of day duration, in seconds, from 1962 to now.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    17 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Matt I don't think that data is what you think it is. The longest solar days are always in late December (around Christmas); and the shortest ones are in mid September. That doesn't fit with the data you've given.
    $endgroup$
    – Dawood ibn Kareem
    1 hour ago


















6












$begingroup$

The original definition of an hour was 1/24th of a day, no matter how long the day was at the time. The durations you're quoting are only possible with the help of extremely modern definitions made possible by redefining the second (keeping the minute and hour fixed as 60 seconds, and 3600 seconds, respectively).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't disagree, but do you have 1) a date when that became the official definition of an hour, and 2) when it was conventionally determined to use 1/24 and not 1/10 or 1/20 of a day? I've read undocumented sources that mention the daylight being divided into tenths historically prior to twelfths.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill N
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    More details in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hour
    $endgroup$
    – Stéphane Rollandin
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The mean solar day is 86400.0025 seconds, so while the reason in this answer has some effect, it only accounts for 2.5 ms of the 4 second discrepancy in the question.
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    14 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469869%2fhow-can-a-day-be-of-24-hours%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









36












$begingroup$

You can't calculate the length of a mean solar day just by taking the mean of the shortest & longest apparent solar days. That would work if the apparent day lengths varied in a simple linear fashion, but that's not the case.



From Wikipedia's article on the Equation of Time,




The equation of time describes the discrepancy between two kinds
of solar time. [...] The two times that differ are the apparent solar
time, which directly tracks the diurnal motion of the Sun,
and mean solar time, which tracks a theoretical mean Sun with uniform
motion.




This graph shows the cumulative differences between mean & apparent solar time:



Equation of time




The equation of time — above the axis a sundial will
appear fast relative to a clock showing local mean time, and below the
axis a sundial will appear slow.




To correctly calculate the mean solar day length you need to integrate the apparent day lengths over the whole year. (And you need to decide exactly how to define the length of the year, which is a whole complicated story in its own right).



There are two primary causes of the Equation of Time.
1. The obliquity of the plane of Earth's orbit (the ecliptic plane), which is tilted approximately 23° relative to the equatorial plane. This tilt is also responsible for the seasons.
2. The eccentricity of Earth's orbit, which causes the Earth's orbital speed to vary over the year. The following graph shows how these two components combine to create the Equation of Time.



Equation of Time components




Equation of time (red solid line) and its two main components plotted
separately, the part due to the obliquity of the ecliptic (mauve
dashed line) and the part due to the Sun's varying apparent speed
along the ecliptic due to eccentricity of the Earth's orbit (dark blue
dash & dot line)




Please see the linked Wikipedia article for further details.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And, then, once in a while, we need leap seconds.
    $endgroup$
    – Draco18s
    16 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Draco18s Indeed! Accurate timekeeping is a complex & subtle business. See leapsecond.com, which I also linked in my comment on the question.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    16 hours ago







  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Can we take a moment to acknowledge that 'The Equation of Time' is one of the most badass names for an equation that I have ever encountered?
    $endgroup$
    – Arcanist Lupus
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's worth noting that in terms of the actual length of a day (above or below 24 hours), the mauve line in that diagram makes a substantially bigger contribution than the dark line - more so than this diagram would suggest. The reason is that the length of a day is effectively the time-derivative of the equation of time; and the mauve line is rather steeper than the dark line (as well as having a slightly greater amplitude).
    $endgroup$
    – Dawood ibn Kareem
    1 hour ago
















36












$begingroup$

You can't calculate the length of a mean solar day just by taking the mean of the shortest & longest apparent solar days. That would work if the apparent day lengths varied in a simple linear fashion, but that's not the case.



From Wikipedia's article on the Equation of Time,




The equation of time describes the discrepancy between two kinds
of solar time. [...] The two times that differ are the apparent solar
time, which directly tracks the diurnal motion of the Sun,
and mean solar time, which tracks a theoretical mean Sun with uniform
motion.




This graph shows the cumulative differences between mean & apparent solar time:



Equation of time




The equation of time — above the axis a sundial will
appear fast relative to a clock showing local mean time, and below the
axis a sundial will appear slow.




To correctly calculate the mean solar day length you need to integrate the apparent day lengths over the whole year. (And you need to decide exactly how to define the length of the year, which is a whole complicated story in its own right).



There are two primary causes of the Equation of Time.
1. The obliquity of the plane of Earth's orbit (the ecliptic plane), which is tilted approximately 23° relative to the equatorial plane. This tilt is also responsible for the seasons.
2. The eccentricity of Earth's orbit, which causes the Earth's orbital speed to vary over the year. The following graph shows how these two components combine to create the Equation of Time.



Equation of Time components




Equation of time (red solid line) and its two main components plotted
separately, the part due to the obliquity of the ecliptic (mauve
dashed line) and the part due to the Sun's varying apparent speed
along the ecliptic due to eccentricity of the Earth's orbit (dark blue
dash & dot line)




Please see the linked Wikipedia article for further details.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And, then, once in a while, we need leap seconds.
    $endgroup$
    – Draco18s
    16 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Draco18s Indeed! Accurate timekeeping is a complex & subtle business. See leapsecond.com, which I also linked in my comment on the question.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    16 hours ago







  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Can we take a moment to acknowledge that 'The Equation of Time' is one of the most badass names for an equation that I have ever encountered?
    $endgroup$
    – Arcanist Lupus
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's worth noting that in terms of the actual length of a day (above or below 24 hours), the mauve line in that diagram makes a substantially bigger contribution than the dark line - more so than this diagram would suggest. The reason is that the length of a day is effectively the time-derivative of the equation of time; and the mauve line is rather steeper than the dark line (as well as having a slightly greater amplitude).
    $endgroup$
    – Dawood ibn Kareem
    1 hour ago














36












36








36





$begingroup$

You can't calculate the length of a mean solar day just by taking the mean of the shortest & longest apparent solar days. That would work if the apparent day lengths varied in a simple linear fashion, but that's not the case.



From Wikipedia's article on the Equation of Time,




The equation of time describes the discrepancy between two kinds
of solar time. [...] The two times that differ are the apparent solar
time, which directly tracks the diurnal motion of the Sun,
and mean solar time, which tracks a theoretical mean Sun with uniform
motion.




This graph shows the cumulative differences between mean & apparent solar time:



Equation of time




The equation of time — above the axis a sundial will
appear fast relative to a clock showing local mean time, and below the
axis a sundial will appear slow.




To correctly calculate the mean solar day length you need to integrate the apparent day lengths over the whole year. (And you need to decide exactly how to define the length of the year, which is a whole complicated story in its own right).



There are two primary causes of the Equation of Time.
1. The obliquity of the plane of Earth's orbit (the ecliptic plane), which is tilted approximately 23° relative to the equatorial plane. This tilt is also responsible for the seasons.
2. The eccentricity of Earth's orbit, which causes the Earth's orbital speed to vary over the year. The following graph shows how these two components combine to create the Equation of Time.



Equation of Time components




Equation of time (red solid line) and its two main components plotted
separately, the part due to the obliquity of the ecliptic (mauve
dashed line) and the part due to the Sun's varying apparent speed
along the ecliptic due to eccentricity of the Earth's orbit (dark blue
dash & dot line)




Please see the linked Wikipedia article for further details.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You can't calculate the length of a mean solar day just by taking the mean of the shortest & longest apparent solar days. That would work if the apparent day lengths varied in a simple linear fashion, but that's not the case.



From Wikipedia's article on the Equation of Time,




The equation of time describes the discrepancy between two kinds
of solar time. [...] The two times that differ are the apparent solar
time, which directly tracks the diurnal motion of the Sun,
and mean solar time, which tracks a theoretical mean Sun with uniform
motion.




This graph shows the cumulative differences between mean & apparent solar time:



Equation of time




The equation of time — above the axis a sundial will
appear fast relative to a clock showing local mean time, and below the
axis a sundial will appear slow.




To correctly calculate the mean solar day length you need to integrate the apparent day lengths over the whole year. (And you need to decide exactly how to define the length of the year, which is a whole complicated story in its own right).



There are two primary causes of the Equation of Time.
1. The obliquity of the plane of Earth's orbit (the ecliptic plane), which is tilted approximately 23° relative to the equatorial plane. This tilt is also responsible for the seasons.
2. The eccentricity of Earth's orbit, which causes the Earth's orbital speed to vary over the year. The following graph shows how these two components combine to create the Equation of Time.



Equation of Time components




Equation of time (red solid line) and its two main components plotted
separately, the part due to the obliquity of the ecliptic (mauve
dashed line) and the part due to the Sun's varying apparent speed
along the ecliptic due to eccentricity of the Earth's orbit (dark blue
dash & dot line)




Please see the linked Wikipedia article for further details.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 17 hours ago









PM 2RingPM 2Ring

3,43321023




3,43321023







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And, then, once in a while, we need leap seconds.
    $endgroup$
    – Draco18s
    16 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Draco18s Indeed! Accurate timekeeping is a complex & subtle business. See leapsecond.com, which I also linked in my comment on the question.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    16 hours ago







  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Can we take a moment to acknowledge that 'The Equation of Time' is one of the most badass names for an equation that I have ever encountered?
    $endgroup$
    – Arcanist Lupus
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's worth noting that in terms of the actual length of a day (above or below 24 hours), the mauve line in that diagram makes a substantially bigger contribution than the dark line - more so than this diagram would suggest. The reason is that the length of a day is effectively the time-derivative of the equation of time; and the mauve line is rather steeper than the dark line (as well as having a slightly greater amplitude).
    $endgroup$
    – Dawood ibn Kareem
    1 hour ago













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And, then, once in a while, we need leap seconds.
    $endgroup$
    – Draco18s
    16 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Draco18s Indeed! Accurate timekeeping is a complex & subtle business. See leapsecond.com, which I also linked in my comment on the question.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    16 hours ago







  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Can we take a moment to acknowledge that 'The Equation of Time' is one of the most badass names for an equation that I have ever encountered?
    $endgroup$
    – Arcanist Lupus
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's worth noting that in terms of the actual length of a day (above or below 24 hours), the mauve line in that diagram makes a substantially bigger contribution than the dark line - more so than this diagram would suggest. The reason is that the length of a day is effectively the time-derivative of the equation of time; and the mauve line is rather steeper than the dark line (as well as having a slightly greater amplitude).
    $endgroup$
    – Dawood ibn Kareem
    1 hour ago








2




2




$begingroup$
And, then, once in a while, we need leap seconds.
$endgroup$
– Draco18s
16 hours ago




$begingroup$
And, then, once in a while, we need leap seconds.
$endgroup$
– Draco18s
16 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
@Draco18s Indeed! Accurate timekeeping is a complex & subtle business. See leapsecond.com, which I also linked in my comment on the question.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
16 hours ago





$begingroup$
@Draco18s Indeed! Accurate timekeeping is a complex & subtle business. See leapsecond.com, which I also linked in my comment on the question.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
16 hours ago





8




8




$begingroup$
Can we take a moment to acknowledge that 'The Equation of Time' is one of the most badass names for an equation that I have ever encountered?
$endgroup$
– Arcanist Lupus
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Can we take a moment to acknowledge that 'The Equation of Time' is one of the most badass names for an equation that I have ever encountered?
$endgroup$
– Arcanist Lupus
11 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
It's worth noting that in terms of the actual length of a day (above or below 24 hours), the mauve line in that diagram makes a substantially bigger contribution than the dark line - more so than this diagram would suggest. The reason is that the length of a day is effectively the time-derivative of the equation of time; and the mauve line is rather steeper than the dark line (as well as having a slightly greater amplitude).
$endgroup$
– Dawood ibn Kareem
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
It's worth noting that in terms of the actual length of a day (above or below 24 hours), the mauve line in that diagram makes a substantially bigger contribution than the dark line - more so than this diagram would suggest. The reason is that the length of a day is effectively the time-derivative of the equation of time; and the mauve line is rather steeper than the dark line (as well as having a slightly greater amplitude).
$endgroup$
– Dawood ibn Kareem
1 hour ago












8












$begingroup$

The average value of a distribution is not the average of its minimum and maximum. For example, the average value of (0,0,0,4) is 1, not 2. Earth's orbit excentricity is not 0, nor the Moon's one, so your distribution of day duration is probably slightly asymetric, hence the 4 seconds discrepancy. Sum all day duration of a year, divide by the number of days, you will get a better value.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where can I get solar day length information of the whole year??
    $endgroup$
    – ObsessionWithElectricity
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I could find data here: hpiers.obspm.fr/eoppc/eop/eopc04/eopc04.62-now - I think that UT1-UTC is the discrepancy to 86400 of day duration, in seconds, from 1962 to now.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    17 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Matt I don't think that data is what you think it is. The longest solar days are always in late December (around Christmas); and the shortest ones are in mid September. That doesn't fit with the data you've given.
    $endgroup$
    – Dawood ibn Kareem
    1 hour ago















8












$begingroup$

The average value of a distribution is not the average of its minimum and maximum. For example, the average value of (0,0,0,4) is 1, not 2. Earth's orbit excentricity is not 0, nor the Moon's one, so your distribution of day duration is probably slightly asymetric, hence the 4 seconds discrepancy. Sum all day duration of a year, divide by the number of days, you will get a better value.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where can I get solar day length information of the whole year??
    $endgroup$
    – ObsessionWithElectricity
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I could find data here: hpiers.obspm.fr/eoppc/eop/eopc04/eopc04.62-now - I think that UT1-UTC is the discrepancy to 86400 of day duration, in seconds, from 1962 to now.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    17 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Matt I don't think that data is what you think it is. The longest solar days are always in late December (around Christmas); and the shortest ones are in mid September. That doesn't fit with the data you've given.
    $endgroup$
    – Dawood ibn Kareem
    1 hour ago













8












8








8





$begingroup$

The average value of a distribution is not the average of its minimum and maximum. For example, the average value of (0,0,0,4) is 1, not 2. Earth's orbit excentricity is not 0, nor the Moon's one, so your distribution of day duration is probably slightly asymetric, hence the 4 seconds discrepancy. Sum all day duration of a year, divide by the number of days, you will get a better value.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$



The average value of a distribution is not the average of its minimum and maximum. For example, the average value of (0,0,0,4) is 1, not 2. Earth's orbit excentricity is not 0, nor the Moon's one, so your distribution of day duration is probably slightly asymetric, hence the 4 seconds discrepancy. Sum all day duration of a year, divide by the number of days, you will get a better value.







share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer






New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 18 hours ago









MattMatt

1812




1812




New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where can I get solar day length information of the whole year??
    $endgroup$
    – ObsessionWithElectricity
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I could find data here: hpiers.obspm.fr/eoppc/eop/eopc04/eopc04.62-now - I think that UT1-UTC is the discrepancy to 86400 of day duration, in seconds, from 1962 to now.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    17 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Matt I don't think that data is what you think it is. The longest solar days are always in late December (around Christmas); and the shortest ones are in mid September. That doesn't fit with the data you've given.
    $endgroup$
    – Dawood ibn Kareem
    1 hour ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where can I get solar day length information of the whole year??
    $endgroup$
    – ObsessionWithElectricity
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I could find data here: hpiers.obspm.fr/eoppc/eop/eopc04/eopc04.62-now - I think that UT1-UTC is the discrepancy to 86400 of day duration, in seconds, from 1962 to now.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    17 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Matt I don't think that data is what you think it is. The longest solar days are always in late December (around Christmas); and the shortest ones are in mid September. That doesn't fit with the data you've given.
    $endgroup$
    – Dawood ibn Kareem
    1 hour ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Where can I get solar day length information of the whole year??
$endgroup$
– ObsessionWithElectricity
18 hours ago




$begingroup$
Where can I get solar day length information of the whole year??
$endgroup$
– ObsessionWithElectricity
18 hours ago












$begingroup$
I could find data here: hpiers.obspm.fr/eoppc/eop/eopc04/eopc04.62-now - I think that UT1-UTC is the discrepancy to 86400 of day duration, in seconds, from 1962 to now.
$endgroup$
– Matt
17 hours ago




$begingroup$
I could find data here: hpiers.obspm.fr/eoppc/eop/eopc04/eopc04.62-now - I think that UT1-UTC is the discrepancy to 86400 of day duration, in seconds, from 1962 to now.
$endgroup$
– Matt
17 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Matt I don't think that data is what you think it is. The longest solar days are always in late December (around Christmas); and the shortest ones are in mid September. That doesn't fit with the data you've given.
$endgroup$
– Dawood ibn Kareem
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@Matt I don't think that data is what you think it is. The longest solar days are always in late December (around Christmas); and the shortest ones are in mid September. That doesn't fit with the data you've given.
$endgroup$
– Dawood ibn Kareem
1 hour ago











6












$begingroup$

The original definition of an hour was 1/24th of a day, no matter how long the day was at the time. The durations you're quoting are only possible with the help of extremely modern definitions made possible by redefining the second (keeping the minute and hour fixed as 60 seconds, and 3600 seconds, respectively).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't disagree, but do you have 1) a date when that became the official definition of an hour, and 2) when it was conventionally determined to use 1/24 and not 1/10 or 1/20 of a day? I've read undocumented sources that mention the daylight being divided into tenths historically prior to twelfths.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill N
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    More details in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hour
    $endgroup$
    – Stéphane Rollandin
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The mean solar day is 86400.0025 seconds, so while the reason in this answer has some effect, it only accounts for 2.5 ms of the 4 second discrepancy in the question.
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    14 hours ago















6












$begingroup$

The original definition of an hour was 1/24th of a day, no matter how long the day was at the time. The durations you're quoting are only possible with the help of extremely modern definitions made possible by redefining the second (keeping the minute and hour fixed as 60 seconds, and 3600 seconds, respectively).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't disagree, but do you have 1) a date when that became the official definition of an hour, and 2) when it was conventionally determined to use 1/24 and not 1/10 or 1/20 of a day? I've read undocumented sources that mention the daylight being divided into tenths historically prior to twelfths.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill N
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    More details in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hour
    $endgroup$
    – Stéphane Rollandin
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The mean solar day is 86400.0025 seconds, so while the reason in this answer has some effect, it only accounts for 2.5 ms of the 4 second discrepancy in the question.
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    14 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$

The original definition of an hour was 1/24th of a day, no matter how long the day was at the time. The durations you're quoting are only possible with the help of extremely modern definitions made possible by redefining the second (keeping the minute and hour fixed as 60 seconds, and 3600 seconds, respectively).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The original definition of an hour was 1/24th of a day, no matter how long the day was at the time. The durations you're quoting are only possible with the help of extremely modern definitions made possible by redefining the second (keeping the minute and hour fixed as 60 seconds, and 3600 seconds, respectively).







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 18 hours ago









Sean E. LakeSean E. Lake

14.6k12350




14.6k12350











  • $begingroup$
    I don't disagree, but do you have 1) a date when that became the official definition of an hour, and 2) when it was conventionally determined to use 1/24 and not 1/10 or 1/20 of a day? I've read undocumented sources that mention the daylight being divided into tenths historically prior to twelfths.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill N
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    More details in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hour
    $endgroup$
    – Stéphane Rollandin
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The mean solar day is 86400.0025 seconds, so while the reason in this answer has some effect, it only accounts for 2.5 ms of the 4 second discrepancy in the question.
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    14 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I don't disagree, but do you have 1) a date when that became the official definition of an hour, and 2) when it was conventionally determined to use 1/24 and not 1/10 or 1/20 of a day? I've read undocumented sources that mention the daylight being divided into tenths historically prior to twelfths.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill N
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    More details in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hour
    $endgroup$
    – Stéphane Rollandin
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The mean solar day is 86400.0025 seconds, so while the reason in this answer has some effect, it only accounts for 2.5 ms of the 4 second discrepancy in the question.
    $endgroup$
    – JiK
    14 hours ago















$begingroup$
I don't disagree, but do you have 1) a date when that became the official definition of an hour, and 2) when it was conventionally determined to use 1/24 and not 1/10 or 1/20 of a day? I've read undocumented sources that mention the daylight being divided into tenths historically prior to twelfths.
$endgroup$
– Bill N
18 hours ago




$begingroup$
I don't disagree, but do you have 1) a date when that became the official definition of an hour, and 2) when it was conventionally determined to use 1/24 and not 1/10 or 1/20 of a day? I've read undocumented sources that mention the daylight being divided into tenths historically prior to twelfths.
$endgroup$
– Bill N
18 hours ago












$begingroup$
More details in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hour
$endgroup$
– Stéphane Rollandin
18 hours ago




$begingroup$
More details in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hour
$endgroup$
– Stéphane Rollandin
18 hours ago












$begingroup$
The mean solar day is 86400.0025 seconds, so while the reason in this answer has some effect, it only accounts for 2.5 ms of the 4 second discrepancy in the question.
$endgroup$
– JiK
14 hours ago




$begingroup$
The mean solar day is 86400.0025 seconds, so while the reason in this answer has some effect, it only accounts for 2.5 ms of the 4 second discrepancy in the question.
$endgroup$
– JiK
14 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469869%2fhow-can-a-day-be-of-24-hours%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?