contradiction in the aruch hashulchanRiddle: Aruch Hashulchan. Chanukah story missing a wordWhy is the Aruch Hashulchan on Even Haezer incomplete?Why has the Mishnah Berurah become the Authoritative Halachik Work instead of the Aruch haShulchan?Contradiction in the Shulchan Aruch HaravSource in the Aruch HaShulchan to not motzi (exempt) others with after-bracha on mezonot foodsTranslation of the Aruch haShulchanWas the Aruch Hashulchan Sephardic?Arokh HaShulchan and shiur tzitzithDifference between two versions of Aruch HashulchanHow does this explanation in Aruch Hashulchan address the issues regarding Shema times?
Is a single radon daughter atom in air a solid?
"Correct me if I'm wrong"
Heavily limited premature compiler translates text into excecutable python code
Why tighten down in a criss-cross pattern?
Intuition for the role of diffeomorphisms
Why do all the teams that I have worked with always finish a sprint without completion of all the stories?
How do I professionally let my manager know I'll quit over an issue?
What is appropriate short form for "laboratoires" in French?
Can I enter the UK for 24 hours from a Schengen area, holding an Indian passport?
Count All Possible Unique Combinations of Letters in a Word
Has there been any indication at all that further negotiation between the UK and EU is possible?
What does it mean to not be able to take the derivative of a function multiple times?
What are Elsa's reasons for selecting the Holy Grail on behalf of Donovan?
How do I farm creepers for XP without them exploding?
Can Ogre clerics use Purify Food and Drink on humanoid characters?
What is "industrial ethernet"?
How can you guarantee that you won't change/quit job after just couple of months?
Why is it easier to balance a non-moving bike standing up than sitting down?
Why is it recommended to mix yogurt starter with a small amount of milk before adding to the entire batch?
Where's this swanky house and vineyard near a mountain?
Story about hunting giant lizards for hides on privately owned planet
What determines the direction in which motor proteins go?
Boss wants someone else to lead a project based on the idea I presented to him
Will generated tokens be progressively stronger when using Cathar's Crusade and Sorin, Grim Nemesis?
contradiction in the aruch hashulchan
Riddle: Aruch Hashulchan. Chanukah story missing a wordWhy is the Aruch Hashulchan on Even Haezer incomplete?Why has the Mishnah Berurah become the Authoritative Halachik Work instead of the Aruch haShulchan?Contradiction in the Shulchan Aruch HaravSource in the Aruch HaShulchan to not motzi (exempt) others with after-bracha on mezonot foodsTranslation of the Aruch haShulchanWas the Aruch Hashulchan Sephardic?Arokh HaShulchan and shiur tzitzithDifference between two versions of Aruch HashulchanHow does this explanation in Aruch Hashulchan address the issues regarding Shema times?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
the A"H in C"M 263:2 says that mitzvas asei of hashavas aveidah(hasheiv teshiveim) applies only once you pick the object up, however in C:M 259:1 he says it starts once you see the object
halacha lost-and-found aruch-hashulchan
asked Jun 12 at 3:42
AsherAsher
16011
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Asher ending ending at 2019-06-21 03:52:13Z">in 2 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
please look up the aruch hashulchan so you can understand what he is saying
add a comment |
the A"H in C"M 263:2 says that mitzvas asei of hashavas aveidah(hasheiv teshiveim) applies only once you pick the object up, however in C:M 259:1 he says it starts once you see the object
halacha lost-and-found aruch-hashulchan
asked Jun 12 at 3:42
AsherAsher
16011
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Asher ending ending at 2019-06-21 03:52:13Z">in 2 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
please look up the aruch hashulchan so you can understand what he is saying
@רבותמחשבות he is talking about all items that you have intent to return
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:55
add a comment |
the A"H in C"M 263:2 says that mitzvas asei of hashavas aveidah(hasheiv teshiveim) applies only once you pick the object up, however in C:M 259:1 he says it starts once you see the object
halacha lost-and-found aruch-hashulchan
asked Jun 12 at 3:42
AsherAsher
16011
the A"H in C"M 263:2 says that mitzvas asei of hashavas aveidah(hasheiv teshiveim) applies only once you pick the object up, however in C:M 259:1 he says it starts once you see the object
halacha lost-and-found aruch-hashulchan
halacha lost-and-found aruch-hashulchan
asked Jun 12 at 3:42
AsherAsher
16011
asked Jun 12 at 3:42
AsherAsher
16011
edited Jun 13 at 2:51
Asher
asked Jun 12 at 3:42
AsherAsher
16011
asked Jun 12 at 3:42
AsherAsher
16011
asked Jun 12 at 3:42
AsherAsher
16011
16011
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Asher ending ending at 2019-06-21 03:52:13Z">in 2 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
please look up the aruch hashulchan so you can understand what he is saying
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Asher ending ending at 2019-06-21 03:52:13Z">in 2 days.
This question has not received enough attention.
please look up the aruch hashulchan so you can understand what he is saying
@רבותמחשבות he is talking about all items that you have intent to return
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:55
add a comment |
@רבותמחשבות he is talking about all items that you have intent to return
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:55
@רבותמחשבות he is talking about all items that you have intent to return
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:55
@רבותמחשבות he is talking about all items that you have intent to return
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:55
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
In C:M 259:1 the Aruch haShulchan says it starts once you see the object. However, there are conditions to be met.
For example: In C"M 263:2 he says that mitzvas asei of hashavas aveidah applies even to a dignified personality once he picks it up or moves it. Otherwise, Mr. VIP is exempt.
answered Jun 12 at 9:02
Danny SchoemannDanny Schoemann
35.3k463171
he says the reason why VIP is chayuv once he picks it up is because he was never exempt from that mitzvah, only from the lav, clearly stating that before he picked it up, there was no mitzvah of hasheiv teshiveim a clear contradiction
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:54
@DannySchoemann I think I met Mr. VIP once. Doesn’t it stand for ‘Vacuously Injurious Personality ‘? B-)
– Yaacov Deane
Jun 14 at 13:12
add a comment |
In CM 263.2 the topic treated is the lav "לא תוכל להתעלם". This lav has exceptions when there is a problem of honor. "פעמים שאתה מתעלם, זקו ואינו לפי כבודו". The sugia is in BM 30ab. The same reason that leads us to say "אתה מתעלם" leads us to push out the asse of "השב תשיבם"
If you have already picked up the object, there is still Mitsva "השב תשיבם" despite it was pushed out. Now, you must report it to the owner. This mitsva still exists but was pushed out. If you make the choice to make it by beginning to return the object to its owner you are now in duty to make it. This is the meaning of the text in Aruch Hashulchan.
The Gemara explains that it is possible to apply the "פעמים שאתה מתעלם", for the same reason the positive mitsva of "השב תשיב" is pushed out. But when he begins to take the object, he decides to make the mitsva of "השב תשיבם". In conclusion, when there is no "לא תוכל להתעלם", there is no obligation to make "השב תשיבם" despite that the mitsva exists. But if, regardless of any obligation he takes it, the Mitsva of "השב תשיבם" comes back. The explanations of the pushing out of this misva are multiple. The main is that a mitsva regarding money laws doesn't push out Isurim. So, Isurim push it out.
The general rule of "השב תשיבם" is explained in 259.1. The two mitsvot are here when he identies the Aveda. That is the line of the Ran from which the Nimuke Yosef is quoted, and the Rambam. The Taz and Aruch Hashulchan follow them. Other poskim as the Sma follow the Ramban who holds that "השב תשיבם" begins from the time he takes the object.
In 259.1 The Aruch Hashulchan says following the Taz quoting the Nimuke Yosef for the Pshat on Gemara 26b.
המתין לה עד שנתיאשו הבעלים ונטלה אינו עובר אלא משום לא תוכל להתעלם בלבד
THe pshat is that because he stands guard next to the object he has still the possibility to make the Mitsva of "השב תשיבם" he doesn't annul it. But when the Yeush occurs, the Mitsva disappears. But if he goes away and doesn't stands guard next to the object, he annul both "השב תשיבם ולא תוכל להתעלם". The proof is from the Gemara 30a quoted below with Rashi.
האי עשה - השב תשיבם
He has a positive Mitsva, Hashev Teshivem. And the question is when he doesn't take the object.
In summary:
for a man who has no obligation of "לא תוכל להתעלם" in a precise case, there is a positive mitsva of "השב תשיבם"but it is pushed out, pushed out.
In a special situation that regardless the lack of "לא תוכל להתעלם" and the pushing out of the asse, he takes the object, he makes the choice to make the asse despite the dechia. The asse comes back.
For a man who has an obligation of "לא תוכל להתעלם", there is immediately a Mitsva of "השב תשיבם".
answered Jun 14 at 11:55
koutykouty
17.7k32149
aren't one and 3 contradictory
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:07
+1. but i dont understand the 3rd paragraph why is there no problem of "hasheiv teshivaim" if he sees it he is chayiv in the mitzvah and he has no petur for that mitzvah
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:11
@Asher fixed...
– kouty
Jun 15 at 18:36
I don't understand you
– kouty
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In C:M 259:1 the Aruch haShulchan says it starts once you see the object. However, there are conditions to be met.
For example: In C"M 263:2 he says that mitzvas asei of hashavas aveidah applies even to a dignified personality once he picks it up or moves it. Otherwise, Mr. VIP is exempt.
answered Jun 12 at 9:02
Danny SchoemannDanny Schoemann
35.3k463171
he says the reason why VIP is chayuv once he picks it up is because he was never exempt from that mitzvah, only from the lav, clearly stating that before he picked it up, there was no mitzvah of hasheiv teshiveim a clear contradiction
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:54
@DannySchoemann I think I met Mr. VIP once. Doesn’t it stand for ‘Vacuously Injurious Personality ‘? B-)
– Yaacov Deane
Jun 14 at 13:12
add a comment |
In C:M 259:1 the Aruch haShulchan says it starts once you see the object. However, there are conditions to be met.
For example: In C"M 263:2 he says that mitzvas asei of hashavas aveidah applies even to a dignified personality once he picks it up or moves it. Otherwise, Mr. VIP is exempt.
answered Jun 12 at 9:02
Danny SchoemannDanny Schoemann
35.3k463171
he says the reason why VIP is chayuv once he picks it up is because he was never exempt from that mitzvah, only from the lav, clearly stating that before he picked it up, there was no mitzvah of hasheiv teshiveim a clear contradiction
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:54
@DannySchoemann I think I met Mr. VIP once. Doesn’t it stand for ‘Vacuously Injurious Personality ‘? B-)
– Yaacov Deane
Jun 14 at 13:12
add a comment |
In C:M 259:1 the Aruch haShulchan says it starts once you see the object. However, there are conditions to be met.
For example: In C"M 263:2 he says that mitzvas asei of hashavas aveidah applies even to a dignified personality once he picks it up or moves it. Otherwise, Mr. VIP is exempt.
answered Jun 12 at 9:02
Danny SchoemannDanny Schoemann
35.3k463171
In C:M 259:1 the Aruch haShulchan says it starts once you see the object. However, there are conditions to be met.
For example: In C"M 263:2 he says that mitzvas asei of hashavas aveidah applies even to a dignified personality once he picks it up or moves it. Otherwise, Mr. VIP is exempt.
answered Jun 12 at 9:02
Danny SchoemannDanny Schoemann
35.3k463171
answered Jun 12 at 9:02
Danny SchoemannDanny Schoemann
35.3k463171
answered Jun 12 at 9:02
Danny SchoemannDanny Schoemann
35.3k463171
answered Jun 12 at 9:02
Danny SchoemannDanny Schoemann
35.3k463171
35.3k463171
he says the reason why VIP is chayuv once he picks it up is because he was never exempt from that mitzvah, only from the lav, clearly stating that before he picked it up, there was no mitzvah of hasheiv teshiveim a clear contradiction
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:54
@DannySchoemann I think I met Mr. VIP once. Doesn’t it stand for ‘Vacuously Injurious Personality ‘? B-)
– Yaacov Deane
Jun 14 at 13:12
add a comment |
he says the reason why VIP is chayuv once he picks it up is because he was never exempt from that mitzvah, only from the lav, clearly stating that before he picked it up, there was no mitzvah of hasheiv teshiveim a clear contradiction
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:54
@DannySchoemann I think I met Mr. VIP once. Doesn’t it stand for ‘Vacuously Injurious Personality ‘? B-)
– Yaacov Deane
Jun 14 at 13:12
he says the reason why VIP is chayuv once he picks it up is because he was never exempt from that mitzvah, only from the lav, clearly stating that before he picked it up, there was no mitzvah of hasheiv teshiveim a clear contradiction
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:54
he says the reason why VIP is chayuv once he picks it up is because he was never exempt from that mitzvah, only from the lav, clearly stating that before he picked it up, there was no mitzvah of hasheiv teshiveim a clear contradiction
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:54
@DannySchoemann I think I met Mr. VIP once. Doesn’t it stand for ‘Vacuously Injurious Personality ‘? B-)
– Yaacov Deane
Jun 14 at 13:12
@DannySchoemann I think I met Mr. VIP once. Doesn’t it stand for ‘Vacuously Injurious Personality ‘? B-)
– Yaacov Deane
Jun 14 at 13:12
add a comment |
In CM 263.2 the topic treated is the lav "לא תוכל להתעלם". This lav has exceptions when there is a problem of honor. "פעמים שאתה מתעלם, זקו ואינו לפי כבודו". The sugia is in BM 30ab. The same reason that leads us to say "אתה מתעלם" leads us to push out the asse of "השב תשיבם"
If you have already picked up the object, there is still Mitsva "השב תשיבם" despite it was pushed out. Now, you must report it to the owner. This mitsva still exists but was pushed out. If you make the choice to make it by beginning to return the object to its owner you are now in duty to make it. This is the meaning of the text in Aruch Hashulchan.
The Gemara explains that it is possible to apply the "פעמים שאתה מתעלם", for the same reason the positive mitsva of "השב תשיב" is pushed out. But when he begins to take the object, he decides to make the mitsva of "השב תשיבם". In conclusion, when there is no "לא תוכל להתעלם", there is no obligation to make "השב תשיבם" despite that the mitsva exists. But if, regardless of any obligation he takes it, the Mitsva of "השב תשיבם" comes back. The explanations of the pushing out of this misva are multiple. The main is that a mitsva regarding money laws doesn't push out Isurim. So, Isurim push it out.
The general rule of "השב תשיבם" is explained in 259.1. The two mitsvot are here when he identies the Aveda. That is the line of the Ran from which the Nimuke Yosef is quoted, and the Rambam. The Taz and Aruch Hashulchan follow them. Other poskim as the Sma follow the Ramban who holds that "השב תשיבם" begins from the time he takes the object.
In 259.1 The Aruch Hashulchan says following the Taz quoting the Nimuke Yosef for the Pshat on Gemara 26b.
המתין לה עד שנתיאשו הבעלים ונטלה אינו עובר אלא משום לא תוכל להתעלם בלבד
THe pshat is that because he stands guard next to the object he has still the possibility to make the Mitsva of "השב תשיבם" he doesn't annul it. But when the Yeush occurs, the Mitsva disappears. But if he goes away and doesn't stands guard next to the object, he annul both "השב תשיבם ולא תוכל להתעלם". The proof is from the Gemara 30a quoted below with Rashi.
האי עשה - השב תשיבם
He has a positive Mitsva, Hashev Teshivem. And the question is when he doesn't take the object.
In summary:
for a man who has no obligation of "לא תוכל להתעלם" in a precise case, there is a positive mitsva of "השב תשיבם"but it is pushed out, pushed out.
In a special situation that regardless the lack of "לא תוכל להתעלם" and the pushing out of the asse, he takes the object, he makes the choice to make the asse despite the dechia. The asse comes back.
For a man who has an obligation of "לא תוכל להתעלם", there is immediately a Mitsva of "השב תשיבם".
answered Jun 14 at 11:55
koutykouty
17.7k32149
aren't one and 3 contradictory
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:07
+1. but i dont understand the 3rd paragraph why is there no problem of "hasheiv teshivaim" if he sees it he is chayiv in the mitzvah and he has no petur for that mitzvah
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:11
@Asher fixed...
– kouty
Jun 15 at 18:36
I don't understand you
– kouty
2 days ago
add a comment |
In CM 263.2 the topic treated is the lav "לא תוכל להתעלם". This lav has exceptions when there is a problem of honor. "פעמים שאתה מתעלם, זקו ואינו לפי כבודו". The sugia is in BM 30ab. The same reason that leads us to say "אתה מתעלם" leads us to push out the asse of "השב תשיבם"
If you have already picked up the object, there is still Mitsva "השב תשיבם" despite it was pushed out. Now, you must report it to the owner. This mitsva still exists but was pushed out. If you make the choice to make it by beginning to return the object to its owner you are now in duty to make it. This is the meaning of the text in Aruch Hashulchan.
The Gemara explains that it is possible to apply the "פעמים שאתה מתעלם", for the same reason the positive mitsva of "השב תשיב" is pushed out. But when he begins to take the object, he decides to make the mitsva of "השב תשיבם". In conclusion, when there is no "לא תוכל להתעלם", there is no obligation to make "השב תשיבם" despite that the mitsva exists. But if, regardless of any obligation he takes it, the Mitsva of "השב תשיבם" comes back. The explanations of the pushing out of this misva are multiple. The main is that a mitsva regarding money laws doesn't push out Isurim. So, Isurim push it out.
The general rule of "השב תשיבם" is explained in 259.1. The two mitsvot are here when he identies the Aveda. That is the line of the Ran from which the Nimuke Yosef is quoted, and the Rambam. The Taz and Aruch Hashulchan follow them. Other poskim as the Sma follow the Ramban who holds that "השב תשיבם" begins from the time he takes the object.
In 259.1 The Aruch Hashulchan says following the Taz quoting the Nimuke Yosef for the Pshat on Gemara 26b.
המתין לה עד שנתיאשו הבעלים ונטלה אינו עובר אלא משום לא תוכל להתעלם בלבד
THe pshat is that because he stands guard next to the object he has still the possibility to make the Mitsva of "השב תשיבם" he doesn't annul it. But when the Yeush occurs, the Mitsva disappears. But if he goes away and doesn't stands guard next to the object, he annul both "השב תשיבם ולא תוכל להתעלם". The proof is from the Gemara 30a quoted below with Rashi.
האי עשה - השב תשיבם
He has a positive Mitsva, Hashev Teshivem. And the question is when he doesn't take the object.
In summary:
for a man who has no obligation of "לא תוכל להתעלם" in a precise case, there is a positive mitsva of "השב תשיבם"but it is pushed out, pushed out.
In a special situation that regardless the lack of "לא תוכל להתעלם" and the pushing out of the asse, he takes the object, he makes the choice to make the asse despite the dechia. The asse comes back.
For a man who has an obligation of "לא תוכל להתעלם", there is immediately a Mitsva of "השב תשיבם".
answered Jun 14 at 11:55
koutykouty
17.7k32149
aren't one and 3 contradictory
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:07
+1. but i dont understand the 3rd paragraph why is there no problem of "hasheiv teshivaim" if he sees it he is chayiv in the mitzvah and he has no petur for that mitzvah
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:11
@Asher fixed...
– kouty
Jun 15 at 18:36
I don't understand you
– kouty
2 days ago
add a comment |
In CM 263.2 the topic treated is the lav "לא תוכל להתעלם". This lav has exceptions when there is a problem of honor. "פעמים שאתה מתעלם, זקו ואינו לפי כבודו". The sugia is in BM 30ab. The same reason that leads us to say "אתה מתעלם" leads us to push out the asse of "השב תשיבם"
If you have already picked up the object, there is still Mitsva "השב תשיבם" despite it was pushed out. Now, you must report it to the owner. This mitsva still exists but was pushed out. If you make the choice to make it by beginning to return the object to its owner you are now in duty to make it. This is the meaning of the text in Aruch Hashulchan.
The Gemara explains that it is possible to apply the "פעמים שאתה מתעלם", for the same reason the positive mitsva of "השב תשיב" is pushed out. But when he begins to take the object, he decides to make the mitsva of "השב תשיבם". In conclusion, when there is no "לא תוכל להתעלם", there is no obligation to make "השב תשיבם" despite that the mitsva exists. But if, regardless of any obligation he takes it, the Mitsva of "השב תשיבם" comes back. The explanations of the pushing out of this misva are multiple. The main is that a mitsva regarding money laws doesn't push out Isurim. So, Isurim push it out.
The general rule of "השב תשיבם" is explained in 259.1. The two mitsvot are here when he identies the Aveda. That is the line of the Ran from which the Nimuke Yosef is quoted, and the Rambam. The Taz and Aruch Hashulchan follow them. Other poskim as the Sma follow the Ramban who holds that "השב תשיבם" begins from the time he takes the object.
In 259.1 The Aruch Hashulchan says following the Taz quoting the Nimuke Yosef for the Pshat on Gemara 26b.
המתין לה עד שנתיאשו הבעלים ונטלה אינו עובר אלא משום לא תוכל להתעלם בלבד
THe pshat is that because he stands guard next to the object he has still the possibility to make the Mitsva of "השב תשיבם" he doesn't annul it. But when the Yeush occurs, the Mitsva disappears. But if he goes away and doesn't stands guard next to the object, he annul both "השב תשיבם ולא תוכל להתעלם". The proof is from the Gemara 30a quoted below with Rashi.
האי עשה - השב תשיבם
He has a positive Mitsva, Hashev Teshivem. And the question is when he doesn't take the object.
In summary:
for a man who has no obligation of "לא תוכל להתעלם" in a precise case, there is a positive mitsva of "השב תשיבם"but it is pushed out, pushed out.
In a special situation that regardless the lack of "לא תוכל להתעלם" and the pushing out of the asse, he takes the object, he makes the choice to make the asse despite the dechia. The asse comes back.
For a man who has an obligation of "לא תוכל להתעלם", there is immediately a Mitsva of "השב תשיבם".
answered Jun 14 at 11:55
koutykouty
17.7k32149
In CM 263.2 the topic treated is the lav "לא תוכל להתעלם". This lav has exceptions when there is a problem of honor. "פעמים שאתה מתעלם, זקו ואינו לפי כבודו". The sugia is in BM 30ab. The same reason that leads us to say "אתה מתעלם" leads us to push out the asse of "השב תשיבם"
If you have already picked up the object, there is still Mitsva "השב תשיבם" despite it was pushed out. Now, you must report it to the owner. This mitsva still exists but was pushed out. If you make the choice to make it by beginning to return the object to its owner you are now in duty to make it. This is the meaning of the text in Aruch Hashulchan.
The Gemara explains that it is possible to apply the "פעמים שאתה מתעלם", for the same reason the positive mitsva of "השב תשיב" is pushed out. But when he begins to take the object, he decides to make the mitsva of "השב תשיבם". In conclusion, when there is no "לא תוכל להתעלם", there is no obligation to make "השב תשיבם" despite that the mitsva exists. But if, regardless of any obligation he takes it, the Mitsva of "השב תשיבם" comes back. The explanations of the pushing out of this misva are multiple. The main is that a mitsva regarding money laws doesn't push out Isurim. So, Isurim push it out.
The general rule of "השב תשיבם" is explained in 259.1. The two mitsvot are here when he identies the Aveda. That is the line of the Ran from which the Nimuke Yosef is quoted, and the Rambam. The Taz and Aruch Hashulchan follow them. Other poskim as the Sma follow the Ramban who holds that "השב תשיבם" begins from the time he takes the object.
In 259.1 The Aruch Hashulchan says following the Taz quoting the Nimuke Yosef for the Pshat on Gemara 26b.
המתין לה עד שנתיאשו הבעלים ונטלה אינו עובר אלא משום לא תוכל להתעלם בלבד
THe pshat is that because he stands guard next to the object he has still the possibility to make the Mitsva of "השב תשיבם" he doesn't annul it. But when the Yeush occurs, the Mitsva disappears. But if he goes away and doesn't stands guard next to the object, he annul both "השב תשיבם ולא תוכל להתעלם". The proof is from the Gemara 30a quoted below with Rashi.
האי עשה - השב תשיבם
He has a positive Mitsva, Hashev Teshivem. And the question is when he doesn't take the object.
In summary:
for a man who has no obligation of "לא תוכל להתעלם" in a precise case, there is a positive mitsva of "השב תשיבם"but it is pushed out, pushed out.
In a special situation that regardless the lack of "לא תוכל להתעלם" and the pushing out of the asse, he takes the object, he makes the choice to make the asse despite the dechia. The asse comes back.
For a man who has an obligation of "לא תוכל להתעלם", there is immediately a Mitsva of "השב תשיבם".
answered Jun 14 at 11:55
koutykouty
17.7k32149
edited 2 days ago
answered Jun 14 at 11:55
koutykouty
17.7k32149
answered Jun 14 at 11:55
koutykouty
17.7k32149
answered Jun 14 at 11:55
koutykouty
17.7k32149
17.7k32149
aren't one and 3 contradictory
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:07
+1. but i dont understand the 3rd paragraph why is there no problem of "hasheiv teshivaim" if he sees it he is chayiv in the mitzvah and he has no petur for that mitzvah
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:11
@Asher fixed...
– kouty
Jun 15 at 18:36
I don't understand you
– kouty
2 days ago
add a comment |
aren't one and 3 contradictory
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:07
+1. but i dont understand the 3rd paragraph why is there no problem of "hasheiv teshivaim" if he sees it he is chayiv in the mitzvah and he has no petur for that mitzvah
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:11
@Asher fixed...
– kouty
Jun 15 at 18:36
I don't understand you
– kouty
2 days ago
aren't one and 3 contradictory
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:07
aren't one and 3 contradictory
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:07
+1. but i dont understand the 3rd paragraph why is there no problem of "hasheiv teshivaim" if he sees it he is chayiv in the mitzvah and he has no petur for that mitzvah
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:11
+1. but i dont understand the 3rd paragraph why is there no problem of "hasheiv teshivaim" if he sees it he is chayiv in the mitzvah and he has no petur for that mitzvah
– Asher
Jun 14 at 21:11
@Asher fixed...
– kouty
Jun 15 at 18:36
@Asher fixed...
– kouty
Jun 15 at 18:36
I don't understand you
– kouty
2 days ago
I don't understand you
– kouty
2 days ago
add a comment |
@רבותמחשבות he is talking about all items that you have intent to return
– Asher
Jun 13 at 2:55