How to supress loops in a digraph?Dynamic graph construction and visualization (Watts' “Small Worlds” α-model)LayeredGraphPlot Vertex Spacing / Edge LengthHow can I reduce a directed graph to only its “junctions”?How to generate all Feynman diagrams with Mathematica?How to filter-out edges in a HighlightGraph[] visualization based on VertexCoordinates[]?Completing graph edges “around the world” to GeoPlot an itineraryHopcroft's Algorithm for Minimization of Deterministic Finite State Automaton

Single-key teletype?

How can I end combat quickly when the outcome is inevitable?

Traversing Oceania: A Cryptic Journey

How come the nude protesters were not arrested?

Are there any important biographies of nobodies?

Active low-pass filters --- good to what frequencies?

How is the excise border managed in Ireland?

Who enforces MPAA rating adherence?

Cascading Switches. Will it affect performance?

How to safely destroy (a large quantity of) valid checks?

Overlapping String-Blocks

Can I utilise a baking stone to make crepes?

If I leave the US through an airport, do I have to return through the same airport?

Which languages would be most useful in Europe at the end of the 19th century?

Getting UPS Power from One Room to Another

What is the color of artificial intelligence?

Is an entry level DSLR going to shoot nice portrait pictures?

How do you say "homebrewer" in Spanish?

How can I get an unreasonable manager to approve time off?

Does the Long March-11 increase its thrust after clearing the launch tower?

Let M and N be single-digit integers. If the product 2M5 x 13N is divisible by 36, how many ordered pairs (M,N) are possible?

Is it legal for a bar bouncer to confiscate a fake ID

Has there been a multiethnic Star Trek character?

Does the 2019 UA Artificer's Many-Handed Pouch infusion enable unlimited infinite-range cross-planar communication?



How to supress loops in a digraph?


Dynamic graph construction and visualization (Watts' “Small Worlds” α-model)LayeredGraphPlot Vertex Spacing / Edge LengthHow can I reduce a directed graph to only its “junctions”?How to generate all Feynman diagrams with Mathematica?How to filter-out edges in a HighlightGraph[] visualization based on VertexCoordinates[]?Completing graph edges “around the world” to GeoPlot an itineraryHopcroft's Algorithm for Minimization of Deterministic Finite State Automaton













6












$begingroup$


I have the following Code working nicely (Part of this code has been developed by users in this forum).



Clear[vLabels, selectAbove, subgraphAbove];
mm = RandomReal[0.5, 10, 10];
vLabels = 1 -> AGR, 2 -> FIS, 3 -> CO1, 4 -> CO2, 5 -> MA1, 6 -> MA2,
7 -> EGW, 8 -> CST, 9 -> WHS, 10 -> HOT;

selectAbove[[Theta]_] := BoolEval[[Theta] < mm];
subgraphAbove[[Theta]_] := AdjacencyGraph[selectAbove[[Theta]],
PlotLabel -> [Theta] < Subscript[m, ij], VertexSize -> 0.3,
VertexLabels -> vLabels , ImagePadding -> 20, ImageSize -> 150];
Manipulate[
subgraphAbove[[Theta]], [Theta], 0.001, "Threshold [Theta] <",
0, 0.5, 0.01]


I simply do not want to see the loops in this digraph. I looked for a command to suppress the loops, but to my surprise no single command exists. Or I could find it in my search.



I will appreciate if you suggest me a way to suppress the loops.



  • EDIT 1

I face a puzzle here. The Code given above simply counts the number of edges in an interval theta1 and theta2. If I keep the maximum range to find the maximum number of edges in the entire graph, it gives me a puzzling result. To see the puzzle, let us just look at the following three maps.



The first graph indicates that in the range given, the number of linkages or edges is 136. (Keep in mind that histogram is giving the right and consistent answer.)



enter image description here



The second graph indicates that in the range given, the number of linkages or edges is 271, which is correct. (Keep in mind that histogram is giving the right and consistent answer again.)



The puzzle is that, although I reduce the range, expecting that I will get a smaller number of edges compared to the range covering the entire graph, I receive a larger number that 136.



Can somebody tell me what I am missing here or Mathematica is doing something that I cannot see. The additional puzzle is that Histogram always gives the correct number (I checked it through almost all ranges.) but a simple command EdgeCount does not behave in the expected manner.



See the following full Code to replicate the situation, where the mm matrix is large and hence you may check it with random numbers between 0-0.5:



Clear[selectBetween, subgraphBetween];
selectBetween[[Theta]1_, [Theta]2_] :=
BoolEval[[Theta]1 <= mm <= [Theta]2];
subgraphBetween[[Theta]1_, [Theta]2_] :=
AdjacencyGraph[selectBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2],
PlotLabel -> [Theta]1 <= Subscript[m, ij] <= [Theta]2,
VertexSize -> 0.3, VertexLabels -> vLabels , ImagePadding -> 20,
ImageSize -> 150];
Manipulate[Grid[
"Digraph within the range for " <>
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm],
"Total number of edges in the interval",
"Histogram", subgraphBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2],
EdgeCount[subgraphBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2]],
Histogram[0, binlims =
Range[[Theta]1, [Theta]2, ([Theta]2 - [Theta]1)/
nbars], (EdgeCount[subgraphBetween[##]] & @@@
Partition[binlims, 2, 1] &), LabelingFunction -> Above] //
Transpose
],
[Theta]1, 0.00001,
"Threshold [Theta]1 < " <>
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm], 0.00001, 0.5,
0.005, [Theta]2, 0.0001,
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm] <>
" < Threshold [Theta]2", [Theta]1 + 0.00001, 0.5, 0.005,
nbars, 10, 1, 100, 1
]


enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Extract the AdjacencyMatrix and set the diagonal entries to $0$ then plot a new graph with the edited AdjacencyMatrix.
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    Jun 1 at 2:46
















6












$begingroup$


I have the following Code working nicely (Part of this code has been developed by users in this forum).



Clear[vLabels, selectAbove, subgraphAbove];
mm = RandomReal[0.5, 10, 10];
vLabels = 1 -> AGR, 2 -> FIS, 3 -> CO1, 4 -> CO2, 5 -> MA1, 6 -> MA2,
7 -> EGW, 8 -> CST, 9 -> WHS, 10 -> HOT;

selectAbove[[Theta]_] := BoolEval[[Theta] < mm];
subgraphAbove[[Theta]_] := AdjacencyGraph[selectAbove[[Theta]],
PlotLabel -> [Theta] < Subscript[m, ij], VertexSize -> 0.3,
VertexLabels -> vLabels , ImagePadding -> 20, ImageSize -> 150];
Manipulate[
subgraphAbove[[Theta]], [Theta], 0.001, "Threshold [Theta] <",
0, 0.5, 0.01]


I simply do not want to see the loops in this digraph. I looked for a command to suppress the loops, but to my surprise no single command exists. Or I could find it in my search.



I will appreciate if you suggest me a way to suppress the loops.



  • EDIT 1

I face a puzzle here. The Code given above simply counts the number of edges in an interval theta1 and theta2. If I keep the maximum range to find the maximum number of edges in the entire graph, it gives me a puzzling result. To see the puzzle, let us just look at the following three maps.



The first graph indicates that in the range given, the number of linkages or edges is 136. (Keep in mind that histogram is giving the right and consistent answer.)



enter image description here



The second graph indicates that in the range given, the number of linkages or edges is 271, which is correct. (Keep in mind that histogram is giving the right and consistent answer again.)



The puzzle is that, although I reduce the range, expecting that I will get a smaller number of edges compared to the range covering the entire graph, I receive a larger number that 136.



Can somebody tell me what I am missing here or Mathematica is doing something that I cannot see. The additional puzzle is that Histogram always gives the correct number (I checked it through almost all ranges.) but a simple command EdgeCount does not behave in the expected manner.



See the following full Code to replicate the situation, where the mm matrix is large and hence you may check it with random numbers between 0-0.5:



Clear[selectBetween, subgraphBetween];
selectBetween[[Theta]1_, [Theta]2_] :=
BoolEval[[Theta]1 <= mm <= [Theta]2];
subgraphBetween[[Theta]1_, [Theta]2_] :=
AdjacencyGraph[selectBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2],
PlotLabel -> [Theta]1 <= Subscript[m, ij] <= [Theta]2,
VertexSize -> 0.3, VertexLabels -> vLabels , ImagePadding -> 20,
ImageSize -> 150];
Manipulate[Grid[
"Digraph within the range for " <>
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm],
"Total number of edges in the interval",
"Histogram", subgraphBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2],
EdgeCount[subgraphBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2]],
Histogram[0, binlims =
Range[[Theta]1, [Theta]2, ([Theta]2 - [Theta]1)/
nbars], (EdgeCount[subgraphBetween[##]] & @@@
Partition[binlims, 2, 1] &), LabelingFunction -> Above] //
Transpose
],
[Theta]1, 0.00001,
"Threshold [Theta]1 < " <>
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm], 0.00001, 0.5,
0.005, [Theta]2, 0.0001,
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm] <>
" < Threshold [Theta]2", [Theta]1 + 0.00001, 0.5, 0.005,
nbars, 10, 1, 100, 1
]


enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Extract the AdjacencyMatrix and set the diagonal entries to $0$ then plot a new graph with the edited AdjacencyMatrix.
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    Jun 1 at 2:46














6












6








6


3



$begingroup$


I have the following Code working nicely (Part of this code has been developed by users in this forum).



Clear[vLabels, selectAbove, subgraphAbove];
mm = RandomReal[0.5, 10, 10];
vLabels = 1 -> AGR, 2 -> FIS, 3 -> CO1, 4 -> CO2, 5 -> MA1, 6 -> MA2,
7 -> EGW, 8 -> CST, 9 -> WHS, 10 -> HOT;

selectAbove[[Theta]_] := BoolEval[[Theta] < mm];
subgraphAbove[[Theta]_] := AdjacencyGraph[selectAbove[[Theta]],
PlotLabel -> [Theta] < Subscript[m, ij], VertexSize -> 0.3,
VertexLabels -> vLabels , ImagePadding -> 20, ImageSize -> 150];
Manipulate[
subgraphAbove[[Theta]], [Theta], 0.001, "Threshold [Theta] <",
0, 0.5, 0.01]


I simply do not want to see the loops in this digraph. I looked for a command to suppress the loops, but to my surprise no single command exists. Or I could find it in my search.



I will appreciate if you suggest me a way to suppress the loops.



  • EDIT 1

I face a puzzle here. The Code given above simply counts the number of edges in an interval theta1 and theta2. If I keep the maximum range to find the maximum number of edges in the entire graph, it gives me a puzzling result. To see the puzzle, let us just look at the following three maps.



The first graph indicates that in the range given, the number of linkages or edges is 136. (Keep in mind that histogram is giving the right and consistent answer.)



enter image description here



The second graph indicates that in the range given, the number of linkages or edges is 271, which is correct. (Keep in mind that histogram is giving the right and consistent answer again.)



The puzzle is that, although I reduce the range, expecting that I will get a smaller number of edges compared to the range covering the entire graph, I receive a larger number that 136.



Can somebody tell me what I am missing here or Mathematica is doing something that I cannot see. The additional puzzle is that Histogram always gives the correct number (I checked it through almost all ranges.) but a simple command EdgeCount does not behave in the expected manner.



See the following full Code to replicate the situation, where the mm matrix is large and hence you may check it with random numbers between 0-0.5:



Clear[selectBetween, subgraphBetween];
selectBetween[[Theta]1_, [Theta]2_] :=
BoolEval[[Theta]1 <= mm <= [Theta]2];
subgraphBetween[[Theta]1_, [Theta]2_] :=
AdjacencyGraph[selectBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2],
PlotLabel -> [Theta]1 <= Subscript[m, ij] <= [Theta]2,
VertexSize -> 0.3, VertexLabels -> vLabels , ImagePadding -> 20,
ImageSize -> 150];
Manipulate[Grid[
"Digraph within the range for " <>
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm],
"Total number of edges in the interval",
"Histogram", subgraphBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2],
EdgeCount[subgraphBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2]],
Histogram[0, binlims =
Range[[Theta]1, [Theta]2, ([Theta]2 - [Theta]1)/
nbars], (EdgeCount[subgraphBetween[##]] & @@@
Partition[binlims, 2, 1] &), LabelingFunction -> Above] //
Transpose
],
[Theta]1, 0.00001,
"Threshold [Theta]1 < " <>
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm], 0.00001, 0.5,
0.005, [Theta]2, 0.0001,
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm] <>
" < Threshold [Theta]2", [Theta]1 + 0.00001, 0.5, 0.005,
nbars, 10, 1, 100, 1
]


enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have the following Code working nicely (Part of this code has been developed by users in this forum).



Clear[vLabels, selectAbove, subgraphAbove];
mm = RandomReal[0.5, 10, 10];
vLabels = 1 -> AGR, 2 -> FIS, 3 -> CO1, 4 -> CO2, 5 -> MA1, 6 -> MA2,
7 -> EGW, 8 -> CST, 9 -> WHS, 10 -> HOT;

selectAbove[[Theta]_] := BoolEval[[Theta] < mm];
subgraphAbove[[Theta]_] := AdjacencyGraph[selectAbove[[Theta]],
PlotLabel -> [Theta] < Subscript[m, ij], VertexSize -> 0.3,
VertexLabels -> vLabels , ImagePadding -> 20, ImageSize -> 150];
Manipulate[
subgraphAbove[[Theta]], [Theta], 0.001, "Threshold [Theta] <",
0, 0.5, 0.01]


I simply do not want to see the loops in this digraph. I looked for a command to suppress the loops, but to my surprise no single command exists. Or I could find it in my search.



I will appreciate if you suggest me a way to suppress the loops.



  • EDIT 1

I face a puzzle here. The Code given above simply counts the number of edges in an interval theta1 and theta2. If I keep the maximum range to find the maximum number of edges in the entire graph, it gives me a puzzling result. To see the puzzle, let us just look at the following three maps.



The first graph indicates that in the range given, the number of linkages or edges is 136. (Keep in mind that histogram is giving the right and consistent answer.)



enter image description here



The second graph indicates that in the range given, the number of linkages or edges is 271, which is correct. (Keep in mind that histogram is giving the right and consistent answer again.)



The puzzle is that, although I reduce the range, expecting that I will get a smaller number of edges compared to the range covering the entire graph, I receive a larger number that 136.



Can somebody tell me what I am missing here or Mathematica is doing something that I cannot see. The additional puzzle is that Histogram always gives the correct number (I checked it through almost all ranges.) but a simple command EdgeCount does not behave in the expected manner.



See the following full Code to replicate the situation, where the mm matrix is large and hence you may check it with random numbers between 0-0.5:



Clear[selectBetween, subgraphBetween];
selectBetween[[Theta]1_, [Theta]2_] :=
BoolEval[[Theta]1 <= mm <= [Theta]2];
subgraphBetween[[Theta]1_, [Theta]2_] :=
AdjacencyGraph[selectBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2],
PlotLabel -> [Theta]1 <= Subscript[m, ij] <= [Theta]2,
VertexSize -> 0.3, VertexLabels -> vLabels , ImagePadding -> 20,
ImageSize -> 150];
Manipulate[Grid[
"Digraph within the range for " <>
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm],
"Total number of edges in the interval",
"Histogram", subgraphBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2],
EdgeCount[subgraphBetween[[Theta]1, [Theta]2]],
Histogram[0, binlims =
Range[[Theta]1, [Theta]2, ([Theta]2 - [Theta]1)/
nbars], (EdgeCount[subgraphBetween[##]] & @@@
Partition[binlims, 2, 1] &), LabelingFunction -> Above] //
Transpose
],
[Theta]1, 0.00001,
"Threshold [Theta]1 < " <>
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm], 0.00001, 0.5,
0.005, [Theta]2, 0.0001,
ToString[Subscript[m, ij], TraditionalForm] <>
" < Threshold [Theta]2", [Theta]1 + 0.00001, 0.5, 0.005,
nbars, 10, 1, 100, 1
]


enter image description here







graphs-and-networks






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 1 at 16:45







Tugrul Temel

















asked Jun 1 at 1:48









Tugrul TemelTugrul Temel

1,014213




1,014213







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Extract the AdjacencyMatrix and set the diagonal entries to $0$ then plot a new graph with the edited AdjacencyMatrix.
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    Jun 1 at 2:46













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Extract the AdjacencyMatrix and set the diagonal entries to $0$ then plot a new graph with the edited AdjacencyMatrix.
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    Jun 1 at 2:46








2




2




$begingroup$
Extract the AdjacencyMatrix and set the diagonal entries to $0$ then plot a new graph with the edited AdjacencyMatrix.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
Jun 1 at 2:46





$begingroup$
Extract the AdjacencyMatrix and set the diagonal entries to $0$ then plot a new graph with the edited AdjacencyMatrix.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
Jun 1 at 2:46











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

Use SimpleGraph:




SimpleGraph[g] removes all self-loops and multiple edges between the same vertices.




Manipulate[SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[θ], ImageSize -> Medium, Options[g]], 
θ, 0.001, "Threshold θ <", 0, 0.5, 0.01, Alignment -> Center]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much. It works but somehow it removes the vertex names from the graph. I like to preserve the vertex names if possible.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 10:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Tugrul, you can use SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[[Theta]], Options[g]] to retain the options of subgraphAbove[[Theta]] in SimpleGraph.
    $endgroup$
    – kglr
    Jun 1 at 11:35










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, finally, I got it and it works in the way I wanted. Thank you very much.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 11:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TugrulTemel Beware that just transferring Options[graph] is not a robust solution. It won't work if the graph has edge properties (e.g. edge weights) as some edges are removed.
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    Jun 1 at 14:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For your case the best solution is to zero out the diagonal of the matrix before creating the graph (I updated my answer)
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    Jun 1 at 14:56


















6












$begingroup$

As others said, SimpleGraph will remove both loops and multi-edges. Often this is all you need. If you need to control the removal of loops and multi-edges separately, you can use IGSimpleGraph from IGraph/M.



Create a graph.



g = IGShorthand["1->2->3->1->2->2->1", 
MultiEdges -> True, SelfLoops -> True]


enter image description here



Make the graph simple.



IGSimpleGraph[g]


enter image description here



Preserve self-loops, but not parallel edges.



IGSimpleGraph[g, SelfLoops -> True]


enter image description here



IGSimpleGraph[g, MultiEdges -> True]


Preserve parallel edges but not self-loops.



enter image description here




IGSimpleGraph does not currently preserve graph properties such as egde weights (SimpleGraph does, but only in M12.0+). IGraph/M also provides IGWeightedSimpleGraph which takes the same options, but preserves edge weights, the most commonly needed edge property.




You could also use EdgeDelete to remove self-loops. In a directed graph, use



EdgeDelete[g, x_ [DirectedEdge] x_]


In M11.3 and earlier, EdgeDelete was buggy and would often break the graph if it had properties (styling also counts as properties). In M12.0 it is finally fixed, therefore I can finally recommend it (for M12.0+ only!)




Another option, which is specific to your setup, is to remove the diagonal of the adjacency matrix before using AdjacencyGraph. You can do this using IGZeroDiagonal[matrix] (which is also part of IGraph/M).




Finally, if you have an already constructed graph with properties (such as vertex labels), you need to preserve the properties, and you have Mathematica 11.3 or earlier, then you can use IGTakeSubgraph.



sg = subgraphAbove[.23];

IGTakeSubgraph[sg, DeleteCases[EdgeList[sg], x_ [DirectedEdge] x_]]


enter image description here



The second argument of IGTakeSubgraph can be a set of edges, or a graph. It will keep only those edges from the input graph (the first argument). IGTakeSubgraph is quite slow, but it's the most convenient way to take a subgraph and preserve properties in Mathematica 11.3 and earlier. In Mathematica 12.0 and later, the built-in Subgraph, VertexDelete and EdgeDelete already preserve properties.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It works but IGSimpleGraph remove the vertex names also. SimpleGraph removes the names too. I like to keep them as they are if possible.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 10:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TugrulTemel SimpleGraph does not remove them in Mathematica 12.0 (finally!!)
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    Jun 1 at 14:25










  • $begingroup$
    I have Math 11. @klrg suggested a solution for this issue. I want to thank you all for your time and help.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 14:46


















3












$begingroup$

myGraph = Graph[1 -> 2, 1 -> 3, 2 -> 3, 2 -> 2]


enter image description here



fixedMatrix = 
Table[If[i == j, 0, AdjacencyMatrix[myGraph][[i, j]]],
i, 1, 3,
j, 1, 3];

AdjacencyGraph[fixedMatrix]


enter image description here



Could also use:



fixedMatrix = 
ReplacePart[AdjacencyMatrix[myGraph], Table[i, i -> 0, i, 1, 3]]


Or



SimpleGraph[myGraph]





share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199492%2fhow-to-supress-loops-in-a-digraph%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9












    $begingroup$

    Use SimpleGraph:




    SimpleGraph[g] removes all self-loops and multiple edges between the same vertices.




    Manipulate[SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[θ], ImageSize -> Medium, Options[g]], 
    θ, 0.001, "Threshold θ <", 0, 0.5, 0.01, Alignment -> Center]


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much. It works but somehow it removes the vertex names from the graph. I like to preserve the vertex names if possible.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 10:47






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Tugrul, you can use SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[[Theta]], Options[g]] to retain the options of subgraphAbove[[Theta]] in SimpleGraph.
      $endgroup$
      – kglr
      Jun 1 at 11:35










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, finally, I got it and it works in the way I wanted. Thank you very much.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 11:56






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @TugrulTemel Beware that just transferring Options[graph] is not a robust solution. It won't work if the graph has edge properties (e.g. edge weights) as some edges are removed.
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:55






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      For your case the best solution is to zero out the diagonal of the matrix before creating the graph (I updated my answer)
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:56















    9












    $begingroup$

    Use SimpleGraph:




    SimpleGraph[g] removes all self-loops and multiple edges between the same vertices.




    Manipulate[SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[θ], ImageSize -> Medium, Options[g]], 
    θ, 0.001, "Threshold θ <", 0, 0.5, 0.01, Alignment -> Center]


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much. It works but somehow it removes the vertex names from the graph. I like to preserve the vertex names if possible.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 10:47






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Tugrul, you can use SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[[Theta]], Options[g]] to retain the options of subgraphAbove[[Theta]] in SimpleGraph.
      $endgroup$
      – kglr
      Jun 1 at 11:35










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, finally, I got it and it works in the way I wanted. Thank you very much.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 11:56






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @TugrulTemel Beware that just transferring Options[graph] is not a robust solution. It won't work if the graph has edge properties (e.g. edge weights) as some edges are removed.
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:55






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      For your case the best solution is to zero out the diagonal of the matrix before creating the graph (I updated my answer)
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:56













    9












    9








    9





    $begingroup$

    Use SimpleGraph:




    SimpleGraph[g] removes all self-loops and multiple edges between the same vertices.




    Manipulate[SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[θ], ImageSize -> Medium, Options[g]], 
    θ, 0.001, "Threshold θ <", 0, 0.5, 0.01, Alignment -> Center]


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Use SimpleGraph:




    SimpleGraph[g] removes all self-loops and multiple edges between the same vertices.




    Manipulate[SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[θ], ImageSize -> Medium, Options[g]], 
    θ, 0.001, "Threshold θ <", 0, 0.5, 0.01, Alignment -> Center]


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jun 1 at 12:01

























    answered Jun 1 at 2:57









    kglrkglr

    197k10220442




    197k10220442











    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much. It works but somehow it removes the vertex names from the graph. I like to preserve the vertex names if possible.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 10:47






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Tugrul, you can use SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[[Theta]], Options[g]] to retain the options of subgraphAbove[[Theta]] in SimpleGraph.
      $endgroup$
      – kglr
      Jun 1 at 11:35










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, finally, I got it and it works in the way I wanted. Thank you very much.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 11:56






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @TugrulTemel Beware that just transferring Options[graph] is not a robust solution. It won't work if the graph has edge properties (e.g. edge weights) as some edges are removed.
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:55






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      For your case the best solution is to zero out the diagonal of the matrix before creating the graph (I updated my answer)
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:56
















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much. It works but somehow it removes the vertex names from the graph. I like to preserve the vertex names if possible.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 10:47






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Tugrul, you can use SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[[Theta]], Options[g]] to retain the options of subgraphAbove[[Theta]] in SimpleGraph.
      $endgroup$
      – kglr
      Jun 1 at 11:35










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, finally, I got it and it works in the way I wanted. Thank you very much.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 11:56






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @TugrulTemel Beware that just transferring Options[graph] is not a robust solution. It won't work if the graph has edge properties (e.g. edge weights) as some edges are removed.
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:55






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      For your case the best solution is to zero out the diagonal of the matrix before creating the graph (I updated my answer)
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:56















    $begingroup$
    Thank you very much. It works but somehow it removes the vertex names from the graph. I like to preserve the vertex names if possible.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 10:47




    $begingroup$
    Thank you very much. It works but somehow it removes the vertex names from the graph. I like to preserve the vertex names if possible.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 10:47




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @Tugrul, you can use SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[[Theta]], Options[g]] to retain the options of subgraphAbove[[Theta]] in SimpleGraph.
    $endgroup$
    – kglr
    Jun 1 at 11:35




    $begingroup$
    @Tugrul, you can use SimpleGraph[g = subgraphAbove[[Theta]], Options[g]] to retain the options of subgraphAbove[[Theta]] in SimpleGraph.
    $endgroup$
    – kglr
    Jun 1 at 11:35












    $begingroup$
    Yes, finally, I got it and it works in the way I wanted. Thank you very much.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 11:56




    $begingroup$
    Yes, finally, I got it and it works in the way I wanted. Thank you very much.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 11:56




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @TugrulTemel Beware that just transferring Options[graph] is not a robust solution. It won't work if the graph has edge properties (e.g. edge weights) as some edges are removed.
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    Jun 1 at 14:55




    $begingroup$
    @TugrulTemel Beware that just transferring Options[graph] is not a robust solution. It won't work if the graph has edge properties (e.g. edge weights) as some edges are removed.
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    Jun 1 at 14:55




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    For your case the best solution is to zero out the diagonal of the matrix before creating the graph (I updated my answer)
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    Jun 1 at 14:56




    $begingroup$
    For your case the best solution is to zero out the diagonal of the matrix before creating the graph (I updated my answer)
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    Jun 1 at 14:56











    6












    $begingroup$

    As others said, SimpleGraph will remove both loops and multi-edges. Often this is all you need. If you need to control the removal of loops and multi-edges separately, you can use IGSimpleGraph from IGraph/M.



    Create a graph.



    g = IGShorthand["1->2->3->1->2->2->1", 
    MultiEdges -> True, SelfLoops -> True]


    enter image description here



    Make the graph simple.



    IGSimpleGraph[g]


    enter image description here



    Preserve self-loops, but not parallel edges.



    IGSimpleGraph[g, SelfLoops -> True]


    enter image description here



    IGSimpleGraph[g, MultiEdges -> True]


    Preserve parallel edges but not self-loops.



    enter image description here




    IGSimpleGraph does not currently preserve graph properties such as egde weights (SimpleGraph does, but only in M12.0+). IGraph/M also provides IGWeightedSimpleGraph which takes the same options, but preserves edge weights, the most commonly needed edge property.




    You could also use EdgeDelete to remove self-loops. In a directed graph, use



    EdgeDelete[g, x_ [DirectedEdge] x_]


    In M11.3 and earlier, EdgeDelete was buggy and would often break the graph if it had properties (styling also counts as properties). In M12.0 it is finally fixed, therefore I can finally recommend it (for M12.0+ only!)




    Another option, which is specific to your setup, is to remove the diagonal of the adjacency matrix before using AdjacencyGraph. You can do this using IGZeroDiagonal[matrix] (which is also part of IGraph/M).




    Finally, if you have an already constructed graph with properties (such as vertex labels), you need to preserve the properties, and you have Mathematica 11.3 or earlier, then you can use IGTakeSubgraph.



    sg = subgraphAbove[.23];

    IGTakeSubgraph[sg, DeleteCases[EdgeList[sg], x_ [DirectedEdge] x_]]


    enter image description here



    The second argument of IGTakeSubgraph can be a set of edges, or a graph. It will keep only those edges from the input graph (the first argument). IGTakeSubgraph is quite slow, but it's the most convenient way to take a subgraph and preserve properties in Mathematica 11.3 and earlier. In Mathematica 12.0 and later, the built-in Subgraph, VertexDelete and EdgeDelete already preserve properties.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      It works but IGSimpleGraph remove the vertex names also. SimpleGraph removes the names too. I like to keep them as they are if possible.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 10:49






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @TugrulTemel SimpleGraph does not remove them in Mathematica 12.0 (finally!!)
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:25










    • $begingroup$
      I have Math 11. @klrg suggested a solution for this issue. I want to thank you all for your time and help.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 14:46















    6












    $begingroup$

    As others said, SimpleGraph will remove both loops and multi-edges. Often this is all you need. If you need to control the removal of loops and multi-edges separately, you can use IGSimpleGraph from IGraph/M.



    Create a graph.



    g = IGShorthand["1->2->3->1->2->2->1", 
    MultiEdges -> True, SelfLoops -> True]


    enter image description here



    Make the graph simple.



    IGSimpleGraph[g]


    enter image description here



    Preserve self-loops, but not parallel edges.



    IGSimpleGraph[g, SelfLoops -> True]


    enter image description here



    IGSimpleGraph[g, MultiEdges -> True]


    Preserve parallel edges but not self-loops.



    enter image description here




    IGSimpleGraph does not currently preserve graph properties such as egde weights (SimpleGraph does, but only in M12.0+). IGraph/M also provides IGWeightedSimpleGraph which takes the same options, but preserves edge weights, the most commonly needed edge property.




    You could also use EdgeDelete to remove self-loops. In a directed graph, use



    EdgeDelete[g, x_ [DirectedEdge] x_]


    In M11.3 and earlier, EdgeDelete was buggy and would often break the graph if it had properties (styling also counts as properties). In M12.0 it is finally fixed, therefore I can finally recommend it (for M12.0+ only!)




    Another option, which is specific to your setup, is to remove the diagonal of the adjacency matrix before using AdjacencyGraph. You can do this using IGZeroDiagonal[matrix] (which is also part of IGraph/M).




    Finally, if you have an already constructed graph with properties (such as vertex labels), you need to preserve the properties, and you have Mathematica 11.3 or earlier, then you can use IGTakeSubgraph.



    sg = subgraphAbove[.23];

    IGTakeSubgraph[sg, DeleteCases[EdgeList[sg], x_ [DirectedEdge] x_]]


    enter image description here



    The second argument of IGTakeSubgraph can be a set of edges, or a graph. It will keep only those edges from the input graph (the first argument). IGTakeSubgraph is quite slow, but it's the most convenient way to take a subgraph and preserve properties in Mathematica 11.3 and earlier. In Mathematica 12.0 and later, the built-in Subgraph, VertexDelete and EdgeDelete already preserve properties.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      It works but IGSimpleGraph remove the vertex names also. SimpleGraph removes the names too. I like to keep them as they are if possible.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 10:49






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @TugrulTemel SimpleGraph does not remove them in Mathematica 12.0 (finally!!)
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:25










    • $begingroup$
      I have Math 11. @klrg suggested a solution for this issue. I want to thank you all for your time and help.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 14:46













    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    As others said, SimpleGraph will remove both loops and multi-edges. Often this is all you need. If you need to control the removal of loops and multi-edges separately, you can use IGSimpleGraph from IGraph/M.



    Create a graph.



    g = IGShorthand["1->2->3->1->2->2->1", 
    MultiEdges -> True, SelfLoops -> True]


    enter image description here



    Make the graph simple.



    IGSimpleGraph[g]


    enter image description here



    Preserve self-loops, but not parallel edges.



    IGSimpleGraph[g, SelfLoops -> True]


    enter image description here



    IGSimpleGraph[g, MultiEdges -> True]


    Preserve parallel edges but not self-loops.



    enter image description here




    IGSimpleGraph does not currently preserve graph properties such as egde weights (SimpleGraph does, but only in M12.0+). IGraph/M also provides IGWeightedSimpleGraph which takes the same options, but preserves edge weights, the most commonly needed edge property.




    You could also use EdgeDelete to remove self-loops. In a directed graph, use



    EdgeDelete[g, x_ [DirectedEdge] x_]


    In M11.3 and earlier, EdgeDelete was buggy and would often break the graph if it had properties (styling also counts as properties). In M12.0 it is finally fixed, therefore I can finally recommend it (for M12.0+ only!)




    Another option, which is specific to your setup, is to remove the diagonal of the adjacency matrix before using AdjacencyGraph. You can do this using IGZeroDiagonal[matrix] (which is also part of IGraph/M).




    Finally, if you have an already constructed graph with properties (such as vertex labels), you need to preserve the properties, and you have Mathematica 11.3 or earlier, then you can use IGTakeSubgraph.



    sg = subgraphAbove[.23];

    IGTakeSubgraph[sg, DeleteCases[EdgeList[sg], x_ [DirectedEdge] x_]]


    enter image description here



    The second argument of IGTakeSubgraph can be a set of edges, or a graph. It will keep only those edges from the input graph (the first argument). IGTakeSubgraph is quite slow, but it's the most convenient way to take a subgraph and preserve properties in Mathematica 11.3 and earlier. In Mathematica 12.0 and later, the built-in Subgraph, VertexDelete and EdgeDelete already preserve properties.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    As others said, SimpleGraph will remove both loops and multi-edges. Often this is all you need. If you need to control the removal of loops and multi-edges separately, you can use IGSimpleGraph from IGraph/M.



    Create a graph.



    g = IGShorthand["1->2->3->1->2->2->1", 
    MultiEdges -> True, SelfLoops -> True]


    enter image description here



    Make the graph simple.



    IGSimpleGraph[g]


    enter image description here



    Preserve self-loops, but not parallel edges.



    IGSimpleGraph[g, SelfLoops -> True]


    enter image description here



    IGSimpleGraph[g, MultiEdges -> True]


    Preserve parallel edges but not self-loops.



    enter image description here




    IGSimpleGraph does not currently preserve graph properties such as egde weights (SimpleGraph does, but only in M12.0+). IGraph/M also provides IGWeightedSimpleGraph which takes the same options, but preserves edge weights, the most commonly needed edge property.




    You could also use EdgeDelete to remove self-loops. In a directed graph, use



    EdgeDelete[g, x_ [DirectedEdge] x_]


    In M11.3 and earlier, EdgeDelete was buggy and would often break the graph if it had properties (styling also counts as properties). In M12.0 it is finally fixed, therefore I can finally recommend it (for M12.0+ only!)




    Another option, which is specific to your setup, is to remove the diagonal of the adjacency matrix before using AdjacencyGraph. You can do this using IGZeroDiagonal[matrix] (which is also part of IGraph/M).




    Finally, if you have an already constructed graph with properties (such as vertex labels), you need to preserve the properties, and you have Mathematica 11.3 or earlier, then you can use IGTakeSubgraph.



    sg = subgraphAbove[.23];

    IGTakeSubgraph[sg, DeleteCases[EdgeList[sg], x_ [DirectedEdge] x_]]


    enter image description here



    The second argument of IGTakeSubgraph can be a set of edges, or a graph. It will keep only those edges from the input graph (the first argument). IGTakeSubgraph is quite slow, but it's the most convenient way to take a subgraph and preserve properties in Mathematica 11.3 and earlier. In Mathematica 12.0 and later, the built-in Subgraph, VertexDelete and EdgeDelete already preserve properties.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jun 1 at 14:31

























    answered Jun 1 at 6:30









    SzabolcsSzabolcs

    168k17460974




    168k17460974











    • $begingroup$
      It works but IGSimpleGraph remove the vertex names also. SimpleGraph removes the names too. I like to keep them as they are if possible.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 10:49






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @TugrulTemel SimpleGraph does not remove them in Mathematica 12.0 (finally!!)
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:25










    • $begingroup$
      I have Math 11. @klrg suggested a solution for this issue. I want to thank you all for your time and help.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 14:46
















    • $begingroup$
      It works but IGSimpleGraph remove the vertex names also. SimpleGraph removes the names too. I like to keep them as they are if possible.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 10:49






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @TugrulTemel SimpleGraph does not remove them in Mathematica 12.0 (finally!!)
      $endgroup$
      – Szabolcs
      Jun 1 at 14:25










    • $begingroup$
      I have Math 11. @klrg suggested a solution for this issue. I want to thank you all for your time and help.
      $endgroup$
      – Tugrul Temel
      Jun 1 at 14:46















    $begingroup$
    It works but IGSimpleGraph remove the vertex names also. SimpleGraph removes the names too. I like to keep them as they are if possible.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 10:49




    $begingroup$
    It works but IGSimpleGraph remove the vertex names also. SimpleGraph removes the names too. I like to keep them as they are if possible.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 10:49




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @TugrulTemel SimpleGraph does not remove them in Mathematica 12.0 (finally!!)
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    Jun 1 at 14:25




    $begingroup$
    @TugrulTemel SimpleGraph does not remove them in Mathematica 12.0 (finally!!)
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    Jun 1 at 14:25












    $begingroup$
    I have Math 11. @klrg suggested a solution for this issue. I want to thank you all for your time and help.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 14:46




    $begingroup$
    I have Math 11. @klrg suggested a solution for this issue. I want to thank you all for your time and help.
    $endgroup$
    – Tugrul Temel
    Jun 1 at 14:46











    3












    $begingroup$

    myGraph = Graph[1 -> 2, 1 -> 3, 2 -> 3, 2 -> 2]


    enter image description here



    fixedMatrix = 
    Table[If[i == j, 0, AdjacencyMatrix[myGraph][[i, j]]],
    i, 1, 3,
    j, 1, 3];

    AdjacencyGraph[fixedMatrix]


    enter image description here



    Could also use:



    fixedMatrix = 
    ReplacePart[AdjacencyMatrix[myGraph], Table[i, i -> 0, i, 1, 3]]


    Or



    SimpleGraph[myGraph]





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      myGraph = Graph[1 -> 2, 1 -> 3, 2 -> 3, 2 -> 2]


      enter image description here



      fixedMatrix = 
      Table[If[i == j, 0, AdjacencyMatrix[myGraph][[i, j]]],
      i, 1, 3,
      j, 1, 3];

      AdjacencyGraph[fixedMatrix]


      enter image description here



      Could also use:



      fixedMatrix = 
      ReplacePart[AdjacencyMatrix[myGraph], Table[i, i -> 0, i, 1, 3]]


      Or



      SimpleGraph[myGraph]





      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        myGraph = Graph[1 -> 2, 1 -> 3, 2 -> 3, 2 -> 2]


        enter image description here



        fixedMatrix = 
        Table[If[i == j, 0, AdjacencyMatrix[myGraph][[i, j]]],
        i, 1, 3,
        j, 1, 3];

        AdjacencyGraph[fixedMatrix]


        enter image description here



        Could also use:



        fixedMatrix = 
        ReplacePart[AdjacencyMatrix[myGraph], Table[i, i -> 0, i, 1, 3]]


        Or



        SimpleGraph[myGraph]





        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        myGraph = Graph[1 -> 2, 1 -> 3, 2 -> 3, 2 -> 2]


        enter image description here



        fixedMatrix = 
        Table[If[i == j, 0, AdjacencyMatrix[myGraph][[i, j]]],
        i, 1, 3,
        j, 1, 3];

        AdjacencyGraph[fixedMatrix]


        enter image description here



        Could also use:



        fixedMatrix = 
        ReplacePart[AdjacencyMatrix[myGraph], Table[i, i -> 0, i, 1, 3]]


        Or



        SimpleGraph[myGraph]






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jun 1 at 2:59

























        answered Jun 1 at 2:54









        David G. StorkDavid G. Stork

        25.4k22256




        25.4k22256



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199492%2fhow-to-supress-loops-in-a-digraph%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?