How to take photos with a yellowish tone and point-and-shoot film camera look?Why does my old Quantaray flash not work on my newer Canon DSLR?Canon camera body namesCanon Film SLR 28-80 mm lens with sunfilter; what should be my aperture settings and distanceHow to take Black and White photos without pure black?Flash raises but the camera thinks it doesn'tWhat is causing this pattern of horizontal and vertical lines in my pictures?How do I get a black background with flash?Why is my single test image much brighter than our Stackshot image output?What could cause this black shape on the photo?Can a DSLR take a better photo (less blurry and less noisy) of artworks than a Point and Shoot Camera (Nikon B500)?
Singing along to guitar chords (harmony)
Does the Distant Spell metamagic apply to the Sword Burst cantrip?
Is it OK to bottle condition using previously contaminated bottles?
Could Sauron have read Tom Bombadil's mind if Tom had held the Palantir?
Fitting a mixture of two normal distributions for a data set?
What determines the "strength of impact" of a falling object on the ground, momentum or energy?
Why is Madam Hooch not a professor?
Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?
How can I convince my reader that I will not use a certain trope?
Calculating the partial sum of a expl3 sequence
Do equal angles necessarily mean a polygon is regular?
How should I behave to assure my friends that I am not after their money?
Transition from ascending to descending a rope
Swapping rooks in a 4x4 board
Does anycast addressing add additional latency in any way?
How can Charles Proxy change settings without admin rights after first time?
When is it ok to add filler to a story?
Short story with brother-sister conjoined twins as protagonists?
How to append a matrix element by element?
Are Finite Automata Turing Complete?
Does squid ink pasta bleed?
Why does the A-4 Skyhawk sit nose-up when on ground?
Cascading Repair Costs following Blown Head Gasket on a 2004 Subaru Outback
Declining an offer to present a poster instead of a paper
How to take photos with a yellowish tone and point-and-shoot film camera look?
Why does my old Quantaray flash not work on my newer Canon DSLR?Canon camera body namesCanon Film SLR 28-80 mm lens with sunfilter; what should be my aperture settings and distanceHow to take Black and White photos without pure black?Flash raises but the camera thinks it doesn'tWhat is causing this pattern of horizontal and vertical lines in my pictures?How do I get a black background with flash?Why is my single test image much brighter than our Stackshot image output?What could cause this black shape on the photo?Can a DSLR take a better photo (less blurry and less noisy) of artworks than a Point and Shoot Camera (Nikon B500)?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I have a Canon EOS Rebel T6 and want to emulate the look of these pictures with my flash.
The photographer is astrortiz on Instagram. He also uses a Canon DSLR. Most were taken with flash. They have a yellowish tone, and the clouds look clear. They look like someone took them with a film camera.
How can I take pictures like these? How to get the same style?
canon
edited Jun 17 at 1:09
xiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
asked Jun 16 at 14:46
CorruptedCorrupted
91 bronze badge
New contributor
Corrupted is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 3 more comments
I have a Canon EOS Rebel T6 and want to emulate the look of these pictures with my flash.
The photographer is astrortiz on Instagram. He also uses a Canon DSLR. Most were taken with flash. They have a yellowish tone, and the clouds look clear. They look like someone took them with a film camera.
How can I take pictures like these? How to get the same style?
canon
edited Jun 17 at 1:09
xiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
asked Jun 16 at 14:46
CorruptedCorrupted
91 bronze badge
New contributor
Corrupted is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
This is all a photography site, so "photography question" is not very useful as a title. I tried to make a more descriptive one — please correct if that's not right.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:01
Also, you ask about getting the sky to "look like that" in "some of the pictures". It will help us help you if you are more specific about that (and about what you want to replicate here in general.) Please read Important information for asking "What's this effect?" questions and edit this post accordingly.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:02
And finally :) you've tagged this "canon". Do you know that these images where taken with a Canon DSLR, or do you have a Canon DSLR you wish to use to replicate them with, or something else?
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:03
I didn’t know what title to think about cause I didn’t think the title was that important is my first time using this site to ask for questions but yes this pictures were taken with a canon camera and if you look at the first picture.Do you see how the sky looks how u can see the clouds clear and how it has a different type of look . It was taken with a flash too . I just want to know how I can get the same look from the first picture with my canon camera. It looks more like if someone took them with a film camera
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 15:11
2
I don't know what "a different type of look" is. Different from what? I'm not trying to be difficult here — we just can't read your mind and see what you want so the more descriptive you can be the better!
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:28
|
show 3 more comments
I have a Canon EOS Rebel T6 and want to emulate the look of these pictures with my flash.
The photographer is astrortiz on Instagram. He also uses a Canon DSLR. Most were taken with flash. They have a yellowish tone, and the clouds look clear. They look like someone took them with a film camera.
How can I take pictures like these? How to get the same style?
canon
edited Jun 17 at 1:09
xiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
asked Jun 16 at 14:46
CorruptedCorrupted
91 bronze badge
New contributor
Corrupted is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I have a Canon EOS Rebel T6 and want to emulate the look of these pictures with my flash.
The photographer is astrortiz on Instagram. He also uses a Canon DSLR. Most were taken with flash. They have a yellowish tone, and the clouds look clear. They look like someone took them with a film camera.
How can I take pictures like these? How to get the same style?
canon
canon
edited Jun 17 at 1:09
xiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
asked Jun 16 at 14:46
CorruptedCorrupted
91 bronze badge
New contributor
Corrupted is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Jun 17 at 1:09
xiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
asked Jun 16 at 14:46
CorruptedCorrupted
91 bronze badge
New contributor
Corrupted is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Jun 17 at 1:09
xiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
edited Jun 17 at 1:09
xiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
edited Jun 17 at 1:09
xiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
asked Jun 16 at 14:46
CorruptedCorrupted
91 bronze badge
New contributor
Corrupted is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jun 16 at 14:46
CorruptedCorrupted
91 bronze badge
asked Jun 16 at 14:46
CorruptedCorrupted
91 bronze badge
91 bronze badge
New contributor
Corrupted is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Corrupted is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
This is all a photography site, so "photography question" is not very useful as a title. I tried to make a more descriptive one — please correct if that's not right.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:01
Also, you ask about getting the sky to "look like that" in "some of the pictures". It will help us help you if you are more specific about that (and about what you want to replicate here in general.) Please read Important information for asking "What's this effect?" questions and edit this post accordingly.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:02
And finally :) you've tagged this "canon". Do you know that these images where taken with a Canon DSLR, or do you have a Canon DSLR you wish to use to replicate them with, or something else?
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:03
I didn’t know what title to think about cause I didn’t think the title was that important is my first time using this site to ask for questions but yes this pictures were taken with a canon camera and if you look at the first picture.Do you see how the sky looks how u can see the clouds clear and how it has a different type of look . It was taken with a flash too . I just want to know how I can get the same look from the first picture with my canon camera. It looks more like if someone took them with a film camera
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 15:11
2
I don't know what "a different type of look" is. Different from what? I'm not trying to be difficult here — we just can't read your mind and see what you want so the more descriptive you can be the better!
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:28
|
show 3 more comments
2
This is all a photography site, so "photography question" is not very useful as a title. I tried to make a more descriptive one — please correct if that's not right.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:01
Also, you ask about getting the sky to "look like that" in "some of the pictures". It will help us help you if you are more specific about that (and about what you want to replicate here in general.) Please read Important information for asking "What's this effect?" questions and edit this post accordingly.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:02
And finally :) you've tagged this "canon". Do you know that these images where taken with a Canon DSLR, or do you have a Canon DSLR you wish to use to replicate them with, or something else?
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:03
I didn’t know what title to think about cause I didn’t think the title was that important is my first time using this site to ask for questions but yes this pictures were taken with a canon camera and if you look at the first picture.Do you see how the sky looks how u can see the clouds clear and how it has a different type of look . It was taken with a flash too . I just want to know how I can get the same look from the first picture with my canon camera. It looks more like if someone took them with a film camera
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 15:11
2
I don't know what "a different type of look" is. Different from what? I'm not trying to be difficult here — we just can't read your mind and see what you want so the more descriptive you can be the better!
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:28
2
2
This is all a photography site, so "photography question" is not very useful as a title. I tried to make a more descriptive one — please correct if that's not right.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:01
This is all a photography site, so "photography question" is not very useful as a title. I tried to make a more descriptive one — please correct if that's not right.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:01
Also, you ask about getting the sky to "look like that" in "some of the pictures". It will help us help you if you are more specific about that (and about what you want to replicate here in general.) Please read Important information for asking "What's this effect?" questions and edit this post accordingly.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:02
Also, you ask about getting the sky to "look like that" in "some of the pictures". It will help us help you if you are more specific about that (and about what you want to replicate here in general.) Please read Important information for asking "What's this effect?" questions and edit this post accordingly.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:02
And finally :) you've tagged this "canon". Do you know that these images where taken with a Canon DSLR, or do you have a Canon DSLR you wish to use to replicate them with, or something else?
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:03
And finally :) you've tagged this "canon". Do you know that these images where taken with a Canon DSLR, or do you have a Canon DSLR you wish to use to replicate them with, or something else?
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:03
I didn’t know what title to think about cause I didn’t think the title was that important is my first time using this site to ask for questions but yes this pictures were taken with a canon camera and if you look at the first picture.Do you see how the sky looks how u can see the clouds clear and how it has a different type of look . It was taken with a flash too . I just want to know how I can get the same look from the first picture with my canon camera. It looks more like if someone took them with a film camera
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 15:11
I didn’t know what title to think about cause I didn’t think the title was that important is my first time using this site to ask for questions but yes this pictures were taken with a canon camera and if you look at the first picture.Do you see how the sky looks how u can see the clouds clear and how it has a different type of look . It was taken with a flash too . I just want to know how I can get the same look from the first picture with my canon camera. It looks more like if someone took them with a film camera
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 15:11
2
2
I don't know what "a different type of look" is. Different from what? I'm not trying to be difficult here — we just can't read your mind and see what you want so the more descriptive you can be the better!
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:28
I don't know what "a different type of look" is. Different from what? I'm not trying to be difficult here — we just can't read your mind and see what you want so the more descriptive you can be the better!
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:28
|
show 3 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Can I take a short but cynical poke at these?...
They all look like they were done with a fairly close flash - though whether it's on camera or held up by the photographer I couldn't be certain, they seem to me to be predominantly high & camera right, so maybe he's left-handed & held it up at arm's length in his right hand - who knows?
Late edit... a second guess at this is - it's on camera, but the camera is turned to portrait, pushing the flash to the right... makes more sense as an 'easy shot on auto'.
I'm going to go with - it was done entirely on automatic, TTL metering, so the flash & background are both generally adequately lit, though there are annoying hot-spots on light-coloured clothing & some of the subject's faces.
That also, to me, explains how in pic 3 the TTL was badly fooled by how light the sky was against how dark inside the sports ground.
I think then once back in the computer, the Vibrance was dialled up to just below painful. Contrast is pushed as well. White balance is way over towards 'warm'.
I always like to check a photo in CameraRAW to give me a hint as to what may have been done to the exposure/white balance on a photo. It's not perfect, but for something that already feels over-pushed, then seeing what the 'Auto' setting tries to do to recover it can give big hints as to what was done already to 'spoil' it.
This is what it tried to do to one of them - it's not good, it's not meant to be good, it's just a hint as to how far off 'ideal' it is.
CameraRAW window shrunk down to small to get more info in the screenshot.
I honestly wouldn't consider it a 'look' to try to emulate.
The technique has been done a lot better.
You could learn a lot by reading the Strobist
answered Jun 16 at 18:26
TetsujinTetsujin
8,8902 gold badges23 silver badges53 bronze badges
1
Oh ok than you for the information that you provided with me I will look more forward into reading strobist. Appreciate it for taking ur time and helping me and giving me tips. I will definitely look more into this to see what i can do
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 19:25
add a comment |
Instagram filter?
Toy lens?
- Loreo Lens in a Cap
- Holga HL-C 60mm f/8
On-camera flash. Camera in portrait orientation. TTL metering with camera in Auto mode, as Tetsujin suggests.
ISO pushed high. For grainy, noisy look.
Dirty rear element or sensor. For the dust specks.
Smallish aperture. To bring out the dust specks, and for wide DOF. This will retain details in the clouds and background. Diffraction will also help give the image a soft, not-quite focused look.
Wide-angle lens. So photographer will have to push the camera close to subjects.
Fixed white balance. So ambient colors can introduce varying color casts.
answered Jun 16 at 20:03
xiotaxiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
2, 3 and, 4 look to be on camera, but 1 looks to have the flash off camera
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 22:30
add a comment |
The color tone is produced by accurately setting your camera’s white balance. The subjects in all of your examples are being lit by flash - so the white balance is simply set for the flash.
The exposure as a whole is common for mixed lighting photography - the flash exposure is strong enough to match the sky, thus you have a correctly exposed sky and correctly exposed subject.
The flash on these is off camera and to a side (with an exception for number 3). Note how the shadows on subject 1’s face are in a different direction than the background trees.
If you want to copy the style, you’ll need to properly set your white bal, use flash to light a subject and natural to fill the background, and position the flash off camera. Note that it takes a very powerful strobe to overpower the sun for midday mixed lighting shots (num 1 and 4)...the football shots are during golden hour, where a less powerful strobe or speedlight could be used. I highly recommend strobist.blogspot.com to begin learning mixed lighting.
Posting your attempt along with your goal to this site in a future question will also get you more answers on specific things you could try/change.
answered Jun 16 at 16:45
HuecoHueco
14.1k3 gold badges29 silver badges64 bronze badges
How do I set my white balance. I have a canon T6 and can you explain when u said “the flash on these is off camera and to a side “. Can you tell me what settings on my camera I need to change and how can I change them to make the pictures look like that. Can show me where I need to set my white balance accurately and I appreciate for the help to
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 17:56
1
The pictures all look like they have some sort of tint to me.
– xiota
Jun 16 at 19:53
@xiota yea, seemed a tad warm to me too. But I’m on my phone and don’t trust the colors all that much
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:39
@Corrupted read your manual for how to set different white balance. You can pick up a gray card cheap, take a photo of it filling the frame, then tell your camera to use it as a reference for custom white balance. You can also shoot a color checker card and then do white bal changes in post. The specifics of how can be asked in another question on this site!
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Corrupted is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108978%2fhow-to-take-photos-with-a-yellowish-tone-and-point-and-shoot-film-camera-look%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Can I take a short but cynical poke at these?...
They all look like they were done with a fairly close flash - though whether it's on camera or held up by the photographer I couldn't be certain, they seem to me to be predominantly high & camera right, so maybe he's left-handed & held it up at arm's length in his right hand - who knows?
Late edit... a second guess at this is - it's on camera, but the camera is turned to portrait, pushing the flash to the right... makes more sense as an 'easy shot on auto'.
I'm going to go with - it was done entirely on automatic, TTL metering, so the flash & background are both generally adequately lit, though there are annoying hot-spots on light-coloured clothing & some of the subject's faces.
That also, to me, explains how in pic 3 the TTL was badly fooled by how light the sky was against how dark inside the sports ground.
I think then once back in the computer, the Vibrance was dialled up to just below painful. Contrast is pushed as well. White balance is way over towards 'warm'.
I always like to check a photo in CameraRAW to give me a hint as to what may have been done to the exposure/white balance on a photo. It's not perfect, but for something that already feels over-pushed, then seeing what the 'Auto' setting tries to do to recover it can give big hints as to what was done already to 'spoil' it.
This is what it tried to do to one of them - it's not good, it's not meant to be good, it's just a hint as to how far off 'ideal' it is.
CameraRAW window shrunk down to small to get more info in the screenshot.
I honestly wouldn't consider it a 'look' to try to emulate.
The technique has been done a lot better.
You could learn a lot by reading the Strobist
answered Jun 16 at 18:26
TetsujinTetsujin
8,8902 gold badges23 silver badges53 bronze badges
1
Oh ok than you for the information that you provided with me I will look more forward into reading strobist. Appreciate it for taking ur time and helping me and giving me tips. I will definitely look more into this to see what i can do
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 19:25
add a comment |
Can I take a short but cynical poke at these?...
They all look like they were done with a fairly close flash - though whether it's on camera or held up by the photographer I couldn't be certain, they seem to me to be predominantly high & camera right, so maybe he's left-handed & held it up at arm's length in his right hand - who knows?
Late edit... a second guess at this is - it's on camera, but the camera is turned to portrait, pushing the flash to the right... makes more sense as an 'easy shot on auto'.
I'm going to go with - it was done entirely on automatic, TTL metering, so the flash & background are both generally adequately lit, though there are annoying hot-spots on light-coloured clothing & some of the subject's faces.
That also, to me, explains how in pic 3 the TTL was badly fooled by how light the sky was against how dark inside the sports ground.
I think then once back in the computer, the Vibrance was dialled up to just below painful. Contrast is pushed as well. White balance is way over towards 'warm'.
I always like to check a photo in CameraRAW to give me a hint as to what may have been done to the exposure/white balance on a photo. It's not perfect, but for something that already feels over-pushed, then seeing what the 'Auto' setting tries to do to recover it can give big hints as to what was done already to 'spoil' it.
This is what it tried to do to one of them - it's not good, it's not meant to be good, it's just a hint as to how far off 'ideal' it is.
CameraRAW window shrunk down to small to get more info in the screenshot.
I honestly wouldn't consider it a 'look' to try to emulate.
The technique has been done a lot better.
You could learn a lot by reading the Strobist
answered Jun 16 at 18:26
TetsujinTetsujin
8,8902 gold badges23 silver badges53 bronze badges
1
Oh ok than you for the information that you provided with me I will look more forward into reading strobist. Appreciate it for taking ur time and helping me and giving me tips. I will definitely look more into this to see what i can do
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 19:25
add a comment |
Can I take a short but cynical poke at these?...
They all look like they were done with a fairly close flash - though whether it's on camera or held up by the photographer I couldn't be certain, they seem to me to be predominantly high & camera right, so maybe he's left-handed & held it up at arm's length in his right hand - who knows?
Late edit... a second guess at this is - it's on camera, but the camera is turned to portrait, pushing the flash to the right... makes more sense as an 'easy shot on auto'.
I'm going to go with - it was done entirely on automatic, TTL metering, so the flash & background are both generally adequately lit, though there are annoying hot-spots on light-coloured clothing & some of the subject's faces.
That also, to me, explains how in pic 3 the TTL was badly fooled by how light the sky was against how dark inside the sports ground.
I think then once back in the computer, the Vibrance was dialled up to just below painful. Contrast is pushed as well. White balance is way over towards 'warm'.
I always like to check a photo in CameraRAW to give me a hint as to what may have been done to the exposure/white balance on a photo. It's not perfect, but for something that already feels over-pushed, then seeing what the 'Auto' setting tries to do to recover it can give big hints as to what was done already to 'spoil' it.
This is what it tried to do to one of them - it's not good, it's not meant to be good, it's just a hint as to how far off 'ideal' it is.
CameraRAW window shrunk down to small to get more info in the screenshot.
I honestly wouldn't consider it a 'look' to try to emulate.
The technique has been done a lot better.
You could learn a lot by reading the Strobist
answered Jun 16 at 18:26
TetsujinTetsujin
8,8902 gold badges23 silver badges53 bronze badges
Can I take a short but cynical poke at these?...
They all look like they were done with a fairly close flash - though whether it's on camera or held up by the photographer I couldn't be certain, they seem to me to be predominantly high & camera right, so maybe he's left-handed & held it up at arm's length in his right hand - who knows?
Late edit... a second guess at this is - it's on camera, but the camera is turned to portrait, pushing the flash to the right... makes more sense as an 'easy shot on auto'.
I'm going to go with - it was done entirely on automatic, TTL metering, so the flash & background are both generally adequately lit, though there are annoying hot-spots on light-coloured clothing & some of the subject's faces.
That also, to me, explains how in pic 3 the TTL was badly fooled by how light the sky was against how dark inside the sports ground.
I think then once back in the computer, the Vibrance was dialled up to just below painful. Contrast is pushed as well. White balance is way over towards 'warm'.
I always like to check a photo in CameraRAW to give me a hint as to what may have been done to the exposure/white balance on a photo. It's not perfect, but for something that already feels over-pushed, then seeing what the 'Auto' setting tries to do to recover it can give big hints as to what was done already to 'spoil' it.
This is what it tried to do to one of them - it's not good, it's not meant to be good, it's just a hint as to how far off 'ideal' it is.
CameraRAW window shrunk down to small to get more info in the screenshot.
I honestly wouldn't consider it a 'look' to try to emulate.
The technique has been done a lot better.
You could learn a lot by reading the Strobist
answered Jun 16 at 18:26
TetsujinTetsujin
8,8902 gold badges23 silver badges53 bronze badges
edited Jun 16 at 18:53
answered Jun 16 at 18:26
TetsujinTetsujin
8,8902 gold badges23 silver badges53 bronze badges
answered Jun 16 at 18:26
TetsujinTetsujin
8,8902 gold badges23 silver badges53 bronze badges
answered Jun 16 at 18:26
TetsujinTetsujin
8,8902 gold badges23 silver badges53 bronze badges
8,8902 gold badges23 silver badges53 bronze badges
1
Oh ok than you for the information that you provided with me I will look more forward into reading strobist. Appreciate it for taking ur time and helping me and giving me tips. I will definitely look more into this to see what i can do
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 19:25
add a comment |
1
Oh ok than you for the information that you provided with me I will look more forward into reading strobist. Appreciate it for taking ur time and helping me and giving me tips. I will definitely look more into this to see what i can do
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 19:25
1
1
Oh ok than you for the information that you provided with me I will look more forward into reading strobist. Appreciate it for taking ur time and helping me and giving me tips. I will definitely look more into this to see what i can do
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 19:25
Oh ok than you for the information that you provided with me I will look more forward into reading strobist. Appreciate it for taking ur time and helping me and giving me tips. I will definitely look more into this to see what i can do
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 19:25
add a comment |
Instagram filter?
Toy lens?
- Loreo Lens in a Cap
- Holga HL-C 60mm f/8
On-camera flash. Camera in portrait orientation. TTL metering with camera in Auto mode, as Tetsujin suggests.
ISO pushed high. For grainy, noisy look.
Dirty rear element or sensor. For the dust specks.
Smallish aperture. To bring out the dust specks, and for wide DOF. This will retain details in the clouds and background. Diffraction will also help give the image a soft, not-quite focused look.
Wide-angle lens. So photographer will have to push the camera close to subjects.
Fixed white balance. So ambient colors can introduce varying color casts.
answered Jun 16 at 20:03
xiotaxiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
2, 3 and, 4 look to be on camera, but 1 looks to have the flash off camera
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 22:30
add a comment |
Instagram filter?
Toy lens?
- Loreo Lens in a Cap
- Holga HL-C 60mm f/8
On-camera flash. Camera in portrait orientation. TTL metering with camera in Auto mode, as Tetsujin suggests.
ISO pushed high. For grainy, noisy look.
Dirty rear element or sensor. For the dust specks.
Smallish aperture. To bring out the dust specks, and for wide DOF. This will retain details in the clouds and background. Diffraction will also help give the image a soft, not-quite focused look.
Wide-angle lens. So photographer will have to push the camera close to subjects.
Fixed white balance. So ambient colors can introduce varying color casts.
answered Jun 16 at 20:03
xiotaxiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
2, 3 and, 4 look to be on camera, but 1 looks to have the flash off camera
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 22:30
add a comment |
Instagram filter?
Toy lens?
- Loreo Lens in a Cap
- Holga HL-C 60mm f/8
On-camera flash. Camera in portrait orientation. TTL metering with camera in Auto mode, as Tetsujin suggests.
ISO pushed high. For grainy, noisy look.
Dirty rear element or sensor. For the dust specks.
Smallish aperture. To bring out the dust specks, and for wide DOF. This will retain details in the clouds and background. Diffraction will also help give the image a soft, not-quite focused look.
Wide-angle lens. So photographer will have to push the camera close to subjects.
Fixed white balance. So ambient colors can introduce varying color casts.
answered Jun 16 at 20:03
xiotaxiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
Instagram filter?
Toy lens?
- Loreo Lens in a Cap
- Holga HL-C 60mm f/8
On-camera flash. Camera in portrait orientation. TTL metering with camera in Auto mode, as Tetsujin suggests.
ISO pushed high. For grainy, noisy look.
Dirty rear element or sensor. For the dust specks.
Smallish aperture. To bring out the dust specks, and for wide DOF. This will retain details in the clouds and background. Diffraction will also help give the image a soft, not-quite focused look.
Wide-angle lens. So photographer will have to push the camera close to subjects.
Fixed white balance. So ambient colors can introduce varying color casts.
answered Jun 16 at 20:03
xiotaxiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
edited Jun 17 at 1:34
answered Jun 16 at 20:03
xiotaxiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
answered Jun 16 at 20:03
xiotaxiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
answered Jun 16 at 20:03
xiotaxiota
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
14.8k4 gold badges22 silver badges74 bronze badges
2, 3 and, 4 look to be on camera, but 1 looks to have the flash off camera
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 22:30
add a comment |
2, 3 and, 4 look to be on camera, but 1 looks to have the flash off camera
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 22:30
2, 3 and, 4 look to be on camera, but 1 looks to have the flash off camera
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 22:30
2, 3 and, 4 look to be on camera, but 1 looks to have the flash off camera
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 22:30
add a comment |
The color tone is produced by accurately setting your camera’s white balance. The subjects in all of your examples are being lit by flash - so the white balance is simply set for the flash.
The exposure as a whole is common for mixed lighting photography - the flash exposure is strong enough to match the sky, thus you have a correctly exposed sky and correctly exposed subject.
The flash on these is off camera and to a side (with an exception for number 3). Note how the shadows on subject 1’s face are in a different direction than the background trees.
If you want to copy the style, you’ll need to properly set your white bal, use flash to light a subject and natural to fill the background, and position the flash off camera. Note that it takes a very powerful strobe to overpower the sun for midday mixed lighting shots (num 1 and 4)...the football shots are during golden hour, where a less powerful strobe or speedlight could be used. I highly recommend strobist.blogspot.com to begin learning mixed lighting.
Posting your attempt along with your goal to this site in a future question will also get you more answers on specific things you could try/change.
answered Jun 16 at 16:45
HuecoHueco
14.1k3 gold badges29 silver badges64 bronze badges
How do I set my white balance. I have a canon T6 and can you explain when u said “the flash on these is off camera and to a side “. Can you tell me what settings on my camera I need to change and how can I change them to make the pictures look like that. Can show me where I need to set my white balance accurately and I appreciate for the help to
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 17:56
1
The pictures all look like they have some sort of tint to me.
– xiota
Jun 16 at 19:53
@xiota yea, seemed a tad warm to me too. But I’m on my phone and don’t trust the colors all that much
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:39
@Corrupted read your manual for how to set different white balance. You can pick up a gray card cheap, take a photo of it filling the frame, then tell your camera to use it as a reference for custom white balance. You can also shoot a color checker card and then do white bal changes in post. The specifics of how can be asked in another question on this site!
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:44
add a comment |
The color tone is produced by accurately setting your camera’s white balance. The subjects in all of your examples are being lit by flash - so the white balance is simply set for the flash.
The exposure as a whole is common for mixed lighting photography - the flash exposure is strong enough to match the sky, thus you have a correctly exposed sky and correctly exposed subject.
The flash on these is off camera and to a side (with an exception for number 3). Note how the shadows on subject 1’s face are in a different direction than the background trees.
If you want to copy the style, you’ll need to properly set your white bal, use flash to light a subject and natural to fill the background, and position the flash off camera. Note that it takes a very powerful strobe to overpower the sun for midday mixed lighting shots (num 1 and 4)...the football shots are during golden hour, where a less powerful strobe or speedlight could be used. I highly recommend strobist.blogspot.com to begin learning mixed lighting.
Posting your attempt along with your goal to this site in a future question will also get you more answers on specific things you could try/change.
answered Jun 16 at 16:45
HuecoHueco
14.1k3 gold badges29 silver badges64 bronze badges
How do I set my white balance. I have a canon T6 and can you explain when u said “the flash on these is off camera and to a side “. Can you tell me what settings on my camera I need to change and how can I change them to make the pictures look like that. Can show me where I need to set my white balance accurately and I appreciate for the help to
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 17:56
1
The pictures all look like they have some sort of tint to me.
– xiota
Jun 16 at 19:53
@xiota yea, seemed a tad warm to me too. But I’m on my phone and don’t trust the colors all that much
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:39
@Corrupted read your manual for how to set different white balance. You can pick up a gray card cheap, take a photo of it filling the frame, then tell your camera to use it as a reference for custom white balance. You can also shoot a color checker card and then do white bal changes in post. The specifics of how can be asked in another question on this site!
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:44
add a comment |
The color tone is produced by accurately setting your camera’s white balance. The subjects in all of your examples are being lit by flash - so the white balance is simply set for the flash.
The exposure as a whole is common for mixed lighting photography - the flash exposure is strong enough to match the sky, thus you have a correctly exposed sky and correctly exposed subject.
The flash on these is off camera and to a side (with an exception for number 3). Note how the shadows on subject 1’s face are in a different direction than the background trees.
If you want to copy the style, you’ll need to properly set your white bal, use flash to light a subject and natural to fill the background, and position the flash off camera. Note that it takes a very powerful strobe to overpower the sun for midday mixed lighting shots (num 1 and 4)...the football shots are during golden hour, where a less powerful strobe or speedlight could be used. I highly recommend strobist.blogspot.com to begin learning mixed lighting.
Posting your attempt along with your goal to this site in a future question will also get you more answers on specific things you could try/change.
answered Jun 16 at 16:45
HuecoHueco
14.1k3 gold badges29 silver badges64 bronze badges
The color tone is produced by accurately setting your camera’s white balance. The subjects in all of your examples are being lit by flash - so the white balance is simply set for the flash.
The exposure as a whole is common for mixed lighting photography - the flash exposure is strong enough to match the sky, thus you have a correctly exposed sky and correctly exposed subject.
The flash on these is off camera and to a side (with an exception for number 3). Note how the shadows on subject 1’s face are in a different direction than the background trees.
If you want to copy the style, you’ll need to properly set your white bal, use flash to light a subject and natural to fill the background, and position the flash off camera. Note that it takes a very powerful strobe to overpower the sun for midday mixed lighting shots (num 1 and 4)...the football shots are during golden hour, where a less powerful strobe or speedlight could be used. I highly recommend strobist.blogspot.com to begin learning mixed lighting.
Posting your attempt along with your goal to this site in a future question will also get you more answers on specific things you could try/change.
answered Jun 16 at 16:45
HuecoHueco
14.1k3 gold badges29 silver badges64 bronze badges
answered Jun 16 at 16:45
HuecoHueco
14.1k3 gold badges29 silver badges64 bronze badges
answered Jun 16 at 16:45
HuecoHueco
14.1k3 gold badges29 silver badges64 bronze badges
answered Jun 16 at 16:45
HuecoHueco
14.1k3 gold badges29 silver badges64 bronze badges
14.1k3 gold badges29 silver badges64 bronze badges
How do I set my white balance. I have a canon T6 and can you explain when u said “the flash on these is off camera and to a side “. Can you tell me what settings on my camera I need to change and how can I change them to make the pictures look like that. Can show me where I need to set my white balance accurately and I appreciate for the help to
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 17:56
1
The pictures all look like they have some sort of tint to me.
– xiota
Jun 16 at 19:53
@xiota yea, seemed a tad warm to me too. But I’m on my phone and don’t trust the colors all that much
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:39
@Corrupted read your manual for how to set different white balance. You can pick up a gray card cheap, take a photo of it filling the frame, then tell your camera to use it as a reference for custom white balance. You can also shoot a color checker card and then do white bal changes in post. The specifics of how can be asked in another question on this site!
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:44
add a comment |
How do I set my white balance. I have a canon T6 and can you explain when u said “the flash on these is off camera and to a side “. Can you tell me what settings on my camera I need to change and how can I change them to make the pictures look like that. Can show me where I need to set my white balance accurately and I appreciate for the help to
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 17:56
1
The pictures all look like they have some sort of tint to me.
– xiota
Jun 16 at 19:53
@xiota yea, seemed a tad warm to me too. But I’m on my phone and don’t trust the colors all that much
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:39
@Corrupted read your manual for how to set different white balance. You can pick up a gray card cheap, take a photo of it filling the frame, then tell your camera to use it as a reference for custom white balance. You can also shoot a color checker card and then do white bal changes in post. The specifics of how can be asked in another question on this site!
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:44
How do I set my white balance. I have a canon T6 and can you explain when u said “the flash on these is off camera and to a side “. Can you tell me what settings on my camera I need to change and how can I change them to make the pictures look like that. Can show me where I need to set my white balance accurately and I appreciate for the help to
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 17:56
How do I set my white balance. I have a canon T6 and can you explain when u said “the flash on these is off camera and to a side “. Can you tell me what settings on my camera I need to change and how can I change them to make the pictures look like that. Can show me where I need to set my white balance accurately and I appreciate for the help to
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 17:56
1
1
The pictures all look like they have some sort of tint to me.
– xiota
Jun 16 at 19:53
The pictures all look like they have some sort of tint to me.
– xiota
Jun 16 at 19:53
@xiota yea, seemed a tad warm to me too. But I’m on my phone and don’t trust the colors all that much
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:39
@xiota yea, seemed a tad warm to me too. But I’m on my phone and don’t trust the colors all that much
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:39
@Corrupted read your manual for how to set different white balance. You can pick up a gray card cheap, take a photo of it filling the frame, then tell your camera to use it as a reference for custom white balance. You can also shoot a color checker card and then do white bal changes in post. The specifics of how can be asked in another question on this site!
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:44
@Corrupted read your manual for how to set different white balance. You can pick up a gray card cheap, take a photo of it filling the frame, then tell your camera to use it as a reference for custom white balance. You can also shoot a color checker card and then do white bal changes in post. The specifics of how can be asked in another question on this site!
– Hueco
Jun 16 at 20:44
add a comment |
Corrupted is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Corrupted is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Corrupted is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Corrupted is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108978%2fhow-to-take-photos-with-a-yellowish-tone-and-point-and-shoot-film-camera-look%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
This is all a photography site, so "photography question" is not very useful as a title. I tried to make a more descriptive one — please correct if that's not right.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:01
Also, you ask about getting the sky to "look like that" in "some of the pictures". It will help us help you if you are more specific about that (and about what you want to replicate here in general.) Please read Important information for asking "What's this effect?" questions and edit this post accordingly.
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:02
And finally :) you've tagged this "canon". Do you know that these images where taken with a Canon DSLR, or do you have a Canon DSLR you wish to use to replicate them with, or something else?
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:03
I didn’t know what title to think about cause I didn’t think the title was that important is my first time using this site to ask for questions but yes this pictures were taken with a canon camera and if you look at the first picture.Do you see how the sky looks how u can see the clouds clear and how it has a different type of look . It was taken with a flash too . I just want to know how I can get the same look from the first picture with my canon camera. It looks more like if someone took them with a film camera
– Corrupted
Jun 16 at 15:11
2
I don't know what "a different type of look" is. Different from what? I'm not trying to be difficult here — we just can't read your mind and see what you want so the more descriptive you can be the better!
– mattdm
Jun 16 at 15:28