Contributing to a candidate as a Foreign National US Resident?Can foreign national US residents volunteer with US political campaigns?Is it illegal for a President or the Executive Branch to increase Congressional pay/benefits?Does Citizens United create a back channel for foreign nationals to funnel money into electoral campaigns in these United States?Get rid of national debt from excess campaign fundsRegarding refusing corporate, lobbyist, and PAC money: Lobbyists versus employees, local versus national PACs?What's the point of campaign financing limits if external organizations may promote the candidate without any funding limits?How do very small countries prevent foreign interests from buying out their political elite?Are political donations to foreign politicians residing in Canada but campaigning abroad tax free?Rights of foreign national to lobby congress membersDisclosure and publishing of 'catch and kill' practices favouring a presidential candidateTo what extent is a US political presidential candidate compromised by PAC funding?
Are there any sports for which the world's best player is female?
What happens when adult Billy Batson says "Shazam"?
How do native German speakers usually express skepticism (using even) about a premise?
What attributes and how big would a sea creature(s) need to be able to tow a ship?
What is this little owl-like bird?
Why archangel Michael didn't save Jesus when he was crucified?
What is the correct parsing of お高くとまる?
Chorophyll and photosynthesis in plants with coloured leaves
Why did Harry Potter get a bedroom?
What is a "Lear Processor" and how did it work?
What the real concept of Static keyword in perspective of Embedded C. See below code
Is this a reference to the film Alien in the novel 2010 Odyssey Two?
Misspelling my name on my mathematical publications
The origin of a particular self-reference paradox
Distinguish the explanations of Galadriel's test in LotR
How to compare the ls output of two folders to find a missing directory?
Efficiently defining a SparseArray function
When I press the space bar it deletes the letters in front of it
Is there any reason why MCU changed the Snap to Blip
PDF page & word count, recursive searching of directory tree, output to excel
Having decision making power over someone's assets
Would a carnivorous diet be able to support a giant worm?
Why different specifications for telescopes and binoculars?
Is that a case of "DOUBLE-NEGATIVES" as claimed by Grammarly?
Contributing to a candidate as a Foreign National US Resident?
Can foreign national US residents volunteer with US political campaigns?Is it illegal for a President or the Executive Branch to increase Congressional pay/benefits?Does Citizens United create a back channel for foreign nationals to funnel money into electoral campaigns in these United States?Get rid of national debt from excess campaign fundsRegarding refusing corporate, lobbyist, and PAC money: Lobbyists versus employees, local versus national PACs?What's the point of campaign financing limits if external organizations may promote the candidate without any funding limits?How do very small countries prevent foreign interests from buying out their political elite?Are political donations to foreign politicians residing in Canada but campaigning abroad tax free?Rights of foreign national to lobby congress membersDisclosure and publishing of 'catch and kill' practices favouring a presidential candidateTo what extent is a US political presidential candidate compromised by PAC funding?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I'm not sure if this is the correct exchange to be posting this question, so apologies if this is not the right place.
I'm a US Resident, currently on a H1-B. I'm not a Green Card holder or a US National. I'm attempting to contribute to a candidate for the 2020 election but on the donation webpage, I see the need to certify that
I am a U.S. citizen or lawfully admitted permanent resident (i.e., green card holder).
I'm wondering if this makes me ineligible to make the contribution? Also what are the penalties for making a false declaration (I'm curious to know the law and reasoning behind this).
The other side question is about buying bumper stickers and the like from the candidate's online store, I'm presented with the same declaration. Is buying merchandise also included in the scope and is it similarly illegal for me to have a bumper sticker on my car.
Lastly are there ways for me to legally sidestep this requirement? A couple of thoughts that I have are
- My infant son is a US Citizen, could I contribute in his name?
- Could I ask a colleague at work who is a US Citizen to make the contribution and pay him?
I'm not looking to do anything illegal as I don't want to adversely impact my future immigration application. In answers I'm looking to better understand the relevant provisions in law and the possible rationale of excluding legal residents and if it can be sidestepped while still staying in the boundaries of the law(s).
united-states campaign-finance
add a comment |
I'm not sure if this is the correct exchange to be posting this question, so apologies if this is not the right place.
I'm a US Resident, currently on a H1-B. I'm not a Green Card holder or a US National. I'm attempting to contribute to a candidate for the 2020 election but on the donation webpage, I see the need to certify that
I am a U.S. citizen or lawfully admitted permanent resident (i.e., green card holder).
I'm wondering if this makes me ineligible to make the contribution? Also what are the penalties for making a false declaration (I'm curious to know the law and reasoning behind this).
The other side question is about buying bumper stickers and the like from the candidate's online store, I'm presented with the same declaration. Is buying merchandise also included in the scope and is it similarly illegal for me to have a bumper sticker on my car.
Lastly are there ways for me to legally sidestep this requirement? A couple of thoughts that I have are
- My infant son is a US Citizen, could I contribute in his name?
- Could I ask a colleague at work who is a US Citizen to make the contribution and pay him?
I'm not looking to do anything illegal as I don't want to adversely impact my future immigration application. In answers I'm looking to better understand the relevant provisions in law and the possible rationale of excluding legal residents and if it can be sidestepped while still staying in the boundaries of the law(s).
united-states campaign-finance
You might be able to create a company and then donate on behalf of the company, but the law seems vague about this...
– spacetyper
Jul 2 at 8:42
add a comment |
I'm not sure if this is the correct exchange to be posting this question, so apologies if this is not the right place.
I'm a US Resident, currently on a H1-B. I'm not a Green Card holder or a US National. I'm attempting to contribute to a candidate for the 2020 election but on the donation webpage, I see the need to certify that
I am a U.S. citizen or lawfully admitted permanent resident (i.e., green card holder).
I'm wondering if this makes me ineligible to make the contribution? Also what are the penalties for making a false declaration (I'm curious to know the law and reasoning behind this).
The other side question is about buying bumper stickers and the like from the candidate's online store, I'm presented with the same declaration. Is buying merchandise also included in the scope and is it similarly illegal for me to have a bumper sticker on my car.
Lastly are there ways for me to legally sidestep this requirement? A couple of thoughts that I have are
- My infant son is a US Citizen, could I contribute in his name?
- Could I ask a colleague at work who is a US Citizen to make the contribution and pay him?
I'm not looking to do anything illegal as I don't want to adversely impact my future immigration application. In answers I'm looking to better understand the relevant provisions in law and the possible rationale of excluding legal residents and if it can be sidestepped while still staying in the boundaries of the law(s).
united-states campaign-finance
I'm not sure if this is the correct exchange to be posting this question, so apologies if this is not the right place.
I'm a US Resident, currently on a H1-B. I'm not a Green Card holder or a US National. I'm attempting to contribute to a candidate for the 2020 election but on the donation webpage, I see the need to certify that
I am a U.S. citizen or lawfully admitted permanent resident (i.e., green card holder).
I'm wondering if this makes me ineligible to make the contribution? Also what are the penalties for making a false declaration (I'm curious to know the law and reasoning behind this).
The other side question is about buying bumper stickers and the like from the candidate's online store, I'm presented with the same declaration. Is buying merchandise also included in the scope and is it similarly illegal for me to have a bumper sticker on my car.
Lastly are there ways for me to legally sidestep this requirement? A couple of thoughts that I have are
- My infant son is a US Citizen, could I contribute in his name?
- Could I ask a colleague at work who is a US Citizen to make the contribution and pay him?
I'm not looking to do anything illegal as I don't want to adversely impact my future immigration application. In answers I'm looking to better understand the relevant provisions in law and the possible rationale of excluding legal residents and if it can be sidestepped while still staying in the boundaries of the law(s).
united-states campaign-finance
united-states campaign-finance
edited Jul 1 at 4:38
Brythan
76.5k8 gold badges163 silver badges260 bronze badges
76.5k8 gold badges163 silver badges260 bronze badges
asked Jul 1 at 0:54
nikhilnikhil
2232 silver badges6 bronze badges
2232 silver badges6 bronze badges
You might be able to create a company and then donate on behalf of the company, but the law seems vague about this...
– spacetyper
Jul 2 at 8:42
add a comment |
You might be able to create a company and then donate on behalf of the company, but the law seems vague about this...
– spacetyper
Jul 2 at 8:42
You might be able to create a company and then donate on behalf of the company, but the law seems vague about this...
– spacetyper
Jul 2 at 8:42
You might be able to create a company and then donate on behalf of the company, but the law seems vague about this...
– spacetyper
Jul 2 at 8:42
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
Under US law, only US citizens or permanent residents may contribute to political campaigns. Since you are neither, you may not contribute to a US political campaign and no campaign may accept your contributions.
Also what are the penalties for making a false declaration (I'm curious to know the law and reasoning behind this).
If you specifically falsely claim to be a US citizen: false claims of citizenship for the purposes of any state or federal law make you deportable from the United States and permanently barred from reentering. The only exception is for certain people who believe for good reason that they're citizens (both parents have to be current or former citizens and the person must have lived in the US before they turned 16). Falsely claiming citizenship is also a crime punishable by up to 3 years in prison.
If all you say is "I am a citizen or permanent resident," that might not be a false claim of citizenship. However, other penalties can still apply: if your lie resulted in the campaign treasurer making an incorrect FEC disclosure you might get charged with making false statements, sufficiently large contributions result in direct criminal liability, and there are other theories that could result in prosecution as well. You can also be subject to a civil penalty, as can the campaign.
Lastly are there ways for me to legally sidestep this requirement? A couple of thoughts that I have are
- My infant son is a US Citizen, could I contribute in his name?
- Could I ask a colleague at work who is a US Citizen to make the contribution and pay him?
Both of these are illegal in their own right. It's still considered you making the contribution (which is illegal), but it's also specifically illegal to make a contribution in the name of someone else or to pay someone to contribute. Again, this might be prosecuted criminally or it might result in a civil penalty, depending on various circumstances.
It's also worth noting that there's pending legislation (which has passed the Senate but not yet been taken up in the House) that would, if enacted, make any noncitizen who violated campaign finance laws to interfere in any US election both deportable and permanently inadmissible.
Thanks for your answer, it appears that the penalties are rather stiff. Do you have any thoughts about making purchase for merchandise on their online store having these same restrictions?
– nikhil
Jul 1 at 3:17
6
@nikhil It’s a campaign contribution whether they give you merchandise for it or not.
– Joe
Jul 1 at 12:28
2
A good link to include in the answer is the FEC's own page on this exact issue: fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/…
– cpcodes
Jul 1 at 23:54
1
I find it quite scary if buying, say, a hat, could result in getting deported! Is there really no specified (smallish) size of permitted (and possibly accidental) donation?
– nigel222
Jul 3 at 12:43
People in the U.S., including a former president cnn.com/2019/06/28/politics/… , are still arguing about the effects of foreign influence on the last presidential election. Regardless of the size of donation, (most) Americans do not want other countries getting involved in our politics.
– RWW
Jul 3 at 20:52
add a comment |
Is buying merchandise also included in the scope
If the money goes to the campaign, yes. Presumably they are putting the notice there because the money is going to the campaign. E.g. Kamala Harris' campaign sells t-shirts and uses the proceeds to support the campaign.
I'm not sure what happens if you, as a foreign national, exhibit merchandise advertising a candidate. One of the complaints around the Citizens United decision was that it might allow foreign corporations to purchase merchandise to support a candidate. Justice Samuel Alito was adamant at the time that it would not do that.
The basic idea is that United States elections should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries. You may not feel that you belong in the same class as Vladimir Putin or Kim Jong Un, but from the legal standpoint, there is no difference. All are in the category of "not US citizens" that cannot spend on US campaigns. Without that, someone like Putin could give an individual some money and ask the individual to contribute. A more limited rule would then require that the US prove the Putin association to convict on the inappropriate contribution charge. This rule is much simpler to enforce.
1
@MartinBonner They might be more about advertising but they're at least partly about making money.
– David Richerby
Jul 1 at 13:07
6
The choice of prepositions in "should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries" is just about the worst possible one, given that this question is about what someone who is from another country but in the USA can do.
– Peter Taylor
Jul 1 at 14:13
1
@nikhil given that only citizens can vote, some may feel that non-citizens even those resident in the US shouldn't be able to influence the election directly
– eques
Jul 1 at 17:32
3
@nikhil but a "Green Card" represents a permanent (or presumably permanent) state compared to a visa holder which is presumed temporary (even if fairly long-term). So the argument could be made to allow Green Card holders to donate even though they cannot vote because they do have some vested interest in the country since they will remain here longer.
– eques
Jul 1 at 19:25
1
@MartinBonner If there was an independent retailer selling politically themed merchandise, I don't see how that in itself would be a problem. The issue would likely be finding someone who is legally making and selling those products without giving a cut to the campaigns.
– JMac
Jul 2 at 13:02
|
show 7 more comments
You can't contribute toward an election, but issue activism is the loophole. If you like the candidate because they's good on issues, find a organization that agrees with you on the issue -- the NRA, for instance, is awash in Russian money. If you like the candidate because they's a personal friend, find a nonprofit that donates to them, and donate to that nonprofit. If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law.
New contributor
If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law. – I don't get how this relates to the question on whether one is a US national or not. Why should US people allowed to do this?
– Paŭlo Ebermann
Jul 2 at 20:16
1
It's a collective. Money is one way we enable candidates that we like, to effect the change we want to see. I'm not going to defend this system, but that's how I understand it. If you're not a permanent resident or citizen, you're not part of the collective, and you may well be acting on behalf of a foreign power.
– Ion Freeman
Jul 2 at 20:36
1
Saying that NRA is "awash" in Russian money is outrageous. According to your source, they received "$2,512.85 in contributions and membership dues from people associated with Russian addresses.” That's not even guaranteed to be unethical. Every Fortune 500 operates in Russia and has an office in Moscow. Many of them are staffed by some Americans. So this is not even unusual.
– grovkin
Jul 3 at 19:45
1
@grovkin indeed. I'm no fan of the NRA, but I find two and a half grand from "people associated with Russian addresses" to be frankly small potatoes, and, as you note, probably entirely legitimate. Not only do some US citizens live in Russia, but many Russian citizens have green cards (making them eligible to donate to federal campaigns) yet may remain "associated with Russian addresses."
– phoog
Jul 4 at 1:53
add a comment |
FEC has a page detailing foreign nationals' rights in this regard.
It's not long. And it aims at informing the general public (so no specific prior legal knowledge is required). Although, for the interested, it does have the relevant legal references.
For example, despite some of the comments, a foreign national may not "direct, dictate, control, or directly or indirectly participate in the decision-making process with regard to any election-related activities. Such activities include, the making of contributions, donations...
add a comment |
According to FEC.gov only citizens and green-card holders can spend money or donate things of value. As a non-resident you are prohibited from:
- Making any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or making any expenditure, independent expenditure, or
disbursement in connection with any federal, state or local election
in the United States;
- Making any contribution or donation to any committee or organization of any national, state, district, or local political party (including
donations to a party nonfederal account or office building account);
- Making any disbursement for an electioneering communication;
- Making any donation to a presidential inaugural committee.
However you can volunteer your time, as long as you aren't making decisions involving money:
Generally, an individual (including a foreign national) may volunteer
personal services to a federal candidate or federal political
committee without making a contribution. The Act provides this
volunteer "exemption" as long as the individual performing the service
is not compensated by anyone.
It also looks like you might be able to work at the polls in Georgia and Idaho, those are the only 2 states which don't require you to be an eligible voter to do that.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42593%2fcontributing-to-a-candidate-as-a-foreign-national-us-resident%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Under US law, only US citizens or permanent residents may contribute to political campaigns. Since you are neither, you may not contribute to a US political campaign and no campaign may accept your contributions.
Also what are the penalties for making a false declaration (I'm curious to know the law and reasoning behind this).
If you specifically falsely claim to be a US citizen: false claims of citizenship for the purposes of any state or federal law make you deportable from the United States and permanently barred from reentering. The only exception is for certain people who believe for good reason that they're citizens (both parents have to be current or former citizens and the person must have lived in the US before they turned 16). Falsely claiming citizenship is also a crime punishable by up to 3 years in prison.
If all you say is "I am a citizen or permanent resident," that might not be a false claim of citizenship. However, other penalties can still apply: if your lie resulted in the campaign treasurer making an incorrect FEC disclosure you might get charged with making false statements, sufficiently large contributions result in direct criminal liability, and there are other theories that could result in prosecution as well. You can also be subject to a civil penalty, as can the campaign.
Lastly are there ways for me to legally sidestep this requirement? A couple of thoughts that I have are
- My infant son is a US Citizen, could I contribute in his name?
- Could I ask a colleague at work who is a US Citizen to make the contribution and pay him?
Both of these are illegal in their own right. It's still considered you making the contribution (which is illegal), but it's also specifically illegal to make a contribution in the name of someone else or to pay someone to contribute. Again, this might be prosecuted criminally or it might result in a civil penalty, depending on various circumstances.
It's also worth noting that there's pending legislation (which has passed the Senate but not yet been taken up in the House) that would, if enacted, make any noncitizen who violated campaign finance laws to interfere in any US election both deportable and permanently inadmissible.
Thanks for your answer, it appears that the penalties are rather stiff. Do you have any thoughts about making purchase for merchandise on their online store having these same restrictions?
– nikhil
Jul 1 at 3:17
6
@nikhil It’s a campaign contribution whether they give you merchandise for it or not.
– Joe
Jul 1 at 12:28
2
A good link to include in the answer is the FEC's own page on this exact issue: fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/…
– cpcodes
Jul 1 at 23:54
1
I find it quite scary if buying, say, a hat, could result in getting deported! Is there really no specified (smallish) size of permitted (and possibly accidental) donation?
– nigel222
Jul 3 at 12:43
People in the U.S., including a former president cnn.com/2019/06/28/politics/… , are still arguing about the effects of foreign influence on the last presidential election. Regardless of the size of donation, (most) Americans do not want other countries getting involved in our politics.
– RWW
Jul 3 at 20:52
add a comment |
Under US law, only US citizens or permanent residents may contribute to political campaigns. Since you are neither, you may not contribute to a US political campaign and no campaign may accept your contributions.
Also what are the penalties for making a false declaration (I'm curious to know the law and reasoning behind this).
If you specifically falsely claim to be a US citizen: false claims of citizenship for the purposes of any state or federal law make you deportable from the United States and permanently barred from reentering. The only exception is for certain people who believe for good reason that they're citizens (both parents have to be current or former citizens and the person must have lived in the US before they turned 16). Falsely claiming citizenship is also a crime punishable by up to 3 years in prison.
If all you say is "I am a citizen or permanent resident," that might not be a false claim of citizenship. However, other penalties can still apply: if your lie resulted in the campaign treasurer making an incorrect FEC disclosure you might get charged with making false statements, sufficiently large contributions result in direct criminal liability, and there are other theories that could result in prosecution as well. You can also be subject to a civil penalty, as can the campaign.
Lastly are there ways for me to legally sidestep this requirement? A couple of thoughts that I have are
- My infant son is a US Citizen, could I contribute in his name?
- Could I ask a colleague at work who is a US Citizen to make the contribution and pay him?
Both of these are illegal in their own right. It's still considered you making the contribution (which is illegal), but it's also specifically illegal to make a contribution in the name of someone else or to pay someone to contribute. Again, this might be prosecuted criminally or it might result in a civil penalty, depending on various circumstances.
It's also worth noting that there's pending legislation (which has passed the Senate but not yet been taken up in the House) that would, if enacted, make any noncitizen who violated campaign finance laws to interfere in any US election both deportable and permanently inadmissible.
Thanks for your answer, it appears that the penalties are rather stiff. Do you have any thoughts about making purchase for merchandise on their online store having these same restrictions?
– nikhil
Jul 1 at 3:17
6
@nikhil It’s a campaign contribution whether they give you merchandise for it or not.
– Joe
Jul 1 at 12:28
2
A good link to include in the answer is the FEC's own page on this exact issue: fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/…
– cpcodes
Jul 1 at 23:54
1
I find it quite scary if buying, say, a hat, could result in getting deported! Is there really no specified (smallish) size of permitted (and possibly accidental) donation?
– nigel222
Jul 3 at 12:43
People in the U.S., including a former president cnn.com/2019/06/28/politics/… , are still arguing about the effects of foreign influence on the last presidential election. Regardless of the size of donation, (most) Americans do not want other countries getting involved in our politics.
– RWW
Jul 3 at 20:52
add a comment |
Under US law, only US citizens or permanent residents may contribute to political campaigns. Since you are neither, you may not contribute to a US political campaign and no campaign may accept your contributions.
Also what are the penalties for making a false declaration (I'm curious to know the law and reasoning behind this).
If you specifically falsely claim to be a US citizen: false claims of citizenship for the purposes of any state or federal law make you deportable from the United States and permanently barred from reentering. The only exception is for certain people who believe for good reason that they're citizens (both parents have to be current or former citizens and the person must have lived in the US before they turned 16). Falsely claiming citizenship is also a crime punishable by up to 3 years in prison.
If all you say is "I am a citizen or permanent resident," that might not be a false claim of citizenship. However, other penalties can still apply: if your lie resulted in the campaign treasurer making an incorrect FEC disclosure you might get charged with making false statements, sufficiently large contributions result in direct criminal liability, and there are other theories that could result in prosecution as well. You can also be subject to a civil penalty, as can the campaign.
Lastly are there ways for me to legally sidestep this requirement? A couple of thoughts that I have are
- My infant son is a US Citizen, could I contribute in his name?
- Could I ask a colleague at work who is a US Citizen to make the contribution and pay him?
Both of these are illegal in their own right. It's still considered you making the contribution (which is illegal), but it's also specifically illegal to make a contribution in the name of someone else or to pay someone to contribute. Again, this might be prosecuted criminally or it might result in a civil penalty, depending on various circumstances.
It's also worth noting that there's pending legislation (which has passed the Senate but not yet been taken up in the House) that would, if enacted, make any noncitizen who violated campaign finance laws to interfere in any US election both deportable and permanently inadmissible.
Under US law, only US citizens or permanent residents may contribute to political campaigns. Since you are neither, you may not contribute to a US political campaign and no campaign may accept your contributions.
Also what are the penalties for making a false declaration (I'm curious to know the law and reasoning behind this).
If you specifically falsely claim to be a US citizen: false claims of citizenship for the purposes of any state or federal law make you deportable from the United States and permanently barred from reentering. The only exception is for certain people who believe for good reason that they're citizens (both parents have to be current or former citizens and the person must have lived in the US before they turned 16). Falsely claiming citizenship is also a crime punishable by up to 3 years in prison.
If all you say is "I am a citizen or permanent resident," that might not be a false claim of citizenship. However, other penalties can still apply: if your lie resulted in the campaign treasurer making an incorrect FEC disclosure you might get charged with making false statements, sufficiently large contributions result in direct criminal liability, and there are other theories that could result in prosecution as well. You can also be subject to a civil penalty, as can the campaign.
Lastly are there ways for me to legally sidestep this requirement? A couple of thoughts that I have are
- My infant son is a US Citizen, could I contribute in his name?
- Could I ask a colleague at work who is a US Citizen to make the contribution and pay him?
Both of these are illegal in their own right. It's still considered you making the contribution (which is illegal), but it's also specifically illegal to make a contribution in the name of someone else or to pay someone to contribute. Again, this might be prosecuted criminally or it might result in a civil penalty, depending on various circumstances.
It's also worth noting that there's pending legislation (which has passed the Senate but not yet been taken up in the House) that would, if enacted, make any noncitizen who violated campaign finance laws to interfere in any US election both deportable and permanently inadmissible.
answered Jul 1 at 2:10
cpastcpast
9,5552 gold badges39 silver badges56 bronze badges
9,5552 gold badges39 silver badges56 bronze badges
Thanks for your answer, it appears that the penalties are rather stiff. Do you have any thoughts about making purchase for merchandise on their online store having these same restrictions?
– nikhil
Jul 1 at 3:17
6
@nikhil It’s a campaign contribution whether they give you merchandise for it or not.
– Joe
Jul 1 at 12:28
2
A good link to include in the answer is the FEC's own page on this exact issue: fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/…
– cpcodes
Jul 1 at 23:54
1
I find it quite scary if buying, say, a hat, could result in getting deported! Is there really no specified (smallish) size of permitted (and possibly accidental) donation?
– nigel222
Jul 3 at 12:43
People in the U.S., including a former president cnn.com/2019/06/28/politics/… , are still arguing about the effects of foreign influence on the last presidential election. Regardless of the size of donation, (most) Americans do not want other countries getting involved in our politics.
– RWW
Jul 3 at 20:52
add a comment |
Thanks for your answer, it appears that the penalties are rather stiff. Do you have any thoughts about making purchase for merchandise on their online store having these same restrictions?
– nikhil
Jul 1 at 3:17
6
@nikhil It’s a campaign contribution whether they give you merchandise for it or not.
– Joe
Jul 1 at 12:28
2
A good link to include in the answer is the FEC's own page on this exact issue: fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/…
– cpcodes
Jul 1 at 23:54
1
I find it quite scary if buying, say, a hat, could result in getting deported! Is there really no specified (smallish) size of permitted (and possibly accidental) donation?
– nigel222
Jul 3 at 12:43
People in the U.S., including a former president cnn.com/2019/06/28/politics/… , are still arguing about the effects of foreign influence on the last presidential election. Regardless of the size of donation, (most) Americans do not want other countries getting involved in our politics.
– RWW
Jul 3 at 20:52
Thanks for your answer, it appears that the penalties are rather stiff. Do you have any thoughts about making purchase for merchandise on their online store having these same restrictions?
– nikhil
Jul 1 at 3:17
Thanks for your answer, it appears that the penalties are rather stiff. Do you have any thoughts about making purchase for merchandise on their online store having these same restrictions?
– nikhil
Jul 1 at 3:17
6
6
@nikhil It’s a campaign contribution whether they give you merchandise for it or not.
– Joe
Jul 1 at 12:28
@nikhil It’s a campaign contribution whether they give you merchandise for it or not.
– Joe
Jul 1 at 12:28
2
2
A good link to include in the answer is the FEC's own page on this exact issue: fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/…
– cpcodes
Jul 1 at 23:54
A good link to include in the answer is the FEC's own page on this exact issue: fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/…
– cpcodes
Jul 1 at 23:54
1
1
I find it quite scary if buying, say, a hat, could result in getting deported! Is there really no specified (smallish) size of permitted (and possibly accidental) donation?
– nigel222
Jul 3 at 12:43
I find it quite scary if buying, say, a hat, could result in getting deported! Is there really no specified (smallish) size of permitted (and possibly accidental) donation?
– nigel222
Jul 3 at 12:43
People in the U.S., including a former president cnn.com/2019/06/28/politics/… , are still arguing about the effects of foreign influence on the last presidential election. Regardless of the size of donation, (most) Americans do not want other countries getting involved in our politics.
– RWW
Jul 3 at 20:52
People in the U.S., including a former president cnn.com/2019/06/28/politics/… , are still arguing about the effects of foreign influence on the last presidential election. Regardless of the size of donation, (most) Americans do not want other countries getting involved in our politics.
– RWW
Jul 3 at 20:52
add a comment |
Is buying merchandise also included in the scope
If the money goes to the campaign, yes. Presumably they are putting the notice there because the money is going to the campaign. E.g. Kamala Harris' campaign sells t-shirts and uses the proceeds to support the campaign.
I'm not sure what happens if you, as a foreign national, exhibit merchandise advertising a candidate. One of the complaints around the Citizens United decision was that it might allow foreign corporations to purchase merchandise to support a candidate. Justice Samuel Alito was adamant at the time that it would not do that.
The basic idea is that United States elections should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries. You may not feel that you belong in the same class as Vladimir Putin or Kim Jong Un, but from the legal standpoint, there is no difference. All are in the category of "not US citizens" that cannot spend on US campaigns. Without that, someone like Putin could give an individual some money and ask the individual to contribute. A more limited rule would then require that the US prove the Putin association to convict on the inappropriate contribution charge. This rule is much simpler to enforce.
1
@MartinBonner They might be more about advertising but they're at least partly about making money.
– David Richerby
Jul 1 at 13:07
6
The choice of prepositions in "should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries" is just about the worst possible one, given that this question is about what someone who is from another country but in the USA can do.
– Peter Taylor
Jul 1 at 14:13
1
@nikhil given that only citizens can vote, some may feel that non-citizens even those resident in the US shouldn't be able to influence the election directly
– eques
Jul 1 at 17:32
3
@nikhil but a "Green Card" represents a permanent (or presumably permanent) state compared to a visa holder which is presumed temporary (even if fairly long-term). So the argument could be made to allow Green Card holders to donate even though they cannot vote because they do have some vested interest in the country since they will remain here longer.
– eques
Jul 1 at 19:25
1
@MartinBonner If there was an independent retailer selling politically themed merchandise, I don't see how that in itself would be a problem. The issue would likely be finding someone who is legally making and selling those products without giving a cut to the campaigns.
– JMac
Jul 2 at 13:02
|
show 7 more comments
Is buying merchandise also included in the scope
If the money goes to the campaign, yes. Presumably they are putting the notice there because the money is going to the campaign. E.g. Kamala Harris' campaign sells t-shirts and uses the proceeds to support the campaign.
I'm not sure what happens if you, as a foreign national, exhibit merchandise advertising a candidate. One of the complaints around the Citizens United decision was that it might allow foreign corporations to purchase merchandise to support a candidate. Justice Samuel Alito was adamant at the time that it would not do that.
The basic idea is that United States elections should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries. You may not feel that you belong in the same class as Vladimir Putin or Kim Jong Un, but from the legal standpoint, there is no difference. All are in the category of "not US citizens" that cannot spend on US campaigns. Without that, someone like Putin could give an individual some money and ask the individual to contribute. A more limited rule would then require that the US prove the Putin association to convict on the inappropriate contribution charge. This rule is much simpler to enforce.
1
@MartinBonner They might be more about advertising but they're at least partly about making money.
– David Richerby
Jul 1 at 13:07
6
The choice of prepositions in "should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries" is just about the worst possible one, given that this question is about what someone who is from another country but in the USA can do.
– Peter Taylor
Jul 1 at 14:13
1
@nikhil given that only citizens can vote, some may feel that non-citizens even those resident in the US shouldn't be able to influence the election directly
– eques
Jul 1 at 17:32
3
@nikhil but a "Green Card" represents a permanent (or presumably permanent) state compared to a visa holder which is presumed temporary (even if fairly long-term). So the argument could be made to allow Green Card holders to donate even though they cannot vote because they do have some vested interest in the country since they will remain here longer.
– eques
Jul 1 at 19:25
1
@MartinBonner If there was an independent retailer selling politically themed merchandise, I don't see how that in itself would be a problem. The issue would likely be finding someone who is legally making and selling those products without giving a cut to the campaigns.
– JMac
Jul 2 at 13:02
|
show 7 more comments
Is buying merchandise also included in the scope
If the money goes to the campaign, yes. Presumably they are putting the notice there because the money is going to the campaign. E.g. Kamala Harris' campaign sells t-shirts and uses the proceeds to support the campaign.
I'm not sure what happens if you, as a foreign national, exhibit merchandise advertising a candidate. One of the complaints around the Citizens United decision was that it might allow foreign corporations to purchase merchandise to support a candidate. Justice Samuel Alito was adamant at the time that it would not do that.
The basic idea is that United States elections should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries. You may not feel that you belong in the same class as Vladimir Putin or Kim Jong Un, but from the legal standpoint, there is no difference. All are in the category of "not US citizens" that cannot spend on US campaigns. Without that, someone like Putin could give an individual some money and ask the individual to contribute. A more limited rule would then require that the US prove the Putin association to convict on the inappropriate contribution charge. This rule is much simpler to enforce.
Is buying merchandise also included in the scope
If the money goes to the campaign, yes. Presumably they are putting the notice there because the money is going to the campaign. E.g. Kamala Harris' campaign sells t-shirts and uses the proceeds to support the campaign.
I'm not sure what happens if you, as a foreign national, exhibit merchandise advertising a candidate. One of the complaints around the Citizens United decision was that it might allow foreign corporations to purchase merchandise to support a candidate. Justice Samuel Alito was adamant at the time that it would not do that.
The basic idea is that United States elections should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries. You may not feel that you belong in the same class as Vladimir Putin or Kim Jong Un, but from the legal standpoint, there is no difference. All are in the category of "not US citizens" that cannot spend on US campaigns. Without that, someone like Putin could give an individual some money and ask the individual to contribute. A more limited rule would then require that the US prove the Putin association to convict on the inappropriate contribution charge. This rule is much simpler to enforce.
edited Jul 1 at 16:29
Malady
1235 bronze badges
1235 bronze badges
answered Jul 1 at 10:35
BrythanBrythan
76.5k8 gold badges163 silver badges260 bronze badges
76.5k8 gold badges163 silver badges260 bronze badges
1
@MartinBonner They might be more about advertising but they're at least partly about making money.
– David Richerby
Jul 1 at 13:07
6
The choice of prepositions in "should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries" is just about the worst possible one, given that this question is about what someone who is from another country but in the USA can do.
– Peter Taylor
Jul 1 at 14:13
1
@nikhil given that only citizens can vote, some may feel that non-citizens even those resident in the US shouldn't be able to influence the election directly
– eques
Jul 1 at 17:32
3
@nikhil but a "Green Card" represents a permanent (or presumably permanent) state compared to a visa holder which is presumed temporary (even if fairly long-term). So the argument could be made to allow Green Card holders to donate even though they cannot vote because they do have some vested interest in the country since they will remain here longer.
– eques
Jul 1 at 19:25
1
@MartinBonner If there was an independent retailer selling politically themed merchandise, I don't see how that in itself would be a problem. The issue would likely be finding someone who is legally making and selling those products without giving a cut to the campaigns.
– JMac
Jul 2 at 13:02
|
show 7 more comments
1
@MartinBonner They might be more about advertising but they're at least partly about making money.
– David Richerby
Jul 1 at 13:07
6
The choice of prepositions in "should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries" is just about the worst possible one, given that this question is about what someone who is from another country but in the USA can do.
– Peter Taylor
Jul 1 at 14:13
1
@nikhil given that only citizens can vote, some may feel that non-citizens even those resident in the US shouldn't be able to influence the election directly
– eques
Jul 1 at 17:32
3
@nikhil but a "Green Card" represents a permanent (or presumably permanent) state compared to a visa holder which is presumed temporary (even if fairly long-term). So the argument could be made to allow Green Card holders to donate even though they cannot vote because they do have some vested interest in the country since they will remain here longer.
– eques
Jul 1 at 19:25
1
@MartinBonner If there was an independent retailer selling politically themed merchandise, I don't see how that in itself would be a problem. The issue would likely be finding someone who is legally making and selling those products without giving a cut to the campaigns.
– JMac
Jul 2 at 13:02
1
1
@MartinBonner They might be more about advertising but they're at least partly about making money.
– David Richerby
Jul 1 at 13:07
@MartinBonner They might be more about advertising but they're at least partly about making money.
– David Richerby
Jul 1 at 13:07
6
6
The choice of prepositions in "should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries" is just about the worst possible one, given that this question is about what someone who is from another country but in the USA can do.
– Peter Taylor
Jul 1 at 14:13
The choice of prepositions in "should be financed by people in the United States, not people or corporations from other countries" is just about the worst possible one, given that this question is about what someone who is from another country but in the USA can do.
– Peter Taylor
Jul 1 at 14:13
1
1
@nikhil given that only citizens can vote, some may feel that non-citizens even those resident in the US shouldn't be able to influence the election directly
– eques
Jul 1 at 17:32
@nikhil given that only citizens can vote, some may feel that non-citizens even those resident in the US shouldn't be able to influence the election directly
– eques
Jul 1 at 17:32
3
3
@nikhil but a "Green Card" represents a permanent (or presumably permanent) state compared to a visa holder which is presumed temporary (even if fairly long-term). So the argument could be made to allow Green Card holders to donate even though they cannot vote because they do have some vested interest in the country since they will remain here longer.
– eques
Jul 1 at 19:25
@nikhil but a "Green Card" represents a permanent (or presumably permanent) state compared to a visa holder which is presumed temporary (even if fairly long-term). So the argument could be made to allow Green Card holders to donate even though they cannot vote because they do have some vested interest in the country since they will remain here longer.
– eques
Jul 1 at 19:25
1
1
@MartinBonner If there was an independent retailer selling politically themed merchandise, I don't see how that in itself would be a problem. The issue would likely be finding someone who is legally making and selling those products without giving a cut to the campaigns.
– JMac
Jul 2 at 13:02
@MartinBonner If there was an independent retailer selling politically themed merchandise, I don't see how that in itself would be a problem. The issue would likely be finding someone who is legally making and selling those products without giving a cut to the campaigns.
– JMac
Jul 2 at 13:02
|
show 7 more comments
You can't contribute toward an election, but issue activism is the loophole. If you like the candidate because they's good on issues, find a organization that agrees with you on the issue -- the NRA, for instance, is awash in Russian money. If you like the candidate because they's a personal friend, find a nonprofit that donates to them, and donate to that nonprofit. If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law.
New contributor
If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law. – I don't get how this relates to the question on whether one is a US national or not. Why should US people allowed to do this?
– Paŭlo Ebermann
Jul 2 at 20:16
1
It's a collective. Money is one way we enable candidates that we like, to effect the change we want to see. I'm not going to defend this system, but that's how I understand it. If you're not a permanent resident or citizen, you're not part of the collective, and you may well be acting on behalf of a foreign power.
– Ion Freeman
Jul 2 at 20:36
1
Saying that NRA is "awash" in Russian money is outrageous. According to your source, they received "$2,512.85 in contributions and membership dues from people associated with Russian addresses.” That's not even guaranteed to be unethical. Every Fortune 500 operates in Russia and has an office in Moscow. Many of them are staffed by some Americans. So this is not even unusual.
– grovkin
Jul 3 at 19:45
1
@grovkin indeed. I'm no fan of the NRA, but I find two and a half grand from "people associated with Russian addresses" to be frankly small potatoes, and, as you note, probably entirely legitimate. Not only do some US citizens live in Russia, but many Russian citizens have green cards (making them eligible to donate to federal campaigns) yet may remain "associated with Russian addresses."
– phoog
Jul 4 at 1:53
add a comment |
You can't contribute toward an election, but issue activism is the loophole. If you like the candidate because they's good on issues, find a organization that agrees with you on the issue -- the NRA, for instance, is awash in Russian money. If you like the candidate because they's a personal friend, find a nonprofit that donates to them, and donate to that nonprofit. If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law.
New contributor
If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law. – I don't get how this relates to the question on whether one is a US national or not. Why should US people allowed to do this?
– Paŭlo Ebermann
Jul 2 at 20:16
1
It's a collective. Money is one way we enable candidates that we like, to effect the change we want to see. I'm not going to defend this system, but that's how I understand it. If you're not a permanent resident or citizen, you're not part of the collective, and you may well be acting on behalf of a foreign power.
– Ion Freeman
Jul 2 at 20:36
1
Saying that NRA is "awash" in Russian money is outrageous. According to your source, they received "$2,512.85 in contributions and membership dues from people associated with Russian addresses.” That's not even guaranteed to be unethical. Every Fortune 500 operates in Russia and has an office in Moscow. Many of them are staffed by some Americans. So this is not even unusual.
– grovkin
Jul 3 at 19:45
1
@grovkin indeed. I'm no fan of the NRA, but I find two and a half grand from "people associated with Russian addresses" to be frankly small potatoes, and, as you note, probably entirely legitimate. Not only do some US citizens live in Russia, but many Russian citizens have green cards (making them eligible to donate to federal campaigns) yet may remain "associated with Russian addresses."
– phoog
Jul 4 at 1:53
add a comment |
You can't contribute toward an election, but issue activism is the loophole. If you like the candidate because they's good on issues, find a organization that agrees with you on the issue -- the NRA, for instance, is awash in Russian money. If you like the candidate because they's a personal friend, find a nonprofit that donates to them, and donate to that nonprofit. If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law.
New contributor
You can't contribute toward an election, but issue activism is the loophole. If you like the candidate because they's good on issues, find a organization that agrees with you on the issue -- the NRA, for instance, is awash in Russian money. If you like the candidate because they's a personal friend, find a nonprofit that donates to them, and donate to that nonprofit. If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Jul 2 at 20:14
Ion FreemanIon Freeman
1492 bronze badges
1492 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law. – I don't get how this relates to the question on whether one is a US national or not. Why should US people allowed to do this?
– Paŭlo Ebermann
Jul 2 at 20:16
1
It's a collective. Money is one way we enable candidates that we like, to effect the change we want to see. I'm not going to defend this system, but that's how I understand it. If you're not a permanent resident or citizen, you're not part of the collective, and you may well be acting on behalf of a foreign power.
– Ion Freeman
Jul 2 at 20:36
1
Saying that NRA is "awash" in Russian money is outrageous. According to your source, they received "$2,512.85 in contributions and membership dues from people associated with Russian addresses.” That's not even guaranteed to be unethical. Every Fortune 500 operates in Russia and has an office in Moscow. Many of them are staffed by some Americans. So this is not even unusual.
– grovkin
Jul 3 at 19:45
1
@grovkin indeed. I'm no fan of the NRA, but I find two and a half grand from "people associated with Russian addresses" to be frankly small potatoes, and, as you note, probably entirely legitimate. Not only do some US citizens live in Russia, but many Russian citizens have green cards (making them eligible to donate to federal campaigns) yet may remain "associated with Russian addresses."
– phoog
Jul 4 at 1:53
add a comment |
If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law. – I don't get how this relates to the question on whether one is a US national or not. Why should US people allowed to do this?
– Paŭlo Ebermann
Jul 2 at 20:16
1
It's a collective. Money is one way we enable candidates that we like, to effect the change we want to see. I'm not going to defend this system, but that's how I understand it. If you're not a permanent resident or citizen, you're not part of the collective, and you may well be acting on behalf of a foreign power.
– Ion Freeman
Jul 2 at 20:36
1
Saying that NRA is "awash" in Russian money is outrageous. According to your source, they received "$2,512.85 in contributions and membership dues from people associated with Russian addresses.” That's not even guaranteed to be unethical. Every Fortune 500 operates in Russia and has an office in Moscow. Many of them are staffed by some Americans. So this is not even unusual.
– grovkin
Jul 3 at 19:45
1
@grovkin indeed. I'm no fan of the NRA, but I find two and a half grand from "people associated with Russian addresses" to be frankly small potatoes, and, as you note, probably entirely legitimate. Not only do some US citizens live in Russia, but many Russian citizens have green cards (making them eligible to donate to federal campaigns) yet may remain "associated with Russian addresses."
– phoog
Jul 4 at 1:53
If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law. – I don't get how this relates to the question on whether one is a US national or not. Why should US people allowed to do this?
– Paŭlo Ebermann
Jul 2 at 20:16
If you like the candidate because you want them to do something in exchange for the donation, that's why we have the law. – I don't get how this relates to the question on whether one is a US national or not. Why should US people allowed to do this?
– Paŭlo Ebermann
Jul 2 at 20:16
1
1
It's a collective. Money is one way we enable candidates that we like, to effect the change we want to see. I'm not going to defend this system, but that's how I understand it. If you're not a permanent resident or citizen, you're not part of the collective, and you may well be acting on behalf of a foreign power.
– Ion Freeman
Jul 2 at 20:36
It's a collective. Money is one way we enable candidates that we like, to effect the change we want to see. I'm not going to defend this system, but that's how I understand it. If you're not a permanent resident or citizen, you're not part of the collective, and you may well be acting on behalf of a foreign power.
– Ion Freeman
Jul 2 at 20:36
1
1
Saying that NRA is "awash" in Russian money is outrageous. According to your source, they received "$2,512.85 in contributions and membership dues from people associated with Russian addresses.” That's not even guaranteed to be unethical. Every Fortune 500 operates in Russia and has an office in Moscow. Many of them are staffed by some Americans. So this is not even unusual.
– grovkin
Jul 3 at 19:45
Saying that NRA is "awash" in Russian money is outrageous. According to your source, they received "$2,512.85 in contributions and membership dues from people associated with Russian addresses.” That's not even guaranteed to be unethical. Every Fortune 500 operates in Russia and has an office in Moscow. Many of them are staffed by some Americans. So this is not even unusual.
– grovkin
Jul 3 at 19:45
1
1
@grovkin indeed. I'm no fan of the NRA, but I find two and a half grand from "people associated with Russian addresses" to be frankly small potatoes, and, as you note, probably entirely legitimate. Not only do some US citizens live in Russia, but many Russian citizens have green cards (making them eligible to donate to federal campaigns) yet may remain "associated with Russian addresses."
– phoog
Jul 4 at 1:53
@grovkin indeed. I'm no fan of the NRA, but I find two and a half grand from "people associated with Russian addresses" to be frankly small potatoes, and, as you note, probably entirely legitimate. Not only do some US citizens live in Russia, but many Russian citizens have green cards (making them eligible to donate to federal campaigns) yet may remain "associated with Russian addresses."
– phoog
Jul 4 at 1:53
add a comment |
FEC has a page detailing foreign nationals' rights in this regard.
It's not long. And it aims at informing the general public (so no specific prior legal knowledge is required). Although, for the interested, it does have the relevant legal references.
For example, despite some of the comments, a foreign national may not "direct, dictate, control, or directly or indirectly participate in the decision-making process with regard to any election-related activities. Such activities include, the making of contributions, donations...
add a comment |
FEC has a page detailing foreign nationals' rights in this regard.
It's not long. And it aims at informing the general public (so no specific prior legal knowledge is required). Although, for the interested, it does have the relevant legal references.
For example, despite some of the comments, a foreign national may not "direct, dictate, control, or directly or indirectly participate in the decision-making process with regard to any election-related activities. Such activities include, the making of contributions, donations...
add a comment |
FEC has a page detailing foreign nationals' rights in this regard.
It's not long. And it aims at informing the general public (so no specific prior legal knowledge is required). Although, for the interested, it does have the relevant legal references.
For example, despite some of the comments, a foreign national may not "direct, dictate, control, or directly or indirectly participate in the decision-making process with regard to any election-related activities. Such activities include, the making of contributions, donations...
FEC has a page detailing foreign nationals' rights in this regard.
It's not long. And it aims at informing the general public (so no specific prior legal knowledge is required). Although, for the interested, it does have the relevant legal references.
For example, despite some of the comments, a foreign national may not "direct, dictate, control, or directly or indirectly participate in the decision-making process with regard to any election-related activities. Such activities include, the making of contributions, donations...
edited Jul 4 at 18:15
answered Jul 3 at 19:38
grovkingrovkin
3,3942 gold badges14 silver badges41 bronze badges
3,3942 gold badges14 silver badges41 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
According to FEC.gov only citizens and green-card holders can spend money or donate things of value. As a non-resident you are prohibited from:
- Making any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or making any expenditure, independent expenditure, or
disbursement in connection with any federal, state or local election
in the United States;
- Making any contribution or donation to any committee or organization of any national, state, district, or local political party (including
donations to a party nonfederal account or office building account);
- Making any disbursement for an electioneering communication;
- Making any donation to a presidential inaugural committee.
However you can volunteer your time, as long as you aren't making decisions involving money:
Generally, an individual (including a foreign national) may volunteer
personal services to a federal candidate or federal political
committee without making a contribution. The Act provides this
volunteer "exemption" as long as the individual performing the service
is not compensated by anyone.
It also looks like you might be able to work at the polls in Georgia and Idaho, those are the only 2 states which don't require you to be an eligible voter to do that.
New contributor
add a comment |
According to FEC.gov only citizens and green-card holders can spend money or donate things of value. As a non-resident you are prohibited from:
- Making any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or making any expenditure, independent expenditure, or
disbursement in connection with any federal, state or local election
in the United States;
- Making any contribution or donation to any committee or organization of any national, state, district, or local political party (including
donations to a party nonfederal account or office building account);
- Making any disbursement for an electioneering communication;
- Making any donation to a presidential inaugural committee.
However you can volunteer your time, as long as you aren't making decisions involving money:
Generally, an individual (including a foreign national) may volunteer
personal services to a federal candidate or federal political
committee without making a contribution. The Act provides this
volunteer "exemption" as long as the individual performing the service
is not compensated by anyone.
It also looks like you might be able to work at the polls in Georgia and Idaho, those are the only 2 states which don't require you to be an eligible voter to do that.
New contributor
add a comment |
According to FEC.gov only citizens and green-card holders can spend money or donate things of value. As a non-resident you are prohibited from:
- Making any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or making any expenditure, independent expenditure, or
disbursement in connection with any federal, state or local election
in the United States;
- Making any contribution or donation to any committee or organization of any national, state, district, or local political party (including
donations to a party nonfederal account or office building account);
- Making any disbursement for an electioneering communication;
- Making any donation to a presidential inaugural committee.
However you can volunteer your time, as long as you aren't making decisions involving money:
Generally, an individual (including a foreign national) may volunteer
personal services to a federal candidate or federal political
committee without making a contribution. The Act provides this
volunteer "exemption" as long as the individual performing the service
is not compensated by anyone.
It also looks like you might be able to work at the polls in Georgia and Idaho, those are the only 2 states which don't require you to be an eligible voter to do that.
New contributor
According to FEC.gov only citizens and green-card holders can spend money or donate things of value. As a non-resident you are prohibited from:
- Making any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or making any expenditure, independent expenditure, or
disbursement in connection with any federal, state or local election
in the United States;
- Making any contribution or donation to any committee or organization of any national, state, district, or local political party (including
donations to a party nonfederal account or office building account);
- Making any disbursement for an electioneering communication;
- Making any donation to a presidential inaugural committee.
However you can volunteer your time, as long as you aren't making decisions involving money:
Generally, an individual (including a foreign national) may volunteer
personal services to a federal candidate or federal political
committee without making a contribution. The Act provides this
volunteer "exemption" as long as the individual performing the service
is not compensated by anyone.
It also looks like you might be able to work at the polls in Georgia and Idaho, those are the only 2 states which don't require you to be an eligible voter to do that.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Jul 2 at 14:15
axusaxus
212 bronze badges
212 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42593%2fcontributing-to-a-candidate-as-a-foreign-national-us-resident%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You might be able to create a company and then donate on behalf of the company, but the law seems vague about this...
– spacetyper
Jul 2 at 8:42