Is SpaceX propulsively deorbiting a Starlink satellite already?What are these four “debris” objects along with the Starlink satellites?Would Mayak's large solar reflector have produced a stable attitude, or more likely start tumbling or rotating?What technology will SpaceX's StarLink satellites most likely use for sat-to-sat linking?How are satellites made “demisable” and what else do recent FAA documents tell us about SpaceX's plans for StarLink satellites?How will Starlink satellites be capable of tracking on-orbit debris and autonomously avoiding collision?Why will Starlink satellites use krypton instead of xenon for electric propulsion?How will Starlink satellites deploy from the fairing and reach their orbits?Is the Starlink array really visible from Earth?Delta-V of Starlink SatellitesWhat are these four “debris” objects along with the Starlink satellites?Would SpaceX's Starlink constellation contribute inordinately to space debris?
Appropriate conduit for several data cables underground over 300' run
How do ballistic trajectories work in a ring world?
Findminimum of Integral
How to use Adostop Eco stop bath?
What kind of Chinook helicopter/airplane hybrid is this?
Tikz people in diagram
Who goes first? Person disembarking bus or the bicycle?
Why the Cauchy Distribution is so useful?
How do I separate enchants from items?
When do flights get cancelled due to fog?
Gaining Proficiency in Vehicles (water)
What are the effects of abstaining from eating a certain flavor?
How do I explain that I don't want to maintain old projects?
Wires do not connect in Circuitikz
Four ships at the ocean with the same distance
My professor has told me he will be the corresponding author. Will it hurt my future career?
Was it ever illegal to name a pig "Napoleon" in France?
Tesco's Burger Relish Best Before End date number
Is there an In-Universe reason why Thor and the Asgardians think Rocket is a rabbit?
What is the relationship between external and internal composition in a cartesian closed category?
Is it ok for parents to kiss and romance with each other while their 2- to 8-year-old child watches?
What was the profession 芸者 (female entertainer) called in Russia?
What is the average number of draws it takes before you can not draw any more cards from the Deck of Many Things?
How can I know how much authority/decision making power etc I have as an employee?
Is SpaceX propulsively deorbiting a Starlink satellite already?
What are these four “debris” objects along with the Starlink satellites?Would Mayak's large solar reflector have produced a stable attitude, or more likely start tumbling or rotating?What technology will SpaceX's StarLink satellites most likely use for sat-to-sat linking?How are satellites made “demisable” and what else do recent FAA documents tell us about SpaceX's plans for StarLink satellites?How will Starlink satellites be capable of tracking on-orbit debris and autonomously avoiding collision?Why will Starlink satellites use krypton instead of xenon for electric propulsion?How will Starlink satellites deploy from the fairing and reach their orbits?Is the Starlink array really visible from Earth?Delta-V of Starlink SatellitesWhat are these four “debris” objects along with the Starlink satellites?Would SpaceX's Starlink constellation contribute inordinately to space debris?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The plot below shows that most of the SpaceX Starlink satellites have moved from circa 450 km to circa 550 kilometers already, using their argon-based ion engines.
A few, along with four unidentified debris objects have remained at 450 km.
But one has moved down to 390 km.
Since it's only one object and six have remained around 450 km, it makes me wonder if this is active, propulsive deorbiting, or if this is how fast these big flat satellites would decay without propulsion or attitude control.
Question: Is SpaceX propulsively deorbiting a Starlink satellite already?
plotted using https://pastebin.com/cFLhTJVq From What are these four “debris” objects along with the Starlink satellites?
spacex orbital-maneuver starlink deorbit
asked Jun 29 at 3:55
uhohuhoh
45.7k22 gold badges182 silver badges596 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The plot below shows that most of the SpaceX Starlink satellites have moved from circa 450 km to circa 550 kilometers already, using their argon-based ion engines.
A few, along with four unidentified debris objects have remained at 450 km.
But one has moved down to 390 km.
Since it's only one object and six have remained around 450 km, it makes me wonder if this is active, propulsive deorbiting, or if this is how fast these big flat satellites would decay without propulsion or attitude control.
Question: Is SpaceX propulsively deorbiting a Starlink satellite already?
plotted using https://pastebin.com/cFLhTJVq From What are these four “debris” objects along with the Starlink satellites?
spacex orbital-maneuver starlink deorbit
asked Jun 29 at 3:55
uhohuhoh
45.7k22 gold badges182 silver badges596 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The plot below shows that most of the SpaceX Starlink satellites have moved from circa 450 km to circa 550 kilometers already, using their argon-based ion engines.
A few, along with four unidentified debris objects have remained at 450 km.
But one has moved down to 390 km.
Since it's only one object and six have remained around 450 km, it makes me wonder if this is active, propulsive deorbiting, or if this is how fast these big flat satellites would decay without propulsion or attitude control.
Question: Is SpaceX propulsively deorbiting a Starlink satellite already?
plotted using https://pastebin.com/cFLhTJVq From What are these four “debris” objects along with the Starlink satellites?
spacex orbital-maneuver starlink deorbit
asked Jun 29 at 3:55
uhohuhoh
45.7k22 gold badges182 silver badges596 bronze badges
$endgroup$
The plot below shows that most of the SpaceX Starlink satellites have moved from circa 450 km to circa 550 kilometers already, using their argon-based ion engines.
A few, along with four unidentified debris objects have remained at 450 km.
But one has moved down to 390 km.
Since it's only one object and six have remained around 450 km, it makes me wonder if this is active, propulsive deorbiting, or if this is how fast these big flat satellites would decay without propulsion or attitude control.
Question: Is SpaceX propulsively deorbiting a Starlink satellite already?
plotted using https://pastebin.com/cFLhTJVq From What are these four “debris” objects along with the Starlink satellites?
spacex orbital-maneuver starlink deorbit
spacex orbital-maneuver starlink deorbit
asked Jun 29 at 3:55
uhohuhoh
45.7k22 gold badges182 silver badges596 bronze badges
asked Jun 29 at 3:55
uhohuhoh
45.7k22 gold badges182 silver badges596 bronze badges
edited Jun 29 at 4:30
uhoh
asked Jun 29 at 3:55
uhohuhoh
45.7k22 gold badges182 silver badges596 bronze badges
asked Jun 29 at 3:55
uhohuhoh
45.7k22 gold badges182 silver badges596 bronze badges
asked Jun 29 at 3:55
uhohuhoh
45.7k22 gold badges182 silver badges596 bronze badges
45.7k22 gold badges182 silver badges596 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes!
The current status (end of June 2019) according to a SpaceX statement via Michael Sheetz
is:
- 45 in final orbits
- 5 still raising, in final orbits shortly
- 5 paused during raise for adjustments, will continue
- 2 intentionally being deorbited to show debris disposal
- 3 stopped communicating, "passively" deorbiting
answered Jun 29 at 6:23
jkavalikjkavalik
4,1271 gold badge15 silver badges41 bronze badges
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"show" as in PR or as in "demonstrate a regulatory requirement"?
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
Jun 29 at 8:05
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag the original wording seems to be "to simulate an end of life disposal" so I would say "test" instead of "show" but I kept the source tweet.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jun 29 at 8:10
1
$begingroup$
I'm wondering why they didn't built in the fail safe that if communication to one of the satellites stop they actively deorbit. That would be good for keeping the crowded region cleaner and they wouldn't have to deorbit functional satellites but rather just get rid of their trash.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 6:34
2
$begingroup$
@GittingGud well, probably depends on why they do not communicate - either loss of attitude control or loss of electricity would not allow for any "automatic" actions.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jul 1 at 16:25
1
$begingroup$
@jkavalik You're right I didn't think about the reason why the lost communication is likely to be misaligned solar panels and loss of electricity.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 16:34
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37017%2fis-spacex-propulsively-deorbiting-a-starlink-satellite-already%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes!
The current status (end of June 2019) according to a SpaceX statement via Michael Sheetz
is:
- 45 in final orbits
- 5 still raising, in final orbits shortly
- 5 paused during raise for adjustments, will continue
- 2 intentionally being deorbited to show debris disposal
- 3 stopped communicating, "passively" deorbiting
answered Jun 29 at 6:23
jkavalikjkavalik
4,1271 gold badge15 silver badges41 bronze badges
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"show" as in PR or as in "demonstrate a regulatory requirement"?
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
Jun 29 at 8:05
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag the original wording seems to be "to simulate an end of life disposal" so I would say "test" instead of "show" but I kept the source tweet.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jun 29 at 8:10
1
$begingroup$
I'm wondering why they didn't built in the fail safe that if communication to one of the satellites stop they actively deorbit. That would be good for keeping the crowded region cleaner and they wouldn't have to deorbit functional satellites but rather just get rid of their trash.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 6:34
2
$begingroup$
@GittingGud well, probably depends on why they do not communicate - either loss of attitude control or loss of electricity would not allow for any "automatic" actions.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jul 1 at 16:25
1
$begingroup$
@jkavalik You're right I didn't think about the reason why the lost communication is likely to be misaligned solar panels and loss of electricity.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 16:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Yes!
The current status (end of June 2019) according to a SpaceX statement via Michael Sheetz
is:
- 45 in final orbits
- 5 still raising, in final orbits shortly
- 5 paused during raise for adjustments, will continue
- 2 intentionally being deorbited to show debris disposal
- 3 stopped communicating, "passively" deorbiting
answered Jun 29 at 6:23
jkavalikjkavalik
4,1271 gold badge15 silver badges41 bronze badges
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"show" as in PR or as in "demonstrate a regulatory requirement"?
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
Jun 29 at 8:05
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag the original wording seems to be "to simulate an end of life disposal" so I would say "test" instead of "show" but I kept the source tweet.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jun 29 at 8:10
1
$begingroup$
I'm wondering why they didn't built in the fail safe that if communication to one of the satellites stop they actively deorbit. That would be good for keeping the crowded region cleaner and they wouldn't have to deorbit functional satellites but rather just get rid of their trash.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 6:34
2
$begingroup$
@GittingGud well, probably depends on why they do not communicate - either loss of attitude control or loss of electricity would not allow for any "automatic" actions.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jul 1 at 16:25
1
$begingroup$
@jkavalik You're right I didn't think about the reason why the lost communication is likely to be misaligned solar panels and loss of electricity.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 16:34
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Yes!
The current status (end of June 2019) according to a SpaceX statement via Michael Sheetz
is:
- 45 in final orbits
- 5 still raising, in final orbits shortly
- 5 paused during raise for adjustments, will continue
- 2 intentionally being deorbited to show debris disposal
- 3 stopped communicating, "passively" deorbiting
answered Jun 29 at 6:23
jkavalikjkavalik
4,1271 gold badge15 silver badges41 bronze badges
$endgroup$
Yes!
The current status (end of June 2019) according to a SpaceX statement via Michael Sheetz
is:
- 45 in final orbits
- 5 still raising, in final orbits shortly
- 5 paused during raise for adjustments, will continue
- 2 intentionally being deorbited to show debris disposal
- 3 stopped communicating, "passively" deorbiting
answered Jun 29 at 6:23
jkavalikjkavalik
4,1271 gold badge15 silver badges41 bronze badges
answered Jun 29 at 6:23
jkavalikjkavalik
4,1271 gold badge15 silver badges41 bronze badges
answered Jun 29 at 6:23
jkavalikjkavalik
4,1271 gold badge15 silver badges41 bronze badges
answered Jun 29 at 6:23
jkavalikjkavalik
4,1271 gold badge15 silver badges41 bronze badges
4,1271 gold badge15 silver badges41 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
"show" as in PR or as in "demonstrate a regulatory requirement"?
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
Jun 29 at 8:05
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag the original wording seems to be "to simulate an end of life disposal" so I would say "test" instead of "show" but I kept the source tweet.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jun 29 at 8:10
1
$begingroup$
I'm wondering why they didn't built in the fail safe that if communication to one of the satellites stop they actively deorbit. That would be good for keeping the crowded region cleaner and they wouldn't have to deorbit functional satellites but rather just get rid of their trash.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 6:34
2
$begingroup$
@GittingGud well, probably depends on why they do not communicate - either loss of attitude control or loss of electricity would not allow for any "automatic" actions.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jul 1 at 16:25
1
$begingroup$
@jkavalik You're right I didn't think about the reason why the lost communication is likely to be misaligned solar panels and loss of electricity.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 16:34
|
show 1 more comment
2
$begingroup$
"show" as in PR or as in "demonstrate a regulatory requirement"?
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
Jun 29 at 8:05
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag the original wording seems to be "to simulate an end of life disposal" so I would say "test" instead of "show" but I kept the source tweet.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jun 29 at 8:10
1
$begingroup$
I'm wondering why they didn't built in the fail safe that if communication to one of the satellites stop they actively deorbit. That would be good for keeping the crowded region cleaner and they wouldn't have to deorbit functional satellites but rather just get rid of their trash.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 6:34
2
$begingroup$
@GittingGud well, probably depends on why they do not communicate - either loss of attitude control or loss of electricity would not allow for any "automatic" actions.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jul 1 at 16:25
1
$begingroup$
@jkavalik You're right I didn't think about the reason why the lost communication is likely to be misaligned solar panels and loss of electricity.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 16:34
2
2
$begingroup$
"show" as in PR or as in "demonstrate a regulatory requirement"?
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
Jun 29 at 8:05
$begingroup$
"show" as in PR or as in "demonstrate a regulatory requirement"?
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
Jun 29 at 8:05
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag the original wording seems to be "to simulate an end of life disposal" so I would say "test" instead of "show" but I kept the source tweet.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jun 29 at 8:10
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag the original wording seems to be "to simulate an end of life disposal" so I would say "test" instead of "show" but I kept the source tweet.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jun 29 at 8:10
1
1
$begingroup$
I'm wondering why they didn't built in the fail safe that if communication to one of the satellites stop they actively deorbit. That would be good for keeping the crowded region cleaner and they wouldn't have to deorbit functional satellites but rather just get rid of their trash.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 6:34
$begingroup$
I'm wondering why they didn't built in the fail safe that if communication to one of the satellites stop they actively deorbit. That would be good for keeping the crowded region cleaner and they wouldn't have to deorbit functional satellites but rather just get rid of their trash.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 6:34
2
2
$begingroup$
@GittingGud well, probably depends on why they do not communicate - either loss of attitude control or loss of electricity would not allow for any "automatic" actions.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jul 1 at 16:25
$begingroup$
@GittingGud well, probably depends on why they do not communicate - either loss of attitude control or loss of electricity would not allow for any "automatic" actions.
$endgroup$
– jkavalik
Jul 1 at 16:25
1
1
$begingroup$
@jkavalik You're right I didn't think about the reason why the lost communication is likely to be misaligned solar panels and loss of electricity.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 16:34
$begingroup$
@jkavalik You're right I didn't think about the reason why the lost communication is likely to be misaligned solar panels and loss of electricity.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
Jul 1 at 16:34
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37017%2fis-spacex-propulsively-deorbiting-a-starlink-satellite-already%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
