Why do people keep referring to Leia as Princess Leia, even after the destruction of Alderaan?Why is Leia a princess?When did Leia drop the “princess”Who was Viceroy Bail Organa's King/Sovereign?Are the children of Han and Leia also royalty?Is Kylo Ren a prince?When did Leia drop the “princess”Why was Princess Leia in the Battle of Scarif?Is Leia still a princess in the new canon?Why did Leia keep Organa as her last name?How did Bail Organa and his wife explain the sudden appearance of a baby girl named Leia?Why doesn't Princess Leia go straight to Yavin IV?Did Leia know she was adopted?
Can Error correction and detection be done with out adding extra bits?
What is this green alien supposed to be on the American covers of the "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"?
What are the basics of commands in Minecraft Java Edition?
How would you say "Sorry, that was a mistake on my part"?
Round command argument before using
Last-minute canceled work-trip mean I'll lose thousands of dollars on planned vacation
In this iconic lunar orbit rendezvous photo of John Houbolt, why do arrows #5 and #6 point the "wrong" way?
Arithmetics in LuaLaTeX
Company looks for long-term employees, but I know I won't be interested in staying long
Operation Unzalgo
Should I have shared a document with a former employee?
Why were these characters absent in Spider-Man: Far From Home?
Practical example in using (homotopy) type theory
How to interpret a promising preprint that was never published?
Should I use a resistor between the gate driver and MOSFET (gate pin)?
Demographic consequences of closed loop reincarnation
We get more abuse than anyone else
Why teach C using scanf without talking about command line arguments?
Why isn't a binary file shown as 0s and 1s?
I have found a mistake on someone's code published online: what is the protocol?
Why are there few or no black super GMs?
The most secure way to handle someone forgetting to verify their account?
Is encryption still applied if you ignore the SSL certificate warning for self signed?
How slow can a car engine run?
Why do people keep referring to Leia as Princess Leia, even after the destruction of Alderaan?
Why is Leia a princess?When did Leia drop the “princess”Who was Viceroy Bail Organa's King/Sovereign?Are the children of Han and Leia also royalty?Is Kylo Ren a prince?When did Leia drop the “princess”Why was Princess Leia in the Battle of Scarif?Is Leia still a princess in the new canon?Why did Leia keep Organa as her last name?How did Bail Organa and his wife explain the sudden appearance of a baby girl named Leia?Why doesn't Princess Leia go straight to Yavin IV?Did Leia know she was adopted?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I know that Leia was referred to as a princess from the start of A New Hope on account of her being the daughter Bail and Breha Organa - despite the fact that she was adopted. Her royal status undoubtedly stems from position on Aldaraan, rather than any connection to the royal family of Naboo through her birth mother.
Midway through the film, Aldaraan - and, by extension, its monarchy - are obliterated. Yet people still continue referring to Leia as Princess Leia.
HAN: Well, Your Highness, I guess this is it.
LEIA: That's right.
HAN: Don't get all mushy on me. So long, Princess.
(The Empire Strikes Back)
Eventually, of course, she becomes General Organa. But she seems to be known as Princess Leia for much of the Original Trilogy, despite not having a planet to be a princess for.
Why don't people just refer to her as Leia?
star-wars princess-leia
asked Jul 9 at 9:54
The Dark LordThe Dark Lord
42.1k23 gold badges210 silver badges338 bronze badges
|
show 12 more comments
I know that Leia was referred to as a princess from the start of A New Hope on account of her being the daughter Bail and Breha Organa - despite the fact that she was adopted. Her royal status undoubtedly stems from position on Aldaraan, rather than any connection to the royal family of Naboo through her birth mother.
Midway through the film, Aldaraan - and, by extension, its monarchy - are obliterated. Yet people still continue referring to Leia as Princess Leia.
HAN: Well, Your Highness, I guess this is it.
LEIA: That's right.
HAN: Don't get all mushy on me. So long, Princess.
(The Empire Strikes Back)
Eventually, of course, she becomes General Organa. But she seems to be known as Princess Leia for much of the Original Trilogy, despite not having a planet to be a princess for.
Why don't people just refer to her as Leia?
star-wars princess-leia
asked Jul 9 at 9:54
The Dark LordThe Dark Lord
42.1k23 gold badges210 silver badges338 bronze badges
24
You're still a princess if a daughter of a king or queen regardless of your actual day to day duties.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:00
41
That sort of thing happens in our galaxy too. The widow Jones may still be called Mrs. Jones even though Mr. Jones is dead. Contemporary Romanoffs use titles such as Duke and Duchess, Prince and Princess, although there is no longer a Russian Monarchy for them to rule. On the TV news you often hear ex-governors and ex-senators addressed as "Governor" and "Senator". Go figure.
– user14111
Jul 9 at 11:00
28
Alderaan isn't a place. It never was. It's where Leia's people stand! As long as they're alive, then... er... oh, right, they're all dead too.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 9 at 16:40
6
@PaulD.Waite Surely there must have been some other Alderaanians offworld at the time it was destroyed.
– JAB
Jul 10 at 2:24
5
Because Lucas was playing the long game and that was the only way for Leia to become a Disney princess.
– reirab
Jul 11 at 1:32
|
show 12 more comments
I know that Leia was referred to as a princess from the start of A New Hope on account of her being the daughter Bail and Breha Organa - despite the fact that she was adopted. Her royal status undoubtedly stems from position on Aldaraan, rather than any connection to the royal family of Naboo through her birth mother.
Midway through the film, Aldaraan - and, by extension, its monarchy - are obliterated. Yet people still continue referring to Leia as Princess Leia.
HAN: Well, Your Highness, I guess this is it.
LEIA: That's right.
HAN: Don't get all mushy on me. So long, Princess.
(The Empire Strikes Back)
Eventually, of course, she becomes General Organa. But she seems to be known as Princess Leia for much of the Original Trilogy, despite not having a planet to be a princess for.
Why don't people just refer to her as Leia?
star-wars princess-leia
asked Jul 9 at 9:54
The Dark LordThe Dark Lord
42.1k23 gold badges210 silver badges338 bronze badges
I know that Leia was referred to as a princess from the start of A New Hope on account of her being the daughter Bail and Breha Organa - despite the fact that she was adopted. Her royal status undoubtedly stems from position on Aldaraan, rather than any connection to the royal family of Naboo through her birth mother.
Midway through the film, Aldaraan - and, by extension, its monarchy - are obliterated. Yet people still continue referring to Leia as Princess Leia.
HAN: Well, Your Highness, I guess this is it.
LEIA: That's right.
HAN: Don't get all mushy on me. So long, Princess.
(The Empire Strikes Back)
Eventually, of course, she becomes General Organa. But she seems to be known as Princess Leia for much of the Original Trilogy, despite not having a planet to be a princess for.
Why don't people just refer to her as Leia?
star-wars princess-leia
star-wars princess-leia
asked Jul 9 at 9:54
The Dark LordThe Dark Lord
42.1k23 gold badges210 silver badges338 bronze badges
asked Jul 9 at 9:54
The Dark LordThe Dark Lord
42.1k23 gold badges210 silver badges338 bronze badges
edited Jul 12 at 9:26
The Dark Lord
asked Jul 9 at 9:54
The Dark LordThe Dark Lord
42.1k23 gold badges210 silver badges338 bronze badges
asked Jul 9 at 9:54
The Dark LordThe Dark Lord
42.1k23 gold badges210 silver badges338 bronze badges
asked Jul 9 at 9:54
The Dark LordThe Dark Lord
42.1k23 gold badges210 silver badges338 bronze badges
42.1k23 gold badges210 silver badges338 bronze badges
24
You're still a princess if a daughter of a king or queen regardless of your actual day to day duties.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:00
41
That sort of thing happens in our galaxy too. The widow Jones may still be called Mrs. Jones even though Mr. Jones is dead. Contemporary Romanoffs use titles such as Duke and Duchess, Prince and Princess, although there is no longer a Russian Monarchy for them to rule. On the TV news you often hear ex-governors and ex-senators addressed as "Governor" and "Senator". Go figure.
– user14111
Jul 9 at 11:00
28
Alderaan isn't a place. It never was. It's where Leia's people stand! As long as they're alive, then... er... oh, right, they're all dead too.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 9 at 16:40
6
@PaulD.Waite Surely there must have been some other Alderaanians offworld at the time it was destroyed.
– JAB
Jul 10 at 2:24
5
Because Lucas was playing the long game and that was the only way for Leia to become a Disney princess.
– reirab
Jul 11 at 1:32
|
show 12 more comments
24
You're still a princess if a daughter of a king or queen regardless of your actual day to day duties.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:00
41
That sort of thing happens in our galaxy too. The widow Jones may still be called Mrs. Jones even though Mr. Jones is dead. Contemporary Romanoffs use titles such as Duke and Duchess, Prince and Princess, although there is no longer a Russian Monarchy for them to rule. On the TV news you often hear ex-governors and ex-senators addressed as "Governor" and "Senator". Go figure.
– user14111
Jul 9 at 11:00
28
Alderaan isn't a place. It never was. It's where Leia's people stand! As long as they're alive, then... er... oh, right, they're all dead too.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 9 at 16:40
6
@PaulD.Waite Surely there must have been some other Alderaanians offworld at the time it was destroyed.
– JAB
Jul 10 at 2:24
5
Because Lucas was playing the long game and that was the only way for Leia to become a Disney princess.
– reirab
Jul 11 at 1:32
24
24
You're still a princess if a daughter of a king or queen regardless of your actual day to day duties.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:00
You're still a princess if a daughter of a king or queen regardless of your actual day to day duties.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:00
41
41
That sort of thing happens in our galaxy too. The widow Jones may still be called Mrs. Jones even though Mr. Jones is dead. Contemporary Romanoffs use titles such as Duke and Duchess, Prince and Princess, although there is no longer a Russian Monarchy for them to rule. On the TV news you often hear ex-governors and ex-senators addressed as "Governor" and "Senator". Go figure.
– user14111
Jul 9 at 11:00
That sort of thing happens in our galaxy too. The widow Jones may still be called Mrs. Jones even though Mr. Jones is dead. Contemporary Romanoffs use titles such as Duke and Duchess, Prince and Princess, although there is no longer a Russian Monarchy for them to rule. On the TV news you often hear ex-governors and ex-senators addressed as "Governor" and "Senator". Go figure.
– user14111
Jul 9 at 11:00
28
28
Alderaan isn't a place. It never was. It's where Leia's people stand! As long as they're alive, then... er... oh, right, they're all dead too.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 9 at 16:40
Alderaan isn't a place. It never was. It's where Leia's people stand! As long as they're alive, then... er... oh, right, they're all dead too.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 9 at 16:40
6
6
@PaulD.Waite Surely there must have been some other Alderaanians offworld at the time it was destroyed.
– JAB
Jul 10 at 2:24
@PaulD.Waite Surely there must have been some other Alderaanians offworld at the time it was destroyed.
– JAB
Jul 10 at 2:24
5
5
Because Lucas was playing the long game and that was the only way for Leia to become a Disney princess.
– reirab
Jul 11 at 1:32
Because Lucas was playing the long game and that was the only way for Leia to become a Disney princess.
– reirab
Jul 11 at 1:32
|
show 12 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
Whether she is still technically a princess or not is up for debate but I'd argue that it doesn't really matter if she is or not, there are other reasons to call her a princess.
Out of respect
Lor San Tekka explains this point quite clearly in The Force Awakens, it is still respectful to call her a princess even if the place she was a princess is now gone.
Poe: Well, because of you now we have a chance. The General's been after this for a long time.
Lor San Tekka: "The General." To me, she's royalty.
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
That's what they know her by
It would be odd to instantly call someone else and against your nature to instantly call someone else by another name. Heck I still (it's only been a month and a half!) refer to my wife as girlfriend in my head and sometimes use her maiden name. Things take time to get used to and adjust to.
In addition to this point it is easier to refer to someone as their common and most well known name than the new version of it. Tarkin does this in ANH when alerting people about her because it is what they know her by and princess is quicker than Leia Organa. It just makes communication easier initially.
Tarkin: The princess! Put all sections on alert!
Star Wars: A New Hope
In Han's (and sometime Vader's) case to mock
One of the best cases I think is the quote you use in the question, Han uses princess to mock her, note how he often emphasises it when talking. As he grows fonder of her this changes to be more playful but still used in a jokingly kind of way.
Han: Well, Your Highness, I guess this is it.
Leia: That's right.
Han: Don't get all mushy on me. So long, Princess.
Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back
answered Jul 9 at 10:45
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
68.7k29 gold badges449 silver badges493 bronze badges
7
My husband and I have not relinquished former titles: so we'll often refer to hanging out with "a friend" (each other), "my boy/girlfriend","my fiancé/e." So no need to stop calling her a girlfriend -- just confuse people and say you're sneaking out with your girlfriend!
– April
Jul 9 at 19:08
25
"What do you think, princ ... oh, right, I forgot, your entire family was wiped out. Ms. Leia, then" would probably not go over well.
– Acccumulation
Jul 9 at 19:32
1
When did Vader mock her?
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 22:10
Even after the Noghri learn that the name, Mal'ary'ush, or "Daughter of the Savior", stems from a misnomer, they still call her The Lady Vader out of respect (and because that's what they know her by), somewhat to her own chagrin.
– Mazura
Jul 10 at 16:40
add a comment |
Leia was adopted as a baby by Senator Organa and Queen Breha Organa, this makes her a princess. You're still a princess regardless of your duties on a day to day basis - you don't actually need to rule anywhere to maintain your status.
A comment on a similar question expands:
A "princess" is a title not limited to daughters of kings and queens.
It just happens to be the title also used for daughters of kings and
queens. Whether her mother was a queen or not when Leia was born
doesn't make a difference. If she comes from a princely family, she is
a princess. And adoption by a queen would also make her a princess.
Prince Charles princely title is indeed the "Prince of Wales" (Wales
is a principality) and the husband of Queen Elizabeth is also a
"prince" despite not being the son of a king or queen.
answered Jul 9 at 10:02
Ryan McDonoughRyan McDonough
6154 silver badges8 bronze badges
1
Not sure about this. If Earth blew up and Prince Charles somehow survived then I think it would be odd and redundant to keep referring to him as a prince just because it was a title he used to hold in a previous life.
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 10:10
That doesn't quite equate to the question, that would only count if Prince Charles was ruling Mars then Mars blew up but Earth remained, then that would be the same scenario.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:37
14
There have been several examples among history, where although their respective countries were absorbed by a conquering nation, royalty families maintained their original titles or were granted new ones (usually due to active collaboration with the new regime). So nobility titles can extend themselves further than the existence of the country that creates them.
– Bardo
Jul 9 at 11:48
1
Also note that Prince Philip is only Prince Philip because Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II granted him that title on Feb 22nd, 1957, via Letters Patent. Prior to that, he was not Prince Philip, because to marry Her Majesty he had to renounce his previous Greek and Danish titles. (citation) He is not Prince Philip just because he's a member of a princely family.
– T.J. Crowder
Jul 10 at 10:34
2
Europe is full of princes whose grandfathers lost their kingdoms a hundred years ago. While their titles have been cut or turned into surnames, the public still likes to address them as "Prince X" and "Princess Y", for fame or shame (usually the latter).
– Karl
Jul 11 at 19:16
|
show 2 more comments
It's a title that her people have bestowed on her by "ancient tradition" and persist on calling her, even after the destruction of their homeworld. Note that a significant number of Alderaanians survived the cataclysm and continue to play a role (albeit reduced) in galactic affairs so it's not like the title is necessarily obsolete, even if the planet is gone.
Eventually she discards the appellation in favour of 'General', but some of her people do still refer to her as 'Princess'
She can’t help but smile. “Evaan Verlaine,” she says.
“Hello, Last Princess of Alderaan.”
“I don’t go by that anymore.”
Evaan tilts her head and gives Leia a bemused look. “To me, it’s who you are. You carry the torch for our world. For our home. Don’t ever set it down.”
Aftermath: Life Debt
answered Jul 9 at 20:06
ValorumValorum
433k122 gold badges3192 silver badges3366 bronze badges
add a comment |
Technically, I don't know how large the state or kingdom of Alderaan was. Did the Kingdom of Alderaan only rule the planet Alderaan, or did it rule every planet, moon, comet and asteroid in the Alderaan system, or did it rule the Alderaan system and other nearby systems? If the state of Alderaan included other astronomical bodies, and if there were Alderaan bases or colonies on or orbiting some of those bodies, an unknown percentage of the total Alderaan population might survive.
And if an unknown percentage of the total population of the Kingdom of Alderaan survived on astronomical bodies ruled by Alderaan, what would the governmental status of those astronomical bodies be?
It seems to me that there might be some expectation or hope that if the Empire was defeated Leia might become the Queen of Alderaan, even if the kingdom without the planet Alderaan might not seem as glorious as it once was. And possibly there was a faction of Alderaanians who recognized Leia as the princess and future queen of Alderaan.
So possibly one reason why Leia was called "princess" was the expectation, hope, or desire that the Kingdom of Alderaan be restored once the Galactic Empire was defeated. Another reason to call Leia "princess" might be a belief that exploding Alderaan was illegal and thus the Kingdom of Alderaan still existed legally and Leia was still legally the Princess of Alderaan. It is common in Civil Wars for each faction to claim that everything that the other side does is illegal and thus legally null and void.
answered Jul 9 at 16:15
M. A. GoldingM. A. Golding
16.4k1 gold badge29 silver badges68 bronze badges
add a comment |
Titles generally persist after a person has completed their term in the position. For instance, the moderators in the Democratic debates refer to Biden as "Vice President", even though he is no longer serving in that role. And who's to say that having all Alderaans die ends her position of princess? She is the daughter of the king, therefore she is princess. She doesn't stop being princess just because her father is dead. Although arguably she's Queen Leia now that her parents are dead.
answered Jul 9 at 19:40
AcccumulationAcccumulation
5852 silver badges4 bronze badges
While his wife was the ruling queen of Alderaan, it seems the title "King" was not given to Leia's (adoptive) father. Instead, he served as (galactic) Senator, and had that as his title.
– GreenMatt
Jul 9 at 20:24
2
Political titles persisting seems rather odd to this Brit. They usually don't here. (A retired bishop is still "your Grace" because he has still been ordained a bishop; military and academic titles do persist; aristocratic titles persist until death of course.)
– Martin Bonner
Jul 11 at 13:52
1
@Martin Bonner Yep, and we Americans aren't supposed to have any sort of aristocracy. That was kind of the whole point. I imagine this has a lot to do with reporters 1) needing to contextualize their interviewees and 2) wanting to get access without violating journalistic ethics, by easy flattery.
– Grault
Jul 11 at 15:05
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215735%2fwhy-do-people-keep-referring-to-leia-as-princess-leia-even-after-the-destructio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Whether she is still technically a princess or not is up for debate but I'd argue that it doesn't really matter if she is or not, there are other reasons to call her a princess.
Out of respect
Lor San Tekka explains this point quite clearly in The Force Awakens, it is still respectful to call her a princess even if the place she was a princess is now gone.
Poe: Well, because of you now we have a chance. The General's been after this for a long time.
Lor San Tekka: "The General." To me, she's royalty.
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
That's what they know her by
It would be odd to instantly call someone else and against your nature to instantly call someone else by another name. Heck I still (it's only been a month and a half!) refer to my wife as girlfriend in my head and sometimes use her maiden name. Things take time to get used to and adjust to.
In addition to this point it is easier to refer to someone as their common and most well known name than the new version of it. Tarkin does this in ANH when alerting people about her because it is what they know her by and princess is quicker than Leia Organa. It just makes communication easier initially.
Tarkin: The princess! Put all sections on alert!
Star Wars: A New Hope
In Han's (and sometime Vader's) case to mock
One of the best cases I think is the quote you use in the question, Han uses princess to mock her, note how he often emphasises it when talking. As he grows fonder of her this changes to be more playful but still used in a jokingly kind of way.
Han: Well, Your Highness, I guess this is it.
Leia: That's right.
Han: Don't get all mushy on me. So long, Princess.
Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back
answered Jul 9 at 10:45
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
68.7k29 gold badges449 silver badges493 bronze badges
7
My husband and I have not relinquished former titles: so we'll often refer to hanging out with "a friend" (each other), "my boy/girlfriend","my fiancé/e." So no need to stop calling her a girlfriend -- just confuse people and say you're sneaking out with your girlfriend!
– April
Jul 9 at 19:08
25
"What do you think, princ ... oh, right, I forgot, your entire family was wiped out. Ms. Leia, then" would probably not go over well.
– Acccumulation
Jul 9 at 19:32
1
When did Vader mock her?
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 22:10
Even after the Noghri learn that the name, Mal'ary'ush, or "Daughter of the Savior", stems from a misnomer, they still call her The Lady Vader out of respect (and because that's what they know her by), somewhat to her own chagrin.
– Mazura
Jul 10 at 16:40
add a comment |
Whether she is still technically a princess or not is up for debate but I'd argue that it doesn't really matter if she is or not, there are other reasons to call her a princess.
Out of respect
Lor San Tekka explains this point quite clearly in The Force Awakens, it is still respectful to call her a princess even if the place she was a princess is now gone.
Poe: Well, because of you now we have a chance. The General's been after this for a long time.
Lor San Tekka: "The General." To me, she's royalty.
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
That's what they know her by
It would be odd to instantly call someone else and against your nature to instantly call someone else by another name. Heck I still (it's only been a month and a half!) refer to my wife as girlfriend in my head and sometimes use her maiden name. Things take time to get used to and adjust to.
In addition to this point it is easier to refer to someone as their common and most well known name than the new version of it. Tarkin does this in ANH when alerting people about her because it is what they know her by and princess is quicker than Leia Organa. It just makes communication easier initially.
Tarkin: The princess! Put all sections on alert!
Star Wars: A New Hope
In Han's (and sometime Vader's) case to mock
One of the best cases I think is the quote you use in the question, Han uses princess to mock her, note how he often emphasises it when talking. As he grows fonder of her this changes to be more playful but still used in a jokingly kind of way.
Han: Well, Your Highness, I guess this is it.
Leia: That's right.
Han: Don't get all mushy on me. So long, Princess.
Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back
answered Jul 9 at 10:45
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
68.7k29 gold badges449 silver badges493 bronze badges
7
My husband and I have not relinquished former titles: so we'll often refer to hanging out with "a friend" (each other), "my boy/girlfriend","my fiancé/e." So no need to stop calling her a girlfriend -- just confuse people and say you're sneaking out with your girlfriend!
– April
Jul 9 at 19:08
25
"What do you think, princ ... oh, right, I forgot, your entire family was wiped out. Ms. Leia, then" would probably not go over well.
– Acccumulation
Jul 9 at 19:32
1
When did Vader mock her?
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 22:10
Even after the Noghri learn that the name, Mal'ary'ush, or "Daughter of the Savior", stems from a misnomer, they still call her The Lady Vader out of respect (and because that's what they know her by), somewhat to her own chagrin.
– Mazura
Jul 10 at 16:40
add a comment |
Whether she is still technically a princess or not is up for debate but I'd argue that it doesn't really matter if she is or not, there are other reasons to call her a princess.
Out of respect
Lor San Tekka explains this point quite clearly in The Force Awakens, it is still respectful to call her a princess even if the place she was a princess is now gone.
Poe: Well, because of you now we have a chance. The General's been after this for a long time.
Lor San Tekka: "The General." To me, she's royalty.
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
That's what they know her by
It would be odd to instantly call someone else and against your nature to instantly call someone else by another name. Heck I still (it's only been a month and a half!) refer to my wife as girlfriend in my head and sometimes use her maiden name. Things take time to get used to and adjust to.
In addition to this point it is easier to refer to someone as their common and most well known name than the new version of it. Tarkin does this in ANH when alerting people about her because it is what they know her by and princess is quicker than Leia Organa. It just makes communication easier initially.
Tarkin: The princess! Put all sections on alert!
Star Wars: A New Hope
In Han's (and sometime Vader's) case to mock
One of the best cases I think is the quote you use in the question, Han uses princess to mock her, note how he often emphasises it when talking. As he grows fonder of her this changes to be more playful but still used in a jokingly kind of way.
Han: Well, Your Highness, I guess this is it.
Leia: That's right.
Han: Don't get all mushy on me. So long, Princess.
Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back
answered Jul 9 at 10:45
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
68.7k29 gold badges449 silver badges493 bronze badges
Whether she is still technically a princess or not is up for debate but I'd argue that it doesn't really matter if she is or not, there are other reasons to call her a princess.
Out of respect
Lor San Tekka explains this point quite clearly in The Force Awakens, it is still respectful to call her a princess even if the place she was a princess is now gone.
Poe: Well, because of you now we have a chance. The General's been after this for a long time.
Lor San Tekka: "The General." To me, she's royalty.
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
That's what they know her by
It would be odd to instantly call someone else and against your nature to instantly call someone else by another name. Heck I still (it's only been a month and a half!) refer to my wife as girlfriend in my head and sometimes use her maiden name. Things take time to get used to and adjust to.
In addition to this point it is easier to refer to someone as their common and most well known name than the new version of it. Tarkin does this in ANH when alerting people about her because it is what they know her by and princess is quicker than Leia Organa. It just makes communication easier initially.
Tarkin: The princess! Put all sections on alert!
Star Wars: A New Hope
In Han's (and sometime Vader's) case to mock
One of the best cases I think is the quote you use in the question, Han uses princess to mock her, note how he often emphasises it when talking. As he grows fonder of her this changes to be more playful but still used in a jokingly kind of way.
Han: Well, Your Highness, I guess this is it.
Leia: That's right.
Han: Don't get all mushy on me. So long, Princess.
Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back
answered Jul 9 at 10:45
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
68.7k29 gold badges449 silver badges493 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 10:45
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
68.7k29 gold badges449 silver badges493 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 10:45
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
68.7k29 gold badges449 silver badges493 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 10:45
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
68.7k29 gold badges449 silver badges493 bronze badges
68.7k29 gold badges449 silver badges493 bronze badges
7
My husband and I have not relinquished former titles: so we'll often refer to hanging out with "a friend" (each other), "my boy/girlfriend","my fiancé/e." So no need to stop calling her a girlfriend -- just confuse people and say you're sneaking out with your girlfriend!
– April
Jul 9 at 19:08
25
"What do you think, princ ... oh, right, I forgot, your entire family was wiped out. Ms. Leia, then" would probably not go over well.
– Acccumulation
Jul 9 at 19:32
1
When did Vader mock her?
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 22:10
Even after the Noghri learn that the name, Mal'ary'ush, or "Daughter of the Savior", stems from a misnomer, they still call her The Lady Vader out of respect (and because that's what they know her by), somewhat to her own chagrin.
– Mazura
Jul 10 at 16:40
add a comment |
7
My husband and I have not relinquished former titles: so we'll often refer to hanging out with "a friend" (each other), "my boy/girlfriend","my fiancé/e." So no need to stop calling her a girlfriend -- just confuse people and say you're sneaking out with your girlfriend!
– April
Jul 9 at 19:08
25
"What do you think, princ ... oh, right, I forgot, your entire family was wiped out. Ms. Leia, then" would probably not go over well.
– Acccumulation
Jul 9 at 19:32
1
When did Vader mock her?
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 22:10
Even after the Noghri learn that the name, Mal'ary'ush, or "Daughter of the Savior", stems from a misnomer, they still call her The Lady Vader out of respect (and because that's what they know her by), somewhat to her own chagrin.
– Mazura
Jul 10 at 16:40
7
7
My husband and I have not relinquished former titles: so we'll often refer to hanging out with "a friend" (each other), "my boy/girlfriend","my fiancé/e." So no need to stop calling her a girlfriend -- just confuse people and say you're sneaking out with your girlfriend!
– April
Jul 9 at 19:08
My husband and I have not relinquished former titles: so we'll often refer to hanging out with "a friend" (each other), "my boy/girlfriend","my fiancé/e." So no need to stop calling her a girlfriend -- just confuse people and say you're sneaking out with your girlfriend!
– April
Jul 9 at 19:08
25
25
"What do you think, princ ... oh, right, I forgot, your entire family was wiped out. Ms. Leia, then" would probably not go over well.
– Acccumulation
Jul 9 at 19:32
"What do you think, princ ... oh, right, I forgot, your entire family was wiped out. Ms. Leia, then" would probably not go over well.
– Acccumulation
Jul 9 at 19:32
1
1
When did Vader mock her?
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 22:10
When did Vader mock her?
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 22:10
Even after the Noghri learn that the name, Mal'ary'ush, or "Daughter of the Savior", stems from a misnomer, they still call her The Lady Vader out of respect (and because that's what they know her by), somewhat to her own chagrin.
– Mazura
Jul 10 at 16:40
Even after the Noghri learn that the name, Mal'ary'ush, or "Daughter of the Savior", stems from a misnomer, they still call her The Lady Vader out of respect (and because that's what they know her by), somewhat to her own chagrin.
– Mazura
Jul 10 at 16:40
add a comment |
Leia was adopted as a baby by Senator Organa and Queen Breha Organa, this makes her a princess. You're still a princess regardless of your duties on a day to day basis - you don't actually need to rule anywhere to maintain your status.
A comment on a similar question expands:
A "princess" is a title not limited to daughters of kings and queens.
It just happens to be the title also used for daughters of kings and
queens. Whether her mother was a queen or not when Leia was born
doesn't make a difference. If she comes from a princely family, she is
a princess. And adoption by a queen would also make her a princess.
Prince Charles princely title is indeed the "Prince of Wales" (Wales
is a principality) and the husband of Queen Elizabeth is also a
"prince" despite not being the son of a king or queen.
answered Jul 9 at 10:02
Ryan McDonoughRyan McDonough
6154 silver badges8 bronze badges
1
Not sure about this. If Earth blew up and Prince Charles somehow survived then I think it would be odd and redundant to keep referring to him as a prince just because it was a title he used to hold in a previous life.
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 10:10
That doesn't quite equate to the question, that would only count if Prince Charles was ruling Mars then Mars blew up but Earth remained, then that would be the same scenario.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:37
14
There have been several examples among history, where although their respective countries were absorbed by a conquering nation, royalty families maintained their original titles or were granted new ones (usually due to active collaboration with the new regime). So nobility titles can extend themselves further than the existence of the country that creates them.
– Bardo
Jul 9 at 11:48
1
Also note that Prince Philip is only Prince Philip because Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II granted him that title on Feb 22nd, 1957, via Letters Patent. Prior to that, he was not Prince Philip, because to marry Her Majesty he had to renounce his previous Greek and Danish titles. (citation) He is not Prince Philip just because he's a member of a princely family.
– T.J. Crowder
Jul 10 at 10:34
2
Europe is full of princes whose grandfathers lost their kingdoms a hundred years ago. While their titles have been cut or turned into surnames, the public still likes to address them as "Prince X" and "Princess Y", for fame or shame (usually the latter).
– Karl
Jul 11 at 19:16
|
show 2 more comments
Leia was adopted as a baby by Senator Organa and Queen Breha Organa, this makes her a princess. You're still a princess regardless of your duties on a day to day basis - you don't actually need to rule anywhere to maintain your status.
A comment on a similar question expands:
A "princess" is a title not limited to daughters of kings and queens.
It just happens to be the title also used for daughters of kings and
queens. Whether her mother was a queen or not when Leia was born
doesn't make a difference. If she comes from a princely family, she is
a princess. And adoption by a queen would also make her a princess.
Prince Charles princely title is indeed the "Prince of Wales" (Wales
is a principality) and the husband of Queen Elizabeth is also a
"prince" despite not being the son of a king or queen.
answered Jul 9 at 10:02
Ryan McDonoughRyan McDonough
6154 silver badges8 bronze badges
1
Not sure about this. If Earth blew up and Prince Charles somehow survived then I think it would be odd and redundant to keep referring to him as a prince just because it was a title he used to hold in a previous life.
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 10:10
That doesn't quite equate to the question, that would only count if Prince Charles was ruling Mars then Mars blew up but Earth remained, then that would be the same scenario.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:37
14
There have been several examples among history, where although their respective countries were absorbed by a conquering nation, royalty families maintained their original titles or were granted new ones (usually due to active collaboration with the new regime). So nobility titles can extend themselves further than the existence of the country that creates them.
– Bardo
Jul 9 at 11:48
1
Also note that Prince Philip is only Prince Philip because Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II granted him that title on Feb 22nd, 1957, via Letters Patent. Prior to that, he was not Prince Philip, because to marry Her Majesty he had to renounce his previous Greek and Danish titles. (citation) He is not Prince Philip just because he's a member of a princely family.
– T.J. Crowder
Jul 10 at 10:34
2
Europe is full of princes whose grandfathers lost their kingdoms a hundred years ago. While their titles have been cut or turned into surnames, the public still likes to address them as "Prince X" and "Princess Y", for fame or shame (usually the latter).
– Karl
Jul 11 at 19:16
|
show 2 more comments
Leia was adopted as a baby by Senator Organa and Queen Breha Organa, this makes her a princess. You're still a princess regardless of your duties on a day to day basis - you don't actually need to rule anywhere to maintain your status.
A comment on a similar question expands:
A "princess" is a title not limited to daughters of kings and queens.
It just happens to be the title also used for daughters of kings and
queens. Whether her mother was a queen or not when Leia was born
doesn't make a difference. If she comes from a princely family, she is
a princess. And adoption by a queen would also make her a princess.
Prince Charles princely title is indeed the "Prince of Wales" (Wales
is a principality) and the husband of Queen Elizabeth is also a
"prince" despite not being the son of a king or queen.
answered Jul 9 at 10:02
Ryan McDonoughRyan McDonough
6154 silver badges8 bronze badges
Leia was adopted as a baby by Senator Organa and Queen Breha Organa, this makes her a princess. You're still a princess regardless of your duties on a day to day basis - you don't actually need to rule anywhere to maintain your status.
A comment on a similar question expands:
A "princess" is a title not limited to daughters of kings and queens.
It just happens to be the title also used for daughters of kings and
queens. Whether her mother was a queen or not when Leia was born
doesn't make a difference. If she comes from a princely family, she is
a princess. And adoption by a queen would also make her a princess.
Prince Charles princely title is indeed the "Prince of Wales" (Wales
is a principality) and the husband of Queen Elizabeth is also a
"prince" despite not being the son of a king or queen.
answered Jul 9 at 10:02
Ryan McDonoughRyan McDonough
6154 silver badges8 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 10:02
Ryan McDonoughRyan McDonough
6154 silver badges8 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 10:02
Ryan McDonoughRyan McDonough
6154 silver badges8 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 10:02
Ryan McDonoughRyan McDonough
6154 silver badges8 bronze badges
6154 silver badges8 bronze badges
1
Not sure about this. If Earth blew up and Prince Charles somehow survived then I think it would be odd and redundant to keep referring to him as a prince just because it was a title he used to hold in a previous life.
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 10:10
That doesn't quite equate to the question, that would only count if Prince Charles was ruling Mars then Mars blew up but Earth remained, then that would be the same scenario.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:37
14
There have been several examples among history, where although their respective countries were absorbed by a conquering nation, royalty families maintained their original titles or were granted new ones (usually due to active collaboration with the new regime). So nobility titles can extend themselves further than the existence of the country that creates them.
– Bardo
Jul 9 at 11:48
1
Also note that Prince Philip is only Prince Philip because Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II granted him that title on Feb 22nd, 1957, via Letters Patent. Prior to that, he was not Prince Philip, because to marry Her Majesty he had to renounce his previous Greek and Danish titles. (citation) He is not Prince Philip just because he's a member of a princely family.
– T.J. Crowder
Jul 10 at 10:34
2
Europe is full of princes whose grandfathers lost their kingdoms a hundred years ago. While their titles have been cut or turned into surnames, the public still likes to address them as "Prince X" and "Princess Y", for fame or shame (usually the latter).
– Karl
Jul 11 at 19:16
|
show 2 more comments
1
Not sure about this. If Earth blew up and Prince Charles somehow survived then I think it would be odd and redundant to keep referring to him as a prince just because it was a title he used to hold in a previous life.
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 10:10
That doesn't quite equate to the question, that would only count if Prince Charles was ruling Mars then Mars blew up but Earth remained, then that would be the same scenario.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:37
14
There have been several examples among history, where although their respective countries were absorbed by a conquering nation, royalty families maintained their original titles or were granted new ones (usually due to active collaboration with the new regime). So nobility titles can extend themselves further than the existence of the country that creates them.
– Bardo
Jul 9 at 11:48
1
Also note that Prince Philip is only Prince Philip because Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II granted him that title on Feb 22nd, 1957, via Letters Patent. Prior to that, he was not Prince Philip, because to marry Her Majesty he had to renounce his previous Greek and Danish titles. (citation) He is not Prince Philip just because he's a member of a princely family.
– T.J. Crowder
Jul 10 at 10:34
2
Europe is full of princes whose grandfathers lost their kingdoms a hundred years ago. While their titles have been cut or turned into surnames, the public still likes to address them as "Prince X" and "Princess Y", for fame or shame (usually the latter).
– Karl
Jul 11 at 19:16
1
1
Not sure about this. If Earth blew up and Prince Charles somehow survived then I think it would be odd and redundant to keep referring to him as a prince just because it was a title he used to hold in a previous life.
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 10:10
Not sure about this. If Earth blew up and Prince Charles somehow survived then I think it would be odd and redundant to keep referring to him as a prince just because it was a title he used to hold in a previous life.
– The Dark Lord
Jul 9 at 10:10
That doesn't quite equate to the question, that would only count if Prince Charles was ruling Mars then Mars blew up but Earth remained, then that would be the same scenario.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:37
That doesn't quite equate to the question, that would only count if Prince Charles was ruling Mars then Mars blew up but Earth remained, then that would be the same scenario.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:37
14
14
There have been several examples among history, where although their respective countries were absorbed by a conquering nation, royalty families maintained their original titles or were granted new ones (usually due to active collaboration with the new regime). So nobility titles can extend themselves further than the existence of the country that creates them.
– Bardo
Jul 9 at 11:48
There have been several examples among history, where although their respective countries were absorbed by a conquering nation, royalty families maintained their original titles or were granted new ones (usually due to active collaboration with the new regime). So nobility titles can extend themselves further than the existence of the country that creates them.
– Bardo
Jul 9 at 11:48
1
1
Also note that Prince Philip is only Prince Philip because Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II granted him that title on Feb 22nd, 1957, via Letters Patent. Prior to that, he was not Prince Philip, because to marry Her Majesty he had to renounce his previous Greek and Danish titles. (citation) He is not Prince Philip just because he's a member of a princely family.
– T.J. Crowder
Jul 10 at 10:34
Also note that Prince Philip is only Prince Philip because Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II granted him that title on Feb 22nd, 1957, via Letters Patent. Prior to that, he was not Prince Philip, because to marry Her Majesty he had to renounce his previous Greek and Danish titles. (citation) He is not Prince Philip just because he's a member of a princely family.
– T.J. Crowder
Jul 10 at 10:34
2
2
Europe is full of princes whose grandfathers lost their kingdoms a hundred years ago. While their titles have been cut or turned into surnames, the public still likes to address them as "Prince X" and "Princess Y", for fame or shame (usually the latter).
– Karl
Jul 11 at 19:16
Europe is full of princes whose grandfathers lost their kingdoms a hundred years ago. While their titles have been cut or turned into surnames, the public still likes to address them as "Prince X" and "Princess Y", for fame or shame (usually the latter).
– Karl
Jul 11 at 19:16
|
show 2 more comments
It's a title that her people have bestowed on her by "ancient tradition" and persist on calling her, even after the destruction of their homeworld. Note that a significant number of Alderaanians survived the cataclysm and continue to play a role (albeit reduced) in galactic affairs so it's not like the title is necessarily obsolete, even if the planet is gone.
Eventually she discards the appellation in favour of 'General', but some of her people do still refer to her as 'Princess'
She can’t help but smile. “Evaan Verlaine,” she says.
“Hello, Last Princess of Alderaan.”
“I don’t go by that anymore.”
Evaan tilts her head and gives Leia a bemused look. “To me, it’s who you are. You carry the torch for our world. For our home. Don’t ever set it down.”
Aftermath: Life Debt
answered Jul 9 at 20:06
ValorumValorum
433k122 gold badges3192 silver badges3366 bronze badges
add a comment |
It's a title that her people have bestowed on her by "ancient tradition" and persist on calling her, even after the destruction of their homeworld. Note that a significant number of Alderaanians survived the cataclysm and continue to play a role (albeit reduced) in galactic affairs so it's not like the title is necessarily obsolete, even if the planet is gone.
Eventually she discards the appellation in favour of 'General', but some of her people do still refer to her as 'Princess'
She can’t help but smile. “Evaan Verlaine,” she says.
“Hello, Last Princess of Alderaan.”
“I don’t go by that anymore.”
Evaan tilts her head and gives Leia a bemused look. “To me, it’s who you are. You carry the torch for our world. For our home. Don’t ever set it down.”
Aftermath: Life Debt
answered Jul 9 at 20:06
ValorumValorum
433k122 gold badges3192 silver badges3366 bronze badges
add a comment |
It's a title that her people have bestowed on her by "ancient tradition" and persist on calling her, even after the destruction of their homeworld. Note that a significant number of Alderaanians survived the cataclysm and continue to play a role (albeit reduced) in galactic affairs so it's not like the title is necessarily obsolete, even if the planet is gone.
Eventually she discards the appellation in favour of 'General', but some of her people do still refer to her as 'Princess'
She can’t help but smile. “Evaan Verlaine,” she says.
“Hello, Last Princess of Alderaan.”
“I don’t go by that anymore.”
Evaan tilts her head and gives Leia a bemused look. “To me, it’s who you are. You carry the torch for our world. For our home. Don’t ever set it down.”
Aftermath: Life Debt
answered Jul 9 at 20:06
ValorumValorum
433k122 gold badges3192 silver badges3366 bronze badges
It's a title that her people have bestowed on her by "ancient tradition" and persist on calling her, even after the destruction of their homeworld. Note that a significant number of Alderaanians survived the cataclysm and continue to play a role (albeit reduced) in galactic affairs so it's not like the title is necessarily obsolete, even if the planet is gone.
Eventually she discards the appellation in favour of 'General', but some of her people do still refer to her as 'Princess'
She can’t help but smile. “Evaan Verlaine,” she says.
“Hello, Last Princess of Alderaan.”
“I don’t go by that anymore.”
Evaan tilts her head and gives Leia a bemused look. “To me, it’s who you are. You carry the torch for our world. For our home. Don’t ever set it down.”
Aftermath: Life Debt
answered Jul 9 at 20:06
ValorumValorum
433k122 gold badges3192 silver badges3366 bronze badges
edited Jul 9 at 20:21
answered Jul 9 at 20:06
ValorumValorum
433k122 gold badges3192 silver badges3366 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 20:06
ValorumValorum
433k122 gold badges3192 silver badges3366 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 20:06
ValorumValorum
433k122 gold badges3192 silver badges3366 bronze badges
433k122 gold badges3192 silver badges3366 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Technically, I don't know how large the state or kingdom of Alderaan was. Did the Kingdom of Alderaan only rule the planet Alderaan, or did it rule every planet, moon, comet and asteroid in the Alderaan system, or did it rule the Alderaan system and other nearby systems? If the state of Alderaan included other astronomical bodies, and if there were Alderaan bases or colonies on or orbiting some of those bodies, an unknown percentage of the total Alderaan population might survive.
And if an unknown percentage of the total population of the Kingdom of Alderaan survived on astronomical bodies ruled by Alderaan, what would the governmental status of those astronomical bodies be?
It seems to me that there might be some expectation or hope that if the Empire was defeated Leia might become the Queen of Alderaan, even if the kingdom without the planet Alderaan might not seem as glorious as it once was. And possibly there was a faction of Alderaanians who recognized Leia as the princess and future queen of Alderaan.
So possibly one reason why Leia was called "princess" was the expectation, hope, or desire that the Kingdom of Alderaan be restored once the Galactic Empire was defeated. Another reason to call Leia "princess" might be a belief that exploding Alderaan was illegal and thus the Kingdom of Alderaan still existed legally and Leia was still legally the Princess of Alderaan. It is common in Civil Wars for each faction to claim that everything that the other side does is illegal and thus legally null and void.
answered Jul 9 at 16:15
M. A. GoldingM. A. Golding
16.4k1 gold badge29 silver badges68 bronze badges
add a comment |
Technically, I don't know how large the state or kingdom of Alderaan was. Did the Kingdom of Alderaan only rule the planet Alderaan, or did it rule every planet, moon, comet and asteroid in the Alderaan system, or did it rule the Alderaan system and other nearby systems? If the state of Alderaan included other astronomical bodies, and if there were Alderaan bases or colonies on or orbiting some of those bodies, an unknown percentage of the total Alderaan population might survive.
And if an unknown percentage of the total population of the Kingdom of Alderaan survived on astronomical bodies ruled by Alderaan, what would the governmental status of those astronomical bodies be?
It seems to me that there might be some expectation or hope that if the Empire was defeated Leia might become the Queen of Alderaan, even if the kingdom without the planet Alderaan might not seem as glorious as it once was. And possibly there was a faction of Alderaanians who recognized Leia as the princess and future queen of Alderaan.
So possibly one reason why Leia was called "princess" was the expectation, hope, or desire that the Kingdom of Alderaan be restored once the Galactic Empire was defeated. Another reason to call Leia "princess" might be a belief that exploding Alderaan was illegal and thus the Kingdom of Alderaan still existed legally and Leia was still legally the Princess of Alderaan. It is common in Civil Wars for each faction to claim that everything that the other side does is illegal and thus legally null and void.
answered Jul 9 at 16:15
M. A. GoldingM. A. Golding
16.4k1 gold badge29 silver badges68 bronze badges
add a comment |
Technically, I don't know how large the state or kingdom of Alderaan was. Did the Kingdom of Alderaan only rule the planet Alderaan, or did it rule every planet, moon, comet and asteroid in the Alderaan system, or did it rule the Alderaan system and other nearby systems? If the state of Alderaan included other astronomical bodies, and if there were Alderaan bases or colonies on or orbiting some of those bodies, an unknown percentage of the total Alderaan population might survive.
And if an unknown percentage of the total population of the Kingdom of Alderaan survived on astronomical bodies ruled by Alderaan, what would the governmental status of those astronomical bodies be?
It seems to me that there might be some expectation or hope that if the Empire was defeated Leia might become the Queen of Alderaan, even if the kingdom without the planet Alderaan might not seem as glorious as it once was. And possibly there was a faction of Alderaanians who recognized Leia as the princess and future queen of Alderaan.
So possibly one reason why Leia was called "princess" was the expectation, hope, or desire that the Kingdom of Alderaan be restored once the Galactic Empire was defeated. Another reason to call Leia "princess" might be a belief that exploding Alderaan was illegal and thus the Kingdom of Alderaan still existed legally and Leia was still legally the Princess of Alderaan. It is common in Civil Wars for each faction to claim that everything that the other side does is illegal and thus legally null and void.
answered Jul 9 at 16:15
M. A. GoldingM. A. Golding
16.4k1 gold badge29 silver badges68 bronze badges
Technically, I don't know how large the state or kingdom of Alderaan was. Did the Kingdom of Alderaan only rule the planet Alderaan, or did it rule every planet, moon, comet and asteroid in the Alderaan system, or did it rule the Alderaan system and other nearby systems? If the state of Alderaan included other astronomical bodies, and if there were Alderaan bases or colonies on or orbiting some of those bodies, an unknown percentage of the total Alderaan population might survive.
And if an unknown percentage of the total population of the Kingdom of Alderaan survived on astronomical bodies ruled by Alderaan, what would the governmental status of those astronomical bodies be?
It seems to me that there might be some expectation or hope that if the Empire was defeated Leia might become the Queen of Alderaan, even if the kingdom without the planet Alderaan might not seem as glorious as it once was. And possibly there was a faction of Alderaanians who recognized Leia as the princess and future queen of Alderaan.
So possibly one reason why Leia was called "princess" was the expectation, hope, or desire that the Kingdom of Alderaan be restored once the Galactic Empire was defeated. Another reason to call Leia "princess" might be a belief that exploding Alderaan was illegal and thus the Kingdom of Alderaan still existed legally and Leia was still legally the Princess of Alderaan. It is common in Civil Wars for each faction to claim that everything that the other side does is illegal and thus legally null and void.
answered Jul 9 at 16:15
M. A. GoldingM. A. Golding
16.4k1 gold badge29 silver badges68 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 16:15
M. A. GoldingM. A. Golding
16.4k1 gold badge29 silver badges68 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 16:15
M. A. GoldingM. A. Golding
16.4k1 gold badge29 silver badges68 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 16:15
M. A. GoldingM. A. Golding
16.4k1 gold badge29 silver badges68 bronze badges
16.4k1 gold badge29 silver badges68 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Titles generally persist after a person has completed their term in the position. For instance, the moderators in the Democratic debates refer to Biden as "Vice President", even though he is no longer serving in that role. And who's to say that having all Alderaans die ends her position of princess? She is the daughter of the king, therefore she is princess. She doesn't stop being princess just because her father is dead. Although arguably she's Queen Leia now that her parents are dead.
answered Jul 9 at 19:40
AcccumulationAcccumulation
5852 silver badges4 bronze badges
While his wife was the ruling queen of Alderaan, it seems the title "King" was not given to Leia's (adoptive) father. Instead, he served as (galactic) Senator, and had that as his title.
– GreenMatt
Jul 9 at 20:24
2
Political titles persisting seems rather odd to this Brit. They usually don't here. (A retired bishop is still "your Grace" because he has still been ordained a bishop; military and academic titles do persist; aristocratic titles persist until death of course.)
– Martin Bonner
Jul 11 at 13:52
1
@Martin Bonner Yep, and we Americans aren't supposed to have any sort of aristocracy. That was kind of the whole point. I imagine this has a lot to do with reporters 1) needing to contextualize their interviewees and 2) wanting to get access without violating journalistic ethics, by easy flattery.
– Grault
Jul 11 at 15:05
add a comment |
Titles generally persist after a person has completed their term in the position. For instance, the moderators in the Democratic debates refer to Biden as "Vice President", even though he is no longer serving in that role. And who's to say that having all Alderaans die ends her position of princess? She is the daughter of the king, therefore she is princess. She doesn't stop being princess just because her father is dead. Although arguably she's Queen Leia now that her parents are dead.
answered Jul 9 at 19:40
AcccumulationAcccumulation
5852 silver badges4 bronze badges
While his wife was the ruling queen of Alderaan, it seems the title "King" was not given to Leia's (adoptive) father. Instead, he served as (galactic) Senator, and had that as his title.
– GreenMatt
Jul 9 at 20:24
2
Political titles persisting seems rather odd to this Brit. They usually don't here. (A retired bishop is still "your Grace" because he has still been ordained a bishop; military and academic titles do persist; aristocratic titles persist until death of course.)
– Martin Bonner
Jul 11 at 13:52
1
@Martin Bonner Yep, and we Americans aren't supposed to have any sort of aristocracy. That was kind of the whole point. I imagine this has a lot to do with reporters 1) needing to contextualize their interviewees and 2) wanting to get access without violating journalistic ethics, by easy flattery.
– Grault
Jul 11 at 15:05
add a comment |
Titles generally persist after a person has completed their term in the position. For instance, the moderators in the Democratic debates refer to Biden as "Vice President", even though he is no longer serving in that role. And who's to say that having all Alderaans die ends her position of princess? She is the daughter of the king, therefore she is princess. She doesn't stop being princess just because her father is dead. Although arguably she's Queen Leia now that her parents are dead.
answered Jul 9 at 19:40
AcccumulationAcccumulation
5852 silver badges4 bronze badges
Titles generally persist after a person has completed their term in the position. For instance, the moderators in the Democratic debates refer to Biden as "Vice President", even though he is no longer serving in that role. And who's to say that having all Alderaans die ends her position of princess? She is the daughter of the king, therefore she is princess. She doesn't stop being princess just because her father is dead. Although arguably she's Queen Leia now that her parents are dead.
answered Jul 9 at 19:40
AcccumulationAcccumulation
5852 silver badges4 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 19:40
AcccumulationAcccumulation
5852 silver badges4 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 19:40
AcccumulationAcccumulation
5852 silver badges4 bronze badges
answered Jul 9 at 19:40
AcccumulationAcccumulation
5852 silver badges4 bronze badges
5852 silver badges4 bronze badges
While his wife was the ruling queen of Alderaan, it seems the title "King" was not given to Leia's (adoptive) father. Instead, he served as (galactic) Senator, and had that as his title.
– GreenMatt
Jul 9 at 20:24
2
Political titles persisting seems rather odd to this Brit. They usually don't here. (A retired bishop is still "your Grace" because he has still been ordained a bishop; military and academic titles do persist; aristocratic titles persist until death of course.)
– Martin Bonner
Jul 11 at 13:52
1
@Martin Bonner Yep, and we Americans aren't supposed to have any sort of aristocracy. That was kind of the whole point. I imagine this has a lot to do with reporters 1) needing to contextualize their interviewees and 2) wanting to get access without violating journalistic ethics, by easy flattery.
– Grault
Jul 11 at 15:05
add a comment |
While his wife was the ruling queen of Alderaan, it seems the title "King" was not given to Leia's (adoptive) father. Instead, he served as (galactic) Senator, and had that as his title.
– GreenMatt
Jul 9 at 20:24
2
Political titles persisting seems rather odd to this Brit. They usually don't here. (A retired bishop is still "your Grace" because he has still been ordained a bishop; military and academic titles do persist; aristocratic titles persist until death of course.)
– Martin Bonner
Jul 11 at 13:52
1
@Martin Bonner Yep, and we Americans aren't supposed to have any sort of aristocracy. That was kind of the whole point. I imagine this has a lot to do with reporters 1) needing to contextualize their interviewees and 2) wanting to get access without violating journalistic ethics, by easy flattery.
– Grault
Jul 11 at 15:05
While his wife was the ruling queen of Alderaan, it seems the title "King" was not given to Leia's (adoptive) father. Instead, he served as (galactic) Senator, and had that as his title.
– GreenMatt
Jul 9 at 20:24
While his wife was the ruling queen of Alderaan, it seems the title "King" was not given to Leia's (adoptive) father. Instead, he served as (galactic) Senator, and had that as his title.
– GreenMatt
Jul 9 at 20:24
2
2
Political titles persisting seems rather odd to this Brit. They usually don't here. (A retired bishop is still "your Grace" because he has still been ordained a bishop; military and academic titles do persist; aristocratic titles persist until death of course.)
– Martin Bonner
Jul 11 at 13:52
Political titles persisting seems rather odd to this Brit. They usually don't here. (A retired bishop is still "your Grace" because he has still been ordained a bishop; military and academic titles do persist; aristocratic titles persist until death of course.)
– Martin Bonner
Jul 11 at 13:52
1
1
@Martin Bonner Yep, and we Americans aren't supposed to have any sort of aristocracy. That was kind of the whole point. I imagine this has a lot to do with reporters 1) needing to contextualize their interviewees and 2) wanting to get access without violating journalistic ethics, by easy flattery.
– Grault
Jul 11 at 15:05
@Martin Bonner Yep, and we Americans aren't supposed to have any sort of aristocracy. That was kind of the whole point. I imagine this has a lot to do with reporters 1) needing to contextualize their interviewees and 2) wanting to get access without violating journalistic ethics, by easy flattery.
– Grault
Jul 11 at 15:05
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215735%2fwhy-do-people-keep-referring-to-leia-as-princess-leia-even-after-the-destructio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
24
You're still a princess if a daughter of a king or queen regardless of your actual day to day duties.
– Ryan McDonough
Jul 9 at 10:00
41
That sort of thing happens in our galaxy too. The widow Jones may still be called Mrs. Jones even though Mr. Jones is dead. Contemporary Romanoffs use titles such as Duke and Duchess, Prince and Princess, although there is no longer a Russian Monarchy for them to rule. On the TV news you often hear ex-governors and ex-senators addressed as "Governor" and "Senator". Go figure.
– user14111
Jul 9 at 11:00
28
Alderaan isn't a place. It never was. It's where Leia's people stand! As long as they're alive, then... er... oh, right, they're all dead too.
– Paul D. Waite
Jul 9 at 16:40
6
@PaulD.Waite Surely there must have been some other Alderaanians offworld at the time it was destroyed.
– JAB
Jul 10 at 2:24
5
Because Lucas was playing the long game and that was the only way for Leia to become a Disney princess.
– reirab
Jul 11 at 1:32