What does the “ep” capability mean?Unable to set capability CAP_SETFCAP by userWhat does this iptable rule mean?Granting service specific capabilitiesWhat does :source % mean?Does every syscall require at most 1 capability on Linux?Better use ACL or Capability to let users start a service?Does a process that have the root user always have all of the capabilities available in Linux?Does macOS and Solaris have “capabilities”?Difference between file capability and process capabilityWhat does the '.' (dot) mean?
Do I have to make someone coauthor if he/she solves a problem in StackExchange, asked by myself, which is later used in my paper?
What are the differences between credential stuffing and password spraying?
Comment rendre "naysayers" ?
What happens to matryoshka Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansions?
How to 'Let Go' in Meditation?
Missed the connecting flight, separate tickets on same airline - who is responsible?
I caught several of my students plagiarizing. Could it be my fault as a teacher?
What are the spoon bit of a spoon and fork bit of a fork called?
How to reply this mail from potential PhD professor?
Why is C# in the D Major Scale?
Answer "Justification for travel support" in conference registration form
Short story with physics professor who "brings back the dead" (Asimov or Bradbury?)
What is a "listed natural gas appliance"?
Are we obligated to aspire to be Talmidei Chachamim?
What was the state of the German rail system in 1944?
Sub query result is 0
Type-check an expression
My ID is expired, can I fly to the Bahamas with my passport?
Besides the up and down quark, what other quarks are present in daily matter around us?
Is it cheaper to drop cargo than to land it?
If Earth is tilted, why is Polaris always above the same spot?
Accidentally deleted the "/usr/share" folder
Would a 1/1 token with persist dying trigger on death effects a second time?
Upside-Down Pyramid Addition...REVERSED!
What does the “ep” capability mean?
Unable to set capability CAP_SETFCAP by userWhat does this iptable rule mean?Granting service specific capabilitiesWhat does :source % mean?Does every syscall require at most 1 capability on Linux?Better use ACL or Capability to let users start a service?Does a process that have the root user always have all of the capabilities available in Linux?Does macOS and Solaris have “capabilities”?Difference between file capability and process capabilityWhat does the '.' (dot) mean?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
root@macine:~# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
What does "ep" mean? What are the capabilities of this binary?
linux capabilities
edited Apr 27 at 18:44
muru
38.2k591166
asked Apr 27 at 16:16
JamesJames
263
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
root@macine:~# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
What does "ep" mean? What are the capabilities of this binary?
linux capabilities
edited Apr 27 at 18:44
muru
38.2k591166
asked Apr 27 at 16:16
JamesJames
263
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
4
capabilities(7)have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.
– mosvy
Apr 27 at 16:36
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 16:43
@Jesse_b that's wrong, there's no "special case" of empty capabilities. That guy was simply confused by the syntax.setcap =ep filewill turn all capabilities on,setcap = filewill turn them all off (make them empty) andsetcap -r filewill remove them completely.
– mosvy
Apr 27 at 20:41
@mosvy: Dew hwat?
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 20:58
add a comment |
root@macine:~# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
What does "ep" mean? What are the capabilities of this binary?
linux capabilities
edited Apr 27 at 18:44
muru
38.2k591166
asked Apr 27 at 16:16
JamesJames
263
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
root@macine:~# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
What does "ep" mean? What are the capabilities of this binary?
linux capabilities
linux capabilities
edited Apr 27 at 18:44
muru
38.2k591166
asked Apr 27 at 16:16
JamesJames
263
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Apr 27 at 18:44
muru
38.2k591166
asked Apr 27 at 16:16
JamesJames
263
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Apr 27 at 18:44
muru
38.2k591166
edited Apr 27 at 18:44
muru
38.2k591166
edited Apr 27 at 18:44
muru
38.2k591166
38.2k591166
asked Apr 27 at 16:16
JamesJames
263
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Apr 27 at 16:16
JamesJames
263
asked Apr 27 at 16:16
JamesJames
263
263
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
4
capabilities(7)have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.
– mosvy
Apr 27 at 16:36
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 16:43
@Jesse_b that's wrong, there's no "special case" of empty capabilities. That guy was simply confused by the syntax.setcap =ep filewill turn all capabilities on,setcap = filewill turn them all off (make them empty) andsetcap -r filewill remove them completely.
– mosvy
Apr 27 at 20:41
@mosvy: Dew hwat?
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 20:58
add a comment |
4
capabilities(7)have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.
– mosvy
Apr 27 at 16:36
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 16:43
@Jesse_b that's wrong, there's no "special case" of empty capabilities. That guy was simply confused by the syntax.setcap =ep filewill turn all capabilities on,setcap = filewill turn them all off (make them empty) andsetcap -r filewill remove them completely.
– mosvy
Apr 27 at 20:41
@mosvy: Dew hwat?
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 20:58
4
4
capabilities(7) have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.– mosvy
Apr 27 at 16:36
capabilities(7) have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.– mosvy
Apr 27 at 16:36
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 16:43
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 16:43
@Jesse_b that's wrong, there's no "special case" of empty capabilities. That guy was simply confused by the syntax.
setcap =ep file will turn all capabilities on, setcap = file will turn them all off (make them empty) and setcap -r file will remove them completely.– mosvy
Apr 27 at 20:41
@Jesse_b that's wrong, there's no "special case" of empty capabilities. That guy was simply confused by the syntax.
setcap =ep file will turn all capabilities on, setcap = file will turn them all off (make them empty) and setcap -r file will remove them completely.– mosvy
Apr 27 at 20:41
@mosvy: Dew hwat?
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 20:58
@mosvy: Dew hwat?
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 20:58
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
That binary has ALL the capabilites permitted (p) and effective (e) from the start.
In the textual representation of capabilities, a leading = is equivalent to all=.
From the cap_to_text(3) manpage:
In the case that the leading operator is
=, and no list of capabilities is provided, the action-list is assumed to refer to all capabilities. For example, the following three clauses are equivalent to each
other (and indicate a completely empty capability set):all=;=;
cap_chown,<every-other-capability>=.
Such a binary can do whatever it pleases, limited only by the capability bounding set, which on a typical desktop system includes everything (otherwise setuid binaries like su wouldn't work as expected).
Notice that this is only a "gotcha" of the textual representation used by libpcap: in the security.capability extended attribute of the file for which getcap will print /file/path =ep, all the meaningful bits are effectively on; for an empty security.capability, /file/path = (with the = not followed by anything) will be printed instead.
If someone is still not convinced about all that, here is a small experiment:
# cp /bin/ping /tmp/ping # will wipe setuid bits and extented attributes
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
# setcap =ep /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost' # will work because of cap_net_raw
PING localhost(localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.073 ms
^C
# setcap = /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
answered Apr 27 at 17:09
mosvymosvy
11k11340
add a comment |
The capabilities are put in the permitted set (p), and all permitted capabilities are copied into the effective set (e). There does not seem to be any capabilities in your example (where did you get it from?).
The e is used for legacy programs (possibly most programs at the current time), that is programs that don't know about capabilities, so can not them-selves copy capabilities from permitted to effective.
answered Apr 27 at 16:48
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f515881%2fwhat-does-the-ep-capability-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
That binary has ALL the capabilites permitted (p) and effective (e) from the start.
In the textual representation of capabilities, a leading = is equivalent to all=.
From the cap_to_text(3) manpage:
In the case that the leading operator is
=, and no list of capabilities is provided, the action-list is assumed to refer to all capabilities. For example, the following three clauses are equivalent to each
other (and indicate a completely empty capability set):all=;=;
cap_chown,<every-other-capability>=.
Such a binary can do whatever it pleases, limited only by the capability bounding set, which on a typical desktop system includes everything (otherwise setuid binaries like su wouldn't work as expected).
Notice that this is only a "gotcha" of the textual representation used by libpcap: in the security.capability extended attribute of the file for which getcap will print /file/path =ep, all the meaningful bits are effectively on; for an empty security.capability, /file/path = (with the = not followed by anything) will be printed instead.
If someone is still not convinced about all that, here is a small experiment:
# cp /bin/ping /tmp/ping # will wipe setuid bits and extented attributes
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
# setcap =ep /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost' # will work because of cap_net_raw
PING localhost(localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.073 ms
^C
# setcap = /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
answered Apr 27 at 17:09
mosvymosvy
11k11340
add a comment |
# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
That binary has ALL the capabilites permitted (p) and effective (e) from the start.
In the textual representation of capabilities, a leading = is equivalent to all=.
From the cap_to_text(3) manpage:
In the case that the leading operator is
=, and no list of capabilities is provided, the action-list is assumed to refer to all capabilities. For example, the following three clauses are equivalent to each
other (and indicate a completely empty capability set):all=;=;
cap_chown,<every-other-capability>=.
Such a binary can do whatever it pleases, limited only by the capability bounding set, which on a typical desktop system includes everything (otherwise setuid binaries like su wouldn't work as expected).
Notice that this is only a "gotcha" of the textual representation used by libpcap: in the security.capability extended attribute of the file for which getcap will print /file/path =ep, all the meaningful bits are effectively on; for an empty security.capability, /file/path = (with the = not followed by anything) will be printed instead.
If someone is still not convinced about all that, here is a small experiment:
# cp /bin/ping /tmp/ping # will wipe setuid bits and extented attributes
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
# setcap =ep /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost' # will work because of cap_net_raw
PING localhost(localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.073 ms
^C
# setcap = /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
answered Apr 27 at 17:09
mosvymosvy
11k11340
add a comment |
# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
That binary has ALL the capabilites permitted (p) and effective (e) from the start.
In the textual representation of capabilities, a leading = is equivalent to all=.
From the cap_to_text(3) manpage:
In the case that the leading operator is
=, and no list of capabilities is provided, the action-list is assumed to refer to all capabilities. For example, the following three clauses are equivalent to each
other (and indicate a completely empty capability set):all=;=;
cap_chown,<every-other-capability>=.
Such a binary can do whatever it pleases, limited only by the capability bounding set, which on a typical desktop system includes everything (otherwise setuid binaries like su wouldn't work as expected).
Notice that this is only a "gotcha" of the textual representation used by libpcap: in the security.capability extended attribute of the file for which getcap will print /file/path =ep, all the meaningful bits are effectively on; for an empty security.capability, /file/path = (with the = not followed by anything) will be printed instead.
If someone is still not convinced about all that, here is a small experiment:
# cp /bin/ping /tmp/ping # will wipe setuid bits and extented attributes
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
# setcap =ep /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost' # will work because of cap_net_raw
PING localhost(localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.073 ms
^C
# setcap = /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
answered Apr 27 at 17:09
mosvymosvy
11k11340
# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
That binary has ALL the capabilites permitted (p) and effective (e) from the start.
In the textual representation of capabilities, a leading = is equivalent to all=.
From the cap_to_text(3) manpage:
In the case that the leading operator is
=, and no list of capabilities is provided, the action-list is assumed to refer to all capabilities. For example, the following three clauses are equivalent to each
other (and indicate a completely empty capability set):all=;=;
cap_chown,<every-other-capability>=.
Such a binary can do whatever it pleases, limited only by the capability bounding set, which on a typical desktop system includes everything (otherwise setuid binaries like su wouldn't work as expected).
Notice that this is only a "gotcha" of the textual representation used by libpcap: in the security.capability extended attribute of the file for which getcap will print /file/path =ep, all the meaningful bits are effectively on; for an empty security.capability, /file/path = (with the = not followed by anything) will be printed instead.
If someone is still not convinced about all that, here is a small experiment:
# cp /bin/ping /tmp/ping # will wipe setuid bits and extented attributes
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
# setcap =ep /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost' # will work because of cap_net_raw
PING localhost(localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.073 ms
^C
# setcap = /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
answered Apr 27 at 17:09
mosvymosvy
11k11340
edited 2 days ago
answered Apr 27 at 17:09
mosvymosvy
11k11340
answered Apr 27 at 17:09
mosvymosvy
11k11340
answered Apr 27 at 17:09
mosvymosvy
11k11340
11k11340
add a comment |
add a comment |
The capabilities are put in the permitted set (p), and all permitted capabilities are copied into the effective set (e). There does not seem to be any capabilities in your example (where did you get it from?).
The e is used for legacy programs (possibly most programs at the current time), that is programs that don't know about capabilities, so can not them-selves copy capabilities from permitted to effective.
answered Apr 27 at 16:48
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
add a comment |
The capabilities are put in the permitted set (p), and all permitted capabilities are copied into the effective set (e). There does not seem to be any capabilities in your example (where did you get it from?).
The e is used for legacy programs (possibly most programs at the current time), that is programs that don't know about capabilities, so can not them-selves copy capabilities from permitted to effective.
answered Apr 27 at 16:48
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
add a comment |
The capabilities are put in the permitted set (p), and all permitted capabilities are copied into the effective set (e). There does not seem to be any capabilities in your example (where did you get it from?).
The e is used for legacy programs (possibly most programs at the current time), that is programs that don't know about capabilities, so can not them-selves copy capabilities from permitted to effective.
answered Apr 27 at 16:48
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
The capabilities are put in the permitted set (p), and all permitted capabilities are copied into the effective set (e). There does not seem to be any capabilities in your example (where did you get it from?).
The e is used for legacy programs (possibly most programs at the current time), that is programs that don't know about capabilities, so can not them-selves copy capabilities from permitted to effective.
answered Apr 27 at 16:48
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
answered Apr 27 at 16:48
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
answered Apr 27 at 16:48
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
answered Apr 27 at 16:48
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
12.7k52663
add a comment |
add a comment |
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f515881%2fwhat-does-the-ep-capability-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
capabilities(7)have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.– mosvy
Apr 27 at 16:36
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 16:43
@Jesse_b that's wrong, there's no "special case" of empty capabilities. That guy was simply confused by the syntax.
setcap =ep filewill turn all capabilities on,setcap = filewill turn them all off (make them empty) andsetcap -r filewill remove them completely.– mosvy
Apr 27 at 20:41
@mosvy: Dew hwat?
– Jesse_b
Apr 27 at 20:58