What route did the Hindenburg take when traveling from Germany to the U.S.?When did pilots experience blackouts and redouts for the first time?
Is Cola "probably the best-known" Latin word in the world? If not, which might it be?
In a vacuum triode, what prevents the grid from acting as another anode?
Was Unix ever a single-user OS?
Why do we use caret (^) as the symbol for ctrl/control?
Can't remove one character of space in my environment
Type-check an expression
How to give very negative feedback gracefully?
Is it cheaper to drop cargo than to land it?
Does a wine bottle stopper require tevillah?
Virus Detected - Please execute anti-virus code
How to make a newline without autoindent
Is induction neccessary for proving that every injective mapping of a finite set into itself is a mapping onto itself?
Would a 1/1 token with persist dying trigger on death effects a second time?
Unknowingly ran an infinite loop in terminal
Moving the subject of the sentence into a dangling participle
Upside-Down Pyramid Addition...REVERSED!
What happens if I start too many background jobs?
Accidentally deleted the "/usr/share" folder
How can I get a job without pushing my family's income into a higher tax bracket?
Answer "Justification for travel support" in conference registration form
What is the most remote airport from the center of the city it supposedly serves?
Why do money exchangers give different rates to different bills?
Do I really need diodes to receive MIDI?
60s (or earlier) SF short story with FTL Travel using electron psychology aka addiclenendar technology
What route did the Hindenburg take when traveling from Germany to the U.S.?
When did pilots experience blackouts and redouts for the first time?
Today's passenger jets travel the shortest (northern) route, which takes them over Iceland, Greenland, and Newfoundland.
However, that's where the Hindenburg would have encountered the Westerlies, blowing in the opposite direction. I don't think it was capable of rising to sufficient altitude to avoid them.
The trade winds blow well south of that latitude. The southern route is considerably longer.
I haven't been able to find any charts so far.
1930s aviation
edited Apr 27 at 16:54
sempaiscuba♦
56.5k6196253
asked Apr 27 at 16:47
RickyRicky
1,9141227
add a comment |
Today's passenger jets travel the shortest (northern) route, which takes them over Iceland, Greenland, and Newfoundland.
However, that's where the Hindenburg would have encountered the Westerlies, blowing in the opposite direction. I don't think it was capable of rising to sufficient altitude to avoid them.
The trade winds blow well south of that latitude. The southern route is considerably longer.
I haven't been able to find any charts so far.
1930s aviation
edited Apr 27 at 16:54
sempaiscuba♦
56.5k6196253
asked Apr 27 at 16:47
RickyRicky
1,9141227
add a comment |
Today's passenger jets travel the shortest (northern) route, which takes them over Iceland, Greenland, and Newfoundland.
However, that's where the Hindenburg would have encountered the Westerlies, blowing in the opposite direction. I don't think it was capable of rising to sufficient altitude to avoid them.
The trade winds blow well south of that latitude. The southern route is considerably longer.
I haven't been able to find any charts so far.
1930s aviation
edited Apr 27 at 16:54
sempaiscuba♦
56.5k6196253
asked Apr 27 at 16:47
RickyRicky
1,9141227
Today's passenger jets travel the shortest (northern) route, which takes them over Iceland, Greenland, and Newfoundland.
However, that's where the Hindenburg would have encountered the Westerlies, blowing in the opposite direction. I don't think it was capable of rising to sufficient altitude to avoid them.
The trade winds blow well south of that latitude. The southern route is considerably longer.
I haven't been able to find any charts so far.
1930s aviation
1930s aviation
edited Apr 27 at 16:54
sempaiscuba♦
56.5k6196253
asked Apr 27 at 16:47
RickyRicky
1,9141227
edited Apr 27 at 16:54
sempaiscuba♦
56.5k6196253
asked Apr 27 at 16:47
RickyRicky
1,9141227
edited Apr 27 at 16:54
sempaiscuba♦
56.5k6196253
edited Apr 27 at 16:54
sempaiscuba♦
56.5k6196253
edited Apr 27 at 16:54
sempaiscuba♦
56.5k6196253
56.5k6196253
asked Apr 27 at 16:47
RickyRicky
1,9141227
asked Apr 27 at 16:47
RickyRicky
1,9141227
asked Apr 27 at 16:47
RickyRicky
1,9141227
1,9141227
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Airships.net has a page which documents the flights of the Hindenburg. It includes dates, departures, and arrivals and has maps showing the eastbound and westbound flight-paths taken:
(click to enlarge)
I assume the numbers on the charts represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936. The fourth flight of 1936 (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min).
If that chart really is the 10 transatlantic crossings by the Hindenburg in 1936, then interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, the flight at the highest latitudes was also the fastest. I'm guessing that the weather must have cooperated on that occasion. Unfortunately, the closest weather map I've been able to find was dated 15 June 1936, some two weeks before the flight.
Times taken by flights on the eastbound route, from Lakehurst to Frankfurt, were generally faster, as you would expect.
answered Apr 27 at 16:52
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56.5k6196253
2
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
Apr 27 at 16:57
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
Apr 27 at 17:03
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
Apr 27 at 17:31
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52338%2fwhat-route-did-the-hindenburg-take-when-traveling-from-germany-to-the-u-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Airships.net has a page which documents the flights of the Hindenburg. It includes dates, departures, and arrivals and has maps showing the eastbound and westbound flight-paths taken:
(click to enlarge)
I assume the numbers on the charts represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936. The fourth flight of 1936 (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min).
If that chart really is the 10 transatlantic crossings by the Hindenburg in 1936, then interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, the flight at the highest latitudes was also the fastest. I'm guessing that the weather must have cooperated on that occasion. Unfortunately, the closest weather map I've been able to find was dated 15 June 1936, some two weeks before the flight.
Times taken by flights on the eastbound route, from Lakehurst to Frankfurt, were generally faster, as you would expect.
answered Apr 27 at 16:52
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56.5k6196253
2
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
Apr 27 at 16:57
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
Apr 27 at 17:03
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
Apr 27 at 17:31
add a comment |
Airships.net has a page which documents the flights of the Hindenburg. It includes dates, departures, and arrivals and has maps showing the eastbound and westbound flight-paths taken:
(click to enlarge)
I assume the numbers on the charts represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936. The fourth flight of 1936 (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min).
If that chart really is the 10 transatlantic crossings by the Hindenburg in 1936, then interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, the flight at the highest latitudes was also the fastest. I'm guessing that the weather must have cooperated on that occasion. Unfortunately, the closest weather map I've been able to find was dated 15 June 1936, some two weeks before the flight.
Times taken by flights on the eastbound route, from Lakehurst to Frankfurt, were generally faster, as you would expect.
answered Apr 27 at 16:52
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56.5k6196253
2
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
Apr 27 at 16:57
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
Apr 27 at 17:03
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
Apr 27 at 17:31
add a comment |
Airships.net has a page which documents the flights of the Hindenburg. It includes dates, departures, and arrivals and has maps showing the eastbound and westbound flight-paths taken:
(click to enlarge)
I assume the numbers on the charts represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936. The fourth flight of 1936 (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min).
If that chart really is the 10 transatlantic crossings by the Hindenburg in 1936, then interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, the flight at the highest latitudes was also the fastest. I'm guessing that the weather must have cooperated on that occasion. Unfortunately, the closest weather map I've been able to find was dated 15 June 1936, some two weeks before the flight.
Times taken by flights on the eastbound route, from Lakehurst to Frankfurt, were generally faster, as you would expect.
answered Apr 27 at 16:52
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56.5k6196253
Airships.net has a page which documents the flights of the Hindenburg. It includes dates, departures, and arrivals and has maps showing the eastbound and westbound flight-paths taken:
(click to enlarge)
I assume the numbers on the charts represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936. The fourth flight of 1936 (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min).
If that chart really is the 10 transatlantic crossings by the Hindenburg in 1936, then interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, the flight at the highest latitudes was also the fastest. I'm guessing that the weather must have cooperated on that occasion. Unfortunately, the closest weather map I've been able to find was dated 15 June 1936, some two weeks before the flight.
Times taken by flights on the eastbound route, from Lakehurst to Frankfurt, were generally faster, as you would expect.
answered Apr 27 at 16:52
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56.5k6196253
edited Apr 27 at 18:08
answered Apr 27 at 16:52
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56.5k6196253
answered Apr 27 at 16:52
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56.5k6196253
answered Apr 27 at 16:52
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56.5k6196253
56.5k6196253
2
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
Apr 27 at 16:57
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
Apr 27 at 17:03
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
Apr 27 at 17:31
add a comment |
2
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
Apr 27 at 16:57
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
Apr 27 at 17:03
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
Apr 27 at 17:31
2
2
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
Apr 27 at 16:57
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
Apr 27 at 16:57
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
Apr 27 at 17:03
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
Apr 27 at 17:03
1
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
Apr 27 at 17:31
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
Apr 27 at 17:31
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52338%2fwhat-route-did-the-hindenburg-take-when-traveling-from-germany-to-the-u-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
