Why isn't the definition of absolute value applied when squaring a radical containing a variable?Different ways of defining Absolute ValueAdding $2$ absolute values together: $|x+2| + |x-3| =5.$Why does $|x_1| = |x_2| implies x_1 = pm x_2$Why does the integral $intfrac1x+idx$ not require the absolute value in the logarithm?The Definition of the Absolute ValueSpivak's Calculus 4th ed: Absolute value definition p. 11Solving Equations with Roots and Absolute ValuesAbsolute Value. Real AnalysisSolving Radical InequalitiesHow to get rid of the absolute value when solving a system of complex equations?

What actually is the vector of angular momentum?

A non-technological, repeating, phenomenon in the sky, holding its position in the sky for hours

What are the differences between credential stuffing and password spraying?

Confused about proofs by contradiction, the Law of the Excluded Middle and existence of consistent axiomatic systems.

What happens if I start too many background jobs?

Upside-Down Pyramid Addition...REVERSED!

In a vacuum triode, what prevents the grid from acting as another anode?

Do I really need diodes to receive MIDI?

Why do money exchangers give different rates to different bills?

Are we obligated to aspire to be Talmidei Chachamim?

Does this article imply that Turing-Computability is not the same as "effectively computable"?

What happens to matryoshka Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansions?

Did we get closer to another plane than we were supposed to, or was the pilot just protecting our delicate sensibilities?

How to reply this mail from potential PhD professor?

Why is B♯ higher than C♭ in 31-ET?

Why wasn't the Night King naked in S08E03?

What is the unit of the area when geometry attributes are calculated in QGIS?

In Avengers 1, why does Thanos need Loki?

Should one double the thirds or the fifth in chords?

Missed the connecting flight, separate tickets on same airline - who is responsible?

What is the most remote airport from the center of the city it supposedly serves?

Would "lab meat" be able to feed a much larger global population

Besides the up and down quark, what other quarks are present in daily matter around us?

What is a "listed natural gas appliance"?



Why isn't the definition of absolute value applied when squaring a radical containing a variable?


Different ways of defining Absolute ValueAdding $2$ absolute values together: $|x+2| + |x-3| =5.$Why does $|x_1| = |x_2| implies x_1 = pm x_2$Why does the integral $intfrac1x+idx$ not require the absolute value in the logarithm?The Definition of the Absolute ValueSpivak's Calculus 4th ed: Absolute value definition p. 11Solving Equations with Roots and Absolute ValuesAbsolute Value. Real AnalysisSolving Radical InequalitiesHow to get rid of the absolute value when solving a system of complex equations?













5












$begingroup$


I recently learned about the following definition of absolute value:




$|a| = sqrta^2$




Then I came across a solution to a problem that had the following step:




$5 geq sqrt5 - x$




In order to proceed, we had to square both sides:




$5^2 geq (sqrt5 - x)^2$




With the aforementioned definition of absolute value in mind, I wrote:




$25 geq |5 - x|$




But the actual solution turned out to be:




$25 geq 5 - x$




I don't understand why the absolute value definition wasn't applied here. Can anyone tell me why?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – user647486
    Apr 27 at 14:41







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    2 days ago
















5












$begingroup$


I recently learned about the following definition of absolute value:




$|a| = sqrta^2$




Then I came across a solution to a problem that had the following step:




$5 geq sqrt5 - x$




In order to proceed, we had to square both sides:




$5^2 geq (sqrt5 - x)^2$




With the aforementioned definition of absolute value in mind, I wrote:




$25 geq |5 - x|$




But the actual solution turned out to be:




$25 geq 5 - x$




I don't understand why the absolute value definition wasn't applied here. Can anyone tell me why?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – user647486
    Apr 27 at 14:41







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    2 days ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$


I recently learned about the following definition of absolute value:




$|a| = sqrta^2$




Then I came across a solution to a problem that had the following step:




$5 geq sqrt5 - x$




In order to proceed, we had to square both sides:




$5^2 geq (sqrt5 - x)^2$




With the aforementioned definition of absolute value in mind, I wrote:




$25 geq |5 - x|$




But the actual solution turned out to be:




$25 geq 5 - x$




I don't understand why the absolute value definition wasn't applied here. Can anyone tell me why?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I recently learned about the following definition of absolute value:




$|a| = sqrta^2$




Then I came across a solution to a problem that had the following step:




$5 geq sqrt5 - x$




In order to proceed, we had to square both sides:




$5^2 geq (sqrt5 - x)^2$




With the aforementioned definition of absolute value in mind, I wrote:




$25 geq |5 - x|$




But the actual solution turned out to be:




$25 geq 5 - x$




I don't understand why the absolute value definition wasn't applied here. Can anyone tell me why?







algebra-precalculus radicals absolute-value






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Apr 27 at 14:30









CalculemusCalculemus

439317




439317







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – user647486
    Apr 27 at 14:41







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    2 days ago













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – user647486
    Apr 27 at 14:41







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    2 days ago








2




2




$begingroup$
It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Apr 27 at 14:41





$begingroup$
It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Apr 27 at 14:41





4




4




$begingroup$
Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
2 days ago





$begingroup$
Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
2 days ago











5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

From the fact that you can take $sqrt 5-x$ you know that $5-x ge 0$ so you don't need the absolute value signs.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
    $endgroup$
    – steven gregory
    Apr 27 at 14:42






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    @stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Apr 27 at 16:42


















14












$begingroup$

Indeed, $sqrta^2=lvert arvert$. But $sqrt a^2=a$ (assuming that $ageqslant0$), not $lvert arvert$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
    $endgroup$
    – Barranka
    Apr 27 at 20:41







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Apr 27 at 20:45







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
    $endgroup$
    – Hayden
    Apr 27 at 22:03


















13












$begingroup$

$$left(sqrt aright)^2nesqrta^2.$$



Try with $a=-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    To compare $sqrt5-x$ to $sqrta^2$ you must compare $5-x$ to $a^2$. The problem is that $a^2 ge 0$ while $5-x$ can be any real number. But if you add the restriction $5-x ge 0$, then $25 geq |5 - x|$ becomes



    $$text$25 geq 5 - x textand 5-x ge 0$$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      If you look carefully, you'll notice your definition has the square inside
      the square root (not outside):
      $$|a| = sqrta^2$$
      However, in your solution you seem to assume that:
      $$sqrta^2 = (sqrta)^2$$
      However,
      $$sqrta^2 neq (sqrta)^2$$
      For example, as others have suggested, if $a = -1$
      we have:
      $$sqrta^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$$
      but
      $$(sqrta)^2 = (sqrt-1)^2 = i^2 = -1$$






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      user669329 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$













        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3204507%2fwhy-isnt-the-definition-of-absolute-value-applied-when-squaring-a-radical-conta%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        6












        $begingroup$

        From the fact that you can take $sqrt 5-x$ you know that $5-x ge 0$ so you don't need the absolute value signs.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$








        • 5




          $begingroup$
          You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
          $endgroup$
          – steven gregory
          Apr 27 at 14:42






        • 7




          $begingroup$
          @stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
          $endgroup$
          – Paul Sinclair
          Apr 27 at 16:42















        6












        $begingroup$

        From the fact that you can take $sqrt 5-x$ you know that $5-x ge 0$ so you don't need the absolute value signs.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$








        • 5




          $begingroup$
          You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
          $endgroup$
          – steven gregory
          Apr 27 at 14:42






        • 7




          $begingroup$
          @stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
          $endgroup$
          – Paul Sinclair
          Apr 27 at 16:42













        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        From the fact that you can take $sqrt 5-x$ you know that $5-x ge 0$ so you don't need the absolute value signs.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        From the fact that you can take $sqrt 5-x$ you know that $5-x ge 0$ so you don't need the absolute value signs.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 27 at 14:33









        Ross MillikanRoss Millikan

        303k24201375




        303k24201375







        • 5




          $begingroup$
          You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
          $endgroup$
          – steven gregory
          Apr 27 at 14:42






        • 7




          $begingroup$
          @stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
          $endgroup$
          – Paul Sinclair
          Apr 27 at 16:42












        • 5




          $begingroup$
          You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
          $endgroup$
          – steven gregory
          Apr 27 at 14:42






        • 7




          $begingroup$
          @stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
          $endgroup$
          – Paul Sinclair
          Apr 27 at 16:42







        5




        5




        $begingroup$
        You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
        $endgroup$
        – steven gregory
        Apr 27 at 14:42




        $begingroup$
        You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
        $endgroup$
        – steven gregory
        Apr 27 at 14:42




        7




        7




        $begingroup$
        @stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
        $endgroup$
        – Paul Sinclair
        Apr 27 at 16:42




        $begingroup$
        @stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
        $endgroup$
        – Paul Sinclair
        Apr 27 at 16:42











        14












        $begingroup$

        Indeed, $sqrta^2=lvert arvert$. But $sqrt a^2=a$ (assuming that $ageqslant0$), not $lvert arvert$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$








        • 5




          $begingroup$
          Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
          $endgroup$
          – Barranka
          Apr 27 at 20:41







        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Apr 27 at 20:45







        • 2




          $begingroup$
          But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
          $endgroup$
          – Hayden
          Apr 27 at 22:03















        14












        $begingroup$

        Indeed, $sqrta^2=lvert arvert$. But $sqrt a^2=a$ (assuming that $ageqslant0$), not $lvert arvert$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$








        • 5




          $begingroup$
          Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
          $endgroup$
          – Barranka
          Apr 27 at 20:41







        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Apr 27 at 20:45







        • 2




          $begingroup$
          But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
          $endgroup$
          – Hayden
          Apr 27 at 22:03













        14












        14








        14





        $begingroup$

        Indeed, $sqrta^2=lvert arvert$. But $sqrt a^2=a$ (assuming that $ageqslant0$), not $lvert arvert$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Indeed, $sqrta^2=lvert arvert$. But $sqrt a^2=a$ (assuming that $ageqslant0$), not $lvert arvert$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 27 at 14:33









        José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

        179k24139254




        179k24139254







        • 5




          $begingroup$
          Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
          $endgroup$
          – Barranka
          Apr 27 at 20:41







        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Apr 27 at 20:45







        • 2




          $begingroup$
          But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
          $endgroup$
          – Hayden
          Apr 27 at 22:03












        • 5




          $begingroup$
          Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
          $endgroup$
          – Barranka
          Apr 27 at 20:41







        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Apr 27 at 20:45







        • 2




          $begingroup$
          But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
          $endgroup$
          – Hayden
          Apr 27 at 22:03







        5




        5




        $begingroup$
        Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
        $endgroup$
        – Barranka
        Apr 27 at 20:41





        $begingroup$
        Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
        $endgroup$
        – Barranka
        Apr 27 at 20:41





        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
        $endgroup$
        – José Carlos Santos
        Apr 27 at 20:45





        $begingroup$
        Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
        $endgroup$
        – José Carlos Santos
        Apr 27 at 20:45





        2




        2




        $begingroup$
        But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
        $endgroup$
        – Hayden
        Apr 27 at 22:03




        $begingroup$
        But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
        $endgroup$
        – Hayden
        Apr 27 at 22:03











        13












        $begingroup$

        $$left(sqrt aright)^2nesqrta^2.$$



        Try with $a=-1$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          13












          $begingroup$

          $$left(sqrt aright)^2nesqrta^2.$$



          Try with $a=-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            13












            13








            13





            $begingroup$

            $$left(sqrt aright)^2nesqrta^2.$$



            Try with $a=-1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            $$left(sqrt aright)^2nesqrta^2.$$



            Try with $a=-1$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Apr 27 at 14:32









            Yves DaoustYves Daoust

            135k676233




            135k676233





















                2












                $begingroup$

                To compare $sqrt5-x$ to $sqrta^2$ you must compare $5-x$ to $a^2$. The problem is that $a^2 ge 0$ while $5-x$ can be any real number. But if you add the restriction $5-x ge 0$, then $25 geq |5 - x|$ becomes



                $$text$25 geq 5 - x textand 5-x ge 0$$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  To compare $sqrt5-x$ to $sqrta^2$ you must compare $5-x$ to $a^2$. The problem is that $a^2 ge 0$ while $5-x$ can be any real number. But if you add the restriction $5-x ge 0$, then $25 geq |5 - x|$ becomes



                  $$text$25 geq 5 - x textand 5-x ge 0$$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    To compare $sqrt5-x$ to $sqrta^2$ you must compare $5-x$ to $a^2$. The problem is that $a^2 ge 0$ while $5-x$ can be any real number. But if you add the restriction $5-x ge 0$, then $25 geq |5 - x|$ becomes



                    $$text$25 geq 5 - x textand 5-x ge 0$$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    To compare $sqrt5-x$ to $sqrta^2$ you must compare $5-x$ to $a^2$. The problem is that $a^2 ge 0$ while $5-x$ can be any real number. But if you add the restriction $5-x ge 0$, then $25 geq |5 - x|$ becomes



                    $$text$25 geq 5 - x textand 5-x ge 0$$$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Apr 27 at 17:08









                    steven gregorysteven gregory

                    18.6k32459




                    18.6k32459





















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        If you look carefully, you'll notice your definition has the square inside
                        the square root (not outside):
                        $$|a| = sqrta^2$$
                        However, in your solution you seem to assume that:
                        $$sqrta^2 = (sqrta)^2$$
                        However,
                        $$sqrta^2 neq (sqrta)^2$$
                        For example, as others have suggested, if $a = -1$
                        we have:
                        $$sqrta^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$$
                        but
                        $$(sqrta)^2 = (sqrt-1)^2 = i^2 = -1$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        user669329 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                        $endgroup$

















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          If you look carefully, you'll notice your definition has the square inside
                          the square root (not outside):
                          $$|a| = sqrta^2$$
                          However, in your solution you seem to assume that:
                          $$sqrta^2 = (sqrta)^2$$
                          However,
                          $$sqrta^2 neq (sqrta)^2$$
                          For example, as others have suggested, if $a = -1$
                          we have:
                          $$sqrta^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$$
                          but
                          $$(sqrta)^2 = (sqrt-1)^2 = i^2 = -1$$






                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          user669329 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                          $endgroup$















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            If you look carefully, you'll notice your definition has the square inside
                            the square root (not outside):
                            $$|a| = sqrta^2$$
                            However, in your solution you seem to assume that:
                            $$sqrta^2 = (sqrta)^2$$
                            However,
                            $$sqrta^2 neq (sqrta)^2$$
                            For example, as others have suggested, if $a = -1$
                            we have:
                            $$sqrta^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$$
                            but
                            $$(sqrta)^2 = (sqrt-1)^2 = i^2 = -1$$






                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            user669329 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            $endgroup$



                            If you look carefully, you'll notice your definition has the square inside
                            the square root (not outside):
                            $$|a| = sqrta^2$$
                            However, in your solution you seem to assume that:
                            $$sqrta^2 = (sqrta)^2$$
                            However,
                            $$sqrta^2 neq (sqrta)^2$$
                            For example, as others have suggested, if $a = -1$
                            we have:
                            $$sqrta^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$$
                            but
                            $$(sqrta)^2 = (sqrt-1)^2 = i^2 = -1$$







                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            user669329 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer






                            New contributor




                            user669329 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            answered 2 days ago









                            user669329user669329

                            111




                            111




                            New contributor




                            user669329 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            New contributor





                            user669329 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            user669329 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3204507%2fwhy-isnt-the-definition-of-absolute-value-applied-when-squaring-a-radical-conta%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                                Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                                Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?