Why isn't the definition of absolute value applied when squaring a radical containing a variable?Different ways of defining Absolute ValueAdding $2$ absolute values together: $|x+2| + |x-3| =5.$Why does $|x_1| = |x_2| implies x_1 = pm x_2$Why does the integral $intfrac1x+idx$ not require the absolute value in the logarithm?The Definition of the Absolute ValueSpivak's Calculus 4th ed: Absolute value definition p. 11Solving Equations with Roots and Absolute ValuesAbsolute Value. Real AnalysisSolving Radical InequalitiesHow to get rid of the absolute value when solving a system of complex equations?
What actually is the vector of angular momentum?
A non-technological, repeating, phenomenon in the sky, holding its position in the sky for hours
What are the differences between credential stuffing and password spraying?
Confused about proofs by contradiction, the Law of the Excluded Middle and existence of consistent axiomatic systems.
What happens if I start too many background jobs?
Upside-Down Pyramid Addition...REVERSED!
In a vacuum triode, what prevents the grid from acting as another anode?
Do I really need diodes to receive MIDI?
Why do money exchangers give different rates to different bills?
Are we obligated to aspire to be Talmidei Chachamim?
Does this article imply that Turing-Computability is not the same as "effectively computable"?
What happens to matryoshka Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansions?
Did we get closer to another plane than we were supposed to, or was the pilot just protecting our delicate sensibilities?
How to reply this mail from potential PhD professor?
Why is B♯ higher than C♭ in 31-ET?
Why wasn't the Night King naked in S08E03?
What is the unit of the area when geometry attributes are calculated in QGIS?
In Avengers 1, why does Thanos need Loki?
Should one double the thirds or the fifth in chords?
Missed the connecting flight, separate tickets on same airline - who is responsible?
What is the most remote airport from the center of the city it supposedly serves?
Would "lab meat" be able to feed a much larger global population
Besides the up and down quark, what other quarks are present in daily matter around us?
What is a "listed natural gas appliance"?
Why isn't the definition of absolute value applied when squaring a radical containing a variable?
Different ways of defining Absolute ValueAdding $2$ absolute values together: $|x+2| + |x-3| =5.$Why does $|x_1| = |x_2| implies x_1 = pm x_2$Why does the integral $intfrac1x+idx$ not require the absolute value in the logarithm?The Definition of the Absolute ValueSpivak's Calculus 4th ed: Absolute value definition p. 11Solving Equations with Roots and Absolute ValuesAbsolute Value. Real AnalysisSolving Radical InequalitiesHow to get rid of the absolute value when solving a system of complex equations?
$begingroup$
I recently learned about the following definition of absolute value:
$|a| = sqrta^2$
Then I came across a solution to a problem that had the following step:
$5 geq sqrt5 - x$
In order to proceed, we had to square both sides:
$5^2 geq (sqrt5 - x)^2$
With the aforementioned definition of absolute value in mind, I wrote:
$25 geq |5 - x|$
But the actual solution turned out to be:
$25 geq 5 - x$
I don't understand why the absolute value definition wasn't applied here. Can anyone tell me why?
algebra-precalculus radicals absolute-value
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I recently learned about the following definition of absolute value:
$|a| = sqrta^2$
Then I came across a solution to a problem that had the following step:
$5 geq sqrt5 - x$
In order to proceed, we had to square both sides:
$5^2 geq (sqrt5 - x)^2$
With the aforementioned definition of absolute value in mind, I wrote:
$25 geq |5 - x|$
But the actual solution turned out to be:
$25 geq 5 - x$
I don't understand why the absolute value definition wasn't applied here. Can anyone tell me why?
algebra-precalculus radicals absolute-value
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Apr 27 at 14:41
4
$begingroup$
Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I recently learned about the following definition of absolute value:
$|a| = sqrta^2$
Then I came across a solution to a problem that had the following step:
$5 geq sqrt5 - x$
In order to proceed, we had to square both sides:
$5^2 geq (sqrt5 - x)^2$
With the aforementioned definition of absolute value in mind, I wrote:
$25 geq |5 - x|$
But the actual solution turned out to be:
$25 geq 5 - x$
I don't understand why the absolute value definition wasn't applied here. Can anyone tell me why?
algebra-precalculus radicals absolute-value
$endgroup$
I recently learned about the following definition of absolute value:
$|a| = sqrta^2$
Then I came across a solution to a problem that had the following step:
$5 geq sqrt5 - x$
In order to proceed, we had to square both sides:
$5^2 geq (sqrt5 - x)^2$
With the aforementioned definition of absolute value in mind, I wrote:
$25 geq |5 - x|$
But the actual solution turned out to be:
$25 geq 5 - x$
I don't understand why the absolute value definition wasn't applied here. Can anyone tell me why?
algebra-precalculus radicals absolute-value
algebra-precalculus radicals absolute-value
asked Apr 27 at 14:30
CalculemusCalculemus
439317
439317
2
$begingroup$
It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Apr 27 at 14:41
4
$begingroup$
Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
2 days ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Apr 27 at 14:41
4
$begingroup$
Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
2 days ago
2
2
$begingroup$
It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Apr 27 at 14:41
$begingroup$
It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Apr 27 at 14:41
4
4
$begingroup$
Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
2 days ago
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From the fact that you can take $sqrt 5-x$ you know that $5-x ge 0$ so you don't need the absolute value signs.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
$endgroup$
– steven gregory
Apr 27 at 14:42
7
$begingroup$
@stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Apr 27 at 16:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Indeed, $sqrta^2=lvert arvert$. But $sqrt a^2=a$ (assuming that $ageqslant0$), not $lvert arvert$.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
$endgroup$
– Barranka
Apr 27 at 20:41
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Apr 27 at 20:45
2
$begingroup$
But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
$endgroup$
– Hayden
Apr 27 at 22:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$left(sqrt aright)^2nesqrta^2.$$
Try with $a=-1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To compare $sqrt5-x$ to $sqrta^2$ you must compare $5-x$ to $a^2$. The problem is that $a^2 ge 0$ while $5-x$ can be any real number. But if you add the restriction $5-x ge 0$, then $25 geq |5 - x|$ becomes
$$text$25 geq 5 - x textand 5-x ge 0$$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you look carefully, you'll notice your definition has the square inside
the square root (not outside):
$$|a| = sqrta^2$$
However, in your solution you seem to assume that:
$$sqrta^2 = (sqrta)^2$$
However,
$$sqrta^2 neq (sqrta)^2$$
For example, as others have suggested, if $a = -1$
we have:
$$sqrta^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$$
but
$$(sqrta)^2 = (sqrt-1)^2 = i^2 = -1$$
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3204507%2fwhy-isnt-the-definition-of-absolute-value-applied-when-squaring-a-radical-conta%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From the fact that you can take $sqrt 5-x$ you know that $5-x ge 0$ so you don't need the absolute value signs.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
$endgroup$
– steven gregory
Apr 27 at 14:42
7
$begingroup$
@stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Apr 27 at 16:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From the fact that you can take $sqrt 5-x$ you know that $5-x ge 0$ so you don't need the absolute value signs.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
$endgroup$
– steven gregory
Apr 27 at 14:42
7
$begingroup$
@stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Apr 27 at 16:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From the fact that you can take $sqrt 5-x$ you know that $5-x ge 0$ so you don't need the absolute value signs.
$endgroup$
From the fact that you can take $sqrt 5-x$ you know that $5-x ge 0$ so you don't need the absolute value signs.
answered Apr 27 at 14:33
Ross MillikanRoss Millikan
303k24201375
303k24201375
5
$begingroup$
You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
$endgroup$
– steven gregory
Apr 27 at 14:42
7
$begingroup$
@stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Apr 27 at 16:42
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
$endgroup$
– steven gregory
Apr 27 at 14:42
7
$begingroup$
@stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Apr 27 at 16:42
5
5
$begingroup$
You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
$endgroup$
– steven gregory
Apr 27 at 14:42
$begingroup$
You don't really "know that" $5-x ge 0$, rather you "must have" $5-x ge 0$; in either case, it follows that $|5-x| = 5-x$. So $25 ge |5-x|$ becomes $25 ge 5-x$.
$endgroup$
– steven gregory
Apr 27 at 14:42
7
7
$begingroup$
@stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Apr 27 at 16:42
$begingroup$
@stevengregory - I am curious what this great difference of meaning between "know that" and "must have" is. To me in this context, they are synonymous.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Apr 27 at 16:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Indeed, $sqrta^2=lvert arvert$. But $sqrt a^2=a$ (assuming that $ageqslant0$), not $lvert arvert$.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
$endgroup$
– Barranka
Apr 27 at 20:41
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Apr 27 at 20:45
2
$begingroup$
But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
$endgroup$
– Hayden
Apr 27 at 22:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Indeed, $sqrta^2=lvert arvert$. But $sqrt a^2=a$ (assuming that $ageqslant0$), not $lvert arvert$.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
$endgroup$
– Barranka
Apr 27 at 20:41
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Apr 27 at 20:45
2
$begingroup$
But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
$endgroup$
– Hayden
Apr 27 at 22:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Indeed, $sqrta^2=lvert arvert$. But $sqrt a^2=a$ (assuming that $ageqslant0$), not $lvert arvert$.
$endgroup$
Indeed, $sqrta^2=lvert arvert$. But $sqrt a^2=a$ (assuming that $ageqslant0$), not $lvert arvert$.
answered Apr 27 at 14:33
José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos
179k24139254
179k24139254
5
$begingroup$
Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
$endgroup$
– Barranka
Apr 27 at 20:41
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Apr 27 at 20:45
2
$begingroup$
But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
$endgroup$
– Hayden
Apr 27 at 22:03
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
$endgroup$
– Barranka
Apr 27 at 20:41
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Apr 27 at 20:45
2
$begingroup$
But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
$endgroup$
– Hayden
Apr 27 at 22:03
5
5
$begingroup$
Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
$endgroup$
– Barranka
Apr 27 at 20:41
$begingroup$
Indeed: Writing $ sqrta $ implies that $ a geq 0 $ if $a$ is a real number
$endgroup$
– Barranka
Apr 27 at 20:41
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Apr 27 at 20:45
$begingroup$
Yes, I know. But see the original context. This was applied to the inequality $5geqslantsqrt5-x$. The OP thought the one could conclude from it that $5^2geqslantlvert5-xrvert$, whereas the correct conclusion is that $5-xgeqslant0$ and that $5^2geqslant5-x$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Apr 27 at 20:45
2
2
$begingroup$
But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
$endgroup$
– Hayden
Apr 27 at 22:03
$begingroup$
But in that case $5-x = |5-x|$, so OP also isn't 'incorrect', per se, just missing an additional detail.
$endgroup$
– Hayden
Apr 27 at 22:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$left(sqrt aright)^2nesqrta^2.$$
Try with $a=-1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$left(sqrt aright)^2nesqrta^2.$$
Try with $a=-1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$left(sqrt aright)^2nesqrta^2.$$
Try with $a=-1$.
$endgroup$
$$left(sqrt aright)^2nesqrta^2.$$
Try with $a=-1$.
answered Apr 27 at 14:32
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
135k676233
135k676233
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To compare $sqrt5-x$ to $sqrta^2$ you must compare $5-x$ to $a^2$. The problem is that $a^2 ge 0$ while $5-x$ can be any real number. But if you add the restriction $5-x ge 0$, then $25 geq |5 - x|$ becomes
$$text$25 geq 5 - x textand 5-x ge 0$$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To compare $sqrt5-x$ to $sqrta^2$ you must compare $5-x$ to $a^2$. The problem is that $a^2 ge 0$ while $5-x$ can be any real number. But if you add the restriction $5-x ge 0$, then $25 geq |5 - x|$ becomes
$$text$25 geq 5 - x textand 5-x ge 0$$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To compare $sqrt5-x$ to $sqrta^2$ you must compare $5-x$ to $a^2$. The problem is that $a^2 ge 0$ while $5-x$ can be any real number. But if you add the restriction $5-x ge 0$, then $25 geq |5 - x|$ becomes
$$text$25 geq 5 - x textand 5-x ge 0$$$
$endgroup$
To compare $sqrt5-x$ to $sqrta^2$ you must compare $5-x$ to $a^2$. The problem is that $a^2 ge 0$ while $5-x$ can be any real number. But if you add the restriction $5-x ge 0$, then $25 geq |5 - x|$ becomes
$$text$25 geq 5 - x textand 5-x ge 0$$$
answered Apr 27 at 17:08
steven gregorysteven gregory
18.6k32459
18.6k32459
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you look carefully, you'll notice your definition has the square inside
the square root (not outside):
$$|a| = sqrta^2$$
However, in your solution you seem to assume that:
$$sqrta^2 = (sqrta)^2$$
However,
$$sqrta^2 neq (sqrta)^2$$
For example, as others have suggested, if $a = -1$
we have:
$$sqrta^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$$
but
$$(sqrta)^2 = (sqrt-1)^2 = i^2 = -1$$
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you look carefully, you'll notice your definition has the square inside
the square root (not outside):
$$|a| = sqrta^2$$
However, in your solution you seem to assume that:
$$sqrta^2 = (sqrta)^2$$
However,
$$sqrta^2 neq (sqrta)^2$$
For example, as others have suggested, if $a = -1$
we have:
$$sqrta^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$$
but
$$(sqrta)^2 = (sqrt-1)^2 = i^2 = -1$$
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you look carefully, you'll notice your definition has the square inside
the square root (not outside):
$$|a| = sqrta^2$$
However, in your solution you seem to assume that:
$$sqrta^2 = (sqrta)^2$$
However,
$$sqrta^2 neq (sqrta)^2$$
For example, as others have suggested, if $a = -1$
we have:
$$sqrta^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$$
but
$$(sqrta)^2 = (sqrt-1)^2 = i^2 = -1$$
New contributor
$endgroup$
If you look carefully, you'll notice your definition has the square inside
the square root (not outside):
$$|a| = sqrta^2$$
However, in your solution you seem to assume that:
$$sqrta^2 = (sqrta)^2$$
However,
$$sqrta^2 neq (sqrta)^2$$
For example, as others have suggested, if $a = -1$
we have:
$$sqrta^2 = sqrt(-1)^2 = sqrt1 = 1$$
but
$$(sqrta)^2 = (sqrt-1)^2 = i^2 = -1$$
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
user669329user669329
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3204507%2fwhy-isnt-the-definition-of-absolute-value-applied-when-squaring-a-radical-conta%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
It is applied. What you need to note is that the operation of squaring both sides of an inequality is not an equivalent transformation, like adding the same amount on both sides is. The inequality before squaring implies the inequality after squaring, but the reverse implication is not satisfied. So, when you square the new inequality has all solutions of the original, but it might have additional solutions. So, when you square you do apply the absolute value, since this is in the definition of $sqrt $, but after solving the resulting inequality, you need to check for false solutions.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Apr 27 at 14:41
4
$begingroup$
Actually the solution should be $25 geq 5 - x geq 0 implies -20 le x le 5$
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
2 days ago