What is meant by the term “i386” on the Ubuntu ISO file name? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How do I boot Ubuntu in VirtualBox complaining that my CPU is incompatible?Which ubuntu 12.04.3 is best for Device lc2430i ?This kernel requires an x84-64 CPU, but only detected an i686 CPUIntel Microcode Necessary?What is it with Ubuntu / Linux, Youtube / HTML5 videos and the high CPU load?logger -s prints <13> in Ubuntu 16 LTSSkipping acquire of configured file 'xxxx' as repository 'xxxx xenial InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'i386'"Behavior of powersave freq governor when cpu quota is setWhy is gcc-4.8 and gcc-5 on Ubuntu 16.04 linking to the same libgomp.so?Does an Intel 1.80GHz quad core processor meet the 2GHz dual core processor system requirements?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

How much radiation do nuclear physics experiments expose researchers to nowadays?

Does accepting a pardon have any bearing on trying that person for the same crime in a sovereign jurisdiction?

Is a manifold-with-boundary with given interior and non-empty boundary essentially unique?

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

When -s is used with third person singular. What's its use in this context?

Does surprise arrest existing movement?

Sorting numerically

How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Gastric acid as a weapon

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages

What is the correct way to use the pinch test for dehydration?

What does '1 unit of lemon juice' mean in a grandma's drink recipe?

Antler Helmet: Can it work?

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

Is the address of a local variable a constexpr?

3 doors, three guards, one stone

What's the difference between `auto x = vector<int>()` and `vector<int> x`?

Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters

Diagram with tikz

The logistics of corpse disposal

Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?



What is meant by the term “i386” on the Ubuntu ISO file name?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How do I boot Ubuntu in VirtualBox complaining that my CPU is incompatible?Which ubuntu 12.04.3 is best for Device lc2430i ?This kernel requires an x84-64 CPU, but only detected an i686 CPUIntel Microcode Necessary?What is it with Ubuntu / Linux, Youtube / HTML5 videos and the high CPU load?logger -s prints <13> in Ubuntu 16 LTSSkipping acquire of configured file 'xxxx' as repository 'xxxx xenial InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'i386'"Behavior of powersave freq governor when cpu quota is setWhy is gcc-4.8 and gcc-5 on Ubuntu 16.04 linking to the same libgomp.so?Does an Intel 1.80GHz quad core processor meet the 2GHz dual core processor system requirements?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I am trying to understand the different terminologies associated with the different CPU versions.



Ubuntu 16.04 uses the term "i386" to refer to their 32-bit version of Ubuntu:



http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/yakkety/ubuntu-16.10-desktop-i386.iso



Does the term "i386" here mean that this version of Ubuntu can work on the Intel 80386 CPU (which was introduced in 1985), or does the term "i386" here just mean that this version of Ubuntu works on the CPUs that are decedents from the Intel 80386 CPU?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

    – guiverc
    yesterday


















2















I am trying to understand the different terminologies associated with the different CPU versions.



Ubuntu 16.04 uses the term "i386" to refer to their 32-bit version of Ubuntu:



http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/yakkety/ubuntu-16.10-desktop-i386.iso



Does the term "i386" here mean that this version of Ubuntu can work on the Intel 80386 CPU (which was introduced in 1985), or does the term "i386" here just mean that this version of Ubuntu works on the CPUs that are decedents from the Intel 80386 CPU?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

    – guiverc
    yesterday














2












2








2








I am trying to understand the different terminologies associated with the different CPU versions.



Ubuntu 16.04 uses the term "i386" to refer to their 32-bit version of Ubuntu:



http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/yakkety/ubuntu-16.10-desktop-i386.iso



Does the term "i386" here mean that this version of Ubuntu can work on the Intel 80386 CPU (which was introduced in 1985), or does the term "i386" here just mean that this version of Ubuntu works on the CPUs that are decedents from the Intel 80386 CPU?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I am trying to understand the different terminologies associated with the different CPU versions.



Ubuntu 16.04 uses the term "i386" to refer to their 32-bit version of Ubuntu:



http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/yakkety/ubuntu-16.10-desktop-i386.iso



Does the term "i386" here mean that this version of Ubuntu can work on the Intel 80386 CPU (which was introduced in 1985), or does the term "i386" here just mean that this version of Ubuntu works on the CPUs that are decedents from the Intel 80386 CPU?







16.04 cpu terminology






share|improve this question







New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









user7681202user7681202

1111




1111




New contributor




user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user7681202 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

    – guiverc
    yesterday


















  • Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

    – guiverc
    yesterday

















Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

– guiverc
yesterday






Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes. The 18.10 x86 ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class. Descendants of x86 30386 would be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686

– guiverc
yesterday











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














The Intel 80386, also known as the i386, or just 386, was a 32-bit microprocessor introduced by Intel in 1985. This is termed x86, IA-32, or the i386-architecture, depending on context.



x86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set. It supports vastly larger virtual and physical address spaces than are possible on x86, thereby allowing programmers to conveniently work with much larger data sets... After launching the architecture under the "x86-64" name, AMD renamed it AMD64... x86-64 is still used by many in the industry as a vendor-neutral term, while others, notably Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) and Microsoft, use x64.



So ubuntu ISO support both the flavours.



What is this Multiarch?



Multiarch lets you install library packages from multiple architectures on the same machine. This is useful in various ways, but the most common is installing both 64 and 32-bit software on the same machine and having dependencies correctly resolved automatically. In general you can have libraries of more than one architecture installed together and applications from one architecture or another installed as alternatives. Note that it does not enable multiple architecture versions of applications to be installed simultaneously.



$ dpkg --print-architecture
enter image description hereFigure-1: This Computer system has 64-bit Kernel Architecture.



Multi-arch support allows you to use 32-bit libraries alongside 64-bit libraries.



$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
enter image description hereFigure-2: This Computer system also supports i386 Architecture (i.e. supports 32-bit Libraries too).






share|improve this answer






























    0














    You are correct...



    i386 line has been introduced in 1985, and it was the first publically available Intel 32 bit chip. 80286 and (little known) 80186 were 16 bit, and 8086 and 8088 were 8 bit.



    In this sense when you see i368 in the package names and installation images it means that it requires 32 bit operations, but does not require 64 bit ones. Now although 32 bits were introduced rather fast, 64 bit operations were slowly fazed in. Pentium pro line already had some 64 bit operations, but i am unsure if it could do everything that current 64 bit architecture can do. Therefore you do not see a processor version for 64 bit packages, but they actually state that they are actually 64 bit.




    Trivia: Did you know that even today when your machine boots the processor wakes up as an 8 bit machine and then needs to be told by a bios that it can do more?






    share|improve this answer























    • x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

      – Henning Makholm
      yesterday



















    0














    Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The reason for this is Debian refers to all x86 (32-bit) as i386, and Ubuntu (downstream) has followed suit. (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en#idm181)



    The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes.



    The 18.10 flavor x86 desktop ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class.



    Yes, 'descendants of x86 30386' would thus be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686, and yes x86/i686 is still supported, but it now has minimal install options, and support is reduced (and may not extend to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, but 18.04 LTS still works with i686/x86/i386)






    share|improve this answer























    • I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

      – guiverc
      yesterday











    • I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

      – guiverc
      yesterday











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "89"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    user7681202 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1133736%2fwhat-is-meant-by-the-term-i386-on-the-ubuntu-iso-file-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    The Intel 80386, also known as the i386, or just 386, was a 32-bit microprocessor introduced by Intel in 1985. This is termed x86, IA-32, or the i386-architecture, depending on context.



    x86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set. It supports vastly larger virtual and physical address spaces than are possible on x86, thereby allowing programmers to conveniently work with much larger data sets... After launching the architecture under the "x86-64" name, AMD renamed it AMD64... x86-64 is still used by many in the industry as a vendor-neutral term, while others, notably Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) and Microsoft, use x64.



    So ubuntu ISO support both the flavours.



    What is this Multiarch?



    Multiarch lets you install library packages from multiple architectures on the same machine. This is useful in various ways, but the most common is installing both 64 and 32-bit software on the same machine and having dependencies correctly resolved automatically. In general you can have libraries of more than one architecture installed together and applications from one architecture or another installed as alternatives. Note that it does not enable multiple architecture versions of applications to be installed simultaneously.



    $ dpkg --print-architecture
    enter image description hereFigure-1: This Computer system has 64-bit Kernel Architecture.



    Multi-arch support allows you to use 32-bit libraries alongside 64-bit libraries.



    $ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
    enter image description hereFigure-2: This Computer system also supports i386 Architecture (i.e. supports 32-bit Libraries too).






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      The Intel 80386, also known as the i386, or just 386, was a 32-bit microprocessor introduced by Intel in 1985. This is termed x86, IA-32, or the i386-architecture, depending on context.



      x86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set. It supports vastly larger virtual and physical address spaces than are possible on x86, thereby allowing programmers to conveniently work with much larger data sets... After launching the architecture under the "x86-64" name, AMD renamed it AMD64... x86-64 is still used by many in the industry as a vendor-neutral term, while others, notably Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) and Microsoft, use x64.



      So ubuntu ISO support both the flavours.



      What is this Multiarch?



      Multiarch lets you install library packages from multiple architectures on the same machine. This is useful in various ways, but the most common is installing both 64 and 32-bit software on the same machine and having dependencies correctly resolved automatically. In general you can have libraries of more than one architecture installed together and applications from one architecture or another installed as alternatives. Note that it does not enable multiple architecture versions of applications to be installed simultaneously.



      $ dpkg --print-architecture
      enter image description hereFigure-1: This Computer system has 64-bit Kernel Architecture.



      Multi-arch support allows you to use 32-bit libraries alongside 64-bit libraries.



      $ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
      enter image description hereFigure-2: This Computer system also supports i386 Architecture (i.e. supports 32-bit Libraries too).






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        The Intel 80386, also known as the i386, or just 386, was a 32-bit microprocessor introduced by Intel in 1985. This is termed x86, IA-32, or the i386-architecture, depending on context.



        x86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set. It supports vastly larger virtual and physical address spaces than are possible on x86, thereby allowing programmers to conveniently work with much larger data sets... After launching the architecture under the "x86-64" name, AMD renamed it AMD64... x86-64 is still used by many in the industry as a vendor-neutral term, while others, notably Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) and Microsoft, use x64.



        So ubuntu ISO support both the flavours.



        What is this Multiarch?



        Multiarch lets you install library packages from multiple architectures on the same machine. This is useful in various ways, but the most common is installing both 64 and 32-bit software on the same machine and having dependencies correctly resolved automatically. In general you can have libraries of more than one architecture installed together and applications from one architecture or another installed as alternatives. Note that it does not enable multiple architecture versions of applications to be installed simultaneously.



        $ dpkg --print-architecture
        enter image description hereFigure-1: This Computer system has 64-bit Kernel Architecture.



        Multi-arch support allows you to use 32-bit libraries alongside 64-bit libraries.



        $ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
        enter image description hereFigure-2: This Computer system also supports i386 Architecture (i.e. supports 32-bit Libraries too).






        share|improve this answer













        The Intel 80386, also known as the i386, or just 386, was a 32-bit microprocessor introduced by Intel in 1985. This is termed x86, IA-32, or the i386-architecture, depending on context.



        x86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set. It supports vastly larger virtual and physical address spaces than are possible on x86, thereby allowing programmers to conveniently work with much larger data sets... After launching the architecture under the "x86-64" name, AMD renamed it AMD64... x86-64 is still used by many in the industry as a vendor-neutral term, while others, notably Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) and Microsoft, use x64.



        So ubuntu ISO support both the flavours.



        What is this Multiarch?



        Multiarch lets you install library packages from multiple architectures on the same machine. This is useful in various ways, but the most common is installing both 64 and 32-bit software on the same machine and having dependencies correctly resolved automatically. In general you can have libraries of more than one architecture installed together and applications from one architecture or another installed as alternatives. Note that it does not enable multiple architecture versions of applications to be installed simultaneously.



        $ dpkg --print-architecture
        enter image description hereFigure-1: This Computer system has 64-bit Kernel Architecture.



        Multi-arch support allows you to use 32-bit libraries alongside 64-bit libraries.



        $ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
        enter image description hereFigure-2: This Computer system also supports i386 Architecture (i.e. supports 32-bit Libraries too).







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        MarmayogiMarmayogi

        86047




        86047























            0














            You are correct...



            i386 line has been introduced in 1985, and it was the first publically available Intel 32 bit chip. 80286 and (little known) 80186 were 16 bit, and 8086 and 8088 were 8 bit.



            In this sense when you see i368 in the package names and installation images it means that it requires 32 bit operations, but does not require 64 bit ones. Now although 32 bits were introduced rather fast, 64 bit operations were slowly fazed in. Pentium pro line already had some 64 bit operations, but i am unsure if it could do everything that current 64 bit architecture can do. Therefore you do not see a processor version for 64 bit packages, but they actually state that they are actually 64 bit.




            Trivia: Did you know that even today when your machine boots the processor wakes up as an 8 bit machine and then needs to be told by a bios that it can do more?






            share|improve this answer























            • x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

              – Henning Makholm
              yesterday
















            0














            You are correct...



            i386 line has been introduced in 1985, and it was the first publically available Intel 32 bit chip. 80286 and (little known) 80186 were 16 bit, and 8086 and 8088 were 8 bit.



            In this sense when you see i368 in the package names and installation images it means that it requires 32 bit operations, but does not require 64 bit ones. Now although 32 bits were introduced rather fast, 64 bit operations were slowly fazed in. Pentium pro line already had some 64 bit operations, but i am unsure if it could do everything that current 64 bit architecture can do. Therefore you do not see a processor version for 64 bit packages, but they actually state that they are actually 64 bit.




            Trivia: Did you know that even today when your machine boots the processor wakes up as an 8 bit machine and then needs to be told by a bios that it can do more?






            share|improve this answer























            • x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

              – Henning Makholm
              yesterday














            0












            0








            0







            You are correct...



            i386 line has been introduced in 1985, and it was the first publically available Intel 32 bit chip. 80286 and (little known) 80186 were 16 bit, and 8086 and 8088 were 8 bit.



            In this sense when you see i368 in the package names and installation images it means that it requires 32 bit operations, but does not require 64 bit ones. Now although 32 bits were introduced rather fast, 64 bit operations were slowly fazed in. Pentium pro line already had some 64 bit operations, but i am unsure if it could do everything that current 64 bit architecture can do. Therefore you do not see a processor version for 64 bit packages, but they actually state that they are actually 64 bit.




            Trivia: Did you know that even today when your machine boots the processor wakes up as an 8 bit machine and then needs to be told by a bios that it can do more?






            share|improve this answer













            You are correct...



            i386 line has been introduced in 1985, and it was the first publically available Intel 32 bit chip. 80286 and (little known) 80186 were 16 bit, and 8086 and 8088 were 8 bit.



            In this sense when you see i368 in the package names and installation images it means that it requires 32 bit operations, but does not require 64 bit ones. Now although 32 bits were introduced rather fast, 64 bit operations were slowly fazed in. Pentium pro line already had some 64 bit operations, but i am unsure if it could do everything that current 64 bit architecture can do. Therefore you do not see a processor version for 64 bit packages, but they actually state that they are actually 64 bit.




            Trivia: Did you know that even today when your machine boots the processor wakes up as an 8 bit machine and then needs to be told by a bios that it can do more?







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            v010dyav010dya

            7022929




            7022929












            • x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

              – Henning Makholm
              yesterday


















            • x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

              – Henning Makholm
              yesterday

















            x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

            – Henning Makholm
            yesterday






            x86 processors have no "8-bit" mode. They wake up in 8086 compatibility mode which is 16 bit. You may have it confused with the 8088 which was used in the first IBM PCs -- but even that was a 16-bit core modified to work with 8-bit peripherals.

            – Henning Makholm
            yesterday












            0














            Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The reason for this is Debian refers to all x86 (32-bit) as i386, and Ubuntu (downstream) has followed suit. (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en#idm181)



            The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes.



            The 18.10 flavor x86 desktop ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class.



            Yes, 'descendants of x86 30386' would thus be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686, and yes x86/i686 is still supported, but it now has minimal install options, and support is reduced (and may not extend to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, but 18.04 LTS still works with i686/x86/i386)






            share|improve this answer























            • I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

              – guiverc
              yesterday











            • I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

              – guiverc
              yesterday















            0














            Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The reason for this is Debian refers to all x86 (32-bit) as i386, and Ubuntu (downstream) has followed suit. (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en#idm181)



            The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes.



            The 18.10 flavor x86 desktop ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class.



            Yes, 'descendants of x86 30386' would thus be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686, and yes x86/i686 is still supported, but it now has minimal install options, and support is reduced (and may not extend to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, but 18.04 LTS still works with i686/x86/i386)






            share|improve this answer























            • I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

              – guiverc
              yesterday











            • I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

              – guiverc
              yesterday













            0












            0








            0







            Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The reason for this is Debian refers to all x86 (32-bit) as i386, and Ubuntu (downstream) has followed suit. (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en#idm181)



            The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes.



            The 18.10 flavor x86 desktop ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class.



            Yes, 'descendants of x86 30386' would thus be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686, and yes x86/i686 is still supported, but it now has minimal install options, and support is reduced (and may not extend to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, but 18.04 LTS still works with i686/x86/i386)






            share|improve this answer













            Ubuntu hasn't changed the i386 term regardless of which x86 cpu it relates to. The reason for this is Debian refers to all x86 (32-bit) as i386, and Ubuntu (downstream) has followed suit. (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en#idm181)



            The last of the x86 ISOs for x86 require a i686 class of cpu, so no they won't boot & run on a 80386, 80486 or older cpu classes.



            The 18.10 flavor x86 desktop ISOs (Xubuntu, Lubuntu desktops, plus 19.04 ISO's up until they stopped being produced Dec-2018 for those flavors) however will boot on a pentium 4/pentium M grade single-core 686 class.



            Yes, 'descendants of x86 30386' would thus be correct using wording from your question. Even though many ISO's have stopped being produced, I have Lubuntu 19.04 kernel 5 running on a pentium 4 i686, and yes x86/i686 is still supported, but it now has minimal install options, and support is reduced (and may not extend to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, but 18.04 LTS still works with i686/x86/i386)







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            guivercguiverc

            5,18921723




            5,18921723












            • I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

              – guiverc
              yesterday











            • I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

              – guiverc
              yesterday

















            • I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

              – guiverc
              yesterday











            • I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

              – guiverc
              yesterday
















            I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

            – guiverc
            yesterday





            I looked for a good ubuntu reference (wiki/help) but didn't find one. The information is mostly release specific in lists.ubuntu.com ML notices with regard the dropping of x86 and what generation of cpu was required to boot each subsequent release (eg. as i386 moved to i586, i686 etc).

            – guiverc
            yesterday













            I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

            – guiverc
            yesterday





            I have a pentium 4 machine running Lubuntu 19.04 (5.0 kernel) on a (QA or quality-assurance) test box. Yes the machine would probably run mainstream Ubuntu 19.04 but is so under-powered I'd not want to try. When I referred to Mailing List notices; they were made only because upstream (eg. kernel, adobe or whoever) modified requirements for the upstream packages, so Canonical/Ubuntu just provided notice of the change when that package was in it's next release.

            – guiverc
            yesterday










            user7681202 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            user7681202 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            user7681202 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            user7681202 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1133736%2fwhat-is-meant-by-the-term-i386-on-the-ubuntu-iso-file-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?