What is the purpose of the side handle on a hand (“eggbeater”) drill?What kind of woods can be riven with a froe?What is the purpose of a saw nib?In what cases is it useful to have more than one of the same tool?What tool would this handle be for?What are the main different types of “hand drills”?How to get better at fitting joints and “seeing” bruises?Most general purpose hand plane for limited budgetTaking apart a pre-assembled deskPrecise 90 degree cuts on small piecesTips and Ideas for Hand Planing a 11,950 N board keeping it simple

What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?

What happens to Mjolnir (Thor's hammer) at the end of Endgame?

"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context

What is the philosophical significance of speech acts/implicature?

Apply MapThread to all but one variable

What happened to Captain America in Endgame?

Does a large simulator bay have standard public address announcements?

How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?

Relationship between strut and baselineskip

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

"You've called the wrong number" or "You called the wrong number"

How did Captain America manage to do this?

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

Should the Death Curse affect an undead PC in the Tomb of Annihilation adventure?

How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?

Alignment of various blocks in tikz

How to denote matrix elements succinctly?

Can we say “you can pay when the order gets ready”?

infinitely many negative and infinitely many positive numbers

a sore throat vs a strep throat vs strep throat

Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?

Classification of surfaces

Do I have an "anti-research" personality?



What is the purpose of the side handle on a hand (“eggbeater”) drill?


What kind of woods can be riven with a froe?What is the purpose of a saw nib?In what cases is it useful to have more than one of the same tool?What tool would this handle be for?What are the main different types of “hand drills”?How to get better at fitting joints and “seeing” bruises?Most general purpose hand plane for limited budgetTaking apart a pre-assembled deskPrecise 90 degree cuts on small piecesTips and Ideas for Hand Planing a 11,950 N board keeping it simple













6















What is the purpose of the side knob (circled in orange) on a hand or "eggbeater" drill? I can't remember ever using this handle for anything.



I'm considering cutting off the side knob so that the drill will fit better in my tool chest. Would this lead to any problems or loss of functionality?



Hand or "eggbeater" drill










share|improve this question







New contributor




SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 3





    it's another handle for convenience, if the top handle doesn't give you the stability you need. Note that for heavier drilling you'd have a top handle meant for leaning on with your chest. In this case, this looks like a medium/light model, so you'd use whatever handle was convenient for the work at hand. In this particular case you could still keep things square with the tripod of two hands and your chest, even if you couldn't fully bear down on it with your body.

    – jdv
    Apr 23 at 15:20







  • 1





    "loss of functionality?" I think so, but many others disagree and actively seek out drills without a side handle and if they have one they try to remove it if they can (because of the way they're fitted sometimes having a handle you don't use is preferable to having a rod of metal sticking out the side). If you do want to remove it in drills of this type the side handles tend to attach in one of 2 ways, either they're a push-fit on to a rod (no glue) or they're screwed on. So in either case fairly easy to remove without having to resort to sawing if you want to make the drill more compact.

    – Graphus
    Apr 23 at 19:41











  • If your drill does have a rod out the side and you want to remove that too, were you thinking of using a hacksaw to take it off? The body of these drills is steel and may be tool steel rather than mild, so it could be a bit of a workout! Easily tackled by a cutoff wheel in a suitable power tool though if you have something suitable.

    – Graphus
    Apr 23 at 19:43











  • Side handle unscrews on my Stanley drill ... no need to cut it off!

    – Brian Drummond
    Apr 23 at 21:36











  • convenience? No. leverage. Try drilling some metal and see how far you get w/o it.

    – Mazura
    Apr 24 at 3:07















6















What is the purpose of the side knob (circled in orange) on a hand or "eggbeater" drill? I can't remember ever using this handle for anything.



I'm considering cutting off the side knob so that the drill will fit better in my tool chest. Would this lead to any problems or loss of functionality?



Hand or "eggbeater" drill










share|improve this question







New contributor




SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 3





    it's another handle for convenience, if the top handle doesn't give you the stability you need. Note that for heavier drilling you'd have a top handle meant for leaning on with your chest. In this case, this looks like a medium/light model, so you'd use whatever handle was convenient for the work at hand. In this particular case you could still keep things square with the tripod of two hands and your chest, even if you couldn't fully bear down on it with your body.

    – jdv
    Apr 23 at 15:20







  • 1





    "loss of functionality?" I think so, but many others disagree and actively seek out drills without a side handle and if they have one they try to remove it if they can (because of the way they're fitted sometimes having a handle you don't use is preferable to having a rod of metal sticking out the side). If you do want to remove it in drills of this type the side handles tend to attach in one of 2 ways, either they're a push-fit on to a rod (no glue) or they're screwed on. So in either case fairly easy to remove without having to resort to sawing if you want to make the drill more compact.

    – Graphus
    Apr 23 at 19:41











  • If your drill does have a rod out the side and you want to remove that too, were you thinking of using a hacksaw to take it off? The body of these drills is steel and may be tool steel rather than mild, so it could be a bit of a workout! Easily tackled by a cutoff wheel in a suitable power tool though if you have something suitable.

    – Graphus
    Apr 23 at 19:43











  • Side handle unscrews on my Stanley drill ... no need to cut it off!

    – Brian Drummond
    Apr 23 at 21:36











  • convenience? No. leverage. Try drilling some metal and see how far you get w/o it.

    – Mazura
    Apr 24 at 3:07













6












6








6


1






What is the purpose of the side knob (circled in orange) on a hand or "eggbeater" drill? I can't remember ever using this handle for anything.



I'm considering cutting off the side knob so that the drill will fit better in my tool chest. Would this lead to any problems or loss of functionality?



Hand or "eggbeater" drill










share|improve this question







New contributor




SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












What is the purpose of the side knob (circled in orange) on a hand or "eggbeater" drill? I can't remember ever using this handle for anything.



I'm considering cutting off the side knob so that the drill will fit better in my tool chest. Would this lead to any problems or loss of functionality?



Hand or "eggbeater" drill







hand-tools drill tool-modification






share|improve this question







New contributor




SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 23 at 13:30









SpacemanSpiffSpacemanSpiff

313




313




New contributor




SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 3





    it's another handle for convenience, if the top handle doesn't give you the stability you need. Note that for heavier drilling you'd have a top handle meant for leaning on with your chest. In this case, this looks like a medium/light model, so you'd use whatever handle was convenient for the work at hand. In this particular case you could still keep things square with the tripod of two hands and your chest, even if you couldn't fully bear down on it with your body.

    – jdv
    Apr 23 at 15:20







  • 1





    "loss of functionality?" I think so, but many others disagree and actively seek out drills without a side handle and if they have one they try to remove it if they can (because of the way they're fitted sometimes having a handle you don't use is preferable to having a rod of metal sticking out the side). If you do want to remove it in drills of this type the side handles tend to attach in one of 2 ways, either they're a push-fit on to a rod (no glue) or they're screwed on. So in either case fairly easy to remove without having to resort to sawing if you want to make the drill more compact.

    – Graphus
    Apr 23 at 19:41











  • If your drill does have a rod out the side and you want to remove that too, were you thinking of using a hacksaw to take it off? The body of these drills is steel and may be tool steel rather than mild, so it could be a bit of a workout! Easily tackled by a cutoff wheel in a suitable power tool though if you have something suitable.

    – Graphus
    Apr 23 at 19:43











  • Side handle unscrews on my Stanley drill ... no need to cut it off!

    – Brian Drummond
    Apr 23 at 21:36











  • convenience? No. leverage. Try drilling some metal and see how far you get w/o it.

    – Mazura
    Apr 24 at 3:07












  • 3





    it's another handle for convenience, if the top handle doesn't give you the stability you need. Note that for heavier drilling you'd have a top handle meant for leaning on with your chest. In this case, this looks like a medium/light model, so you'd use whatever handle was convenient for the work at hand. In this particular case you could still keep things square with the tripod of two hands and your chest, even if you couldn't fully bear down on it with your body.

    – jdv
    Apr 23 at 15:20







  • 1





    "loss of functionality?" I think so, but many others disagree and actively seek out drills without a side handle and if they have one they try to remove it if they can (because of the way they're fitted sometimes having a handle you don't use is preferable to having a rod of metal sticking out the side). If you do want to remove it in drills of this type the side handles tend to attach in one of 2 ways, either they're a push-fit on to a rod (no glue) or they're screwed on. So in either case fairly easy to remove without having to resort to sawing if you want to make the drill more compact.

    – Graphus
    Apr 23 at 19:41











  • If your drill does have a rod out the side and you want to remove that too, were you thinking of using a hacksaw to take it off? The body of these drills is steel and may be tool steel rather than mild, so it could be a bit of a workout! Easily tackled by a cutoff wheel in a suitable power tool though if you have something suitable.

    – Graphus
    Apr 23 at 19:43











  • Side handle unscrews on my Stanley drill ... no need to cut it off!

    – Brian Drummond
    Apr 23 at 21:36











  • convenience? No. leverage. Try drilling some metal and see how far you get w/o it.

    – Mazura
    Apr 24 at 3:07







3




3





it's another handle for convenience, if the top handle doesn't give you the stability you need. Note that for heavier drilling you'd have a top handle meant for leaning on with your chest. In this case, this looks like a medium/light model, so you'd use whatever handle was convenient for the work at hand. In this particular case you could still keep things square with the tripod of two hands and your chest, even if you couldn't fully bear down on it with your body.

– jdv
Apr 23 at 15:20






it's another handle for convenience, if the top handle doesn't give you the stability you need. Note that for heavier drilling you'd have a top handle meant for leaning on with your chest. In this case, this looks like a medium/light model, so you'd use whatever handle was convenient for the work at hand. In this particular case you could still keep things square with the tripod of two hands and your chest, even if you couldn't fully bear down on it with your body.

– jdv
Apr 23 at 15:20





1




1





"loss of functionality?" I think so, but many others disagree and actively seek out drills without a side handle and if they have one they try to remove it if they can (because of the way they're fitted sometimes having a handle you don't use is preferable to having a rod of metal sticking out the side). If you do want to remove it in drills of this type the side handles tend to attach in one of 2 ways, either they're a push-fit on to a rod (no glue) or they're screwed on. So in either case fairly easy to remove without having to resort to sawing if you want to make the drill more compact.

– Graphus
Apr 23 at 19:41





"loss of functionality?" I think so, but many others disagree and actively seek out drills without a side handle and if they have one they try to remove it if they can (because of the way they're fitted sometimes having a handle you don't use is preferable to having a rod of metal sticking out the side). If you do want to remove it in drills of this type the side handles tend to attach in one of 2 ways, either they're a push-fit on to a rod (no glue) or they're screwed on. So in either case fairly easy to remove without having to resort to sawing if you want to make the drill more compact.

– Graphus
Apr 23 at 19:41













If your drill does have a rod out the side and you want to remove that too, were you thinking of using a hacksaw to take it off? The body of these drills is steel and may be tool steel rather than mild, so it could be a bit of a workout! Easily tackled by a cutoff wheel in a suitable power tool though if you have something suitable.

– Graphus
Apr 23 at 19:43





If your drill does have a rod out the side and you want to remove that too, were you thinking of using a hacksaw to take it off? The body of these drills is steel and may be tool steel rather than mild, so it could be a bit of a workout! Easily tackled by a cutoff wheel in a suitable power tool though if you have something suitable.

– Graphus
Apr 23 at 19:43













Side handle unscrews on my Stanley drill ... no need to cut it off!

– Brian Drummond
Apr 23 at 21:36





Side handle unscrews on my Stanley drill ... no need to cut it off!

– Brian Drummond
Apr 23 at 21:36













convenience? No. leverage. Try drilling some metal and see how far you get w/o it.

– Mazura
Apr 24 at 3:07





convenience? No. leverage. Try drilling some metal and see how far you get w/o it.

– Mazura
Apr 24 at 3:07










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















9














In my younger days, I had only this type of drill with which to bore holes. It was often necessary to place the in-line grip on my chest or belt to apply pressure. A board or similar panel provided some dispersal of force against the human body. The side handle served to stabilize the drill and to prevent rotation in an undesirable manner.



Addendum: something popped into my alleged mind during the day. The drill I would have used might have had a shoe. This image shows this feature, making the determination that much easier. Image courtesy of Shutterstock:



hand crank drill with shoe






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    That's a breast drill.

    – Mazura
    Apr 24 at 3:08











  • Yeah, your comments in the first paragraph still somewhat apply but a breast drill is a completely different animal to a standard hand drill and the side handle on a breast drill is mandatory, not a take-it-or-leave-it feature.

    – Graphus
    2 days ago


















3














"A" reason is that a drill may not spin its bit nicely and freely once in a material. If the bit "catches" (does not spin nicely and freely), thee entire apparatus will then be the focus of the torque.



Whichever of the two, the bit, or the entire-(not itself confronting the material's resistance like the bit does)-apparatus will tend to take the action of the torque and the not-the-bit components face only the resistance to movement that air provides, in addition to any resistance provided by any hold one has on the apparatus. In short:



If the bit stops, the entire rest of it wants to begin moving, and more so as one tries harder to make the bit move.



Unless one makes it harder for the apparatus to move, the bit will not begin moving and one is not really achieving the assumed goal.



One's hold on the operating handle is part of that and any resistance pressing against the "shoe" (shown in fred_dot_u's picture), is helpful. However, the only direct action resisting the apparatus spinning so far is resistance through the operating handle and the torque and force one places there stands a very good chance of breaking the operating mechanism, or at least wearing it much faster.



Hence the handle shown. Gripping it only risks snapping it off, not ruining the expensive part of the mechanism. Force applied holding it in place actively resists the tendency of the apparatus to spin itself and not the drill bit. This allows one to force the bit to be the place of least resistance to movement without lessening the pressure "into" the bit's action (for instance, the force applied to the shoe). That means the bit can be kept from simply spinning without accomplishing much.



There would always be an ability to do that by lessening "inward" force, but the range of such available would much less and therefore the success much iffier, than by using the asked about handle. Using it allows a much greater operating range leading to the ability to have much more finesse in those situations.



Of courrse, most drilling done with it would not reach these points and one would only need use the handle now and then. Perhaps even ever depending on needs.



(By the way, perhaps see if it might simply be removable by design, or if a more careful removal might allow you to re-attach it when needed. Or if not "this-or-not-this-there-is-no-other", you might hack it off and use a power drill for the few times you would have made use of it. Also if value to another might be of interest someday, "in-tact" tickles more money out of people than "at-tacked"...)






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Roy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "603"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwoodworking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8514%2fwhat-is-the-purpose-of-the-side-handle-on-a-hand-eggbeater-drill%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9














    In my younger days, I had only this type of drill with which to bore holes. It was often necessary to place the in-line grip on my chest or belt to apply pressure. A board or similar panel provided some dispersal of force against the human body. The side handle served to stabilize the drill and to prevent rotation in an undesirable manner.



    Addendum: something popped into my alleged mind during the day. The drill I would have used might have had a shoe. This image shows this feature, making the determination that much easier. Image courtesy of Shutterstock:



    hand crank drill with shoe






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      That's a breast drill.

      – Mazura
      Apr 24 at 3:08











    • Yeah, your comments in the first paragraph still somewhat apply but a breast drill is a completely different animal to a standard hand drill and the side handle on a breast drill is mandatory, not a take-it-or-leave-it feature.

      – Graphus
      2 days ago















    9














    In my younger days, I had only this type of drill with which to bore holes. It was often necessary to place the in-line grip on my chest or belt to apply pressure. A board or similar panel provided some dispersal of force against the human body. The side handle served to stabilize the drill and to prevent rotation in an undesirable manner.



    Addendum: something popped into my alleged mind during the day. The drill I would have used might have had a shoe. This image shows this feature, making the determination that much easier. Image courtesy of Shutterstock:



    hand crank drill with shoe






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      That's a breast drill.

      – Mazura
      Apr 24 at 3:08











    • Yeah, your comments in the first paragraph still somewhat apply but a breast drill is a completely different animal to a standard hand drill and the side handle on a breast drill is mandatory, not a take-it-or-leave-it feature.

      – Graphus
      2 days ago













    9












    9








    9







    In my younger days, I had only this type of drill with which to bore holes. It was often necessary to place the in-line grip on my chest or belt to apply pressure. A board or similar panel provided some dispersal of force against the human body. The side handle served to stabilize the drill and to prevent rotation in an undesirable manner.



    Addendum: something popped into my alleged mind during the day. The drill I would have used might have had a shoe. This image shows this feature, making the determination that much easier. Image courtesy of Shutterstock:



    hand crank drill with shoe






    share|improve this answer















    In my younger days, I had only this type of drill with which to bore holes. It was often necessary to place the in-line grip on my chest or belt to apply pressure. A board or similar panel provided some dispersal of force against the human body. The side handle served to stabilize the drill and to prevent rotation in an undesirable manner.



    Addendum: something popped into my alleged mind during the day. The drill I would have used might have had a shoe. This image shows this feature, making the determination that much easier. Image courtesy of Shutterstock:



    hand crank drill with shoe







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 23 at 21:00

























    answered Apr 23 at 15:08









    fred_dot_ufred_dot_u

    1,208127




    1,208127







    • 1





      That's a breast drill.

      – Mazura
      Apr 24 at 3:08











    • Yeah, your comments in the first paragraph still somewhat apply but a breast drill is a completely different animal to a standard hand drill and the side handle on a breast drill is mandatory, not a take-it-or-leave-it feature.

      – Graphus
      2 days ago












    • 1





      That's a breast drill.

      – Mazura
      Apr 24 at 3:08











    • Yeah, your comments in the first paragraph still somewhat apply but a breast drill is a completely different animal to a standard hand drill and the side handle on a breast drill is mandatory, not a take-it-or-leave-it feature.

      – Graphus
      2 days ago







    1




    1





    That's a breast drill.

    – Mazura
    Apr 24 at 3:08





    That's a breast drill.

    – Mazura
    Apr 24 at 3:08













    Yeah, your comments in the first paragraph still somewhat apply but a breast drill is a completely different animal to a standard hand drill and the side handle on a breast drill is mandatory, not a take-it-or-leave-it feature.

    – Graphus
    2 days ago





    Yeah, your comments in the first paragraph still somewhat apply but a breast drill is a completely different animal to a standard hand drill and the side handle on a breast drill is mandatory, not a take-it-or-leave-it feature.

    – Graphus
    2 days ago











    3














    "A" reason is that a drill may not spin its bit nicely and freely once in a material. If the bit "catches" (does not spin nicely and freely), thee entire apparatus will then be the focus of the torque.



    Whichever of the two, the bit, or the entire-(not itself confronting the material's resistance like the bit does)-apparatus will tend to take the action of the torque and the not-the-bit components face only the resistance to movement that air provides, in addition to any resistance provided by any hold one has on the apparatus. In short:



    If the bit stops, the entire rest of it wants to begin moving, and more so as one tries harder to make the bit move.



    Unless one makes it harder for the apparatus to move, the bit will not begin moving and one is not really achieving the assumed goal.



    One's hold on the operating handle is part of that and any resistance pressing against the "shoe" (shown in fred_dot_u's picture), is helpful. However, the only direct action resisting the apparatus spinning so far is resistance through the operating handle and the torque and force one places there stands a very good chance of breaking the operating mechanism, or at least wearing it much faster.



    Hence the handle shown. Gripping it only risks snapping it off, not ruining the expensive part of the mechanism. Force applied holding it in place actively resists the tendency of the apparatus to spin itself and not the drill bit. This allows one to force the bit to be the place of least resistance to movement without lessening the pressure "into" the bit's action (for instance, the force applied to the shoe). That means the bit can be kept from simply spinning without accomplishing much.



    There would always be an ability to do that by lessening "inward" force, but the range of such available would much less and therefore the success much iffier, than by using the asked about handle. Using it allows a much greater operating range leading to the ability to have much more finesse in those situations.



    Of courrse, most drilling done with it would not reach these points and one would only need use the handle now and then. Perhaps even ever depending on needs.



    (By the way, perhaps see if it might simply be removable by design, or if a more careful removal might allow you to re-attach it when needed. Or if not "this-or-not-this-there-is-no-other", you might hack it off and use a power drill for the few times you would have made use of it. Also if value to another might be of interest someday, "in-tact" tickles more money out of people than "at-tacked"...)






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Roy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
























      3














      "A" reason is that a drill may not spin its bit nicely and freely once in a material. If the bit "catches" (does not spin nicely and freely), thee entire apparatus will then be the focus of the torque.



      Whichever of the two, the bit, or the entire-(not itself confronting the material's resistance like the bit does)-apparatus will tend to take the action of the torque and the not-the-bit components face only the resistance to movement that air provides, in addition to any resistance provided by any hold one has on the apparatus. In short:



      If the bit stops, the entire rest of it wants to begin moving, and more so as one tries harder to make the bit move.



      Unless one makes it harder for the apparatus to move, the bit will not begin moving and one is not really achieving the assumed goal.



      One's hold on the operating handle is part of that and any resistance pressing against the "shoe" (shown in fred_dot_u's picture), is helpful. However, the only direct action resisting the apparatus spinning so far is resistance through the operating handle and the torque and force one places there stands a very good chance of breaking the operating mechanism, or at least wearing it much faster.



      Hence the handle shown. Gripping it only risks snapping it off, not ruining the expensive part of the mechanism. Force applied holding it in place actively resists the tendency of the apparatus to spin itself and not the drill bit. This allows one to force the bit to be the place of least resistance to movement without lessening the pressure "into" the bit's action (for instance, the force applied to the shoe). That means the bit can be kept from simply spinning without accomplishing much.



      There would always be an ability to do that by lessening "inward" force, but the range of such available would much less and therefore the success much iffier, than by using the asked about handle. Using it allows a much greater operating range leading to the ability to have much more finesse in those situations.



      Of courrse, most drilling done with it would not reach these points and one would only need use the handle now and then. Perhaps even ever depending on needs.



      (By the way, perhaps see if it might simply be removable by design, or if a more careful removal might allow you to re-attach it when needed. Or if not "this-or-not-this-there-is-no-other", you might hack it off and use a power drill for the few times you would have made use of it. Also if value to another might be of interest someday, "in-tact" tickles more money out of people than "at-tacked"...)






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Roy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















        3












        3








        3







        "A" reason is that a drill may not spin its bit nicely and freely once in a material. If the bit "catches" (does not spin nicely and freely), thee entire apparatus will then be the focus of the torque.



        Whichever of the two, the bit, or the entire-(not itself confronting the material's resistance like the bit does)-apparatus will tend to take the action of the torque and the not-the-bit components face only the resistance to movement that air provides, in addition to any resistance provided by any hold one has on the apparatus. In short:



        If the bit stops, the entire rest of it wants to begin moving, and more so as one tries harder to make the bit move.



        Unless one makes it harder for the apparatus to move, the bit will not begin moving and one is not really achieving the assumed goal.



        One's hold on the operating handle is part of that and any resistance pressing against the "shoe" (shown in fred_dot_u's picture), is helpful. However, the only direct action resisting the apparatus spinning so far is resistance through the operating handle and the torque and force one places there stands a very good chance of breaking the operating mechanism, or at least wearing it much faster.



        Hence the handle shown. Gripping it only risks snapping it off, not ruining the expensive part of the mechanism. Force applied holding it in place actively resists the tendency of the apparatus to spin itself and not the drill bit. This allows one to force the bit to be the place of least resistance to movement without lessening the pressure "into" the bit's action (for instance, the force applied to the shoe). That means the bit can be kept from simply spinning without accomplishing much.



        There would always be an ability to do that by lessening "inward" force, but the range of such available would much less and therefore the success much iffier, than by using the asked about handle. Using it allows a much greater operating range leading to the ability to have much more finesse in those situations.



        Of courrse, most drilling done with it would not reach these points and one would only need use the handle now and then. Perhaps even ever depending on needs.



        (By the way, perhaps see if it might simply be removable by design, or if a more careful removal might allow you to re-attach it when needed. Or if not "this-or-not-this-there-is-no-other", you might hack it off and use a power drill for the few times you would have made use of it. Also if value to another might be of interest someday, "in-tact" tickles more money out of people than "at-tacked"...)






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Roy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.










        "A" reason is that a drill may not spin its bit nicely and freely once in a material. If the bit "catches" (does not spin nicely and freely), thee entire apparatus will then be the focus of the torque.



        Whichever of the two, the bit, or the entire-(not itself confronting the material's resistance like the bit does)-apparatus will tend to take the action of the torque and the not-the-bit components face only the resistance to movement that air provides, in addition to any resistance provided by any hold one has on the apparatus. In short:



        If the bit stops, the entire rest of it wants to begin moving, and more so as one tries harder to make the bit move.



        Unless one makes it harder for the apparatus to move, the bit will not begin moving and one is not really achieving the assumed goal.



        One's hold on the operating handle is part of that and any resistance pressing against the "shoe" (shown in fred_dot_u's picture), is helpful. However, the only direct action resisting the apparatus spinning so far is resistance through the operating handle and the torque and force one places there stands a very good chance of breaking the operating mechanism, or at least wearing it much faster.



        Hence the handle shown. Gripping it only risks snapping it off, not ruining the expensive part of the mechanism. Force applied holding it in place actively resists the tendency of the apparatus to spin itself and not the drill bit. This allows one to force the bit to be the place of least resistance to movement without lessening the pressure "into" the bit's action (for instance, the force applied to the shoe). That means the bit can be kept from simply spinning without accomplishing much.



        There would always be an ability to do that by lessening "inward" force, but the range of such available would much less and therefore the success much iffier, than by using the asked about handle. Using it allows a much greater operating range leading to the ability to have much more finesse in those situations.



        Of courrse, most drilling done with it would not reach these points and one would only need use the handle now and then. Perhaps even ever depending on needs.



        (By the way, perhaps see if it might simply be removable by design, or if a more careful removal might allow you to re-attach it when needed. Or if not "this-or-not-this-there-is-no-other", you might hack it off and use a power drill for the few times you would have made use of it. Also if value to another might be of interest someday, "in-tact" tickles more money out of people than "at-tacked"...)







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Roy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Roy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered Apr 24 at 0:10









        RoyRoy

        311




        311




        New contributor




        Roy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Roy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Roy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




















            SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            SpacemanSpiff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Woodworking Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwoodworking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8514%2fwhat-is-the-purpose-of-the-side-handle-on-a-hand-eggbeater-drill%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?