Dangerous workplace travelling [on hold]When are hugs acceptable in the workplace?Religion in the workplace…?How should I report someone who makes a potentially dangerous joke on the job?Being attacked by a client in my workplace - what are my rights?What can I do about fire and health hazards at my former workplace?Uncomfortable workplace temperatureHow to handle unwanted attention from “fans” in the workplace?How do I choose an effective pair of safety boots for my workplace?How to gain trust at workplace?How can you stop cutlery disappearing from the workplace?
Why were the rules for Proliferate changed?
In a series of books, what happens after the coming of age?
Which "exotic salt" can lower water's freezing point by 70 °C?
Extracting the parent, leaf, and extension from a valid path
TikZ/PGF draw algorithm
call() a function within its own context
Assuming a normal distribution: what is the sd for a given mean?
How to increase speed on my hybrid bike with flat handlebars and 700X35C tyres?
Why is the episode called "The Last of the Starks"?
A♭ major 9th chord in Bach is unexpectedly dissonant/jazzy
What does “two-bit (jerk)” mean?
No game no life what were the two siblings referencing in EP 5
Make me a minimum magic sum
Displaying an Estimated Execution Plan generates CXPACKET, PAGELATCH_SH, and LATCH_EX [ACCESS_METHODS_DATASET_PARENT] waits
Can a player choose to add detail and flavor to their character's spells and abilities?
What happens when the drag force exceeds the weight of an object falling into earth?
Explaining intravenous drug abuse to a small child
Is there a reason why Turkey took the Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, instead of Greece or another of the Balkan states?
What wise choice does Varys intends to make?
Justification of physical currency in an interstellar civilization?
Crime rates in a post-scarcity economy
Does restarting the SQL Services (on the machine) clear the server cache (for things like query plans and statistics)?
Why doesn't increasing the temperature of something like wood or paper set them on fire?
What detail can Hubble see on Mars?
Dangerous workplace travelling [on hold]
When are hugs acceptable in the workplace?Religion in the workplace…?How should I report someone who makes a potentially dangerous joke on the job?Being attacked by a client in my workplace - what are my rights?What can I do about fire and health hazards at my former workplace?Uncomfortable workplace temperatureHow to handle unwanted attention from “fans” in the workplace?How do I choose an effective pair of safety boots for my workplace?How to gain trust at workplace?How can you stop cutlery disappearing from the workplace?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I'm fairly new at my job, only had graduated last year and have been working since. I mostly do onsite repairs in vendor locations in the United States. During downtime, I'm basically in my home office.
During the downtime, I was assigned to visit a location for an allocated time of a week. I'm not sure how word got around the office, but a lot of people suddenly became worried about me. I was then pulled aside by a mix of some of the senior salesmen, technology, and including some random HR people. Basically I was told the place I was going to go to was known to be dangerous and to watch my back and never let anyone stand behind me. There was a lot more mentioned about how to be safe and I was given a few coupons to free tai-chi/karate lessons and some discounts at a shooting range.
I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states, but people are fairly serious about it. Are any of these warnings warranted, is this common in workplace travel?
For context, the location is Michigan.
work-environment united-states safety
New contributor
put on hold as too broad by gnat, mxyzplk, Monoandale, Rory Alsop, IDrinkandIKnowThings 15 hours ago
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 3 more comments
I'm fairly new at my job, only had graduated last year and have been working since. I mostly do onsite repairs in vendor locations in the United States. During downtime, I'm basically in my home office.
During the downtime, I was assigned to visit a location for an allocated time of a week. I'm not sure how word got around the office, but a lot of people suddenly became worried about me. I was then pulled aside by a mix of some of the senior salesmen, technology, and including some random HR people. Basically I was told the place I was going to go to was known to be dangerous and to watch my back and never let anyone stand behind me. There was a lot more mentioned about how to be safe and I was given a few coupons to free tai-chi/karate lessons and some discounts at a shooting range.
I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states, but people are fairly serious about it. Are any of these warnings warranted, is this common in workplace travel?
For context, the location is Michigan.
work-environment united-states safety
New contributor
put on hold as too broad by gnat, mxyzplk, Monoandale, Rory Alsop, IDrinkandIKnowThings 15 hours ago
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
7
Is it common to prank people in your office, especially "fairly new ones"? If so, I'd be suspect of the warnings. If not, I'd be a bit worried. Do some research of the crime around the actual street address you'll be working and staying at while there.
– Headblender
May 3 at 21:56
Who exactly gave you the coupons? The people who warned you about the place?
– Salman A
2 days ago
"I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states" There are still regions within the States that are quite dangerous, especially at night.
– Mast
yesterday
@Magisch There's no such city as "metropolitan michigan."
– Kyralessa
19 hours ago
@Kyralessa I meant by "metropolitan michigan" something like "a big city in michigan" because I wanted to respect the fact that OP apparently didn't directly mention Detroit, Michigan
– Magisch
19 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
I'm fairly new at my job, only had graduated last year and have been working since. I mostly do onsite repairs in vendor locations in the United States. During downtime, I'm basically in my home office.
During the downtime, I was assigned to visit a location for an allocated time of a week. I'm not sure how word got around the office, but a lot of people suddenly became worried about me. I was then pulled aside by a mix of some of the senior salesmen, technology, and including some random HR people. Basically I was told the place I was going to go to was known to be dangerous and to watch my back and never let anyone stand behind me. There was a lot more mentioned about how to be safe and I was given a few coupons to free tai-chi/karate lessons and some discounts at a shooting range.
I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states, but people are fairly serious about it. Are any of these warnings warranted, is this common in workplace travel?
For context, the location is Michigan.
work-environment united-states safety
New contributor
I'm fairly new at my job, only had graduated last year and have been working since. I mostly do onsite repairs in vendor locations in the United States. During downtime, I'm basically in my home office.
During the downtime, I was assigned to visit a location for an allocated time of a week. I'm not sure how word got around the office, but a lot of people suddenly became worried about me. I was then pulled aside by a mix of some of the senior salesmen, technology, and including some random HR people. Basically I was told the place I was going to go to was known to be dangerous and to watch my back and never let anyone stand behind me. There was a lot more mentioned about how to be safe and I was given a few coupons to free tai-chi/karate lessons and some discounts at a shooting range.
I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states, but people are fairly serious about it. Are any of these warnings warranted, is this common in workplace travel?
For context, the location is Michigan.
work-environment united-states safety
work-environment united-states safety
New contributor
New contributor
edited 8 hours ago
Joe Strazzere
258k1337541068
258k1337541068
New contributor
asked May 3 at 14:52
Paytun MaeningPaytun Maening
15823
15823
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as too broad by gnat, mxyzplk, Monoandale, Rory Alsop, IDrinkandIKnowThings 15 hours ago
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as too broad by gnat, mxyzplk, Monoandale, Rory Alsop, IDrinkandIKnowThings 15 hours ago
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
7
Is it common to prank people in your office, especially "fairly new ones"? If so, I'd be suspect of the warnings. If not, I'd be a bit worried. Do some research of the crime around the actual street address you'll be working and staying at while there.
– Headblender
May 3 at 21:56
Who exactly gave you the coupons? The people who warned you about the place?
– Salman A
2 days ago
"I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states" There are still regions within the States that are quite dangerous, especially at night.
– Mast
yesterday
@Magisch There's no such city as "metropolitan michigan."
– Kyralessa
19 hours ago
@Kyralessa I meant by "metropolitan michigan" something like "a big city in michigan" because I wanted to respect the fact that OP apparently didn't directly mention Detroit, Michigan
– Magisch
19 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
7
Is it common to prank people in your office, especially "fairly new ones"? If so, I'd be suspect of the warnings. If not, I'd be a bit worried. Do some research of the crime around the actual street address you'll be working and staying at while there.
– Headblender
May 3 at 21:56
Who exactly gave you the coupons? The people who warned you about the place?
– Salman A
2 days ago
"I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states" There are still regions within the States that are quite dangerous, especially at night.
– Mast
yesterday
@Magisch There's no such city as "metropolitan michigan."
– Kyralessa
19 hours ago
@Kyralessa I meant by "metropolitan michigan" something like "a big city in michigan" because I wanted to respect the fact that OP apparently didn't directly mention Detroit, Michigan
– Magisch
19 hours ago
7
7
Is it common to prank people in your office, especially "fairly new ones"? If so, I'd be suspect of the warnings. If not, I'd be a bit worried. Do some research of the crime around the actual street address you'll be working and staying at while there.
– Headblender
May 3 at 21:56
Is it common to prank people in your office, especially "fairly new ones"? If so, I'd be suspect of the warnings. If not, I'd be a bit worried. Do some research of the crime around the actual street address you'll be working and staying at while there.
– Headblender
May 3 at 21:56
Who exactly gave you the coupons? The people who warned you about the place?
– Salman A
2 days ago
Who exactly gave you the coupons? The people who warned you about the place?
– Salman A
2 days ago
"I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states" There are still regions within the States that are quite dangerous, especially at night.
– Mast
yesterday
"I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states" There are still regions within the States that are quite dangerous, especially at night.
– Mast
yesterday
@Magisch There's no such city as "metropolitan michigan."
– Kyralessa
19 hours ago
@Magisch There's no such city as "metropolitan michigan."
– Kyralessa
19 hours ago
@Kyralessa I meant by "metropolitan michigan" something like "a big city in michigan" because I wanted to respect the fact that OP apparently didn't directly mention Detroit, Michigan
– Magisch
19 hours ago
@Kyralessa I meant by "metropolitan michigan" something like "a big city in michigan" because I wanted to respect the fact that OP apparently didn't directly mention Detroit, Michigan
– Magisch
19 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
Do your own research first.
There are online maps that show crime statistics by neighborhood and location. (for example https://www.adt.com/crime , there are many others). Look at local news and police reports. If it's really as dangerous as they say, it should show up there. If not, it's a prank (which this does indeed sound like).
If it's really as dangerous as they say, you may have to make a decision. Contact HR officially in writing (and keep a copy), state your concerns including the result of your research and ask for behavioral guidelines and a written statement from them that explains why it's necessary for your role and the business to put you in personal danger.
HR hates written documents of this type since it creates a legal liability for them and can be used as strong evidence in court, should it come to that. Chances are, they rather don't sent you at all (and take a business hit, if need be) then writing a document about why the sent you in harm's way.
add a comment |
In since-deleted comments, OP specifies Michigan and alludes to a particular location. I am familiar with "dangerous Michigan locations".
First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population.
They "all" look like donuts economically, with depressed inner cities, but very robust suburbs.
People in those suburbs tend to repeat a prejudiced cliché: that the city is full of crime. They really believe it; many Suburbanites wouldn't be caught dead in them. And yes, there is a racial undertone to that cliché.
What's actually true is that the city is a madcap checkerboard of middle-class, affluent and desperately poor blocks, and this varies almost block by block. It's like 3 blocks of San Francisco, 4 blocks of Ann Arbor, 5 blocks of Flint, and 2 blocks of Love Canal.
What's also true is that the city has bottomed out and is recovering, including fixing a lot of corporate/structural problems like owning a money-losing utility that was still generating DC power for street lighting. Now, all the cool kids want to live there, at least the nicer parts of the checkerboard, and the words "gentrification" are starting to be spoken.
And so you have to scope out your destination literally block by block to determine the level of threat. Keep in mind if the business you are servicing is there, it may be in one of the good parts, at least by day.
You should also be mindful of hours/time-of-day; some places are safe only during normal business hours. 10am may be fine; 8pm not so much.
Now, as far as guns and Tai Chi, very large Michigan cities have gun control, so check with your gun lawyer and know your RoE. But far more important, guns are not an "I win" button! They require genuine skill and experience to use effectively, or at least, more effectively than the other guy. The same can be said of both Karate and Tai Chi.
And with Karate particularly, the problem is Karate is an external martial art, where force meets force, and force is emphasized - while it can help, it depends heavily on inflicting techniques on the other person, using strength to do it, and if he's much stronger, you have a problem. Tai Chi has real potential as an internal martial art, with all the right bits to be extremely effective in survival street fighting. It can make differences in strength irrelevant. However it is extremely difficult to find a teacher who teaches Tai Chi as a martial art. Doing the arm-waving Yoga dance without having experienced e.g. "wipe hands" as an effective way to pry off a stronger attacker's grip, is just mistraining yourself. You must understand and practice the martial aspects, on mats, tossing people all over the place, with falls (another thing to learn). This takes thousands of hours and cannot be done for a work assignment.
"First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population." as someone from Michigan, lol. Good one.
– David Brandtz
yesterday
By the way, my left-handed way of referring to "what could only be one city" is actually an ironic shout-out to the way Michigan law does the same thing. If Kalamazoo found a way to spike their population over 1 million, they'd qualify for hundreds of state programs intended for that other city!
– Harper
yesterday
@Harper I didn't downvote this, but honestly I dont think its a great answer either. It doesn't answer the general form of the OPs question at all really.
– David Grinberg
yesterday
add a comment |
I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states, but people are fairly serious about it. Are any of these warnings warrented, is this common in workplace travel?
The United States is no exception when it comes to crime. There are dangerous areas ( i.e. areas where more crimes occur ) in the US so the warnings may be warranted.
As with any travel, it is important to research the location you are traveling to so that you are best prepared for that specific environment. That being said, karate and shooting lessons won't prevent you from being victimized. Learn about the area and use caution and common sense and you should be fine.
If you feel the area you are being sent to is too risky, you can always decline the work trip but this may have negative consequences at work for you. But at the end of the day, your life is more important than your job.
add a comment |
My work can take me all over the world. For some areas I would get a personal security detail, for others the guidance is to absolutely not go, and for others there is guidance on avoiding pickpockets or certain areas of town.
Coming from a country that does not have guns, this can raise all sorts of concerns. Many cities in the US seem very dangerous to me in this respect.
Would I still go if required? Absolutely, but I would follow guidance from my risk and threat teams.
Is the guidance you are getting real or prank? We have no way to know. You need to ask them. Do your company HR pages have guidance on security and safety? Do they list out this location as high risk?
I would say if you're not actively involved in dealing drugs or any other kind of gang activity, US cities are safer than many parts of the media and gossip/rumor make them out to be. I've driven through the "bad parts" of many US cities, including the most notorious areas of L.A., DC, Baltimore, Oakland, and NYC, and the biggest thing I felt was shock at the obvious income disparities, not fear. Almost everyone are just people living their lives, just with a lot less money. I have known people to be assaulted and/or mugged, but never in the "bad" areas - actually in the more affluent ones.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
Seconded I used to work for a well known Arab company and they had set hazard rates for working in dangerous countries - Beirut (head office) was completely of limits btw.
– Neuromancer
yesterday
@Todd - I'm sure you are correct. But perception in countries that do not allow guns is pretty strong that the US is in that group of countries where death risk through being in the wrong place at the wrong time is much higher than most. I know - muggings can occur anywhere, but corporate risk management is pretty precise about per district/city/country warnings.
– Rory Alsop
16 hours ago
add a comment |
This is completely ridiculous. You'll be going to a place of business, presumably during the day, and I assume you'll have a rental car - there is nothing to fear.
Make sure you have the address you'll be going, and have directions. Don't leave anything in the car, or if you do, put it in the trunk. Make sure you lock the car.
Sure, there are areas where I wouldn't go walking after dark, but this is not that. I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities.
1
Good answer re "I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities." It's not possible to fully understand how people perceive the dangerousness of US cities without considering the racial, ethnic, and class stereotypes that go along with this.
– aem
2 days ago
add a comment |
There are tons of sites you can look up online to determine if a metro area is crime heavy. Some sections are and some sections are not. The number of violent crimes per year along your service route are what you should consider.
If you want to risk your life for cash; that's your prerogative, but I wouldn't advise it. Simply because you and your coworkers don't have the right perspective for dealing with criminals.
In a violent crime scenario where you are the target, your Gun or Ju Jitsu training are not effective. Criminals will always put you in a scenario in which you will be unable to defend yourself. They are more aware than anyone that a citizen may be armed, and criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force.
3
criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force. - A source backing up this claim would greatly improve this answer.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
May 3 at 17:26
@IDrinkandIKnowThings police and citizens are constrained by the law in the use of deadly force. Criminals have no such restrictions, and in violent crimes involving a firearm at the very least use the threat of deadly force to coarse citizens. This isn't even a gun control debate, it's simply true.
– persona-non-grata
May 3 at 17:45
6
The OP is busy dancing around not saying it's Detroit. Detroit is huge, and the metropolitan area is even bigger (it's comparable in size to Luxembourg). Metropolitan crime rate is useless to the OP; they'll need a considerably finer-grained map.
– Mark
May 3 at 20:42
@Mark: which are easily available online. No problem
– Hilmar
2 days ago
2
@persona-non-grata Violent criminals are obviously prepared to use violence, but I would be careful extrapolating that to all criminals. Just because someone is used to breaking laws does not mean that they are necessarily a violent person.
– forest
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
Suburban US people believing downtown areas are inherently dangerous is a common thing. But take it with a grain of salt.
Before you take these well-intentioned warnings too seriously, follow up with the people warning you asking for facts. Ask them, "what part of the city are you talking about?" or "who do you know who was attacked, and how did they deal with it?" The people with real knowledge can then give you helpful information. Others may mumble and say "friend of a friend." They will have less useful information. Some of it may be pure BS.
You should, of course, keep an eye on your surroundings in any place where you are a newcomer. If the place you visit suffers from extreme poverty, dress and conduct yourself so you don't stand out too much. Leave your fancy wristwatch and custom-tailored suit at home. You're there to do your job, that's all.
If homeless people are around, it can't hurt to buy a couple of extra coffees and donuts and offer them to people on the street when you take a break. Any sort of personal contact -- anything that shows you're human -- helps you fit in.
Some kinds of workers take serious, ongoing, training in how to use weapons or hand-to-hand combat to defend themselves. If you are a police officer or soldier, you know about this. If you're not, don't try this anywhere you're a newcomer.
I grew up in, have lived and worked in an inner city my entire life. I have absolutely never seen someone fit in by giving a homeless person a donut.
– bruglesco
5 hours ago
add a comment |
That you might have to go someplace dangerous for your job isn't entirely unheard of though whether it's common depends on what you do and where your customers are. They could also be overreacting, especially if they're making assumptions about your ability to stay safe based on your size, gender, visible disability, etc.
There was a lot more mentioned about how to be safe and I was given a few coupons to free tai-chi/karate lessons and some discounts at a shooting range.
This part isn't normal when coming from "some random HR people". It's one thing to get random safety tips or even bad advice from someone who's just trying to be helpful but it's odd that people in HR would suggest a minimal amount of karate or gun practice with half a moment's notice given their position of protecting the company.
If your company is going to send people to work in dangerous areas, it should be taking official steps to keep their employees safe:
Official safety training that includes how to stay safe in dangerous areas, situational awareness, and risk assessment.
Sending employees to high risk areas in pairs and/or provide security.
add a comment |
Presumably, you get to turn in travel expenses for this trip. Hire two body guards for the day and turn the cost into your boss. Then we'll see how funny your new friends think they are.
add a comment |
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Do your own research first.
There are online maps that show crime statistics by neighborhood and location. (for example https://www.adt.com/crime , there are many others). Look at local news and police reports. If it's really as dangerous as they say, it should show up there. If not, it's a prank (which this does indeed sound like).
If it's really as dangerous as they say, you may have to make a decision. Contact HR officially in writing (and keep a copy), state your concerns including the result of your research and ask for behavioral guidelines and a written statement from them that explains why it's necessary for your role and the business to put you in personal danger.
HR hates written documents of this type since it creates a legal liability for them and can be used as strong evidence in court, should it come to that. Chances are, they rather don't sent you at all (and take a business hit, if need be) then writing a document about why the sent you in harm's way.
add a comment |
Do your own research first.
There are online maps that show crime statistics by neighborhood and location. (for example https://www.adt.com/crime , there are many others). Look at local news and police reports. If it's really as dangerous as they say, it should show up there. If not, it's a prank (which this does indeed sound like).
If it's really as dangerous as they say, you may have to make a decision. Contact HR officially in writing (and keep a copy), state your concerns including the result of your research and ask for behavioral guidelines and a written statement from them that explains why it's necessary for your role and the business to put you in personal danger.
HR hates written documents of this type since it creates a legal liability for them and can be used as strong evidence in court, should it come to that. Chances are, they rather don't sent you at all (and take a business hit, if need be) then writing a document about why the sent you in harm's way.
add a comment |
Do your own research first.
There are online maps that show crime statistics by neighborhood and location. (for example https://www.adt.com/crime , there are many others). Look at local news and police reports. If it's really as dangerous as they say, it should show up there. If not, it's a prank (which this does indeed sound like).
If it's really as dangerous as they say, you may have to make a decision. Contact HR officially in writing (and keep a copy), state your concerns including the result of your research and ask for behavioral guidelines and a written statement from them that explains why it's necessary for your role and the business to put you in personal danger.
HR hates written documents of this type since it creates a legal liability for them and can be used as strong evidence in court, should it come to that. Chances are, they rather don't sent you at all (and take a business hit, if need be) then writing a document about why the sent you in harm's way.
Do your own research first.
There are online maps that show crime statistics by neighborhood and location. (for example https://www.adt.com/crime , there are many others). Look at local news and police reports. If it's really as dangerous as they say, it should show up there. If not, it's a prank (which this does indeed sound like).
If it's really as dangerous as they say, you may have to make a decision. Contact HR officially in writing (and keep a copy), state your concerns including the result of your research and ask for behavioral guidelines and a written statement from them that explains why it's necessary for your role and the business to put you in personal danger.
HR hates written documents of this type since it creates a legal liability for them and can be used as strong evidence in court, should it come to that. Chances are, they rather don't sent you at all (and take a business hit, if need be) then writing a document about why the sent you in harm's way.
answered May 3 at 15:43
HilmarHilmar
32.9k97395
32.9k97395
add a comment |
add a comment |
In since-deleted comments, OP specifies Michigan and alludes to a particular location. I am familiar with "dangerous Michigan locations".
First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population.
They "all" look like donuts economically, with depressed inner cities, but very robust suburbs.
People in those suburbs tend to repeat a prejudiced cliché: that the city is full of crime. They really believe it; many Suburbanites wouldn't be caught dead in them. And yes, there is a racial undertone to that cliché.
What's actually true is that the city is a madcap checkerboard of middle-class, affluent and desperately poor blocks, and this varies almost block by block. It's like 3 blocks of San Francisco, 4 blocks of Ann Arbor, 5 blocks of Flint, and 2 blocks of Love Canal.
What's also true is that the city has bottomed out and is recovering, including fixing a lot of corporate/structural problems like owning a money-losing utility that was still generating DC power for street lighting. Now, all the cool kids want to live there, at least the nicer parts of the checkerboard, and the words "gentrification" are starting to be spoken.
And so you have to scope out your destination literally block by block to determine the level of threat. Keep in mind if the business you are servicing is there, it may be in one of the good parts, at least by day.
You should also be mindful of hours/time-of-day; some places are safe only during normal business hours. 10am may be fine; 8pm not so much.
Now, as far as guns and Tai Chi, very large Michigan cities have gun control, so check with your gun lawyer and know your RoE. But far more important, guns are not an "I win" button! They require genuine skill and experience to use effectively, or at least, more effectively than the other guy. The same can be said of both Karate and Tai Chi.
And with Karate particularly, the problem is Karate is an external martial art, where force meets force, and force is emphasized - while it can help, it depends heavily on inflicting techniques on the other person, using strength to do it, and if he's much stronger, you have a problem. Tai Chi has real potential as an internal martial art, with all the right bits to be extremely effective in survival street fighting. It can make differences in strength irrelevant. However it is extremely difficult to find a teacher who teaches Tai Chi as a martial art. Doing the arm-waving Yoga dance without having experienced e.g. "wipe hands" as an effective way to pry off a stronger attacker's grip, is just mistraining yourself. You must understand and practice the martial aspects, on mats, tossing people all over the place, with falls (another thing to learn). This takes thousands of hours and cannot be done for a work assignment.
"First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population." as someone from Michigan, lol. Good one.
– David Brandtz
yesterday
By the way, my left-handed way of referring to "what could only be one city" is actually an ironic shout-out to the way Michigan law does the same thing. If Kalamazoo found a way to spike their population over 1 million, they'd qualify for hundreds of state programs intended for that other city!
– Harper
yesterday
@Harper I didn't downvote this, but honestly I dont think its a great answer either. It doesn't answer the general form of the OPs question at all really.
– David Grinberg
yesterday
add a comment |
In since-deleted comments, OP specifies Michigan and alludes to a particular location. I am familiar with "dangerous Michigan locations".
First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population.
They "all" look like donuts economically, with depressed inner cities, but very robust suburbs.
People in those suburbs tend to repeat a prejudiced cliché: that the city is full of crime. They really believe it; many Suburbanites wouldn't be caught dead in them. And yes, there is a racial undertone to that cliché.
What's actually true is that the city is a madcap checkerboard of middle-class, affluent and desperately poor blocks, and this varies almost block by block. It's like 3 blocks of San Francisco, 4 blocks of Ann Arbor, 5 blocks of Flint, and 2 blocks of Love Canal.
What's also true is that the city has bottomed out and is recovering, including fixing a lot of corporate/structural problems like owning a money-losing utility that was still generating DC power for street lighting. Now, all the cool kids want to live there, at least the nicer parts of the checkerboard, and the words "gentrification" are starting to be spoken.
And so you have to scope out your destination literally block by block to determine the level of threat. Keep in mind if the business you are servicing is there, it may be in one of the good parts, at least by day.
You should also be mindful of hours/time-of-day; some places are safe only during normal business hours. 10am may be fine; 8pm not so much.
Now, as far as guns and Tai Chi, very large Michigan cities have gun control, so check with your gun lawyer and know your RoE. But far more important, guns are not an "I win" button! They require genuine skill and experience to use effectively, or at least, more effectively than the other guy. The same can be said of both Karate and Tai Chi.
And with Karate particularly, the problem is Karate is an external martial art, where force meets force, and force is emphasized - while it can help, it depends heavily on inflicting techniques on the other person, using strength to do it, and if he's much stronger, you have a problem. Tai Chi has real potential as an internal martial art, with all the right bits to be extremely effective in survival street fighting. It can make differences in strength irrelevant. However it is extremely difficult to find a teacher who teaches Tai Chi as a martial art. Doing the arm-waving Yoga dance without having experienced e.g. "wipe hands" as an effective way to pry off a stronger attacker's grip, is just mistraining yourself. You must understand and practice the martial aspects, on mats, tossing people all over the place, with falls (another thing to learn). This takes thousands of hours and cannot be done for a work assignment.
"First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population." as someone from Michigan, lol. Good one.
– David Brandtz
yesterday
By the way, my left-handed way of referring to "what could only be one city" is actually an ironic shout-out to the way Michigan law does the same thing. If Kalamazoo found a way to spike their population over 1 million, they'd qualify for hundreds of state programs intended for that other city!
– Harper
yesterday
@Harper I didn't downvote this, but honestly I dont think its a great answer either. It doesn't answer the general form of the OPs question at all really.
– David Grinberg
yesterday
add a comment |
In since-deleted comments, OP specifies Michigan and alludes to a particular location. I am familiar with "dangerous Michigan locations".
First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population.
They "all" look like donuts economically, with depressed inner cities, but very robust suburbs.
People in those suburbs tend to repeat a prejudiced cliché: that the city is full of crime. They really believe it; many Suburbanites wouldn't be caught dead in them. And yes, there is a racial undertone to that cliché.
What's actually true is that the city is a madcap checkerboard of middle-class, affluent and desperately poor blocks, and this varies almost block by block. It's like 3 blocks of San Francisco, 4 blocks of Ann Arbor, 5 blocks of Flint, and 2 blocks of Love Canal.
What's also true is that the city has bottomed out and is recovering, including fixing a lot of corporate/structural problems like owning a money-losing utility that was still generating DC power for street lighting. Now, all the cool kids want to live there, at least the nicer parts of the checkerboard, and the words "gentrification" are starting to be spoken.
And so you have to scope out your destination literally block by block to determine the level of threat. Keep in mind if the business you are servicing is there, it may be in one of the good parts, at least by day.
You should also be mindful of hours/time-of-day; some places are safe only during normal business hours. 10am may be fine; 8pm not so much.
Now, as far as guns and Tai Chi, very large Michigan cities have gun control, so check with your gun lawyer and know your RoE. But far more important, guns are not an "I win" button! They require genuine skill and experience to use effectively, or at least, more effectively than the other guy. The same can be said of both Karate and Tai Chi.
And with Karate particularly, the problem is Karate is an external martial art, where force meets force, and force is emphasized - while it can help, it depends heavily on inflicting techniques on the other person, using strength to do it, and if he's much stronger, you have a problem. Tai Chi has real potential as an internal martial art, with all the right bits to be extremely effective in survival street fighting. It can make differences in strength irrelevant. However it is extremely difficult to find a teacher who teaches Tai Chi as a martial art. Doing the arm-waving Yoga dance without having experienced e.g. "wipe hands" as an effective way to pry off a stronger attacker's grip, is just mistraining yourself. You must understand and practice the martial aspects, on mats, tossing people all over the place, with falls (another thing to learn). This takes thousands of hours and cannot be done for a work assignment.
In since-deleted comments, OP specifies Michigan and alludes to a particular location. I am familiar with "dangerous Michigan locations".
First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population.
They "all" look like donuts economically, with depressed inner cities, but very robust suburbs.
People in those suburbs tend to repeat a prejudiced cliché: that the city is full of crime. They really believe it; many Suburbanites wouldn't be caught dead in them. And yes, there is a racial undertone to that cliché.
What's actually true is that the city is a madcap checkerboard of middle-class, affluent and desperately poor blocks, and this varies almost block by block. It's like 3 blocks of San Francisco, 4 blocks of Ann Arbor, 5 blocks of Flint, and 2 blocks of Love Canal.
What's also true is that the city has bottomed out and is recovering, including fixing a lot of corporate/structural problems like owning a money-losing utility that was still generating DC power for street lighting. Now, all the cool kids want to live there, at least the nicer parts of the checkerboard, and the words "gentrification" are starting to be spoken.
And so you have to scope out your destination literally block by block to determine the level of threat. Keep in mind if the business you are servicing is there, it may be in one of the good parts, at least by day.
You should also be mindful of hours/time-of-day; some places are safe only during normal business hours. 10am may be fine; 8pm not so much.
Now, as far as guns and Tai Chi, very large Michigan cities have gun control, so check with your gun lawyer and know your RoE. But far more important, guns are not an "I win" button! They require genuine skill and experience to use effectively, or at least, more effectively than the other guy. The same can be said of both Karate and Tai Chi.
And with Karate particularly, the problem is Karate is an external martial art, where force meets force, and force is emphasized - while it can help, it depends heavily on inflicting techniques on the other person, using strength to do it, and if he's much stronger, you have a problem. Tai Chi has real potential as an internal martial art, with all the right bits to be extremely effective in survival street fighting. It can make differences in strength irrelevant. However it is extremely difficult to find a teacher who teaches Tai Chi as a martial art. Doing the arm-waving Yoga dance without having experienced e.g. "wipe hands" as an effective way to pry off a stronger attacker's grip, is just mistraining yourself. You must understand and practice the martial aspects, on mats, tossing people all over the place, with falls (another thing to learn). This takes thousands of hours and cannot be done for a work assignment.
edited yesterday
answered May 4 at 0:03
HarperHarper
5,83811027
5,83811027
"First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population." as someone from Michigan, lol. Good one.
– David Brandtz
yesterday
By the way, my left-handed way of referring to "what could only be one city" is actually an ironic shout-out to the way Michigan law does the same thing. If Kalamazoo found a way to spike their population over 1 million, they'd qualify for hundreds of state programs intended for that other city!
– Harper
yesterday
@Harper I didn't downvote this, but honestly I dont think its a great answer either. It doesn't answer the general form of the OPs question at all really.
– David Grinberg
yesterday
add a comment |
"First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population." as someone from Michigan, lol. Good one.
– David Brandtz
yesterday
By the way, my left-handed way of referring to "what could only be one city" is actually an ironic shout-out to the way Michigan law does the same thing. If Kalamazoo found a way to spike their population over 1 million, they'd qualify for hundreds of state programs intended for that other city!
– Harper
yesterday
@Harper I didn't downvote this, but honestly I dont think its a great answer either. It doesn't answer the general form of the OPs question at all really.
– David Grinberg
yesterday
"First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population." as someone from Michigan, lol. Good one.
– David Brandtz
yesterday
"First, I'm going to make a broad, inclusive statement about all Michigan cities with 600,000 or more population." as someone from Michigan, lol. Good one.
– David Brandtz
yesterday
By the way, my left-handed way of referring to "what could only be one city" is actually an ironic shout-out to the way Michigan law does the same thing. If Kalamazoo found a way to spike their population over 1 million, they'd qualify for hundreds of state programs intended for that other city!
– Harper
yesterday
By the way, my left-handed way of referring to "what could only be one city" is actually an ironic shout-out to the way Michigan law does the same thing. If Kalamazoo found a way to spike their population over 1 million, they'd qualify for hundreds of state programs intended for that other city!
– Harper
yesterday
@Harper I didn't downvote this, but honestly I dont think its a great answer either. It doesn't answer the general form of the OPs question at all really.
– David Grinberg
yesterday
@Harper I didn't downvote this, but honestly I dont think its a great answer either. It doesn't answer the general form of the OPs question at all really.
– David Grinberg
yesterday
add a comment |
I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states, but people are fairly serious about it. Are any of these warnings warrented, is this common in workplace travel?
The United States is no exception when it comes to crime. There are dangerous areas ( i.e. areas where more crimes occur ) in the US so the warnings may be warranted.
As with any travel, it is important to research the location you are traveling to so that you are best prepared for that specific environment. That being said, karate and shooting lessons won't prevent you from being victimized. Learn about the area and use caution and common sense and you should be fine.
If you feel the area you are being sent to is too risky, you can always decline the work trip but this may have negative consequences at work for you. But at the end of the day, your life is more important than your job.
add a comment |
I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states, but people are fairly serious about it. Are any of these warnings warrented, is this common in workplace travel?
The United States is no exception when it comes to crime. There are dangerous areas ( i.e. areas where more crimes occur ) in the US so the warnings may be warranted.
As with any travel, it is important to research the location you are traveling to so that you are best prepared for that specific environment. That being said, karate and shooting lessons won't prevent you from being victimized. Learn about the area and use caution and common sense and you should be fine.
If you feel the area you are being sent to is too risky, you can always decline the work trip but this may have negative consequences at work for you. But at the end of the day, your life is more important than your job.
add a comment |
I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states, but people are fairly serious about it. Are any of these warnings warrented, is this common in workplace travel?
The United States is no exception when it comes to crime. There are dangerous areas ( i.e. areas where more crimes occur ) in the US so the warnings may be warranted.
As with any travel, it is important to research the location you are traveling to so that you are best prepared for that specific environment. That being said, karate and shooting lessons won't prevent you from being victimized. Learn about the area and use caution and common sense and you should be fine.
If you feel the area you are being sent to is too risky, you can always decline the work trip but this may have negative consequences at work for you. But at the end of the day, your life is more important than your job.
I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states, but people are fairly serious about it. Are any of these warnings warrented, is this common in workplace travel?
The United States is no exception when it comes to crime. There are dangerous areas ( i.e. areas where more crimes occur ) in the US so the warnings may be warranted.
As with any travel, it is important to research the location you are traveling to so that you are best prepared for that specific environment. That being said, karate and shooting lessons won't prevent you from being victimized. Learn about the area and use caution and common sense and you should be fine.
If you feel the area you are being sent to is too risky, you can always decline the work trip but this may have negative consequences at work for you. But at the end of the day, your life is more important than your job.
edited May 3 at 15:19
answered May 3 at 15:09
sf02sf02
12.4k72447
12.4k72447
add a comment |
add a comment |
My work can take me all over the world. For some areas I would get a personal security detail, for others the guidance is to absolutely not go, and for others there is guidance on avoiding pickpockets or certain areas of town.
Coming from a country that does not have guns, this can raise all sorts of concerns. Many cities in the US seem very dangerous to me in this respect.
Would I still go if required? Absolutely, but I would follow guidance from my risk and threat teams.
Is the guidance you are getting real or prank? We have no way to know. You need to ask them. Do your company HR pages have guidance on security and safety? Do they list out this location as high risk?
I would say if you're not actively involved in dealing drugs or any other kind of gang activity, US cities are safer than many parts of the media and gossip/rumor make them out to be. I've driven through the "bad parts" of many US cities, including the most notorious areas of L.A., DC, Baltimore, Oakland, and NYC, and the biggest thing I felt was shock at the obvious income disparities, not fear. Almost everyone are just people living their lives, just with a lot less money. I have known people to be assaulted and/or mugged, but never in the "bad" areas - actually in the more affluent ones.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
Seconded I used to work for a well known Arab company and they had set hazard rates for working in dangerous countries - Beirut (head office) was completely of limits btw.
– Neuromancer
yesterday
@Todd - I'm sure you are correct. But perception in countries that do not allow guns is pretty strong that the US is in that group of countries where death risk through being in the wrong place at the wrong time is much higher than most. I know - muggings can occur anywhere, but corporate risk management is pretty precise about per district/city/country warnings.
– Rory Alsop
16 hours ago
add a comment |
My work can take me all over the world. For some areas I would get a personal security detail, for others the guidance is to absolutely not go, and for others there is guidance on avoiding pickpockets or certain areas of town.
Coming from a country that does not have guns, this can raise all sorts of concerns. Many cities in the US seem very dangerous to me in this respect.
Would I still go if required? Absolutely, but I would follow guidance from my risk and threat teams.
Is the guidance you are getting real or prank? We have no way to know. You need to ask them. Do your company HR pages have guidance on security and safety? Do they list out this location as high risk?
I would say if you're not actively involved in dealing drugs or any other kind of gang activity, US cities are safer than many parts of the media and gossip/rumor make them out to be. I've driven through the "bad parts" of many US cities, including the most notorious areas of L.A., DC, Baltimore, Oakland, and NYC, and the biggest thing I felt was shock at the obvious income disparities, not fear. Almost everyone are just people living their lives, just with a lot less money. I have known people to be assaulted and/or mugged, but never in the "bad" areas - actually in the more affluent ones.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
Seconded I used to work for a well known Arab company and they had set hazard rates for working in dangerous countries - Beirut (head office) was completely of limits btw.
– Neuromancer
yesterday
@Todd - I'm sure you are correct. But perception in countries that do not allow guns is pretty strong that the US is in that group of countries where death risk through being in the wrong place at the wrong time is much higher than most. I know - muggings can occur anywhere, but corporate risk management is pretty precise about per district/city/country warnings.
– Rory Alsop
16 hours ago
add a comment |
My work can take me all over the world. For some areas I would get a personal security detail, for others the guidance is to absolutely not go, and for others there is guidance on avoiding pickpockets or certain areas of town.
Coming from a country that does not have guns, this can raise all sorts of concerns. Many cities in the US seem very dangerous to me in this respect.
Would I still go if required? Absolutely, but I would follow guidance from my risk and threat teams.
Is the guidance you are getting real or prank? We have no way to know. You need to ask them. Do your company HR pages have guidance on security and safety? Do they list out this location as high risk?
My work can take me all over the world. For some areas I would get a personal security detail, for others the guidance is to absolutely not go, and for others there is guidance on avoiding pickpockets or certain areas of town.
Coming from a country that does not have guns, this can raise all sorts of concerns. Many cities in the US seem very dangerous to me in this respect.
Would I still go if required? Absolutely, but I would follow guidance from my risk and threat teams.
Is the guidance you are getting real or prank? We have no way to know. You need to ask them. Do your company HR pages have guidance on security and safety? Do they list out this location as high risk?
answered May 3 at 15:30
Rory AlsopRory Alsop
5,92712744
5,92712744
I would say if you're not actively involved in dealing drugs or any other kind of gang activity, US cities are safer than many parts of the media and gossip/rumor make them out to be. I've driven through the "bad parts" of many US cities, including the most notorious areas of L.A., DC, Baltimore, Oakland, and NYC, and the biggest thing I felt was shock at the obvious income disparities, not fear. Almost everyone are just people living their lives, just with a lot less money. I have known people to be assaulted and/or mugged, but never in the "bad" areas - actually in the more affluent ones.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
Seconded I used to work for a well known Arab company and they had set hazard rates for working in dangerous countries - Beirut (head office) was completely of limits btw.
– Neuromancer
yesterday
@Todd - I'm sure you are correct. But perception in countries that do not allow guns is pretty strong that the US is in that group of countries where death risk through being in the wrong place at the wrong time is much higher than most. I know - muggings can occur anywhere, but corporate risk management is pretty precise about per district/city/country warnings.
– Rory Alsop
16 hours ago
add a comment |
I would say if you're not actively involved in dealing drugs or any other kind of gang activity, US cities are safer than many parts of the media and gossip/rumor make them out to be. I've driven through the "bad parts" of many US cities, including the most notorious areas of L.A., DC, Baltimore, Oakland, and NYC, and the biggest thing I felt was shock at the obvious income disparities, not fear. Almost everyone are just people living their lives, just with a lot less money. I have known people to be assaulted and/or mugged, but never in the "bad" areas - actually in the more affluent ones.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
Seconded I used to work for a well known Arab company and they had set hazard rates for working in dangerous countries - Beirut (head office) was completely of limits btw.
– Neuromancer
yesterday
@Todd - I'm sure you are correct. But perception in countries that do not allow guns is pretty strong that the US is in that group of countries where death risk through being in the wrong place at the wrong time is much higher than most. I know - muggings can occur anywhere, but corporate risk management is pretty precise about per district/city/country warnings.
– Rory Alsop
16 hours ago
I would say if you're not actively involved in dealing drugs or any other kind of gang activity, US cities are safer than many parts of the media and gossip/rumor make them out to be. I've driven through the "bad parts" of many US cities, including the most notorious areas of L.A., DC, Baltimore, Oakland, and NYC, and the biggest thing I felt was shock at the obvious income disparities, not fear. Almost everyone are just people living their lives, just with a lot less money. I have known people to be assaulted and/or mugged, but never in the "bad" areas - actually in the more affluent ones.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
I would say if you're not actively involved in dealing drugs or any other kind of gang activity, US cities are safer than many parts of the media and gossip/rumor make them out to be. I've driven through the "bad parts" of many US cities, including the most notorious areas of L.A., DC, Baltimore, Oakland, and NYC, and the biggest thing I felt was shock at the obvious income disparities, not fear. Almost everyone are just people living their lives, just with a lot less money. I have known people to be assaulted and/or mugged, but never in the "bad" areas - actually in the more affluent ones.
– Todd Wilcox
yesterday
Seconded I used to work for a well known Arab company and they had set hazard rates for working in dangerous countries - Beirut (head office) was completely of limits btw.
– Neuromancer
yesterday
Seconded I used to work for a well known Arab company and they had set hazard rates for working in dangerous countries - Beirut (head office) was completely of limits btw.
– Neuromancer
yesterday
@Todd - I'm sure you are correct. But perception in countries that do not allow guns is pretty strong that the US is in that group of countries where death risk through being in the wrong place at the wrong time is much higher than most. I know - muggings can occur anywhere, but corporate risk management is pretty precise about per district/city/country warnings.
– Rory Alsop
16 hours ago
@Todd - I'm sure you are correct. But perception in countries that do not allow guns is pretty strong that the US is in that group of countries where death risk through being in the wrong place at the wrong time is much higher than most. I know - muggings can occur anywhere, but corporate risk management is pretty precise about per district/city/country warnings.
– Rory Alsop
16 hours ago
add a comment |
This is completely ridiculous. You'll be going to a place of business, presumably during the day, and I assume you'll have a rental car - there is nothing to fear.
Make sure you have the address you'll be going, and have directions. Don't leave anything in the car, or if you do, put it in the trunk. Make sure you lock the car.
Sure, there are areas where I wouldn't go walking after dark, but this is not that. I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities.
1
Good answer re "I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities." It's not possible to fully understand how people perceive the dangerousness of US cities without considering the racial, ethnic, and class stereotypes that go along with this.
– aem
2 days ago
add a comment |
This is completely ridiculous. You'll be going to a place of business, presumably during the day, and I assume you'll have a rental car - there is nothing to fear.
Make sure you have the address you'll be going, and have directions. Don't leave anything in the car, or if you do, put it in the trunk. Make sure you lock the car.
Sure, there are areas where I wouldn't go walking after dark, but this is not that. I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities.
1
Good answer re "I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities." It's not possible to fully understand how people perceive the dangerousness of US cities without considering the racial, ethnic, and class stereotypes that go along with this.
– aem
2 days ago
add a comment |
This is completely ridiculous. You'll be going to a place of business, presumably during the day, and I assume you'll have a rental car - there is nothing to fear.
Make sure you have the address you'll be going, and have directions. Don't leave anything in the car, or if you do, put it in the trunk. Make sure you lock the car.
Sure, there are areas where I wouldn't go walking after dark, but this is not that. I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities.
This is completely ridiculous. You'll be going to a place of business, presumably during the day, and I assume you'll have a rental car - there is nothing to fear.
Make sure you have the address you'll be going, and have directions. Don't leave anything in the car, or if you do, put it in the trunk. Make sure you lock the car.
Sure, there are areas where I wouldn't go walking after dark, but this is not that. I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities.
answered May 4 at 4:37
ventsyvventsyv
1,399413
1,399413
1
Good answer re "I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities." It's not possible to fully understand how people perceive the dangerousness of US cities without considering the racial, ethnic, and class stereotypes that go along with this.
– aem
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Good answer re "I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities." It's not possible to fully understand how people perceive the dangerousness of US cities without considering the racial, ethnic, and class stereotypes that go along with this.
– aem
2 days ago
1
1
Good answer re "I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities." It's not possible to fully understand how people perceive the dangerousness of US cities without considering the racial, ethnic, and class stereotypes that go along with this.
– aem
2 days ago
Good answer re "I suspect most of what you hear is due to prejudice and stereotypes that many people in the suburbs have towards the inner cities." It's not possible to fully understand how people perceive the dangerousness of US cities without considering the racial, ethnic, and class stereotypes that go along with this.
– aem
2 days ago
add a comment |
There are tons of sites you can look up online to determine if a metro area is crime heavy. Some sections are and some sections are not. The number of violent crimes per year along your service route are what you should consider.
If you want to risk your life for cash; that's your prerogative, but I wouldn't advise it. Simply because you and your coworkers don't have the right perspective for dealing with criminals.
In a violent crime scenario where you are the target, your Gun or Ju Jitsu training are not effective. Criminals will always put you in a scenario in which you will be unable to defend yourself. They are more aware than anyone that a citizen may be armed, and criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force.
3
criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force. - A source backing up this claim would greatly improve this answer.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
May 3 at 17:26
@IDrinkandIKnowThings police and citizens are constrained by the law in the use of deadly force. Criminals have no such restrictions, and in violent crimes involving a firearm at the very least use the threat of deadly force to coarse citizens. This isn't even a gun control debate, it's simply true.
– persona-non-grata
May 3 at 17:45
6
The OP is busy dancing around not saying it's Detroit. Detroit is huge, and the metropolitan area is even bigger (it's comparable in size to Luxembourg). Metropolitan crime rate is useless to the OP; they'll need a considerably finer-grained map.
– Mark
May 3 at 20:42
@Mark: which are easily available online. No problem
– Hilmar
2 days ago
2
@persona-non-grata Violent criminals are obviously prepared to use violence, but I would be careful extrapolating that to all criminals. Just because someone is used to breaking laws does not mean that they are necessarily a violent person.
– forest
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
There are tons of sites you can look up online to determine if a metro area is crime heavy. Some sections are and some sections are not. The number of violent crimes per year along your service route are what you should consider.
If you want to risk your life for cash; that's your prerogative, but I wouldn't advise it. Simply because you and your coworkers don't have the right perspective for dealing with criminals.
In a violent crime scenario where you are the target, your Gun or Ju Jitsu training are not effective. Criminals will always put you in a scenario in which you will be unable to defend yourself. They are more aware than anyone that a citizen may be armed, and criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force.
3
criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force. - A source backing up this claim would greatly improve this answer.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
May 3 at 17:26
@IDrinkandIKnowThings police and citizens are constrained by the law in the use of deadly force. Criminals have no such restrictions, and in violent crimes involving a firearm at the very least use the threat of deadly force to coarse citizens. This isn't even a gun control debate, it's simply true.
– persona-non-grata
May 3 at 17:45
6
The OP is busy dancing around not saying it's Detroit. Detroit is huge, and the metropolitan area is even bigger (it's comparable in size to Luxembourg). Metropolitan crime rate is useless to the OP; they'll need a considerably finer-grained map.
– Mark
May 3 at 20:42
@Mark: which are easily available online. No problem
– Hilmar
2 days ago
2
@persona-non-grata Violent criminals are obviously prepared to use violence, but I would be careful extrapolating that to all criminals. Just because someone is used to breaking laws does not mean that they are necessarily a violent person.
– forest
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
There are tons of sites you can look up online to determine if a metro area is crime heavy. Some sections are and some sections are not. The number of violent crimes per year along your service route are what you should consider.
If you want to risk your life for cash; that's your prerogative, but I wouldn't advise it. Simply because you and your coworkers don't have the right perspective for dealing with criminals.
In a violent crime scenario where you are the target, your Gun or Ju Jitsu training are not effective. Criminals will always put you in a scenario in which you will be unable to defend yourself. They are more aware than anyone that a citizen may be armed, and criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force.
There are tons of sites you can look up online to determine if a metro area is crime heavy. Some sections are and some sections are not. The number of violent crimes per year along your service route are what you should consider.
If you want to risk your life for cash; that's your prerogative, but I wouldn't advise it. Simply because you and your coworkers don't have the right perspective for dealing with criminals.
In a violent crime scenario where you are the target, your Gun or Ju Jitsu training are not effective. Criminals will always put you in a scenario in which you will be unable to defend yourself. They are more aware than anyone that a citizen may be armed, and criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force.
edited May 3 at 16:08
answered May 3 at 15:44
persona-non-gratapersona-non-grata
1495
1495
3
criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force. - A source backing up this claim would greatly improve this answer.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
May 3 at 17:26
@IDrinkandIKnowThings police and citizens are constrained by the law in the use of deadly force. Criminals have no such restrictions, and in violent crimes involving a firearm at the very least use the threat of deadly force to coarse citizens. This isn't even a gun control debate, it's simply true.
– persona-non-grata
May 3 at 17:45
6
The OP is busy dancing around not saying it's Detroit. Detroit is huge, and the metropolitan area is even bigger (it's comparable in size to Luxembourg). Metropolitan crime rate is useless to the OP; they'll need a considerably finer-grained map.
– Mark
May 3 at 20:42
@Mark: which are easily available online. No problem
– Hilmar
2 days ago
2
@persona-non-grata Violent criminals are obviously prepared to use violence, but I would be careful extrapolating that to all criminals. Just because someone is used to breaking laws does not mean that they are necessarily a violent person.
– forest
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
3
criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force. - A source backing up this claim would greatly improve this answer.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
May 3 at 17:26
@IDrinkandIKnowThings police and citizens are constrained by the law in the use of deadly force. Criminals have no such restrictions, and in violent crimes involving a firearm at the very least use the threat of deadly force to coarse citizens. This isn't even a gun control debate, it's simply true.
– persona-non-grata
May 3 at 17:45
6
The OP is busy dancing around not saying it's Detroit. Detroit is huge, and the metropolitan area is even bigger (it's comparable in size to Luxembourg). Metropolitan crime rate is useless to the OP; they'll need a considerably finer-grained map.
– Mark
May 3 at 20:42
@Mark: which are easily available online. No problem
– Hilmar
2 days ago
2
@persona-non-grata Violent criminals are obviously prepared to use violence, but I would be careful extrapolating that to all criminals. Just because someone is used to breaking laws does not mean that they are necessarily a violent person.
– forest
2 days ago
3
3
criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force. - A source backing up this claim would greatly improve this answer.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
May 3 at 17:26
criminals are more prepared than anyone to use deadly force. - A source backing up this claim would greatly improve this answer.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
May 3 at 17:26
@IDrinkandIKnowThings police and citizens are constrained by the law in the use of deadly force. Criminals have no such restrictions, and in violent crimes involving a firearm at the very least use the threat of deadly force to coarse citizens. This isn't even a gun control debate, it's simply true.
– persona-non-grata
May 3 at 17:45
@IDrinkandIKnowThings police and citizens are constrained by the law in the use of deadly force. Criminals have no such restrictions, and in violent crimes involving a firearm at the very least use the threat of deadly force to coarse citizens. This isn't even a gun control debate, it's simply true.
– persona-non-grata
May 3 at 17:45
6
6
The OP is busy dancing around not saying it's Detroit. Detroit is huge, and the metropolitan area is even bigger (it's comparable in size to Luxembourg). Metropolitan crime rate is useless to the OP; they'll need a considerably finer-grained map.
– Mark
May 3 at 20:42
The OP is busy dancing around not saying it's Detroit. Detroit is huge, and the metropolitan area is even bigger (it's comparable in size to Luxembourg). Metropolitan crime rate is useless to the OP; they'll need a considerably finer-grained map.
– Mark
May 3 at 20:42
@Mark: which are easily available online. No problem
– Hilmar
2 days ago
@Mark: which are easily available online. No problem
– Hilmar
2 days ago
2
2
@persona-non-grata Violent criminals are obviously prepared to use violence, but I would be careful extrapolating that to all criminals. Just because someone is used to breaking laws does not mean that they are necessarily a violent person.
– forest
2 days ago
@persona-non-grata Violent criminals are obviously prepared to use violence, but I would be careful extrapolating that to all criminals. Just because someone is used to breaking laws does not mean that they are necessarily a violent person.
– forest
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
Suburban US people believing downtown areas are inherently dangerous is a common thing. But take it with a grain of salt.
Before you take these well-intentioned warnings too seriously, follow up with the people warning you asking for facts. Ask them, "what part of the city are you talking about?" or "who do you know who was attacked, and how did they deal with it?" The people with real knowledge can then give you helpful information. Others may mumble and say "friend of a friend." They will have less useful information. Some of it may be pure BS.
You should, of course, keep an eye on your surroundings in any place where you are a newcomer. If the place you visit suffers from extreme poverty, dress and conduct yourself so you don't stand out too much. Leave your fancy wristwatch and custom-tailored suit at home. You're there to do your job, that's all.
If homeless people are around, it can't hurt to buy a couple of extra coffees and donuts and offer them to people on the street when you take a break. Any sort of personal contact -- anything that shows you're human -- helps you fit in.
Some kinds of workers take serious, ongoing, training in how to use weapons or hand-to-hand combat to defend themselves. If you are a police officer or soldier, you know about this. If you're not, don't try this anywhere you're a newcomer.
I grew up in, have lived and worked in an inner city my entire life. I have absolutely never seen someone fit in by giving a homeless person a donut.
– bruglesco
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Suburban US people believing downtown areas are inherently dangerous is a common thing. But take it with a grain of salt.
Before you take these well-intentioned warnings too seriously, follow up with the people warning you asking for facts. Ask them, "what part of the city are you talking about?" or "who do you know who was attacked, and how did they deal with it?" The people with real knowledge can then give you helpful information. Others may mumble and say "friend of a friend." They will have less useful information. Some of it may be pure BS.
You should, of course, keep an eye on your surroundings in any place where you are a newcomer. If the place you visit suffers from extreme poverty, dress and conduct yourself so you don't stand out too much. Leave your fancy wristwatch and custom-tailored suit at home. You're there to do your job, that's all.
If homeless people are around, it can't hurt to buy a couple of extra coffees and donuts and offer them to people on the street when you take a break. Any sort of personal contact -- anything that shows you're human -- helps you fit in.
Some kinds of workers take serious, ongoing, training in how to use weapons or hand-to-hand combat to defend themselves. If you are a police officer or soldier, you know about this. If you're not, don't try this anywhere you're a newcomer.
I grew up in, have lived and worked in an inner city my entire life. I have absolutely never seen someone fit in by giving a homeless person a donut.
– bruglesco
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Suburban US people believing downtown areas are inherently dangerous is a common thing. But take it with a grain of salt.
Before you take these well-intentioned warnings too seriously, follow up with the people warning you asking for facts. Ask them, "what part of the city are you talking about?" or "who do you know who was attacked, and how did they deal with it?" The people with real knowledge can then give you helpful information. Others may mumble and say "friend of a friend." They will have less useful information. Some of it may be pure BS.
You should, of course, keep an eye on your surroundings in any place where you are a newcomer. If the place you visit suffers from extreme poverty, dress and conduct yourself so you don't stand out too much. Leave your fancy wristwatch and custom-tailored suit at home. You're there to do your job, that's all.
If homeless people are around, it can't hurt to buy a couple of extra coffees and donuts and offer them to people on the street when you take a break. Any sort of personal contact -- anything that shows you're human -- helps you fit in.
Some kinds of workers take serious, ongoing, training in how to use weapons or hand-to-hand combat to defend themselves. If you are a police officer or soldier, you know about this. If you're not, don't try this anywhere you're a newcomer.
Suburban US people believing downtown areas are inherently dangerous is a common thing. But take it with a grain of salt.
Before you take these well-intentioned warnings too seriously, follow up with the people warning you asking for facts. Ask them, "what part of the city are you talking about?" or "who do you know who was attacked, and how did they deal with it?" The people with real knowledge can then give you helpful information. Others may mumble and say "friend of a friend." They will have less useful information. Some of it may be pure BS.
You should, of course, keep an eye on your surroundings in any place where you are a newcomer. If the place you visit suffers from extreme poverty, dress and conduct yourself so you don't stand out too much. Leave your fancy wristwatch and custom-tailored suit at home. You're there to do your job, that's all.
If homeless people are around, it can't hurt to buy a couple of extra coffees and donuts and offer them to people on the street when you take a break. Any sort of personal contact -- anything that shows you're human -- helps you fit in.
Some kinds of workers take serious, ongoing, training in how to use weapons or hand-to-hand combat to defend themselves. If you are a police officer or soldier, you know about this. If you're not, don't try this anywhere you're a newcomer.
answered 2 days ago
O. JonesO. Jones
14.7k24274
14.7k24274
I grew up in, have lived and worked in an inner city my entire life. I have absolutely never seen someone fit in by giving a homeless person a donut.
– bruglesco
5 hours ago
add a comment |
I grew up in, have lived and worked in an inner city my entire life. I have absolutely never seen someone fit in by giving a homeless person a donut.
– bruglesco
5 hours ago
I grew up in, have lived and worked in an inner city my entire life. I have absolutely never seen someone fit in by giving a homeless person a donut.
– bruglesco
5 hours ago
I grew up in, have lived and worked in an inner city my entire life. I have absolutely never seen someone fit in by giving a homeless person a donut.
– bruglesco
5 hours ago
add a comment |
That you might have to go someplace dangerous for your job isn't entirely unheard of though whether it's common depends on what you do and where your customers are. They could also be overreacting, especially if they're making assumptions about your ability to stay safe based on your size, gender, visible disability, etc.
There was a lot more mentioned about how to be safe and I was given a few coupons to free tai-chi/karate lessons and some discounts at a shooting range.
This part isn't normal when coming from "some random HR people". It's one thing to get random safety tips or even bad advice from someone who's just trying to be helpful but it's odd that people in HR would suggest a minimal amount of karate or gun practice with half a moment's notice given their position of protecting the company.
If your company is going to send people to work in dangerous areas, it should be taking official steps to keep their employees safe:
Official safety training that includes how to stay safe in dangerous areas, situational awareness, and risk assessment.
Sending employees to high risk areas in pairs and/or provide security.
add a comment |
That you might have to go someplace dangerous for your job isn't entirely unheard of though whether it's common depends on what you do and where your customers are. They could also be overreacting, especially if they're making assumptions about your ability to stay safe based on your size, gender, visible disability, etc.
There was a lot more mentioned about how to be safe and I was given a few coupons to free tai-chi/karate lessons and some discounts at a shooting range.
This part isn't normal when coming from "some random HR people". It's one thing to get random safety tips or even bad advice from someone who's just trying to be helpful but it's odd that people in HR would suggest a minimal amount of karate or gun practice with half a moment's notice given their position of protecting the company.
If your company is going to send people to work in dangerous areas, it should be taking official steps to keep their employees safe:
Official safety training that includes how to stay safe in dangerous areas, situational awareness, and risk assessment.
Sending employees to high risk areas in pairs and/or provide security.
add a comment |
That you might have to go someplace dangerous for your job isn't entirely unheard of though whether it's common depends on what you do and where your customers are. They could also be overreacting, especially if they're making assumptions about your ability to stay safe based on your size, gender, visible disability, etc.
There was a lot more mentioned about how to be safe and I was given a few coupons to free tai-chi/karate lessons and some discounts at a shooting range.
This part isn't normal when coming from "some random HR people". It's one thing to get random safety tips or even bad advice from someone who's just trying to be helpful but it's odd that people in HR would suggest a minimal amount of karate or gun practice with half a moment's notice given their position of protecting the company.
If your company is going to send people to work in dangerous areas, it should be taking official steps to keep their employees safe:
Official safety training that includes how to stay safe in dangerous areas, situational awareness, and risk assessment.
Sending employees to high risk areas in pairs and/or provide security.
That you might have to go someplace dangerous for your job isn't entirely unheard of though whether it's common depends on what you do and where your customers are. They could also be overreacting, especially if they're making assumptions about your ability to stay safe based on your size, gender, visible disability, etc.
There was a lot more mentioned about how to be safe and I was given a few coupons to free tai-chi/karate lessons and some discounts at a shooting range.
This part isn't normal when coming from "some random HR people". It's one thing to get random safety tips or even bad advice from someone who's just trying to be helpful but it's odd that people in HR would suggest a minimal amount of karate or gun practice with half a moment's notice given their position of protecting the company.
If your company is going to send people to work in dangerous areas, it should be taking official steps to keep their employees safe:
Official safety training that includes how to stay safe in dangerous areas, situational awareness, and risk assessment.
Sending employees to high risk areas in pairs and/or provide security.
answered May 3 at 17:52
BSMPBSMP
3,8891428
3,8891428
add a comment |
add a comment |
Presumably, you get to turn in travel expenses for this trip. Hire two body guards for the day and turn the cost into your boss. Then we'll see how funny your new friends think they are.
add a comment |
Presumably, you get to turn in travel expenses for this trip. Hire two body guards for the day and turn the cost into your boss. Then we'll see how funny your new friends think they are.
add a comment |
Presumably, you get to turn in travel expenses for this trip. Hire two body guards for the day and turn the cost into your boss. Then we'll see how funny your new friends think they are.
Presumably, you get to turn in travel expenses for this trip. Hire two body guards for the day and turn the cost into your boss. Then we'll see how funny your new friends think they are.
answered yesterday
B. GoddardB. Goddard
6354
6354
add a comment |
add a comment |
7
Is it common to prank people in your office, especially "fairly new ones"? If so, I'd be suspect of the warnings. If not, I'd be a bit worried. Do some research of the crime around the actual street address you'll be working and staying at while there.
– Headblender
May 3 at 21:56
Who exactly gave you the coupons? The people who warned you about the place?
– Salman A
2 days ago
"I find this a bit extreme since I'm staying in the states" There are still regions within the States that are quite dangerous, especially at night.
– Mast
yesterday
@Magisch There's no such city as "metropolitan michigan."
– Kyralessa
19 hours ago
@Kyralessa I meant by "metropolitan michigan" something like "a big city in michigan" because I wanted to respect the fact that OP apparently didn't directly mention Detroit, Michigan
– Magisch
19 hours ago