Have there been any examples of re-usable rockets in the past?Why won't the SLS boosters be recovered?Do any realistic rocket systems use different substances for propellant and fuel?How many 1st stage boosters will SpaceX settle for, for its LEO/GTO fleet?Is the Paramagnetism of Liquid Oxygen Ever Considered in Engine or Tank Design?How do rocket propellant combinations rank in terms of “brightness”?How can phenolic (resin?) handle rocket engine nozzle temperatures?Why didn't the space shuttle use non-foam-shedding external tanks?How far have autophage rockets been developed?Have there been any other cheap, modular launcher designs like the OTRAG?Heat Shielding Material for Reusable CraftIs the BFB/super heavy likely to have an easier time landing than the Falcon 9 booster?
Why does Bran want to find Drogon?
How to write numbers and percentage?
Unary Enumeration
Paired t-test means that the variances of the 2 samples are the same?
Is it safe to redirect stdout and stderr to the same file without file descriptor copies?
"Official wife" or "Formal wife"?
Who wrote “A writer only begins a book. A reader finishes it.”
Fill area of x^2+y^2>1 and x^2+y^2>4 using patterns and tikzpicture
Alexandrov's generalization of Cauchy's rigidity theorem
Are there guidelines for finding good names for LaTeX 2e packages and control sequences defined in these packages?
Count all vowels in string
Visual Block Mode edit with sequential number
What is the purpose of the yellow wired panels on the IBM 360 Model 20?
The disk image is 497GB smaller than the target device
Have any humans orbited the Earth in anything other than a prograde orbit?
Storing voxels for a voxel Engine in C++
Why'd a rational buyer offer to buy with no conditions precedent?
How would a developer who mostly fixed bugs for years at a company call out their contributions in their CV?
Are cells guaranteed to get at least one mitochondrion when they divide?
Is keeping the forking link on a true fork necessary (Github/GPL)?
What could be my risk mitigation strategies if my client wants to contract UAT?
One word for 'the thing that attracts me'?
Is there an idiom that means that you are in a very strong negotiation position in a negotiation?
Cisco 3750X Power Cable
Have there been any examples of re-usable rockets in the past?
Why won't the SLS boosters be recovered?Do any realistic rocket systems use different substances for propellant and fuel?How many 1st stage boosters will SpaceX settle for, for its LEO/GTO fleet?Is the Paramagnetism of Liquid Oxygen Ever Considered in Engine or Tank Design?How do rocket propellant combinations rank in terms of “brightness”?How can phenolic (resin?) handle rocket engine nozzle temperatures?Why didn't the space shuttle use non-foam-shedding external tanks?How far have autophage rockets been developed?Have there been any other cheap, modular launcher designs like the OTRAG?Heat Shielding Material for Reusable CraftIs the BFB/super heavy likely to have an easier time landing than the Falcon 9 booster?
$begingroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
New contributor
$endgroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
rockets space-shuttle reuse
New contributor
New contributor
edited May 15 at 17:41
Russell Borogove
92.9k3311395
92.9k3311395
New contributor
asked May 15 at 17:09
RogerRoger
1455
1455
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
1
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Roger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36171%2fhave-there-been-any-examples-of-re-usable-rockets-in-the-past%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.
$endgroup$
The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.
edited May 15 at 20:47
answered May 15 at 19:06
geoffcgeoffc
56.9k10165319
56.9k10165319
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
4
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
$endgroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
edited May 15 at 17:32
answered May 15 at 17:25
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
92.9k3311395
92.9k3311395
add a comment |
add a comment |
Roger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Roger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Roger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Roger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36171%2fhave-there-been-any-examples-of-re-usable-rockets-in-the-past%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06