How can stepwise movement be concordant?What can be “two horizontal intervals of equal distance and discordant” on diatonic scale?Is there a known point in history where dissonance became acceptable?how does the bluegrass major chord built off of the flat 7 “work”?Is there a way to define dissonance such that it can be quantifiable?How to define “simple” when considering consonance and interval ratiosClose transposition but want to avoid dissonanceHow to avoid dissonance when moving from Maj7 to Dom7 chord if pedal is needed to be playedHow to properly unresolve melodies to achieve dissonance and darkness in musicHow to overcome emotional tension with this Beethoven rondoWhat can be “two horizontal intervals of equal distance and discordant” on diatonic scale?

Append unique characters read from filecontents to a string

Dual frame in Riemannian metrics.

How to deal with employer who keeps me at work after working hours

Is there precedent or are there procedures for a US president refusing to concede to an electoral defeat?

Where did Lovecraft write about Carcosa?

Huffman Code in C++

What does the phrase "go for the pin" mean here?

Python 3 - simple temperature program version 1.3

Debian 9 server no sshd in auth.log

TIP120 Transistor + Solenoid Failing Randomly

How can I obtain and work with a Platonic dodecahedron?

When do British people use the word "cookie"?

Do Jedi mind tricks work on Ewoks?

Can I combine SELECT TOP() with the IN operator?

Why doesn't a particle exert force on itself?

What is a common way to tell if an academic is "above average," or outstanding in their field? Is their h-index (Hirsh index) one of them?

Ab major 9th chord in Bach

Can an earth elemental drag a tiny creature underground with Earth Glide?

What's the 2-minute timer on mobile Deutsche Bahn tickets?

Can an Iranian citizen enter the USA on a Dutch passport?

Can a good but unremarkable PhD student become an accomplished professor?

In "Avengers: Endgame", what does this name refer to?

Is it normal for gliders not to have attitude indicators?

Why increasing of the temperature of the objects like wood, paper etc. doesn't fire them?



How can stepwise movement be concordant?


What can be “two horizontal intervals of equal distance and discordant” on diatonic scale?Is there a known point in history where dissonance became acceptable?how does the bluegrass major chord built off of the flat 7 “work”?Is there a way to define dissonance such that it can be quantifiable?How to define “simple” when considering consonance and interval ratiosClose transposition but want to avoid dissonanceHow to avoid dissonance when moving from Maj7 to Dom7 chord if pedal is needed to be playedHow to properly unresolve melodies to achieve dissonance and darkness in musicHow to overcome emotional tension with this Beethoven rondoWhat can be “two horizontal intervals of equal distance and discordant” on diatonic scale?













3















I am learning rules of counterpoint. One of the rules states:




Do not make stepwise concordant movements longer than a fifth.




As far as I understand stepwise movement is either 2nd minor or second major. So, it is either one semi-tone or one tone. Both are dissonant. So, they are discordant (not concordant).



So, how can stepwise movement be concordant?



Here is the source of the rules that I am using.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Can you give the source of that rule? It seem like it means 5 consecutive consonant intervals where one voice is always moving stepwise, like 5 consecutive thirds.

    – Michael Curtis
    May 2 at 15:38















3















I am learning rules of counterpoint. One of the rules states:




Do not make stepwise concordant movements longer than a fifth.




As far as I understand stepwise movement is either 2nd minor or second major. So, it is either one semi-tone or one tone. Both are dissonant. So, they are discordant (not concordant).



So, how can stepwise movement be concordant?



Here is the source of the rules that I am using.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Can you give the source of that rule? It seem like it means 5 consecutive consonant intervals where one voice is always moving stepwise, like 5 consecutive thirds.

    – Michael Curtis
    May 2 at 15:38













3












3








3








I am learning rules of counterpoint. One of the rules states:




Do not make stepwise concordant movements longer than a fifth.




As far as I understand stepwise movement is either 2nd minor or second major. So, it is either one semi-tone or one tone. Both are dissonant. So, they are discordant (not concordant).



So, how can stepwise movement be concordant?



Here is the source of the rules that I am using.










share|improve this question
















I am learning rules of counterpoint. One of the rules states:




Do not make stepwise concordant movements longer than a fifth.




As far as I understand stepwise movement is either 2nd minor or second major. So, it is either one semi-tone or one tone. Both are dissonant. So, they are discordant (not concordant).



So, how can stepwise movement be concordant?



Here is the source of the rules that I am using.







consonance-and-dissonance






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







Roman

















asked May 2 at 14:46









RomanRoman

2136




2136







  • 2





    Can you give the source of that rule? It seem like it means 5 consecutive consonant intervals where one voice is always moving stepwise, like 5 consecutive thirds.

    – Michael Curtis
    May 2 at 15:38












  • 2





    Can you give the source of that rule? It seem like it means 5 consecutive consonant intervals where one voice is always moving stepwise, like 5 consecutive thirds.

    – Michael Curtis
    May 2 at 15:38







2




2





Can you give the source of that rule? It seem like it means 5 consecutive consonant intervals where one voice is always moving stepwise, like 5 consecutive thirds.

– Michael Curtis
May 2 at 15:38





Can you give the source of that rule? It seem like it means 5 consecutive consonant intervals where one voice is always moving stepwise, like 5 consecutive thirds.

– Michael Curtis
May 2 at 15:38










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














I think the rule would result in examples like these...



enter image description here



...where the rules says to avoid movement like the first two examples.



The third is OK - by the rule - because there is at least one dissonance.



I haven't seen a rule with the specific wording, but the general principle is...



  • use a variety of intervals and motion types to create interesting counterpoint

  • use dissonance as a dynamic force to move the music forward.


...do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave.




I think the misunderstanding comes from the rule being poorly worded. Maybe they should use range. "...stepwise movement ranging more than a fifth..." Such movement would be the parts I circled in red. I don't think they mean the size of a melodic leap.



The "concordant" part could refer to melodic intervals like the tritone F leaping up to B which is often avoided. That that melodic concord meaning doesn't make sense to specify when the movement is already described as step-wise. I can only assume the concords are those formed in counterpoint with another line.



I'm still not sure where you got this rule. If you don't have a copy of Fux's species counterpoint, you should try to get one. It's one of the seminal counterpoint books. Personally, I have more faith in "rules" when they come from the most authoritative sources... or from real scores.






share|improve this answer

























  • this are computer rules for cantus firmus and counter point: the general rules with MR (majority rules) mean that not all writers and theorists share the same opinion. That means: also the rules by Fux are opinion based. This is my opinion ;)

    – Albrecht Hügli
    May 2 at 17:24











  • Sure, "rules" in art aren't really rules. I had a feeling the paper was about computer programming. I only skimmed the abstract.

    – Michael Curtis
    May 2 at 17:28











  • @MichaelCurtis, thanks for the answer. I still do not get what "concordant" refers to in the rule that I have cited. Is it about the total interval spanned by the compound motion (the one that is not allowed to be "longer than 5th")? I tend to think that the author of the rule meant that each move is concordant and the sum of those moves cannot be larger than 5th.

    – Roman
    2 days ago











  • Concordant mean consonant. They are synonymous terms. Concord and discord being the same as consonance and dissonance.

    – Michael Curtis
    2 days ago


















3














I suspect that your source for that rule is this paper, and I note that the authors appear to be Italian. The English awkward in many places, not least in the phrase "longer than a fifth," and I suspect that stepwise is a mistranslation from some Italian word. It is clear from the context that the word should instead be consecutive.






share|improve this answer

























  • I also found this source (that I've accidentally downloaded the other day). MR means: not all the autors share the same opinion. I'll add the picture to my answer.

    – Albrecht Hügli
    May 2 at 16:10











  • @phoog, thanks for the answer. I sill do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave. Both of them are note concordant (they are consonant).

    – Roman
    May 2 at 16:44











  • @Roman isn't "concordant" synonymous with "consonant"? You implied as much in your question.

    – phoog
    May 2 at 16:52


















0














It means what Michael assumes:



Do not make longer passages with parallel thirds or sixths (maximum four episodes)



(as four steps will be a fifth)






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "240"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84469%2fhow-can-stepwise-movement-be-concordant%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    I think the rule would result in examples like these...



    enter image description here



    ...where the rules says to avoid movement like the first two examples.



    The third is OK - by the rule - because there is at least one dissonance.



    I haven't seen a rule with the specific wording, but the general principle is...



    • use a variety of intervals and motion types to create interesting counterpoint

    • use dissonance as a dynamic force to move the music forward.


    ...do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave.




    I think the misunderstanding comes from the rule being poorly worded. Maybe they should use range. "...stepwise movement ranging more than a fifth..." Such movement would be the parts I circled in red. I don't think they mean the size of a melodic leap.



    The "concordant" part could refer to melodic intervals like the tritone F leaping up to B which is often avoided. That that melodic concord meaning doesn't make sense to specify when the movement is already described as step-wise. I can only assume the concords are those formed in counterpoint with another line.



    I'm still not sure where you got this rule. If you don't have a copy of Fux's species counterpoint, you should try to get one. It's one of the seminal counterpoint books. Personally, I have more faith in "rules" when they come from the most authoritative sources... or from real scores.






    share|improve this answer

























    • this are computer rules for cantus firmus and counter point: the general rules with MR (majority rules) mean that not all writers and theorists share the same opinion. That means: also the rules by Fux are opinion based. This is my opinion ;)

      – Albrecht Hügli
      May 2 at 17:24











    • Sure, "rules" in art aren't really rules. I had a feeling the paper was about computer programming. I only skimmed the abstract.

      – Michael Curtis
      May 2 at 17:28











    • @MichaelCurtis, thanks for the answer. I still do not get what "concordant" refers to in the rule that I have cited. Is it about the total interval spanned by the compound motion (the one that is not allowed to be "longer than 5th")? I tend to think that the author of the rule meant that each move is concordant and the sum of those moves cannot be larger than 5th.

      – Roman
      2 days ago











    • Concordant mean consonant. They are synonymous terms. Concord and discord being the same as consonance and dissonance.

      – Michael Curtis
      2 days ago















    4














    I think the rule would result in examples like these...



    enter image description here



    ...where the rules says to avoid movement like the first two examples.



    The third is OK - by the rule - because there is at least one dissonance.



    I haven't seen a rule with the specific wording, but the general principle is...



    • use a variety of intervals and motion types to create interesting counterpoint

    • use dissonance as a dynamic force to move the music forward.


    ...do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave.




    I think the misunderstanding comes from the rule being poorly worded. Maybe they should use range. "...stepwise movement ranging more than a fifth..." Such movement would be the parts I circled in red. I don't think they mean the size of a melodic leap.



    The "concordant" part could refer to melodic intervals like the tritone F leaping up to B which is often avoided. That that melodic concord meaning doesn't make sense to specify when the movement is already described as step-wise. I can only assume the concords are those formed in counterpoint with another line.



    I'm still not sure where you got this rule. If you don't have a copy of Fux's species counterpoint, you should try to get one. It's one of the seminal counterpoint books. Personally, I have more faith in "rules" when they come from the most authoritative sources... or from real scores.






    share|improve this answer

























    • this are computer rules for cantus firmus and counter point: the general rules with MR (majority rules) mean that not all writers and theorists share the same opinion. That means: also the rules by Fux are opinion based. This is my opinion ;)

      – Albrecht Hügli
      May 2 at 17:24











    • Sure, "rules" in art aren't really rules. I had a feeling the paper was about computer programming. I only skimmed the abstract.

      – Michael Curtis
      May 2 at 17:28











    • @MichaelCurtis, thanks for the answer. I still do not get what "concordant" refers to in the rule that I have cited. Is it about the total interval spanned by the compound motion (the one that is not allowed to be "longer than 5th")? I tend to think that the author of the rule meant that each move is concordant and the sum of those moves cannot be larger than 5th.

      – Roman
      2 days ago











    • Concordant mean consonant. They are synonymous terms. Concord and discord being the same as consonance and dissonance.

      – Michael Curtis
      2 days ago













    4












    4








    4







    I think the rule would result in examples like these...



    enter image description here



    ...where the rules says to avoid movement like the first two examples.



    The third is OK - by the rule - because there is at least one dissonance.



    I haven't seen a rule with the specific wording, but the general principle is...



    • use a variety of intervals and motion types to create interesting counterpoint

    • use dissonance as a dynamic force to move the music forward.


    ...do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave.




    I think the misunderstanding comes from the rule being poorly worded. Maybe they should use range. "...stepwise movement ranging more than a fifth..." Such movement would be the parts I circled in red. I don't think they mean the size of a melodic leap.



    The "concordant" part could refer to melodic intervals like the tritone F leaping up to B which is often avoided. That that melodic concord meaning doesn't make sense to specify when the movement is already described as step-wise. I can only assume the concords are those formed in counterpoint with another line.



    I'm still not sure where you got this rule. If you don't have a copy of Fux's species counterpoint, you should try to get one. It's one of the seminal counterpoint books. Personally, I have more faith in "rules" when they come from the most authoritative sources... or from real scores.






    share|improve this answer















    I think the rule would result in examples like these...



    enter image description here



    ...where the rules says to avoid movement like the first two examples.



    The third is OK - by the rule - because there is at least one dissonance.



    I haven't seen a rule with the specific wording, but the general principle is...



    • use a variety of intervals and motion types to create interesting counterpoint

    • use dissonance as a dynamic force to move the music forward.


    ...do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave.




    I think the misunderstanding comes from the rule being poorly worded. Maybe they should use range. "...stepwise movement ranging more than a fifth..." Such movement would be the parts I circled in red. I don't think they mean the size of a melodic leap.



    The "concordant" part could refer to melodic intervals like the tritone F leaping up to B which is often avoided. That that melodic concord meaning doesn't make sense to specify when the movement is already described as step-wise. I can only assume the concords are those formed in counterpoint with another line.



    I'm still not sure where you got this rule. If you don't have a copy of Fux's species counterpoint, you should try to get one. It's one of the seminal counterpoint books. Personally, I have more faith in "rules" when they come from the most authoritative sources... or from real scores.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 2 at 17:27

























    answered May 2 at 17:05









    Michael CurtisMichael Curtis

    13.4k1047




    13.4k1047












    • this are computer rules for cantus firmus and counter point: the general rules with MR (majority rules) mean that not all writers and theorists share the same opinion. That means: also the rules by Fux are opinion based. This is my opinion ;)

      – Albrecht Hügli
      May 2 at 17:24











    • Sure, "rules" in art aren't really rules. I had a feeling the paper was about computer programming. I only skimmed the abstract.

      – Michael Curtis
      May 2 at 17:28











    • @MichaelCurtis, thanks for the answer. I still do not get what "concordant" refers to in the rule that I have cited. Is it about the total interval spanned by the compound motion (the one that is not allowed to be "longer than 5th")? I tend to think that the author of the rule meant that each move is concordant and the sum of those moves cannot be larger than 5th.

      – Roman
      2 days ago











    • Concordant mean consonant. They are synonymous terms. Concord and discord being the same as consonance and dissonance.

      – Michael Curtis
      2 days ago

















    • this are computer rules for cantus firmus and counter point: the general rules with MR (majority rules) mean that not all writers and theorists share the same opinion. That means: also the rules by Fux are opinion based. This is my opinion ;)

      – Albrecht Hügli
      May 2 at 17:24











    • Sure, "rules" in art aren't really rules. I had a feeling the paper was about computer programming. I only skimmed the abstract.

      – Michael Curtis
      May 2 at 17:28











    • @MichaelCurtis, thanks for the answer. I still do not get what "concordant" refers to in the rule that I have cited. Is it about the total interval spanned by the compound motion (the one that is not allowed to be "longer than 5th")? I tend to think that the author of the rule meant that each move is concordant and the sum of those moves cannot be larger than 5th.

      – Roman
      2 days ago











    • Concordant mean consonant. They are synonymous terms. Concord and discord being the same as consonance and dissonance.

      – Michael Curtis
      2 days ago
















    this are computer rules for cantus firmus and counter point: the general rules with MR (majority rules) mean that not all writers and theorists share the same opinion. That means: also the rules by Fux are opinion based. This is my opinion ;)

    – Albrecht Hügli
    May 2 at 17:24





    this are computer rules for cantus firmus and counter point: the general rules with MR (majority rules) mean that not all writers and theorists share the same opinion. That means: also the rules by Fux are opinion based. This is my opinion ;)

    – Albrecht Hügli
    May 2 at 17:24













    Sure, "rules" in art aren't really rules. I had a feeling the paper was about computer programming. I only skimmed the abstract.

    – Michael Curtis
    May 2 at 17:28





    Sure, "rules" in art aren't really rules. I had a feeling the paper was about computer programming. I only skimmed the abstract.

    – Michael Curtis
    May 2 at 17:28













    @MichaelCurtis, thanks for the answer. I still do not get what "concordant" refers to in the rule that I have cited. Is it about the total interval spanned by the compound motion (the one that is not allowed to be "longer than 5th")? I tend to think that the author of the rule meant that each move is concordant and the sum of those moves cannot be larger than 5th.

    – Roman
    2 days ago





    @MichaelCurtis, thanks for the answer. I still do not get what "concordant" refers to in the rule that I have cited. Is it about the total interval spanned by the compound motion (the one that is not allowed to be "longer than 5th")? I tend to think that the author of the rule meant that each move is concordant and the sum of those moves cannot be larger than 5th.

    – Roman
    2 days ago













    Concordant mean consonant. They are synonymous terms. Concord and discord being the same as consonance and dissonance.

    – Michael Curtis
    2 days ago





    Concordant mean consonant. They are synonymous terms. Concord and discord being the same as consonance and dissonance.

    – Michael Curtis
    2 days ago











    3














    I suspect that your source for that rule is this paper, and I note that the authors appear to be Italian. The English awkward in many places, not least in the phrase "longer than a fifth," and I suspect that stepwise is a mistranslation from some Italian word. It is clear from the context that the word should instead be consecutive.






    share|improve this answer

























    • I also found this source (that I've accidentally downloaded the other day). MR means: not all the autors share the same opinion. I'll add the picture to my answer.

      – Albrecht Hügli
      May 2 at 16:10











    • @phoog, thanks for the answer. I sill do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave. Both of them are note concordant (they are consonant).

      – Roman
      May 2 at 16:44











    • @Roman isn't "concordant" synonymous with "consonant"? You implied as much in your question.

      – phoog
      May 2 at 16:52















    3














    I suspect that your source for that rule is this paper, and I note that the authors appear to be Italian. The English awkward in many places, not least in the phrase "longer than a fifth," and I suspect that stepwise is a mistranslation from some Italian word. It is clear from the context that the word should instead be consecutive.






    share|improve this answer

























    • I also found this source (that I've accidentally downloaded the other day). MR means: not all the autors share the same opinion. I'll add the picture to my answer.

      – Albrecht Hügli
      May 2 at 16:10











    • @phoog, thanks for the answer. I sill do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave. Both of them are note concordant (they are consonant).

      – Roman
      May 2 at 16:44











    • @Roman isn't "concordant" synonymous with "consonant"? You implied as much in your question.

      – phoog
      May 2 at 16:52













    3












    3








    3







    I suspect that your source for that rule is this paper, and I note that the authors appear to be Italian. The English awkward in many places, not least in the phrase "longer than a fifth," and I suspect that stepwise is a mistranslation from some Italian word. It is clear from the context that the word should instead be consecutive.






    share|improve this answer















    I suspect that your source for that rule is this paper, and I note that the authors appear to be Italian. The English awkward in many places, not least in the phrase "longer than a fifth," and I suspect that stepwise is a mistranslation from some Italian word. It is clear from the context that the word should instead be consecutive.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 2 at 16:52

























    answered May 2 at 15:50









    phoogphoog

    1,06859




    1,06859












    • I also found this source (that I've accidentally downloaded the other day). MR means: not all the autors share the same opinion. I'll add the picture to my answer.

      – Albrecht Hügli
      May 2 at 16:10











    • @phoog, thanks for the answer. I sill do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave. Both of them are note concordant (they are consonant).

      – Roman
      May 2 at 16:44











    • @Roman isn't "concordant" synonymous with "consonant"? You implied as much in your question.

      – phoog
      May 2 at 16:52

















    • I also found this source (that I've accidentally downloaded the other day). MR means: not all the autors share the same opinion. I'll add the picture to my answer.

      – Albrecht Hügli
      May 2 at 16:10











    • @phoog, thanks for the answer. I sill do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave. Both of them are note concordant (they are consonant).

      – Roman
      May 2 at 16:44











    • @Roman isn't "concordant" synonymous with "consonant"? You implied as much in your question.

      – phoog
      May 2 at 16:52
















    I also found this source (that I've accidentally downloaded the other day). MR means: not all the autors share the same opinion. I'll add the picture to my answer.

    – Albrecht Hügli
    May 2 at 16:10





    I also found this source (that I've accidentally downloaded the other day). MR means: not all the autors share the same opinion. I'll add the picture to my answer.

    – Albrecht Hügli
    May 2 at 16:10













    @phoog, thanks for the answer. I sill do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave. Both of them are note concordant (they are consonant).

    – Roman
    May 2 at 16:44





    @phoog, thanks for the answer. I sill do not understand how a concordant movement can be longer than fifth. The only allowed intervals that are larger than 5th are minor 6th and octave. Both of them are note concordant (they are consonant).

    – Roman
    May 2 at 16:44













    @Roman isn't "concordant" synonymous with "consonant"? You implied as much in your question.

    – phoog
    May 2 at 16:52





    @Roman isn't "concordant" synonymous with "consonant"? You implied as much in your question.

    – phoog
    May 2 at 16:52











    0














    It means what Michael assumes:



    Do not make longer passages with parallel thirds or sixths (maximum four episodes)



    (as four steps will be a fifth)






    share|improve this answer





























      0














      It means what Michael assumes:



      Do not make longer passages with parallel thirds or sixths (maximum four episodes)



      (as four steps will be a fifth)






      share|improve this answer



























        0












        0








        0







        It means what Michael assumes:



        Do not make longer passages with parallel thirds or sixths (maximum four episodes)



        (as four steps will be a fifth)






        share|improve this answer















        It means what Michael assumes:



        Do not make longer passages with parallel thirds or sixths (maximum four episodes)



        (as four steps will be a fifth)







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 2 at 17:17

























        answered May 2 at 16:05









        Albrecht HügliAlbrecht Hügli

        5,8021522




        5,8021522



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84469%2fhow-can-stepwise-movement-be-concordant%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?