Math symbols in math operatorsPutting limits *underneath* new operatorsLimits used as exponents — how to write under the limit symbol without using displaymath?Creating a circled operator which expands into a lozengeFor Hom and H*(X,Z) — which fonts?Math operator seeing as environmentSymbol for m by n matrixInline-style variant of undersetlist of canonical math operatorsPre-define complicated math operatorsProper way to semantically enclose several characters as a single name
How to positively portray high and mighty characters?
A player is constantly pestering me about rules, what do I do as a DM?
How can Charles Proxy change settings without admin rights after first time?
Injective map of abelian group and product of cyclic quotients
Is there a maximum distance from a planet that a moon can orbit?
Is there any set of 2-6 notes that doesn't have a chord name?
Alphabet completion rate
Why do some games show lights shine through walls?
Could Sauron have read Tom Bombadil's mind if Tom had held the Palantir?
Singing along to guitar chords (harmony)
Is there any reason to avoid sunglasses with blue lenses?
Ending: accusative or not?
Intuitively, why does putting capacitors in series decrease the equivalent capacitance?
Why does the numerical solution of an ODE move away from an unstable equilibrium?
How to perform Login Authentication at the client-side?
Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?
How many satellites can stay in a Lagrange point?
How dangerous are set-size assumptions?
How to get cool night-vision without lame drawbacks?
The impact of an intelligent and (mostly) hostile flying race on weapons and armor
Does Marvel have an equivalent of the Green Lantern?
Why does adding parentheses prevent an error?
How come I was asked by a CBP officer why I was in the US?
Does squid ink pasta bleed?
Math symbols in math operators
Putting limits *underneath* new operatorsLimits used as exponents — how to write under the limit symbol without using displaymath?Creating a circled operator which expands into a lozengeFor Hom and H*(X,Z) — which fonts?Math operator seeing as environmentSymbol for m by n matrixInline-style variant of undersetlist of canonical math operatorsPre-define complicated math operatorsProper way to semantically enclose several characters as a single name
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I would like to customize the weak-star limit as a math operator. It should look like w$^*$-lim. I don't want to use w*-lim or w^*-lim because it looks ugly. But when I write
DeclareMathOperator*wslimw$^*$-lim
I get an error because dollars cannot be used in mathrm mode. How can I make this happen?
math-operators
asked Jun 16 at 13:42
amsmathamsmath
1234 bronze badges
New contributor
amsmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I would like to customize the weak-star limit as a math operator. It should look like w$^*$-lim. I don't want to use w*-lim or w^*-lim because it looks ugly. But when I write
DeclareMathOperator*wslimw$^*$-lim
I get an error because dollars cannot be used in mathrm mode. How can I make this happen?
math-operators
asked Jun 16 at 13:42
amsmathamsmath
1234 bronze badges
New contributor
amsmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Welcome to tex.sx. Your question about why MathJax doesn't work here is answered by this meta question: tex.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1272
– barbara beeton
Jun 16 at 14:05
You commented on the meta question that you don't like mathjax not being enabled, I suggest that you use the site for a while longer to see why that is a good policy.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:50
add a comment |
I would like to customize the weak-star limit as a math operator. It should look like w$^*$-lim. I don't want to use w*-lim or w^*-lim because it looks ugly. But when I write
DeclareMathOperator*wslimw$^*$-lim
I get an error because dollars cannot be used in mathrm mode. How can I make this happen?
math-operators
asked Jun 16 at 13:42
amsmathamsmath
1234 bronze badges
New contributor
amsmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I would like to customize the weak-star limit as a math operator. It should look like w$^*$-lim. I don't want to use w*-lim or w^*-lim because it looks ugly. But when I write
DeclareMathOperator*wslimw$^*$-lim
I get an error because dollars cannot be used in mathrm mode. How can I make this happen?
math-operators
math-operators
asked Jun 16 at 13:42
amsmathamsmath
1234 bronze badges
New contributor
amsmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jun 16 at 13:42
amsmathamsmath
1234 bronze badges
New contributor
amsmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Jun 16 at 14:28
amsmath
asked Jun 16 at 13:42
amsmathamsmath
1234 bronze badges
New contributor
amsmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jun 16 at 13:42
amsmathamsmath
1234 bronze badges
asked Jun 16 at 13:42
amsmathamsmath
1234 bronze badges
1234 bronze badges
New contributor
amsmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
amsmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Welcome to tex.sx. Your question about why MathJax doesn't work here is answered by this meta question: tex.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1272
– barbara beeton
Jun 16 at 14:05
You commented on the meta question that you don't like mathjax not being enabled, I suggest that you use the site for a while longer to see why that is a good policy.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:50
add a comment |
Welcome to tex.sx. Your question about why MathJax doesn't work here is answered by this meta question: tex.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1272
– barbara beeton
Jun 16 at 14:05
You commented on the meta question that you don't like mathjax not being enabled, I suggest that you use the site for a while longer to see why that is a good policy.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:50
Welcome to tex.sx. Your question about why MathJax doesn't work here is answered by this meta question: tex.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1272
– barbara beeton
Jun 16 at 14:05
Welcome to tex.sx. Your question about why MathJax doesn't work here is answered by this meta question: tex.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1272
– barbara beeton
Jun 16 at 14:05
You commented on the meta question that you don't like mathjax not being enabled, I suggest that you use the site for a while longer to see why that is a good policy.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:50
You commented on the meta question that you don't like mathjax not being enabled, I suggest that you use the site for a while longer to see why that is a good policy.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:50
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
* obtains a special mathcode inside the AMS math operator setup, but here you want the standard star which is still available as ast :
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimaw^*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimbw^ast-lim
begindocument
[wslima a quad wslimb a]
enddocument
Note the reason for the redefinition is to make it possible to just use w* which is the intended markup here although as you note it does not produce the same symbol (or use the same font) as a normal math ^*.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimw*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimaw^*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimbw^ast-lim
begindocument
[wslim a quad wslima a quad wslimb a]
enddocument
answered Jun 16 at 14:32
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
511k43 gold badges1163 silver badges1924 bronze badges
Finally someone who reads the question carefully. Thanks so much!!!
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:38
1
@amsmath it also helps that I'm the current maintainer of the package and I had an idea what it was doing without needing to read the question that carefully:-)
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:39
1
You're the maintainer of the amsmath package? Then you should like my nick. ;-)
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:43
6
@amsmath actually I was considering asking you to change it, it may be confusing to others.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:47
add a comment |
Maybe you'd be interested in this variant:
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimwraisebox-1.5pt$^* $mkern-2mu-lim
begindocument
[ wslim f ]%
enddocument
answered Jun 16 at 14:06
BernardBernard
182k7 gold badges83 silver badges216 bronze badges
I wrote in my question: "I don't want to usew*-limbecause it looks ugly"...
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:09
Sorry, I didn't notice it. I mainly focused on not having compilation errors. For me the exponent is too high w.r.t. a lowercase letter. I even tried a simple textsuperscript, but I obtained the same result as with math mode.
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:15
I've modified my code. Is it more like you want?
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:56
@Bernard I vote instead your answer. Nice :-)
– Sebastiano
Jun 17 at 21:19
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
amsmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496005%2fmath-symbols-in-math-operators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
* obtains a special mathcode inside the AMS math operator setup, but here you want the standard star which is still available as ast :
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimaw^*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimbw^ast-lim
begindocument
[wslima a quad wslimb a]
enddocument
Note the reason for the redefinition is to make it possible to just use w* which is the intended markup here although as you note it does not produce the same symbol (or use the same font) as a normal math ^*.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimw*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimaw^*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimbw^ast-lim
begindocument
[wslim a quad wslima a quad wslimb a]
enddocument
answered Jun 16 at 14:32
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
511k43 gold badges1163 silver badges1924 bronze badges
Finally someone who reads the question carefully. Thanks so much!!!
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:38
1
@amsmath it also helps that I'm the current maintainer of the package and I had an idea what it was doing without needing to read the question that carefully:-)
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:39
1
You're the maintainer of the amsmath package? Then you should like my nick. ;-)
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:43
6
@amsmath actually I was considering asking you to change it, it may be confusing to others.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:47
add a comment |
* obtains a special mathcode inside the AMS math operator setup, but here you want the standard star which is still available as ast :
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimaw^*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimbw^ast-lim
begindocument
[wslima a quad wslimb a]
enddocument
Note the reason for the redefinition is to make it possible to just use w* which is the intended markup here although as you note it does not produce the same symbol (or use the same font) as a normal math ^*.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimw*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimaw^*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimbw^ast-lim
begindocument
[wslim a quad wslima a quad wslimb a]
enddocument
answered Jun 16 at 14:32
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
511k43 gold badges1163 silver badges1924 bronze badges
Finally someone who reads the question carefully. Thanks so much!!!
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:38
1
@amsmath it also helps that I'm the current maintainer of the package and I had an idea what it was doing without needing to read the question that carefully:-)
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:39
1
You're the maintainer of the amsmath package? Then you should like my nick. ;-)
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:43
6
@amsmath actually I was considering asking you to change it, it may be confusing to others.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:47
add a comment |
* obtains a special mathcode inside the AMS math operator setup, but here you want the standard star which is still available as ast :
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimaw^*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimbw^ast-lim
begindocument
[wslima a quad wslimb a]
enddocument
Note the reason for the redefinition is to make it possible to just use w* which is the intended markup here although as you note it does not produce the same symbol (or use the same font) as a normal math ^*.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimw*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimaw^*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimbw^ast-lim
begindocument
[wslim a quad wslima a quad wslimb a]
enddocument
answered Jun 16 at 14:32
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
511k43 gold badges1163 silver badges1924 bronze badges
* obtains a special mathcode inside the AMS math operator setup, but here you want the standard star which is still available as ast :
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimaw^*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimbw^ast-lim
begindocument
[wslima a quad wslimb a]
enddocument
Note the reason for the redefinition is to make it possible to just use w* which is the intended markup here although as you note it does not produce the same symbol (or use the same font) as a normal math ^*.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimw*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimaw^*-lim
DeclareMathOperator*wslimbw^ast-lim
begindocument
[wslim a quad wslima a quad wslimb a]
enddocument
answered Jun 16 at 14:32
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
511k43 gold badges1163 silver badges1924 bronze badges
edited Jun 16 at 15:53
answered Jun 16 at 14:32
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
511k43 gold badges1163 silver badges1924 bronze badges
answered Jun 16 at 14:32
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
511k43 gold badges1163 silver badges1924 bronze badges
answered Jun 16 at 14:32
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
511k43 gold badges1163 silver badges1924 bronze badges
511k43 gold badges1163 silver badges1924 bronze badges
Finally someone who reads the question carefully. Thanks so much!!!
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:38
1
@amsmath it also helps that I'm the current maintainer of the package and I had an idea what it was doing without needing to read the question that carefully:-)
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:39
1
You're the maintainer of the amsmath package? Then you should like my nick. ;-)
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:43
6
@amsmath actually I was considering asking you to change it, it may be confusing to others.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:47
add a comment |
Finally someone who reads the question carefully. Thanks so much!!!
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:38
1
@amsmath it also helps that I'm the current maintainer of the package and I had an idea what it was doing without needing to read the question that carefully:-)
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:39
1
You're the maintainer of the amsmath package? Then you should like my nick. ;-)
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:43
6
@amsmath actually I was considering asking you to change it, it may be confusing to others.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:47
Finally someone who reads the question carefully. Thanks so much!!!
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:38
Finally someone who reads the question carefully. Thanks so much!!!
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:38
1
1
@amsmath it also helps that I'm the current maintainer of the package and I had an idea what it was doing without needing to read the question that carefully:-)
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:39
@amsmath it also helps that I'm the current maintainer of the package and I had an idea what it was doing without needing to read the question that carefully:-)
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:39
1
1
You're the maintainer of the amsmath package? Then you should like my nick. ;-)
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:43
You're the maintainer of the amsmath package? Then you should like my nick. ;-)
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:43
6
6
@amsmath actually I was considering asking you to change it, it may be confusing to others.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:47
@amsmath actually I was considering asking you to change it, it may be confusing to others.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:47
add a comment |
Maybe you'd be interested in this variant:
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimwraisebox-1.5pt$^* $mkern-2mu-lim
begindocument
[ wslim f ]%
enddocument
answered Jun 16 at 14:06
BernardBernard
182k7 gold badges83 silver badges216 bronze badges
I wrote in my question: "I don't want to usew*-limbecause it looks ugly"...
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:09
Sorry, I didn't notice it. I mainly focused on not having compilation errors. For me the exponent is too high w.r.t. a lowercase letter. I even tried a simple textsuperscript, but I obtained the same result as with math mode.
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:15
I've modified my code. Is it more like you want?
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:56
@Bernard I vote instead your answer. Nice :-)
– Sebastiano
Jun 17 at 21:19
add a comment |
Maybe you'd be interested in this variant:
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimwraisebox-1.5pt$^* $mkern-2mu-lim
begindocument
[ wslim f ]%
enddocument
answered Jun 16 at 14:06
BernardBernard
182k7 gold badges83 silver badges216 bronze badges
I wrote in my question: "I don't want to usew*-limbecause it looks ugly"...
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:09
Sorry, I didn't notice it. I mainly focused on not having compilation errors. For me the exponent is too high w.r.t. a lowercase letter. I even tried a simple textsuperscript, but I obtained the same result as with math mode.
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:15
I've modified my code. Is it more like you want?
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:56
@Bernard I vote instead your answer. Nice :-)
– Sebastiano
Jun 17 at 21:19
add a comment |
Maybe you'd be interested in this variant:
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimwraisebox-1.5pt$^* $mkern-2mu-lim
begindocument
[ wslim f ]%
enddocument
answered Jun 16 at 14:06
BernardBernard
182k7 gold badges83 silver badges216 bronze badges
Maybe you'd be interested in this variant:
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperator*wslimwraisebox-1.5pt$^* $mkern-2mu-lim
begindocument
[ wslim f ]%
enddocument
answered Jun 16 at 14:06
BernardBernard
182k7 gold badges83 silver badges216 bronze badges
edited Jun 16 at 14:51
answered Jun 16 at 14:06
BernardBernard
182k7 gold badges83 silver badges216 bronze badges
answered Jun 16 at 14:06
BernardBernard
182k7 gold badges83 silver badges216 bronze badges
answered Jun 16 at 14:06
BernardBernard
182k7 gold badges83 silver badges216 bronze badges
182k7 gold badges83 silver badges216 bronze badges
I wrote in my question: "I don't want to usew*-limbecause it looks ugly"...
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:09
Sorry, I didn't notice it. I mainly focused on not having compilation errors. For me the exponent is too high w.r.t. a lowercase letter. I even tried a simple textsuperscript, but I obtained the same result as with math mode.
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:15
I've modified my code. Is it more like you want?
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:56
@Bernard I vote instead your answer. Nice :-)
– Sebastiano
Jun 17 at 21:19
add a comment |
I wrote in my question: "I don't want to usew*-limbecause it looks ugly"...
– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:09
Sorry, I didn't notice it. I mainly focused on not having compilation errors. For me the exponent is too high w.r.t. a lowercase letter. I even tried a simple textsuperscript, but I obtained the same result as with math mode.
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:15
I've modified my code. Is it more like you want?
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:56
@Bernard I vote instead your answer. Nice :-)
– Sebastiano
Jun 17 at 21:19
I wrote in my question: "I don't want to use
w*-lim because it looks ugly"...– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:09
I wrote in my question: "I don't want to use
w*-lim because it looks ugly"...– amsmath
Jun 16 at 14:09
Sorry, I didn't notice it. I mainly focused on not having compilation errors. For me the exponent is too high w.r.t. a lowercase letter. I even tried a simple textsuperscript, but I obtained the same result as with math mode.
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:15
Sorry, I didn't notice it. I mainly focused on not having compilation errors. For me the exponent is too high w.r.t. a lowercase letter. I even tried a simple textsuperscript, but I obtained the same result as with math mode.
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:15
I've modified my code. Is it more like you want?
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:56
I've modified my code. Is it more like you want?
– Bernard
Jun 16 at 14:56
@Bernard I vote instead your answer. Nice :-)
– Sebastiano
Jun 17 at 21:19
@Bernard I vote instead your answer. Nice :-)
– Sebastiano
Jun 17 at 21:19
add a comment |
amsmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
amsmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
amsmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
amsmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496005%2fmath-symbols-in-math-operators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Welcome to tex.sx. Your question about why MathJax doesn't work here is answered by this meta question: tex.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1272
– barbara beeton
Jun 16 at 14:05
You commented on the meta question that you don't like mathjax not being enabled, I suggest that you use the site for a while longer to see why that is a good policy.
– David Carlisle
Jun 16 at 14:50