Can you run PoE Cat6 alongside standard Cat6 cables?Can Power Over Ethernet be daisy chained?How Can I Connect Two Sets of Computers Within My Home Office So There's No Cables On the Floor?Networking a POE VOIP phone and a non-POE router with one Ethernet portDaisy chaining PoE switches for IP security camera systemDo RJ45s need to be wired differently to enable POE (Power over ethernet)?Can I use Cat5/Cat6 instead of phone cablesDo Cat5e Or Cat6?What could cause Power over Ethernet not to work with a specific cable?S/FTP or U/FTP when wiring a house with CAT6a cabels for 10GbE?Location-dependent problems with PoE with confirmed-good components

Finding overlapping polygons in two shapefiles and deleting them in R?

VHDL: is there a way to create an entity into which constants can be passed?

How does the Melf's Minute Meteors spell interact with the Evocation wizard's Sculpt Spells feature?

Run Bash scripts in folder all at the same time

Need a non-volatile memory IC with near unlimited read/write operations capability

Is it stylistically sound to use onomatopoeic words?

Restrict Access to internet for all MAC except listed on LINKSYS Wireless-N ADSL2+ Modem Router

Distinguish the explanations of Galadriel's test in LotR

Four ships at the ocean with the same distance

How to anchor the origin (0,0,0) to the center of multiple generated images in tikz?

Would a carnivorous diet be able to support a giant worm?

How should I ask for a "pint" in countries that use metric?

Did the Ottoman empire suppress the printing press?

How was the Shuttle loaded and unloaded from its carrier aircraft?

Why AI became applicable only after Nvidia's chips were available?

What factors could lead to bishops establishing monastic armies?

How insert vertex in face?

Why is a mixture of two normally distributed variables only bimodal if their means differ by at least two times the common standard deviation?

Reference request: quantifier elimination test

Non-Chromatic Orchestral Instruments?

Strong Password Detection in Python

Estimates on number of topologies on a finite set

How to find the positions of replaced elements in a list

What's it called when the bad guy gets eaten?



Can you run PoE Cat6 alongside standard Cat6 cables?


Can Power Over Ethernet be daisy chained?How Can I Connect Two Sets of Computers Within My Home Office So There's No Cables On the Floor?Networking a POE VOIP phone and a non-POE router with one Ethernet portDaisy chaining PoE switches for IP security camera systemDo RJ45s need to be wired differently to enable POE (Power over ethernet)?Can I use Cat5/Cat6 instead of phone cablesDo Cat5e Or Cat6?What could cause Power over Ethernet not to work with a specific cable?S/FTP or U/FTP when wiring a house with CAT6a cabels for 10GbE?Location-dependent problems with PoE with confirmed-good components






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








13















I need PoE for some devices (CCTV cameras, WiFI Access Points) - can these wires be run in parallel with



  1. Cat6 cables going to non PoE devices (e.g. datapoints of PC)

  2. Cat6 HDBaseT Cables being used for HDMI over Cat6









share|improve this question

















  • 6





    Any specific reasons why you think they couldn't be?

    – grawity
    Jun 30 at 11:55






  • 5





    @grawity - In the US code doesn't let you run power and communications in same conduit. See here. Whether this applies to PoE I've no idea.

    – lx07
    Jun 30 at 12:21






  • 7





    If this is a legal question about the US code that applies to installations in buildings, I'd assume it is off-topic here.

    – dirkt
    Jun 30 at 12:24






  • 4





    It's primarily a question as to weather the PoE signal will cause any interference / or speed degradation to the other cables as it has power running through it as well. i.e. 4k over HdBaseT Cat6

    – Steve
    Jun 30 at 13:57






  • 4





    PoE signal? PoE is just plain DC voltage. It doesn't work the same way as AC power, and doesn't really constitute a "signal" in the way you're describing.

    – grawity
    Jun 30 at 20:15


















13















I need PoE for some devices (CCTV cameras, WiFI Access Points) - can these wires be run in parallel with



  1. Cat6 cables going to non PoE devices (e.g. datapoints of PC)

  2. Cat6 HDBaseT Cables being used for HDMI over Cat6









share|improve this question

















  • 6





    Any specific reasons why you think they couldn't be?

    – grawity
    Jun 30 at 11:55






  • 5





    @grawity - In the US code doesn't let you run power and communications in same conduit. See here. Whether this applies to PoE I've no idea.

    – lx07
    Jun 30 at 12:21






  • 7





    If this is a legal question about the US code that applies to installations in buildings, I'd assume it is off-topic here.

    – dirkt
    Jun 30 at 12:24






  • 4





    It's primarily a question as to weather the PoE signal will cause any interference / or speed degradation to the other cables as it has power running through it as well. i.e. 4k over HdBaseT Cat6

    – Steve
    Jun 30 at 13:57






  • 4





    PoE signal? PoE is just plain DC voltage. It doesn't work the same way as AC power, and doesn't really constitute a "signal" in the way you're describing.

    – grawity
    Jun 30 at 20:15














13












13








13








I need PoE for some devices (CCTV cameras, WiFI Access Points) - can these wires be run in parallel with



  1. Cat6 cables going to non PoE devices (e.g. datapoints of PC)

  2. Cat6 HDBaseT Cables being used for HDMI over Cat6









share|improve this question














I need PoE for some devices (CCTV cameras, WiFI Access Points) - can these wires be run in parallel with



  1. Cat6 cables going to non PoE devices (e.g. datapoints of PC)

  2. Cat6 HDBaseT Cables being used for HDMI over Cat6






cat6 cabling power-over-ethernet






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jun 30 at 10:31









SteveSteve

681 silver badge5 bronze badges




681 silver badge5 bronze badges







  • 6





    Any specific reasons why you think they couldn't be?

    – grawity
    Jun 30 at 11:55






  • 5





    @grawity - In the US code doesn't let you run power and communications in same conduit. See here. Whether this applies to PoE I've no idea.

    – lx07
    Jun 30 at 12:21






  • 7





    If this is a legal question about the US code that applies to installations in buildings, I'd assume it is off-topic here.

    – dirkt
    Jun 30 at 12:24






  • 4





    It's primarily a question as to weather the PoE signal will cause any interference / or speed degradation to the other cables as it has power running through it as well. i.e. 4k over HdBaseT Cat6

    – Steve
    Jun 30 at 13:57






  • 4





    PoE signal? PoE is just plain DC voltage. It doesn't work the same way as AC power, and doesn't really constitute a "signal" in the way you're describing.

    – grawity
    Jun 30 at 20:15













  • 6





    Any specific reasons why you think they couldn't be?

    – grawity
    Jun 30 at 11:55






  • 5





    @grawity - In the US code doesn't let you run power and communications in same conduit. See here. Whether this applies to PoE I've no idea.

    – lx07
    Jun 30 at 12:21






  • 7





    If this is a legal question about the US code that applies to installations in buildings, I'd assume it is off-topic here.

    – dirkt
    Jun 30 at 12:24






  • 4





    It's primarily a question as to weather the PoE signal will cause any interference / or speed degradation to the other cables as it has power running through it as well. i.e. 4k over HdBaseT Cat6

    – Steve
    Jun 30 at 13:57






  • 4





    PoE signal? PoE is just plain DC voltage. It doesn't work the same way as AC power, and doesn't really constitute a "signal" in the way you're describing.

    – grawity
    Jun 30 at 20:15








6




6





Any specific reasons why you think they couldn't be?

– grawity
Jun 30 at 11:55





Any specific reasons why you think they couldn't be?

– grawity
Jun 30 at 11:55




5




5





@grawity - In the US code doesn't let you run power and communications in same conduit. See here. Whether this applies to PoE I've no idea.

– lx07
Jun 30 at 12:21





@grawity - In the US code doesn't let you run power and communications in same conduit. See here. Whether this applies to PoE I've no idea.

– lx07
Jun 30 at 12:21




7




7





If this is a legal question about the US code that applies to installations in buildings, I'd assume it is off-topic here.

– dirkt
Jun 30 at 12:24





If this is a legal question about the US code that applies to installations in buildings, I'd assume it is off-topic here.

– dirkt
Jun 30 at 12:24




4




4





It's primarily a question as to weather the PoE signal will cause any interference / or speed degradation to the other cables as it has power running through it as well. i.e. 4k over HdBaseT Cat6

– Steve
Jun 30 at 13:57





It's primarily a question as to weather the PoE signal will cause any interference / or speed degradation to the other cables as it has power running through it as well. i.e. 4k over HdBaseT Cat6

– Steve
Jun 30 at 13:57




4




4





PoE signal? PoE is just plain DC voltage. It doesn't work the same way as AC power, and doesn't really constitute a "signal" in the way you're describing.

– grawity
Jun 30 at 20:15






PoE signal? PoE is just plain DC voltage. It doesn't work the same way as AC power, and doesn't really constitute a "signal" in the way you're describing.

– grawity
Jun 30 at 20:15











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















17














Can you run PoE Cat6 alongside standard Cat6 cables?



Yes. But you should be running Cat6A cable because of heat dissipation not interference (see later).



Notes:



  • Cat6 can be shielded or unshielded. Shielded will clearly be better.


  • Cat7 has an overall shield as well as individual shielding of every pair (so may be even more suitable).



Twisted pair cables are HIGHLY resistant to interference pickup. Furthermore, DC does not cause interference, since it is basically an unchanging current, so there's no change in magnetic fields from it to cause interference (other than when turned on, and off - and the twisted pair cables will reject that interference by design, anyway.)



I have many bundles of cables including POE cables in my work role. Interference is not a factor.




Source data wiring - Can PoE cause interference with neighboring non-PoE Ethernet cables? - Home Improvement Stack Exchange




You should be running Cat6A cable




In fact, a new PoE standard, IEEE 802.3bt, supports up to 100W of
power per cable.



But higher power levels running through a cable can cause performance
issues – namely by making the cable hotter. And when the cable gets
hotter, insertion loss increases. This escalates your chances of your
business experiencing a productivity killer – downtime – and may also
damage the cable itself.



You’re better off using Category 6A for a number of reasons we’re
going to cover here.




  1. Larger-Gauge Diameter



    A cable that offers a larger conductor diameter can reduce resistance
    and keep power waste to a minimum because it has a lower temperature
    increase compared to smaller-gauge Category 5e and Category 6 cables.
    This better performance will provide additional flexibility, including
    larger bundle sizes, closed installation conditions and higher ambient
    temperatures.



    For example, when comparing 23-gauge and 24-gauge cabling, there is a
    large variance in how power is handled. As much as 20% of the power
    through the cable can get “lost” in a 24-gauge Category 5e cable,
    leading to inefficiency.




  2. Less Power Loss



    Energy efficiency increases when structured cable maximizes the power
    running through it to waste as little as possible.



    As we mentioned above, losing nearly one-fifth of the total power in
    a 24-gauge Category 5e cable may seem like a lot of power loss – and
    it is. But doing the math will show you that the total dollar amount
    comes out to be only around $7 per year. The numbers start adding up;
    however, when you realize that it costs $7 per year per PoE device
    across your entire facility or campus – from surveillance cameras to
    wireless access points. Although it may seem like a small dollar
    amount when viewed out of context, power dissipation through a cable
    can ultimately lead to higher-than-necessary operating costs.



    It’s also important to keep in mind that the number of Power over
    Ethernet devices is only going to increase in your facility as you
    install more wireless access points to support things like BYOD (bring
    your own device). As a result, you’ll need more PoE cable – and there
    will be more opportunity for wasted energy.



    Less power is dissipated in a 23-gauge Category 6A cable, which means
    that more of the power being transferred through the cable is actually
    being used, improving energy efficiency and lowering operating costs.




  3. Tightly Packed Cables



    If your cables are tightly packed in their trays and pathways, the
    chance for heat increases because it doesn’t have a chance to
    dissipate away from the cable.



    Some Category 6A cable has enough insertion loss margin to handle the
    extra heat generated from tightly packed cables without impacting
    performance. (This doesn’t apply to all Category 6A cables. Even
    though they promise a 100 m solution, some cables may become an 85 m
    solution if the temperature increase is too high.)



    Belden 10GXS cable can handle the added heat while maintaining its
    full 100 m performance – and it’s the only Category 6A cable that can
    make this claim.





Source 3 Reasons Why Power over Ethernet Demands CAT 6A Cable




Further Reading



  • IEEE 802.3bt - The 100 Watt PoE Standard | Versa Technology

  • The IEEE 802.3bt standard’s impact on the expanding PoE marketplace | Cabling Installation & Maintenance





share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    Great answer. One nitpick though - the cost of cable loss figure seems unrealistic in practice as it assumes all poe devices are running at 100 watts all the time and they are all at the end of a long run. ( loss is related to distance of cable and amount of power drawn through it). Also, very few devices would draw anything like 100 watts. Most devices (phones , cameras for example) manage fine in under the 15 watts or so allowed by the 802.11af standard)

    – davidgo
    Jun 30 at 19:54






  • 2





    @davidgo Yeah, but cost is not the only criteria ... and if you replace those devices later with ones requiring more power you won't have to rerun new cables ...

    – DavidPostill
    Jun 30 at 20:08







  • 2





    100W is a lot of power. You could power 2 laptops with that! Typical devices like cameras only need 1/10th of that.

    – Navin
    Jul 1 at 5:39











  • It's worth mentioning that this answer 100% applies to 10/100 Poe Ethernet, However gigabit and beyond uses all the pairs. Both ends, client device and power supplying devices have transformers in the circuit, which does means changing current (pulsed dc.). Because of differential signal techniques it shouldn't interfere with other Ethernet cabling. Old analog phone lines (cat-3) or other older analog circuits should be installed 12" or more away from a bundle of Ethernet cables using the newer Poe.

    – Tim_Stewart
    Jul 1 at 13:55













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1454585%2fcan-you-run-poe-cat6-alongside-standard-cat6-cables%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









17














Can you run PoE Cat6 alongside standard Cat6 cables?



Yes. But you should be running Cat6A cable because of heat dissipation not interference (see later).



Notes:



  • Cat6 can be shielded or unshielded. Shielded will clearly be better.


  • Cat7 has an overall shield as well as individual shielding of every pair (so may be even more suitable).



Twisted pair cables are HIGHLY resistant to interference pickup. Furthermore, DC does not cause interference, since it is basically an unchanging current, so there's no change in magnetic fields from it to cause interference (other than when turned on, and off - and the twisted pair cables will reject that interference by design, anyway.)



I have many bundles of cables including POE cables in my work role. Interference is not a factor.




Source data wiring - Can PoE cause interference with neighboring non-PoE Ethernet cables? - Home Improvement Stack Exchange




You should be running Cat6A cable




In fact, a new PoE standard, IEEE 802.3bt, supports up to 100W of
power per cable.



But higher power levels running through a cable can cause performance
issues – namely by making the cable hotter. And when the cable gets
hotter, insertion loss increases. This escalates your chances of your
business experiencing a productivity killer – downtime – and may also
damage the cable itself.



You’re better off using Category 6A for a number of reasons we’re
going to cover here.




  1. Larger-Gauge Diameter



    A cable that offers a larger conductor diameter can reduce resistance
    and keep power waste to a minimum because it has a lower temperature
    increase compared to smaller-gauge Category 5e and Category 6 cables.
    This better performance will provide additional flexibility, including
    larger bundle sizes, closed installation conditions and higher ambient
    temperatures.



    For example, when comparing 23-gauge and 24-gauge cabling, there is a
    large variance in how power is handled. As much as 20% of the power
    through the cable can get “lost” in a 24-gauge Category 5e cable,
    leading to inefficiency.




  2. Less Power Loss



    Energy efficiency increases when structured cable maximizes the power
    running through it to waste as little as possible.



    As we mentioned above, losing nearly one-fifth of the total power in
    a 24-gauge Category 5e cable may seem like a lot of power loss – and
    it is. But doing the math will show you that the total dollar amount
    comes out to be only around $7 per year. The numbers start adding up;
    however, when you realize that it costs $7 per year per PoE device
    across your entire facility or campus – from surveillance cameras to
    wireless access points. Although it may seem like a small dollar
    amount when viewed out of context, power dissipation through a cable
    can ultimately lead to higher-than-necessary operating costs.



    It’s also important to keep in mind that the number of Power over
    Ethernet devices is only going to increase in your facility as you
    install more wireless access points to support things like BYOD (bring
    your own device). As a result, you’ll need more PoE cable – and there
    will be more opportunity for wasted energy.



    Less power is dissipated in a 23-gauge Category 6A cable, which means
    that more of the power being transferred through the cable is actually
    being used, improving energy efficiency and lowering operating costs.




  3. Tightly Packed Cables



    If your cables are tightly packed in their trays and pathways, the
    chance for heat increases because it doesn’t have a chance to
    dissipate away from the cable.



    Some Category 6A cable has enough insertion loss margin to handle the
    extra heat generated from tightly packed cables without impacting
    performance. (This doesn’t apply to all Category 6A cables. Even
    though they promise a 100 m solution, some cables may become an 85 m
    solution if the temperature increase is too high.)



    Belden 10GXS cable can handle the added heat while maintaining its
    full 100 m performance – and it’s the only Category 6A cable that can
    make this claim.





Source 3 Reasons Why Power over Ethernet Demands CAT 6A Cable




Further Reading



  • IEEE 802.3bt - The 100 Watt PoE Standard | Versa Technology

  • The IEEE 802.3bt standard’s impact on the expanding PoE marketplace | Cabling Installation & Maintenance





share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    Great answer. One nitpick though - the cost of cable loss figure seems unrealistic in practice as it assumes all poe devices are running at 100 watts all the time and they are all at the end of a long run. ( loss is related to distance of cable and amount of power drawn through it). Also, very few devices would draw anything like 100 watts. Most devices (phones , cameras for example) manage fine in under the 15 watts or so allowed by the 802.11af standard)

    – davidgo
    Jun 30 at 19:54






  • 2





    @davidgo Yeah, but cost is not the only criteria ... and if you replace those devices later with ones requiring more power you won't have to rerun new cables ...

    – DavidPostill
    Jun 30 at 20:08







  • 2





    100W is a lot of power. You could power 2 laptops with that! Typical devices like cameras only need 1/10th of that.

    – Navin
    Jul 1 at 5:39











  • It's worth mentioning that this answer 100% applies to 10/100 Poe Ethernet, However gigabit and beyond uses all the pairs. Both ends, client device and power supplying devices have transformers in the circuit, which does means changing current (pulsed dc.). Because of differential signal techniques it shouldn't interfere with other Ethernet cabling. Old analog phone lines (cat-3) or other older analog circuits should be installed 12" or more away from a bundle of Ethernet cables using the newer Poe.

    – Tim_Stewart
    Jul 1 at 13:55















17














Can you run PoE Cat6 alongside standard Cat6 cables?



Yes. But you should be running Cat6A cable because of heat dissipation not interference (see later).



Notes:



  • Cat6 can be shielded or unshielded. Shielded will clearly be better.


  • Cat7 has an overall shield as well as individual shielding of every pair (so may be even more suitable).



Twisted pair cables are HIGHLY resistant to interference pickup. Furthermore, DC does not cause interference, since it is basically an unchanging current, so there's no change in magnetic fields from it to cause interference (other than when turned on, and off - and the twisted pair cables will reject that interference by design, anyway.)



I have many bundles of cables including POE cables in my work role. Interference is not a factor.




Source data wiring - Can PoE cause interference with neighboring non-PoE Ethernet cables? - Home Improvement Stack Exchange




You should be running Cat6A cable




In fact, a new PoE standard, IEEE 802.3bt, supports up to 100W of
power per cable.



But higher power levels running through a cable can cause performance
issues – namely by making the cable hotter. And when the cable gets
hotter, insertion loss increases. This escalates your chances of your
business experiencing a productivity killer – downtime – and may also
damage the cable itself.



You’re better off using Category 6A for a number of reasons we’re
going to cover here.




  1. Larger-Gauge Diameter



    A cable that offers a larger conductor diameter can reduce resistance
    and keep power waste to a minimum because it has a lower temperature
    increase compared to smaller-gauge Category 5e and Category 6 cables.
    This better performance will provide additional flexibility, including
    larger bundle sizes, closed installation conditions and higher ambient
    temperatures.



    For example, when comparing 23-gauge and 24-gauge cabling, there is a
    large variance in how power is handled. As much as 20% of the power
    through the cable can get “lost” in a 24-gauge Category 5e cable,
    leading to inefficiency.




  2. Less Power Loss



    Energy efficiency increases when structured cable maximizes the power
    running through it to waste as little as possible.



    As we mentioned above, losing nearly one-fifth of the total power in
    a 24-gauge Category 5e cable may seem like a lot of power loss – and
    it is. But doing the math will show you that the total dollar amount
    comes out to be only around $7 per year. The numbers start adding up;
    however, when you realize that it costs $7 per year per PoE device
    across your entire facility or campus – from surveillance cameras to
    wireless access points. Although it may seem like a small dollar
    amount when viewed out of context, power dissipation through a cable
    can ultimately lead to higher-than-necessary operating costs.



    It’s also important to keep in mind that the number of Power over
    Ethernet devices is only going to increase in your facility as you
    install more wireless access points to support things like BYOD (bring
    your own device). As a result, you’ll need more PoE cable – and there
    will be more opportunity for wasted energy.



    Less power is dissipated in a 23-gauge Category 6A cable, which means
    that more of the power being transferred through the cable is actually
    being used, improving energy efficiency and lowering operating costs.




  3. Tightly Packed Cables



    If your cables are tightly packed in their trays and pathways, the
    chance for heat increases because it doesn’t have a chance to
    dissipate away from the cable.



    Some Category 6A cable has enough insertion loss margin to handle the
    extra heat generated from tightly packed cables without impacting
    performance. (This doesn’t apply to all Category 6A cables. Even
    though they promise a 100 m solution, some cables may become an 85 m
    solution if the temperature increase is too high.)



    Belden 10GXS cable can handle the added heat while maintaining its
    full 100 m performance – and it’s the only Category 6A cable that can
    make this claim.





Source 3 Reasons Why Power over Ethernet Demands CAT 6A Cable




Further Reading



  • IEEE 802.3bt - The 100 Watt PoE Standard | Versa Technology

  • The IEEE 802.3bt standard’s impact on the expanding PoE marketplace | Cabling Installation & Maintenance





share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    Great answer. One nitpick though - the cost of cable loss figure seems unrealistic in practice as it assumes all poe devices are running at 100 watts all the time and they are all at the end of a long run. ( loss is related to distance of cable and amount of power drawn through it). Also, very few devices would draw anything like 100 watts. Most devices (phones , cameras for example) manage fine in under the 15 watts or so allowed by the 802.11af standard)

    – davidgo
    Jun 30 at 19:54






  • 2





    @davidgo Yeah, but cost is not the only criteria ... and if you replace those devices later with ones requiring more power you won't have to rerun new cables ...

    – DavidPostill
    Jun 30 at 20:08







  • 2





    100W is a lot of power. You could power 2 laptops with that! Typical devices like cameras only need 1/10th of that.

    – Navin
    Jul 1 at 5:39











  • It's worth mentioning that this answer 100% applies to 10/100 Poe Ethernet, However gigabit and beyond uses all the pairs. Both ends, client device and power supplying devices have transformers in the circuit, which does means changing current (pulsed dc.). Because of differential signal techniques it shouldn't interfere with other Ethernet cabling. Old analog phone lines (cat-3) or other older analog circuits should be installed 12" or more away from a bundle of Ethernet cables using the newer Poe.

    – Tim_Stewart
    Jul 1 at 13:55













17












17








17







Can you run PoE Cat6 alongside standard Cat6 cables?



Yes. But you should be running Cat6A cable because of heat dissipation not interference (see later).



Notes:



  • Cat6 can be shielded or unshielded. Shielded will clearly be better.


  • Cat7 has an overall shield as well as individual shielding of every pair (so may be even more suitable).



Twisted pair cables are HIGHLY resistant to interference pickup. Furthermore, DC does not cause interference, since it is basically an unchanging current, so there's no change in magnetic fields from it to cause interference (other than when turned on, and off - and the twisted pair cables will reject that interference by design, anyway.)



I have many bundles of cables including POE cables in my work role. Interference is not a factor.




Source data wiring - Can PoE cause interference with neighboring non-PoE Ethernet cables? - Home Improvement Stack Exchange




You should be running Cat6A cable




In fact, a new PoE standard, IEEE 802.3bt, supports up to 100W of
power per cable.



But higher power levels running through a cable can cause performance
issues – namely by making the cable hotter. And when the cable gets
hotter, insertion loss increases. This escalates your chances of your
business experiencing a productivity killer – downtime – and may also
damage the cable itself.



You’re better off using Category 6A for a number of reasons we’re
going to cover here.




  1. Larger-Gauge Diameter



    A cable that offers a larger conductor diameter can reduce resistance
    and keep power waste to a minimum because it has a lower temperature
    increase compared to smaller-gauge Category 5e and Category 6 cables.
    This better performance will provide additional flexibility, including
    larger bundle sizes, closed installation conditions and higher ambient
    temperatures.



    For example, when comparing 23-gauge and 24-gauge cabling, there is a
    large variance in how power is handled. As much as 20% of the power
    through the cable can get “lost” in a 24-gauge Category 5e cable,
    leading to inefficiency.




  2. Less Power Loss



    Energy efficiency increases when structured cable maximizes the power
    running through it to waste as little as possible.



    As we mentioned above, losing nearly one-fifth of the total power in
    a 24-gauge Category 5e cable may seem like a lot of power loss – and
    it is. But doing the math will show you that the total dollar amount
    comes out to be only around $7 per year. The numbers start adding up;
    however, when you realize that it costs $7 per year per PoE device
    across your entire facility or campus – from surveillance cameras to
    wireless access points. Although it may seem like a small dollar
    amount when viewed out of context, power dissipation through a cable
    can ultimately lead to higher-than-necessary operating costs.



    It’s also important to keep in mind that the number of Power over
    Ethernet devices is only going to increase in your facility as you
    install more wireless access points to support things like BYOD (bring
    your own device). As a result, you’ll need more PoE cable – and there
    will be more opportunity for wasted energy.



    Less power is dissipated in a 23-gauge Category 6A cable, which means
    that more of the power being transferred through the cable is actually
    being used, improving energy efficiency and lowering operating costs.




  3. Tightly Packed Cables



    If your cables are tightly packed in their trays and pathways, the
    chance for heat increases because it doesn’t have a chance to
    dissipate away from the cable.



    Some Category 6A cable has enough insertion loss margin to handle the
    extra heat generated from tightly packed cables without impacting
    performance. (This doesn’t apply to all Category 6A cables. Even
    though they promise a 100 m solution, some cables may become an 85 m
    solution if the temperature increase is too high.)



    Belden 10GXS cable can handle the added heat while maintaining its
    full 100 m performance – and it’s the only Category 6A cable that can
    make this claim.





Source 3 Reasons Why Power over Ethernet Demands CAT 6A Cable




Further Reading



  • IEEE 802.3bt - The 100 Watt PoE Standard | Versa Technology

  • The IEEE 802.3bt standard’s impact on the expanding PoE marketplace | Cabling Installation & Maintenance





share|improve this answer















Can you run PoE Cat6 alongside standard Cat6 cables?



Yes. But you should be running Cat6A cable because of heat dissipation not interference (see later).



Notes:



  • Cat6 can be shielded or unshielded. Shielded will clearly be better.


  • Cat7 has an overall shield as well as individual shielding of every pair (so may be even more suitable).



Twisted pair cables are HIGHLY resistant to interference pickup. Furthermore, DC does not cause interference, since it is basically an unchanging current, so there's no change in magnetic fields from it to cause interference (other than when turned on, and off - and the twisted pair cables will reject that interference by design, anyway.)



I have many bundles of cables including POE cables in my work role. Interference is not a factor.




Source data wiring - Can PoE cause interference with neighboring non-PoE Ethernet cables? - Home Improvement Stack Exchange




You should be running Cat6A cable




In fact, a new PoE standard, IEEE 802.3bt, supports up to 100W of
power per cable.



But higher power levels running through a cable can cause performance
issues – namely by making the cable hotter. And when the cable gets
hotter, insertion loss increases. This escalates your chances of your
business experiencing a productivity killer – downtime – and may also
damage the cable itself.



You’re better off using Category 6A for a number of reasons we’re
going to cover here.




  1. Larger-Gauge Diameter



    A cable that offers a larger conductor diameter can reduce resistance
    and keep power waste to a minimum because it has a lower temperature
    increase compared to smaller-gauge Category 5e and Category 6 cables.
    This better performance will provide additional flexibility, including
    larger bundle sizes, closed installation conditions and higher ambient
    temperatures.



    For example, when comparing 23-gauge and 24-gauge cabling, there is a
    large variance in how power is handled. As much as 20% of the power
    through the cable can get “lost” in a 24-gauge Category 5e cable,
    leading to inefficiency.




  2. Less Power Loss



    Energy efficiency increases when structured cable maximizes the power
    running through it to waste as little as possible.



    As we mentioned above, losing nearly one-fifth of the total power in
    a 24-gauge Category 5e cable may seem like a lot of power loss – and
    it is. But doing the math will show you that the total dollar amount
    comes out to be only around $7 per year. The numbers start adding up;
    however, when you realize that it costs $7 per year per PoE device
    across your entire facility or campus – from surveillance cameras to
    wireless access points. Although it may seem like a small dollar
    amount when viewed out of context, power dissipation through a cable
    can ultimately lead to higher-than-necessary operating costs.



    It’s also important to keep in mind that the number of Power over
    Ethernet devices is only going to increase in your facility as you
    install more wireless access points to support things like BYOD (bring
    your own device). As a result, you’ll need more PoE cable – and there
    will be more opportunity for wasted energy.



    Less power is dissipated in a 23-gauge Category 6A cable, which means
    that more of the power being transferred through the cable is actually
    being used, improving energy efficiency and lowering operating costs.




  3. Tightly Packed Cables



    If your cables are tightly packed in their trays and pathways, the
    chance for heat increases because it doesn’t have a chance to
    dissipate away from the cable.



    Some Category 6A cable has enough insertion loss margin to handle the
    extra heat generated from tightly packed cables without impacting
    performance. (This doesn’t apply to all Category 6A cables. Even
    though they promise a 100 m solution, some cables may become an 85 m
    solution if the temperature increase is too high.)



    Belden 10GXS cable can handle the added heat while maintaining its
    full 100 m performance – and it’s the only Category 6A cable that can
    make this claim.





Source 3 Reasons Why Power over Ethernet Demands CAT 6A Cable




Further Reading



  • IEEE 802.3bt - The 100 Watt PoE Standard | Versa Technology

  • The IEEE 802.3bt standard’s impact on the expanding PoE marketplace | Cabling Installation & Maintenance






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jun 30 at 18:43

























answered Jun 30 at 18:08









DavidPostillDavidPostill

112k27 gold badges247 silver badges282 bronze badges




112k27 gold badges247 silver badges282 bronze badges







  • 4





    Great answer. One nitpick though - the cost of cable loss figure seems unrealistic in practice as it assumes all poe devices are running at 100 watts all the time and they are all at the end of a long run. ( loss is related to distance of cable and amount of power drawn through it). Also, very few devices would draw anything like 100 watts. Most devices (phones , cameras for example) manage fine in under the 15 watts or so allowed by the 802.11af standard)

    – davidgo
    Jun 30 at 19:54






  • 2





    @davidgo Yeah, but cost is not the only criteria ... and if you replace those devices later with ones requiring more power you won't have to rerun new cables ...

    – DavidPostill
    Jun 30 at 20:08







  • 2





    100W is a lot of power. You could power 2 laptops with that! Typical devices like cameras only need 1/10th of that.

    – Navin
    Jul 1 at 5:39











  • It's worth mentioning that this answer 100% applies to 10/100 Poe Ethernet, However gigabit and beyond uses all the pairs. Both ends, client device and power supplying devices have transformers in the circuit, which does means changing current (pulsed dc.). Because of differential signal techniques it shouldn't interfere with other Ethernet cabling. Old analog phone lines (cat-3) or other older analog circuits should be installed 12" or more away from a bundle of Ethernet cables using the newer Poe.

    – Tim_Stewart
    Jul 1 at 13:55












  • 4





    Great answer. One nitpick though - the cost of cable loss figure seems unrealistic in practice as it assumes all poe devices are running at 100 watts all the time and they are all at the end of a long run. ( loss is related to distance of cable and amount of power drawn through it). Also, very few devices would draw anything like 100 watts. Most devices (phones , cameras for example) manage fine in under the 15 watts or so allowed by the 802.11af standard)

    – davidgo
    Jun 30 at 19:54






  • 2





    @davidgo Yeah, but cost is not the only criteria ... and if you replace those devices later with ones requiring more power you won't have to rerun new cables ...

    – DavidPostill
    Jun 30 at 20:08







  • 2





    100W is a lot of power. You could power 2 laptops with that! Typical devices like cameras only need 1/10th of that.

    – Navin
    Jul 1 at 5:39











  • It's worth mentioning that this answer 100% applies to 10/100 Poe Ethernet, However gigabit and beyond uses all the pairs. Both ends, client device and power supplying devices have transformers in the circuit, which does means changing current (pulsed dc.). Because of differential signal techniques it shouldn't interfere with other Ethernet cabling. Old analog phone lines (cat-3) or other older analog circuits should be installed 12" or more away from a bundle of Ethernet cables using the newer Poe.

    – Tim_Stewart
    Jul 1 at 13:55







4




4





Great answer. One nitpick though - the cost of cable loss figure seems unrealistic in practice as it assumes all poe devices are running at 100 watts all the time and they are all at the end of a long run. ( loss is related to distance of cable and amount of power drawn through it). Also, very few devices would draw anything like 100 watts. Most devices (phones , cameras for example) manage fine in under the 15 watts or so allowed by the 802.11af standard)

– davidgo
Jun 30 at 19:54





Great answer. One nitpick though - the cost of cable loss figure seems unrealistic in practice as it assumes all poe devices are running at 100 watts all the time and they are all at the end of a long run. ( loss is related to distance of cable and amount of power drawn through it). Also, very few devices would draw anything like 100 watts. Most devices (phones , cameras for example) manage fine in under the 15 watts or so allowed by the 802.11af standard)

– davidgo
Jun 30 at 19:54




2




2





@davidgo Yeah, but cost is not the only criteria ... and if you replace those devices later with ones requiring more power you won't have to rerun new cables ...

– DavidPostill
Jun 30 at 20:08






@davidgo Yeah, but cost is not the only criteria ... and if you replace those devices later with ones requiring more power you won't have to rerun new cables ...

– DavidPostill
Jun 30 at 20:08





2




2





100W is a lot of power. You could power 2 laptops with that! Typical devices like cameras only need 1/10th of that.

– Navin
Jul 1 at 5:39





100W is a lot of power. You could power 2 laptops with that! Typical devices like cameras only need 1/10th of that.

– Navin
Jul 1 at 5:39













It's worth mentioning that this answer 100% applies to 10/100 Poe Ethernet, However gigabit and beyond uses all the pairs. Both ends, client device and power supplying devices have transformers in the circuit, which does means changing current (pulsed dc.). Because of differential signal techniques it shouldn't interfere with other Ethernet cabling. Old analog phone lines (cat-3) or other older analog circuits should be installed 12" or more away from a bundle of Ethernet cables using the newer Poe.

– Tim_Stewart
Jul 1 at 13:55





It's worth mentioning that this answer 100% applies to 10/100 Poe Ethernet, However gigabit and beyond uses all the pairs. Both ends, client device and power supplying devices have transformers in the circuit, which does means changing current (pulsed dc.). Because of differential signal techniques it shouldn't interfere with other Ethernet cabling. Old analog phone lines (cat-3) or other older analog circuits should be installed 12" or more away from a bundle of Ethernet cables using the newer Poe.

– Tim_Stewart
Jul 1 at 13:55

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1454585%2fcan-you-run-poe-cat6-alongside-standard-cat6-cables%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?