Does the Defensive Duelist feat stack with the AC calculation from the Warforged's Integrated Protection trait?Does the Defensive Duelist feat work when wielding ranged finesse weapons?How you calculate a warforged barbarian's AC?Is a Warforged considered to be wearing armor?Drawing and firing a hand crossbow whilst wielding a rapier in one hand (Fighter/Duelist/Crossbow expert)Do features that allow you to add twice your proficiency bonus, under some other name, stack with Expertise?Can a Warforged Envoy pick a land vehicle as his integrated tool?Does the Warforged Envoy's Integrated Tool feature give you a free tool?Is there any way to increase your proficiency bonus other than leveling up?How does the Weapon Champion's Favored Weapons feature interact with the Daisho Expertise feat?Does the Rock Gnome trait Artificer's Lore apply when you aren't proficient in History?
How to convert a file with several spaces into a tab-delimited file?
Why are Hobbits so fond of mushrooms?
Is the genetic term "polycistronic" still used in modern biology?
Why isn't pressure filtration popular compared to vacuum filtration?
Why did Harry Potter get a bedroom?
How to loop for 3 times in bash script when docker push fails?
For a hashing function like MD5, how similar can two plaintext strings be and still generate the same hash?
Machine learning and operations research projects
definition of "percentile"
Why does the U.S. tolerate foreign influence from Saudi Arabia and Israel on its domestic policies while not tolerating that from China or Russia?
Why didn't Nick Fury expose the villain's identity and plans?
During copyediting, journal disagrees about spelling of paper's main topic
What is this triple-transistor arrangement called?
Multiple DUI convictions 12 years ago. Do I disclose if I know they will do a background check?
What prevents someone from claiming to be the murderer in order to get the real murderer off?
Good resources for solving techniques (Metaheuristics, MILP, CP etc)
Is Trump personally blocking people on Twitter?
How many hours would it take to watch all of Doctor Who?
How do you glue a text to a point?
Credit score and financing new car
What explains 9 speed cassettes price differences?
Graduate student with abysmal English writing skills, how to help
Should disabled buttons give feedback when clicked?
Keep milk (or milk alternative) for a day without a fridge
Does the Defensive Duelist feat stack with the AC calculation from the Warforged's Integrated Protection trait?
Does the Defensive Duelist feat work when wielding ranged finesse weapons?How you calculate a warforged barbarian's AC?Is a Warforged considered to be wearing armor?Drawing and firing a hand crossbow whilst wielding a rapier in one hand (Fighter/Duelist/Crossbow expert)Do features that allow you to add twice your proficiency bonus, under some other name, stack with Expertise?Can a Warforged Envoy pick a land vehicle as his integrated tool?Does the Warforged Envoy's Integrated Tool feature give you a free tool?Is there any way to increase your proficiency bonus other than leveling up?How does the Weapon Champion's Favored Weapons feature interact with the Daisho Expertise feat?Does the Rock Gnome trait Artificer's Lore apply when you aren't proficient in History?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The warforged integrated protection uses your proficiency bonus as part of the calculation for your AC at all 3 levels if you are proficient in that armor type. The Defensive Duelist feat allows you to add your proficiency bonus to your AC as a reaction when wielding a finesse weapon and you are attacked. Now I know normally you can't add your proficiency to something more than once but I was wondering if this instance might be an exception because otherwise this feat is completely useless to warforged.
dnd-5e feats armor-class stacking warforged
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The warforged integrated protection uses your proficiency bonus as part of the calculation for your AC at all 3 levels if you are proficient in that armor type. The Defensive Duelist feat allows you to add your proficiency bonus to your AC as a reaction when wielding a finesse weapon and you are attacked. Now I know normally you can't add your proficiency to something more than once but I was wondering if this instance might be an exception because otherwise this feat is completely useless to warforged.
dnd-5e feats armor-class stacking warforged
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Hope you stick around! :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
Jul 3 at 0:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The warforged integrated protection uses your proficiency bonus as part of the calculation for your AC at all 3 levels if you are proficient in that armor type. The Defensive Duelist feat allows you to add your proficiency bonus to your AC as a reaction when wielding a finesse weapon and you are attacked. Now I know normally you can't add your proficiency to something more than once but I was wondering if this instance might be an exception because otherwise this feat is completely useless to warforged.
dnd-5e feats armor-class stacking warforged
$endgroup$
The warforged integrated protection uses your proficiency bonus as part of the calculation for your AC at all 3 levels if you are proficient in that armor type. The Defensive Duelist feat allows you to add your proficiency bonus to your AC as a reaction when wielding a finesse weapon and you are attacked. Now I know normally you can't add your proficiency to something more than once but I was wondering if this instance might be an exception because otherwise this feat is completely useless to warforged.
dnd-5e feats armor-class stacking warforged
dnd-5e feats armor-class stacking warforged
edited Jul 3 at 0:34
V2Blast♦
32.4k5 gold badges117 silver badges199 bronze badges
32.4k5 gold badges117 silver badges199 bronze badges
asked Jul 2 at 12:11
Daman159Daman159
612 bronze badges
612 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Hope you stick around! :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
Jul 3 at 0:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Hope you stick around! :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
Jul 3 at 0:33
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Hope you stick around! :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
Jul 3 at 0:33
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Hope you stick around! :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
Jul 3 at 0:33
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
RAW, they don't stack
From the basic rules on proficiency bonus (emphasis mine):
Your proficiency bonus can’t be added to a single die roll or other number more than once.
In this case, the number would be your AC for this attack. So, a warforged benefiting from Integrated Protection and using one of the modes that already add your proficiency bonus to AC would receive no benefit from the Defensive Duelist feat.
As suggested by Darth Pseudonym, note that there are times when the game intends you to apply the proficiency bonus more than once, such as with the Rogue's Expertise, but the language they use in those cases is "Your proficiency bonus is doubled", rather than "add it twice", so you are still adding it once, you just doubled it first.
Even in such circumstances, note what is reiterated further ahead on the proficiency bonus section:
If a circumstance suggests that your proficiency bonus applies more than once to the same roll, you still add it only once and multiply or divide it only once.
Unless a feature specifically overrides this general rule, proficiency can only be added once. Neither the feat or the warforged's Integrated Protection override this rule and therefore they do not stack.
It's not completely useless to a warforged
The Integrated Protection feature for warforged is simply one of the ways they have available to calculate their AC. If they gain other ways to calculate AC that do not add their proficiency bonus (being a Draconic Sorcerer, for example) they can use those instead and then benefit from the feat.
Being a bad feat is nothing new
A feat being bad for a character is not really a reason to make an exception. There's plenty of feats that are just strictly worse than an ability score increase for characters, notably things such as Moderately Armored on a character that is already proficient in medium armor and shields. With so many options available, this is hardly a reason to change the way a feat works.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This feat is completely useless to warforged
The prohibition on never adding proficiency more than once is absolute:
Your proficiency bonus can’t be added to a single die roll or other number more than once.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f150950%2fdoes-the-defensive-duelist-feat-stack-with-the-ac-calculation-from-the-warforged%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
RAW, they don't stack
From the basic rules on proficiency bonus (emphasis mine):
Your proficiency bonus can’t be added to a single die roll or other number more than once.
In this case, the number would be your AC for this attack. So, a warforged benefiting from Integrated Protection and using one of the modes that already add your proficiency bonus to AC would receive no benefit from the Defensive Duelist feat.
As suggested by Darth Pseudonym, note that there are times when the game intends you to apply the proficiency bonus more than once, such as with the Rogue's Expertise, but the language they use in those cases is "Your proficiency bonus is doubled", rather than "add it twice", so you are still adding it once, you just doubled it first.
Even in such circumstances, note what is reiterated further ahead on the proficiency bonus section:
If a circumstance suggests that your proficiency bonus applies more than once to the same roll, you still add it only once and multiply or divide it only once.
Unless a feature specifically overrides this general rule, proficiency can only be added once. Neither the feat or the warforged's Integrated Protection override this rule and therefore they do not stack.
It's not completely useless to a warforged
The Integrated Protection feature for warforged is simply one of the ways they have available to calculate their AC. If they gain other ways to calculate AC that do not add their proficiency bonus (being a Draconic Sorcerer, for example) they can use those instead and then benefit from the feat.
Being a bad feat is nothing new
A feat being bad for a character is not really a reason to make an exception. There's plenty of feats that are just strictly worse than an ability score increase for characters, notably things such as Moderately Armored on a character that is already proficient in medium armor and shields. With so many options available, this is hardly a reason to change the way a feat works.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
RAW, they don't stack
From the basic rules on proficiency bonus (emphasis mine):
Your proficiency bonus can’t be added to a single die roll or other number more than once.
In this case, the number would be your AC for this attack. So, a warforged benefiting from Integrated Protection and using one of the modes that already add your proficiency bonus to AC would receive no benefit from the Defensive Duelist feat.
As suggested by Darth Pseudonym, note that there are times when the game intends you to apply the proficiency bonus more than once, such as with the Rogue's Expertise, but the language they use in those cases is "Your proficiency bonus is doubled", rather than "add it twice", so you are still adding it once, you just doubled it first.
Even in such circumstances, note what is reiterated further ahead on the proficiency bonus section:
If a circumstance suggests that your proficiency bonus applies more than once to the same roll, you still add it only once and multiply or divide it only once.
Unless a feature specifically overrides this general rule, proficiency can only be added once. Neither the feat or the warforged's Integrated Protection override this rule and therefore they do not stack.
It's not completely useless to a warforged
The Integrated Protection feature for warforged is simply one of the ways they have available to calculate their AC. If they gain other ways to calculate AC that do not add their proficiency bonus (being a Draconic Sorcerer, for example) they can use those instead and then benefit from the feat.
Being a bad feat is nothing new
A feat being bad for a character is not really a reason to make an exception. There's plenty of feats that are just strictly worse than an ability score increase for characters, notably things such as Moderately Armored on a character that is already proficient in medium armor and shields. With so many options available, this is hardly a reason to change the way a feat works.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
RAW, they don't stack
From the basic rules on proficiency bonus (emphasis mine):
Your proficiency bonus can’t be added to a single die roll or other number more than once.
In this case, the number would be your AC for this attack. So, a warforged benefiting from Integrated Protection and using one of the modes that already add your proficiency bonus to AC would receive no benefit from the Defensive Duelist feat.
As suggested by Darth Pseudonym, note that there are times when the game intends you to apply the proficiency bonus more than once, such as with the Rogue's Expertise, but the language they use in those cases is "Your proficiency bonus is doubled", rather than "add it twice", so you are still adding it once, you just doubled it first.
Even in such circumstances, note what is reiterated further ahead on the proficiency bonus section:
If a circumstance suggests that your proficiency bonus applies more than once to the same roll, you still add it only once and multiply or divide it only once.
Unless a feature specifically overrides this general rule, proficiency can only be added once. Neither the feat or the warforged's Integrated Protection override this rule and therefore they do not stack.
It's not completely useless to a warforged
The Integrated Protection feature for warforged is simply one of the ways they have available to calculate their AC. If they gain other ways to calculate AC that do not add their proficiency bonus (being a Draconic Sorcerer, for example) they can use those instead and then benefit from the feat.
Being a bad feat is nothing new
A feat being bad for a character is not really a reason to make an exception. There's plenty of feats that are just strictly worse than an ability score increase for characters, notably things such as Moderately Armored on a character that is already proficient in medium armor and shields. With so many options available, this is hardly a reason to change the way a feat works.
$endgroup$
RAW, they don't stack
From the basic rules on proficiency bonus (emphasis mine):
Your proficiency bonus can’t be added to a single die roll or other number more than once.
In this case, the number would be your AC for this attack. So, a warforged benefiting from Integrated Protection and using one of the modes that already add your proficiency bonus to AC would receive no benefit from the Defensive Duelist feat.
As suggested by Darth Pseudonym, note that there are times when the game intends you to apply the proficiency bonus more than once, such as with the Rogue's Expertise, but the language they use in those cases is "Your proficiency bonus is doubled", rather than "add it twice", so you are still adding it once, you just doubled it first.
Even in such circumstances, note what is reiterated further ahead on the proficiency bonus section:
If a circumstance suggests that your proficiency bonus applies more than once to the same roll, you still add it only once and multiply or divide it only once.
Unless a feature specifically overrides this general rule, proficiency can only be added once. Neither the feat or the warforged's Integrated Protection override this rule and therefore they do not stack.
It's not completely useless to a warforged
The Integrated Protection feature for warforged is simply one of the ways they have available to calculate their AC. If they gain other ways to calculate AC that do not add their proficiency bonus (being a Draconic Sorcerer, for example) they can use those instead and then benefit from the feat.
Being a bad feat is nothing new
A feat being bad for a character is not really a reason to make an exception. There's plenty of feats that are just strictly worse than an ability score increase for characters, notably things such as Moderately Armored on a character that is already proficient in medium armor and shields. With so many options available, this is hardly a reason to change the way a feat works.
edited Jul 2 at 14:14
answered Jul 2 at 13:12
SdjzSdjz
18.4k6 gold badges92 silver badges145 bronze badges
18.4k6 gold badges92 silver badges145 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This feat is completely useless to warforged
The prohibition on never adding proficiency more than once is absolute:
Your proficiency bonus can’t be added to a single die roll or other number more than once.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This feat is completely useless to warforged
The prohibition on never adding proficiency more than once is absolute:
Your proficiency bonus can’t be added to a single die roll or other number more than once.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This feat is completely useless to warforged
The prohibition on never adding proficiency more than once is absolute:
Your proficiency bonus can’t be added to a single die roll or other number more than once.
$endgroup$
This feat is completely useless to warforged
The prohibition on never adding proficiency more than once is absolute:
Your proficiency bonus can’t be added to a single die roll or other number more than once.
answered Jul 2 at 13:14
Dale MDale M
118k26 gold badges312 silver badges524 bronze badges
118k26 gold badges312 silver badges524 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f150950%2fdoes-the-defensive-duelist-feat-stack-with-the-ac-calculation-from-the-warforged%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Hope you stick around! :)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
Jul 3 at 0:33