List comprehensions in Mathematica?Selectively Mapping over elements in a ListCreate a table with inline conditionsData Table Manipulation in MathematicaCheck every list element for appearanceFilling a matrix with a list of listsMatrix Multiplication after “Flatten”Table with List iterator return unpacked listFinding the two pairs in a list of pairs that minimize and maximize a given functionFinding roots of a ListReplacing specific elements of a nested list
RPI3B+: What are the four components below the HDMI connector called?
Why does this quadratic expression have three zeroes?
Print the last, middle and first character of your code
Should disabled buttons give feedback when clicked?
Matchmaker, Matchmaker, make me a match
Why were Er and Onan punished if they were under 20?
Cracking the Coding Interview — 1.5 One Away
How would my creatures handle groups without a strong concept of numbers?
Received a dinner invitation through my employer's email, is it ok to attend?
Why are all my yellow 2V/20mA LEDs burning out with 330k Ohm resistor?
For a hashing function like MD5, how similar can two plaintext strings be and still generate the same hash?
Integer Lists of Noah
Are there any sports for which the world's best player is female?
How is angular momentum conserved for the orbiting body if the centripetal force disappears?
Can the Mage Hand cantrip be used to trip an enemy who is running away?
Was I subtly told to resign?
Optimization terminology: "Exact" v. "Approximate"
Cops: The Hidden OEIS Substring
What is this triple-transistor arrangement called?
How do you glue a text to a point?
During copyediting, journal disagrees about spelling of paper's main topic
QGIS Zanzibar how to crop?
Storming Area 51
Why do players in the past play much longer tournaments than today's top players?
List comprehensions in Mathematica?
Selectively Mapping over elements in a ListCreate a table with inline conditionsData Table Manipulation in MathematicaCheck every list element for appearanceFilling a matrix with a list of listsMatrix Multiplication after “Flatten”Table with List iterator return unpacked listFinding the two pairs in a list of pairs that minimize and maximize a given functionFinding roots of a ListReplacing specific elements of a nested list
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I'm looking for an implementation of list comprehensions in Python (nested for-in
statement with destructuring and conditionals). Here's an example:
matrix=[['a','b'],['c','d']]
flat=[(el,i,j) for (i, array) in enumerate(matrix) for (j, el) in enumerate(array) if i!=j]
print(flat)
Now, anyone could write this with a table or loop, but that's not what I'm looking for.
list-manipulation python
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm looking for an implementation of list comprehensions in Python (nested for-in
statement with destructuring and conditionals). Here's an example:
matrix=[['a','b'],['c','d']]
flat=[(el,i,j) for (i, array) in enumerate(matrix) for (j, el) in enumerate(array) if i!=j]
print(flat)
Now, anyone could write this with a table or loop, but that's not what I'm looking for.
list-manipulation python
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
I don't understand what the Python code does and, frankly, I don't really think you are providing enough info here. Can you explain what you want to do, or perhaps provide the corresponding table or loop MMA code that you mention? What functionality are you looking for exactly?
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Jul 2 at 17:51
$begingroup$
That kind of functionality is provided byDataset
.
$endgroup$
– Anton Antonov
Jul 2 at 18:11
1
$begingroup$
@MarcoB This is probably the best/most-used feature of python. I'm just looking for an implementation of something equally useful in mma.
$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jul 2 at 20:08
1
$begingroup$
Well, one might say that this is not a python site, and make allowances to encourage folks who know Mathematica well, which is what is needed for a good answer, to try to help. After all, it's not hard to summarize the functionality in the question. Further, re "that's not what I'm looking for": what are you looking for? The iterators in python don't have exact equivalents in M, however closeMapIndexed
is tofor (i, array) in enumerate(matrix)
. And since you have to use a nested loop in python, how do you expect not to have to use a loop in M?
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Jul 2 at 22:59
$begingroup$
Why not justMapIndexed
with a level spec of2
and a conditionalNothing
and then callFlatten[#, 1]
on that? Seems to me to be the easiest way.
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm looking for an implementation of list comprehensions in Python (nested for-in
statement with destructuring and conditionals). Here's an example:
matrix=[['a','b'],['c','d']]
flat=[(el,i,j) for (i, array) in enumerate(matrix) for (j, el) in enumerate(array) if i!=j]
print(flat)
Now, anyone could write this with a table or loop, but that's not what I'm looking for.
list-manipulation python
$endgroup$
I'm looking for an implementation of list comprehensions in Python (nested for-in
statement with destructuring and conditionals). Here's an example:
matrix=[['a','b'],['c','d']]
flat=[(el,i,j) for (i, array) in enumerate(matrix) for (j, el) in enumerate(array) if i!=j]
print(flat)
Now, anyone could write this with a table or loop, but that's not what I'm looking for.
list-manipulation python
list-manipulation python
asked Jul 2 at 17:43
M.R.M.R.
15.6k5 gold badges61 silver badges200 bronze badges
15.6k5 gold badges61 silver badges200 bronze badges
5
$begingroup$
I don't understand what the Python code does and, frankly, I don't really think you are providing enough info here. Can you explain what you want to do, or perhaps provide the corresponding table or loop MMA code that you mention? What functionality are you looking for exactly?
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Jul 2 at 17:51
$begingroup$
That kind of functionality is provided byDataset
.
$endgroup$
– Anton Antonov
Jul 2 at 18:11
1
$begingroup$
@MarcoB This is probably the best/most-used feature of python. I'm just looking for an implementation of something equally useful in mma.
$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jul 2 at 20:08
1
$begingroup$
Well, one might say that this is not a python site, and make allowances to encourage folks who know Mathematica well, which is what is needed for a good answer, to try to help. After all, it's not hard to summarize the functionality in the question. Further, re "that's not what I'm looking for": what are you looking for? The iterators in python don't have exact equivalents in M, however closeMapIndexed
is tofor (i, array) in enumerate(matrix)
. And since you have to use a nested loop in python, how do you expect not to have to use a loop in M?
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Jul 2 at 22:59
$begingroup$
Why not justMapIndexed
with a level spec of2
and a conditionalNothing
and then callFlatten[#, 1]
on that? Seems to me to be the easiest way.
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:32
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
I don't understand what the Python code does and, frankly, I don't really think you are providing enough info here. Can you explain what you want to do, or perhaps provide the corresponding table or loop MMA code that you mention? What functionality are you looking for exactly?
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Jul 2 at 17:51
$begingroup$
That kind of functionality is provided byDataset
.
$endgroup$
– Anton Antonov
Jul 2 at 18:11
1
$begingroup$
@MarcoB This is probably the best/most-used feature of python. I'm just looking for an implementation of something equally useful in mma.
$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jul 2 at 20:08
1
$begingroup$
Well, one might say that this is not a python site, and make allowances to encourage folks who know Mathematica well, which is what is needed for a good answer, to try to help. After all, it's not hard to summarize the functionality in the question. Further, re "that's not what I'm looking for": what are you looking for? The iterators in python don't have exact equivalents in M, however closeMapIndexed
is tofor (i, array) in enumerate(matrix)
. And since you have to use a nested loop in python, how do you expect not to have to use a loop in M?
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Jul 2 at 22:59
$begingroup$
Why not justMapIndexed
with a level spec of2
and a conditionalNothing
and then callFlatten[#, 1]
on that? Seems to me to be the easiest way.
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:32
5
5
$begingroup$
I don't understand what the Python code does and, frankly, I don't really think you are providing enough info here. Can you explain what you want to do, or perhaps provide the corresponding table or loop MMA code that you mention? What functionality are you looking for exactly?
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Jul 2 at 17:51
$begingroup$
I don't understand what the Python code does and, frankly, I don't really think you are providing enough info here. Can you explain what you want to do, or perhaps provide the corresponding table or loop MMA code that you mention? What functionality are you looking for exactly?
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Jul 2 at 17:51
$begingroup$
That kind of functionality is provided by
Dataset
.$endgroup$
– Anton Antonov
Jul 2 at 18:11
$begingroup$
That kind of functionality is provided by
Dataset
.$endgroup$
– Anton Antonov
Jul 2 at 18:11
1
1
$begingroup$
@MarcoB This is probably the best/most-used feature of python. I'm just looking for an implementation of something equally useful in mma.
$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jul 2 at 20:08
$begingroup$
@MarcoB This is probably the best/most-used feature of python. I'm just looking for an implementation of something equally useful in mma.
$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jul 2 at 20:08
1
1
$begingroup$
Well, one might say that this is not a python site, and make allowances to encourage folks who know Mathematica well, which is what is needed for a good answer, to try to help. After all, it's not hard to summarize the functionality in the question. Further, re "that's not what I'm looking for": what are you looking for? The iterators in python don't have exact equivalents in M, however close
MapIndexed
is to for (i, array) in enumerate(matrix)
. And since you have to use a nested loop in python, how do you expect not to have to use a loop in M?$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Jul 2 at 22:59
$begingroup$
Well, one might say that this is not a python site, and make allowances to encourage folks who know Mathematica well, which is what is needed for a good answer, to try to help. After all, it's not hard to summarize the functionality in the question. Further, re "that's not what I'm looking for": what are you looking for? The iterators in python don't have exact equivalents in M, however close
MapIndexed
is to for (i, array) in enumerate(matrix)
. And since you have to use a nested loop in python, how do you expect not to have to use a loop in M?$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Jul 2 at 22:59
$begingroup$
Why not just
MapIndexed
with a level spec of 2
and a conditional Nothing
and then call Flatten[#, 1]
on that? Seems to me to be the easiest way.$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:32
$begingroup$
Why not just
MapIndexed
with a level spec of 2
and a conditional Nothing
and then call Flatten[#, 1]
on that? Seems to me to be the easiest way.$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:32
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
IMO, Mathematica's functional operators more than cover the use cases for list comprehensions in Python. There are a couple of different list comprehension syntaxes which are covered by a couple of different functions in Mathematica:
[f(v) for v in values]
is covered by Map[f, values]
[f(v, i) for v in enumerate(values)]
is covered by MapIndexed[f, values]
[f(v1, v2) for v1, v2 in zip(values1, values2)]
is covered by MapThread[f, values1, values2]
The syntax [f(v) for v in values if v == x]
is typically accomplished with Select
or Pick
, as in Select[f /@ values, # == x &]
.
Python list comprehensions can also be used for nested loops:
[f(x, y) for x in xvalues
for y in yvalues]
This is equivalent to Flatten@Outer[f, xvalues, yvalues]
.
Mathematica's functionality in this area is much better than Python's list comprehension. Mathematica's functions are more readable and more flexible, for example in cases where you need to use the level argument.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
f/@Select[values,#==x&]
matches more closely
$endgroup$
– Philip Maymin
Jul 3 at 11:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Something like this?
matrix = "a", "b", "c", "d";
allflat = Flatten[MapIndexed[List, matrix, 2], 1]
(* "a", 1, 1, "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1, "d", 2, 2 *)
flat = Select[allflat, Apply[Unequal]@*Last]
(* "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1 *)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You can also useNothing
and a condition to obviate the need for theSelect
after the fact.
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A straightforward translation of a general list comprehension, suggested by various Python tutorials, even if not the most efficient way (see for instance @Roman's answer), is to append each item to a list:
Module[res = ,
MapIndexed[ (* use Do[], Map[], or MapIndexed[] to implement the iterable *)
Function[array, i,
MapIndexed[
Function[el, j,
If[i != j, (* if condition *)
AppendTo[res, el, First@i, First@j]] (* add to list *)
],
array
]
],
matrix
];
res
]
Reap
and Sow
might be the closest thing in Mathematica to a list comprehension, and effectively implements the above approach.
Reap[
MapIndexed[
Function[array, i,
MapIndexed[
Function[el, j,
If[i != j, Sow[el, First@i, First@j]]
],
array
]
],
matrix
]
][[2, 1]]
And Reap
-Sow
allows multiple list comprehensions simultaneously with the second tag argument.
Note: Sometimes one can use Table[]
with If[condition, x, Nothing]
to implement [x for x in list if condition]
. But implementing nested iterations with Table[]
, such as in the OP's example, would result in nested lists instead of a flat list. They could be flattened. For the OP's example:
Flatten[
Table[
With[array = matrix[[i]],
Table[
With[el = array[[j]],
If[i != j, el, i, j, Nothing]
],
j, Length@array
]
],
i, Length@matrix
],
1
]
Note that with Table[]
, Do[]
, and Map[]
you can only have one item, either the index j
or the element el
. If you get the index, you can extract the element as above.. To get both at once, you would have to use MapIndexed
. Note also that instead of Table[]
, you can use MapIndexed
at level 2, as in @Roman's answer, which produces a nested, non-flat, result. Using MapIndexed[]
instead of Table[]
above gives us the following solution:
Flatten[
MapIndexed[
If[Unequal @@ #2, Flatten[##], Nothing] &,
matrix,
2],
1]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
...an implementation of list comprehensions in Python
We could implement Python (poorly) in Mathematica:
Needs@"GeneralUtilities`";
ClearAll[for];
SetAttributes[for, HoldAll];
for[x_ ∈ iterator_, body_] /; MatchQ[iterator, _Iterator] :=
Module[i, iter = iterator, tag,
Hold[x] /. Hold[v___] | Hold[v___] :>
Block[v, (* Blocks variables in x *)
Reap[
While[
i = Read[iter];
i =!= IteratorExhausted,
x = i;
Sow[body, tag]
],
tag][[2, 1]]
]];
enumerate[list_List] := NewIterator[
enumerate,
i = 0, max = Length@list,
If[i++ < max, i, list[[i]], IteratorExhausted]];
ClearAll[lc];
SetAttributes[lc, HoldAll];
lc[x_, iterFN_] := Module[tag,
Reap[iterFN[Unevaluated@Sow[x, tag]], tag][[2, 1]]
];
Now the syntax is pretty close to Python's:
[
(el,i,j)
for (i, array) in enumerate(matrix) for (j, el) in enumerate(array) if i!=j
]
lc[
el, i, j,
for[i, array ∈ enumerate@matrix, for[j, el ∈ enumerate@array, If[i != j, #]]] &
]
(* "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1 *)
One could even alter enumerate[]
to index arrays from 0
instead of 1
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201407%2flist-comprehensions-in-mathematica%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
IMO, Mathematica's functional operators more than cover the use cases for list comprehensions in Python. There are a couple of different list comprehension syntaxes which are covered by a couple of different functions in Mathematica:
[f(v) for v in values]
is covered by Map[f, values]
[f(v, i) for v in enumerate(values)]
is covered by MapIndexed[f, values]
[f(v1, v2) for v1, v2 in zip(values1, values2)]
is covered by MapThread[f, values1, values2]
The syntax [f(v) for v in values if v == x]
is typically accomplished with Select
or Pick
, as in Select[f /@ values, # == x &]
.
Python list comprehensions can also be used for nested loops:
[f(x, y) for x in xvalues
for y in yvalues]
This is equivalent to Flatten@Outer[f, xvalues, yvalues]
.
Mathematica's functionality in this area is much better than Python's list comprehension. Mathematica's functions are more readable and more flexible, for example in cases where you need to use the level argument.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
f/@Select[values,#==x&]
matches more closely
$endgroup$
– Philip Maymin
Jul 3 at 11:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
IMO, Mathematica's functional operators more than cover the use cases for list comprehensions in Python. There are a couple of different list comprehension syntaxes which are covered by a couple of different functions in Mathematica:
[f(v) for v in values]
is covered by Map[f, values]
[f(v, i) for v in enumerate(values)]
is covered by MapIndexed[f, values]
[f(v1, v2) for v1, v2 in zip(values1, values2)]
is covered by MapThread[f, values1, values2]
The syntax [f(v) for v in values if v == x]
is typically accomplished with Select
or Pick
, as in Select[f /@ values, # == x &]
.
Python list comprehensions can also be used for nested loops:
[f(x, y) for x in xvalues
for y in yvalues]
This is equivalent to Flatten@Outer[f, xvalues, yvalues]
.
Mathematica's functionality in this area is much better than Python's list comprehension. Mathematica's functions are more readable and more flexible, for example in cases where you need to use the level argument.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
f/@Select[values,#==x&]
matches more closely
$endgroup$
– Philip Maymin
Jul 3 at 11:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
IMO, Mathematica's functional operators more than cover the use cases for list comprehensions in Python. There are a couple of different list comprehension syntaxes which are covered by a couple of different functions in Mathematica:
[f(v) for v in values]
is covered by Map[f, values]
[f(v, i) for v in enumerate(values)]
is covered by MapIndexed[f, values]
[f(v1, v2) for v1, v2 in zip(values1, values2)]
is covered by MapThread[f, values1, values2]
The syntax [f(v) for v in values if v == x]
is typically accomplished with Select
or Pick
, as in Select[f /@ values, # == x &]
.
Python list comprehensions can also be used for nested loops:
[f(x, y) for x in xvalues
for y in yvalues]
This is equivalent to Flatten@Outer[f, xvalues, yvalues]
.
Mathematica's functionality in this area is much better than Python's list comprehension. Mathematica's functions are more readable and more flexible, for example in cases where you need to use the level argument.
$endgroup$
IMO, Mathematica's functional operators more than cover the use cases for list comprehensions in Python. There are a couple of different list comprehension syntaxes which are covered by a couple of different functions in Mathematica:
[f(v) for v in values]
is covered by Map[f, values]
[f(v, i) for v in enumerate(values)]
is covered by MapIndexed[f, values]
[f(v1, v2) for v1, v2 in zip(values1, values2)]
is covered by MapThread[f, values1, values2]
The syntax [f(v) for v in values if v == x]
is typically accomplished with Select
or Pick
, as in Select[f /@ values, # == x &]
.
Python list comprehensions can also be used for nested loops:
[f(x, y) for x in xvalues
for y in yvalues]
This is equivalent to Flatten@Outer[f, xvalues, yvalues]
.
Mathematica's functionality in this area is much better than Python's list comprehension. Mathematica's functions are more readable and more flexible, for example in cases where you need to use the level argument.
answered Jul 3 at 3:18
C. E.C. E.
53k3 gold badges102 silver badges210 bronze badges
53k3 gold badges102 silver badges210 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
f/@Select[values,#==x&]
matches more closely
$endgroup$
– Philip Maymin
Jul 3 at 11:06
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
f/@Select[values,#==x&]
matches more closely
$endgroup$
– Philip Maymin
Jul 3 at 11:06
2
2
$begingroup$
f/@Select[values,#==x&]
matches more closely$endgroup$
– Philip Maymin
Jul 3 at 11:06
$begingroup$
f/@Select[values,#==x&]
matches more closely$endgroup$
– Philip Maymin
Jul 3 at 11:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Something like this?
matrix = "a", "b", "c", "d";
allflat = Flatten[MapIndexed[List, matrix, 2], 1]
(* "a", 1, 1, "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1, "d", 2, 2 *)
flat = Select[allflat, Apply[Unequal]@*Last]
(* "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1 *)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You can also useNothing
and a condition to obviate the need for theSelect
after the fact.
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Something like this?
matrix = "a", "b", "c", "d";
allflat = Flatten[MapIndexed[List, matrix, 2], 1]
(* "a", 1, 1, "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1, "d", 2, 2 *)
flat = Select[allflat, Apply[Unequal]@*Last]
(* "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1 *)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You can also useNothing
and a condition to obviate the need for theSelect
after the fact.
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Something like this?
matrix = "a", "b", "c", "d";
allflat = Flatten[MapIndexed[List, matrix, 2], 1]
(* "a", 1, 1, "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1, "d", 2, 2 *)
flat = Select[allflat, Apply[Unequal]@*Last]
(* "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1 *)
$endgroup$
Something like this?
matrix = "a", "b", "c", "d";
allflat = Flatten[MapIndexed[List, matrix, 2], 1]
(* "a", 1, 1, "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1, "d", 2, 2 *)
flat = Select[allflat, Apply[Unequal]@*Last]
(* "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1 *)
edited Jul 2 at 18:17
answered Jul 2 at 18:07
RomanRoman
13.1k1 gold badge19 silver badges51 bronze badges
13.1k1 gold badge19 silver badges51 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
You can also useNothing
and a condition to obviate the need for theSelect
after the fact.
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:33
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You can also useNothing
and a condition to obviate the need for theSelect
after the fact.
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:33
1
1
$begingroup$
You can also use
Nothing
and a condition to obviate the need for the Select
after the fact.$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:33
$begingroup$
You can also use
Nothing
and a condition to obviate the need for the Select
after the fact.$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A straightforward translation of a general list comprehension, suggested by various Python tutorials, even if not the most efficient way (see for instance @Roman's answer), is to append each item to a list:
Module[res = ,
MapIndexed[ (* use Do[], Map[], or MapIndexed[] to implement the iterable *)
Function[array, i,
MapIndexed[
Function[el, j,
If[i != j, (* if condition *)
AppendTo[res, el, First@i, First@j]] (* add to list *)
],
array
]
],
matrix
];
res
]
Reap
and Sow
might be the closest thing in Mathematica to a list comprehension, and effectively implements the above approach.
Reap[
MapIndexed[
Function[array, i,
MapIndexed[
Function[el, j,
If[i != j, Sow[el, First@i, First@j]]
],
array
]
],
matrix
]
][[2, 1]]
And Reap
-Sow
allows multiple list comprehensions simultaneously with the second tag argument.
Note: Sometimes one can use Table[]
with If[condition, x, Nothing]
to implement [x for x in list if condition]
. But implementing nested iterations with Table[]
, such as in the OP's example, would result in nested lists instead of a flat list. They could be flattened. For the OP's example:
Flatten[
Table[
With[array = matrix[[i]],
Table[
With[el = array[[j]],
If[i != j, el, i, j, Nothing]
],
j, Length@array
]
],
i, Length@matrix
],
1
]
Note that with Table[]
, Do[]
, and Map[]
you can only have one item, either the index j
or the element el
. If you get the index, you can extract the element as above.. To get both at once, you would have to use MapIndexed
. Note also that instead of Table[]
, you can use MapIndexed
at level 2, as in @Roman's answer, which produces a nested, non-flat, result. Using MapIndexed[]
instead of Table[]
above gives us the following solution:
Flatten[
MapIndexed[
If[Unequal @@ #2, Flatten[##], Nothing] &,
matrix,
2],
1]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A straightforward translation of a general list comprehension, suggested by various Python tutorials, even if not the most efficient way (see for instance @Roman's answer), is to append each item to a list:
Module[res = ,
MapIndexed[ (* use Do[], Map[], or MapIndexed[] to implement the iterable *)
Function[array, i,
MapIndexed[
Function[el, j,
If[i != j, (* if condition *)
AppendTo[res, el, First@i, First@j]] (* add to list *)
],
array
]
],
matrix
];
res
]
Reap
and Sow
might be the closest thing in Mathematica to a list comprehension, and effectively implements the above approach.
Reap[
MapIndexed[
Function[array, i,
MapIndexed[
Function[el, j,
If[i != j, Sow[el, First@i, First@j]]
],
array
]
],
matrix
]
][[2, 1]]
And Reap
-Sow
allows multiple list comprehensions simultaneously with the second tag argument.
Note: Sometimes one can use Table[]
with If[condition, x, Nothing]
to implement [x for x in list if condition]
. But implementing nested iterations with Table[]
, such as in the OP's example, would result in nested lists instead of a flat list. They could be flattened. For the OP's example:
Flatten[
Table[
With[array = matrix[[i]],
Table[
With[el = array[[j]],
If[i != j, el, i, j, Nothing]
],
j, Length@array
]
],
i, Length@matrix
],
1
]
Note that with Table[]
, Do[]
, and Map[]
you can only have one item, either the index j
or the element el
. If you get the index, you can extract the element as above.. To get both at once, you would have to use MapIndexed
. Note also that instead of Table[]
, you can use MapIndexed
at level 2, as in @Roman's answer, which produces a nested, non-flat, result. Using MapIndexed[]
instead of Table[]
above gives us the following solution:
Flatten[
MapIndexed[
If[Unequal @@ #2, Flatten[##], Nothing] &,
matrix,
2],
1]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A straightforward translation of a general list comprehension, suggested by various Python tutorials, even if not the most efficient way (see for instance @Roman's answer), is to append each item to a list:
Module[res = ,
MapIndexed[ (* use Do[], Map[], or MapIndexed[] to implement the iterable *)
Function[array, i,
MapIndexed[
Function[el, j,
If[i != j, (* if condition *)
AppendTo[res, el, First@i, First@j]] (* add to list *)
],
array
]
],
matrix
];
res
]
Reap
and Sow
might be the closest thing in Mathematica to a list comprehension, and effectively implements the above approach.
Reap[
MapIndexed[
Function[array, i,
MapIndexed[
Function[el, j,
If[i != j, Sow[el, First@i, First@j]]
],
array
]
],
matrix
]
][[2, 1]]
And Reap
-Sow
allows multiple list comprehensions simultaneously with the second tag argument.
Note: Sometimes one can use Table[]
with If[condition, x, Nothing]
to implement [x for x in list if condition]
. But implementing nested iterations with Table[]
, such as in the OP's example, would result in nested lists instead of a flat list. They could be flattened. For the OP's example:
Flatten[
Table[
With[array = matrix[[i]],
Table[
With[el = array[[j]],
If[i != j, el, i, j, Nothing]
],
j, Length@array
]
],
i, Length@matrix
],
1
]
Note that with Table[]
, Do[]
, and Map[]
you can only have one item, either the index j
or the element el
. If you get the index, you can extract the element as above.. To get both at once, you would have to use MapIndexed
. Note also that instead of Table[]
, you can use MapIndexed
at level 2, as in @Roman's answer, which produces a nested, non-flat, result. Using MapIndexed[]
instead of Table[]
above gives us the following solution:
Flatten[
MapIndexed[
If[Unequal @@ #2, Flatten[##], Nothing] &,
matrix,
2],
1]
$endgroup$
A straightforward translation of a general list comprehension, suggested by various Python tutorials, even if not the most efficient way (see for instance @Roman's answer), is to append each item to a list:
Module[res = ,
MapIndexed[ (* use Do[], Map[], or MapIndexed[] to implement the iterable *)
Function[array, i,
MapIndexed[
Function[el, j,
If[i != j, (* if condition *)
AppendTo[res, el, First@i, First@j]] (* add to list *)
],
array
]
],
matrix
];
res
]
Reap
and Sow
might be the closest thing in Mathematica to a list comprehension, and effectively implements the above approach.
Reap[
MapIndexed[
Function[array, i,
MapIndexed[
Function[el, j,
If[i != j, Sow[el, First@i, First@j]]
],
array
]
],
matrix
]
][[2, 1]]
And Reap
-Sow
allows multiple list comprehensions simultaneously with the second tag argument.
Note: Sometimes one can use Table[]
with If[condition, x, Nothing]
to implement [x for x in list if condition]
. But implementing nested iterations with Table[]
, such as in the OP's example, would result in nested lists instead of a flat list. They could be flattened. For the OP's example:
Flatten[
Table[
With[array = matrix[[i]],
Table[
With[el = array[[j]],
If[i != j, el, i, j, Nothing]
],
j, Length@array
]
],
i, Length@matrix
],
1
]
Note that with Table[]
, Do[]
, and Map[]
you can only have one item, either the index j
or the element el
. If you get the index, you can extract the element as above.. To get both at once, you would have to use MapIndexed
. Note also that instead of Table[]
, you can use MapIndexed
at level 2, as in @Roman's answer, which produces a nested, non-flat, result. Using MapIndexed[]
instead of Table[]
above gives us the following solution:
Flatten[
MapIndexed[
If[Unequal @@ #2, Flatten[##], Nothing] &,
matrix,
2],
1]
edited Jul 2 at 21:53
answered Jul 2 at 19:07
Michael E2Michael E2
155k12 gold badges213 silver badges502 bronze badges
155k12 gold badges213 silver badges502 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
...an implementation of list comprehensions in Python
We could implement Python (poorly) in Mathematica:
Needs@"GeneralUtilities`";
ClearAll[for];
SetAttributes[for, HoldAll];
for[x_ ∈ iterator_, body_] /; MatchQ[iterator, _Iterator] :=
Module[i, iter = iterator, tag,
Hold[x] /. Hold[v___] | Hold[v___] :>
Block[v, (* Blocks variables in x *)
Reap[
While[
i = Read[iter];
i =!= IteratorExhausted,
x = i;
Sow[body, tag]
],
tag][[2, 1]]
]];
enumerate[list_List] := NewIterator[
enumerate,
i = 0, max = Length@list,
If[i++ < max, i, list[[i]], IteratorExhausted]];
ClearAll[lc];
SetAttributes[lc, HoldAll];
lc[x_, iterFN_] := Module[tag,
Reap[iterFN[Unevaluated@Sow[x, tag]], tag][[2, 1]]
];
Now the syntax is pretty close to Python's:
[
(el,i,j)
for (i, array) in enumerate(matrix) for (j, el) in enumerate(array) if i!=j
]
lc[
el, i, j,
for[i, array ∈ enumerate@matrix, for[j, el ∈ enumerate@array, If[i != j, #]]] &
]
(* "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1 *)
One could even alter enumerate[]
to index arrays from 0
instead of 1
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
...an implementation of list comprehensions in Python
We could implement Python (poorly) in Mathematica:
Needs@"GeneralUtilities`";
ClearAll[for];
SetAttributes[for, HoldAll];
for[x_ ∈ iterator_, body_] /; MatchQ[iterator, _Iterator] :=
Module[i, iter = iterator, tag,
Hold[x] /. Hold[v___] | Hold[v___] :>
Block[v, (* Blocks variables in x *)
Reap[
While[
i = Read[iter];
i =!= IteratorExhausted,
x = i;
Sow[body, tag]
],
tag][[2, 1]]
]];
enumerate[list_List] := NewIterator[
enumerate,
i = 0, max = Length@list,
If[i++ < max, i, list[[i]], IteratorExhausted]];
ClearAll[lc];
SetAttributes[lc, HoldAll];
lc[x_, iterFN_] := Module[tag,
Reap[iterFN[Unevaluated@Sow[x, tag]], tag][[2, 1]]
];
Now the syntax is pretty close to Python's:
[
(el,i,j)
for (i, array) in enumerate(matrix) for (j, el) in enumerate(array) if i!=j
]
lc[
el, i, j,
for[i, array ∈ enumerate@matrix, for[j, el ∈ enumerate@array, If[i != j, #]]] &
]
(* "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1 *)
One could even alter enumerate[]
to index arrays from 0
instead of 1
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
...an implementation of list comprehensions in Python
We could implement Python (poorly) in Mathematica:
Needs@"GeneralUtilities`";
ClearAll[for];
SetAttributes[for, HoldAll];
for[x_ ∈ iterator_, body_] /; MatchQ[iterator, _Iterator] :=
Module[i, iter = iterator, tag,
Hold[x] /. Hold[v___] | Hold[v___] :>
Block[v, (* Blocks variables in x *)
Reap[
While[
i = Read[iter];
i =!= IteratorExhausted,
x = i;
Sow[body, tag]
],
tag][[2, 1]]
]];
enumerate[list_List] := NewIterator[
enumerate,
i = 0, max = Length@list,
If[i++ < max, i, list[[i]], IteratorExhausted]];
ClearAll[lc];
SetAttributes[lc, HoldAll];
lc[x_, iterFN_] := Module[tag,
Reap[iterFN[Unevaluated@Sow[x, tag]], tag][[2, 1]]
];
Now the syntax is pretty close to Python's:
[
(el,i,j)
for (i, array) in enumerate(matrix) for (j, el) in enumerate(array) if i!=j
]
lc[
el, i, j,
for[i, array ∈ enumerate@matrix, for[j, el ∈ enumerate@array, If[i != j, #]]] &
]
(* "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1 *)
One could even alter enumerate[]
to index arrays from 0
instead of 1
.
$endgroup$
...an implementation of list comprehensions in Python
We could implement Python (poorly) in Mathematica:
Needs@"GeneralUtilities`";
ClearAll[for];
SetAttributes[for, HoldAll];
for[x_ ∈ iterator_, body_] /; MatchQ[iterator, _Iterator] :=
Module[i, iter = iterator, tag,
Hold[x] /. Hold[v___] | Hold[v___] :>
Block[v, (* Blocks variables in x *)
Reap[
While[
i = Read[iter];
i =!= IteratorExhausted,
x = i;
Sow[body, tag]
],
tag][[2, 1]]
]];
enumerate[list_List] := NewIterator[
enumerate,
i = 0, max = Length@list,
If[i++ < max, i, list[[i]], IteratorExhausted]];
ClearAll[lc];
SetAttributes[lc, HoldAll];
lc[x_, iterFN_] := Module[tag,
Reap[iterFN[Unevaluated@Sow[x, tag]], tag][[2, 1]]
];
Now the syntax is pretty close to Python's:
[
(el,i,j)
for (i, array) in enumerate(matrix) for (j, el) in enumerate(array) if i!=j
]
lc[
el, i, j,
for[i, array ∈ enumerate@matrix, for[j, el ∈ enumerate@array, If[i != j, #]]] &
]
(* "b", 1, 2, "c", 2, 1 *)
One could even alter enumerate[]
to index arrays from 0
instead of 1
.
edited Jul 3 at 0:39
answered Jul 2 at 23:10
Michael E2Michael E2
155k12 gold badges213 silver badges502 bronze badges
155k12 gold badges213 silver badges502 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201407%2flist-comprehensions-in-mathematica%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
$begingroup$
I don't understand what the Python code does and, frankly, I don't really think you are providing enough info here. Can you explain what you want to do, or perhaps provide the corresponding table or loop MMA code that you mention? What functionality are you looking for exactly?
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Jul 2 at 17:51
$begingroup$
That kind of functionality is provided by
Dataset
.$endgroup$
– Anton Antonov
Jul 2 at 18:11
1
$begingroup$
@MarcoB This is probably the best/most-used feature of python. I'm just looking for an implementation of something equally useful in mma.
$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jul 2 at 20:08
1
$begingroup$
Well, one might say that this is not a python site, and make allowances to encourage folks who know Mathematica well, which is what is needed for a good answer, to try to help. After all, it's not hard to summarize the functionality in the question. Further, re "that's not what I'm looking for": what are you looking for? The iterators in python don't have exact equivalents in M, however close
MapIndexed
is tofor (i, array) in enumerate(matrix)
. And since you have to use a nested loop in python, how do you expect not to have to use a loop in M?$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Jul 2 at 22:59
$begingroup$
Why not just
MapIndexed
with a level spec of2
and a conditionalNothing
and then callFlatten[#, 1]
on that? Seems to me to be the easiest way.$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
Jul 3 at 0:32