I do not have power to all my breakerspower to outlets and switchesThree dead power outlets, no tripped breakersSubpanel - still getting power with breaker disconnectedAdd circuit off main disconnect or sub-panel required?Can you replace a Q1 Circuit Breaker with two QO breakers?60A two pole breaker supplying a sub panel (220v) - how many amps for separate 110v legs?Inadequate grounding of sub panelSub Panel using Sub Feed Lugs3 wire existing feed, not connected to main panel. Do I bond ground and neutralHow can I fix my garage's existing wiringpower to outlets and switches

Why does the salt in the oceans not sink to the bottom?

Why do people say "I am broke" instead of "I am broken"?

Raw curve25519 public key points

Can a character with a low Intelligence score take the Ritual Caster feat and choose the Wizard class?

Travelling from Venice to Budapest, making a stop in Croatia

The seven story archetypes. Are they truly all of them?

Is there a way to shorten this while condition?

Found more old paper shares from broken up companies

Can 々 stand for a duplicated kanji with a different reading?

High income and difficulty during interviews

What is an Eternal Word™?

What happens when two cards both modify what I'm allowed to do?

Is it okay to paraphrase other authors' literature reviews?

What is a "staved" town, like in "Staverton"?

I have a domain, static IP address and many devices I'd like to access outside my house. How do I route them?

If a check is written for bill, but account number is not mentioned on memo line, is it still processed?

Using paddles to support a bug net

How can I deal with someone that wants to kill something that isn't supposed to be killed?

Short story about a group of sci-fi writers sitting around discussing their profession

In a script how can I signal who's winning the argument?

Is a sentence true for two substructures also true for their intersection?

How to repair basic cable/wire issue for household appliances

Why can't a country print its own money to spend it only abroad?

Download file from URL to Safehouse



I do not have power to all my breakers


power to outlets and switchesThree dead power outlets, no tripped breakersSubpanel - still getting power with breaker disconnectedAdd circuit off main disconnect or sub-panel required?Can you replace a Q1 Circuit Breaker with two QO breakers?60A two pole breaker supplying a sub panel (220v) - how many amps for separate 110v legs?Inadequate grounding of sub panelSub Panel using Sub Feed Lugs3 wire existing feed, not connected to main panel. Do I bond ground and neutralHow can I fix my garage's existing wiringpower to outlets and switches






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5















My panel



I exchanged my double pole 40 ampere breaker that supplied my sub panel for my garage with a single pole 40 ampere and now out of my six breakers in the sub panel only 1,3, and 5 have power. How do I resolve the issue to get power to all my breakers?



The reason I exchanged breakers is my sub panel has three lugs, and I had to completely disconnect it to do some work. When I wired it back up, even with the breakers in the sub panel in the off position, I had power to all my outlets and switches. I do not know what I did wrong as it was fine before.



To Harper, yes, there are only three wires supplying the sub panel.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    When you replaced the breaker, what did you do with the second phase?

    – Elros
    Jul 14 at 17:36











  • Are there only 3 wires in the cable between main panel and subpanel? Come to it, can you take a photo of the subpanel with the cover off?

    – Harper
    Jul 14 at 20:02






  • 15





    On other forums where we discuss electrical work, the only response would have been "I'm sorry, but we can't help you." As others have pointed out, there are all manner of issues with your subpanel. Please hire a licensed electrician to sort them out.

    – Julie in Austin
    Jul 15 at 3:31






  • 7





    There's absolutely no shame in knowing when things are beyond you and calling for a registered qualified electrician.

    – Criggie
    Jul 15 at 10:00






  • 2





    @JulieinAustin Why? We can help them. OP did the other end correctly, and while I see several problems here, they are straightforward. I don't think there is a "tipping point" number of problems where we start saying HaP. Of course we try to infer competency from what they say, but their choice to hook up the 3 wires correctly in the main was unusually sharp.

    – Harper
    Jul 16 at 1:09

















5















My panel



I exchanged my double pole 40 ampere breaker that supplied my sub panel for my garage with a single pole 40 ampere and now out of my six breakers in the sub panel only 1,3, and 5 have power. How do I resolve the issue to get power to all my breakers?



The reason I exchanged breakers is my sub panel has three lugs, and I had to completely disconnect it to do some work. When I wired it back up, even with the breakers in the sub panel in the off position, I had power to all my outlets and switches. I do not know what I did wrong as it was fine before.



To Harper, yes, there are only three wires supplying the sub panel.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    When you replaced the breaker, what did you do with the second phase?

    – Elros
    Jul 14 at 17:36











  • Are there only 3 wires in the cable between main panel and subpanel? Come to it, can you take a photo of the subpanel with the cover off?

    – Harper
    Jul 14 at 20:02






  • 15





    On other forums where we discuss electrical work, the only response would have been "I'm sorry, but we can't help you." As others have pointed out, there are all manner of issues with your subpanel. Please hire a licensed electrician to sort them out.

    – Julie in Austin
    Jul 15 at 3:31






  • 7





    There's absolutely no shame in knowing when things are beyond you and calling for a registered qualified electrician.

    – Criggie
    Jul 15 at 10:00






  • 2





    @JulieinAustin Why? We can help them. OP did the other end correctly, and while I see several problems here, they are straightforward. I don't think there is a "tipping point" number of problems where we start saying HaP. Of course we try to infer competency from what they say, but their choice to hook up the 3 wires correctly in the main was unusually sharp.

    – Harper
    Jul 16 at 1:09













5












5








5


1






My panel



I exchanged my double pole 40 ampere breaker that supplied my sub panel for my garage with a single pole 40 ampere and now out of my six breakers in the sub panel only 1,3, and 5 have power. How do I resolve the issue to get power to all my breakers?



The reason I exchanged breakers is my sub panel has three lugs, and I had to completely disconnect it to do some work. When I wired it back up, even with the breakers in the sub panel in the off position, I had power to all my outlets and switches. I do not know what I did wrong as it was fine before.



To Harper, yes, there are only three wires supplying the sub panel.










share|improve this question
















My panel



I exchanged my double pole 40 ampere breaker that supplied my sub panel for my garage with a single pole 40 ampere and now out of my six breakers in the sub panel only 1,3, and 5 have power. How do I resolve the issue to get power to all my breakers?



The reason I exchanged breakers is my sub panel has three lugs, and I had to completely disconnect it to do some work. When I wired it back up, even with the breakers in the sub panel in the off position, I had power to all my outlets and switches. I do not know what I did wrong as it was fine before.



To Harper, yes, there are only three wires supplying the sub panel.







electrical electrical-panel circuit-breaker subpanel






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 15 at 12:23









Machavity

9,5295 gold badges22 silver badges44 bronze badges




9,5295 gold badges22 silver badges44 bronze badges










asked Jul 14 at 17:19









grizorca65grizorca65

291 silver badge3 bronze badges




291 silver badge3 bronze badges







  • 1





    When you replaced the breaker, what did you do with the second phase?

    – Elros
    Jul 14 at 17:36











  • Are there only 3 wires in the cable between main panel and subpanel? Come to it, can you take a photo of the subpanel with the cover off?

    – Harper
    Jul 14 at 20:02






  • 15





    On other forums where we discuss electrical work, the only response would have been "I'm sorry, but we can't help you." As others have pointed out, there are all manner of issues with your subpanel. Please hire a licensed electrician to sort them out.

    – Julie in Austin
    Jul 15 at 3:31






  • 7





    There's absolutely no shame in knowing when things are beyond you and calling for a registered qualified electrician.

    – Criggie
    Jul 15 at 10:00






  • 2





    @JulieinAustin Why? We can help them. OP did the other end correctly, and while I see several problems here, they are straightforward. I don't think there is a "tipping point" number of problems where we start saying HaP. Of course we try to infer competency from what they say, but their choice to hook up the 3 wires correctly in the main was unusually sharp.

    – Harper
    Jul 16 at 1:09












  • 1





    When you replaced the breaker, what did you do with the second phase?

    – Elros
    Jul 14 at 17:36











  • Are there only 3 wires in the cable between main panel and subpanel? Come to it, can you take a photo of the subpanel with the cover off?

    – Harper
    Jul 14 at 20:02






  • 15





    On other forums where we discuss electrical work, the only response would have been "I'm sorry, but we can't help you." As others have pointed out, there are all manner of issues with your subpanel. Please hire a licensed electrician to sort them out.

    – Julie in Austin
    Jul 15 at 3:31






  • 7





    There's absolutely no shame in knowing when things are beyond you and calling for a registered qualified electrician.

    – Criggie
    Jul 15 at 10:00






  • 2





    @JulieinAustin Why? We can help them. OP did the other end correctly, and while I see several problems here, they are straightforward. I don't think there is a "tipping point" number of problems where we start saying HaP. Of course we try to infer competency from what they say, but their choice to hook up the 3 wires correctly in the main was unusually sharp.

    – Harper
    Jul 16 at 1:09







1




1





When you replaced the breaker, what did you do with the second phase?

– Elros
Jul 14 at 17:36





When you replaced the breaker, what did you do with the second phase?

– Elros
Jul 14 at 17:36













Are there only 3 wires in the cable between main panel and subpanel? Come to it, can you take a photo of the subpanel with the cover off?

– Harper
Jul 14 at 20:02





Are there only 3 wires in the cable between main panel and subpanel? Come to it, can you take a photo of the subpanel with the cover off?

– Harper
Jul 14 at 20:02




15




15





On other forums where we discuss electrical work, the only response would have been "I'm sorry, but we can't help you." As others have pointed out, there are all manner of issues with your subpanel. Please hire a licensed electrician to sort them out.

– Julie in Austin
Jul 15 at 3:31





On other forums where we discuss electrical work, the only response would have been "I'm sorry, but we can't help you." As others have pointed out, there are all manner of issues with your subpanel. Please hire a licensed electrician to sort them out.

– Julie in Austin
Jul 15 at 3:31




7




7





There's absolutely no shame in knowing when things are beyond you and calling for a registered qualified electrician.

– Criggie
Jul 15 at 10:00





There's absolutely no shame in knowing when things are beyond you and calling for a registered qualified electrician.

– Criggie
Jul 15 at 10:00




2




2





@JulieinAustin Why? We can help them. OP did the other end correctly, and while I see several problems here, they are straightforward. I don't think there is a "tipping point" number of problems where we start saying HaP. Of course we try to infer competency from what they say, but their choice to hook up the 3 wires correctly in the main was unusually sharp.

– Harper
Jul 16 at 1:09





@JulieinAustin Why? We can help them. OP did the other end correctly, and while I see several problems here, they are straightforward. I don't think there is a "tipping point" number of problems where we start saying HaP. Of course we try to infer competency from what they say, but their choice to hook up the 3 wires correctly in the main was unusually sharp.

– Harper
Jul 16 at 1:09










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















25














Oh dear. This is a foogly mess.



First, you did the right thing by punching that main panel breaker down onto a single. The problem is with the subpanel; it is very badly misconfigured by a guy who cut a lot of shortcuts.



First, it is illegal to double-tap neutral bar screws like that, unless the panel's labeling or instructions say they are intended for that, and these aren't. A few panels will allow 3 grounds on a screw, but always one neutral.



Second, I see no cable clamps on the Romex cables entering this panel. Run down to the electrical supply house and grab a handful.



Separate neutrals and grounds



This sub panel has neutrals and grounds on the same bar. That is improper in a subpanel. Those neutrals and grounds need to be separated, and the grounds need to be attached to the subpanel chassis/frame. The ideal way to do this is to install an accessory ground bar for the panel - however the last guy didn't leave you much length to reach it.



Option 1: The panel may have factory drilled/tapped screw holes for accessory grounding bars. Fit them and buy a Square D brand grounding bar that lines up on those holes. Extend the ground wires down to it with wire nuts. There is a green grounding screw that connects the neutral bar to the box chassis; it appears to already be removed. Remove it.



Option 2: Squeeze a ground bar above the neutral bar, but it must be physically screwed down to the panel, it can't flop around. To bolt it down, either a) use any old metal screws to physically mount it, then run an actual #10++ (#8 would be great) ground wire to a suitable place on the chassis. Or b) mount the ground bar with fine-thread machine screws (bolts) of -32 or finer pitch, and then you can ground the bar through the screws.



Option 3: Convert the neutral bar to a ground bar only. You'll never find that green grounding screw, so just run a jumper wire from this bar to the panel chassis. Remove all the neutrals, and use wire nuts and a pigtail chain to attach supply neutral to the other neutrals. Inelegant, but effective.



Supplying the two hot terminals



The black hot wire coming in needs to be split to supply both hot terminals. (the last guy did a very ugly cheat he should not have done). For this, get about 2 feet of #8 copper wire, black will do, and make 2 pigtails off the solitary hot wire. One goes to where the black wire now is. The other goes to where the ground wire now is. Ideal's big blue wire nut is about right to join three #8s, crank it down HARD.



This converts the panel to a 120V panel. It is not legal to power this subpanel in 120/240V mode, with only 3 wires, as it was before - that would create a very dangerous situation, where if the neutral wire had a problem, everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V.



The panel will only able to supply 40A for all circuits added together, somewhat less than the 2 poles of 40 A that had been cheated in here. So you are at somewhat higher risk of tripping the supply breaker, but it probably won't be an issue.



Is it conduit? Add the 4th wire



If the route of the wire between subpanel and main panel is all conduit, a red wire of the same size should be added to the pipe. Then it can be hooked up like a normal panel.



While you're at this, maybe replace this panel.



Thinking about all the work needed here - ground bars, cable clamps, etc. - and the fact that this panel is already full - and that you may want to replace with a 4-wire cable which you might as well upsize too for more power...



-- well, given that, I'm thinking this might be a good time to just replace the whole panel with a much larger one.



For instance a 20 space would be a step in the right direction (ThreePhaseEel and myself would certainly go 30+, because spaces are cheap, and being out of space is expensive). By "space" I mean actual knockout, ignore that "20 space/40 circuit" baloney, that is a lie since nowadays most breakers must be GFCI or AFCI, and those require a full space each. (this requirement won't affect you since you are grandfathered; merely replacing a panel does not trigger the obligation to retrofit AFCI/GFCI).



If you want to keep the "sunk costs" you already have in those six breakers (we're talking $27 here) then you could stay in Square D Homeline - which is exactly what it says on the tin, a builder-grade cheapie (not unsafe, just not excellent). The way panels are marketed, there's hardly a price difference to get up into the industrial grade units like Square D's QO line, Eaton CH, GE or Siemens. Also, QO and CH are physically smaller.



So you might shop for a panel that will fit, has plenty of extra spaces, and where the neutral and ground wires will reach the bar without extending (we already must split the hot wire). Any type will do; a main breaker is unnecessary here. Some panels come with "bonus breakers".






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    He shouldn't have any issue with short grounds if he mounts the ground bar in the upper gutter, above the neutral...

    – ThreePhaseEel
    Jul 15 at 3:13











  • @ThreePhaseEel True, but not everyone is good at drilling fresh holes in new metal and tapping them -32, so I hope to sidestep the issue by having OP use the factory provided ground bar site. I would probably do that, and I am good at drilling/tapping holes, just because I wouldn't want to nick a wire with the drill.

    – Harper
    Jul 15 at 23:24







  • 1





    Agree on the "foogly mess" characterization, but I'm still confused on what the previous, improper 3-wire feed was. I'm guessing there were, in fact, two hot wires giving some variation on 120/240 -- so was the problem with the neutral and ground? And what, exactly, is the failure mode that ends up with "everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V"?

    – Steve Summit
    Jul 16 at 0:19






  • 2





    @SteveSummit -- what happened was the neutral for the entire subpanel was bootlegged off of ground, so that an open neutral/ground wire would energize the whole panel enclosure and every grounded part on every circuit fed by that subpanel!

    – ThreePhaseEel
    Jul 16 at 0:29











  • @SteveSummit Yeah, it was wired old NEMA 10 dryer connection-style, using the same wire (bare) for neutral and ground both.

    – Harper
    Jul 16 at 0:46


















10














Edit: I wrote this answer before the photo was added. I will defer to Harper’s answer that goes into much detail about the problems.




You have a 240 volt sub panel which was fed from a 240 volt breaker. Now you’re feeding only half of the sub panel with a 120 volt breaker. Sorry, what did you think would happen?



Maybe you don’t understand how dual-leg 240 volt systems work. The incoming 240 volts comes in as two 120 volt legs which are 180 degrees out of phase. You get 120 volt between either hot and neutral and 240 volts between the two hots. Most breaker panels are designed so that the even numbered slots connect to one leg and the odd to the other. Therefore, a full-sized dual breaker connects to both legs to give 240 volts. Combine this with neutral to also give 120 volts.



Assuming you have no 240 loads (dual breakers) in the sub, you could use a pigtail wire to connect both hot wires (that were previously connected to the 240 you removed) to the new 120 volt breaker. However, this would give you half the total amperage in the sub (40 amps instead of 80).



Otherwise, you really need a dual (240 volt) breaker there.






share|improve this answer
































    5














    You need a double pole breaker. More specifically, you need a breaker that supplies power from both phases on the main panel.



    Half your breakers in the sub are now not powered because they were connected to the second phase. It’s not clear what they are tied to now.






    share|improve this answer























    • The problem is, OP doesn't have enough wires in the cable to bring two poles — can only wire this panel 120V-only. OP did the right thing in the main panel IMO.

      – Harper
      Jul 15 at 23:26



















    1














    As others have stated, there are multiple problems with your panel. I would like to point out a few things that have not already been covered.



    1. The reason you had power to switches and outlets even when the circuit breakers were turned off is that you swapped places with the white conductor and the bare ground conductor when you reconnected the feeder (supply cable for the subpanel). The white conductor is connected to the neutral bar in the picture. That conductor was originally connected to the 40 amp double pole breaker. Therefore, when the double pole breaker was turned on, power was arriving at the neutral bar and then was distributed to all of the circuits via the white neutral conductors (and grounds!).


    2. I can not determine from the picture if the feeder is 10/2 UF or 8/2 UF. If the black and white conductors are made up of smaller copper conductors, then it is 8/2. If they are single solid conductors, then it is most likely 10/2. If so, then you need to downsize the circuit breaker supply power to the subpanel to 30 amps.


    Options on what to do:



    1. As an electrician, I can not recommend putting this panel back to its original configuration. But I will tell you how to do it because correctly. Exchange places with the white feeder conductor and feeder ground. Also, there is a place in the neutral bar where a long green screw is supposed to go. This screw connects the metal body of the panel with the neutral bar. If you can not find that screw, then you need to tap a 10/32 threaded hole into the panel, screw a 10/32 green ground screw partially into the hole, hook a 10 awg bare (or green insulated) copper wire around that screw and tighten the screw down, and connect the other end of the bare copper to the neutral bar. Then reinstall the double pole breaker. This is not up to current electrical code, but it is safer than the current configuration and is how older houses are wired.


    2. (I believe the following method has been detailed above) Disconnect the feeder ground wire from the right hand lug. Install a small ground bar in the upper portion of the panel (must be screwed to the body of the panel via tapped holes). Connect all of the grounds to this ground bar. Disconnect the black conductor and connect two short pieces of black conductor of the same size to it. Connect these two "pigtails" to the left and right lugs. Leave the single pole breaker in the main panel. This is the correct method for the existing feeder. Connecting the pigtails may be difficult for you if the feeder is 8 gauge wire, but it is important the connection is solidly done.


    3. Install a 4 wire feeder and a ground bar (8/3 copper UF minimum). Connect black and red conductors to the left and right lugs, white conductor to the neutral lug, and all grounds to the ground bar.


    4. Hire a reputable licensed electrician to perform option 2 or option 3 for you and also fix the problem with the cable entries.


    I highly recommend option 4.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      Welcome to StackExchange. We're always glad to see a professional on here. Answers here should all be to (reasonably) latest Code, unless you really emphasize that you are deviating from Code, and also explain either the risks they are taking that Code is trying to protect from, or a reason Code doesn't really fit this use-case (freezers in basement on GFCI).

      – Harper
      Jul 15 at 23:07


















    0














    The reason why you are only getting power to only breakers 1 3 5 is because u eliminated the other phase on your breaker when u turn it into a single pole breaker so basically u only have a 120 volt going to one bar in your your sub panel. If you take all your breaker out your sub panel you'll see that breakers 1,3,5 are all connected so u don't have power to the other bar. So put your double pole breaker back in for it to work correctly.






    share|improve this answer























    • Hello, and welcome to Home Improvement. Thanks for the answer, but it's hard to understand with the long sentences and "u"s. Would you edit it to clarify? And, you should probably take our tour so you'll know how best to contribute here.

      – Daniel Griscom
      Jul 16 at 10:45











    protected by Community Jul 16 at 2:52



    Thank you for your interest in this question.
    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    25














    Oh dear. This is a foogly mess.



    First, you did the right thing by punching that main panel breaker down onto a single. The problem is with the subpanel; it is very badly misconfigured by a guy who cut a lot of shortcuts.



    First, it is illegal to double-tap neutral bar screws like that, unless the panel's labeling or instructions say they are intended for that, and these aren't. A few panels will allow 3 grounds on a screw, but always one neutral.



    Second, I see no cable clamps on the Romex cables entering this panel. Run down to the electrical supply house and grab a handful.



    Separate neutrals and grounds



    This sub panel has neutrals and grounds on the same bar. That is improper in a subpanel. Those neutrals and grounds need to be separated, and the grounds need to be attached to the subpanel chassis/frame. The ideal way to do this is to install an accessory ground bar for the panel - however the last guy didn't leave you much length to reach it.



    Option 1: The panel may have factory drilled/tapped screw holes for accessory grounding bars. Fit them and buy a Square D brand grounding bar that lines up on those holes. Extend the ground wires down to it with wire nuts. There is a green grounding screw that connects the neutral bar to the box chassis; it appears to already be removed. Remove it.



    Option 2: Squeeze a ground bar above the neutral bar, but it must be physically screwed down to the panel, it can't flop around. To bolt it down, either a) use any old metal screws to physically mount it, then run an actual #10++ (#8 would be great) ground wire to a suitable place on the chassis. Or b) mount the ground bar with fine-thread machine screws (bolts) of -32 or finer pitch, and then you can ground the bar through the screws.



    Option 3: Convert the neutral bar to a ground bar only. You'll never find that green grounding screw, so just run a jumper wire from this bar to the panel chassis. Remove all the neutrals, and use wire nuts and a pigtail chain to attach supply neutral to the other neutrals. Inelegant, but effective.



    Supplying the two hot terminals



    The black hot wire coming in needs to be split to supply both hot terminals. (the last guy did a very ugly cheat he should not have done). For this, get about 2 feet of #8 copper wire, black will do, and make 2 pigtails off the solitary hot wire. One goes to where the black wire now is. The other goes to where the ground wire now is. Ideal's big blue wire nut is about right to join three #8s, crank it down HARD.



    This converts the panel to a 120V panel. It is not legal to power this subpanel in 120/240V mode, with only 3 wires, as it was before - that would create a very dangerous situation, where if the neutral wire had a problem, everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V.



    The panel will only able to supply 40A for all circuits added together, somewhat less than the 2 poles of 40 A that had been cheated in here. So you are at somewhat higher risk of tripping the supply breaker, but it probably won't be an issue.



    Is it conduit? Add the 4th wire



    If the route of the wire between subpanel and main panel is all conduit, a red wire of the same size should be added to the pipe. Then it can be hooked up like a normal panel.



    While you're at this, maybe replace this panel.



    Thinking about all the work needed here - ground bars, cable clamps, etc. - and the fact that this panel is already full - and that you may want to replace with a 4-wire cable which you might as well upsize too for more power...



    -- well, given that, I'm thinking this might be a good time to just replace the whole panel with a much larger one.



    For instance a 20 space would be a step in the right direction (ThreePhaseEel and myself would certainly go 30+, because spaces are cheap, and being out of space is expensive). By "space" I mean actual knockout, ignore that "20 space/40 circuit" baloney, that is a lie since nowadays most breakers must be GFCI or AFCI, and those require a full space each. (this requirement won't affect you since you are grandfathered; merely replacing a panel does not trigger the obligation to retrofit AFCI/GFCI).



    If you want to keep the "sunk costs" you already have in those six breakers (we're talking $27 here) then you could stay in Square D Homeline - which is exactly what it says on the tin, a builder-grade cheapie (not unsafe, just not excellent). The way panels are marketed, there's hardly a price difference to get up into the industrial grade units like Square D's QO line, Eaton CH, GE or Siemens. Also, QO and CH are physically smaller.



    So you might shop for a panel that will fit, has plenty of extra spaces, and where the neutral and ground wires will reach the bar without extending (we already must split the hot wire). Any type will do; a main breaker is unnecessary here. Some panels come with "bonus breakers".






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      He shouldn't have any issue with short grounds if he mounts the ground bar in the upper gutter, above the neutral...

      – ThreePhaseEel
      Jul 15 at 3:13











    • @ThreePhaseEel True, but not everyone is good at drilling fresh holes in new metal and tapping them -32, so I hope to sidestep the issue by having OP use the factory provided ground bar site. I would probably do that, and I am good at drilling/tapping holes, just because I wouldn't want to nick a wire with the drill.

      – Harper
      Jul 15 at 23:24







    • 1





      Agree on the "foogly mess" characterization, but I'm still confused on what the previous, improper 3-wire feed was. I'm guessing there were, in fact, two hot wires giving some variation on 120/240 -- so was the problem with the neutral and ground? And what, exactly, is the failure mode that ends up with "everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V"?

      – Steve Summit
      Jul 16 at 0:19






    • 2





      @SteveSummit -- what happened was the neutral for the entire subpanel was bootlegged off of ground, so that an open neutral/ground wire would energize the whole panel enclosure and every grounded part on every circuit fed by that subpanel!

      – ThreePhaseEel
      Jul 16 at 0:29











    • @SteveSummit Yeah, it was wired old NEMA 10 dryer connection-style, using the same wire (bare) for neutral and ground both.

      – Harper
      Jul 16 at 0:46















    25














    Oh dear. This is a foogly mess.



    First, you did the right thing by punching that main panel breaker down onto a single. The problem is with the subpanel; it is very badly misconfigured by a guy who cut a lot of shortcuts.



    First, it is illegal to double-tap neutral bar screws like that, unless the panel's labeling or instructions say they are intended for that, and these aren't. A few panels will allow 3 grounds on a screw, but always one neutral.



    Second, I see no cable clamps on the Romex cables entering this panel. Run down to the electrical supply house and grab a handful.



    Separate neutrals and grounds



    This sub panel has neutrals and grounds on the same bar. That is improper in a subpanel. Those neutrals and grounds need to be separated, and the grounds need to be attached to the subpanel chassis/frame. The ideal way to do this is to install an accessory ground bar for the panel - however the last guy didn't leave you much length to reach it.



    Option 1: The panel may have factory drilled/tapped screw holes for accessory grounding bars. Fit them and buy a Square D brand grounding bar that lines up on those holes. Extend the ground wires down to it with wire nuts. There is a green grounding screw that connects the neutral bar to the box chassis; it appears to already be removed. Remove it.



    Option 2: Squeeze a ground bar above the neutral bar, but it must be physically screwed down to the panel, it can't flop around. To bolt it down, either a) use any old metal screws to physically mount it, then run an actual #10++ (#8 would be great) ground wire to a suitable place on the chassis. Or b) mount the ground bar with fine-thread machine screws (bolts) of -32 or finer pitch, and then you can ground the bar through the screws.



    Option 3: Convert the neutral bar to a ground bar only. You'll never find that green grounding screw, so just run a jumper wire from this bar to the panel chassis. Remove all the neutrals, and use wire nuts and a pigtail chain to attach supply neutral to the other neutrals. Inelegant, but effective.



    Supplying the two hot terminals



    The black hot wire coming in needs to be split to supply both hot terminals. (the last guy did a very ugly cheat he should not have done). For this, get about 2 feet of #8 copper wire, black will do, and make 2 pigtails off the solitary hot wire. One goes to where the black wire now is. The other goes to where the ground wire now is. Ideal's big blue wire nut is about right to join three #8s, crank it down HARD.



    This converts the panel to a 120V panel. It is not legal to power this subpanel in 120/240V mode, with only 3 wires, as it was before - that would create a very dangerous situation, where if the neutral wire had a problem, everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V.



    The panel will only able to supply 40A for all circuits added together, somewhat less than the 2 poles of 40 A that had been cheated in here. So you are at somewhat higher risk of tripping the supply breaker, but it probably won't be an issue.



    Is it conduit? Add the 4th wire



    If the route of the wire between subpanel and main panel is all conduit, a red wire of the same size should be added to the pipe. Then it can be hooked up like a normal panel.



    While you're at this, maybe replace this panel.



    Thinking about all the work needed here - ground bars, cable clamps, etc. - and the fact that this panel is already full - and that you may want to replace with a 4-wire cable which you might as well upsize too for more power...



    -- well, given that, I'm thinking this might be a good time to just replace the whole panel with a much larger one.



    For instance a 20 space would be a step in the right direction (ThreePhaseEel and myself would certainly go 30+, because spaces are cheap, and being out of space is expensive). By "space" I mean actual knockout, ignore that "20 space/40 circuit" baloney, that is a lie since nowadays most breakers must be GFCI or AFCI, and those require a full space each. (this requirement won't affect you since you are grandfathered; merely replacing a panel does not trigger the obligation to retrofit AFCI/GFCI).



    If you want to keep the "sunk costs" you already have in those six breakers (we're talking $27 here) then you could stay in Square D Homeline - which is exactly what it says on the tin, a builder-grade cheapie (not unsafe, just not excellent). The way panels are marketed, there's hardly a price difference to get up into the industrial grade units like Square D's QO line, Eaton CH, GE or Siemens. Also, QO and CH are physically smaller.



    So you might shop for a panel that will fit, has plenty of extra spaces, and where the neutral and ground wires will reach the bar without extending (we already must split the hot wire). Any type will do; a main breaker is unnecessary here. Some panels come with "bonus breakers".






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      He shouldn't have any issue with short grounds if he mounts the ground bar in the upper gutter, above the neutral...

      – ThreePhaseEel
      Jul 15 at 3:13











    • @ThreePhaseEel True, but not everyone is good at drilling fresh holes in new metal and tapping them -32, so I hope to sidestep the issue by having OP use the factory provided ground bar site. I would probably do that, and I am good at drilling/tapping holes, just because I wouldn't want to nick a wire with the drill.

      – Harper
      Jul 15 at 23:24







    • 1





      Agree on the "foogly mess" characterization, but I'm still confused on what the previous, improper 3-wire feed was. I'm guessing there were, in fact, two hot wires giving some variation on 120/240 -- so was the problem with the neutral and ground? And what, exactly, is the failure mode that ends up with "everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V"?

      – Steve Summit
      Jul 16 at 0:19






    • 2





      @SteveSummit -- what happened was the neutral for the entire subpanel was bootlegged off of ground, so that an open neutral/ground wire would energize the whole panel enclosure and every grounded part on every circuit fed by that subpanel!

      – ThreePhaseEel
      Jul 16 at 0:29











    • @SteveSummit Yeah, it was wired old NEMA 10 dryer connection-style, using the same wire (bare) for neutral and ground both.

      – Harper
      Jul 16 at 0:46













    25












    25








    25







    Oh dear. This is a foogly mess.



    First, you did the right thing by punching that main panel breaker down onto a single. The problem is with the subpanel; it is very badly misconfigured by a guy who cut a lot of shortcuts.



    First, it is illegal to double-tap neutral bar screws like that, unless the panel's labeling or instructions say they are intended for that, and these aren't. A few panels will allow 3 grounds on a screw, but always one neutral.



    Second, I see no cable clamps on the Romex cables entering this panel. Run down to the electrical supply house and grab a handful.



    Separate neutrals and grounds



    This sub panel has neutrals and grounds on the same bar. That is improper in a subpanel. Those neutrals and grounds need to be separated, and the grounds need to be attached to the subpanel chassis/frame. The ideal way to do this is to install an accessory ground bar for the panel - however the last guy didn't leave you much length to reach it.



    Option 1: The panel may have factory drilled/tapped screw holes for accessory grounding bars. Fit them and buy a Square D brand grounding bar that lines up on those holes. Extend the ground wires down to it with wire nuts. There is a green grounding screw that connects the neutral bar to the box chassis; it appears to already be removed. Remove it.



    Option 2: Squeeze a ground bar above the neutral bar, but it must be physically screwed down to the panel, it can't flop around. To bolt it down, either a) use any old metal screws to physically mount it, then run an actual #10++ (#8 would be great) ground wire to a suitable place on the chassis. Or b) mount the ground bar with fine-thread machine screws (bolts) of -32 or finer pitch, and then you can ground the bar through the screws.



    Option 3: Convert the neutral bar to a ground bar only. You'll never find that green grounding screw, so just run a jumper wire from this bar to the panel chassis. Remove all the neutrals, and use wire nuts and a pigtail chain to attach supply neutral to the other neutrals. Inelegant, but effective.



    Supplying the two hot terminals



    The black hot wire coming in needs to be split to supply both hot terminals. (the last guy did a very ugly cheat he should not have done). For this, get about 2 feet of #8 copper wire, black will do, and make 2 pigtails off the solitary hot wire. One goes to where the black wire now is. The other goes to where the ground wire now is. Ideal's big blue wire nut is about right to join three #8s, crank it down HARD.



    This converts the panel to a 120V panel. It is not legal to power this subpanel in 120/240V mode, with only 3 wires, as it was before - that would create a very dangerous situation, where if the neutral wire had a problem, everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V.



    The panel will only able to supply 40A for all circuits added together, somewhat less than the 2 poles of 40 A that had been cheated in here. So you are at somewhat higher risk of tripping the supply breaker, but it probably won't be an issue.



    Is it conduit? Add the 4th wire



    If the route of the wire between subpanel and main panel is all conduit, a red wire of the same size should be added to the pipe. Then it can be hooked up like a normal panel.



    While you're at this, maybe replace this panel.



    Thinking about all the work needed here - ground bars, cable clamps, etc. - and the fact that this panel is already full - and that you may want to replace with a 4-wire cable which you might as well upsize too for more power...



    -- well, given that, I'm thinking this might be a good time to just replace the whole panel with a much larger one.



    For instance a 20 space would be a step in the right direction (ThreePhaseEel and myself would certainly go 30+, because spaces are cheap, and being out of space is expensive). By "space" I mean actual knockout, ignore that "20 space/40 circuit" baloney, that is a lie since nowadays most breakers must be GFCI or AFCI, and those require a full space each. (this requirement won't affect you since you are grandfathered; merely replacing a panel does not trigger the obligation to retrofit AFCI/GFCI).



    If you want to keep the "sunk costs" you already have in those six breakers (we're talking $27 here) then you could stay in Square D Homeline - which is exactly what it says on the tin, a builder-grade cheapie (not unsafe, just not excellent). The way panels are marketed, there's hardly a price difference to get up into the industrial grade units like Square D's QO line, Eaton CH, GE or Siemens. Also, QO and CH are physically smaller.



    So you might shop for a panel that will fit, has plenty of extra spaces, and where the neutral and ground wires will reach the bar without extending (we already must split the hot wire). Any type will do; a main breaker is unnecessary here. Some panels come with "bonus breakers".






    share|improve this answer















    Oh dear. This is a foogly mess.



    First, you did the right thing by punching that main panel breaker down onto a single. The problem is with the subpanel; it is very badly misconfigured by a guy who cut a lot of shortcuts.



    First, it is illegal to double-tap neutral bar screws like that, unless the panel's labeling or instructions say they are intended for that, and these aren't. A few panels will allow 3 grounds on a screw, but always one neutral.



    Second, I see no cable clamps on the Romex cables entering this panel. Run down to the electrical supply house and grab a handful.



    Separate neutrals and grounds



    This sub panel has neutrals and grounds on the same bar. That is improper in a subpanel. Those neutrals and grounds need to be separated, and the grounds need to be attached to the subpanel chassis/frame. The ideal way to do this is to install an accessory ground bar for the panel - however the last guy didn't leave you much length to reach it.



    Option 1: The panel may have factory drilled/tapped screw holes for accessory grounding bars. Fit them and buy a Square D brand grounding bar that lines up on those holes. Extend the ground wires down to it with wire nuts. There is a green grounding screw that connects the neutral bar to the box chassis; it appears to already be removed. Remove it.



    Option 2: Squeeze a ground bar above the neutral bar, but it must be physically screwed down to the panel, it can't flop around. To bolt it down, either a) use any old metal screws to physically mount it, then run an actual #10++ (#8 would be great) ground wire to a suitable place on the chassis. Or b) mount the ground bar with fine-thread machine screws (bolts) of -32 or finer pitch, and then you can ground the bar through the screws.



    Option 3: Convert the neutral bar to a ground bar only. You'll never find that green grounding screw, so just run a jumper wire from this bar to the panel chassis. Remove all the neutrals, and use wire nuts and a pigtail chain to attach supply neutral to the other neutrals. Inelegant, but effective.



    Supplying the two hot terminals



    The black hot wire coming in needs to be split to supply both hot terminals. (the last guy did a very ugly cheat he should not have done). For this, get about 2 feet of #8 copper wire, black will do, and make 2 pigtails off the solitary hot wire. One goes to where the black wire now is. The other goes to where the ground wire now is. Ideal's big blue wire nut is about right to join three #8s, crank it down HARD.



    This converts the panel to a 120V panel. It is not legal to power this subpanel in 120/240V mode, with only 3 wires, as it was before - that would create a very dangerous situation, where if the neutral wire had a problem, everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V.



    The panel will only able to supply 40A for all circuits added together, somewhat less than the 2 poles of 40 A that had been cheated in here. So you are at somewhat higher risk of tripping the supply breaker, but it probably won't be an issue.



    Is it conduit? Add the 4th wire



    If the route of the wire between subpanel and main panel is all conduit, a red wire of the same size should be added to the pipe. Then it can be hooked up like a normal panel.



    While you're at this, maybe replace this panel.



    Thinking about all the work needed here - ground bars, cable clamps, etc. - and the fact that this panel is already full - and that you may want to replace with a 4-wire cable which you might as well upsize too for more power...



    -- well, given that, I'm thinking this might be a good time to just replace the whole panel with a much larger one.



    For instance a 20 space would be a step in the right direction (ThreePhaseEel and myself would certainly go 30+, because spaces are cheap, and being out of space is expensive). By "space" I mean actual knockout, ignore that "20 space/40 circuit" baloney, that is a lie since nowadays most breakers must be GFCI or AFCI, and those require a full space each. (this requirement won't affect you since you are grandfathered; merely replacing a panel does not trigger the obligation to retrofit AFCI/GFCI).



    If you want to keep the "sunk costs" you already have in those six breakers (we're talking $27 here) then you could stay in Square D Homeline - which is exactly what it says on the tin, a builder-grade cheapie (not unsafe, just not excellent). The way panels are marketed, there's hardly a price difference to get up into the industrial grade units like Square D's QO line, Eaton CH, GE or Siemens. Also, QO and CH are physically smaller.



    So you might shop for a panel that will fit, has plenty of extra spaces, and where the neutral and ground wires will reach the bar without extending (we already must split the hot wire). Any type will do; a main breaker is unnecessary here. Some panels come with "bonus breakers".







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jul 15 at 23:21

























    answered Jul 14 at 19:38









    HarperHarper

    89k6 gold badges65 silver badges184 bronze badges




    89k6 gold badges65 silver badges184 bronze badges







    • 2





      He shouldn't have any issue with short grounds if he mounts the ground bar in the upper gutter, above the neutral...

      – ThreePhaseEel
      Jul 15 at 3:13











    • @ThreePhaseEel True, but not everyone is good at drilling fresh holes in new metal and tapping them -32, so I hope to sidestep the issue by having OP use the factory provided ground bar site. I would probably do that, and I am good at drilling/tapping holes, just because I wouldn't want to nick a wire with the drill.

      – Harper
      Jul 15 at 23:24







    • 1





      Agree on the "foogly mess" characterization, but I'm still confused on what the previous, improper 3-wire feed was. I'm guessing there were, in fact, two hot wires giving some variation on 120/240 -- so was the problem with the neutral and ground? And what, exactly, is the failure mode that ends up with "everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V"?

      – Steve Summit
      Jul 16 at 0:19






    • 2





      @SteveSummit -- what happened was the neutral for the entire subpanel was bootlegged off of ground, so that an open neutral/ground wire would energize the whole panel enclosure and every grounded part on every circuit fed by that subpanel!

      – ThreePhaseEel
      Jul 16 at 0:29











    • @SteveSummit Yeah, it was wired old NEMA 10 dryer connection-style, using the same wire (bare) for neutral and ground both.

      – Harper
      Jul 16 at 0:46












    • 2





      He shouldn't have any issue with short grounds if he mounts the ground bar in the upper gutter, above the neutral...

      – ThreePhaseEel
      Jul 15 at 3:13











    • @ThreePhaseEel True, but not everyone is good at drilling fresh holes in new metal and tapping them -32, so I hope to sidestep the issue by having OP use the factory provided ground bar site. I would probably do that, and I am good at drilling/tapping holes, just because I wouldn't want to nick a wire with the drill.

      – Harper
      Jul 15 at 23:24







    • 1





      Agree on the "foogly mess" characterization, but I'm still confused on what the previous, improper 3-wire feed was. I'm guessing there were, in fact, two hot wires giving some variation on 120/240 -- so was the problem with the neutral and ground? And what, exactly, is the failure mode that ends up with "everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V"?

      – Steve Summit
      Jul 16 at 0:19






    • 2





      @SteveSummit -- what happened was the neutral for the entire subpanel was bootlegged off of ground, so that an open neutral/ground wire would energize the whole panel enclosure and every grounded part on every circuit fed by that subpanel!

      – ThreePhaseEel
      Jul 16 at 0:29











    • @SteveSummit Yeah, it was wired old NEMA 10 dryer connection-style, using the same wire (bare) for neutral and ground both.

      – Harper
      Jul 16 at 0:46







    2




    2





    He shouldn't have any issue with short grounds if he mounts the ground bar in the upper gutter, above the neutral...

    – ThreePhaseEel
    Jul 15 at 3:13





    He shouldn't have any issue with short grounds if he mounts the ground bar in the upper gutter, above the neutral...

    – ThreePhaseEel
    Jul 15 at 3:13













    @ThreePhaseEel True, but not everyone is good at drilling fresh holes in new metal and tapping them -32, so I hope to sidestep the issue by having OP use the factory provided ground bar site. I would probably do that, and I am good at drilling/tapping holes, just because I wouldn't want to nick a wire with the drill.

    – Harper
    Jul 15 at 23:24






    @ThreePhaseEel True, but not everyone is good at drilling fresh holes in new metal and tapping them -32, so I hope to sidestep the issue by having OP use the factory provided ground bar site. I would probably do that, and I am good at drilling/tapping holes, just because I wouldn't want to nick a wire with the drill.

    – Harper
    Jul 15 at 23:24





    1




    1





    Agree on the "foogly mess" characterization, but I'm still confused on what the previous, improper 3-wire feed was. I'm guessing there were, in fact, two hot wires giving some variation on 120/240 -- so was the problem with the neutral and ground? And what, exactly, is the failure mode that ends up with "everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V"?

    – Steve Summit
    Jul 16 at 0:19





    Agree on the "foogly mess" characterization, but I'm still confused on what the previous, improper 3-wire feed was. I'm guessing there were, in fact, two hot wires giving some variation on 120/240 -- so was the problem with the neutral and ground? And what, exactly, is the failure mode that ends up with "everything that is supposed to be grounded would energize at 120V"?

    – Steve Summit
    Jul 16 at 0:19




    2




    2





    @SteveSummit -- what happened was the neutral for the entire subpanel was bootlegged off of ground, so that an open neutral/ground wire would energize the whole panel enclosure and every grounded part on every circuit fed by that subpanel!

    – ThreePhaseEel
    Jul 16 at 0:29





    @SteveSummit -- what happened was the neutral for the entire subpanel was bootlegged off of ground, so that an open neutral/ground wire would energize the whole panel enclosure and every grounded part on every circuit fed by that subpanel!

    – ThreePhaseEel
    Jul 16 at 0:29













    @SteveSummit Yeah, it was wired old NEMA 10 dryer connection-style, using the same wire (bare) for neutral and ground both.

    – Harper
    Jul 16 at 0:46





    @SteveSummit Yeah, it was wired old NEMA 10 dryer connection-style, using the same wire (bare) for neutral and ground both.

    – Harper
    Jul 16 at 0:46













    10














    Edit: I wrote this answer before the photo was added. I will defer to Harper’s answer that goes into much detail about the problems.




    You have a 240 volt sub panel which was fed from a 240 volt breaker. Now you’re feeding only half of the sub panel with a 120 volt breaker. Sorry, what did you think would happen?



    Maybe you don’t understand how dual-leg 240 volt systems work. The incoming 240 volts comes in as two 120 volt legs which are 180 degrees out of phase. You get 120 volt between either hot and neutral and 240 volts between the two hots. Most breaker panels are designed so that the even numbered slots connect to one leg and the odd to the other. Therefore, a full-sized dual breaker connects to both legs to give 240 volts. Combine this with neutral to also give 120 volts.



    Assuming you have no 240 loads (dual breakers) in the sub, you could use a pigtail wire to connect both hot wires (that were previously connected to the 240 you removed) to the new 120 volt breaker. However, this would give you half the total amperage in the sub (40 amps instead of 80).



    Otherwise, you really need a dual (240 volt) breaker there.






    share|improve this answer





























      10














      Edit: I wrote this answer before the photo was added. I will defer to Harper’s answer that goes into much detail about the problems.




      You have a 240 volt sub panel which was fed from a 240 volt breaker. Now you’re feeding only half of the sub panel with a 120 volt breaker. Sorry, what did you think would happen?



      Maybe you don’t understand how dual-leg 240 volt systems work. The incoming 240 volts comes in as two 120 volt legs which are 180 degrees out of phase. You get 120 volt between either hot and neutral and 240 volts between the two hots. Most breaker panels are designed so that the even numbered slots connect to one leg and the odd to the other. Therefore, a full-sized dual breaker connects to both legs to give 240 volts. Combine this with neutral to also give 120 volts.



      Assuming you have no 240 loads (dual breakers) in the sub, you could use a pigtail wire to connect both hot wires (that were previously connected to the 240 you removed) to the new 120 volt breaker. However, this would give you half the total amperage in the sub (40 amps instead of 80).



      Otherwise, you really need a dual (240 volt) breaker there.






      share|improve this answer



























        10












        10








        10







        Edit: I wrote this answer before the photo was added. I will defer to Harper’s answer that goes into much detail about the problems.




        You have a 240 volt sub panel which was fed from a 240 volt breaker. Now you’re feeding only half of the sub panel with a 120 volt breaker. Sorry, what did you think would happen?



        Maybe you don’t understand how dual-leg 240 volt systems work. The incoming 240 volts comes in as two 120 volt legs which are 180 degrees out of phase. You get 120 volt between either hot and neutral and 240 volts between the two hots. Most breaker panels are designed so that the even numbered slots connect to one leg and the odd to the other. Therefore, a full-sized dual breaker connects to both legs to give 240 volts. Combine this with neutral to also give 120 volts.



        Assuming you have no 240 loads (dual breakers) in the sub, you could use a pigtail wire to connect both hot wires (that were previously connected to the 240 you removed) to the new 120 volt breaker. However, this would give you half the total amperage in the sub (40 amps instead of 80).



        Otherwise, you really need a dual (240 volt) breaker there.






        share|improve this answer















        Edit: I wrote this answer before the photo was added. I will defer to Harper’s answer that goes into much detail about the problems.




        You have a 240 volt sub panel which was fed from a 240 volt breaker. Now you’re feeding only half of the sub panel with a 120 volt breaker. Sorry, what did you think would happen?



        Maybe you don’t understand how dual-leg 240 volt systems work. The incoming 240 volts comes in as two 120 volt legs which are 180 degrees out of phase. You get 120 volt between either hot and neutral and 240 volts between the two hots. Most breaker panels are designed so that the even numbered slots connect to one leg and the odd to the other. Therefore, a full-sized dual breaker connects to both legs to give 240 volts. Combine this with neutral to also give 120 volts.



        Assuming you have no 240 loads (dual breakers) in the sub, you could use a pigtail wire to connect both hot wires (that were previously connected to the 240 you removed) to the new 120 volt breaker. However, this would give you half the total amperage in the sub (40 amps instead of 80).



        Otherwise, you really need a dual (240 volt) breaker there.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jul 15 at 5:24

























        answered Jul 14 at 17:37









        DoxyLoverDoxyLover

        3,9341 gold badge8 silver badges18 bronze badges




        3,9341 gold badge8 silver badges18 bronze badges





















            5














            You need a double pole breaker. More specifically, you need a breaker that supplies power from both phases on the main panel.



            Half your breakers in the sub are now not powered because they were connected to the second phase. It’s not clear what they are tied to now.






            share|improve this answer























            • The problem is, OP doesn't have enough wires in the cable to bring two poles — can only wire this panel 120V-only. OP did the right thing in the main panel IMO.

              – Harper
              Jul 15 at 23:26
















            5














            You need a double pole breaker. More specifically, you need a breaker that supplies power from both phases on the main panel.



            Half your breakers in the sub are now not powered because they were connected to the second phase. It’s not clear what they are tied to now.






            share|improve this answer























            • The problem is, OP doesn't have enough wires in the cable to bring two poles — can only wire this panel 120V-only. OP did the right thing in the main panel IMO.

              – Harper
              Jul 15 at 23:26














            5












            5








            5







            You need a double pole breaker. More specifically, you need a breaker that supplies power from both phases on the main panel.



            Half your breakers in the sub are now not powered because they were connected to the second phase. It’s not clear what they are tied to now.






            share|improve this answer













            You need a double pole breaker. More specifically, you need a breaker that supplies power from both phases on the main panel.



            Half your breakers in the sub are now not powered because they were connected to the second phase. It’s not clear what they are tied to now.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jul 14 at 17:36









            ElrosElros

            1187 bronze badges




            1187 bronze badges












            • The problem is, OP doesn't have enough wires in the cable to bring two poles — can only wire this panel 120V-only. OP did the right thing in the main panel IMO.

              – Harper
              Jul 15 at 23:26


















            • The problem is, OP doesn't have enough wires in the cable to bring two poles — can only wire this panel 120V-only. OP did the right thing in the main panel IMO.

              – Harper
              Jul 15 at 23:26

















            The problem is, OP doesn't have enough wires in the cable to bring two poles — can only wire this panel 120V-only. OP did the right thing in the main panel IMO.

            – Harper
            Jul 15 at 23:26






            The problem is, OP doesn't have enough wires in the cable to bring two poles — can only wire this panel 120V-only. OP did the right thing in the main panel IMO.

            – Harper
            Jul 15 at 23:26












            1














            As others have stated, there are multiple problems with your panel. I would like to point out a few things that have not already been covered.



            1. The reason you had power to switches and outlets even when the circuit breakers were turned off is that you swapped places with the white conductor and the bare ground conductor when you reconnected the feeder (supply cable for the subpanel). The white conductor is connected to the neutral bar in the picture. That conductor was originally connected to the 40 amp double pole breaker. Therefore, when the double pole breaker was turned on, power was arriving at the neutral bar and then was distributed to all of the circuits via the white neutral conductors (and grounds!).


            2. I can not determine from the picture if the feeder is 10/2 UF or 8/2 UF. If the black and white conductors are made up of smaller copper conductors, then it is 8/2. If they are single solid conductors, then it is most likely 10/2. If so, then you need to downsize the circuit breaker supply power to the subpanel to 30 amps.


            Options on what to do:



            1. As an electrician, I can not recommend putting this panel back to its original configuration. But I will tell you how to do it because correctly. Exchange places with the white feeder conductor and feeder ground. Also, there is a place in the neutral bar where a long green screw is supposed to go. This screw connects the metal body of the panel with the neutral bar. If you can not find that screw, then you need to tap a 10/32 threaded hole into the panel, screw a 10/32 green ground screw partially into the hole, hook a 10 awg bare (or green insulated) copper wire around that screw and tighten the screw down, and connect the other end of the bare copper to the neutral bar. Then reinstall the double pole breaker. This is not up to current electrical code, but it is safer than the current configuration and is how older houses are wired.


            2. (I believe the following method has been detailed above) Disconnect the feeder ground wire from the right hand lug. Install a small ground bar in the upper portion of the panel (must be screwed to the body of the panel via tapped holes). Connect all of the grounds to this ground bar. Disconnect the black conductor and connect two short pieces of black conductor of the same size to it. Connect these two "pigtails" to the left and right lugs. Leave the single pole breaker in the main panel. This is the correct method for the existing feeder. Connecting the pigtails may be difficult for you if the feeder is 8 gauge wire, but it is important the connection is solidly done.


            3. Install a 4 wire feeder and a ground bar (8/3 copper UF minimum). Connect black and red conductors to the left and right lugs, white conductor to the neutral lug, and all grounds to the ground bar.


            4. Hire a reputable licensed electrician to perform option 2 or option 3 for you and also fix the problem with the cable entries.


            I highly recommend option 4.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 2





              Welcome to StackExchange. We're always glad to see a professional on here. Answers here should all be to (reasonably) latest Code, unless you really emphasize that you are deviating from Code, and also explain either the risks they are taking that Code is trying to protect from, or a reason Code doesn't really fit this use-case (freezers in basement on GFCI).

              – Harper
              Jul 15 at 23:07















            1














            As others have stated, there are multiple problems with your panel. I would like to point out a few things that have not already been covered.



            1. The reason you had power to switches and outlets even when the circuit breakers were turned off is that you swapped places with the white conductor and the bare ground conductor when you reconnected the feeder (supply cable for the subpanel). The white conductor is connected to the neutral bar in the picture. That conductor was originally connected to the 40 amp double pole breaker. Therefore, when the double pole breaker was turned on, power was arriving at the neutral bar and then was distributed to all of the circuits via the white neutral conductors (and grounds!).


            2. I can not determine from the picture if the feeder is 10/2 UF or 8/2 UF. If the black and white conductors are made up of smaller copper conductors, then it is 8/2. If they are single solid conductors, then it is most likely 10/2. If so, then you need to downsize the circuit breaker supply power to the subpanel to 30 amps.


            Options on what to do:



            1. As an electrician, I can not recommend putting this panel back to its original configuration. But I will tell you how to do it because correctly. Exchange places with the white feeder conductor and feeder ground. Also, there is a place in the neutral bar where a long green screw is supposed to go. This screw connects the metal body of the panel with the neutral bar. If you can not find that screw, then you need to tap a 10/32 threaded hole into the panel, screw a 10/32 green ground screw partially into the hole, hook a 10 awg bare (or green insulated) copper wire around that screw and tighten the screw down, and connect the other end of the bare copper to the neutral bar. Then reinstall the double pole breaker. This is not up to current electrical code, but it is safer than the current configuration and is how older houses are wired.


            2. (I believe the following method has been detailed above) Disconnect the feeder ground wire from the right hand lug. Install a small ground bar in the upper portion of the panel (must be screwed to the body of the panel via tapped holes). Connect all of the grounds to this ground bar. Disconnect the black conductor and connect two short pieces of black conductor of the same size to it. Connect these two "pigtails" to the left and right lugs. Leave the single pole breaker in the main panel. This is the correct method for the existing feeder. Connecting the pigtails may be difficult for you if the feeder is 8 gauge wire, but it is important the connection is solidly done.


            3. Install a 4 wire feeder and a ground bar (8/3 copper UF minimum). Connect black and red conductors to the left and right lugs, white conductor to the neutral lug, and all grounds to the ground bar.


            4. Hire a reputable licensed electrician to perform option 2 or option 3 for you and also fix the problem with the cable entries.


            I highly recommend option 4.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 2





              Welcome to StackExchange. We're always glad to see a professional on here. Answers here should all be to (reasonably) latest Code, unless you really emphasize that you are deviating from Code, and also explain either the risks they are taking that Code is trying to protect from, or a reason Code doesn't really fit this use-case (freezers in basement on GFCI).

              – Harper
              Jul 15 at 23:07













            1












            1








            1







            As others have stated, there are multiple problems with your panel. I would like to point out a few things that have not already been covered.



            1. The reason you had power to switches and outlets even when the circuit breakers were turned off is that you swapped places with the white conductor and the bare ground conductor when you reconnected the feeder (supply cable for the subpanel). The white conductor is connected to the neutral bar in the picture. That conductor was originally connected to the 40 amp double pole breaker. Therefore, when the double pole breaker was turned on, power was arriving at the neutral bar and then was distributed to all of the circuits via the white neutral conductors (and grounds!).


            2. I can not determine from the picture if the feeder is 10/2 UF or 8/2 UF. If the black and white conductors are made up of smaller copper conductors, then it is 8/2. If they are single solid conductors, then it is most likely 10/2. If so, then you need to downsize the circuit breaker supply power to the subpanel to 30 amps.


            Options on what to do:



            1. As an electrician, I can not recommend putting this panel back to its original configuration. But I will tell you how to do it because correctly. Exchange places with the white feeder conductor and feeder ground. Also, there is a place in the neutral bar where a long green screw is supposed to go. This screw connects the metal body of the panel with the neutral bar. If you can not find that screw, then you need to tap a 10/32 threaded hole into the panel, screw a 10/32 green ground screw partially into the hole, hook a 10 awg bare (or green insulated) copper wire around that screw and tighten the screw down, and connect the other end of the bare copper to the neutral bar. Then reinstall the double pole breaker. This is not up to current electrical code, but it is safer than the current configuration and is how older houses are wired.


            2. (I believe the following method has been detailed above) Disconnect the feeder ground wire from the right hand lug. Install a small ground bar in the upper portion of the panel (must be screwed to the body of the panel via tapped holes). Connect all of the grounds to this ground bar. Disconnect the black conductor and connect two short pieces of black conductor of the same size to it. Connect these two "pigtails" to the left and right lugs. Leave the single pole breaker in the main panel. This is the correct method for the existing feeder. Connecting the pigtails may be difficult for you if the feeder is 8 gauge wire, but it is important the connection is solidly done.


            3. Install a 4 wire feeder and a ground bar (8/3 copper UF minimum). Connect black and red conductors to the left and right lugs, white conductor to the neutral lug, and all grounds to the ground bar.


            4. Hire a reputable licensed electrician to perform option 2 or option 3 for you and also fix the problem with the cable entries.


            I highly recommend option 4.






            share|improve this answer















            As others have stated, there are multiple problems with your panel. I would like to point out a few things that have not already been covered.



            1. The reason you had power to switches and outlets even when the circuit breakers were turned off is that you swapped places with the white conductor and the bare ground conductor when you reconnected the feeder (supply cable for the subpanel). The white conductor is connected to the neutral bar in the picture. That conductor was originally connected to the 40 amp double pole breaker. Therefore, when the double pole breaker was turned on, power was arriving at the neutral bar and then was distributed to all of the circuits via the white neutral conductors (and grounds!).


            2. I can not determine from the picture if the feeder is 10/2 UF or 8/2 UF. If the black and white conductors are made up of smaller copper conductors, then it is 8/2. If they are single solid conductors, then it is most likely 10/2. If so, then you need to downsize the circuit breaker supply power to the subpanel to 30 amps.


            Options on what to do:



            1. As an electrician, I can not recommend putting this panel back to its original configuration. But I will tell you how to do it because correctly. Exchange places with the white feeder conductor and feeder ground. Also, there is a place in the neutral bar where a long green screw is supposed to go. This screw connects the metal body of the panel with the neutral bar. If you can not find that screw, then you need to tap a 10/32 threaded hole into the panel, screw a 10/32 green ground screw partially into the hole, hook a 10 awg bare (or green insulated) copper wire around that screw and tighten the screw down, and connect the other end of the bare copper to the neutral bar. Then reinstall the double pole breaker. This is not up to current electrical code, but it is safer than the current configuration and is how older houses are wired.


            2. (I believe the following method has been detailed above) Disconnect the feeder ground wire from the right hand lug. Install a small ground bar in the upper portion of the panel (must be screwed to the body of the panel via tapped holes). Connect all of the grounds to this ground bar. Disconnect the black conductor and connect two short pieces of black conductor of the same size to it. Connect these two "pigtails" to the left and right lugs. Leave the single pole breaker in the main panel. This is the correct method for the existing feeder. Connecting the pigtails may be difficult for you if the feeder is 8 gauge wire, but it is important the connection is solidly done.


            3. Install a 4 wire feeder and a ground bar (8/3 copper UF minimum). Connect black and red conductors to the left and right lugs, white conductor to the neutral lug, and all grounds to the ground bar.


            4. Hire a reputable licensed electrician to perform option 2 or option 3 for you and also fix the problem with the cable entries.


            I highly recommend option 4.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jul 15 at 23:42









            manassehkatz

            15.2k1 gold badge21 silver badges48 bronze badges




            15.2k1 gold badge21 silver badges48 bronze badges










            answered Jul 15 at 22:17









            Adam HairAdam Hair

            111 bronze badge




            111 bronze badge







            • 2





              Welcome to StackExchange. We're always glad to see a professional on here. Answers here should all be to (reasonably) latest Code, unless you really emphasize that you are deviating from Code, and also explain either the risks they are taking that Code is trying to protect from, or a reason Code doesn't really fit this use-case (freezers in basement on GFCI).

              – Harper
              Jul 15 at 23:07












            • 2





              Welcome to StackExchange. We're always glad to see a professional on here. Answers here should all be to (reasonably) latest Code, unless you really emphasize that you are deviating from Code, and also explain either the risks they are taking that Code is trying to protect from, or a reason Code doesn't really fit this use-case (freezers in basement on GFCI).

              – Harper
              Jul 15 at 23:07







            2




            2





            Welcome to StackExchange. We're always glad to see a professional on here. Answers here should all be to (reasonably) latest Code, unless you really emphasize that you are deviating from Code, and also explain either the risks they are taking that Code is trying to protect from, or a reason Code doesn't really fit this use-case (freezers in basement on GFCI).

            – Harper
            Jul 15 at 23:07





            Welcome to StackExchange. We're always glad to see a professional on here. Answers here should all be to (reasonably) latest Code, unless you really emphasize that you are deviating from Code, and also explain either the risks they are taking that Code is trying to protect from, or a reason Code doesn't really fit this use-case (freezers in basement on GFCI).

            – Harper
            Jul 15 at 23:07











            0














            The reason why you are only getting power to only breakers 1 3 5 is because u eliminated the other phase on your breaker when u turn it into a single pole breaker so basically u only have a 120 volt going to one bar in your your sub panel. If you take all your breaker out your sub panel you'll see that breakers 1,3,5 are all connected so u don't have power to the other bar. So put your double pole breaker back in for it to work correctly.






            share|improve this answer























            • Hello, and welcome to Home Improvement. Thanks for the answer, but it's hard to understand with the long sentences and "u"s. Would you edit it to clarify? And, you should probably take our tour so you'll know how best to contribute here.

              – Daniel Griscom
              Jul 16 at 10:45















            0














            The reason why you are only getting power to only breakers 1 3 5 is because u eliminated the other phase on your breaker when u turn it into a single pole breaker so basically u only have a 120 volt going to one bar in your your sub panel. If you take all your breaker out your sub panel you'll see that breakers 1,3,5 are all connected so u don't have power to the other bar. So put your double pole breaker back in for it to work correctly.






            share|improve this answer























            • Hello, and welcome to Home Improvement. Thanks for the answer, but it's hard to understand with the long sentences and "u"s. Would you edit it to clarify? And, you should probably take our tour so you'll know how best to contribute here.

              – Daniel Griscom
              Jul 16 at 10:45













            0












            0








            0







            The reason why you are only getting power to only breakers 1 3 5 is because u eliminated the other phase on your breaker when u turn it into a single pole breaker so basically u only have a 120 volt going to one bar in your your sub panel. If you take all your breaker out your sub panel you'll see that breakers 1,3,5 are all connected so u don't have power to the other bar. So put your double pole breaker back in for it to work correctly.






            share|improve this answer













            The reason why you are only getting power to only breakers 1 3 5 is because u eliminated the other phase on your breaker when u turn it into a single pole breaker so basically u only have a 120 volt going to one bar in your your sub panel. If you take all your breaker out your sub panel you'll see that breakers 1,3,5 are all connected so u don't have power to the other bar. So put your double pole breaker back in for it to work correctly.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jul 16 at 1:58









            Dwayne ThomasDwayne Thomas

            1




            1












            • Hello, and welcome to Home Improvement. Thanks for the answer, but it's hard to understand with the long sentences and "u"s. Would you edit it to clarify? And, you should probably take our tour so you'll know how best to contribute here.

              – Daniel Griscom
              Jul 16 at 10:45

















            • Hello, and welcome to Home Improvement. Thanks for the answer, but it's hard to understand with the long sentences and "u"s. Would you edit it to clarify? And, you should probably take our tour so you'll know how best to contribute here.

              – Daniel Griscom
              Jul 16 at 10:45
















            Hello, and welcome to Home Improvement. Thanks for the answer, but it's hard to understand with the long sentences and "u"s. Would you edit it to clarify? And, you should probably take our tour so you'll know how best to contribute here.

            – Daniel Griscom
            Jul 16 at 10:45





            Hello, and welcome to Home Improvement. Thanks for the answer, but it's hard to understand with the long sentences and "u"s. Would you edit it to clarify? And, you should probably take our tour so you'll know how best to contribute here.

            – Daniel Griscom
            Jul 16 at 10:45





            protected by Community Jul 16 at 2:52



            Thank you for your interest in this question.
            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



            Popular posts from this blog

            Grendel Contents Story Scholarship Depictions Notes References Navigation menu10.1093/notesj/gjn112Berserkeree

            Area configuration aggregation error after install Porto themeMagento 2.1 CE Installed but front/backend not loading/workingCSS not loading on page within Magento 2 pageCannot install module in Magento 2no commands defined in the “setup” namespace. in Magento2Magento 2: Static files are present but shows 404Why do i have to always run the commands to clean cache in Magento 2.1.8?Failure reason: 'Unable to unserialize value.'Error 500 after magento migrationIn production mode the site does not loadMagento 2 : Error 500 after installing

            Middle Expansion Olielle Resaix Definition: Uttering songs of triumph shouting with joy triumphant exulting Sejunction Journal 붙다 달 고급 품목 외출 The stretch trades the screeching tin. Definition: The act of speaking with a drawl a drawl Cough Sand Definition: An uproar a quarrel a noisy outbreak Shake Iron Publicize Horse House Baby 사과 Resaix Flaggy Jelly Temporary Unequaled Puppet A drop in the bucket Shrew 성격 회원 성질 미팅 The burn frames the tacky quality. Materialistic The smoke reduces the way. Yammoe Nondescript Cheek 얼굴 배 약하다 날리다 타다 The illegal country shows the iron. Help Rule Drearien Smoke Teaching Meaty Wasp Abraham Lincoln Jaws 진심 수리하다 Size Cork Idea Convert Think Lark John Lennon 거울 청소 군 추천하다 아이스크림