Why did Harry Potter get a bedroom?How did Fawkes get into the Chamber of Secrets?Why Did Dudley Have to Have His Piggy Tail Surgically Removed?Did Harry Potter lose Voldemort's powers when he lost his connection to Voldemort?Why did the Dursleys give Harry glasses?How did Hedwig know the Dursleys would have a Christmas present for Harry?Harry Potter: Why are there no “intelligent” Muggles?What magic forced Uncle Vernon to suddenly let go of Harry as though shocked?Why did Harry and Ron take Gilderoy Lockhart with them into the Chamber of Secrets?How did the Weasleys afford a new wand for Ginny (or anything else for that matter) in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets?To what extent does the wizarding world know about the events from the Harry Potter books?

Construct, in some manner, a four-dimensional "RegionPlot"

What impact would a dragon the size of Asia have on the environment?

Animal Shelter Management C++

Representations of secret keys on Curve25519

Can you perfectly wrap a cube with this blocky shape?

How to determine the optimal threshold to achieve the highest accuracy

Can a dragon's breath weapon pass through Leomund's Tiny Hut?

How to remove the first colon ':' from a timestamp?

Is this artwork (used in a video game) real?

Why do so many pure math PhD students drop out or leave academia, compared to applied mathematics PhDs?

Is there an English equivalent for "Les carottes sont cuites", while keeping the vegetable reference?

What details should I consider before agreeing for part of my salary to be 'retained' by employer?

Why does FFmpeg choose 10+20+20 ms instead of an even 16 ms for 60 fps GIF images?

Is the Gritty Realism variant incompatible with dungeon-based adventures?

What happens if there is no space for entry stamp in the passport for US visa?

FPGA CPU's, how to find the max speed?

Can a Resident Assistant Be Told to Ignore a Lawful Order?

Does the Intel 8085 CPU use real memory addresses?

Why does "git status" show I'm on the master branch and "git branch" does not?

Credit card details stolen every 1-2 years. What am I doing wrong?

Using two linked programs, output ordinal numbers up to n

Can I remove the doors before installing a sliding patio doors frame?

Kepler space telescope planets detection

What powers the air required for pneumatic brakes in aircraft?



Why did Harry Potter get a bedroom?


How did Fawkes get into the Chamber of Secrets?Why Did Dudley Have to Have His Piggy Tail Surgically Removed?Did Harry Potter lose Voldemort's powers when he lost his connection to Voldemort?Why did the Dursleys give Harry glasses?How did Hedwig know the Dursleys would have a Christmas present for Harry?Harry Potter: Why are there no “intelligent” Muggles?What magic forced Uncle Vernon to suddenly let go of Harry as though shocked?Why did Harry and Ron take Gilderoy Lockhart with them into the Chamber of Secrets?How did the Weasleys afford a new wand for Ginny (or anything else for that matter) in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets?To what extent does the wizarding world know about the events from the Harry Potter books?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








64















In Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Uncle Vernon says:




We even let you have Dudley's second bedroom purely out of the goodness of our hearts.




There is plenty of evidence that there's no "goodness in their hearts" when it comes to Harry. They had no problem with him living under the stairs for almost 11 years. Why did that change?



Did someone in the wizarding world force them?



Did they decide to use the cupboard under the stairs for something else?



Or (much less likely), did they develop a tiny bit of sympathy for Harry?










share|improve this question



















  • 9





    I think it's more a joke, since it implies that previously, not only did Harry not have a bedroom, but Dudley had two for some reason, so it further emphasizes their cruelty, since Harry's lack of bedroom was not due to lack of space in the house, but just to overall dickishness.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    Jul 8 at 15:25






  • 1





    It's called guilt.

    – Karl
    Jul 9 at 22:00






  • 10





    @Karl it is absolutely not guilt, the books are extremely clear on that.

    – DavidS
    Jul 10 at 10:04







  • 2





    For the remainder of "Philosopher's Stone" Dursleys had nightmares about Hagrid in Child Protection Services hat.

    – Darth Hunterix
    Jul 10 at 10:28











  • @DavidS I've just stumbled over the first book in my basement an read it again. Please tell me: where is the book so clear about that?

    – Karl
    Jul 10 at 19:04

















64















In Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Uncle Vernon says:




We even let you have Dudley's second bedroom purely out of the goodness of our hearts.




There is plenty of evidence that there's no "goodness in their hearts" when it comes to Harry. They had no problem with him living under the stairs for almost 11 years. Why did that change?



Did someone in the wizarding world force them?



Did they decide to use the cupboard under the stairs for something else?



Or (much less likely), did they develop a tiny bit of sympathy for Harry?










share|improve this question



















  • 9





    I think it's more a joke, since it implies that previously, not only did Harry not have a bedroom, but Dudley had two for some reason, so it further emphasizes their cruelty, since Harry's lack of bedroom was not due to lack of space in the house, but just to overall dickishness.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    Jul 8 at 15:25






  • 1





    It's called guilt.

    – Karl
    Jul 9 at 22:00






  • 10





    @Karl it is absolutely not guilt, the books are extremely clear on that.

    – DavidS
    Jul 10 at 10:04







  • 2





    For the remainder of "Philosopher's Stone" Dursleys had nightmares about Hagrid in Child Protection Services hat.

    – Darth Hunterix
    Jul 10 at 10:28











  • @DavidS I've just stumbled over the first book in my basement an read it again. Please tell me: where is the book so clear about that?

    – Karl
    Jul 10 at 19:04













64












64








64


3






In Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Uncle Vernon says:




We even let you have Dudley's second bedroom purely out of the goodness of our hearts.




There is plenty of evidence that there's no "goodness in their hearts" when it comes to Harry. They had no problem with him living under the stairs for almost 11 years. Why did that change?



Did someone in the wizarding world force them?



Did they decide to use the cupboard under the stairs for something else?



Or (much less likely), did they develop a tiny bit of sympathy for Harry?










share|improve this question
















In Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Uncle Vernon says:




We even let you have Dudley's second bedroom purely out of the goodness of our hearts.




There is plenty of evidence that there's no "goodness in their hearts" when it comes to Harry. They had no problem with him living under the stairs for almost 11 years. Why did that change?



Did someone in the wizarding world force them?



Did they decide to use the cupboard under the stairs for something else?



Or (much less likely), did they develop a tiny bit of sympathy for Harry?







harry-potter






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 9 at 8:52









TheLethalCarrot

68.2k29 gold badges446 silver badges490 bronze badges




68.2k29 gold badges446 silver badges490 bronze badges










asked Jul 8 at 5:54









LevenTrekLevenTrek

4,2712 gold badges14 silver badges49 bronze badges




4,2712 gold badges14 silver badges49 bronze badges







  • 9





    I think it's more a joke, since it implies that previously, not only did Harry not have a bedroom, but Dudley had two for some reason, so it further emphasizes their cruelty, since Harry's lack of bedroom was not due to lack of space in the house, but just to overall dickishness.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    Jul 8 at 15:25






  • 1





    It's called guilt.

    – Karl
    Jul 9 at 22:00






  • 10





    @Karl it is absolutely not guilt, the books are extremely clear on that.

    – DavidS
    Jul 10 at 10:04







  • 2





    For the remainder of "Philosopher's Stone" Dursleys had nightmares about Hagrid in Child Protection Services hat.

    – Darth Hunterix
    Jul 10 at 10:28











  • @DavidS I've just stumbled over the first book in my basement an read it again. Please tell me: where is the book so clear about that?

    – Karl
    Jul 10 at 19:04












  • 9





    I think it's more a joke, since it implies that previously, not only did Harry not have a bedroom, but Dudley had two for some reason, so it further emphasizes their cruelty, since Harry's lack of bedroom was not due to lack of space in the house, but just to overall dickishness.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    Jul 8 at 15:25






  • 1





    It's called guilt.

    – Karl
    Jul 9 at 22:00






  • 10





    @Karl it is absolutely not guilt, the books are extremely clear on that.

    – DavidS
    Jul 10 at 10:04







  • 2





    For the remainder of "Philosopher's Stone" Dursleys had nightmares about Hagrid in Child Protection Services hat.

    – Darth Hunterix
    Jul 10 at 10:28











  • @DavidS I've just stumbled over the first book in my basement an read it again. Please tell me: where is the book so clear about that?

    – Karl
    Jul 10 at 19:04







9




9





I think it's more a joke, since it implies that previously, not only did Harry not have a bedroom, but Dudley had two for some reason, so it further emphasizes their cruelty, since Harry's lack of bedroom was not due to lack of space in the house, but just to overall dickishness.

– Darrel Hoffman
Jul 8 at 15:25





I think it's more a joke, since it implies that previously, not only did Harry not have a bedroom, but Dudley had two for some reason, so it further emphasizes their cruelty, since Harry's lack of bedroom was not due to lack of space in the house, but just to overall dickishness.

– Darrel Hoffman
Jul 8 at 15:25




1




1





It's called guilt.

– Karl
Jul 9 at 22:00





It's called guilt.

– Karl
Jul 9 at 22:00




10




10





@Karl it is absolutely not guilt, the books are extremely clear on that.

– DavidS
Jul 10 at 10:04






@Karl it is absolutely not guilt, the books are extremely clear on that.

– DavidS
Jul 10 at 10:04





2




2





For the remainder of "Philosopher's Stone" Dursleys had nightmares about Hagrid in Child Protection Services hat.

– Darth Hunterix
Jul 10 at 10:28





For the remainder of "Philosopher's Stone" Dursleys had nightmares about Hagrid in Child Protection Services hat.

– Darth Hunterix
Jul 10 at 10:28













@DavidS I've just stumbled over the first book in my basement an read it again. Please tell me: where is the book so clear about that?

– Karl
Jul 10 at 19:04





@DavidS I've just stumbled over the first book in my basement an read it again. Please tell me: where is the book so clear about that?

– Karl
Jul 10 at 19:04










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















114














The Dursleys moved him because they were worried that Dumbledore (or whoever was sending them Harry's acceptance letters) had made it clear that they were aware that Harry was being kept in a cupboard.




Mr H. Potter
The Cupboard under the Stairs

4 Privet Drive

Little Whinging

Surrey



Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone




Shortly after they moved him, the letters reflected the change, even if they were still a bit sarcastic.




‘Er – yes, Harry – about this cupboard. Your aunt and I have been thinking … you’re really getting a bit big for it … we think it might be nice if you moved into Dudley’s second bedroom.’

‘Why?’ said Harry.

‘Don’t ask questions!’ snapped his uncle. ‘Take this stuff upstairs, now.’




and




‘There’s another one! Mr H. Potter, The Smallest Bedroom, 4 Privet Drive –’





If we're talking specifically about the films, there was also an additional exposition scene in the original Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone screenplay that was written but not filmed that shows how concerned his aunt and uncle are about the fact that the letter-sender can see where he sleeps.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 51





    So it was a "oh crap, this wizard knows and might kill us for being such horrible parents"? Awesome

    – LevenTrek
    Jul 8 at 6:18






  • 103





    @LevenTrek - It's also a middle class 'keeping up appearances' deal. They don't want people to think badly of them, even people they don't like.

    – Valorum
    Jul 8 at 6:31






  • 8





    You might also want to mention that the constant moving of both Harry and the family as a whole was an attempt to throw the letter-senders off the trail. "If they don't know where he lives then they can't reach him" as well as hoping that not replying would deter them enough to stop.

    – The Dark Lord
    Jul 8 at 8:31






  • 7





    Note - that dialogue from Petunia is in the book somewhere, I'm pretty sure.

    – DavidS
    Jul 8 at 8:44






  • 11





    @LevenTrek - Vernon and Petunia Dursley could be accused of many things, but being "parents" to Harry Potter would not be one of them.

    – Bob Jarvis
    Jul 8 at 16:21


















32














They gave it to him in the first book, after the incident with the letters.. but as to keeping it, I don't remember it being expressly stated, but I believe it was due to them being afraid of what he might do with his magic, once he learned he had it, and how to use it.



From the same book:




Underage wizards weren’t allowed to use magic outside of school. Harry hadn’t told the Dursleys this; he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick.




(Emphasis added)



Since that was where he stayed before, it seems pretty consistent with that being the reason.



In the first book, near the end, we see:




“Hope you have—er—a good holiday,” said Hermione, looking uncertainly after Uncle Vernon, shocked that anyone could be so unpleasant.



“Oh, I will,” said Harry, and they were surprised at the grin that was spreading over his face. “They don’t know we’re not allowed to use magic at home. I’m going to have a lot of fun with Dudley this summer…”




Beyond that, I think they were somewhat afraid of what the Wizardling World might do in response to their 'Hero' being abused.. That didn't result in good treatment, but at least the over-the-top 'keep him under the stairs' issue went away. Overall, a lesser version of the protection he gets at the end of Prisoner.




“It’s not,” said Harry cheerfully. “It’s a letter from my godfather.”



“Godfather?” sputtered Uncle Vernon. “You haven’t got a godfather!”



“Yes, I have,” said Harry brightly. “He was my mum and dad’s best friend. He’s a convicted murderer, but he’s broken out of wizard prison and he’s on the run. He likes to keep in touch with me, though… keep up with my news… check if I’m happy…”



And, grinning broadly at the look of horror on Uncle Vernon’s face, Harry set off toward the station exit, Hedwig rattling along in front of him, for what looked like a much better summer than the last.







share|improve this answer


















  • 10





    To clarify they were “somewhat” afraid: A giant that can render rifles useless and can create piggy tails on their sons back.

    – atayenel
    Jul 8 at 10:34











  • Of course, this quote "he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick" doesn't make any sense. Being scared of his magic is a reason to do what they did (lock his wand away), not to not lock him up with the thing that allows him to do magic.

    – Anthony Grist
    Jul 9 at 12:56











  • @AnthonyGrist The Dursleys have no idea of the rules of magic and have seen lots of magic being performed without wands, both by Harry on many occasions and by Hagrid with his umbrella.

    – 520
    Jul 9 at 14:53






  • 2





    @520 Petunia grew up with a witch, she knows more than she likes to pretend (as we see on a few occasions in the books). Depriving Harry of his wand, books, etc. is clearly intended to prevent him from doing magic. If they think he doesn't need a wand then locking it away is pointless, and that's still not a good reason to then put him in the same location as spellbooks, a wand, potionmaking supplies, etc.

    – Anthony Grist
    Jul 9 at 15:35







  • 2





    @AnthonyGrist That's called a figure of speech.

    – Karl
    Jul 9 at 22:08













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215658%2fwhy-did-harry-potter-get-a-bedroom%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









114














The Dursleys moved him because they were worried that Dumbledore (or whoever was sending them Harry's acceptance letters) had made it clear that they were aware that Harry was being kept in a cupboard.




Mr H. Potter
The Cupboard under the Stairs

4 Privet Drive

Little Whinging

Surrey



Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone




Shortly after they moved him, the letters reflected the change, even if they were still a bit sarcastic.




‘Er – yes, Harry – about this cupboard. Your aunt and I have been thinking … you’re really getting a bit big for it … we think it might be nice if you moved into Dudley’s second bedroom.’

‘Why?’ said Harry.

‘Don’t ask questions!’ snapped his uncle. ‘Take this stuff upstairs, now.’




and




‘There’s another one! Mr H. Potter, The Smallest Bedroom, 4 Privet Drive –’





If we're talking specifically about the films, there was also an additional exposition scene in the original Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone screenplay that was written but not filmed that shows how concerned his aunt and uncle are about the fact that the letter-sender can see where he sleeps.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 51





    So it was a "oh crap, this wizard knows and might kill us for being such horrible parents"? Awesome

    – LevenTrek
    Jul 8 at 6:18






  • 103





    @LevenTrek - It's also a middle class 'keeping up appearances' deal. They don't want people to think badly of them, even people they don't like.

    – Valorum
    Jul 8 at 6:31






  • 8





    You might also want to mention that the constant moving of both Harry and the family as a whole was an attempt to throw the letter-senders off the trail. "If they don't know where he lives then they can't reach him" as well as hoping that not replying would deter them enough to stop.

    – The Dark Lord
    Jul 8 at 8:31






  • 7





    Note - that dialogue from Petunia is in the book somewhere, I'm pretty sure.

    – DavidS
    Jul 8 at 8:44






  • 11





    @LevenTrek - Vernon and Petunia Dursley could be accused of many things, but being "parents" to Harry Potter would not be one of them.

    – Bob Jarvis
    Jul 8 at 16:21















114














The Dursleys moved him because they were worried that Dumbledore (or whoever was sending them Harry's acceptance letters) had made it clear that they were aware that Harry was being kept in a cupboard.




Mr H. Potter
The Cupboard under the Stairs

4 Privet Drive

Little Whinging

Surrey



Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone




Shortly after they moved him, the letters reflected the change, even if they were still a bit sarcastic.




‘Er – yes, Harry – about this cupboard. Your aunt and I have been thinking … you’re really getting a bit big for it … we think it might be nice if you moved into Dudley’s second bedroom.’

‘Why?’ said Harry.

‘Don’t ask questions!’ snapped his uncle. ‘Take this stuff upstairs, now.’




and




‘There’s another one! Mr H. Potter, The Smallest Bedroom, 4 Privet Drive –’





If we're talking specifically about the films, there was also an additional exposition scene in the original Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone screenplay that was written but not filmed that shows how concerned his aunt and uncle are about the fact that the letter-sender can see where he sleeps.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 51





    So it was a "oh crap, this wizard knows and might kill us for being such horrible parents"? Awesome

    – LevenTrek
    Jul 8 at 6:18






  • 103





    @LevenTrek - It's also a middle class 'keeping up appearances' deal. They don't want people to think badly of them, even people they don't like.

    – Valorum
    Jul 8 at 6:31






  • 8





    You might also want to mention that the constant moving of both Harry and the family as a whole was an attempt to throw the letter-senders off the trail. "If they don't know where he lives then they can't reach him" as well as hoping that not replying would deter them enough to stop.

    – The Dark Lord
    Jul 8 at 8:31






  • 7





    Note - that dialogue from Petunia is in the book somewhere, I'm pretty sure.

    – DavidS
    Jul 8 at 8:44






  • 11





    @LevenTrek - Vernon and Petunia Dursley could be accused of many things, but being "parents" to Harry Potter would not be one of them.

    – Bob Jarvis
    Jul 8 at 16:21













114












114








114







The Dursleys moved him because they were worried that Dumbledore (or whoever was sending them Harry's acceptance letters) had made it clear that they were aware that Harry was being kept in a cupboard.




Mr H. Potter
The Cupboard under the Stairs

4 Privet Drive

Little Whinging

Surrey



Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone




Shortly after they moved him, the letters reflected the change, even if they were still a bit sarcastic.




‘Er – yes, Harry – about this cupboard. Your aunt and I have been thinking … you’re really getting a bit big for it … we think it might be nice if you moved into Dudley’s second bedroom.’

‘Why?’ said Harry.

‘Don’t ask questions!’ snapped his uncle. ‘Take this stuff upstairs, now.’




and




‘There’s another one! Mr H. Potter, The Smallest Bedroom, 4 Privet Drive –’





If we're talking specifically about the films, there was also an additional exposition scene in the original Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone screenplay that was written but not filmed that shows how concerned his aunt and uncle are about the fact that the letter-sender can see where he sleeps.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer















The Dursleys moved him because they were worried that Dumbledore (or whoever was sending them Harry's acceptance letters) had made it clear that they were aware that Harry was being kept in a cupboard.




Mr H. Potter
The Cupboard under the Stairs

4 Privet Drive

Little Whinging

Surrey



Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone




Shortly after they moved him, the letters reflected the change, even if they were still a bit sarcastic.




‘Er – yes, Harry – about this cupboard. Your aunt and I have been thinking … you’re really getting a bit big for it … we think it might be nice if you moved into Dudley’s second bedroom.’

‘Why?’ said Harry.

‘Don’t ask questions!’ snapped his uncle. ‘Take this stuff upstairs, now.’




and




‘There’s another one! Mr H. Potter, The Smallest Bedroom, 4 Privet Drive –’





If we're talking specifically about the films, there was also an additional exposition scene in the original Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone screenplay that was written but not filmed that shows how concerned his aunt and uncle are about the fact that the letter-sender can see where he sleeps.



enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jul 8 at 9:48

























answered Jul 8 at 6:10









ValorumValorum

432k122 gold badges3192 silver badges3366 bronze badges




432k122 gold badges3192 silver badges3366 bronze badges







  • 51





    So it was a "oh crap, this wizard knows and might kill us for being such horrible parents"? Awesome

    – LevenTrek
    Jul 8 at 6:18






  • 103





    @LevenTrek - It's also a middle class 'keeping up appearances' deal. They don't want people to think badly of them, even people they don't like.

    – Valorum
    Jul 8 at 6:31






  • 8





    You might also want to mention that the constant moving of both Harry and the family as a whole was an attempt to throw the letter-senders off the trail. "If they don't know where he lives then they can't reach him" as well as hoping that not replying would deter them enough to stop.

    – The Dark Lord
    Jul 8 at 8:31






  • 7





    Note - that dialogue from Petunia is in the book somewhere, I'm pretty sure.

    – DavidS
    Jul 8 at 8:44






  • 11





    @LevenTrek - Vernon and Petunia Dursley could be accused of many things, but being "parents" to Harry Potter would not be one of them.

    – Bob Jarvis
    Jul 8 at 16:21












  • 51





    So it was a "oh crap, this wizard knows and might kill us for being such horrible parents"? Awesome

    – LevenTrek
    Jul 8 at 6:18






  • 103





    @LevenTrek - It's also a middle class 'keeping up appearances' deal. They don't want people to think badly of them, even people they don't like.

    – Valorum
    Jul 8 at 6:31






  • 8





    You might also want to mention that the constant moving of both Harry and the family as a whole was an attempt to throw the letter-senders off the trail. "If they don't know where he lives then they can't reach him" as well as hoping that not replying would deter them enough to stop.

    – The Dark Lord
    Jul 8 at 8:31






  • 7





    Note - that dialogue from Petunia is in the book somewhere, I'm pretty sure.

    – DavidS
    Jul 8 at 8:44






  • 11





    @LevenTrek - Vernon and Petunia Dursley could be accused of many things, but being "parents" to Harry Potter would not be one of them.

    – Bob Jarvis
    Jul 8 at 16:21







51




51





So it was a "oh crap, this wizard knows and might kill us for being such horrible parents"? Awesome

– LevenTrek
Jul 8 at 6:18





So it was a "oh crap, this wizard knows and might kill us for being such horrible parents"? Awesome

– LevenTrek
Jul 8 at 6:18




103




103





@LevenTrek - It's also a middle class 'keeping up appearances' deal. They don't want people to think badly of them, even people they don't like.

– Valorum
Jul 8 at 6:31





@LevenTrek - It's also a middle class 'keeping up appearances' deal. They don't want people to think badly of them, even people they don't like.

– Valorum
Jul 8 at 6:31




8




8





You might also want to mention that the constant moving of both Harry and the family as a whole was an attempt to throw the letter-senders off the trail. "If they don't know where he lives then they can't reach him" as well as hoping that not replying would deter them enough to stop.

– The Dark Lord
Jul 8 at 8:31





You might also want to mention that the constant moving of both Harry and the family as a whole was an attempt to throw the letter-senders off the trail. "If they don't know where he lives then they can't reach him" as well as hoping that not replying would deter them enough to stop.

– The Dark Lord
Jul 8 at 8:31




7




7





Note - that dialogue from Petunia is in the book somewhere, I'm pretty sure.

– DavidS
Jul 8 at 8:44





Note - that dialogue from Petunia is in the book somewhere, I'm pretty sure.

– DavidS
Jul 8 at 8:44




11




11





@LevenTrek - Vernon and Petunia Dursley could be accused of many things, but being "parents" to Harry Potter would not be one of them.

– Bob Jarvis
Jul 8 at 16:21





@LevenTrek - Vernon and Petunia Dursley could be accused of many things, but being "parents" to Harry Potter would not be one of them.

– Bob Jarvis
Jul 8 at 16:21













32














They gave it to him in the first book, after the incident with the letters.. but as to keeping it, I don't remember it being expressly stated, but I believe it was due to them being afraid of what he might do with his magic, once he learned he had it, and how to use it.



From the same book:




Underage wizards weren’t allowed to use magic outside of school. Harry hadn’t told the Dursleys this; he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick.




(Emphasis added)



Since that was where he stayed before, it seems pretty consistent with that being the reason.



In the first book, near the end, we see:




“Hope you have—er—a good holiday,” said Hermione, looking uncertainly after Uncle Vernon, shocked that anyone could be so unpleasant.



“Oh, I will,” said Harry, and they were surprised at the grin that was spreading over his face. “They don’t know we’re not allowed to use magic at home. I’m going to have a lot of fun with Dudley this summer…”




Beyond that, I think they were somewhat afraid of what the Wizardling World might do in response to their 'Hero' being abused.. That didn't result in good treatment, but at least the over-the-top 'keep him under the stairs' issue went away. Overall, a lesser version of the protection he gets at the end of Prisoner.




“It’s not,” said Harry cheerfully. “It’s a letter from my godfather.”



“Godfather?” sputtered Uncle Vernon. “You haven’t got a godfather!”



“Yes, I have,” said Harry brightly. “He was my mum and dad’s best friend. He’s a convicted murderer, but he’s broken out of wizard prison and he’s on the run. He likes to keep in touch with me, though… keep up with my news… check if I’m happy…”



And, grinning broadly at the look of horror on Uncle Vernon’s face, Harry set off toward the station exit, Hedwig rattling along in front of him, for what looked like a much better summer than the last.







share|improve this answer


















  • 10





    To clarify they were “somewhat” afraid: A giant that can render rifles useless and can create piggy tails on their sons back.

    – atayenel
    Jul 8 at 10:34











  • Of course, this quote "he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick" doesn't make any sense. Being scared of his magic is a reason to do what they did (lock his wand away), not to not lock him up with the thing that allows him to do magic.

    – Anthony Grist
    Jul 9 at 12:56











  • @AnthonyGrist The Dursleys have no idea of the rules of magic and have seen lots of magic being performed without wands, both by Harry on many occasions and by Hagrid with his umbrella.

    – 520
    Jul 9 at 14:53






  • 2





    @520 Petunia grew up with a witch, she knows more than she likes to pretend (as we see on a few occasions in the books). Depriving Harry of his wand, books, etc. is clearly intended to prevent him from doing magic. If they think he doesn't need a wand then locking it away is pointless, and that's still not a good reason to then put him in the same location as spellbooks, a wand, potionmaking supplies, etc.

    – Anthony Grist
    Jul 9 at 15:35







  • 2





    @AnthonyGrist That's called a figure of speech.

    – Karl
    Jul 9 at 22:08















32














They gave it to him in the first book, after the incident with the letters.. but as to keeping it, I don't remember it being expressly stated, but I believe it was due to them being afraid of what he might do with his magic, once he learned he had it, and how to use it.



From the same book:




Underage wizards weren’t allowed to use magic outside of school. Harry hadn’t told the Dursleys this; he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick.




(Emphasis added)



Since that was where he stayed before, it seems pretty consistent with that being the reason.



In the first book, near the end, we see:




“Hope you have—er—a good holiday,” said Hermione, looking uncertainly after Uncle Vernon, shocked that anyone could be so unpleasant.



“Oh, I will,” said Harry, and they were surprised at the grin that was spreading over his face. “They don’t know we’re not allowed to use magic at home. I’m going to have a lot of fun with Dudley this summer…”




Beyond that, I think they were somewhat afraid of what the Wizardling World might do in response to their 'Hero' being abused.. That didn't result in good treatment, but at least the over-the-top 'keep him under the stairs' issue went away. Overall, a lesser version of the protection he gets at the end of Prisoner.




“It’s not,” said Harry cheerfully. “It’s a letter from my godfather.”



“Godfather?” sputtered Uncle Vernon. “You haven’t got a godfather!”



“Yes, I have,” said Harry brightly. “He was my mum and dad’s best friend. He’s a convicted murderer, but he’s broken out of wizard prison and he’s on the run. He likes to keep in touch with me, though… keep up with my news… check if I’m happy…”



And, grinning broadly at the look of horror on Uncle Vernon’s face, Harry set off toward the station exit, Hedwig rattling along in front of him, for what looked like a much better summer than the last.







share|improve this answer


















  • 10





    To clarify they were “somewhat” afraid: A giant that can render rifles useless and can create piggy tails on their sons back.

    – atayenel
    Jul 8 at 10:34











  • Of course, this quote "he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick" doesn't make any sense. Being scared of his magic is a reason to do what they did (lock his wand away), not to not lock him up with the thing that allows him to do magic.

    – Anthony Grist
    Jul 9 at 12:56











  • @AnthonyGrist The Dursleys have no idea of the rules of magic and have seen lots of magic being performed without wands, both by Harry on many occasions and by Hagrid with his umbrella.

    – 520
    Jul 9 at 14:53






  • 2





    @520 Petunia grew up with a witch, she knows more than she likes to pretend (as we see on a few occasions in the books). Depriving Harry of his wand, books, etc. is clearly intended to prevent him from doing magic. If they think he doesn't need a wand then locking it away is pointless, and that's still not a good reason to then put him in the same location as spellbooks, a wand, potionmaking supplies, etc.

    – Anthony Grist
    Jul 9 at 15:35







  • 2





    @AnthonyGrist That's called a figure of speech.

    – Karl
    Jul 9 at 22:08













32












32








32







They gave it to him in the first book, after the incident with the letters.. but as to keeping it, I don't remember it being expressly stated, but I believe it was due to them being afraid of what he might do with his magic, once he learned he had it, and how to use it.



From the same book:




Underage wizards weren’t allowed to use magic outside of school. Harry hadn’t told the Dursleys this; he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick.




(Emphasis added)



Since that was where he stayed before, it seems pretty consistent with that being the reason.



In the first book, near the end, we see:




“Hope you have—er—a good holiday,” said Hermione, looking uncertainly after Uncle Vernon, shocked that anyone could be so unpleasant.



“Oh, I will,” said Harry, and they were surprised at the grin that was spreading over his face. “They don’t know we’re not allowed to use magic at home. I’m going to have a lot of fun with Dudley this summer…”




Beyond that, I think they were somewhat afraid of what the Wizardling World might do in response to their 'Hero' being abused.. That didn't result in good treatment, but at least the over-the-top 'keep him under the stairs' issue went away. Overall, a lesser version of the protection he gets at the end of Prisoner.




“It’s not,” said Harry cheerfully. “It’s a letter from my godfather.”



“Godfather?” sputtered Uncle Vernon. “You haven’t got a godfather!”



“Yes, I have,” said Harry brightly. “He was my mum and dad’s best friend. He’s a convicted murderer, but he’s broken out of wizard prison and he’s on the run. He likes to keep in touch with me, though… keep up with my news… check if I’m happy…”



And, grinning broadly at the look of horror on Uncle Vernon’s face, Harry set off toward the station exit, Hedwig rattling along in front of him, for what looked like a much better summer than the last.







share|improve this answer













They gave it to him in the first book, after the incident with the letters.. but as to keeping it, I don't remember it being expressly stated, but I believe it was due to them being afraid of what he might do with his magic, once he learned he had it, and how to use it.



From the same book:




Underage wizards weren’t allowed to use magic outside of school. Harry hadn’t told the Dursleys this; he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick.




(Emphasis added)



Since that was where he stayed before, it seems pretty consistent with that being the reason.



In the first book, near the end, we see:




“Hope you have—er—a good holiday,” said Hermione, looking uncertainly after Uncle Vernon, shocked that anyone could be so unpleasant.



“Oh, I will,” said Harry, and they were surprised at the grin that was spreading over his face. “They don’t know we’re not allowed to use magic at home. I’m going to have a lot of fun with Dudley this summer…”




Beyond that, I think they were somewhat afraid of what the Wizardling World might do in response to their 'Hero' being abused.. That didn't result in good treatment, but at least the over-the-top 'keep him under the stairs' issue went away. Overall, a lesser version of the protection he gets at the end of Prisoner.




“It’s not,” said Harry cheerfully. “It’s a letter from my godfather.”



“Godfather?” sputtered Uncle Vernon. “You haven’t got a godfather!”



“Yes, I have,” said Harry brightly. “He was my mum and dad’s best friend. He’s a convicted murderer, but he’s broken out of wizard prison and he’s on the run. He likes to keep in touch with me, though… keep up with my news… check if I’m happy…”



And, grinning broadly at the look of horror on Uncle Vernon’s face, Harry set off toward the station exit, Hedwig rattling along in front of him, for what looked like a much better summer than the last.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jul 8 at 6:07









K-H-WK-H-W

52.3k7 gold badges211 silver badges255 bronze badges




52.3k7 gold badges211 silver badges255 bronze badges







  • 10





    To clarify they were “somewhat” afraid: A giant that can render rifles useless and can create piggy tails on their sons back.

    – atayenel
    Jul 8 at 10:34











  • Of course, this quote "he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick" doesn't make any sense. Being scared of his magic is a reason to do what they did (lock his wand away), not to not lock him up with the thing that allows him to do magic.

    – Anthony Grist
    Jul 9 at 12:56











  • @AnthonyGrist The Dursleys have no idea of the rules of magic and have seen lots of magic being performed without wands, both by Harry on many occasions and by Hagrid with his umbrella.

    – 520
    Jul 9 at 14:53






  • 2





    @520 Petunia grew up with a witch, she knows more than she likes to pretend (as we see on a few occasions in the books). Depriving Harry of his wand, books, etc. is clearly intended to prevent him from doing magic. If they think he doesn't need a wand then locking it away is pointless, and that's still not a good reason to then put him in the same location as spellbooks, a wand, potionmaking supplies, etc.

    – Anthony Grist
    Jul 9 at 15:35







  • 2





    @AnthonyGrist That's called a figure of speech.

    – Karl
    Jul 9 at 22:08












  • 10





    To clarify they were “somewhat” afraid: A giant that can render rifles useless and can create piggy tails on their sons back.

    – atayenel
    Jul 8 at 10:34











  • Of course, this quote "he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick" doesn't make any sense. Being scared of his magic is a reason to do what they did (lock his wand away), not to not lock him up with the thing that allows him to do magic.

    – Anthony Grist
    Jul 9 at 12:56











  • @AnthonyGrist The Dursleys have no idea of the rules of magic and have seen lots of magic being performed without wands, both by Harry on many occasions and by Hagrid with his umbrella.

    – 520
    Jul 9 at 14:53






  • 2





    @520 Petunia grew up with a witch, she knows more than she likes to pretend (as we see on a few occasions in the books). Depriving Harry of his wand, books, etc. is clearly intended to prevent him from doing magic. If they think he doesn't need a wand then locking it away is pointless, and that's still not a good reason to then put him in the same location as spellbooks, a wand, potionmaking supplies, etc.

    – Anthony Grist
    Jul 9 at 15:35







  • 2





    @AnthonyGrist That's called a figure of speech.

    – Karl
    Jul 9 at 22:08







10




10





To clarify they were “somewhat” afraid: A giant that can render rifles useless and can create piggy tails on their sons back.

– atayenel
Jul 8 at 10:34





To clarify they were “somewhat” afraid: A giant that can render rifles useless and can create piggy tails on their sons back.

– atayenel
Jul 8 at 10:34













Of course, this quote "he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick" doesn't make any sense. Being scared of his magic is a reason to do what they did (lock his wand away), not to not lock him up with the thing that allows him to do magic.

– Anthony Grist
Jul 9 at 12:56





Of course, this quote "he knew it was only their terror that he might turn them all into dung beetles that stopped them from locking him in the cupboard under the stairs with his wand and broomstick" doesn't make any sense. Being scared of his magic is a reason to do what they did (lock his wand away), not to not lock him up with the thing that allows him to do magic.

– Anthony Grist
Jul 9 at 12:56













@AnthonyGrist The Dursleys have no idea of the rules of magic and have seen lots of magic being performed without wands, both by Harry on many occasions and by Hagrid with his umbrella.

– 520
Jul 9 at 14:53





@AnthonyGrist The Dursleys have no idea of the rules of magic and have seen lots of magic being performed without wands, both by Harry on many occasions and by Hagrid with his umbrella.

– 520
Jul 9 at 14:53




2




2





@520 Petunia grew up with a witch, she knows more than she likes to pretend (as we see on a few occasions in the books). Depriving Harry of his wand, books, etc. is clearly intended to prevent him from doing magic. If they think he doesn't need a wand then locking it away is pointless, and that's still not a good reason to then put him in the same location as spellbooks, a wand, potionmaking supplies, etc.

– Anthony Grist
Jul 9 at 15:35






@520 Petunia grew up with a witch, she knows more than she likes to pretend (as we see on a few occasions in the books). Depriving Harry of his wand, books, etc. is clearly intended to prevent him from doing magic. If they think he doesn't need a wand then locking it away is pointless, and that's still not a good reason to then put him in the same location as spellbooks, a wand, potionmaking supplies, etc.

– Anthony Grist
Jul 9 at 15:35





2




2





@AnthonyGrist That's called a figure of speech.

– Karl
Jul 9 at 22:08





@AnthonyGrist That's called a figure of speech.

– Karl
Jul 9 at 22:08

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215658%2fwhy-did-harry-potter-get-a-bedroom%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?