What is the difference between position, displacement, and distance traveled?Distance and displacement of an object on a straight lineDetermine the distance from time-velocity graphIs in this case distance same as displacement?A car is moving in a circular trajectory with radius R=20m. The equation of motion is : x(t) = 15 + 8t – t^2Distance traveled from displacementDoes this calculation give displacement or distance?Displacement and position for a ball thrown up into the airA basic question in kinematicsTravelled displacement - how do we take care of the possibility that it might be negative?Why are all the other sub-displacements included into to the total displacement?
Would the Elder Wand have been able to destroy a Horcrux?
Japanese equivalent of a brain fart
Why do implementations of "stdint.h" disagree on the definition of UINT8_C?
Can I say "if a sequence is not bounded above, then it is divergent to positive infinity" without explicitly saying it's eventually increasing?
In a topological space if there exists a loop that cannot be contracted to a point does there exist a simple loop that cannot be contracted also?
French equivalent of "Make leaps and bounds"
sytemctl status log output
Should I take out a personal loan to pay off credit card debt?
What was the first multiprocessor x86 motherboard?
Did WWII Japanese soldiers engage in cannibalism of their enemies?
Why should I "believe in" weak solutions to PDEs?
Is it really ~648.69 km/s Delta-V to "Land" on the Surface of the Sun?
Why can I log in to my Facebook account with a misspelled email/password?
Unexpected route on a flight from USA to Europe
What word can be used to describe a bug in a movie?
Why are the inside diameters of some pipe larger than the stated size?
Can we use other things than single-word verbs in our dialog tags?
How would a family travel from Indiana to Texas in 1911?
Colleagues speaking another language and it impacts work
How quickly could a country build a tall concrete wall around a city?
Was there ever a difference between 'volo' and 'volo'?
How to explain to a team that the project they will work for 6 months will 100% fail?
Whats the name of this projection?
Why does the ultra long-end of a yield curve invert?
What is the difference between position, displacement, and distance traveled?
Distance and displacement of an object on a straight lineDetermine the distance from time-velocity graphIs in this case distance same as displacement?A car is moving in a circular trajectory with radius R=20m. The equation of motion is : x(t) = 15 + 8t – t^2Distance traveled from displacementDoes this calculation give displacement or distance?Displacement and position for a ball thrown up into the airA basic question in kinematicsTravelled displacement - how do we take care of the possibility that it might be negative?Why are all the other sub-displacements included into to the total displacement?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Suppose the question is somewhat like this:
If $v=8-4t$ and the position at time $t= 0 rm s$ is $2 rm m$, find the distance traveled, displacement, and final position at $t=3 rm s$
Since $text dx/text dt=v=8-4t$, then $text dx=(8-4t)text dt$. After integrating we find $x(t)-2=8t-2t^2$, and substituting the value of $t=3 rm s$ we get $x(3)=8 rm m$.
Is the answer that I found displacement, position or distance?
It can't be distance. I am sure of this. But is it position or displacement?
homework-and-exercises kinematics time distance displacement
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose the question is somewhat like this:
If $v=8-4t$ and the position at time $t= 0 rm s$ is $2 rm m$, find the distance traveled, displacement, and final position at $t=3 rm s$
Since $text dx/text dt=v=8-4t$, then $text dx=(8-4t)text dt$. After integrating we find $x(t)-2=8t-2t^2$, and substituting the value of $t=3 rm s$ we get $x(3)=8 rm m$.
Is the answer that I found displacement, position or distance?
It can't be distance. I am sure of this. But is it position or displacement?
homework-and-exercises kinematics time distance displacement
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose the question is somewhat like this:
If $v=8-4t$ and the position at time $t= 0 rm s$ is $2 rm m$, find the distance traveled, displacement, and final position at $t=3 rm s$
Since $text dx/text dt=v=8-4t$, then $text dx=(8-4t)text dt$. After integrating we find $x(t)-2=8t-2t^2$, and substituting the value of $t=3 rm s$ we get $x(3)=8 rm m$.
Is the answer that I found displacement, position or distance?
It can't be distance. I am sure of this. But is it position or displacement?
homework-and-exercises kinematics time distance displacement
$endgroup$
Suppose the question is somewhat like this:
If $v=8-4t$ and the position at time $t= 0 rm s$ is $2 rm m$, find the distance traveled, displacement, and final position at $t=3 rm s$
Since $text dx/text dt=v=8-4t$, then $text dx=(8-4t)text dt$. After integrating we find $x(t)-2=8t-2t^2$, and substituting the value of $t=3 rm s$ we get $x(3)=8 rm m$.
Is the answer that I found displacement, position or distance?
It can't be distance. I am sure of this. But is it position or displacement?
homework-and-exercises kinematics time distance displacement
homework-and-exercises kinematics time distance displacement
edited Jul 29 at 5:20
Qmechanic♦
112k13 gold badges216 silver badges1323 bronze badges
112k13 gold badges216 silver badges1323 bronze badges
asked Jul 28 at 20:28
NevilleNeville
354 bronze badges
354 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Position is a single point. Usually in space we indicate positions with coordinates like $(x,y,z)$ in Cartesian coordinates, $(r,phi,theta)$ in spherical coordinates, etc. We can also define the position as a vector, i.e. the position vector, that is a vector that points from the origin (subjectively defined) to the position of the particle in question. It could be $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$ using Cartesian coordinates, $mathbf r=rhat r$ using spherical coordinates$^*$, etc. In 1D there really isn't anything different between the position coordinate and the position vector, so you don't need to worry about the distinction in the problem you have described in your question.
Displacement is the change in position. It is a vector quantity; it is the difference between two position vectors. So, for example, if you go around a circle exactly one time, your displacement over that time is $0$. You can get the displacement at some time $t$ by integrating the instantaneous velocity over time:
$$Deltamathbf r=mathbf r(t)-mathbf r(t_0)=int_t_0^tmathbf v(tau)text dtau$$
Notice that $mathbf r(t)$ is the position at time $t$, and $mathbf r(t_0)$ is the initial position you are calculating the displacement with respect to. Hence the integral gives displacement since it is the difference between the final and initial position vectors.
Distance is a little different, but it is easy to understand. You can think of it as what the odometer in your car gives to you. It just tells you how far you have traveled without reference to some starting point. Going back to the example of going around a circle one time, your displacement was $0$, but the distance you traveled is equal to the circumference of the circle. Distance is a scalar value. You can determine it by integrating the speed over time:
$$D(t)=int_0^t|mathbf v(tau)|text dtau$$
Note that this integral is the same thing as the curve length of the path the particle moves along (i.e. the distance you have traveled).
These explanations should help you in your own problem.
$^*$ Note that the position vector in spherical coordinates is not $mathbf r=rhat r+phihatphi+thetahattheta$. This is because the position vector, by definition, points from the origin to the position (coordinate) of the particle. Therefore, the position vector can only have a radial component, i.e. $mathbf r=rhat r$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The base vectors in curvilinear coordinates are defined locally as $hat u = fracpartialmathbf r/partial upartialmathbf r/partial u$, so it's confusing to describe the position using them. One might think that since $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$, then $mathbf r=rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$, but that's wrong. It's simply $mathbf r=rhat r$.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 6:33
$begingroup$
@Wood Yeah that's what I have in my answer? Why are you commenting this?
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 11:02
$begingroup$
Because some people might wonder why it's $rhat r$ instead of $rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$. Maybe it's obvious to you, but it was confusing to me when I learned it and I'm sure it's confusing to other people too.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 21:55
$begingroup$
@Wood I wanted to give examples of ways we express position and position vectors. I don't think your point is essential to the question and answer. Nevertheless I have added a footnote. Thank you for the input and suggestions.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 22:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$colorbluetextPosition$:
$$colorbluevec p(t)$$$colorredtextDisplacement$†:
$$colorredvec p(t_2) - vec p(t_1)$$$colorgreentextDistance Traveled$:
$$colorgreendt$$
†Displacement is sometimes defined as the scalar $|vec p(t_2) - vec p(t_1)|$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is the difference between position, displacement, and distance
traveled?
Succinctly:
(1) the position of an object is a vector with tail at the origin of the coordinate system and head at the location of the object.
(2) the displacement of an object is the vector difference of the current position vector of the object and the position vector of the object at an earlier time. That is, the tail of this displacement vector is at the earlier position and the head is at the current position. The length of this vector is, generally, the shortest distance between the earlier and current positions.
(3) the distance traveled from the earlier position to the current position is not a vector but is, rather, a path length. There are an infinity of paths that an object may take from the earlier position to the current position and, in general, each has a different associated length.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So the 8m is displacement or distance?
The 8m is the position of the particle. The displacement is 6 m.
When you integrated the velocity function to get position you included a constant of integration (2 m) to account for the initial position of the particle, that is, its position at time t=0, which is given as 2 meters. If you omitted the constant of integration then you would be calculating the change in position, i.e. the displacement, and not the position. In this case the displacement would be 6 m.
Position can be considered as a point in a coordinate system relative to the origin of the coordinate system. The diagram below shows the position $s$ of the particle in a one dimensional coordinate system, relative to the origin of the system, s=0. In effect, when the particle's position is 2 m the timer is started, i.e. t=0. Displacement is then distance between two positions of the coordinate system as a function of elapsed time (3 s), which in this case 6 m.
Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@AaronStevens Oops! I'll correct. What would I do without you (keeping me honest!)
$endgroup$
– Bob D
Jul 28 at 23:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we go from point A to point B we undergo a displacement. This is the distance from A to B, together with its direction, and is the archetypal vector quantity.
We can give the position of a point as a displacement from some agreed datum point or origin, O.
In your question – which in my opinion is not nicely worded – the motion is presumably along a straight line. Saying that the position at time 0 is 2 m implies a displacement of +2 m from some origin. Your x is the position of the particle at time t, that is its displacement from the origin at time t.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Position and displacement are different, but you will find people use them as synonyms. For school purposes, its important to learn exactly how your textbook and teacher handle these terms and to understand that they are different. When you get out into the real world, you will find context makes it much more obvious what people are talking about, and you can ask for clarification if you need.
Positions are points in space. They are always defined within some coordinate system. Equations of motion are typically phrased in terms of position. There is always exactly one origin for a coordinate system like this, so we can unambiguously identify positions.
In your example, you are calculating positions. They give you an initial position of x=2m, and you calculate the final position to be x=8m
Displacement is a difference in position from some reference point. Most commonly this is the point at t=0, though that may not always be the case. In your example, the most reasonable assumption is that "displacement" means "displacement [from its initial position]." Since it starts at x=2m and ends at x=8m, the total displacement is 8m-2m=6m. If you want to make a displacement clear, the Delta ($Delta$) symbol is typically used. I might write $Delta x=6;text m$.
Displacement is commonly used when some measurements are more meaningful or easy to describe than others. Consider the movement of a piston up and down. If I have one big coordinate system for the entire engine, the piston may be at y=208mm at "top dead center" and y=186mm at the bottom of its movement. It's much easier for me to say "At the bottom of the stroke, the piston has been displaced 22mm from its position at top dead center" than it is to measure it from some origin. This is especially true if there's variability. There may be 5mm of variability in how high the piston is installed in the engine, but only 1mm of variability in its stroke length. Talking about displacement makes it easy to discard variability you didn't need.
Now comes the confusion. One can always talk about a position as a displacement from an origin. In fact, in some systems this is a far easier approach because it treats points and vectors as one and the same. Likewise, I can always define a reference frame centered on the initial position of an object, and then its position in that frame is the same as its displacement.
This is why the two terms are easy to confuse. While they are different, we will often smoothly flow from one term to another. In the real world, ask questions. In the world of test taking, learn the language hints your textbooks use and pass your tests.
Which brings us to distances. A distance is a length of a line in space. The distance between point A and point B is the length of a line between them. However, we can also talk about the length of arbitrary curves, not just straight lines. This is what your homework problem is trying to do. I believe it was supposed to read "distance traveled," which is the length of the curve tracing the path the object takes.
In your case, the object travels in one direction from t=0 until t=2, when its velocity is zero, then it travels the other direction from t=2 to t=3. Thus the length of this curve is the length between where it was at t=0 and where it was at t=2, plus length between where it was a t=2 and t=3. At t=2, x=10, so the particle has traveld from x=2 to x=10, a distance of 8. Then it travels from x=10 at t=2 to x=8 at t=3, for an additional distance of 2. The total distance traveled will be 10m.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose you start on the 10th step of a very big stair. You walk 100 steps up the stair, then turn around and walk 95 steps down.
- Your position is where you are, which is now the 15th step.
- Your displacement is the net change of your position, which is $15-10=5$ steps.
- Your distance traveled is how much you actually moved, which is $100+95=195$ steps.
In relation to your example:
- If position $x$ at time $t$ is $x(t)$ you can get position at $t_f=3$ s by finding $x(t_f)=x(3text s)$.
- If you started moving at time $t_i$ and finished at $t_f$ then the displacement is the net change in position $Delta x = x(t_f) - x(t_i)=x(3text s)-x(0text s)$.
- Distance traveled is found by adding up each individual "step". For continuous movements, you must add up infinitely small steps $dx = x(t)dt$, which is given by $int_t_i^t_fx(t)dt$. This is what you found.
I will leave the calculations themselves as an exercise to the reader.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494096%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-position-displacement-and-distance-traveled%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Position is a single point. Usually in space we indicate positions with coordinates like $(x,y,z)$ in Cartesian coordinates, $(r,phi,theta)$ in spherical coordinates, etc. We can also define the position as a vector, i.e. the position vector, that is a vector that points from the origin (subjectively defined) to the position of the particle in question. It could be $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$ using Cartesian coordinates, $mathbf r=rhat r$ using spherical coordinates$^*$, etc. In 1D there really isn't anything different between the position coordinate and the position vector, so you don't need to worry about the distinction in the problem you have described in your question.
Displacement is the change in position. It is a vector quantity; it is the difference between two position vectors. So, for example, if you go around a circle exactly one time, your displacement over that time is $0$. You can get the displacement at some time $t$ by integrating the instantaneous velocity over time:
$$Deltamathbf r=mathbf r(t)-mathbf r(t_0)=int_t_0^tmathbf v(tau)text dtau$$
Notice that $mathbf r(t)$ is the position at time $t$, and $mathbf r(t_0)$ is the initial position you are calculating the displacement with respect to. Hence the integral gives displacement since it is the difference between the final and initial position vectors.
Distance is a little different, but it is easy to understand. You can think of it as what the odometer in your car gives to you. It just tells you how far you have traveled without reference to some starting point. Going back to the example of going around a circle one time, your displacement was $0$, but the distance you traveled is equal to the circumference of the circle. Distance is a scalar value. You can determine it by integrating the speed over time:
$$D(t)=int_0^t|mathbf v(tau)|text dtau$$
Note that this integral is the same thing as the curve length of the path the particle moves along (i.e. the distance you have traveled).
These explanations should help you in your own problem.
$^*$ Note that the position vector in spherical coordinates is not $mathbf r=rhat r+phihatphi+thetahattheta$. This is because the position vector, by definition, points from the origin to the position (coordinate) of the particle. Therefore, the position vector can only have a radial component, i.e. $mathbf r=rhat r$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The base vectors in curvilinear coordinates are defined locally as $hat u = fracpartialmathbf r/partial upartialmathbf r/partial u$, so it's confusing to describe the position using them. One might think that since $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$, then $mathbf r=rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$, but that's wrong. It's simply $mathbf r=rhat r$.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 6:33
$begingroup$
@Wood Yeah that's what I have in my answer? Why are you commenting this?
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 11:02
$begingroup$
Because some people might wonder why it's $rhat r$ instead of $rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$. Maybe it's obvious to you, but it was confusing to me when I learned it and I'm sure it's confusing to other people too.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 21:55
$begingroup$
@Wood I wanted to give examples of ways we express position and position vectors. I don't think your point is essential to the question and answer. Nevertheless I have added a footnote. Thank you for the input and suggestions.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 22:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Position is a single point. Usually in space we indicate positions with coordinates like $(x,y,z)$ in Cartesian coordinates, $(r,phi,theta)$ in spherical coordinates, etc. We can also define the position as a vector, i.e. the position vector, that is a vector that points from the origin (subjectively defined) to the position of the particle in question. It could be $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$ using Cartesian coordinates, $mathbf r=rhat r$ using spherical coordinates$^*$, etc. In 1D there really isn't anything different between the position coordinate and the position vector, so you don't need to worry about the distinction in the problem you have described in your question.
Displacement is the change in position. It is a vector quantity; it is the difference between two position vectors. So, for example, if you go around a circle exactly one time, your displacement over that time is $0$. You can get the displacement at some time $t$ by integrating the instantaneous velocity over time:
$$Deltamathbf r=mathbf r(t)-mathbf r(t_0)=int_t_0^tmathbf v(tau)text dtau$$
Notice that $mathbf r(t)$ is the position at time $t$, and $mathbf r(t_0)$ is the initial position you are calculating the displacement with respect to. Hence the integral gives displacement since it is the difference between the final and initial position vectors.
Distance is a little different, but it is easy to understand. You can think of it as what the odometer in your car gives to you. It just tells you how far you have traveled without reference to some starting point. Going back to the example of going around a circle one time, your displacement was $0$, but the distance you traveled is equal to the circumference of the circle. Distance is a scalar value. You can determine it by integrating the speed over time:
$$D(t)=int_0^t|mathbf v(tau)|text dtau$$
Note that this integral is the same thing as the curve length of the path the particle moves along (i.e. the distance you have traveled).
These explanations should help you in your own problem.
$^*$ Note that the position vector in spherical coordinates is not $mathbf r=rhat r+phihatphi+thetahattheta$. This is because the position vector, by definition, points from the origin to the position (coordinate) of the particle. Therefore, the position vector can only have a radial component, i.e. $mathbf r=rhat r$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The base vectors in curvilinear coordinates are defined locally as $hat u = fracpartialmathbf r/partial upartialmathbf r/partial u$, so it's confusing to describe the position using them. One might think that since $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$, then $mathbf r=rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$, but that's wrong. It's simply $mathbf r=rhat r$.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 6:33
$begingroup$
@Wood Yeah that's what I have in my answer? Why are you commenting this?
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 11:02
$begingroup$
Because some people might wonder why it's $rhat r$ instead of $rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$. Maybe it's obvious to you, but it was confusing to me when I learned it and I'm sure it's confusing to other people too.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 21:55
$begingroup$
@Wood I wanted to give examples of ways we express position and position vectors. I don't think your point is essential to the question and answer. Nevertheless I have added a footnote. Thank you for the input and suggestions.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 22:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Position is a single point. Usually in space we indicate positions with coordinates like $(x,y,z)$ in Cartesian coordinates, $(r,phi,theta)$ in spherical coordinates, etc. We can also define the position as a vector, i.e. the position vector, that is a vector that points from the origin (subjectively defined) to the position of the particle in question. It could be $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$ using Cartesian coordinates, $mathbf r=rhat r$ using spherical coordinates$^*$, etc. In 1D there really isn't anything different between the position coordinate and the position vector, so you don't need to worry about the distinction in the problem you have described in your question.
Displacement is the change in position. It is a vector quantity; it is the difference between two position vectors. So, for example, if you go around a circle exactly one time, your displacement over that time is $0$. You can get the displacement at some time $t$ by integrating the instantaneous velocity over time:
$$Deltamathbf r=mathbf r(t)-mathbf r(t_0)=int_t_0^tmathbf v(tau)text dtau$$
Notice that $mathbf r(t)$ is the position at time $t$, and $mathbf r(t_0)$ is the initial position you are calculating the displacement with respect to. Hence the integral gives displacement since it is the difference between the final and initial position vectors.
Distance is a little different, but it is easy to understand. You can think of it as what the odometer in your car gives to you. It just tells you how far you have traveled without reference to some starting point. Going back to the example of going around a circle one time, your displacement was $0$, but the distance you traveled is equal to the circumference of the circle. Distance is a scalar value. You can determine it by integrating the speed over time:
$$D(t)=int_0^t|mathbf v(tau)|text dtau$$
Note that this integral is the same thing as the curve length of the path the particle moves along (i.e. the distance you have traveled).
These explanations should help you in your own problem.
$^*$ Note that the position vector in spherical coordinates is not $mathbf r=rhat r+phihatphi+thetahattheta$. This is because the position vector, by definition, points from the origin to the position (coordinate) of the particle. Therefore, the position vector can only have a radial component, i.e. $mathbf r=rhat r$
$endgroup$
Position is a single point. Usually in space we indicate positions with coordinates like $(x,y,z)$ in Cartesian coordinates, $(r,phi,theta)$ in spherical coordinates, etc. We can also define the position as a vector, i.e. the position vector, that is a vector that points from the origin (subjectively defined) to the position of the particle in question. It could be $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$ using Cartesian coordinates, $mathbf r=rhat r$ using spherical coordinates$^*$, etc. In 1D there really isn't anything different between the position coordinate and the position vector, so you don't need to worry about the distinction in the problem you have described in your question.
Displacement is the change in position. It is a vector quantity; it is the difference between two position vectors. So, for example, if you go around a circle exactly one time, your displacement over that time is $0$. You can get the displacement at some time $t$ by integrating the instantaneous velocity over time:
$$Deltamathbf r=mathbf r(t)-mathbf r(t_0)=int_t_0^tmathbf v(tau)text dtau$$
Notice that $mathbf r(t)$ is the position at time $t$, and $mathbf r(t_0)$ is the initial position you are calculating the displacement with respect to. Hence the integral gives displacement since it is the difference between the final and initial position vectors.
Distance is a little different, but it is easy to understand. You can think of it as what the odometer in your car gives to you. It just tells you how far you have traveled without reference to some starting point. Going back to the example of going around a circle one time, your displacement was $0$, but the distance you traveled is equal to the circumference of the circle. Distance is a scalar value. You can determine it by integrating the speed over time:
$$D(t)=int_0^t|mathbf v(tau)|text dtau$$
Note that this integral is the same thing as the curve length of the path the particle moves along (i.e. the distance you have traveled).
These explanations should help you in your own problem.
$^*$ Note that the position vector in spherical coordinates is not $mathbf r=rhat r+phihatphi+thetahattheta$. This is because the position vector, by definition, points from the origin to the position (coordinate) of the particle. Therefore, the position vector can only have a radial component, i.e. $mathbf r=rhat r$
edited Jul 29 at 22:13
answered Jul 28 at 21:53
Aaron StevensAaron Stevens
20.4k4 gold badges35 silver badges72 bronze badges
20.4k4 gold badges35 silver badges72 bronze badges
$begingroup$
The base vectors in curvilinear coordinates are defined locally as $hat u = fracpartialmathbf r/partial upartialmathbf r/partial u$, so it's confusing to describe the position using them. One might think that since $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$, then $mathbf r=rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$, but that's wrong. It's simply $mathbf r=rhat r$.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 6:33
$begingroup$
@Wood Yeah that's what I have in my answer? Why are you commenting this?
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 11:02
$begingroup$
Because some people might wonder why it's $rhat r$ instead of $rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$. Maybe it's obvious to you, but it was confusing to me when I learned it and I'm sure it's confusing to other people too.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 21:55
$begingroup$
@Wood I wanted to give examples of ways we express position and position vectors. I don't think your point is essential to the question and answer. Nevertheless I have added a footnote. Thank you for the input and suggestions.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 22:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The base vectors in curvilinear coordinates are defined locally as $hat u = fracpartialmathbf r/partial upartialmathbf r/partial u$, so it's confusing to describe the position using them. One might think that since $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$, then $mathbf r=rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$, but that's wrong. It's simply $mathbf r=rhat r$.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 6:33
$begingroup$
@Wood Yeah that's what I have in my answer? Why are you commenting this?
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 11:02
$begingroup$
Because some people might wonder why it's $rhat r$ instead of $rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$. Maybe it's obvious to you, but it was confusing to me when I learned it and I'm sure it's confusing to other people too.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 21:55
$begingroup$
@Wood I wanted to give examples of ways we express position and position vectors. I don't think your point is essential to the question and answer. Nevertheless I have added a footnote. Thank you for the input and suggestions.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 22:14
$begingroup$
The base vectors in curvilinear coordinates are defined locally as $hat u = fracpartialmathbf r/partial upartialmathbf r/partial u$, so it's confusing to describe the position using them. One might think that since $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$, then $mathbf r=rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$, but that's wrong. It's simply $mathbf r=rhat r$.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 6:33
$begingroup$
The base vectors in curvilinear coordinates are defined locally as $hat u = fracpartialmathbf r/partial upartialmathbf r/partial u$, so it's confusing to describe the position using them. One might think that since $mathbf r=xhat x+yhat y+zhat z$, then $mathbf r=rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$, but that's wrong. It's simply $mathbf r=rhat r$.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 6:33
$begingroup$
@Wood Yeah that's what I have in my answer? Why are you commenting this?
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 11:02
$begingroup$
@Wood Yeah that's what I have in my answer? Why are you commenting this?
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 11:02
$begingroup$
Because some people might wonder why it's $rhat r$ instead of $rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$. Maybe it's obvious to you, but it was confusing to me when I learned it and I'm sure it's confusing to other people too.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 21:55
$begingroup$
Because some people might wonder why it's $rhat r$ instead of $rhat r+thetahat theta+phihat phi$. Maybe it's obvious to you, but it was confusing to me when I learned it and I'm sure it's confusing to other people too.
$endgroup$
– Wood
Jul 29 at 21:55
$begingroup$
@Wood I wanted to give examples of ways we express position and position vectors. I don't think your point is essential to the question and answer. Nevertheless I have added a footnote. Thank you for the input and suggestions.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 22:14
$begingroup$
@Wood I wanted to give examples of ways we express position and position vectors. I don't think your point is essential to the question and answer. Nevertheless I have added a footnote. Thank you for the input and suggestions.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Jul 29 at 22:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$colorbluetextPosition$:
$$colorbluevec p(t)$$$colorredtextDisplacement$†:
$$colorredvec p(t_2) - vec p(t_1)$$$colorgreentextDistance Traveled$:
$$colorgreendt$$
†Displacement is sometimes defined as the scalar $|vec p(t_2) - vec p(t_1)|$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$colorbluetextPosition$:
$$colorbluevec p(t)$$$colorredtextDisplacement$†:
$$colorredvec p(t_2) - vec p(t_1)$$$colorgreentextDistance Traveled$:
$$colorgreendt$$
†Displacement is sometimes defined as the scalar $|vec p(t_2) - vec p(t_1)|$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$colorbluetextPosition$:
$$colorbluevec p(t)$$$colorredtextDisplacement$†:
$$colorredvec p(t_2) - vec p(t_1)$$$colorgreentextDistance Traveled$:
$$colorgreendt$$
†Displacement is sometimes defined as the scalar $|vec p(t_2) - vec p(t_1)|$.
$endgroup$
$colorbluetextPosition$:
$$colorbluevec p(t)$$$colorredtextDisplacement$†:
$$colorredvec p(t_2) - vec p(t_1)$$$colorgreentextDistance Traveled$:
$$colorgreendt$$
†Displacement is sometimes defined as the scalar $|vec p(t_2) - vec p(t_1)|$.
answered Jul 29 at 8:04
WoodWood
1,1102 gold badges11 silver badges22 bronze badges
1,1102 gold badges11 silver badges22 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is the difference between position, displacement, and distance
traveled?
Succinctly:
(1) the position of an object is a vector with tail at the origin of the coordinate system and head at the location of the object.
(2) the displacement of an object is the vector difference of the current position vector of the object and the position vector of the object at an earlier time. That is, the tail of this displacement vector is at the earlier position and the head is at the current position. The length of this vector is, generally, the shortest distance between the earlier and current positions.
(3) the distance traveled from the earlier position to the current position is not a vector but is, rather, a path length. There are an infinity of paths that an object may take from the earlier position to the current position and, in general, each has a different associated length.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is the difference between position, displacement, and distance
traveled?
Succinctly:
(1) the position of an object is a vector with tail at the origin of the coordinate system and head at the location of the object.
(2) the displacement of an object is the vector difference of the current position vector of the object and the position vector of the object at an earlier time. That is, the tail of this displacement vector is at the earlier position and the head is at the current position. The length of this vector is, generally, the shortest distance between the earlier and current positions.
(3) the distance traveled from the earlier position to the current position is not a vector but is, rather, a path length. There are an infinity of paths that an object may take from the earlier position to the current position and, in general, each has a different associated length.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is the difference between position, displacement, and distance
traveled?
Succinctly:
(1) the position of an object is a vector with tail at the origin of the coordinate system and head at the location of the object.
(2) the displacement of an object is the vector difference of the current position vector of the object and the position vector of the object at an earlier time. That is, the tail of this displacement vector is at the earlier position and the head is at the current position. The length of this vector is, generally, the shortest distance between the earlier and current positions.
(3) the distance traveled from the earlier position to the current position is not a vector but is, rather, a path length. There are an infinity of paths that an object may take from the earlier position to the current position and, in general, each has a different associated length.
$endgroup$
What is the difference between position, displacement, and distance
traveled?
Succinctly:
(1) the position of an object is a vector with tail at the origin of the coordinate system and head at the location of the object.
(2) the displacement of an object is the vector difference of the current position vector of the object and the position vector of the object at an earlier time. That is, the tail of this displacement vector is at the earlier position and the head is at the current position. The length of this vector is, generally, the shortest distance between the earlier and current positions.
(3) the distance traveled from the earlier position to the current position is not a vector but is, rather, a path length. There are an infinity of paths that an object may take from the earlier position to the current position and, in general, each has a different associated length.
answered Jul 29 at 1:17
Alfred CentauriAlfred Centauri
50.2k3 gold badges53 silver badges163 bronze badges
50.2k3 gold badges53 silver badges163 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So the 8m is displacement or distance?
The 8m is the position of the particle. The displacement is 6 m.
When you integrated the velocity function to get position you included a constant of integration (2 m) to account for the initial position of the particle, that is, its position at time t=0, which is given as 2 meters. If you omitted the constant of integration then you would be calculating the change in position, i.e. the displacement, and not the position. In this case the displacement would be 6 m.
Position can be considered as a point in a coordinate system relative to the origin of the coordinate system. The diagram below shows the position $s$ of the particle in a one dimensional coordinate system, relative to the origin of the system, s=0. In effect, when the particle's position is 2 m the timer is started, i.e. t=0. Displacement is then distance between two positions of the coordinate system as a function of elapsed time (3 s), which in this case 6 m.
Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@AaronStevens Oops! I'll correct. What would I do without you (keeping me honest!)
$endgroup$
– Bob D
Jul 28 at 23:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So the 8m is displacement or distance?
The 8m is the position of the particle. The displacement is 6 m.
When you integrated the velocity function to get position you included a constant of integration (2 m) to account for the initial position of the particle, that is, its position at time t=0, which is given as 2 meters. If you omitted the constant of integration then you would be calculating the change in position, i.e. the displacement, and not the position. In this case the displacement would be 6 m.
Position can be considered as a point in a coordinate system relative to the origin of the coordinate system. The diagram below shows the position $s$ of the particle in a one dimensional coordinate system, relative to the origin of the system, s=0. In effect, when the particle's position is 2 m the timer is started, i.e. t=0. Displacement is then distance between two positions of the coordinate system as a function of elapsed time (3 s), which in this case 6 m.
Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@AaronStevens Oops! I'll correct. What would I do without you (keeping me honest!)
$endgroup$
– Bob D
Jul 28 at 23:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So the 8m is displacement or distance?
The 8m is the position of the particle. The displacement is 6 m.
When you integrated the velocity function to get position you included a constant of integration (2 m) to account for the initial position of the particle, that is, its position at time t=0, which is given as 2 meters. If you omitted the constant of integration then you would be calculating the change in position, i.e. the displacement, and not the position. In this case the displacement would be 6 m.
Position can be considered as a point in a coordinate system relative to the origin of the coordinate system. The diagram below shows the position $s$ of the particle in a one dimensional coordinate system, relative to the origin of the system, s=0. In effect, when the particle's position is 2 m the timer is started, i.e. t=0. Displacement is then distance between two positions of the coordinate system as a function of elapsed time (3 s), which in this case 6 m.
Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
So the 8m is displacement or distance?
The 8m is the position of the particle. The displacement is 6 m.
When you integrated the velocity function to get position you included a constant of integration (2 m) to account for the initial position of the particle, that is, its position at time t=0, which is given as 2 meters. If you omitted the constant of integration then you would be calculating the change in position, i.e. the displacement, and not the position. In this case the displacement would be 6 m.
Position can be considered as a point in a coordinate system relative to the origin of the coordinate system. The diagram below shows the position $s$ of the particle in a one dimensional coordinate system, relative to the origin of the system, s=0. In effect, when the particle's position is 2 m the timer is started, i.e. t=0. Displacement is then distance between two positions of the coordinate system as a function of elapsed time (3 s), which in this case 6 m.
Hope this helps.
edited Jul 28 at 23:51
answered Jul 28 at 22:46
Bob DBob D
11.4k3 gold badges10 silver badges36 bronze badges
11.4k3 gold badges10 silver badges36 bronze badges
$begingroup$
@AaronStevens Oops! I'll correct. What would I do without you (keeping me honest!)
$endgroup$
– Bob D
Jul 28 at 23:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@AaronStevens Oops! I'll correct. What would I do without you (keeping me honest!)
$endgroup$
– Bob D
Jul 28 at 23:32
$begingroup$
@AaronStevens Oops! I'll correct. What would I do without you (keeping me honest!)
$endgroup$
– Bob D
Jul 28 at 23:32
$begingroup$
@AaronStevens Oops! I'll correct. What would I do without you (keeping me honest!)
$endgroup$
– Bob D
Jul 28 at 23:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we go from point A to point B we undergo a displacement. This is the distance from A to B, together with its direction, and is the archetypal vector quantity.
We can give the position of a point as a displacement from some agreed datum point or origin, O.
In your question – which in my opinion is not nicely worded – the motion is presumably along a straight line. Saying that the position at time 0 is 2 m implies a displacement of +2 m from some origin. Your x is the position of the particle at time t, that is its displacement from the origin at time t.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we go from point A to point B we undergo a displacement. This is the distance from A to B, together with its direction, and is the archetypal vector quantity.
We can give the position of a point as a displacement from some agreed datum point or origin, O.
In your question – which in my opinion is not nicely worded – the motion is presumably along a straight line. Saying that the position at time 0 is 2 m implies a displacement of +2 m from some origin. Your x is the position of the particle at time t, that is its displacement from the origin at time t.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we go from point A to point B we undergo a displacement. This is the distance from A to B, together with its direction, and is the archetypal vector quantity.
We can give the position of a point as a displacement from some agreed datum point or origin, O.
In your question – which in my opinion is not nicely worded – the motion is presumably along a straight line. Saying that the position at time 0 is 2 m implies a displacement of +2 m from some origin. Your x is the position of the particle at time t, that is its displacement from the origin at time t.
$endgroup$
If we go from point A to point B we undergo a displacement. This is the distance from A to B, together with its direction, and is the archetypal vector quantity.
We can give the position of a point as a displacement from some agreed datum point or origin, O.
In your question – which in my opinion is not nicely worded – the motion is presumably along a straight line. Saying that the position at time 0 is 2 m implies a displacement of +2 m from some origin. Your x is the position of the particle at time t, that is its displacement from the origin at time t.
answered Jul 28 at 21:46
Philip WoodPhilip Wood
10.5k3 gold badges9 silver badges20 bronze badges
10.5k3 gold badges9 silver badges20 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Position and displacement are different, but you will find people use them as synonyms. For school purposes, its important to learn exactly how your textbook and teacher handle these terms and to understand that they are different. When you get out into the real world, you will find context makes it much more obvious what people are talking about, and you can ask for clarification if you need.
Positions are points in space. They are always defined within some coordinate system. Equations of motion are typically phrased in terms of position. There is always exactly one origin for a coordinate system like this, so we can unambiguously identify positions.
In your example, you are calculating positions. They give you an initial position of x=2m, and you calculate the final position to be x=8m
Displacement is a difference in position from some reference point. Most commonly this is the point at t=0, though that may not always be the case. In your example, the most reasonable assumption is that "displacement" means "displacement [from its initial position]." Since it starts at x=2m and ends at x=8m, the total displacement is 8m-2m=6m. If you want to make a displacement clear, the Delta ($Delta$) symbol is typically used. I might write $Delta x=6;text m$.
Displacement is commonly used when some measurements are more meaningful or easy to describe than others. Consider the movement of a piston up and down. If I have one big coordinate system for the entire engine, the piston may be at y=208mm at "top dead center" and y=186mm at the bottom of its movement. It's much easier for me to say "At the bottom of the stroke, the piston has been displaced 22mm from its position at top dead center" than it is to measure it from some origin. This is especially true if there's variability. There may be 5mm of variability in how high the piston is installed in the engine, but only 1mm of variability in its stroke length. Talking about displacement makes it easy to discard variability you didn't need.
Now comes the confusion. One can always talk about a position as a displacement from an origin. In fact, in some systems this is a far easier approach because it treats points and vectors as one and the same. Likewise, I can always define a reference frame centered on the initial position of an object, and then its position in that frame is the same as its displacement.
This is why the two terms are easy to confuse. While they are different, we will often smoothly flow from one term to another. In the real world, ask questions. In the world of test taking, learn the language hints your textbooks use and pass your tests.
Which brings us to distances. A distance is a length of a line in space. The distance between point A and point B is the length of a line between them. However, we can also talk about the length of arbitrary curves, not just straight lines. This is what your homework problem is trying to do. I believe it was supposed to read "distance traveled," which is the length of the curve tracing the path the object takes.
In your case, the object travels in one direction from t=0 until t=2, when its velocity is zero, then it travels the other direction from t=2 to t=3. Thus the length of this curve is the length between where it was at t=0 and where it was at t=2, plus length between where it was a t=2 and t=3. At t=2, x=10, so the particle has traveld from x=2 to x=10, a distance of 8. Then it travels from x=10 at t=2 to x=8 at t=3, for an additional distance of 2. The total distance traveled will be 10m.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Position and displacement are different, but you will find people use them as synonyms. For school purposes, its important to learn exactly how your textbook and teacher handle these terms and to understand that they are different. When you get out into the real world, you will find context makes it much more obvious what people are talking about, and you can ask for clarification if you need.
Positions are points in space. They are always defined within some coordinate system. Equations of motion are typically phrased in terms of position. There is always exactly one origin for a coordinate system like this, so we can unambiguously identify positions.
In your example, you are calculating positions. They give you an initial position of x=2m, and you calculate the final position to be x=8m
Displacement is a difference in position from some reference point. Most commonly this is the point at t=0, though that may not always be the case. In your example, the most reasonable assumption is that "displacement" means "displacement [from its initial position]." Since it starts at x=2m and ends at x=8m, the total displacement is 8m-2m=6m. If you want to make a displacement clear, the Delta ($Delta$) symbol is typically used. I might write $Delta x=6;text m$.
Displacement is commonly used when some measurements are more meaningful or easy to describe than others. Consider the movement of a piston up and down. If I have one big coordinate system for the entire engine, the piston may be at y=208mm at "top dead center" and y=186mm at the bottom of its movement. It's much easier for me to say "At the bottom of the stroke, the piston has been displaced 22mm from its position at top dead center" than it is to measure it from some origin. This is especially true if there's variability. There may be 5mm of variability in how high the piston is installed in the engine, but only 1mm of variability in its stroke length. Talking about displacement makes it easy to discard variability you didn't need.
Now comes the confusion. One can always talk about a position as a displacement from an origin. In fact, in some systems this is a far easier approach because it treats points and vectors as one and the same. Likewise, I can always define a reference frame centered on the initial position of an object, and then its position in that frame is the same as its displacement.
This is why the two terms are easy to confuse. While they are different, we will often smoothly flow from one term to another. In the real world, ask questions. In the world of test taking, learn the language hints your textbooks use and pass your tests.
Which brings us to distances. A distance is a length of a line in space. The distance between point A and point B is the length of a line between them. However, we can also talk about the length of arbitrary curves, not just straight lines. This is what your homework problem is trying to do. I believe it was supposed to read "distance traveled," which is the length of the curve tracing the path the object takes.
In your case, the object travels in one direction from t=0 until t=2, when its velocity is zero, then it travels the other direction from t=2 to t=3. Thus the length of this curve is the length between where it was at t=0 and where it was at t=2, plus length between where it was a t=2 and t=3. At t=2, x=10, so the particle has traveld from x=2 to x=10, a distance of 8. Then it travels from x=10 at t=2 to x=8 at t=3, for an additional distance of 2. The total distance traveled will be 10m.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Position and displacement are different, but you will find people use them as synonyms. For school purposes, its important to learn exactly how your textbook and teacher handle these terms and to understand that they are different. When you get out into the real world, you will find context makes it much more obvious what people are talking about, and you can ask for clarification if you need.
Positions are points in space. They are always defined within some coordinate system. Equations of motion are typically phrased in terms of position. There is always exactly one origin for a coordinate system like this, so we can unambiguously identify positions.
In your example, you are calculating positions. They give you an initial position of x=2m, and you calculate the final position to be x=8m
Displacement is a difference in position from some reference point. Most commonly this is the point at t=0, though that may not always be the case. In your example, the most reasonable assumption is that "displacement" means "displacement [from its initial position]." Since it starts at x=2m and ends at x=8m, the total displacement is 8m-2m=6m. If you want to make a displacement clear, the Delta ($Delta$) symbol is typically used. I might write $Delta x=6;text m$.
Displacement is commonly used when some measurements are more meaningful or easy to describe than others. Consider the movement of a piston up and down. If I have one big coordinate system for the entire engine, the piston may be at y=208mm at "top dead center" and y=186mm at the bottom of its movement. It's much easier for me to say "At the bottom of the stroke, the piston has been displaced 22mm from its position at top dead center" than it is to measure it from some origin. This is especially true if there's variability. There may be 5mm of variability in how high the piston is installed in the engine, but only 1mm of variability in its stroke length. Talking about displacement makes it easy to discard variability you didn't need.
Now comes the confusion. One can always talk about a position as a displacement from an origin. In fact, in some systems this is a far easier approach because it treats points and vectors as one and the same. Likewise, I can always define a reference frame centered on the initial position of an object, and then its position in that frame is the same as its displacement.
This is why the two terms are easy to confuse. While they are different, we will often smoothly flow from one term to another. In the real world, ask questions. In the world of test taking, learn the language hints your textbooks use and pass your tests.
Which brings us to distances. A distance is a length of a line in space. The distance between point A and point B is the length of a line between them. However, we can also talk about the length of arbitrary curves, not just straight lines. This is what your homework problem is trying to do. I believe it was supposed to read "distance traveled," which is the length of the curve tracing the path the object takes.
In your case, the object travels in one direction from t=0 until t=2, when its velocity is zero, then it travels the other direction from t=2 to t=3. Thus the length of this curve is the length between where it was at t=0 and where it was at t=2, plus length between where it was a t=2 and t=3. At t=2, x=10, so the particle has traveld from x=2 to x=10, a distance of 8. Then it travels from x=10 at t=2 to x=8 at t=3, for an additional distance of 2. The total distance traveled will be 10m.
$endgroup$
Position and displacement are different, but you will find people use them as synonyms. For school purposes, its important to learn exactly how your textbook and teacher handle these terms and to understand that they are different. When you get out into the real world, you will find context makes it much more obvious what people are talking about, and you can ask for clarification if you need.
Positions are points in space. They are always defined within some coordinate system. Equations of motion are typically phrased in terms of position. There is always exactly one origin for a coordinate system like this, so we can unambiguously identify positions.
In your example, you are calculating positions. They give you an initial position of x=2m, and you calculate the final position to be x=8m
Displacement is a difference in position from some reference point. Most commonly this is the point at t=0, though that may not always be the case. In your example, the most reasonable assumption is that "displacement" means "displacement [from its initial position]." Since it starts at x=2m and ends at x=8m, the total displacement is 8m-2m=6m. If you want to make a displacement clear, the Delta ($Delta$) symbol is typically used. I might write $Delta x=6;text m$.
Displacement is commonly used when some measurements are more meaningful or easy to describe than others. Consider the movement of a piston up and down. If I have one big coordinate system for the entire engine, the piston may be at y=208mm at "top dead center" and y=186mm at the bottom of its movement. It's much easier for me to say "At the bottom of the stroke, the piston has been displaced 22mm from its position at top dead center" than it is to measure it from some origin. This is especially true if there's variability. There may be 5mm of variability in how high the piston is installed in the engine, but only 1mm of variability in its stroke length. Talking about displacement makes it easy to discard variability you didn't need.
Now comes the confusion. One can always talk about a position as a displacement from an origin. In fact, in some systems this is a far easier approach because it treats points and vectors as one and the same. Likewise, I can always define a reference frame centered on the initial position of an object, and then its position in that frame is the same as its displacement.
This is why the two terms are easy to confuse. While they are different, we will often smoothly flow from one term to another. In the real world, ask questions. In the world of test taking, learn the language hints your textbooks use and pass your tests.
Which brings us to distances. A distance is a length of a line in space. The distance between point A and point B is the length of a line between them. However, we can also talk about the length of arbitrary curves, not just straight lines. This is what your homework problem is trying to do. I believe it was supposed to read "distance traveled," which is the length of the curve tracing the path the object takes.
In your case, the object travels in one direction from t=0 until t=2, when its velocity is zero, then it travels the other direction from t=2 to t=3. Thus the length of this curve is the length between where it was at t=0 and where it was at t=2, plus length between where it was a t=2 and t=3. At t=2, x=10, so the particle has traveld from x=2 to x=10, a distance of 8. Then it travels from x=10 at t=2 to x=8 at t=3, for an additional distance of 2. The total distance traveled will be 10m.
answered Jul 28 at 22:19
Cort AmmonCort Ammon
27k4 gold badges58 silver badges91 bronze badges
27k4 gold badges58 silver badges91 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose you start on the 10th step of a very big stair. You walk 100 steps up the stair, then turn around and walk 95 steps down.
- Your position is where you are, which is now the 15th step.
- Your displacement is the net change of your position, which is $15-10=5$ steps.
- Your distance traveled is how much you actually moved, which is $100+95=195$ steps.
In relation to your example:
- If position $x$ at time $t$ is $x(t)$ you can get position at $t_f=3$ s by finding $x(t_f)=x(3text s)$.
- If you started moving at time $t_i$ and finished at $t_f$ then the displacement is the net change in position $Delta x = x(t_f) - x(t_i)=x(3text s)-x(0text s)$.
- Distance traveled is found by adding up each individual "step". For continuous movements, you must add up infinitely small steps $dx = x(t)dt$, which is given by $int_t_i^t_fx(t)dt$. This is what you found.
I will leave the calculations themselves as an exercise to the reader.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose you start on the 10th step of a very big stair. You walk 100 steps up the stair, then turn around and walk 95 steps down.
- Your position is where you are, which is now the 15th step.
- Your displacement is the net change of your position, which is $15-10=5$ steps.
- Your distance traveled is how much you actually moved, which is $100+95=195$ steps.
In relation to your example:
- If position $x$ at time $t$ is $x(t)$ you can get position at $t_f=3$ s by finding $x(t_f)=x(3text s)$.
- If you started moving at time $t_i$ and finished at $t_f$ then the displacement is the net change in position $Delta x = x(t_f) - x(t_i)=x(3text s)-x(0text s)$.
- Distance traveled is found by adding up each individual "step". For continuous movements, you must add up infinitely small steps $dx = x(t)dt$, which is given by $int_t_i^t_fx(t)dt$. This is what you found.
I will leave the calculations themselves as an exercise to the reader.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose you start on the 10th step of a very big stair. You walk 100 steps up the stair, then turn around and walk 95 steps down.
- Your position is where you are, which is now the 15th step.
- Your displacement is the net change of your position, which is $15-10=5$ steps.
- Your distance traveled is how much you actually moved, which is $100+95=195$ steps.
In relation to your example:
- If position $x$ at time $t$ is $x(t)$ you can get position at $t_f=3$ s by finding $x(t_f)=x(3text s)$.
- If you started moving at time $t_i$ and finished at $t_f$ then the displacement is the net change in position $Delta x = x(t_f) - x(t_i)=x(3text s)-x(0text s)$.
- Distance traveled is found by adding up each individual "step". For continuous movements, you must add up infinitely small steps $dx = x(t)dt$, which is given by $int_t_i^t_fx(t)dt$. This is what you found.
I will leave the calculations themselves as an exercise to the reader.
$endgroup$
Suppose you start on the 10th step of a very big stair. You walk 100 steps up the stair, then turn around and walk 95 steps down.
- Your position is where you are, which is now the 15th step.
- Your displacement is the net change of your position, which is $15-10=5$ steps.
- Your distance traveled is how much you actually moved, which is $100+95=195$ steps.
In relation to your example:
- If position $x$ at time $t$ is $x(t)$ you can get position at $t_f=3$ s by finding $x(t_f)=x(3text s)$.
- If you started moving at time $t_i$ and finished at $t_f$ then the displacement is the net change in position $Delta x = x(t_f) - x(t_i)=x(3text s)-x(0text s)$.
- Distance traveled is found by adding up each individual "step". For continuous movements, you must add up infinitely small steps $dx = x(t)dt$, which is given by $int_t_i^t_fx(t)dt$. This is what you found.
I will leave the calculations themselves as an exercise to the reader.
answered Jul 29 at 6:37
CathyCathy
472 bronze badges
472 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494096%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-position-displacement-and-distance-traveled%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown