How can I set the aperture on my DSLR when it's attached to a telescope instead of a lens? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteCan I shoot a photo with my DSLR without the lens on?Why does my DSLR's viewfinder ignore the aperture ring on a legacy lens?DSLRs with separate controls for aperture and shutter?How to calculate the size of the image circle at infinity focus?Canon: Setting exposure compensation in M mode?Can a Samsung NX300 shoot without a lens, for attaching to a telescope?Where can I find the maximum camera weight for my lens?How do I force my Canon dSLR (800D) to take a photo?How can I achieve more clarity in my photos of the moon?How can I get consistent exposure while allowing aperture changes on Fujifilm X-T2?
Do chord progressions usually move by fifths?
Protagonist's race is hidden - should I reveal it?
Unix AIX passing variable and arguments to expect and spawn
How is an IPA symbol that lacks a name (e.g. ɲ) called?
How do I overlay a PNG over two videos (one video overlays another) in one command using FFmpeg?
Does using the Inspiration rules for character defects encourage My Guy Syndrome?
Reflections in a Square
Why is ArcGIS Pro not symbolizing my entire range of values?
Is Bran literally the world's memory?
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
Why these surprising proportionalities of integrals involving odd zeta values?
Can a Knight grant Knighthood to another?
Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?
Is my guitar’s action too high?
Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?
Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes?
Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5?
Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell
xkeyval -- read keys from file
How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?
lm and glm function in R
What documents does someone with a long-term visa need to travel to another Schengen country?
Can I take recommendation from someone I met at a conference?
How to get a single big right brace?
How can I set the aperture on my DSLR when it's attached to a telescope instead of a lens?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteCan I shoot a photo with my DSLR without the lens on?Why does my DSLR's viewfinder ignore the aperture ring on a legacy lens?DSLRs with separate controls for aperture and shutter?How to calculate the size of the image circle at infinity focus?Canon: Setting exposure compensation in M mode?Can a Samsung NX300 shoot without a lens, for attaching to a telescope?Where can I find the maximum camera weight for my lens?How do I force my Canon dSLR (800D) to take a photo?How can I achieve more clarity in my photos of the moon?How can I get consistent exposure while allowing aperture changes on Fujifilm X-T2?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
edited Apr 19 at 22:57
Michael C
135k7154384
asked Apr 19 at 18:55
Gergely KovacsGergely Kovacs
1183
New contributor
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
edited Apr 19 at 22:57
Michael C
135k7154384
asked Apr 19 at 18:55
Gergely KovacsGergely Kovacs
1183
New contributor
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I had misunderstood how aperture works big time. Thank you guys for clearing that up. It makes sense now.
– Gergely Kovacs
yesterday
add a comment |
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
edited Apr 19 at 22:57
Michael C
135k7154384
asked Apr 19 at 18:55
Gergely KovacsGergely Kovacs
1183
New contributor
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
edited Apr 19 at 22:57
Michael C
135k7154384
asked Apr 19 at 18:55
Gergely KovacsGergely Kovacs
1183
New contributor
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Apr 19 at 22:57
Michael C
135k7154384
asked Apr 19 at 18:55
Gergely KovacsGergely Kovacs
1183
New contributor
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Apr 19 at 22:57
Michael C
135k7154384
edited Apr 19 at 22:57
Michael C
135k7154384
edited Apr 19 at 22:57
Michael C
135k7154384
135k7154384
asked Apr 19 at 18:55
Gergely KovacsGergely Kovacs
1183
New contributor
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Apr 19 at 18:55
Gergely KovacsGergely Kovacs
1183
asked Apr 19 at 18:55
Gergely KovacsGergely Kovacs
1183
1183
New contributor
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I had misunderstood how aperture works big time. Thank you guys for clearing that up. It makes sense now.
– Gergely Kovacs
yesterday
add a comment |
I had misunderstood how aperture works big time. Thank you guys for clearing that up. It makes sense now.
– Gergely Kovacs
yesterday
I had misunderstood how aperture works big time. Thank you guys for clearing that up. It makes sense now.
– Gergely Kovacs
yesterday
I had misunderstood how aperture works big time. Thank you guys for clearing that up. It makes sense now.
– Gergely Kovacs
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
answered Apr 19 at 19:07
scottbbscottbb
21k75896
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
Apr 19 at 22:12
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
Apr 19 at 22:31
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
2 days ago
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
2 days ago
WHAT aperture? A lens has focal length and aperture. The telescope is now the lens. As I understand telescopes, you pay money to get as LARGE an aperture as possible! Why is it important to adjust it?
– Laurence Payne
2 days ago
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
answered Apr 19 at 20:59
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
26.1k33060
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106699%2fhow-can-i-set-the-aperture-on-my-dslr-when-its-attached-to-a-telescope-instead%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
answered Apr 19 at 19:07
scottbbscottbb
21k75896
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
Apr 19 at 22:12
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
Apr 19 at 22:31
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
2 days ago
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
2 days ago
WHAT aperture? A lens has focal length and aperture. The telescope is now the lens. As I understand telescopes, you pay money to get as LARGE an aperture as possible! Why is it important to adjust it?
– Laurence Payne
2 days ago
add a comment |
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
answered Apr 19 at 19:07
scottbbscottbb
21k75896
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
Apr 19 at 22:12
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
Apr 19 at 22:31
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
2 days ago
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
2 days ago
WHAT aperture? A lens has focal length and aperture. The telescope is now the lens. As I understand telescopes, you pay money to get as LARGE an aperture as possible! Why is it important to adjust it?
– Laurence Payne
2 days ago
add a comment |
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
answered Apr 19 at 19:07
scottbbscottbb
21k75896
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
answered Apr 19 at 19:07
scottbbscottbb
21k75896
edited Apr 19 at 19:20
answered Apr 19 at 19:07
scottbbscottbb
21k75896
answered Apr 19 at 19:07
scottbbscottbb
21k75896
answered Apr 19 at 19:07
scottbbscottbb
21k75896
21k75896
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
Apr 19 at 22:12
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
Apr 19 at 22:31
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
2 days ago
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
2 days ago
WHAT aperture? A lens has focal length and aperture. The telescope is now the lens. As I understand telescopes, you pay money to get as LARGE an aperture as possible! Why is it important to adjust it?
– Laurence Payne
2 days ago
add a comment |
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
Apr 19 at 22:12
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
Apr 19 at 22:31
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
2 days ago
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
2 days ago
WHAT aperture? A lens has focal length and aperture. The telescope is now the lens. As I understand telescopes, you pay money to get as LARGE an aperture as possible! Why is it important to adjust it?
– Laurence Payne
2 days ago
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
Apr 19 at 22:12
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
Apr 19 at 22:12
1
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
Apr 19 at 22:31
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
Apr 19 at 22:31
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
2 days ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
2 days ago
1
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
2 days ago
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
2 days ago
WHAT aperture? A lens has focal length and aperture. The telescope is now the lens. As I understand telescopes, you pay money to get as LARGE an aperture as possible! Why is it important to adjust it?
– Laurence Payne
2 days ago
WHAT aperture? A lens has focal length and aperture. The telescope is now the lens. As I understand telescopes, you pay money to get as LARGE an aperture as possible! Why is it important to adjust it?
– Laurence Payne
2 days ago
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
answered Apr 19 at 20:59
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
26.1k33060
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
answered Apr 19 at 20:59
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
26.1k33060
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
answered Apr 19 at 20:59
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
26.1k33060
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
answered Apr 19 at 20:59
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
26.1k33060
answered Apr 19 at 20:59
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
26.1k33060
answered Apr 19 at 20:59
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
26.1k33060
answered Apr 19 at 20:59
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
26.1k33060
26.1k33060
add a comment |
add a comment |
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106699%2fhow-can-i-set-the-aperture-on-my-dslr-when-its-attached-to-a-telescope-instead%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I had misunderstood how aperture works big time. Thank you guys for clearing that up. It makes sense now.
– Gergely Kovacs
yesterday