Is std::next for vector O(n) or O(1)? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InConcatenating two std::vectorsstd::wstring VS std::stringHow to find out if an item is present in a std::vector?Why is “using namespace std” considered bad practice?How do I use arrays in C++?Image Processing: Algorithm Improvement for 'Coca-Cola Can' RecognitionReplacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviationsHow does std::list.size() have constant complexity?Why does std::vector reserve not “double” its capacity, while resize does?How std::advance iterator type is deduced?
Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?
Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?
How technical should a Scrum Master be to effectively remove impediments?
Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?
Resizing object distorts it (Illustrator CC 2018)
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?
What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?
Worn-tile Scrabble
Delete all lines which don't have n characters before delimiter
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Right tool to dig six foot holes?
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Is there any way to tell whether the shot is going to hit you or not?
Multiply Two Integer Polynomials
Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT
How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf)
Write faster on AT24C32
Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?
Who coined the term "madman theory"?
Is std::next for vector O(n) or O(1)?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InConcatenating two std::vectorsstd::wstring VS std::stringHow to find out if an item is present in a std::vector?Why is “using namespace std” considered bad practice?How do I use arrays in C++?Image Processing: Algorithm Improvement for 'Coca-Cola Can' RecognitionReplacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviationsHow does std::list.size() have constant complexity?Why does std::vector reserve not “double” its capacity, while resize does?How std::advance iterator type is deduced?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
In C++11 I use std::next because If I want to change vector to list, I dont have to change the rest of code.
For list, std::next is O(n), because I need to iterate all elements. But how is it for a vector? I have found this note on cppreference:
However, if
InputItorForwardItadditionally meets the requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator, complexity is constant.
Does vector meet these requirements? And why "Legacy"?
c++
edited yesterday
Angew
135k11261354
asked yesterday
Martin PerryMartin Perry
5,21833267
add a comment |
In C++11 I use std::next because If I want to change vector to list, I dont have to change the rest of code.
For list, std::next is O(n), because I need to iterate all elements. But how is it for a vector? I have found this note on cppreference:
However, if
InputItorForwardItadditionally meets the requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator, complexity is constant.
Does vector meet these requirements? And why "Legacy"?
c++
edited yesterday
Angew
135k11261354
asked yesterday
Martin PerryMartin Perry
5,21833267
12
"Constant" meansO(1).
– Some programmer dude
yesterday
1
I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?
– Martin Perry
yesterday
4
@MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in thestd::vectorreference).
– Some programmer dude
yesterday
add a comment |
In C++11 I use std::next because If I want to change vector to list, I dont have to change the rest of code.
For list, std::next is O(n), because I need to iterate all elements. But how is it for a vector? I have found this note on cppreference:
However, if
InputItorForwardItadditionally meets the requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator, complexity is constant.
Does vector meet these requirements? And why "Legacy"?
c++
edited yesterday
Angew
135k11261354
asked yesterday
Martin PerryMartin Perry
5,21833267
In C++11 I use std::next because If I want to change vector to list, I dont have to change the rest of code.
For list, std::next is O(n), because I need to iterate all elements. But how is it for a vector? I have found this note on cppreference:
However, if
InputItorForwardItadditionally meets the requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator, complexity is constant.
Does vector meet these requirements? And why "Legacy"?
c++
c++
edited yesterday
Angew
135k11261354
asked yesterday
Martin PerryMartin Perry
5,21833267
edited yesterday
Angew
135k11261354
asked yesterday
Martin PerryMartin Perry
5,21833267
edited yesterday
Angew
135k11261354
edited yesterday
Angew
135k11261354
edited yesterday
Angew
135k11261354
135k11261354
asked yesterday
Martin PerryMartin Perry
5,21833267
asked yesterday
Martin PerryMartin Perry
5,21833267
asked yesterday
Martin PerryMartin Perry
5,21833267
5,21833267
12
"Constant" meansO(1).
– Some programmer dude
yesterday
1
I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?
– Martin Perry
yesterday
4
@MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in thestd::vectorreference).
– Some programmer dude
yesterday
add a comment |
12
"Constant" meansO(1).
– Some programmer dude
yesterday
1
I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?
– Martin Perry
yesterday
4
@MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in thestd::vectorreference).
– Some programmer dude
yesterday
12
12
"Constant" means
O(1).– Some programmer dude
yesterday
"Constant" means
O(1).– Some programmer dude
yesterday
1
1
I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?
– Martin Perry
yesterday
I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?
– Martin Perry
yesterday
4
4
@MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in the
std::vector reference).– Some programmer dude
yesterday
@MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in the
std::vector reference).– Some programmer dude
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There is a plan of adding concepts (compile time type constraints) in C++20. The new standard is supposed to contain concepts like InputIterator or RandomAccessIterator. To distinguish between the concepts and the old trait-like requirements cppreference uses LegacyRandomAccessIterator and so on for pre-concept requirements and RandomAccessIterator and so for concept requirements.
And so yes, std::vector::iterator meets requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator and actually will be fulfilling RandomAccessIterator concept as well. This leads straight to conclusion that std::next called on vector::iterator has complexity O(1).
answered yesterday
bartopbartop
3,4231132
add a comment |
Does vector meet these requirements?
Yes, it does:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector
Quote: "iterator LegacyRandomAccessIterator"
And why "Legacy"?
The existing iterators have been renamed "legacy" because of the upcoming C++ library feature called ranges, which is a replacement for the current approach. Ranges will have new iterators. The existing ones will still be there, thus they're called "legacy."
answered yesterday
Nikos C.Nikos C.
34.2k53967
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55586847%2fis-stdnext-for-vector-on-or-o1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is a plan of adding concepts (compile time type constraints) in C++20. The new standard is supposed to contain concepts like InputIterator or RandomAccessIterator. To distinguish between the concepts and the old trait-like requirements cppreference uses LegacyRandomAccessIterator and so on for pre-concept requirements and RandomAccessIterator and so for concept requirements.
And so yes, std::vector::iterator meets requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator and actually will be fulfilling RandomAccessIterator concept as well. This leads straight to conclusion that std::next called on vector::iterator has complexity O(1).
answered yesterday
bartopbartop
3,4231132
add a comment |
There is a plan of adding concepts (compile time type constraints) in C++20. The new standard is supposed to contain concepts like InputIterator or RandomAccessIterator. To distinguish between the concepts and the old trait-like requirements cppreference uses LegacyRandomAccessIterator and so on for pre-concept requirements and RandomAccessIterator and so for concept requirements.
And so yes, std::vector::iterator meets requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator and actually will be fulfilling RandomAccessIterator concept as well. This leads straight to conclusion that std::next called on vector::iterator has complexity O(1).
answered yesterday
bartopbartop
3,4231132
add a comment |
There is a plan of adding concepts (compile time type constraints) in C++20. The new standard is supposed to contain concepts like InputIterator or RandomAccessIterator. To distinguish between the concepts and the old trait-like requirements cppreference uses LegacyRandomAccessIterator and so on for pre-concept requirements and RandomAccessIterator and so for concept requirements.
And so yes, std::vector::iterator meets requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator and actually will be fulfilling RandomAccessIterator concept as well. This leads straight to conclusion that std::next called on vector::iterator has complexity O(1).
answered yesterday
bartopbartop
3,4231132
There is a plan of adding concepts (compile time type constraints) in C++20. The new standard is supposed to contain concepts like InputIterator or RandomAccessIterator. To distinguish between the concepts and the old trait-like requirements cppreference uses LegacyRandomAccessIterator and so on for pre-concept requirements and RandomAccessIterator and so for concept requirements.
And so yes, std::vector::iterator meets requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator and actually will be fulfilling RandomAccessIterator concept as well. This leads straight to conclusion that std::next called on vector::iterator has complexity O(1).
answered yesterday
bartopbartop
3,4231132
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
bartopbartop
3,4231132
answered yesterday
bartopbartop
3,4231132
answered yesterday
bartopbartop
3,4231132
3,4231132
add a comment |
add a comment |
Does vector meet these requirements?
Yes, it does:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector
Quote: "iterator LegacyRandomAccessIterator"
And why "Legacy"?
The existing iterators have been renamed "legacy" because of the upcoming C++ library feature called ranges, which is a replacement for the current approach. Ranges will have new iterators. The existing ones will still be there, thus they're called "legacy."
answered yesterday
Nikos C.Nikos C.
34.2k53967
add a comment |
Does vector meet these requirements?
Yes, it does:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector
Quote: "iterator LegacyRandomAccessIterator"
And why "Legacy"?
The existing iterators have been renamed "legacy" because of the upcoming C++ library feature called ranges, which is a replacement for the current approach. Ranges will have new iterators. The existing ones will still be there, thus they're called "legacy."
answered yesterday
Nikos C.Nikos C.
34.2k53967
add a comment |
Does vector meet these requirements?
Yes, it does:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector
Quote: "iterator LegacyRandomAccessIterator"
And why "Legacy"?
The existing iterators have been renamed "legacy" because of the upcoming C++ library feature called ranges, which is a replacement for the current approach. Ranges will have new iterators. The existing ones will still be there, thus they're called "legacy."
answered yesterday
Nikos C.Nikos C.
34.2k53967
Does vector meet these requirements?
Yes, it does:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector
Quote: "iterator LegacyRandomAccessIterator"
And why "Legacy"?
The existing iterators have been renamed "legacy" because of the upcoming C++ library feature called ranges, which is a replacement for the current approach. Ranges will have new iterators. The existing ones will still be there, thus they're called "legacy."
answered yesterday
Nikos C.Nikos C.
34.2k53967
answered yesterday
Nikos C.Nikos C.
34.2k53967
answered yesterday
Nikos C.Nikos C.
34.2k53967
answered yesterday
Nikos C.Nikos C.
34.2k53967
34.2k53967
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55586847%2fis-stdnext-for-vector-on-or-o1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
12
"Constant" means
O(1).– Some programmer dude
yesterday
1
I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?
– Martin Perry
yesterday
4
@MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in the
std::vectorreference).– Some programmer dude
yesterday