Where does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InParashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverWhat rules did Hamechaber set to himself before compiling the Shulchan Aruch?Shulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?5th part of the shulchan aruchLearning to translate the Shulchan Aruch
Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?
Why do we hear so much about the Trump administration deciding to impose and then remove tariffs?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
Is there any way to tell whether the shot is going to hit you or not?
Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?
FPGA - DIY Programming
How to manage monthly salary
Why did Acorn's A3000 have red function keys?
Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?
Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?
Can a flute soloist sit?
Earliest use of the term "Galois extension"?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?
Geography at the pixel level
One word riddle: Vowel in the middle
Is a "Democratic" Oligarchy-Style System Possible?
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Write faster on AT24C32
Identify boardgame from Big movie
Why not us interferometry to take a picture of Pluto?
Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?
Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT
Am I thawing this London Broil safely?
Where does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InParashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverWhat rules did Hamechaber set to himself before compiling the Shulchan Aruch?Shulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?5th part of the shulchan aruchLearning to translate the Shulchan Aruch
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
edited yesterday
Al Berko
6,5371529
asked 2 days ago
DonielFDonielF
17.1k12690
add a comment |
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
edited yesterday
Al Berko
6,5371529
asked 2 days ago
DonielFDonielF
17.1k12690
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
yesterday
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
yesterday
add a comment |
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
edited yesterday
Al Berko
6,5371529
asked 2 days ago
DonielFDonielF
17.1k12690
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
shulchan-aruch
edited yesterday
Al Berko
6,5371529
asked 2 days ago
DonielFDonielF
17.1k12690
edited yesterday
Al Berko
6,5371529
asked 2 days ago
DonielFDonielF
17.1k12690
edited yesterday
Al Berko
6,5371529
edited yesterday
Al Berko
6,5371529
edited yesterday
Al Berko
6,5371529
6,5371529
asked 2 days ago
DonielFDonielF
17.1k12690
asked 2 days ago
DonielFDonielF
17.1k12690
asked 2 days ago
DonielFDonielF
17.1k12690
17.1k12690
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
yesterday
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
yesterday
add a comment |
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
yesterday
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
yesterday
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago
2
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
yesterday
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
yesterday
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
yesterday
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered 2 days ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
2 days ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
2 days ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
add a comment |
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
add a comment |
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
answered yesterday
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
23.5k157134
add a comment |
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered 2 days ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
2 days ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
2 days ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered 2 days ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
2 days ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
2 days ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered 2 days ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered 2 days ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered 2 days ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered 2 days ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered 2 days ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
2 days ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
2 days ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
add a comment |
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
2 days ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
2 days ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
2 days ago
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
2 days ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
2 days ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
2 days ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
yesterday
1
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
yesterday
add a comment |
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
yesterday
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
yesterday
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
yesterday