Is this homebrew racial feat, Stonehide, balanced?Does multi-classing into a martial class make you a member of martial class?Does the Sorcerer feature Draconic Resilience work with shields?Special AC and Wild ShapesIs this homebrew feat for a combat medic balanced?How should this homebrew class be rebalanced?Is this homebrew feat for bards balanced (or even useful)?Is this homebrew “Acrobatic Grappler” feat balanced?Is this homebrew “Throwing Weapons Master” feat balanced?Is this homebrew Elementalist Fighter class balanced?What is the Level Adjustment of this Gorilla Avatar of Nature template? (Version 2)

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?

How did Captain America manage to do this?

Is there any limitation with Arduino Nano serial communication distance?

Apply MapThread to all but one variable

Who is the Umpire in this picture?

Sci fi novel series with instant travel between planets through gates. A river runs through the gates

Why do games have consumables?

A Strange Latex Symbol

What do the phrase "Reeyan's seacrest" and the word "fraggle" mean in a sketch?

How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?

Noun clause (singular all the time?)

Why is it that the natural deduction method can't test for invalidity?

Binary Numbers Magic Trick

What language was spoken in East Asia before Proto-Turkic?

Error message with tabularx

What does the "ep" capability mean?

How to solve constants out of the internal energy equation?

Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?

Critique of timeline aesthetic

Is the 5 MB static resource size limit 5,242,880 bytes or 5,000,000 bytes?

French for 'It must be my imagination'?

Don’t seats that recline flat defeat the purpose of having seatbelts?

Does holding a wand and speaking its command word count as V/S/M spell components?



Is this homebrew racial feat, Stonehide, balanced?


Does multi-classing into a martial class make you a member of martial class?Does the Sorcerer feature Draconic Resilience work with shields?Special AC and Wild ShapesIs this homebrew feat for a combat medic balanced?How should this homebrew class be rebalanced?Is this homebrew feat for bards balanced (or even useful)?Is this homebrew “Acrobatic Grappler” feat balanced?Is this homebrew “Throwing Weapons Master” feat balanced?Is this homebrew Elementalist Fighter class balanced?What is the Level Adjustment of this Gorilla Avatar of Nature template? (Version 2)






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








17












$begingroup$


Is this homebrew racial feat, Stonehide, balanced?



This feat uses the Dragonborn racial feat Dragonhide and the UA Stone Sorcerer Stone's Durability feature as a basis.




Stonehide



Prerequisite: Dwarf or Gnome



The mystical link between your soul and the magic of elemental earth
grants you extraordinary resilience. You gain the following benefits:



  • Increase your Strength, Constitution, or Wisdom score by 1, to a
    maximum of 20.

  • As an action, you can gain a base AC of 13 + your Constitution modifier
    if you aren't wearing armor, and your skin assumes a stony appearance.
    This effect lasts until you end it as a bonus action, you are
    incapacitated, or you don armor other than a shield.

  • Your unarmed strike uses a d4 for damage as long as your Stonehide
    is active.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I don't get the action/bonus action mechanics. Most "alternative AC" just lets you use an optional calculation for AC. And "if you aren't wearing armor" would be redundant; you can use the armor calc, or the stonehide calc, at any point. Is there a reason behind that?
    $endgroup$
    – Yakk
    Apr 24 at 13:43










  • $begingroup$
    The 2nd bullet is not a permanent change unlike dragon scales. It takes an action to "assume a stony appearance" and gain the AC boost.
    $endgroup$
    – Unaligned Ooze
    Apr 24 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    For fluff reasons I assume? It needs rewording; as it stands, the stony appearance isn't attached to the AC change. (nor is the unarmed strike) I don't see any balance impact at all from those extra clauses (other than you cannot, say, wear "leather armor of stealth" and use your ability)
    $endgroup$
    – Yakk
    Apr 24 at 13:49











  • $begingroup$
    More than just fluff...also a slight nerf. A character runs the risk of losing the AC boost once becoming incapacitated. I made edits as you suggested.
    $endgroup$
    – Unaligned Ooze
    Apr 24 at 14:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would probably reword the bottom bullet to say that they may use d4 damage for unarmed strikes. Otherwise if you have a character like a monk who get's progression on their unarmed damage dice you would get a conflict where the monk could do d6 or some other higher damage but this feat states they only do d4, and technically the feat is more exact then the monk's class feature...
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    Apr 24 at 19:51

















17












$begingroup$


Is this homebrew racial feat, Stonehide, balanced?



This feat uses the Dragonborn racial feat Dragonhide and the UA Stone Sorcerer Stone's Durability feature as a basis.




Stonehide



Prerequisite: Dwarf or Gnome



The mystical link between your soul and the magic of elemental earth
grants you extraordinary resilience. You gain the following benefits:



  • Increase your Strength, Constitution, or Wisdom score by 1, to a
    maximum of 20.

  • As an action, you can gain a base AC of 13 + your Constitution modifier
    if you aren't wearing armor, and your skin assumes a stony appearance.
    This effect lasts until you end it as a bonus action, you are
    incapacitated, or you don armor other than a shield.

  • Your unarmed strike uses a d4 for damage as long as your Stonehide
    is active.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I don't get the action/bonus action mechanics. Most "alternative AC" just lets you use an optional calculation for AC. And "if you aren't wearing armor" would be redundant; you can use the armor calc, or the stonehide calc, at any point. Is there a reason behind that?
    $endgroup$
    – Yakk
    Apr 24 at 13:43










  • $begingroup$
    The 2nd bullet is not a permanent change unlike dragon scales. It takes an action to "assume a stony appearance" and gain the AC boost.
    $endgroup$
    – Unaligned Ooze
    Apr 24 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    For fluff reasons I assume? It needs rewording; as it stands, the stony appearance isn't attached to the AC change. (nor is the unarmed strike) I don't see any balance impact at all from those extra clauses (other than you cannot, say, wear "leather armor of stealth" and use your ability)
    $endgroup$
    – Yakk
    Apr 24 at 13:49











  • $begingroup$
    More than just fluff...also a slight nerf. A character runs the risk of losing the AC boost once becoming incapacitated. I made edits as you suggested.
    $endgroup$
    – Unaligned Ooze
    Apr 24 at 14:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would probably reword the bottom bullet to say that they may use d4 damage for unarmed strikes. Otherwise if you have a character like a monk who get's progression on their unarmed damage dice you would get a conflict where the monk could do d6 or some other higher damage but this feat states they only do d4, and technically the feat is more exact then the monk's class feature...
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    Apr 24 at 19:51













17












17








17


2



$begingroup$


Is this homebrew racial feat, Stonehide, balanced?



This feat uses the Dragonborn racial feat Dragonhide and the UA Stone Sorcerer Stone's Durability feature as a basis.




Stonehide



Prerequisite: Dwarf or Gnome



The mystical link between your soul and the magic of elemental earth
grants you extraordinary resilience. You gain the following benefits:



  • Increase your Strength, Constitution, or Wisdom score by 1, to a
    maximum of 20.

  • As an action, you can gain a base AC of 13 + your Constitution modifier
    if you aren't wearing armor, and your skin assumes a stony appearance.
    This effect lasts until you end it as a bonus action, you are
    incapacitated, or you don armor other than a shield.

  • Your unarmed strike uses a d4 for damage as long as your Stonehide
    is active.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is this homebrew racial feat, Stonehide, balanced?



This feat uses the Dragonborn racial feat Dragonhide and the UA Stone Sorcerer Stone's Durability feature as a basis.




Stonehide



Prerequisite: Dwarf or Gnome



The mystical link between your soul and the magic of elemental earth
grants you extraordinary resilience. You gain the following benefits:



  • Increase your Strength, Constitution, or Wisdom score by 1, to a
    maximum of 20.

  • As an action, you can gain a base AC of 13 + your Constitution modifier
    if you aren't wearing armor, and your skin assumes a stony appearance.
    This effect lasts until you end it as a bonus action, you are
    incapacitated, or you don armor other than a shield.

  • Your unarmed strike uses a d4 for damage as long as your Stonehide
    is active.







dnd-5e feats homebrew balance






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 24 at 21:44









V2Blast

28.1k5101171




28.1k5101171










asked Apr 24 at 11:52









Unaligned OozeUnaligned Ooze

24711




24711











  • $begingroup$
    I don't get the action/bonus action mechanics. Most "alternative AC" just lets you use an optional calculation for AC. And "if you aren't wearing armor" would be redundant; you can use the armor calc, or the stonehide calc, at any point. Is there a reason behind that?
    $endgroup$
    – Yakk
    Apr 24 at 13:43










  • $begingroup$
    The 2nd bullet is not a permanent change unlike dragon scales. It takes an action to "assume a stony appearance" and gain the AC boost.
    $endgroup$
    – Unaligned Ooze
    Apr 24 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    For fluff reasons I assume? It needs rewording; as it stands, the stony appearance isn't attached to the AC change. (nor is the unarmed strike) I don't see any balance impact at all from those extra clauses (other than you cannot, say, wear "leather armor of stealth" and use your ability)
    $endgroup$
    – Yakk
    Apr 24 at 13:49











  • $begingroup$
    More than just fluff...also a slight nerf. A character runs the risk of losing the AC boost once becoming incapacitated. I made edits as you suggested.
    $endgroup$
    – Unaligned Ooze
    Apr 24 at 14:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would probably reword the bottom bullet to say that they may use d4 damage for unarmed strikes. Otherwise if you have a character like a monk who get's progression on their unarmed damage dice you would get a conflict where the monk could do d6 or some other higher damage but this feat states they only do d4, and technically the feat is more exact then the monk's class feature...
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    Apr 24 at 19:51
















  • $begingroup$
    I don't get the action/bonus action mechanics. Most "alternative AC" just lets you use an optional calculation for AC. And "if you aren't wearing armor" would be redundant; you can use the armor calc, or the stonehide calc, at any point. Is there a reason behind that?
    $endgroup$
    – Yakk
    Apr 24 at 13:43










  • $begingroup$
    The 2nd bullet is not a permanent change unlike dragon scales. It takes an action to "assume a stony appearance" and gain the AC boost.
    $endgroup$
    – Unaligned Ooze
    Apr 24 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    For fluff reasons I assume? It needs rewording; as it stands, the stony appearance isn't attached to the AC change. (nor is the unarmed strike) I don't see any balance impact at all from those extra clauses (other than you cannot, say, wear "leather armor of stealth" and use your ability)
    $endgroup$
    – Yakk
    Apr 24 at 13:49











  • $begingroup$
    More than just fluff...also a slight nerf. A character runs the risk of losing the AC boost once becoming incapacitated. I made edits as you suggested.
    $endgroup$
    – Unaligned Ooze
    Apr 24 at 14:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would probably reword the bottom bullet to say that they may use d4 damage for unarmed strikes. Otherwise if you have a character like a monk who get's progression on their unarmed damage dice you would get a conflict where the monk could do d6 or some other higher damage but this feat states they only do d4, and technically the feat is more exact then the monk's class feature...
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    Apr 24 at 19:51















$begingroup$
I don't get the action/bonus action mechanics. Most "alternative AC" just lets you use an optional calculation for AC. And "if you aren't wearing armor" would be redundant; you can use the armor calc, or the stonehide calc, at any point. Is there a reason behind that?
$endgroup$
– Yakk
Apr 24 at 13:43




$begingroup$
I don't get the action/bonus action mechanics. Most "alternative AC" just lets you use an optional calculation for AC. And "if you aren't wearing armor" would be redundant; you can use the armor calc, or the stonehide calc, at any point. Is there a reason behind that?
$endgroup$
– Yakk
Apr 24 at 13:43












$begingroup$
The 2nd bullet is not a permanent change unlike dragon scales. It takes an action to "assume a stony appearance" and gain the AC boost.
$endgroup$
– Unaligned Ooze
Apr 24 at 13:48




$begingroup$
The 2nd bullet is not a permanent change unlike dragon scales. It takes an action to "assume a stony appearance" and gain the AC boost.
$endgroup$
– Unaligned Ooze
Apr 24 at 13:48












$begingroup$
For fluff reasons I assume? It needs rewording; as it stands, the stony appearance isn't attached to the AC change. (nor is the unarmed strike) I don't see any balance impact at all from those extra clauses (other than you cannot, say, wear "leather armor of stealth" and use your ability)
$endgroup$
– Yakk
Apr 24 at 13:49





$begingroup$
For fluff reasons I assume? It needs rewording; as it stands, the stony appearance isn't attached to the AC change. (nor is the unarmed strike) I don't see any balance impact at all from those extra clauses (other than you cannot, say, wear "leather armor of stealth" and use your ability)
$endgroup$
– Yakk
Apr 24 at 13:49













$begingroup$
More than just fluff...also a slight nerf. A character runs the risk of losing the AC boost once becoming incapacitated. I made edits as you suggested.
$endgroup$
– Unaligned Ooze
Apr 24 at 14:07




$begingroup$
More than just fluff...also a slight nerf. A character runs the risk of losing the AC boost once becoming incapacitated. I made edits as you suggested.
$endgroup$
– Unaligned Ooze
Apr 24 at 14:07




1




1




$begingroup$
I would probably reword the bottom bullet to say that they may use d4 damage for unarmed strikes. Otherwise if you have a character like a monk who get's progression on their unarmed damage dice you would get a conflict where the monk could do d6 or some other higher damage but this feat states they only do d4, and technically the feat is more exact then the monk's class feature...
$endgroup$
– dsollen
Apr 24 at 19:51




$begingroup$
I would probably reword the bottom bullet to say that they may use d4 damage for unarmed strikes. Otherwise if you have a character like a monk who get's progression on their unarmed damage dice you would get a conflict where the monk could do d6 or some other higher damage but this feat states they only do d4, and technically the feat is more exact then the monk's class feature...
$endgroup$
– dsollen
Apr 24 at 19:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















24












$begingroup$

More than likely, this is balanced



Your features almost directly mirror the features of the Dragon Hide feat.



  • The same ability increase except offering Wisdom instead of Charisma

  • AC of 13 + Constitution modifier rather than Dexterity modifier

  • 1d4 + Strength bludgeoning damage rather than slashing damage on unarmed strikes

As such, the feature is almost certainly balanced compared to official options.



However... there may be a slight unbalance in the fact that Constitution is used for the Armor Class. Typically, gaining such high effective Hit Points (EHP) requires investment in both Constitution (for the Hit Points) and Dexterity or Strength (for the Armor Class). Your feature allows similar range of EHP for just Constitution. This may not be too problematic since a character almost always has to invest in a different ability for the purposes of attacks or spells anyway, but it is a consideration that may reveal itself to be especially strong during playtesting.



At first, I considered whether it would be better to just use...




10 + Dexterity modifier + Constitution modifier




...to require two ability scores to reach the same Armor Class, but that would be substantially stronger for characters who have access to ample Ability Score Increases to reach beyond the 13 + Constitution modifier limits (characters like Dexterity-based fighters, rangers, and rogues). It may be more balanced in this way, or may be overpowered. I would probably playtest both versions.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146743%2fis-this-homebrew-racial-feat-stonehide-balanced%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    24












    $begingroup$

    More than likely, this is balanced



    Your features almost directly mirror the features of the Dragon Hide feat.



    • The same ability increase except offering Wisdom instead of Charisma

    • AC of 13 + Constitution modifier rather than Dexterity modifier

    • 1d4 + Strength bludgeoning damage rather than slashing damage on unarmed strikes

    As such, the feature is almost certainly balanced compared to official options.



    However... there may be a slight unbalance in the fact that Constitution is used for the Armor Class. Typically, gaining such high effective Hit Points (EHP) requires investment in both Constitution (for the Hit Points) and Dexterity or Strength (for the Armor Class). Your feature allows similar range of EHP for just Constitution. This may not be too problematic since a character almost always has to invest in a different ability for the purposes of attacks or spells anyway, but it is a consideration that may reveal itself to be especially strong during playtesting.



    At first, I considered whether it would be better to just use...




    10 + Dexterity modifier + Constitution modifier




    ...to require two ability scores to reach the same Armor Class, but that would be substantially stronger for characters who have access to ample Ability Score Increases to reach beyond the 13 + Constitution modifier limits (characters like Dexterity-based fighters, rangers, and rogues). It may be more balanced in this way, or may be overpowered. I would probably playtest both versions.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      24












      $begingroup$

      More than likely, this is balanced



      Your features almost directly mirror the features of the Dragon Hide feat.



      • The same ability increase except offering Wisdom instead of Charisma

      • AC of 13 + Constitution modifier rather than Dexterity modifier

      • 1d4 + Strength bludgeoning damage rather than slashing damage on unarmed strikes

      As such, the feature is almost certainly balanced compared to official options.



      However... there may be a slight unbalance in the fact that Constitution is used for the Armor Class. Typically, gaining such high effective Hit Points (EHP) requires investment in both Constitution (for the Hit Points) and Dexterity or Strength (for the Armor Class). Your feature allows similar range of EHP for just Constitution. This may not be too problematic since a character almost always has to invest in a different ability for the purposes of attacks or spells anyway, but it is a consideration that may reveal itself to be especially strong during playtesting.



      At first, I considered whether it would be better to just use...




      10 + Dexterity modifier + Constitution modifier




      ...to require two ability scores to reach the same Armor Class, but that would be substantially stronger for characters who have access to ample Ability Score Increases to reach beyond the 13 + Constitution modifier limits (characters like Dexterity-based fighters, rangers, and rogues). It may be more balanced in this way, or may be overpowered. I would probably playtest both versions.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        24












        24








        24





        $begingroup$

        More than likely, this is balanced



        Your features almost directly mirror the features of the Dragon Hide feat.



        • The same ability increase except offering Wisdom instead of Charisma

        • AC of 13 + Constitution modifier rather than Dexterity modifier

        • 1d4 + Strength bludgeoning damage rather than slashing damage on unarmed strikes

        As such, the feature is almost certainly balanced compared to official options.



        However... there may be a slight unbalance in the fact that Constitution is used for the Armor Class. Typically, gaining such high effective Hit Points (EHP) requires investment in both Constitution (for the Hit Points) and Dexterity or Strength (for the Armor Class). Your feature allows similar range of EHP for just Constitution. This may not be too problematic since a character almost always has to invest in a different ability for the purposes of attacks or spells anyway, but it is a consideration that may reveal itself to be especially strong during playtesting.



        At first, I considered whether it would be better to just use...




        10 + Dexterity modifier + Constitution modifier




        ...to require two ability scores to reach the same Armor Class, but that would be substantially stronger for characters who have access to ample Ability Score Increases to reach beyond the 13 + Constitution modifier limits (characters like Dexterity-based fighters, rangers, and rogues). It may be more balanced in this way, or may be overpowered. I would probably playtest both versions.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        More than likely, this is balanced



        Your features almost directly mirror the features of the Dragon Hide feat.



        • The same ability increase except offering Wisdom instead of Charisma

        • AC of 13 + Constitution modifier rather than Dexterity modifier

        • 1d4 + Strength bludgeoning damage rather than slashing damage on unarmed strikes

        As such, the feature is almost certainly balanced compared to official options.



        However... there may be a slight unbalance in the fact that Constitution is used for the Armor Class. Typically, gaining such high effective Hit Points (EHP) requires investment in both Constitution (for the Hit Points) and Dexterity or Strength (for the Armor Class). Your feature allows similar range of EHP for just Constitution. This may not be too problematic since a character almost always has to invest in a different ability for the purposes of attacks or spells anyway, but it is a consideration that may reveal itself to be especially strong during playtesting.



        At first, I considered whether it would be better to just use...




        10 + Dexterity modifier + Constitution modifier




        ...to require two ability scores to reach the same Armor Class, but that would be substantially stronger for characters who have access to ample Ability Score Increases to reach beyond the 13 + Constitution modifier limits (characters like Dexterity-based fighters, rangers, and rogues). It may be more balanced in this way, or may be overpowered. I would probably playtest both versions.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 25 at 1:01

























        answered Apr 24 at 12:19









        David CoffronDavid Coffron

        41.1k3140296




        41.1k3140296



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146743%2fis-this-homebrew-racial-feat-stonehide-balanced%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?