Do I need to protect SFP ports and optics from dust/contaminants? If so, how?Difference between LR and ZR 10Gb OpticsWhen connecting 3 switch in Spanning tree, Should I use Switch port or SFP ports?SFP+ complains threshold violation and went downDell R720 and Cisco 2960S SFP+ connectionHow to patch fiber connection from secured to unsecured portsSFP GBIC and OS ratingHow to troubleshoot reason why ARP replies from ISP are not forwarded through our switch?Connection from a BIDI to a uni SFPDiifference between sfp/sfp+ ports and unified portsLACP and how to configure switches correctly
What is the difference between `command a[bc]d` and `command `ab,cd`
How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?
Meaning of Bloch representation
Term for maladaptive animal behavior that will lead to their demise?
Please, smoke with good manners
Mac Pro install disk keeps ejecting itself
Rivers without rain
What are the potential pitfalls when using metals as a currency?
Is there any limitation with Arduino Nano serial communication distance?
Any examples of headwear for races with animal ears?
How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?
How to reduce LED flash rate (frequency)
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
a sore throat vs a strep throat vs strep throat
How come there are so many candidates for the 2020 Democratic party presidential nomination?
US visa is under administrative processing, I need the passport back ASAP
Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"
Pass By Reference VS Pass by Value
What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?
Is contacting this expert in the field something acceptable or would it be discourteous?
What does the "ep" capability mean?
How to solve constants out of the internal energy equation?
Examples of subgroups where it's nontrivial to show closure under multiplication?
What language was spoken in East Asia before Proto-Turkic?
Do I need to protect SFP ports and optics from dust/contaminants? If so, how?
Difference between LR and ZR 10Gb OpticsWhen connecting 3 switch in Spanning tree, Should I use Switch port or SFP ports?SFP+ complains threshold violation and went downDell R720 and Cisco 2960S SFP+ connectionHow to patch fiber connection from secured to unsecured portsSFP GBIC and OS ratingHow to troubleshoot reason why ARP replies from ISP are not forwarded through our switch?Connection from a BIDI to a uni SFPDiifference between sfp/sfp+ ports and unified portsLACP and how to configure switches correctly
I have a used switch with some SFP ports and some SFP modules installed, which I don't use.
All new switches come with little rubbery bungs that block up unused SFP ports, but since this old procurve was in use, those bungs are gone.
1) Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Similarly, two of my ports have an SFP module installed, but I don't need to use them. They were used in the past and there are no smaller bungs to protect their LC port-holes.
2) Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
3) Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
SFP module with bung protecting LC ports.
SFP module without protection
switch fiber sfp
add a comment |
I have a used switch with some SFP ports and some SFP modules installed, which I don't use.
All new switches come with little rubbery bungs that block up unused SFP ports, but since this old procurve was in use, those bungs are gone.
1) Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Similarly, two of my ports have an SFP module installed, but I don't need to use them. They were used in the past and there are no smaller bungs to protect their LC port-holes.
2) Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
3) Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
SFP module with bung protecting LC ports.
SFP module without protection
switch fiber sfp
3
A lot depends on how dusty your environment is. For my industrial work, I often tape up unused ether and SFP module sockets with masking tape; in nice filtered machine rooms I don't. But keep the optical paths covered, I use masking tape again, as I always lose the rubber stoppers. I keep the SFP modules in place, otherwise I lose those too.
– jonathanjo
Apr 24 at 12:23
2
In sort: YES. No matter how clean you think the place is, there will be dust. (or as in our last office, some jack*** will cut a hole through the wall, and leave it. they actually cut several, ran conduit, and reapplied fire guard -- in an ACTIVE DATA CENTER!)
– Ricky Beam
Apr 24 at 16:58
Sorry for the multi-part question, but they're all closely related and about unused SFP/ports.
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:14
add a comment |
I have a used switch with some SFP ports and some SFP modules installed, which I don't use.
All new switches come with little rubbery bungs that block up unused SFP ports, but since this old procurve was in use, those bungs are gone.
1) Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Similarly, two of my ports have an SFP module installed, but I don't need to use them. They were used in the past and there are no smaller bungs to protect their LC port-holes.
2) Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
3) Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
SFP module with bung protecting LC ports.
SFP module without protection
switch fiber sfp
I have a used switch with some SFP ports and some SFP modules installed, which I don't use.
All new switches come with little rubbery bungs that block up unused SFP ports, but since this old procurve was in use, those bungs are gone.
1) Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Similarly, two of my ports have an SFP module installed, but I don't need to use them. They were used in the past and there are no smaller bungs to protect their LC port-holes.
2) Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
3) Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
SFP module with bung protecting LC ports.
SFP module without protection
switch fiber sfp
switch fiber sfp
edited Apr 24 at 19:35
Zac67
33.6k22167
33.6k22167
asked Apr 24 at 11:26
CriggieCriggie
36919
36919
3
A lot depends on how dusty your environment is. For my industrial work, I often tape up unused ether and SFP module sockets with masking tape; in nice filtered machine rooms I don't. But keep the optical paths covered, I use masking tape again, as I always lose the rubber stoppers. I keep the SFP modules in place, otherwise I lose those too.
– jonathanjo
Apr 24 at 12:23
2
In sort: YES. No matter how clean you think the place is, there will be dust. (or as in our last office, some jack*** will cut a hole through the wall, and leave it. they actually cut several, ran conduit, and reapplied fire guard -- in an ACTIVE DATA CENTER!)
– Ricky Beam
Apr 24 at 16:58
Sorry for the multi-part question, but they're all closely related and about unused SFP/ports.
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:14
add a comment |
3
A lot depends on how dusty your environment is. For my industrial work, I often tape up unused ether and SFP module sockets with masking tape; in nice filtered machine rooms I don't. But keep the optical paths covered, I use masking tape again, as I always lose the rubber stoppers. I keep the SFP modules in place, otherwise I lose those too.
– jonathanjo
Apr 24 at 12:23
2
In sort: YES. No matter how clean you think the place is, there will be dust. (or as in our last office, some jack*** will cut a hole through the wall, and leave it. they actually cut several, ran conduit, and reapplied fire guard -- in an ACTIVE DATA CENTER!)
– Ricky Beam
Apr 24 at 16:58
Sorry for the multi-part question, but they're all closely related and about unused SFP/ports.
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:14
3
3
A lot depends on how dusty your environment is. For my industrial work, I often tape up unused ether and SFP module sockets with masking tape; in nice filtered machine rooms I don't. But keep the optical paths covered, I use masking tape again, as I always lose the rubber stoppers. I keep the SFP modules in place, otherwise I lose those too.
– jonathanjo
Apr 24 at 12:23
A lot depends on how dusty your environment is. For my industrial work, I often tape up unused ether and SFP module sockets with masking tape; in nice filtered machine rooms I don't. But keep the optical paths covered, I use masking tape again, as I always lose the rubber stoppers. I keep the SFP modules in place, otherwise I lose those too.
– jonathanjo
Apr 24 at 12:23
2
2
In sort: YES. No matter how clean you think the place is, there will be dust. (or as in our last office, some jack*** will cut a hole through the wall, and leave it. they actually cut several, ran conduit, and reapplied fire guard -- in an ACTIVE DATA CENTER!)
– Ricky Beam
Apr 24 at 16:58
In sort: YES. No matter how clean you think the place is, there will be dust. (or as in our last office, some jack*** will cut a hole through the wall, and leave it. they actually cut several, ran conduit, and reapplied fire guard -- in an ACTIVE DATA CENTER!)
– Ricky Beam
Apr 24 at 16:58
Sorry for the multi-part question, but they're all closely related and about unused SFP/ports.
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:14
Sorry for the multi-part question, but they're all closely related and about unused SFP/ports.
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:14
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Empty SFP slots should be covered when not in use, so no dust is sucked up by the system fan - depending on how dusty the environment is, pressure of the fan etc, this isn't required at all times. Do make sure the slot is clean before inserting a module though.
You can use just about anything, even a piece of tape provided there's no sticky residue. Most RJ45 fillers fit pretty well.
Similarly, two of my ports have an SFP module installed, but I don't need to use them. They were used in the past and there are no smaller bungs to protect their LC port-holes.
You do need to protect unused LC jacks from dust. If some dust settles inside the connector it might be pushed to the end face when a connector is plugged. Dirt causes high attenuation including link loss and can be very hard to remove. Also, when the end face gets scratched you need replacement. If you remove unused SFPs and store them in a clean container that's fine as well. Don't forget about empty panel jacks, they're even harder to clean or replace.
Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
You need to protect both, receive and transmit sides, from dirt.
Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
You'd want to remove unused SFP modules. Leaving them idle still ages their electronics and optics (although modern SFPs have a pretty long service life) and saves energy (each watt amounts to 8.8 kWh per year).
Make sure you know (mark) where the transceiver belongs to, so you don't end up troubleshooting a failing link when the SFP simply isn't compatible.
2
8.8kWh wasted is an incredibly high when you think about it. This is the needed energy to drive 60km with a 1730kg Tesla Model 3.
– Nakrule
2 days ago
@Nakrule It does seem quite high, but the figure is over a year. 8800 Watt Hours over a year is almost exactly one watt-hour every hour, which means 1 Watt. sopto.com/learningcenter_learningcenter_176/… suggests 1.5-3.5 Watts per 10G SFP, so its surprisingly all in the same ballpark. There are a lot of hours in a year.
– Criggie
2 days ago
An average year has 365.25 * 24 = 8,766 hours. 1 W * 8,766 h = 8,766 Wh = 8.766 kWh.
– Zac67
2 days ago
add a comment |
Cisco writes the following about the dust caps:
For optical SFP transceiver modules, before removing the dust plugs
and making any optical connections, observe the following guidelines:
Always keep the protective dust plugs on the unplugged fiber-optic cable connectors and the transceiver optical bores until you are ready
to make a connection.
Always inspect and clean the LC connector end-faces just before making any connections. See the Tip on this page for a pointer to a
fiber-optic inspection and cleaning white paper.
Tip: For complete information on inspecting and cleaning fiber-optic connections, see the white-paper document at this URL:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/optical/synchronous-digital-hierarchy-sdh/51834-cleanfiber2.html
- Always grasp the LC connector housing to plug or unplug a fiber-optic cable.
More info in the following link:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/installation/note/78_15160.html
Also, as written by serverAdmin123, i would disconnect the transceiver and get some dust caps to keep them protected.
add a comment |
Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Need to? Generally speaking no you don't need to do so. I have seen equipment used in construction trailers for years which have worked just fine when a SFP/GBIC is installed later.
However, I would recommend you do so. Why? Because there is the chance of causing a failure that could be more costly and/or time consuming than if you had put in a tiny amount of preventative work. Like many things, if you put a little more effort in when you have the opportunity, it will often save you (or someone else) a lot of time and/or frustration that could be avoided.
If you don't have something specific to the task, I personally like gaff/gaffer tape as it rips easily and tends to leave little to no residue when you remove it.
Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
Again, need? No, but you should do so. If you don't have the caps to do so properly something as simple as a plastic bag or box that seals will avoid most of the potential problems. If something like that isn't handy, a small piece of the aforementioned gaffer tape will work in a pinch.
In any event, I always recommend getting and using a proper fiber cleaning kit whenever you make fiber connections. Always clean connectors and cables on both ends when making the connection. If you have it, some sort of fiber scope for inspections also helps.
I can't begin to count the times where a simple cleaning has stopped errors or low power issues on "problematic" fiber runs. Even with new equipment/cables that have never been used and have been capped, I often find that if you inspect them with a scope you will find traces of oil or residue from the factory present on the face of the fiber.
Let me say it again. Put in a little more effort when you have the opportunity and it will often save you (or others) time and/or frustration that can be avoided.
Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
Let me ask, generally speaking, should you power off and/or unplug electronics you are not using? Same general answers apply.
First, electronics have a "life" expectancy. The longer they are in use, the more likely they will fail (excluding early failures often caused by defect). SFPs that are plugged in will be "in use" even if you connect no cable to them. While their MTBF (mean time between failure) may be significantly higher than the life of the equipment you are using them in, why tempt fate?
Second, it is a waste of power. While the power draw may be relatively tiny, it isn't to be overlooked. In data centers, there may be tight power/cooling budgets that any little bit helps. Or an organization may potentially have hundreds or thousands of SFPs that could be removed, multiplying that relatively tiny amount of power into something more significant (and costly). Finally, being green is good for everyone.
Excellent points. In the past I've removed ram from a FreeNAS server because it simply wasn't being used according to records. (96 GB, host was using ~12GB)
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:13
add a comment |
I think this is a somewhat broader question and i will put answer as much as simple. You need to protect Empty SFP module. You can purchase additional dust cap if it is required.
Generally most of electronic device has environmental requirements. If you can provide required environment device can have more durability.
I am confusing about your second question and third point is depend on environment. If you can provide better environment for transceivers than your server room. Definitely Answer is 'yes'. It will help to increase life time of transceiver.
Not only that I think it is good for any electronic device.
In addition to that follow device manual you can find many best practices which are recommended by manufacture.
add a comment |
While you should follow the manufacturer recommendations, I've seen dozens of SFP without dust caps in various states. Unfortunately not everyone you work with will be as diligent.
- Sitting on benches/desks
- Plugged into FC switches (Brocade dist., Cisco MCS, etc)
- Hanging half out of sfp ports
I've seen similar treatment for LC cables, though they generally hang with the connector facing down which reduces the chance of dust settling on the optic.
Personally I've never seen this introduce faults and have seen far more issues with failed SFP (ie: not detected on the copper side) and Cisco IOS not accepting SFP (there used to be a bug that IOS would not allow the newly manufactured SFP hardware address). Keeping in mind my sample set is relatively small, though I've not heard of anyone mention this causing issues.
Yes you should definitely spend the 2 seconds to chase down the rubber caps and put them back on, but it seems highly unlikely that it will introduce issues into your environment if someone failed to do it.
New contributor
I work with these devices every day, and I always see the SFPs (and QSFPs, CFPs, etc) just laying around. Never seen any issue either. We do, of course, clean them before using them again, though. If you aren't going to use a dust cap, definitely clean the SFP and the fiber before reconnecting.
– Patrick
Apr 24 at 15:32
add a comment |
I have worked in optic communications for over 10 years and have a lot of experience with dust, cleaning equipment, transceivers and fiber scopes. In my opinion it would make a lot of sense to disconnect the transceivers and store them in a safe place. First of all you will save energy, both in the switch and for the cooling system. It will keep switch temperature lower thus giving your switch more lifetime.
You won't need to cover the SFP cage's holes, there is only an electric connection in the back.
If you change transceivers very often you might run into connectivity issues as especially cheap equipment does not support a whole lot of connection cycles, but we are still talking about hundreds of transceiver swaps.
As for the transceivers themselves I strongly recommend dust caps. (Same applies for the LC connectors on the fibers). And do not assume they are clean when you buy them. I have seen dirty connectors on brand new cables, even with expensive brands. Always clean and check before you connect.
Cleaning transceivers is a different story. It MIGHT make sense but depends on the optics in use. There are usually 2 elements called TOSA and ROSA for transmitting and receiving. Some of them have accessable lenses you can clean with the right cleaning equipment (please no compressed air!) while others have a smaller hole in the middle and cleaning attempts will only make things worse. Unfortunately most transceiver vendors won't be able to tell you what they have in their transceivers, as most of them are OEM products anyway. The best way to check is using an electronic fiber scope.
Or - which works most of the time - you take the less professional approach and just take the chances and give it a try. Will also work for 80%+ ;-)
But I would not recommend this for dusty environments where I have seen a nearly 100% failure rate on optical connections when leaving them open for some time.
Hope this helps.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "496"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58692%2fdo-i-need-to-protect-sfp-ports-and-optics-from-dust-contaminants-if-so-how%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Empty SFP slots should be covered when not in use, so no dust is sucked up by the system fan - depending on how dusty the environment is, pressure of the fan etc, this isn't required at all times. Do make sure the slot is clean before inserting a module though.
You can use just about anything, even a piece of tape provided there's no sticky residue. Most RJ45 fillers fit pretty well.
Similarly, two of my ports have an SFP module installed, but I don't need to use them. They were used in the past and there are no smaller bungs to protect their LC port-holes.
You do need to protect unused LC jacks from dust. If some dust settles inside the connector it might be pushed to the end face when a connector is plugged. Dirt causes high attenuation including link loss and can be very hard to remove. Also, when the end face gets scratched you need replacement. If you remove unused SFPs and store them in a clean container that's fine as well. Don't forget about empty panel jacks, they're even harder to clean or replace.
Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
You need to protect both, receive and transmit sides, from dirt.
Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
You'd want to remove unused SFP modules. Leaving them idle still ages their electronics and optics (although modern SFPs have a pretty long service life) and saves energy (each watt amounts to 8.8 kWh per year).
Make sure you know (mark) where the transceiver belongs to, so you don't end up troubleshooting a failing link when the SFP simply isn't compatible.
2
8.8kWh wasted is an incredibly high when you think about it. This is the needed energy to drive 60km with a 1730kg Tesla Model 3.
– Nakrule
2 days ago
@Nakrule It does seem quite high, but the figure is over a year. 8800 Watt Hours over a year is almost exactly one watt-hour every hour, which means 1 Watt. sopto.com/learningcenter_learningcenter_176/… suggests 1.5-3.5 Watts per 10G SFP, so its surprisingly all in the same ballpark. There are a lot of hours in a year.
– Criggie
2 days ago
An average year has 365.25 * 24 = 8,766 hours. 1 W * 8,766 h = 8,766 Wh = 8.766 kWh.
– Zac67
2 days ago
add a comment |
Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Empty SFP slots should be covered when not in use, so no dust is sucked up by the system fan - depending on how dusty the environment is, pressure of the fan etc, this isn't required at all times. Do make sure the slot is clean before inserting a module though.
You can use just about anything, even a piece of tape provided there's no sticky residue. Most RJ45 fillers fit pretty well.
Similarly, two of my ports have an SFP module installed, but I don't need to use them. They were used in the past and there are no smaller bungs to protect their LC port-holes.
You do need to protect unused LC jacks from dust. If some dust settles inside the connector it might be pushed to the end face when a connector is plugged. Dirt causes high attenuation including link loss and can be very hard to remove. Also, when the end face gets scratched you need replacement. If you remove unused SFPs and store them in a clean container that's fine as well. Don't forget about empty panel jacks, they're even harder to clean or replace.
Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
You need to protect both, receive and transmit sides, from dirt.
Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
You'd want to remove unused SFP modules. Leaving them idle still ages their electronics and optics (although modern SFPs have a pretty long service life) and saves energy (each watt amounts to 8.8 kWh per year).
Make sure you know (mark) where the transceiver belongs to, so you don't end up troubleshooting a failing link when the SFP simply isn't compatible.
2
8.8kWh wasted is an incredibly high when you think about it. This is the needed energy to drive 60km with a 1730kg Tesla Model 3.
– Nakrule
2 days ago
@Nakrule It does seem quite high, but the figure is over a year. 8800 Watt Hours over a year is almost exactly one watt-hour every hour, which means 1 Watt. sopto.com/learningcenter_learningcenter_176/… suggests 1.5-3.5 Watts per 10G SFP, so its surprisingly all in the same ballpark. There are a lot of hours in a year.
– Criggie
2 days ago
An average year has 365.25 * 24 = 8,766 hours. 1 W * 8,766 h = 8,766 Wh = 8.766 kWh.
– Zac67
2 days ago
add a comment |
Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Empty SFP slots should be covered when not in use, so no dust is sucked up by the system fan - depending on how dusty the environment is, pressure of the fan etc, this isn't required at all times. Do make sure the slot is clean before inserting a module though.
You can use just about anything, even a piece of tape provided there's no sticky residue. Most RJ45 fillers fit pretty well.
Similarly, two of my ports have an SFP module installed, but I don't need to use them. They were used in the past and there are no smaller bungs to protect their LC port-holes.
You do need to protect unused LC jacks from dust. If some dust settles inside the connector it might be pushed to the end face when a connector is plugged. Dirt causes high attenuation including link loss and can be very hard to remove. Also, when the end face gets scratched you need replacement. If you remove unused SFPs and store them in a clean container that's fine as well. Don't forget about empty panel jacks, they're even harder to clean or replace.
Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
You need to protect both, receive and transmit sides, from dirt.
Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
You'd want to remove unused SFP modules. Leaving them idle still ages their electronics and optics (although modern SFPs have a pretty long service life) and saves energy (each watt amounts to 8.8 kWh per year).
Make sure you know (mark) where the transceiver belongs to, so you don't end up troubleshooting a failing link when the SFP simply isn't compatible.
Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Empty SFP slots should be covered when not in use, so no dust is sucked up by the system fan - depending on how dusty the environment is, pressure of the fan etc, this isn't required at all times. Do make sure the slot is clean before inserting a module though.
You can use just about anything, even a piece of tape provided there's no sticky residue. Most RJ45 fillers fit pretty well.
Similarly, two of my ports have an SFP module installed, but I don't need to use them. They were used in the past and there are no smaller bungs to protect their LC port-holes.
You do need to protect unused LC jacks from dust. If some dust settles inside the connector it might be pushed to the end face when a connector is plugged. Dirt causes high attenuation including link loss and can be very hard to remove. Also, when the end face gets scratched you need replacement. If you remove unused SFPs and store them in a clean container that's fine as well. Don't forget about empty panel jacks, they're even harder to clean or replace.
Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
You need to protect both, receive and transmit sides, from dirt.
Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
You'd want to remove unused SFP modules. Leaving them idle still ages their electronics and optics (although modern SFPs have a pretty long service life) and saves energy (each watt amounts to 8.8 kWh per year).
Make sure you know (mark) where the transceiver belongs to, so you don't end up troubleshooting a failing link when the SFP simply isn't compatible.
edited Apr 24 at 18:40
answered Apr 24 at 12:24
Zac67Zac67
33.6k22167
33.6k22167
2
8.8kWh wasted is an incredibly high when you think about it. This is the needed energy to drive 60km with a 1730kg Tesla Model 3.
– Nakrule
2 days ago
@Nakrule It does seem quite high, but the figure is over a year. 8800 Watt Hours over a year is almost exactly one watt-hour every hour, which means 1 Watt. sopto.com/learningcenter_learningcenter_176/… suggests 1.5-3.5 Watts per 10G SFP, so its surprisingly all in the same ballpark. There are a lot of hours in a year.
– Criggie
2 days ago
An average year has 365.25 * 24 = 8,766 hours. 1 W * 8,766 h = 8,766 Wh = 8.766 kWh.
– Zac67
2 days ago
add a comment |
2
8.8kWh wasted is an incredibly high when you think about it. This is the needed energy to drive 60km with a 1730kg Tesla Model 3.
– Nakrule
2 days ago
@Nakrule It does seem quite high, but the figure is over a year. 8800 Watt Hours over a year is almost exactly one watt-hour every hour, which means 1 Watt. sopto.com/learningcenter_learningcenter_176/… suggests 1.5-3.5 Watts per 10G SFP, so its surprisingly all in the same ballpark. There are a lot of hours in a year.
– Criggie
2 days ago
An average year has 365.25 * 24 = 8,766 hours. 1 W * 8,766 h = 8,766 Wh = 8.766 kWh.
– Zac67
2 days ago
2
2
8.8kWh wasted is an incredibly high when you think about it. This is the needed energy to drive 60km with a 1730kg Tesla Model 3.
– Nakrule
2 days ago
8.8kWh wasted is an incredibly high when you think about it. This is the needed energy to drive 60km with a 1730kg Tesla Model 3.
– Nakrule
2 days ago
@Nakrule It does seem quite high, but the figure is over a year. 8800 Watt Hours over a year is almost exactly one watt-hour every hour, which means 1 Watt. sopto.com/learningcenter_learningcenter_176/… suggests 1.5-3.5 Watts per 10G SFP, so its surprisingly all in the same ballpark. There are a lot of hours in a year.
– Criggie
2 days ago
@Nakrule It does seem quite high, but the figure is over a year. 8800 Watt Hours over a year is almost exactly one watt-hour every hour, which means 1 Watt. sopto.com/learningcenter_learningcenter_176/… suggests 1.5-3.5 Watts per 10G SFP, so its surprisingly all in the same ballpark. There are a lot of hours in a year.
– Criggie
2 days ago
An average year has 365.25 * 24 = 8,766 hours. 1 W * 8,766 h = 8,766 Wh = 8.766 kWh.
– Zac67
2 days ago
An average year has 365.25 * 24 = 8,766 hours. 1 W * 8,766 h = 8,766 Wh = 8.766 kWh.
– Zac67
2 days ago
add a comment |
Cisco writes the following about the dust caps:
For optical SFP transceiver modules, before removing the dust plugs
and making any optical connections, observe the following guidelines:
Always keep the protective dust plugs on the unplugged fiber-optic cable connectors and the transceiver optical bores until you are ready
to make a connection.
Always inspect and clean the LC connector end-faces just before making any connections. See the Tip on this page for a pointer to a
fiber-optic inspection and cleaning white paper.
Tip: For complete information on inspecting and cleaning fiber-optic connections, see the white-paper document at this URL:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/optical/synchronous-digital-hierarchy-sdh/51834-cleanfiber2.html
- Always grasp the LC connector housing to plug or unplug a fiber-optic cable.
More info in the following link:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/installation/note/78_15160.html
Also, as written by serverAdmin123, i would disconnect the transceiver and get some dust caps to keep them protected.
add a comment |
Cisco writes the following about the dust caps:
For optical SFP transceiver modules, before removing the dust plugs
and making any optical connections, observe the following guidelines:
Always keep the protective dust plugs on the unplugged fiber-optic cable connectors and the transceiver optical bores until you are ready
to make a connection.
Always inspect and clean the LC connector end-faces just before making any connections. See the Tip on this page for a pointer to a
fiber-optic inspection and cleaning white paper.
Tip: For complete information on inspecting and cleaning fiber-optic connections, see the white-paper document at this URL:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/optical/synchronous-digital-hierarchy-sdh/51834-cleanfiber2.html
- Always grasp the LC connector housing to plug or unplug a fiber-optic cable.
More info in the following link:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/installation/note/78_15160.html
Also, as written by serverAdmin123, i would disconnect the transceiver and get some dust caps to keep them protected.
add a comment |
Cisco writes the following about the dust caps:
For optical SFP transceiver modules, before removing the dust plugs
and making any optical connections, observe the following guidelines:
Always keep the protective dust plugs on the unplugged fiber-optic cable connectors and the transceiver optical bores until you are ready
to make a connection.
Always inspect and clean the LC connector end-faces just before making any connections. See the Tip on this page for a pointer to a
fiber-optic inspection and cleaning white paper.
Tip: For complete information on inspecting and cleaning fiber-optic connections, see the white-paper document at this URL:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/optical/synchronous-digital-hierarchy-sdh/51834-cleanfiber2.html
- Always grasp the LC connector housing to plug or unplug a fiber-optic cable.
More info in the following link:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/installation/note/78_15160.html
Also, as written by serverAdmin123, i would disconnect the transceiver and get some dust caps to keep them protected.
Cisco writes the following about the dust caps:
For optical SFP transceiver modules, before removing the dust plugs
and making any optical connections, observe the following guidelines:
Always keep the protective dust plugs on the unplugged fiber-optic cable connectors and the transceiver optical bores until you are ready
to make a connection.
Always inspect and clean the LC connector end-faces just before making any connections. See the Tip on this page for a pointer to a
fiber-optic inspection and cleaning white paper.
Tip: For complete information on inspecting and cleaning fiber-optic connections, see the white-paper document at this URL:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/optical/synchronous-digital-hierarchy-sdh/51834-cleanfiber2.html
- Always grasp the LC connector housing to plug or unplug a fiber-optic cable.
More info in the following link:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/installation/note/78_15160.html
Also, as written by serverAdmin123, i would disconnect the transceiver and get some dust caps to keep them protected.
answered Apr 24 at 12:14
user56700user56700
35617
35617
add a comment |
add a comment |
Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Need to? Generally speaking no you don't need to do so. I have seen equipment used in construction trailers for years which have worked just fine when a SFP/GBIC is installed later.
However, I would recommend you do so. Why? Because there is the chance of causing a failure that could be more costly and/or time consuming than if you had put in a tiny amount of preventative work. Like many things, if you put a little more effort in when you have the opportunity, it will often save you (or someone else) a lot of time and/or frustration that could be avoided.
If you don't have something specific to the task, I personally like gaff/gaffer tape as it rips easily and tends to leave little to no residue when you remove it.
Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
Again, need? No, but you should do so. If you don't have the caps to do so properly something as simple as a plastic bag or box that seals will avoid most of the potential problems. If something like that isn't handy, a small piece of the aforementioned gaffer tape will work in a pinch.
In any event, I always recommend getting and using a proper fiber cleaning kit whenever you make fiber connections. Always clean connectors and cables on both ends when making the connection. If you have it, some sort of fiber scope for inspections also helps.
I can't begin to count the times where a simple cleaning has stopped errors or low power issues on "problematic" fiber runs. Even with new equipment/cables that have never been used and have been capped, I often find that if you inspect them with a scope you will find traces of oil or residue from the factory present on the face of the fiber.
Let me say it again. Put in a little more effort when you have the opportunity and it will often save you (or others) time and/or frustration that can be avoided.
Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
Let me ask, generally speaking, should you power off and/or unplug electronics you are not using? Same general answers apply.
First, electronics have a "life" expectancy. The longer they are in use, the more likely they will fail (excluding early failures often caused by defect). SFPs that are plugged in will be "in use" even if you connect no cable to them. While their MTBF (mean time between failure) may be significantly higher than the life of the equipment you are using them in, why tempt fate?
Second, it is a waste of power. While the power draw may be relatively tiny, it isn't to be overlooked. In data centers, there may be tight power/cooling budgets that any little bit helps. Or an organization may potentially have hundreds or thousands of SFPs that could be removed, multiplying that relatively tiny amount of power into something more significant (and costly). Finally, being green is good for everyone.
Excellent points. In the past I've removed ram from a FreeNAS server because it simply wasn't being used according to records. (96 GB, host was using ~12GB)
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:13
add a comment |
Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Need to? Generally speaking no you don't need to do so. I have seen equipment used in construction trailers for years which have worked just fine when a SFP/GBIC is installed later.
However, I would recommend you do so. Why? Because there is the chance of causing a failure that could be more costly and/or time consuming than if you had put in a tiny amount of preventative work. Like many things, if you put a little more effort in when you have the opportunity, it will often save you (or someone else) a lot of time and/or frustration that could be avoided.
If you don't have something specific to the task, I personally like gaff/gaffer tape as it rips easily and tends to leave little to no residue when you remove it.
Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
Again, need? No, but you should do so. If you don't have the caps to do so properly something as simple as a plastic bag or box that seals will avoid most of the potential problems. If something like that isn't handy, a small piece of the aforementioned gaffer tape will work in a pinch.
In any event, I always recommend getting and using a proper fiber cleaning kit whenever you make fiber connections. Always clean connectors and cables on both ends when making the connection. If you have it, some sort of fiber scope for inspections also helps.
I can't begin to count the times where a simple cleaning has stopped errors or low power issues on "problematic" fiber runs. Even with new equipment/cables that have never been used and have been capped, I often find that if you inspect them with a scope you will find traces of oil or residue from the factory present on the face of the fiber.
Let me say it again. Put in a little more effort when you have the opportunity and it will often save you (or others) time and/or frustration that can be avoided.
Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
Let me ask, generally speaking, should you power off and/or unplug electronics you are not using? Same general answers apply.
First, electronics have a "life" expectancy. The longer they are in use, the more likely they will fail (excluding early failures often caused by defect). SFPs that are plugged in will be "in use" even if you connect no cable to them. While their MTBF (mean time between failure) may be significantly higher than the life of the equipment you are using them in, why tempt fate?
Second, it is a waste of power. While the power draw may be relatively tiny, it isn't to be overlooked. In data centers, there may be tight power/cooling budgets that any little bit helps. Or an organization may potentially have hundreds or thousands of SFPs that could be removed, multiplying that relatively tiny amount of power into something more significant (and costly). Finally, being green is good for everyone.
Excellent points. In the past I've removed ram from a FreeNAS server because it simply wasn't being used according to records. (96 GB, host was using ~12GB)
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:13
add a comment |
Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Need to? Generally speaking no you don't need to do so. I have seen equipment used in construction trailers for years which have worked just fine when a SFP/GBIC is installed later.
However, I would recommend you do so. Why? Because there is the chance of causing a failure that could be more costly and/or time consuming than if you had put in a tiny amount of preventative work. Like many things, if you put a little more effort in when you have the opportunity, it will often save you (or someone else) a lot of time and/or frustration that could be avoided.
If you don't have something specific to the task, I personally like gaff/gaffer tape as it rips easily and tends to leave little to no residue when you remove it.
Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
Again, need? No, but you should do so. If you don't have the caps to do so properly something as simple as a plastic bag or box that seals will avoid most of the potential problems. If something like that isn't handy, a small piece of the aforementioned gaffer tape will work in a pinch.
In any event, I always recommend getting and using a proper fiber cleaning kit whenever you make fiber connections. Always clean connectors and cables on both ends when making the connection. If you have it, some sort of fiber scope for inspections also helps.
I can't begin to count the times where a simple cleaning has stopped errors or low power issues on "problematic" fiber runs. Even with new equipment/cables that have never been used and have been capped, I often find that if you inspect them with a scope you will find traces of oil or residue from the factory present on the face of the fiber.
Let me say it again. Put in a little more effort when you have the opportunity and it will often save you (or others) time and/or frustration that can be avoided.
Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
Let me ask, generally speaking, should you power off and/or unplug electronics you are not using? Same general answers apply.
First, electronics have a "life" expectancy. The longer they are in use, the more likely they will fail (excluding early failures often caused by defect). SFPs that are plugged in will be "in use" even if you connect no cable to them. While their MTBF (mean time between failure) may be significantly higher than the life of the equipment you are using them in, why tempt fate?
Second, it is a waste of power. While the power draw may be relatively tiny, it isn't to be overlooked. In data centers, there may be tight power/cooling budgets that any little bit helps. Or an organization may potentially have hundreds or thousands of SFPs that could be removed, multiplying that relatively tiny amount of power into something more significant (and costly). Finally, being green is good for everyone.
Do I need to protect the physical empty SFP port? What's a good way to do so?
Need to? Generally speaking no you don't need to do so. I have seen equipment used in construction trailers for years which have worked just fine when a SFP/GBIC is installed later.
However, I would recommend you do so. Why? Because there is the chance of causing a failure that could be more costly and/or time consuming than if you had put in a tiny amount of preventative work. Like many things, if you put a little more effort in when you have the opportunity, it will often save you (or someone else) a lot of time and/or frustration that could be avoided.
If you don't have something specific to the task, I personally like gaff/gaffer tape as it rips easily and tends to leave little to no residue when you remove it.
Do I need to protect the one/two ports in a SFP module? If so, how?
Again, need? No, but you should do so. If you don't have the caps to do so properly something as simple as a plastic bag or box that seals will avoid most of the potential problems. If something like that isn't handy, a small piece of the aforementioned gaffer tape will work in a pinch.
In any event, I always recommend getting and using a proper fiber cleaning kit whenever you make fiber connections. Always clean connectors and cables on both ends when making the connection. If you have it, some sort of fiber scope for inspections also helps.
I can't begin to count the times where a simple cleaning has stopped errors or low power issues on "problematic" fiber runs. Even with new equipment/cables that have never been used and have been capped, I often find that if you inspect them with a scope you will find traces of oil or residue from the factory present on the face of the fiber.
Let me say it again. Put in a little more effort when you have the opportunity and it will often save you (or others) time and/or frustration that can be avoided.
Should I remove the unused SFPs from the switch and store them elsewhere?
Let me ask, generally speaking, should you power off and/or unplug electronics you are not using? Same general answers apply.
First, electronics have a "life" expectancy. The longer they are in use, the more likely they will fail (excluding early failures often caused by defect). SFPs that are plugged in will be "in use" even if you connect no cable to them. While their MTBF (mean time between failure) may be significantly higher than the life of the equipment you are using them in, why tempt fate?
Second, it is a waste of power. While the power draw may be relatively tiny, it isn't to be overlooked. In data centers, there may be tight power/cooling budgets that any little bit helps. Or an organization may potentially have hundreds or thousands of SFPs that could be removed, multiplying that relatively tiny amount of power into something more significant (and costly). Finally, being green is good for everyone.
answered Apr 24 at 19:59
YLearn♦YLearn
22.7k549107
22.7k549107
Excellent points. In the past I've removed ram from a FreeNAS server because it simply wasn't being used according to records. (96 GB, host was using ~12GB)
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:13
add a comment |
Excellent points. In the past I've removed ram from a FreeNAS server because it simply wasn't being used according to records. (96 GB, host was using ~12GB)
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:13
Excellent points. In the past I've removed ram from a FreeNAS server because it simply wasn't being used according to records. (96 GB, host was using ~12GB)
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:13
Excellent points. In the past I've removed ram from a FreeNAS server because it simply wasn't being used according to records. (96 GB, host was using ~12GB)
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:13
add a comment |
I think this is a somewhat broader question and i will put answer as much as simple. You need to protect Empty SFP module. You can purchase additional dust cap if it is required.
Generally most of electronic device has environmental requirements. If you can provide required environment device can have more durability.
I am confusing about your second question and third point is depend on environment. If you can provide better environment for transceivers than your server room. Definitely Answer is 'yes'. It will help to increase life time of transceiver.
Not only that I think it is good for any electronic device.
In addition to that follow device manual you can find many best practices which are recommended by manufacture.
add a comment |
I think this is a somewhat broader question and i will put answer as much as simple. You need to protect Empty SFP module. You can purchase additional dust cap if it is required.
Generally most of electronic device has environmental requirements. If you can provide required environment device can have more durability.
I am confusing about your second question and third point is depend on environment. If you can provide better environment for transceivers than your server room. Definitely Answer is 'yes'. It will help to increase life time of transceiver.
Not only that I think it is good for any electronic device.
In addition to that follow device manual you can find many best practices which are recommended by manufacture.
add a comment |
I think this is a somewhat broader question and i will put answer as much as simple. You need to protect Empty SFP module. You can purchase additional dust cap if it is required.
Generally most of electronic device has environmental requirements. If you can provide required environment device can have more durability.
I am confusing about your second question and third point is depend on environment. If you can provide better environment for transceivers than your server room. Definitely Answer is 'yes'. It will help to increase life time of transceiver.
Not only that I think it is good for any electronic device.
In addition to that follow device manual you can find many best practices which are recommended by manufacture.
I think this is a somewhat broader question and i will put answer as much as simple. You need to protect Empty SFP module. You can purchase additional dust cap if it is required.
Generally most of electronic device has environmental requirements. If you can provide required environment device can have more durability.
I am confusing about your second question and third point is depend on environment. If you can provide better environment for transceivers than your server room. Definitely Answer is 'yes'. It will help to increase life time of transceiver.
Not only that I think it is good for any electronic device.
In addition to that follow device manual you can find many best practices which are recommended by manufacture.
edited Apr 24 at 12:16
answered Apr 24 at 12:01
serverAdmin123serverAdmin123
45017
45017
add a comment |
add a comment |
While you should follow the manufacturer recommendations, I've seen dozens of SFP without dust caps in various states. Unfortunately not everyone you work with will be as diligent.
- Sitting on benches/desks
- Plugged into FC switches (Brocade dist., Cisco MCS, etc)
- Hanging half out of sfp ports
I've seen similar treatment for LC cables, though they generally hang with the connector facing down which reduces the chance of dust settling on the optic.
Personally I've never seen this introduce faults and have seen far more issues with failed SFP (ie: not detected on the copper side) and Cisco IOS not accepting SFP (there used to be a bug that IOS would not allow the newly manufactured SFP hardware address). Keeping in mind my sample set is relatively small, though I've not heard of anyone mention this causing issues.
Yes you should definitely spend the 2 seconds to chase down the rubber caps and put them back on, but it seems highly unlikely that it will introduce issues into your environment if someone failed to do it.
New contributor
I work with these devices every day, and I always see the SFPs (and QSFPs, CFPs, etc) just laying around. Never seen any issue either. We do, of course, clean them before using them again, though. If you aren't going to use a dust cap, definitely clean the SFP and the fiber before reconnecting.
– Patrick
Apr 24 at 15:32
add a comment |
While you should follow the manufacturer recommendations, I've seen dozens of SFP without dust caps in various states. Unfortunately not everyone you work with will be as diligent.
- Sitting on benches/desks
- Plugged into FC switches (Brocade dist., Cisco MCS, etc)
- Hanging half out of sfp ports
I've seen similar treatment for LC cables, though they generally hang with the connector facing down which reduces the chance of dust settling on the optic.
Personally I've never seen this introduce faults and have seen far more issues with failed SFP (ie: not detected on the copper side) and Cisco IOS not accepting SFP (there used to be a bug that IOS would not allow the newly manufactured SFP hardware address). Keeping in mind my sample set is relatively small, though I've not heard of anyone mention this causing issues.
Yes you should definitely spend the 2 seconds to chase down the rubber caps and put them back on, but it seems highly unlikely that it will introduce issues into your environment if someone failed to do it.
New contributor
I work with these devices every day, and I always see the SFPs (and QSFPs, CFPs, etc) just laying around. Never seen any issue either. We do, of course, clean them before using them again, though. If you aren't going to use a dust cap, definitely clean the SFP and the fiber before reconnecting.
– Patrick
Apr 24 at 15:32
add a comment |
While you should follow the manufacturer recommendations, I've seen dozens of SFP without dust caps in various states. Unfortunately not everyone you work with will be as diligent.
- Sitting on benches/desks
- Plugged into FC switches (Brocade dist., Cisco MCS, etc)
- Hanging half out of sfp ports
I've seen similar treatment for LC cables, though they generally hang with the connector facing down which reduces the chance of dust settling on the optic.
Personally I've never seen this introduce faults and have seen far more issues with failed SFP (ie: not detected on the copper side) and Cisco IOS not accepting SFP (there used to be a bug that IOS would not allow the newly manufactured SFP hardware address). Keeping in mind my sample set is relatively small, though I've not heard of anyone mention this causing issues.
Yes you should definitely spend the 2 seconds to chase down the rubber caps and put them back on, but it seems highly unlikely that it will introduce issues into your environment if someone failed to do it.
New contributor
While you should follow the manufacturer recommendations, I've seen dozens of SFP without dust caps in various states. Unfortunately not everyone you work with will be as diligent.
- Sitting on benches/desks
- Plugged into FC switches (Brocade dist., Cisco MCS, etc)
- Hanging half out of sfp ports
I've seen similar treatment for LC cables, though they generally hang with the connector facing down which reduces the chance of dust settling on the optic.
Personally I've never seen this introduce faults and have seen far more issues with failed SFP (ie: not detected on the copper side) and Cisco IOS not accepting SFP (there used to be a bug that IOS would not allow the newly manufactured SFP hardware address). Keeping in mind my sample set is relatively small, though I've not heard of anyone mention this causing issues.
Yes you should definitely spend the 2 seconds to chase down the rubber caps and put them back on, but it seems highly unlikely that it will introduce issues into your environment if someone failed to do it.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Apr 24 at 14:29
TomTechTomTech
211
211
New contributor
New contributor
I work with these devices every day, and I always see the SFPs (and QSFPs, CFPs, etc) just laying around. Never seen any issue either. We do, of course, clean them before using them again, though. If you aren't going to use a dust cap, definitely clean the SFP and the fiber before reconnecting.
– Patrick
Apr 24 at 15:32
add a comment |
I work with these devices every day, and I always see the SFPs (and QSFPs, CFPs, etc) just laying around. Never seen any issue either. We do, of course, clean them before using them again, though. If you aren't going to use a dust cap, definitely clean the SFP and the fiber before reconnecting.
– Patrick
Apr 24 at 15:32
I work with these devices every day, and I always see the SFPs (and QSFPs, CFPs, etc) just laying around. Never seen any issue either. We do, of course, clean them before using them again, though. If you aren't going to use a dust cap, definitely clean the SFP and the fiber before reconnecting.
– Patrick
Apr 24 at 15:32
I work with these devices every day, and I always see the SFPs (and QSFPs, CFPs, etc) just laying around. Never seen any issue either. We do, of course, clean them before using them again, though. If you aren't going to use a dust cap, definitely clean the SFP and the fiber before reconnecting.
– Patrick
Apr 24 at 15:32
add a comment |
I have worked in optic communications for over 10 years and have a lot of experience with dust, cleaning equipment, transceivers and fiber scopes. In my opinion it would make a lot of sense to disconnect the transceivers and store them in a safe place. First of all you will save energy, both in the switch and for the cooling system. It will keep switch temperature lower thus giving your switch more lifetime.
You won't need to cover the SFP cage's holes, there is only an electric connection in the back.
If you change transceivers very often you might run into connectivity issues as especially cheap equipment does not support a whole lot of connection cycles, but we are still talking about hundreds of transceiver swaps.
As for the transceivers themselves I strongly recommend dust caps. (Same applies for the LC connectors on the fibers). And do not assume they are clean when you buy them. I have seen dirty connectors on brand new cables, even with expensive brands. Always clean and check before you connect.
Cleaning transceivers is a different story. It MIGHT make sense but depends on the optics in use. There are usually 2 elements called TOSA and ROSA for transmitting and receiving. Some of them have accessable lenses you can clean with the right cleaning equipment (please no compressed air!) while others have a smaller hole in the middle and cleaning attempts will only make things worse. Unfortunately most transceiver vendors won't be able to tell you what they have in their transceivers, as most of them are OEM products anyway. The best way to check is using an electronic fiber scope.
Or - which works most of the time - you take the less professional approach and just take the chances and give it a try. Will also work for 80%+ ;-)
But I would not recommend this for dusty environments where I have seen a nearly 100% failure rate on optical connections when leaving them open for some time.
Hope this helps.
New contributor
add a comment |
I have worked in optic communications for over 10 years and have a lot of experience with dust, cleaning equipment, transceivers and fiber scopes. In my opinion it would make a lot of sense to disconnect the transceivers and store them in a safe place. First of all you will save energy, both in the switch and for the cooling system. It will keep switch temperature lower thus giving your switch more lifetime.
You won't need to cover the SFP cage's holes, there is only an electric connection in the back.
If you change transceivers very often you might run into connectivity issues as especially cheap equipment does not support a whole lot of connection cycles, but we are still talking about hundreds of transceiver swaps.
As for the transceivers themselves I strongly recommend dust caps. (Same applies for the LC connectors on the fibers). And do not assume they are clean when you buy them. I have seen dirty connectors on brand new cables, even with expensive brands. Always clean and check before you connect.
Cleaning transceivers is a different story. It MIGHT make sense but depends on the optics in use. There are usually 2 elements called TOSA and ROSA for transmitting and receiving. Some of them have accessable lenses you can clean with the right cleaning equipment (please no compressed air!) while others have a smaller hole in the middle and cleaning attempts will only make things worse. Unfortunately most transceiver vendors won't be able to tell you what they have in their transceivers, as most of them are OEM products anyway. The best way to check is using an electronic fiber scope.
Or - which works most of the time - you take the less professional approach and just take the chances and give it a try. Will also work for 80%+ ;-)
But I would not recommend this for dusty environments where I have seen a nearly 100% failure rate on optical connections when leaving them open for some time.
Hope this helps.
New contributor
add a comment |
I have worked in optic communications for over 10 years and have a lot of experience with dust, cleaning equipment, transceivers and fiber scopes. In my opinion it would make a lot of sense to disconnect the transceivers and store them in a safe place. First of all you will save energy, both in the switch and for the cooling system. It will keep switch temperature lower thus giving your switch more lifetime.
You won't need to cover the SFP cage's holes, there is only an electric connection in the back.
If you change transceivers very often you might run into connectivity issues as especially cheap equipment does not support a whole lot of connection cycles, but we are still talking about hundreds of transceiver swaps.
As for the transceivers themselves I strongly recommend dust caps. (Same applies for the LC connectors on the fibers). And do not assume they are clean when you buy them. I have seen dirty connectors on brand new cables, even with expensive brands. Always clean and check before you connect.
Cleaning transceivers is a different story. It MIGHT make sense but depends on the optics in use. There are usually 2 elements called TOSA and ROSA for transmitting and receiving. Some of them have accessable lenses you can clean with the right cleaning equipment (please no compressed air!) while others have a smaller hole in the middle and cleaning attempts will only make things worse. Unfortunately most transceiver vendors won't be able to tell you what they have in their transceivers, as most of them are OEM products anyway. The best way to check is using an electronic fiber scope.
Or - which works most of the time - you take the less professional approach and just take the chances and give it a try. Will also work for 80%+ ;-)
But I would not recommend this for dusty environments where I have seen a nearly 100% failure rate on optical connections when leaving them open for some time.
Hope this helps.
New contributor
I have worked in optic communications for over 10 years and have a lot of experience with dust, cleaning equipment, transceivers and fiber scopes. In my opinion it would make a lot of sense to disconnect the transceivers and store them in a safe place. First of all you will save energy, both in the switch and for the cooling system. It will keep switch temperature lower thus giving your switch more lifetime.
You won't need to cover the SFP cage's holes, there is only an electric connection in the back.
If you change transceivers very often you might run into connectivity issues as especially cheap equipment does not support a whole lot of connection cycles, but we are still talking about hundreds of transceiver swaps.
As for the transceivers themselves I strongly recommend dust caps. (Same applies for the LC connectors on the fibers). And do not assume they are clean when you buy them. I have seen dirty connectors on brand new cables, even with expensive brands. Always clean and check before you connect.
Cleaning transceivers is a different story. It MIGHT make sense but depends on the optics in use. There are usually 2 elements called TOSA and ROSA for transmitting and receiving. Some of them have accessable lenses you can clean with the right cleaning equipment (please no compressed air!) while others have a smaller hole in the middle and cleaning attempts will only make things worse. Unfortunately most transceiver vendors won't be able to tell you what they have in their transceivers, as most of them are OEM products anyway. The best way to check is using an electronic fiber scope.
Or - which works most of the time - you take the less professional approach and just take the chances and give it a try. Will also work for 80%+ ;-)
But I would not recommend this for dusty environments where I have seen a nearly 100% failure rate on optical connections when leaving them open for some time.
Hope this helps.
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
Hellas
31
31
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
Markus MayrlMarkus Mayrl
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58692%2fdo-i-need-to-protect-sfp-ports-and-optics-from-dust-contaminants-if-so-how%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
A lot depends on how dusty your environment is. For my industrial work, I often tape up unused ether and SFP module sockets with masking tape; in nice filtered machine rooms I don't. But keep the optical paths covered, I use masking tape again, as I always lose the rubber stoppers. I keep the SFP modules in place, otherwise I lose those too.
– jonathanjo
Apr 24 at 12:23
2
In sort: YES. No matter how clean you think the place is, there will be dust. (or as in our last office, some jack*** will cut a hole through the wall, and leave it. they actually cut several, ran conduit, and reapplied fire guard -- in an ACTIVE DATA CENTER!)
– Ricky Beam
Apr 24 at 16:58
Sorry for the multi-part question, but they're all closely related and about unused SFP/ports.
– Criggie
Apr 24 at 22:14