Can muons decay into quarks?Difference in decay for muon and anti muonHow does a structureless particle decay?Quark mixing vs neutrino mixing, mass eigenstates, weak states and detectionWhy is it not possible to measure the individual neutrino mass from $beta-$decay?About the reason why the change of a muon into an electron plus a photon is not seenAtmospheric neutrino oscillationsCan physical processes be deemed possible or impossible with Standard Model vertices alone?Light neutrino number from the invisible decay width of $Z$ boson, and precluding heavy neutrinos as dark matter candidateMuon neutrino interacting with nucleon's quarks
Is there any optimization for thread safety in for loop of Java?
What calendar would the Saturn nation use?
What does the copyright in a dissertation protect exactly?
What chord could the notes 'F A♭ E♭' form?
What's the role of the Receiver/Transmitter in Avengers Endgame?
Can you just subtract the challenge rating of friendly NPCs?
An adjective or a noun to describe a very small apartment / house etc
Concatenate all values of the same XML element using XPath/XQuery
How to get the decimal part of a number in apex
HTML folder located within IOS Image file?
How does "politician" work as a job/career?
How to make a kid's bike easier to pedal
What's the 2-minute timer on mobile Deutsche Bahn tickets?
How could a humanoid creature completely form within the span of 24 hours?
While drilling into kitchen wall, hit a wire - any advice?
Test whether a string is in a list with variable
Select list elements based on other list
My C Drive is full without reason
My large rocket is still flipping over
Crime rates in a post-scarcity economy
Why did Dr. Strange keep looking into the future after the snap?
Why was Gemini VIII terminated after recovering from the OAMS thruster failure?
If an attacker targets a creature with the Sanctuary spell cast on them, but fails the Wisdom save, can they choose not to attack anyone else?
When does WordPress.org notify sites of new version?
Can muons decay into quarks?
Difference in decay for muon and anti muonHow does a structureless particle decay?Quark mixing vs neutrino mixing, mass eigenstates, weak states and detectionWhy is it not possible to measure the individual neutrino mass from $beta-$decay?About the reason why the change of a muon into an electron plus a photon is not seenAtmospheric neutrino oscillationsCan physical processes be deemed possible or impossible with Standard Model vertices alone?Light neutrino number from the invisible decay width of $Z$ boson, and precluding heavy neutrinos as dark matter candidateMuon neutrino interacting with nucleon's quarks
$begingroup$
Muon decays are almost always written as $$mu^- rightarrow e^-+ barnu_e +nu_mu.$$
The reason given on wikipedia is that one of the product neutrinos of muon decay must be a muon-type neutrino and the other an electron-type antineutrino due to conservation of leptonic family numbers.
Does this mean that muons can't decay into quarks plus a muon-type neutrino, which can be lighter particles than the muons itself and with electric charge added up to -1? If they can't, why?
particle-physics conservation-laws standard-model quarks leptons
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Muon decays are almost always written as $$mu^- rightarrow e^-+ barnu_e +nu_mu.$$
The reason given on wikipedia is that one of the product neutrinos of muon decay must be a muon-type neutrino and the other an electron-type antineutrino due to conservation of leptonic family numbers.
Does this mean that muons can't decay into quarks plus a muon-type neutrino, which can be lighter particles than the muons itself and with electric charge added up to -1? If they can't, why?
particle-physics conservation-laws standard-model quarks leptons
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Muon decays are almost always written as $$mu^- rightarrow e^-+ barnu_e +nu_mu.$$
The reason given on wikipedia is that one of the product neutrinos of muon decay must be a muon-type neutrino and the other an electron-type antineutrino due to conservation of leptonic family numbers.
Does this mean that muons can't decay into quarks plus a muon-type neutrino, which can be lighter particles than the muons itself and with electric charge added up to -1? If they can't, why?
particle-physics conservation-laws standard-model quarks leptons
$endgroup$
Muon decays are almost always written as $$mu^- rightarrow e^-+ barnu_e +nu_mu.$$
The reason given on wikipedia is that one of the product neutrinos of muon decay must be a muon-type neutrino and the other an electron-type antineutrino due to conservation of leptonic family numbers.
Does this mean that muons can't decay into quarks plus a muon-type neutrino, which can be lighter particles than the muons itself and with electric charge added up to -1? If they can't, why?
particle-physics conservation-laws standard-model quarks leptons
particle-physics conservation-laws standard-model quarks leptons
edited May 3 at 13:05
Elio Fabri
4,0471214
4,0471214
asked May 3 at 12:31
TaeNyFanTaeNyFan
64117
64117
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, muons can't decay into quarks because quarks are confined; the final product cannot be quarks, but rather composite particles made of quarks, such as mesons and baryons. The lightest mesons are the pions, which are already heavier than the muon, so any such decay is forbidden by energy conservation.
On the other hand, the extremely heavy tau can and does decay to light mesons quite often, as you can see in the PDG entry.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Doesn't confinement of quarks just mean that if a muon decayed into two quarks that flew off in opposite directions, hadronization occurs and jets of hadrons are formed, as in particle colliders? Do you mean that the energy used for creation of new quarks in hadronization also has to come from the muon's mass energy?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:49
1
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan That's simply not possible, as there isn't even enough energy to form one hadron, let alone a jet.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 12:51
$begingroup$
Just to be sure, that means that energy for hadronization has to come from the muon too?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:54
3
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan If you just have nothing but a muon around and then it decays, then yes.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 13:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe my answer is non-mainstream physics (though I'm sure it's gonna be mainstream one day) and I give the answer nonetheless. It cán be enlightening, who knows?
As might be known, I'm a big fan of the Rishon Model, concocted up by the Israelian physicist Haïm Harari.
He sees quarks and leptons as composite particles made up out of just two (!) truly elementary particles, the T-rishon, and the V-rishon.
The muon is built up out of three anti-T-rishons (which each have an electric charge $-frac 1 3$): $bar T bar T bar T$.
Now if a $VVV$, a neutrino, in this case, a muon neutrino $nu_mu^-$ (each V-rishon carries an electric charge $0$) and a $bar V bar V bar V$ appear as a virtual particle pair, the rishons can rearrange themselves (a $bar T$ and a $bar V$ interchange) into an anti-up-quark, $bar u$ ($bar T bar T bar V$), a down quark, $d$ ($bar T bar V bar V$), and an muon neutrino ($VVV$). The two quarks form a meson, so we are left with a meson ($pi^-$) and a muon-neutrino. Check that the number of $bar T$'s, $V$'s, and $bar V$'s are the same on both sides:
$$bar Tbar Tbar T+ VVV+ bar V bar Vbar Vrightarrow bar Tbar Tbar V+bar Tbar Vbar V+VVV,$$
which reads in the standard formulation as:
$$mu^-rightarrowbar u +d+nu_mu.$$
However, as knzhou wrote, the energy of a muon is too small to produce a pion and a muon-neutrino.
But if we take the third generation tau particle (which, according to the model, is also built up out of three anti-T-rishons, $bar T bar T bar T$) this tau will be heavy enough to produce a pion and an anti-tau neutrino by the mechanism described above.
Look at this picture, the standard Feynman diagram of tau decay:

As can be seen, the decay is induced by the weak interaction, which in the Rishon Model is considered as a residue force, just as the "old" strong force (conveyed by massive pions, just as the $W^+/-$ and $Z^0$ are massive) is now considered as a residue force of the color force (the force of which the weak interaction is a residue is called the hyper-color force). The $W^-$ is in the Rishon Model built up out of three anti-T-rishons and three anti-V-rishons: $bar T bar Tbar T bar V bar V bar V$ ($Z^0$ is built up out of three $V$'s and three $bar V$'s: $bar V bar V bar V VVV$ where I referred to). So you can just as well say that the tau ($bar T bar T bar T$) becomes part of a virtual $Z^0$ ($bar V bar V bar V VVV$) after which the shown outgoing particles can be produced.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477603%2fcan-muons-decay-into-quarks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, muons can't decay into quarks because quarks are confined; the final product cannot be quarks, but rather composite particles made of quarks, such as mesons and baryons. The lightest mesons are the pions, which are already heavier than the muon, so any such decay is forbidden by energy conservation.
On the other hand, the extremely heavy tau can and does decay to light mesons quite often, as you can see in the PDG entry.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Doesn't confinement of quarks just mean that if a muon decayed into two quarks that flew off in opposite directions, hadronization occurs and jets of hadrons are formed, as in particle colliders? Do you mean that the energy used for creation of new quarks in hadronization also has to come from the muon's mass energy?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:49
1
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan That's simply not possible, as there isn't even enough energy to form one hadron, let alone a jet.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 12:51
$begingroup$
Just to be sure, that means that energy for hadronization has to come from the muon too?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:54
3
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan If you just have nothing but a muon around and then it decays, then yes.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 13:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, muons can't decay into quarks because quarks are confined; the final product cannot be quarks, but rather composite particles made of quarks, such as mesons and baryons. The lightest mesons are the pions, which are already heavier than the muon, so any such decay is forbidden by energy conservation.
On the other hand, the extremely heavy tau can and does decay to light mesons quite often, as you can see in the PDG entry.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Doesn't confinement of quarks just mean that if a muon decayed into two quarks that flew off in opposite directions, hadronization occurs and jets of hadrons are formed, as in particle colliders? Do you mean that the energy used for creation of new quarks in hadronization also has to come from the muon's mass energy?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:49
1
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan That's simply not possible, as there isn't even enough energy to form one hadron, let alone a jet.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 12:51
$begingroup$
Just to be sure, that means that energy for hadronization has to come from the muon too?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:54
3
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan If you just have nothing but a muon around and then it decays, then yes.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 13:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, muons can't decay into quarks because quarks are confined; the final product cannot be quarks, but rather composite particles made of quarks, such as mesons and baryons. The lightest mesons are the pions, which are already heavier than the muon, so any such decay is forbidden by energy conservation.
On the other hand, the extremely heavy tau can and does decay to light mesons quite often, as you can see in the PDG entry.
$endgroup$
No, muons can't decay into quarks because quarks are confined; the final product cannot be quarks, but rather composite particles made of quarks, such as mesons and baryons. The lightest mesons are the pions, which are already heavier than the muon, so any such decay is forbidden by energy conservation.
On the other hand, the extremely heavy tau can and does decay to light mesons quite often, as you can see in the PDG entry.
answered May 3 at 12:37
knzhouknzhou
48.8k12134239
48.8k12134239
$begingroup$
Doesn't confinement of quarks just mean that if a muon decayed into two quarks that flew off in opposite directions, hadronization occurs and jets of hadrons are formed, as in particle colliders? Do you mean that the energy used for creation of new quarks in hadronization also has to come from the muon's mass energy?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:49
1
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan That's simply not possible, as there isn't even enough energy to form one hadron, let alone a jet.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 12:51
$begingroup$
Just to be sure, that means that energy for hadronization has to come from the muon too?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:54
3
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan If you just have nothing but a muon around and then it decays, then yes.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 13:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Doesn't confinement of quarks just mean that if a muon decayed into two quarks that flew off in opposite directions, hadronization occurs and jets of hadrons are formed, as in particle colliders? Do you mean that the energy used for creation of new quarks in hadronization also has to come from the muon's mass energy?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:49
1
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan That's simply not possible, as there isn't even enough energy to form one hadron, let alone a jet.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 12:51
$begingroup$
Just to be sure, that means that energy for hadronization has to come from the muon too?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:54
3
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan If you just have nothing but a muon around and then it decays, then yes.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 13:45
$begingroup$
Doesn't confinement of quarks just mean that if a muon decayed into two quarks that flew off in opposite directions, hadronization occurs and jets of hadrons are formed, as in particle colliders? Do you mean that the energy used for creation of new quarks in hadronization also has to come from the muon's mass energy?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:49
$begingroup$
Doesn't confinement of quarks just mean that if a muon decayed into two quarks that flew off in opposite directions, hadronization occurs and jets of hadrons are formed, as in particle colliders? Do you mean that the energy used for creation of new quarks in hadronization also has to come from the muon's mass energy?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:49
1
1
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan That's simply not possible, as there isn't even enough energy to form one hadron, let alone a jet.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 12:51
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan That's simply not possible, as there isn't even enough energy to form one hadron, let alone a jet.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 12:51
$begingroup$
Just to be sure, that means that energy for hadronization has to come from the muon too?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:54
$begingroup$
Just to be sure, that means that energy for hadronization has to come from the muon too?
$endgroup$
– TaeNyFan
May 3 at 12:54
3
3
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan If you just have nothing but a muon around and then it decays, then yes.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 13:45
$begingroup$
@TaeNyFan If you just have nothing but a muon around and then it decays, then yes.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
May 3 at 13:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe my answer is non-mainstream physics (though I'm sure it's gonna be mainstream one day) and I give the answer nonetheless. It cán be enlightening, who knows?
As might be known, I'm a big fan of the Rishon Model, concocted up by the Israelian physicist Haïm Harari.
He sees quarks and leptons as composite particles made up out of just two (!) truly elementary particles, the T-rishon, and the V-rishon.
The muon is built up out of three anti-T-rishons (which each have an electric charge $-frac 1 3$): $bar T bar T bar T$.
Now if a $VVV$, a neutrino, in this case, a muon neutrino $nu_mu^-$ (each V-rishon carries an electric charge $0$) and a $bar V bar V bar V$ appear as a virtual particle pair, the rishons can rearrange themselves (a $bar T$ and a $bar V$ interchange) into an anti-up-quark, $bar u$ ($bar T bar T bar V$), a down quark, $d$ ($bar T bar V bar V$), and an muon neutrino ($VVV$). The two quarks form a meson, so we are left with a meson ($pi^-$) and a muon-neutrino. Check that the number of $bar T$'s, $V$'s, and $bar V$'s are the same on both sides:
$$bar Tbar Tbar T+ VVV+ bar V bar Vbar Vrightarrow bar Tbar Tbar V+bar Tbar Vbar V+VVV,$$
which reads in the standard formulation as:
$$mu^-rightarrowbar u +d+nu_mu.$$
However, as knzhou wrote, the energy of a muon is too small to produce a pion and a muon-neutrino.
But if we take the third generation tau particle (which, according to the model, is also built up out of three anti-T-rishons, $bar T bar T bar T$) this tau will be heavy enough to produce a pion and an anti-tau neutrino by the mechanism described above.
Look at this picture, the standard Feynman diagram of tau decay:

As can be seen, the decay is induced by the weak interaction, which in the Rishon Model is considered as a residue force, just as the "old" strong force (conveyed by massive pions, just as the $W^+/-$ and $Z^0$ are massive) is now considered as a residue force of the color force (the force of which the weak interaction is a residue is called the hyper-color force). The $W^-$ is in the Rishon Model built up out of three anti-T-rishons and three anti-V-rishons: $bar T bar Tbar T bar V bar V bar V$ ($Z^0$ is built up out of three $V$'s and three $bar V$'s: $bar V bar V bar V VVV$ where I referred to). So you can just as well say that the tau ($bar T bar T bar T$) becomes part of a virtual $Z^0$ ($bar V bar V bar V VVV$) after which the shown outgoing particles can be produced.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe my answer is non-mainstream physics (though I'm sure it's gonna be mainstream one day) and I give the answer nonetheless. It cán be enlightening, who knows?
As might be known, I'm a big fan of the Rishon Model, concocted up by the Israelian physicist Haïm Harari.
He sees quarks and leptons as composite particles made up out of just two (!) truly elementary particles, the T-rishon, and the V-rishon.
The muon is built up out of three anti-T-rishons (which each have an electric charge $-frac 1 3$): $bar T bar T bar T$.
Now if a $VVV$, a neutrino, in this case, a muon neutrino $nu_mu^-$ (each V-rishon carries an electric charge $0$) and a $bar V bar V bar V$ appear as a virtual particle pair, the rishons can rearrange themselves (a $bar T$ and a $bar V$ interchange) into an anti-up-quark, $bar u$ ($bar T bar T bar V$), a down quark, $d$ ($bar T bar V bar V$), and an muon neutrino ($VVV$). The two quarks form a meson, so we are left with a meson ($pi^-$) and a muon-neutrino. Check that the number of $bar T$'s, $V$'s, and $bar V$'s are the same on both sides:
$$bar Tbar Tbar T+ VVV+ bar V bar Vbar Vrightarrow bar Tbar Tbar V+bar Tbar Vbar V+VVV,$$
which reads in the standard formulation as:
$$mu^-rightarrowbar u +d+nu_mu.$$
However, as knzhou wrote, the energy of a muon is too small to produce a pion and a muon-neutrino.
But if we take the third generation tau particle (which, according to the model, is also built up out of three anti-T-rishons, $bar T bar T bar T$) this tau will be heavy enough to produce a pion and an anti-tau neutrino by the mechanism described above.
Look at this picture, the standard Feynman diagram of tau decay:

As can be seen, the decay is induced by the weak interaction, which in the Rishon Model is considered as a residue force, just as the "old" strong force (conveyed by massive pions, just as the $W^+/-$ and $Z^0$ are massive) is now considered as a residue force of the color force (the force of which the weak interaction is a residue is called the hyper-color force). The $W^-$ is in the Rishon Model built up out of three anti-T-rishons and three anti-V-rishons: $bar T bar Tbar T bar V bar V bar V$ ($Z^0$ is built up out of three $V$'s and three $bar V$'s: $bar V bar V bar V VVV$ where I referred to). So you can just as well say that the tau ($bar T bar T bar T$) becomes part of a virtual $Z^0$ ($bar V bar V bar V VVV$) after which the shown outgoing particles can be produced.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe my answer is non-mainstream physics (though I'm sure it's gonna be mainstream one day) and I give the answer nonetheless. It cán be enlightening, who knows?
As might be known, I'm a big fan of the Rishon Model, concocted up by the Israelian physicist Haïm Harari.
He sees quarks and leptons as composite particles made up out of just two (!) truly elementary particles, the T-rishon, and the V-rishon.
The muon is built up out of three anti-T-rishons (which each have an electric charge $-frac 1 3$): $bar T bar T bar T$.
Now if a $VVV$, a neutrino, in this case, a muon neutrino $nu_mu^-$ (each V-rishon carries an electric charge $0$) and a $bar V bar V bar V$ appear as a virtual particle pair, the rishons can rearrange themselves (a $bar T$ and a $bar V$ interchange) into an anti-up-quark, $bar u$ ($bar T bar T bar V$), a down quark, $d$ ($bar T bar V bar V$), and an muon neutrino ($VVV$). The two quarks form a meson, so we are left with a meson ($pi^-$) and a muon-neutrino. Check that the number of $bar T$'s, $V$'s, and $bar V$'s are the same on both sides:
$$bar Tbar Tbar T+ VVV+ bar V bar Vbar Vrightarrow bar Tbar Tbar V+bar Tbar Vbar V+VVV,$$
which reads in the standard formulation as:
$$mu^-rightarrowbar u +d+nu_mu.$$
However, as knzhou wrote, the energy of a muon is too small to produce a pion and a muon-neutrino.
But if we take the third generation tau particle (which, according to the model, is also built up out of three anti-T-rishons, $bar T bar T bar T$) this tau will be heavy enough to produce a pion and an anti-tau neutrino by the mechanism described above.
Look at this picture, the standard Feynman diagram of tau decay:

As can be seen, the decay is induced by the weak interaction, which in the Rishon Model is considered as a residue force, just as the "old" strong force (conveyed by massive pions, just as the $W^+/-$ and $Z^0$ are massive) is now considered as a residue force of the color force (the force of which the weak interaction is a residue is called the hyper-color force). The $W^-$ is in the Rishon Model built up out of three anti-T-rishons and three anti-V-rishons: $bar T bar Tbar T bar V bar V bar V$ ($Z^0$ is built up out of three $V$'s and three $bar V$'s: $bar V bar V bar V VVV$ where I referred to). So you can just as well say that the tau ($bar T bar T bar T$) becomes part of a virtual $Z^0$ ($bar V bar V bar V VVV$) after which the shown outgoing particles can be produced.
$endgroup$
Maybe my answer is non-mainstream physics (though I'm sure it's gonna be mainstream one day) and I give the answer nonetheless. It cán be enlightening, who knows?
As might be known, I'm a big fan of the Rishon Model, concocted up by the Israelian physicist Haïm Harari.
He sees quarks and leptons as composite particles made up out of just two (!) truly elementary particles, the T-rishon, and the V-rishon.
The muon is built up out of three anti-T-rishons (which each have an electric charge $-frac 1 3$): $bar T bar T bar T$.
Now if a $VVV$, a neutrino, in this case, a muon neutrino $nu_mu^-$ (each V-rishon carries an electric charge $0$) and a $bar V bar V bar V$ appear as a virtual particle pair, the rishons can rearrange themselves (a $bar T$ and a $bar V$ interchange) into an anti-up-quark, $bar u$ ($bar T bar T bar V$), a down quark, $d$ ($bar T bar V bar V$), and an muon neutrino ($VVV$). The two quarks form a meson, so we are left with a meson ($pi^-$) and a muon-neutrino. Check that the number of $bar T$'s, $V$'s, and $bar V$'s are the same on both sides:
$$bar Tbar Tbar T+ VVV+ bar V bar Vbar Vrightarrow bar Tbar Tbar V+bar Tbar Vbar V+VVV,$$
which reads in the standard formulation as:
$$mu^-rightarrowbar u +d+nu_mu.$$
However, as knzhou wrote, the energy of a muon is too small to produce a pion and a muon-neutrino.
But if we take the third generation tau particle (which, according to the model, is also built up out of three anti-T-rishons, $bar T bar T bar T$) this tau will be heavy enough to produce a pion and an anti-tau neutrino by the mechanism described above.
Look at this picture, the standard Feynman diagram of tau decay:

As can be seen, the decay is induced by the weak interaction, which in the Rishon Model is considered as a residue force, just as the "old" strong force (conveyed by massive pions, just as the $W^+/-$ and $Z^0$ are massive) is now considered as a residue force of the color force (the force of which the weak interaction is a residue is called the hyper-color force). The $W^-$ is in the Rishon Model built up out of three anti-T-rishons and three anti-V-rishons: $bar T bar Tbar T bar V bar V bar V$ ($Z^0$ is built up out of three $V$'s and three $bar V$'s: $bar V bar V bar V VVV$ where I referred to). So you can just as well say that the tau ($bar T bar T bar T$) becomes part of a virtual $Z^0$ ($bar V bar V bar V VVV$) after which the shown outgoing particles can be produced.
edited May 3 at 21:13
answered May 3 at 14:23
descheleschilderdescheleschilder
4,37421445
4,37421445
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477603%2fcan-muons-decay-into-quarks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown