resolution bandwidthIs my understanding correct in selecting ADC resolution? (Noise analysis)Delta Sigma Converters: ResolutionNoise Bandwidth of multichannel systemHow to calculate opamp input noise for DC input?Quantifying white noise with a spectrum analyzerAmplitude of PSD on spectrum analyzer varies strongly with RBWMeasuring PSR of a current reference chipMaximum Allowable Noise of ADC Input SignalWill noise floor dominate the ADC resolution?External signal noise versus ADC resolution
A steel cutting sword?
Is there some hidden joke behind the "it's never lupus" running gag in House?
Why do Windows registry hives appear empty?
Crossing US border with music files I'm legally allowed to possess
Compactness of finite sets
Why colon to denote that a value belongs to a type?
What is quasi-aromaticity?
My employer faked my resume to acquire projects
Can I install both XCode & Android Studio on MacBook Air with only 8 GB of Ram
Employer demanding to see degree after poor code review
What is the largest (size) solid object ever dropped from an airplane to impact the ground in freefall?
Find limit in use of integrals
I think I may have violated academic integrity last year - what should I do?
What are these arcade games in Ghostbusters 1984?
Statue View: 2, 3, 5, 7
Is it true that cut time means "play twice as fast as written"?
Should I disclose a colleague's illness (that I should not know) when others badmouth him
How strong are Wi-Fi signals?
Is "cool" appropriate or offensive to use in IMs?
Using credit/debit card details vs swiping a card in a payment (credit card) terminal
Is real public IP Address hidden when using a system wide proxy in Windows 10?
What are the real benefits of using Salesforce DX?
Cipher Block Chaining - How do you change the plaintext of all blocks?
What is the object moving across the ceiling in this stock footage?
resolution bandwidth
Is my understanding correct in selecting ADC resolution? (Noise analysis)Delta Sigma Converters: ResolutionNoise Bandwidth of multichannel systemHow to calculate opamp input noise for DC input?Quantifying white noise with a spectrum analyzerAmplitude of PSD on spectrum analyzer varies strongly with RBWMeasuring PSR of a current reference chipMaximum Allowable Noise of ADC Input SignalWill noise floor dominate the ADC resolution?External signal noise versus ADC resolution
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I have the following trivial question:
I have acquired a noise spectrum with a resolution bandwidth of $124mathrmHz$.
I would like to convert it to $mathrmV/sqrtHz$. Shall I simply multiply or divide the signal by $sqrt124$??
Regards
noise spectrum-analyzer resolution
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have the following trivial question:
I have acquired a noise spectrum with a resolution bandwidth of $124mathrmHz$.
I would like to convert it to $mathrmV/sqrtHz$. Shall I simply multiply or divide the signal by $sqrt124$??
Regards
noise spectrum-analyzer resolution
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The spectral shape determines everything, for which you have not defined
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
May 21 at 0:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have the following trivial question:
I have acquired a noise spectrum with a resolution bandwidth of $124mathrmHz$.
I would like to convert it to $mathrmV/sqrtHz$. Shall I simply multiply or divide the signal by $sqrt124$??
Regards
noise spectrum-analyzer resolution
New contributor
$endgroup$
I have the following trivial question:
I have acquired a noise spectrum with a resolution bandwidth of $124mathrmHz$.
I would like to convert it to $mathrmV/sqrtHz$. Shall I simply multiply or divide the signal by $sqrt124$??
Regards
noise spectrum-analyzer resolution
noise spectrum-analyzer resolution
New contributor
New contributor
edited May 20 at 18:15
Daniele Tampieri
1,2742717
1,2742717
New contributor
asked May 20 at 11:26
user222401user222401
311
311
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
The spectral shape determines everything, for which you have not defined
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
May 21 at 0:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The spectral shape determines everything, for which you have not defined
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
May 21 at 0:16
$begingroup$
The spectral shape determines everything, for which you have not defined
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
May 21 at 0:16
$begingroup$
The spectral shape determines everything, for which you have not defined
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
May 21 at 0:16
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes: however this requires a few words of explanation. Noise voltage has not the usual meaning since its exact value is obviously not exactly known. What can be measured and has a well defined and predictable behavior is the noise power adsorbed by a well defined load $Z_L$, in a frequency bandwidth $B$ centered around a frequency $f_o$, which has the following form
$$
P(B,f_o)=fraclangle V_n^2(f_o)rangleZ_L=frac1Z_Lintlimits_f_o-B/2^f_o+B/2S(f)mathrmdf
$$
i.e. it is the power spectral density $S(f)$ which gives the expected value. Since you have acquired a noise spectrum with a resolution bandwidth of $B=124mathrmHz$ the measured value you have acquired is precisely
$$
langle V_n^2(f_o)rangle=;intlimits_f_o-B/2^f_o+B/2S(f)mathrmdfimplies S(f)simeq fraclangle V_n^2(f)rangleB
$$
However, instead of $S(f)$ it is customary preferred to give the noise voltage density $v_n(f)$
$$
v_n(f)=sqrtS(f)=fraclangle V_n^2(f)rangle^frac12sqrtB
$$
In sum, if your spectrum analyzer gives you already a power spectrum in which each spectral line is expressed as a voltage, dividing it by the square root of its resolution bandwidth gives you the sought for noise voltage density.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Shouldn’t the lower end of the integral be $$f_0-B/2$$?
$endgroup$
– Jonas Schäfer
May 20 at 16:28
2
$begingroup$
@JonasSchäfer Yes, thank you! I'll immediately correct the typo.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
May 20 at 16:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you had a noise value of N volts per $sqrtHz$ then that would be a noise voltage of $Ncdot sqrt124$ volts in your 124 Hz bandwidth. Reversing the operation means dividing by $sqrt124$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Some great background to noise measurement in different bandwidths can be found in:
Agilent application note 1303 Agilent Spectrum Analyzer Measurements and Noise:
Measuring Noise and Noise-like Digital Communications Signals with a Spectrum Analyzer
Found all over the web, here is one copy.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
user222401 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f439414%2fresolution-bandwidth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes: however this requires a few words of explanation. Noise voltage has not the usual meaning since its exact value is obviously not exactly known. What can be measured and has a well defined and predictable behavior is the noise power adsorbed by a well defined load $Z_L$, in a frequency bandwidth $B$ centered around a frequency $f_o$, which has the following form
$$
P(B,f_o)=fraclangle V_n^2(f_o)rangleZ_L=frac1Z_Lintlimits_f_o-B/2^f_o+B/2S(f)mathrmdf
$$
i.e. it is the power spectral density $S(f)$ which gives the expected value. Since you have acquired a noise spectrum with a resolution bandwidth of $B=124mathrmHz$ the measured value you have acquired is precisely
$$
langle V_n^2(f_o)rangle=;intlimits_f_o-B/2^f_o+B/2S(f)mathrmdfimplies S(f)simeq fraclangle V_n^2(f)rangleB
$$
However, instead of $S(f)$ it is customary preferred to give the noise voltage density $v_n(f)$
$$
v_n(f)=sqrtS(f)=fraclangle V_n^2(f)rangle^frac12sqrtB
$$
In sum, if your spectrum analyzer gives you already a power spectrum in which each spectral line is expressed as a voltage, dividing it by the square root of its resolution bandwidth gives you the sought for noise voltage density.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Shouldn’t the lower end of the integral be $$f_0-B/2$$?
$endgroup$
– Jonas Schäfer
May 20 at 16:28
2
$begingroup$
@JonasSchäfer Yes, thank you! I'll immediately correct the typo.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
May 20 at 16:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes: however this requires a few words of explanation. Noise voltage has not the usual meaning since its exact value is obviously not exactly known. What can be measured and has a well defined and predictable behavior is the noise power adsorbed by a well defined load $Z_L$, in a frequency bandwidth $B$ centered around a frequency $f_o$, which has the following form
$$
P(B,f_o)=fraclangle V_n^2(f_o)rangleZ_L=frac1Z_Lintlimits_f_o-B/2^f_o+B/2S(f)mathrmdf
$$
i.e. it is the power spectral density $S(f)$ which gives the expected value. Since you have acquired a noise spectrum with a resolution bandwidth of $B=124mathrmHz$ the measured value you have acquired is precisely
$$
langle V_n^2(f_o)rangle=;intlimits_f_o-B/2^f_o+B/2S(f)mathrmdfimplies S(f)simeq fraclangle V_n^2(f)rangleB
$$
However, instead of $S(f)$ it is customary preferred to give the noise voltage density $v_n(f)$
$$
v_n(f)=sqrtS(f)=fraclangle V_n^2(f)rangle^frac12sqrtB
$$
In sum, if your spectrum analyzer gives you already a power spectrum in which each spectral line is expressed as a voltage, dividing it by the square root of its resolution bandwidth gives you the sought for noise voltage density.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Shouldn’t the lower end of the integral be $$f_0-B/2$$?
$endgroup$
– Jonas Schäfer
May 20 at 16:28
2
$begingroup$
@JonasSchäfer Yes, thank you! I'll immediately correct the typo.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
May 20 at 16:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes: however this requires a few words of explanation. Noise voltage has not the usual meaning since its exact value is obviously not exactly known. What can be measured and has a well defined and predictable behavior is the noise power adsorbed by a well defined load $Z_L$, in a frequency bandwidth $B$ centered around a frequency $f_o$, which has the following form
$$
P(B,f_o)=fraclangle V_n^2(f_o)rangleZ_L=frac1Z_Lintlimits_f_o-B/2^f_o+B/2S(f)mathrmdf
$$
i.e. it is the power spectral density $S(f)$ which gives the expected value. Since you have acquired a noise spectrum with a resolution bandwidth of $B=124mathrmHz$ the measured value you have acquired is precisely
$$
langle V_n^2(f_o)rangle=;intlimits_f_o-B/2^f_o+B/2S(f)mathrmdfimplies S(f)simeq fraclangle V_n^2(f)rangleB
$$
However, instead of $S(f)$ it is customary preferred to give the noise voltage density $v_n(f)$
$$
v_n(f)=sqrtS(f)=fraclangle V_n^2(f)rangle^frac12sqrtB
$$
In sum, if your spectrum analyzer gives you already a power spectrum in which each spectral line is expressed as a voltage, dividing it by the square root of its resolution bandwidth gives you the sought for noise voltage density.
$endgroup$
Yes: however this requires a few words of explanation. Noise voltage has not the usual meaning since its exact value is obviously not exactly known. What can be measured and has a well defined and predictable behavior is the noise power adsorbed by a well defined load $Z_L$, in a frequency bandwidth $B$ centered around a frequency $f_o$, which has the following form
$$
P(B,f_o)=fraclangle V_n^2(f_o)rangleZ_L=frac1Z_Lintlimits_f_o-B/2^f_o+B/2S(f)mathrmdf
$$
i.e. it is the power spectral density $S(f)$ which gives the expected value. Since you have acquired a noise spectrum with a resolution bandwidth of $B=124mathrmHz$ the measured value you have acquired is precisely
$$
langle V_n^2(f_o)rangle=;intlimits_f_o-B/2^f_o+B/2S(f)mathrmdfimplies S(f)simeq fraclangle V_n^2(f)rangleB
$$
However, instead of $S(f)$ it is customary preferred to give the noise voltage density $v_n(f)$
$$
v_n(f)=sqrtS(f)=fraclangle V_n^2(f)rangle^frac12sqrtB
$$
In sum, if your spectrum analyzer gives you already a power spectrum in which each spectral line is expressed as a voltage, dividing it by the square root of its resolution bandwidth gives you the sought for noise voltage density.
edited May 21 at 12:10
answered May 20 at 13:12
Daniele TampieriDaniele Tampieri
1,2742717
1,2742717
2
$begingroup$
Shouldn’t the lower end of the integral be $$f_0-B/2$$?
$endgroup$
– Jonas Schäfer
May 20 at 16:28
2
$begingroup$
@JonasSchäfer Yes, thank you! I'll immediately correct the typo.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
May 20 at 16:29
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Shouldn’t the lower end of the integral be $$f_0-B/2$$?
$endgroup$
– Jonas Schäfer
May 20 at 16:28
2
$begingroup$
@JonasSchäfer Yes, thank you! I'll immediately correct the typo.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
May 20 at 16:29
2
2
$begingroup$
Shouldn’t the lower end of the integral be $$f_0-B/2$$?
$endgroup$
– Jonas Schäfer
May 20 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Shouldn’t the lower end of the integral be $$f_0-B/2$$?
$endgroup$
– Jonas Schäfer
May 20 at 16:28
2
2
$begingroup$
@JonasSchäfer Yes, thank you! I'll immediately correct the typo.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
May 20 at 16:29
$begingroup$
@JonasSchäfer Yes, thank you! I'll immediately correct the typo.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
May 20 at 16:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you had a noise value of N volts per $sqrtHz$ then that would be a noise voltage of $Ncdot sqrt124$ volts in your 124 Hz bandwidth. Reversing the operation means dividing by $sqrt124$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you had a noise value of N volts per $sqrtHz$ then that would be a noise voltage of $Ncdot sqrt124$ volts in your 124 Hz bandwidth. Reversing the operation means dividing by $sqrt124$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you had a noise value of N volts per $sqrtHz$ then that would be a noise voltage of $Ncdot sqrt124$ volts in your 124 Hz bandwidth. Reversing the operation means dividing by $sqrt124$.
$endgroup$
If you had a noise value of N volts per $sqrtHz$ then that would be a noise voltage of $Ncdot sqrt124$ volts in your 124 Hz bandwidth. Reversing the operation means dividing by $sqrt124$.
edited May 20 at 12:13
answered May 20 at 12:06
Andy akaAndy aka
246k11189430
246k11189430
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Some great background to noise measurement in different bandwidths can be found in:
Agilent application note 1303 Agilent Spectrum Analyzer Measurements and Noise:
Measuring Noise and Noise-like Digital Communications Signals with a Spectrum Analyzer
Found all over the web, here is one copy.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Some great background to noise measurement in different bandwidths can be found in:
Agilent application note 1303 Agilent Spectrum Analyzer Measurements and Noise:
Measuring Noise and Noise-like Digital Communications Signals with a Spectrum Analyzer
Found all over the web, here is one copy.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Some great background to noise measurement in different bandwidths can be found in:
Agilent application note 1303 Agilent Spectrum Analyzer Measurements and Noise:
Measuring Noise and Noise-like Digital Communications Signals with a Spectrum Analyzer
Found all over the web, here is one copy.
$endgroup$
Some great background to noise measurement in different bandwidths can be found in:
Agilent application note 1303 Agilent Spectrum Analyzer Measurements and Noise:
Measuring Noise and Noise-like Digital Communications Signals with a Spectrum Analyzer
Found all over the web, here is one copy.
answered May 20 at 12:49
tomnexustomnexus
5,46511029
5,46511029
add a comment |
add a comment |
user222401 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user222401 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user222401 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user222401 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f439414%2fresolution-bandwidth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The spectral shape determines everything, for which you have not defined
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
May 21 at 0:16