Simple Derivative Proof? [on hold]Proof of derivative of invertible functionHow to make a piecewise function differentiable?The Differentiability of a Piecewise FunctionProof of Lipschitz continuousA question about existence of derivative of function at ZeroQuestion about derivative proof :)Derivative of a power functionProperties of the mean value theorem derivativeIs a function strictly increasing if its derivative is positive at all point but critical points?Limit definition of a derivative proof?
Why doesn't a particle exert force on itself?
My parents are Afghan
How to start your Starctaft II games vs AI immediatly?
How would an instant or sorcery with an effect that targets work with Feather?
Is it a good idea to copy a trader when investing?
Light Switch Neutrals: Bundle all together?
How do I politely tell my players to shut up about their backstory?
What computer port is this?
Why is the episode called "The Last of the Starks"?
Do oversize pulley wheels increase derailleur capacity?
Capturing the entire webpage with WebExecute's CaptureImage
What are my options legally if NYC company is not paying salary?
Why does this pattern in powers happen?
Is it safe to keep the GPU on 100% utilization for a very long time?
Trying to understand a summation
Align a table column at a specific symbol
Crime rates in a post-scarcity economy
What's an appropriate age to involve kids in life changing decisions?
How to explain intravenous drug abuse to a 6-year-old?
Should one save up to purchase a house/condo or maximize their 401(k) first?
History: Per Leviticus 19:27 would the apostles have had corner locks ala Hassidim today?
Is this strange Morse signal type common?
Expl3 and recent xparse on overleaf: No expl3 loader detected
Is there a reason why Turkey took the Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, instead of Greece or another of the Balkan states?
Simple Derivative Proof? [on hold]
Proof of derivative of invertible functionHow to make a piecewise function differentiable?The Differentiability of a Piecewise FunctionProof of Lipschitz continuousA question about existence of derivative of function at ZeroQuestion about derivative proof :)Derivative of a power functionProperties of the mean value theorem derivativeIs a function strictly increasing if its derivative is positive at all point but critical points?Limit definition of a derivative proof?
$begingroup$
Suppose that $f$ is a function with the following properties:
$f$ is differentiable everywhere
$f(x+y) = f(x)f(y), f(0)≠0$
$f'(0)=1$
$f(0)=1$
How do you prove that $f(x)>0$ for all values of $x$? Please explain the steps, as I am in an intro class.
algebra-precalculus functions derivatives
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by YuiTo Cheng, RRL, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會, TheSimpliFire, user21820 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – YuiTo Cheng, RRL, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會, TheSimpliFire, user21820
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that $f$ is a function with the following properties:
$f$ is differentiable everywhere
$f(x+y) = f(x)f(y), f(0)≠0$
$f'(0)=1$
$f(0)=1$
How do you prove that $f(x)>0$ for all values of $x$? Please explain the steps, as I am in an intro class.
algebra-precalculus functions derivatives
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by YuiTo Cheng, RRL, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會, TheSimpliFire, user21820 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – YuiTo Cheng, RRL, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會, TheSimpliFire, user21820
$begingroup$
Here is a helpful clue. For any base "b". $b^x+y = b^xb^y$
$endgroup$
– Q the Platypus
May 4 at 23:48
$begingroup$
Incidentally, the assumption that $f$ is differentiable everywhere is redundant. Just from the assumption that $f$ is differentiable at $x=0$ we then get $lim_hto 0 fracf(x+h)-f(x)h = lim_hto 0 fracf(x)f(h)-f(x)h = f(x) lim_hto 0 fracf(h)-1h = f(x) f'(0) = f(x)$ exists for every $x$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
May 5 at 5:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that $f$ is a function with the following properties:
$f$ is differentiable everywhere
$f(x+y) = f(x)f(y), f(0)≠0$
$f'(0)=1$
$f(0)=1$
How do you prove that $f(x)>0$ for all values of $x$? Please explain the steps, as I am in an intro class.
algebra-precalculus functions derivatives
New contributor
$endgroup$
Suppose that $f$ is a function with the following properties:
$f$ is differentiable everywhere
$f(x+y) = f(x)f(y), f(0)≠0$
$f'(0)=1$
$f(0)=1$
How do you prove that $f(x)>0$ for all values of $x$? Please explain the steps, as I am in an intro class.
algebra-precalculus functions derivatives
algebra-precalculus functions derivatives
New contributor
New contributor
edited May 5 at 1:37
YuiTo Cheng
3,21161145
3,21161145
New contributor
asked May 4 at 23:45
MaceyMacey
132
132
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by YuiTo Cheng, RRL, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會, TheSimpliFire, user21820 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – YuiTo Cheng, RRL, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會, TheSimpliFire, user21820
put on hold as off-topic by YuiTo Cheng, RRL, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會, TheSimpliFire, user21820 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – YuiTo Cheng, RRL, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會, TheSimpliFire, user21820
$begingroup$
Here is a helpful clue. For any base "b". $b^x+y = b^xb^y$
$endgroup$
– Q the Platypus
May 4 at 23:48
$begingroup$
Incidentally, the assumption that $f$ is differentiable everywhere is redundant. Just from the assumption that $f$ is differentiable at $x=0$ we then get $lim_hto 0 fracf(x+h)-f(x)h = lim_hto 0 fracf(x)f(h)-f(x)h = f(x) lim_hto 0 fracf(h)-1h = f(x) f'(0) = f(x)$ exists for every $x$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
May 5 at 5:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a helpful clue. For any base "b". $b^x+y = b^xb^y$
$endgroup$
– Q the Platypus
May 4 at 23:48
$begingroup$
Incidentally, the assumption that $f$ is differentiable everywhere is redundant. Just from the assumption that $f$ is differentiable at $x=0$ we then get $lim_hto 0 fracf(x+h)-f(x)h = lim_hto 0 fracf(x)f(h)-f(x)h = f(x) lim_hto 0 fracf(h)-1h = f(x) f'(0) = f(x)$ exists for every $x$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
May 5 at 5:24
$begingroup$
Here is a helpful clue. For any base "b". $b^x+y = b^xb^y$
$endgroup$
– Q the Platypus
May 4 at 23:48
$begingroup$
Here is a helpful clue. For any base "b". $b^x+y = b^xb^y$
$endgroup$
– Q the Platypus
May 4 at 23:48
$begingroup$
Incidentally, the assumption that $f$ is differentiable everywhere is redundant. Just from the assumption that $f$ is differentiable at $x=0$ we then get $lim_hto 0 fracf(x+h)-f(x)h = lim_hto 0 fracf(x)f(h)-f(x)h = f(x) lim_hto 0 fracf(h)-1h = f(x) f'(0) = f(x)$ exists for every $x$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
May 5 at 5:24
$begingroup$
Incidentally, the assumption that $f$ is differentiable everywhere is redundant. Just from the assumption that $f$ is differentiable at $x=0$ we then get $lim_hto 0 fracf(x+h)-f(x)h = lim_hto 0 fracf(x)f(h)-f(x)h = f(x) lim_hto 0 fracf(h)-1h = f(x) f'(0) = f(x)$ exists for every $x$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
May 5 at 5:24
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For any $xinBbb R$, we have $f(x)=f(frac x2+frac x2)=left(f(x/2)right)^2geq0$, so we know $f(x)geq0$ for all $xinBbb R$. Now suppose $f(x_0)=0$. Then $f(0)=f(x_0+(-x_0))=f(x_0)f(-x_0)=0$, which is a contradiction. Thus $f(x)>0$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first step when thinking about a problem like this would be to ask "What would happen if $f(z) = 0$ for some value?". Well since $f(x + y) = f(x)f(y)$ that would mean you could subtract z from any number to find a $f(x)f(z)$ pair that would have to equal zero. So all the numbers would have to be zero, which is contradicted by the questions requirement that $f(0)=1$.
You can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Any positive number times a negative number is a negative number. So if there was a number that make $f(x)$ negative then you could always find a $f(x)f(y)$ that would also be negative and force f(0) to be negative which we know it is not.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what you mean when you say you can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Do you mean that saying something like f(z) = -1 for some value then you would need an x+y pair that = -1? Sorry, I am not good at understanding proofs.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you diffentiate the equality wrt. $x$, you get $f'(x+y)=f'(x)f(y)$, so for $x=0$ you get $$f'(y)=f(y)$$
You may know that the solutions of this differential equation are of the form $lambda e^x$. Applying $f'(0)=1$ you get $f(x)=e^x$ as a unique solution, and it is indeed $>0$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you know that f(x) must be greater than 0 if f'(y)=f(y)? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:03
$begingroup$
$f'=f$ is a differential equation, which I solve to answer the question. Read until the end, I can conclude by saying that the exponential is $>0$
$endgroup$
– elidiot
May 5 at 0:05
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For any $xinBbb R$, we have $f(x)=f(frac x2+frac x2)=left(f(x/2)right)^2geq0$, so we know $f(x)geq0$ for all $xinBbb R$. Now suppose $f(x_0)=0$. Then $f(0)=f(x_0+(-x_0))=f(x_0)f(-x_0)=0$, which is a contradiction. Thus $f(x)>0$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For any $xinBbb R$, we have $f(x)=f(frac x2+frac x2)=left(f(x/2)right)^2geq0$, so we know $f(x)geq0$ for all $xinBbb R$. Now suppose $f(x_0)=0$. Then $f(0)=f(x_0+(-x_0))=f(x_0)f(-x_0)=0$, which is a contradiction. Thus $f(x)>0$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For any $xinBbb R$, we have $f(x)=f(frac x2+frac x2)=left(f(x/2)right)^2geq0$, so we know $f(x)geq0$ for all $xinBbb R$. Now suppose $f(x_0)=0$. Then $f(0)=f(x_0+(-x_0))=f(x_0)f(-x_0)=0$, which is a contradiction. Thus $f(x)>0$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
For any $xinBbb R$, we have $f(x)=f(frac x2+frac x2)=left(f(x/2)right)^2geq0$, so we know $f(x)geq0$ for all $xinBbb R$. Now suppose $f(x_0)=0$. Then $f(0)=f(x_0+(-x_0))=f(x_0)f(-x_0)=0$, which is a contradiction. Thus $f(x)>0$ for all $x$.
edited May 5 at 0:10
answered May 4 at 23:52
ClaytonClayton
20.1k33488
20.1k33488
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first step when thinking about a problem like this would be to ask "What would happen if $f(z) = 0$ for some value?". Well since $f(x + y) = f(x)f(y)$ that would mean you could subtract z from any number to find a $f(x)f(z)$ pair that would have to equal zero. So all the numbers would have to be zero, which is contradicted by the questions requirement that $f(0)=1$.
You can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Any positive number times a negative number is a negative number. So if there was a number that make $f(x)$ negative then you could always find a $f(x)f(y)$ that would also be negative and force f(0) to be negative which we know it is not.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what you mean when you say you can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Do you mean that saying something like f(z) = -1 for some value then you would need an x+y pair that = -1? Sorry, I am not good at understanding proofs.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first step when thinking about a problem like this would be to ask "What would happen if $f(z) = 0$ for some value?". Well since $f(x + y) = f(x)f(y)$ that would mean you could subtract z from any number to find a $f(x)f(z)$ pair that would have to equal zero. So all the numbers would have to be zero, which is contradicted by the questions requirement that $f(0)=1$.
You can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Any positive number times a negative number is a negative number. So if there was a number that make $f(x)$ negative then you could always find a $f(x)f(y)$ that would also be negative and force f(0) to be negative which we know it is not.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what you mean when you say you can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Do you mean that saying something like f(z) = -1 for some value then you would need an x+y pair that = -1? Sorry, I am not good at understanding proofs.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first step when thinking about a problem like this would be to ask "What would happen if $f(z) = 0$ for some value?". Well since $f(x + y) = f(x)f(y)$ that would mean you could subtract z from any number to find a $f(x)f(z)$ pair that would have to equal zero. So all the numbers would have to be zero, which is contradicted by the questions requirement that $f(0)=1$.
You can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Any positive number times a negative number is a negative number. So if there was a number that make $f(x)$ negative then you could always find a $f(x)f(y)$ that would also be negative and force f(0) to be negative which we know it is not.
$endgroup$
The first step when thinking about a problem like this would be to ask "What would happen if $f(z) = 0$ for some value?". Well since $f(x + y) = f(x)f(y)$ that would mean you could subtract z from any number to find a $f(x)f(z)$ pair that would have to equal zero. So all the numbers would have to be zero, which is contradicted by the questions requirement that $f(0)=1$.
You can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Any positive number times a negative number is a negative number. So if there was a number that make $f(x)$ negative then you could always find a $f(x)f(y)$ that would also be negative and force f(0) to be negative which we know it is not.
edited May 5 at 0:30
answered May 5 at 0:08
Q the PlatypusQ the Platypus
2,9821136
2,9821136
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what you mean when you say you can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Do you mean that saying something like f(z) = -1 for some value then you would need an x+y pair that = -1? Sorry, I am not good at understanding proofs.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what you mean when you say you can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Do you mean that saying something like f(z) = -1 for some value then you would need an x+y pair that = -1? Sorry, I am not good at understanding proofs.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:25
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what you mean when you say you can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Do you mean that saying something like f(z) = -1 for some value then you would need an x+y pair that = -1? Sorry, I am not good at understanding proofs.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:25
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what you mean when you say you can make a similar argument for negative numbers. Do you mean that saying something like f(z) = -1 for some value then you would need an x+y pair that = -1? Sorry, I am not good at understanding proofs.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you diffentiate the equality wrt. $x$, you get $f'(x+y)=f'(x)f(y)$, so for $x=0$ you get $$f'(y)=f(y)$$
You may know that the solutions of this differential equation are of the form $lambda e^x$. Applying $f'(0)=1$ you get $f(x)=e^x$ as a unique solution, and it is indeed $>0$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you know that f(x) must be greater than 0 if f'(y)=f(y)? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:03
$begingroup$
$f'=f$ is a differential equation, which I solve to answer the question. Read until the end, I can conclude by saying that the exponential is $>0$
$endgroup$
– elidiot
May 5 at 0:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you diffentiate the equality wrt. $x$, you get $f'(x+y)=f'(x)f(y)$, so for $x=0$ you get $$f'(y)=f(y)$$
You may know that the solutions of this differential equation are of the form $lambda e^x$. Applying $f'(0)=1$ you get $f(x)=e^x$ as a unique solution, and it is indeed $>0$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you know that f(x) must be greater than 0 if f'(y)=f(y)? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:03
$begingroup$
$f'=f$ is a differential equation, which I solve to answer the question. Read until the end, I can conclude by saying that the exponential is $>0$
$endgroup$
– elidiot
May 5 at 0:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you diffentiate the equality wrt. $x$, you get $f'(x+y)=f'(x)f(y)$, so for $x=0$ you get $$f'(y)=f(y)$$
You may know that the solutions of this differential equation are of the form $lambda e^x$. Applying $f'(0)=1$ you get $f(x)=e^x$ as a unique solution, and it is indeed $>0$
$endgroup$
If you diffentiate the equality wrt. $x$, you get $f'(x+y)=f'(x)f(y)$, so for $x=0$ you get $$f'(y)=f(y)$$
You may know that the solutions of this differential equation are of the form $lambda e^x$. Applying $f'(0)=1$ you get $f(x)=e^x$ as a unique solution, and it is indeed $>0$
answered May 4 at 23:58
elidiotelidiot
1,27814
1,27814
$begingroup$
How do you know that f(x) must be greater than 0 if f'(y)=f(y)? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:03
$begingroup$
$f'=f$ is a differential equation, which I solve to answer the question. Read until the end, I can conclude by saying that the exponential is $>0$
$endgroup$
– elidiot
May 5 at 0:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How do you know that f(x) must be greater than 0 if f'(y)=f(y)? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:03
$begingroup$
$f'=f$ is a differential equation, which I solve to answer the question. Read until the end, I can conclude by saying that the exponential is $>0$
$endgroup$
– elidiot
May 5 at 0:05
$begingroup$
How do you know that f(x) must be greater than 0 if f'(y)=f(y)? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:03
$begingroup$
How do you know that f(x) must be greater than 0 if f'(y)=f(y)? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Macey
May 5 at 0:03
$begingroup$
$f'=f$ is a differential equation, which I solve to answer the question. Read until the end, I can conclude by saying that the exponential is $>0$
$endgroup$
– elidiot
May 5 at 0:05
$begingroup$
$f'=f$ is a differential equation, which I solve to answer the question. Read until the end, I can conclude by saying that the exponential is $>0$
$endgroup$
– elidiot
May 5 at 0:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a helpful clue. For any base "b". $b^x+y = b^xb^y$
$endgroup$
– Q the Platypus
May 4 at 23:48
$begingroup$
Incidentally, the assumption that $f$ is differentiable everywhere is redundant. Just from the assumption that $f$ is differentiable at $x=0$ we then get $lim_hto 0 fracf(x+h)-f(x)h = lim_hto 0 fracf(x)f(h)-f(x)h = f(x) lim_hto 0 fracf(h)-1h = f(x) f'(0) = f(x)$ exists for every $x$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
May 5 at 5:24