Uniform squishy infillWhat are the advantages of gyroid infill?Different infill in the same partWhy are my prints so defective?How to slice this wing so it has a smooth infill like perimetersSquare and parallel infill patternsDifferent infill in the same partHow are infill paths connect to form an efficient path that respect the object's geometry?Infill failure at the far corner of two different printsWhat are the advantages of gyroid infill?Internal wall does not print in horizontal print orientationInfill is rough - how to enhance?Infill failure when printing larger prints
Multi tool use
We are two immediate neighbors who forged our own powers to form concatenated relationship. Who are we?
Why did Captain America age?
Is it a good idea to copy a trader when investing?
Peculiarities in low dimensions or low order or etc
What does this quote in Small Gods refer to?
Why is the Sun made of light elements only?
Why are parallelograms defined as quadrilaterals? What term would encompass polygons with greater than two parallel pairs?
Was the Highlands Ranch shooting the 115th mass shooting in the US in 2019
Can the president of the United States be guilty of insider trading?
What's the "magic similar to the Knock spell" referenced in the Dungeon of the Mad Mage adventure?
When do you stop "pushing" a book?
Is ‘despite that’ right?
How is CoreiX like Corei5, i7 is related to Haswell, Ivy Bridge?
Why are low spin tetrahedral complexes so rare?
Passport stamps art, can it be done?
How can I avoid subordinates and coworkers leaving work until the last minute, then having no time for revisions?
Is it a Munchausen Number?
No such column 'DeveloperName' on entity 'RecordType' after Summer '19 release on sandbox
What was the notion of limit that Newton used?
Why did they go to Dragonstone?
is it permitted to swallow spit on a fast day?
Translation of the latin word 'sit' in Thomas Aquinas' works
A Cunning Riley Riddle
Electric kick drum pedal starts oscillating in such a way that it does not register hits
Uniform squishy infill
What are the advantages of gyroid infill?Different infill in the same partWhy are my prints so defective?How to slice this wing so it has a smooth infill like perimetersSquare and parallel infill patternsDifferent infill in the same partHow are infill paths connect to form an efficient path that respect the object's geometry?Infill failure at the far corner of two different printsWhat are the advantages of gyroid infill?Internal wall does not print in horizontal print orientationInfill is rough - how to enhance?Infill failure when printing larger prints
$begingroup$
I try to print a stamp with flexible filaments. The problem I encounter is that the filament is flexible, but not soft. This leads to small differences in height to parts of the stamp not working.
One solution would be to add a small 'cushion' to add some squishyness to the stamp. I designed the stamp and the 'cushion' but now the question arises:
"Which infill will provide the best uniform squishyness (in one axis)?"
I did a test with cubic infill of Cura, and although it becomes quite squishy, some parts are squishier than other parts of the block.
TLDR; Trying to print a squishy cube, where in one axis all areas of the cube have the same squishyness.
slicing infill flexible
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I try to print a stamp with flexible filaments. The problem I encounter is that the filament is flexible, but not soft. This leads to small differences in height to parts of the stamp not working.
One solution would be to add a small 'cushion' to add some squishyness to the stamp. I designed the stamp and the 'cushion' but now the question arises:
"Which infill will provide the best uniform squishyness (in one axis)?"
I did a test with cubic infill of Cura, and although it becomes quite squishy, some parts are squishier than other parts of the block.
TLDR; Trying to print a squishy cube, where in one axis all areas of the cube have the same squishyness.
slicing infill flexible
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I try to print a stamp with flexible filaments. The problem I encounter is that the filament is flexible, but not soft. This leads to small differences in height to parts of the stamp not working.
One solution would be to add a small 'cushion' to add some squishyness to the stamp. I designed the stamp and the 'cushion' but now the question arises:
"Which infill will provide the best uniform squishyness (in one axis)?"
I did a test with cubic infill of Cura, and although it becomes quite squishy, some parts are squishier than other parts of the block.
TLDR; Trying to print a squishy cube, where in one axis all areas of the cube have the same squishyness.
slicing infill flexible
$endgroup$
I try to print a stamp with flexible filaments. The problem I encounter is that the filament is flexible, but not soft. This leads to small differences in height to parts of the stamp not working.
One solution would be to add a small 'cushion' to add some squishyness to the stamp. I designed the stamp and the 'cushion' but now the question arises:
"Which infill will provide the best uniform squishyness (in one axis)?"
I did a test with cubic infill of Cura, and although it becomes quite squishy, some parts are squishier than other parts of the block.
TLDR; Trying to print a squishy cube, where in one axis all areas of the cube have the same squishyness.
slicing infill flexible
slicing infill flexible
asked May 6 at 11:11
E DoeE Doe
4058
4058
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As the rubber stamp needs to be soft in one axis for the whole area, you could use an infill that causes the same softness in all directions, but is sliced as such that the stamp experiences the same softness. Alternatively you can use the specific infill types for flexibility, but beware of the orientation:
- Concentric
- Cross
- Cross 3D
First, to get the same softness in each direction you need to use an infill pattern that has similar/uniform properties (isotropic) in all dimensions.
It is suggested to look into the infill type called "gyroid" (see question What are the advantages of gyroid infill?).
This type of infill is described as:
Gyroid infill is one of the strongest infill types for a given weight, has isotropic properties, and prints relatively fast with reduced material use and a fully connected part interior.
Second, since the stamp has relief, slicing the part may cause different infill height. You could look into Different infill in the same part to e.g. get a solid infill for under the relief to get a uniform infill for the "cushion".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The main problem with Gyroid is that it has been designed for high 'strength' applications. It mainly excels in compression tests (which is highlighted by the links you provide), which is exactly what we do not want. I think for this we need something like a rotated wiggle pattern.
$endgroup$
– E Doe
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@EDoe No, not if printed in flexible filament! Note to not use a very high infill percentage! Look up the examples on internet for examples how flexible parts you get. I've seen fantastic flexible results.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sinusoidal infill provides great squishiness in the infill direction, but you'll still have the problem that where the infill meets the perimeter wall, it'll be less squishy than where the perimeter wall isn't touching any infill. You can reduce this effect by using a stiffer filament for that wall (if you can print with multiple filaments), by adding more perimeters, and by reducing the gap between infills (i.e. increasing the infill density). You can even explicitly design an extra-thick wall on the face that takes the pressure (the engraved face of the stamp), and then a section behind that with the squishy infill.
TBH, I'm not sure that flexible filament is really what you need for a stamp. Soft materials are commonly used for traditional stamp-making more because they're easy to etch than because the stamping works better that way. Print-making uses wooden or metal plates (the equivalent to the stamp) and produces better, more repeatable images than rubber stamps. When you're printing a stamp, you don't need to etch it, so the softness of rubber isn't an advantage for you. My outsider recommendation would be to try using a normal, rigid filament, and sand the surface to the smoothness you need. If you print with the stamp face on the bed, and your first-layer quality is really good on a smooth build plate, you can probably get better results without sanding.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "640"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2f3dprinting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9865%2funiform-squishy-infill%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As the rubber stamp needs to be soft in one axis for the whole area, you could use an infill that causes the same softness in all directions, but is sliced as such that the stamp experiences the same softness. Alternatively you can use the specific infill types for flexibility, but beware of the orientation:
- Concentric
- Cross
- Cross 3D
First, to get the same softness in each direction you need to use an infill pattern that has similar/uniform properties (isotropic) in all dimensions.
It is suggested to look into the infill type called "gyroid" (see question What are the advantages of gyroid infill?).
This type of infill is described as:
Gyroid infill is one of the strongest infill types for a given weight, has isotropic properties, and prints relatively fast with reduced material use and a fully connected part interior.
Second, since the stamp has relief, slicing the part may cause different infill height. You could look into Different infill in the same part to e.g. get a solid infill for under the relief to get a uniform infill for the "cushion".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The main problem with Gyroid is that it has been designed for high 'strength' applications. It mainly excels in compression tests (which is highlighted by the links you provide), which is exactly what we do not want. I think for this we need something like a rotated wiggle pattern.
$endgroup$
– E Doe
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@EDoe No, not if printed in flexible filament! Note to not use a very high infill percentage! Look up the examples on internet for examples how flexible parts you get. I've seen fantastic flexible results.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As the rubber stamp needs to be soft in one axis for the whole area, you could use an infill that causes the same softness in all directions, but is sliced as such that the stamp experiences the same softness. Alternatively you can use the specific infill types for flexibility, but beware of the orientation:
- Concentric
- Cross
- Cross 3D
First, to get the same softness in each direction you need to use an infill pattern that has similar/uniform properties (isotropic) in all dimensions.
It is suggested to look into the infill type called "gyroid" (see question What are the advantages of gyroid infill?).
This type of infill is described as:
Gyroid infill is one of the strongest infill types for a given weight, has isotropic properties, and prints relatively fast with reduced material use and a fully connected part interior.
Second, since the stamp has relief, slicing the part may cause different infill height. You could look into Different infill in the same part to e.g. get a solid infill for under the relief to get a uniform infill for the "cushion".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The main problem with Gyroid is that it has been designed for high 'strength' applications. It mainly excels in compression tests (which is highlighted by the links you provide), which is exactly what we do not want. I think for this we need something like a rotated wiggle pattern.
$endgroup$
– E Doe
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@EDoe No, not if printed in flexible filament! Note to not use a very high infill percentage! Look up the examples on internet for examples how flexible parts you get. I've seen fantastic flexible results.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As the rubber stamp needs to be soft in one axis for the whole area, you could use an infill that causes the same softness in all directions, but is sliced as such that the stamp experiences the same softness. Alternatively you can use the specific infill types for flexibility, but beware of the orientation:
- Concentric
- Cross
- Cross 3D
First, to get the same softness in each direction you need to use an infill pattern that has similar/uniform properties (isotropic) in all dimensions.
It is suggested to look into the infill type called "gyroid" (see question What are the advantages of gyroid infill?).
This type of infill is described as:
Gyroid infill is one of the strongest infill types for a given weight, has isotropic properties, and prints relatively fast with reduced material use and a fully connected part interior.
Second, since the stamp has relief, slicing the part may cause different infill height. You could look into Different infill in the same part to e.g. get a solid infill for under the relief to get a uniform infill for the "cushion".
$endgroup$
As the rubber stamp needs to be soft in one axis for the whole area, you could use an infill that causes the same softness in all directions, but is sliced as such that the stamp experiences the same softness. Alternatively you can use the specific infill types for flexibility, but beware of the orientation:
- Concentric
- Cross
- Cross 3D
First, to get the same softness in each direction you need to use an infill pattern that has similar/uniform properties (isotropic) in all dimensions.
It is suggested to look into the infill type called "gyroid" (see question What are the advantages of gyroid infill?).
This type of infill is described as:
Gyroid infill is one of the strongest infill types for a given weight, has isotropic properties, and prints relatively fast with reduced material use and a fully connected part interior.
Second, since the stamp has relief, slicing the part may cause different infill height. You could look into Different infill in the same part to e.g. get a solid infill for under the relief to get a uniform infill for the "cushion".
edited 2 days ago
answered May 6 at 11:43
0scar0scar
14.5k31854
14.5k31854
$begingroup$
The main problem with Gyroid is that it has been designed for high 'strength' applications. It mainly excels in compression tests (which is highlighted by the links you provide), which is exactly what we do not want. I think for this we need something like a rotated wiggle pattern.
$endgroup$
– E Doe
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@EDoe No, not if printed in flexible filament! Note to not use a very high infill percentage! Look up the examples on internet for examples how flexible parts you get. I've seen fantastic flexible results.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The main problem with Gyroid is that it has been designed for high 'strength' applications. It mainly excels in compression tests (which is highlighted by the links you provide), which is exactly what we do not want. I think for this we need something like a rotated wiggle pattern.
$endgroup$
– E Doe
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@EDoe No, not if printed in flexible filament! Note to not use a very high infill percentage! Look up the examples on internet for examples how flexible parts you get. I've seen fantastic flexible results.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The main problem with Gyroid is that it has been designed for high 'strength' applications. It mainly excels in compression tests (which is highlighted by the links you provide), which is exactly what we do not want. I think for this we need something like a rotated wiggle pattern.
$endgroup$
– E Doe
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The main problem with Gyroid is that it has been designed for high 'strength' applications. It mainly excels in compression tests (which is highlighted by the links you provide), which is exactly what we do not want. I think for this we need something like a rotated wiggle pattern.
$endgroup$
– E Doe
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@EDoe No, not if printed in flexible filament! Note to not use a very high infill percentage! Look up the examples on internet for examples how flexible parts you get. I've seen fantastic flexible results.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@EDoe No, not if printed in flexible filament! Note to not use a very high infill percentage! Look up the examples on internet for examples how flexible parts you get. I've seen fantastic flexible results.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sinusoidal infill provides great squishiness in the infill direction, but you'll still have the problem that where the infill meets the perimeter wall, it'll be less squishy than where the perimeter wall isn't touching any infill. You can reduce this effect by using a stiffer filament for that wall (if you can print with multiple filaments), by adding more perimeters, and by reducing the gap between infills (i.e. increasing the infill density). You can even explicitly design an extra-thick wall on the face that takes the pressure (the engraved face of the stamp), and then a section behind that with the squishy infill.
TBH, I'm not sure that flexible filament is really what you need for a stamp. Soft materials are commonly used for traditional stamp-making more because they're easy to etch than because the stamping works better that way. Print-making uses wooden or metal plates (the equivalent to the stamp) and produces better, more repeatable images than rubber stamps. When you're printing a stamp, you don't need to etch it, so the softness of rubber isn't an advantage for you. My outsider recommendation would be to try using a normal, rigid filament, and sand the surface to the smoothness you need. If you print with the stamp face on the bed, and your first-layer quality is really good on a smooth build plate, you can probably get better results without sanding.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sinusoidal infill provides great squishiness in the infill direction, but you'll still have the problem that where the infill meets the perimeter wall, it'll be less squishy than where the perimeter wall isn't touching any infill. You can reduce this effect by using a stiffer filament for that wall (if you can print with multiple filaments), by adding more perimeters, and by reducing the gap between infills (i.e. increasing the infill density). You can even explicitly design an extra-thick wall on the face that takes the pressure (the engraved face of the stamp), and then a section behind that with the squishy infill.
TBH, I'm not sure that flexible filament is really what you need for a stamp. Soft materials are commonly used for traditional stamp-making more because they're easy to etch than because the stamping works better that way. Print-making uses wooden or metal plates (the equivalent to the stamp) and produces better, more repeatable images than rubber stamps. When you're printing a stamp, you don't need to etch it, so the softness of rubber isn't an advantage for you. My outsider recommendation would be to try using a normal, rigid filament, and sand the surface to the smoothness you need. If you print with the stamp face on the bed, and your first-layer quality is really good on a smooth build plate, you can probably get better results without sanding.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sinusoidal infill provides great squishiness in the infill direction, but you'll still have the problem that where the infill meets the perimeter wall, it'll be less squishy than where the perimeter wall isn't touching any infill. You can reduce this effect by using a stiffer filament for that wall (if you can print with multiple filaments), by adding more perimeters, and by reducing the gap between infills (i.e. increasing the infill density). You can even explicitly design an extra-thick wall on the face that takes the pressure (the engraved face of the stamp), and then a section behind that with the squishy infill.
TBH, I'm not sure that flexible filament is really what you need for a stamp. Soft materials are commonly used for traditional stamp-making more because they're easy to etch than because the stamping works better that way. Print-making uses wooden or metal plates (the equivalent to the stamp) and produces better, more repeatable images than rubber stamps. When you're printing a stamp, you don't need to etch it, so the softness of rubber isn't an advantage for you. My outsider recommendation would be to try using a normal, rigid filament, and sand the surface to the smoothness you need. If you print with the stamp face on the bed, and your first-layer quality is really good on a smooth build plate, you can probably get better results without sanding.
$endgroup$
Sinusoidal infill provides great squishiness in the infill direction, but you'll still have the problem that where the infill meets the perimeter wall, it'll be less squishy than where the perimeter wall isn't touching any infill. You can reduce this effect by using a stiffer filament for that wall (if you can print with multiple filaments), by adding more perimeters, and by reducing the gap between infills (i.e. increasing the infill density). You can even explicitly design an extra-thick wall on the face that takes the pressure (the engraved face of the stamp), and then a section behind that with the squishy infill.
TBH, I'm not sure that flexible filament is really what you need for a stamp. Soft materials are commonly used for traditional stamp-making more because they're easy to etch than because the stamping works better that way. Print-making uses wooden or metal plates (the equivalent to the stamp) and produces better, more repeatable images than rubber stamps. When you're printing a stamp, you don't need to etch it, so the softness of rubber isn't an advantage for you. My outsider recommendation would be to try using a normal, rigid filament, and sand the surface to the smoothness you need. If you print with the stamp face on the bed, and your first-layer quality is really good on a smooth build plate, you can probably get better results without sanding.
answered 14 hours ago
Dan HulmeDan Hulme
285115
285115
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to 3D Printing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2f3dprinting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9865%2funiform-squishy-infill%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
ny7GxUjj,IAu7Lr ODWYw4YjD1SUDHxKZioyvM1NLMOLzYmUE