How to increase row height of a table and vertically “align middle”?Paragraph column in tabular working only in the first columnIncrease row height of tabularxIncrease LaTeX table row heightIncrease table row height but not separation from surrounding textIs there a simple way to create a latex equivalent of this (ms)word table template?Increase the height of the row in the tableVertically align first multiline row of tableHow can I find the cell height in a tabular?Tabular header vertical align and row heightHow to define a minimal height for all rows of a tabular?

Best species to breed to intelligence

Which scripture contains sri datta stavam?

Is there an application which does HTTP PUT?

Why can't I prove summation identities without guessing?

Intersecting with the x-axis / intersecting the x-axis

How to make a language evolve quickly?

How to select certain lines (n, n+4, n+8, n+12...) from the file?

Why is the Sun made of light elements only?

Succinct and gender-neutral Russian word for "writer"

Is there any evidence to support the claim that the United States was "suckered into WW1" by Zionists, made by Benjamin Freedman in his 1961 speech

If a character drops a magic item that turns on/off, does that item turn off when they drop it?

Early arrival in Australia, early check in not available

Why does a variable size struct not compile in the Arduino IDE?

Renting a house to a graduate student in my department

Company threw a surprise party for the CEO, 3 weeks later management says we have to pay for it, do I have to?

Print a string of characters with their occurrences

What food production methods would allow a metropolis like New York to become self sufficient

What is the name of meteoroids which hit Moon, Mars, or pretty much anything that isn’t the Earth?

Is it bad writing or bad story telling if first person narrative contains more information than the narrator knows?

Cryptography and elliptic curves

Why does increasing the sampling rate make implementing an anti-aliasing filter easier?

How to slow yourself down (for playing nice with others)

What can cause an unfrozen indoor copper drain pipe to crack?

Why is PerfectForwardSecrecy considered OK, when it has same defects as salt-less password hashing?



How to increase row height of a table and vertically “align middle”?


Paragraph column in tabular working only in the first columnIncrease row height of tabularxIncrease LaTeX table row heightIncrease table row height but not separation from surrounding textIs there a simple way to create a latex equivalent of this (ms)word table template?Increase the height of the row in the tableVertically align first multiline row of tableHow can I find the cell height in a tabular?Tabular header vertical align and row heightHow to define a minimal height for all rows of a tabular?













6















I am writing in IEEEtran double-column environment and have a table like the following. I need to increase the row height so the equations in the second column can fit in. I tried simply to use renewcommandarraystretch2.5 where every thing can fit in but the vertical alignment is not very good. For example, the first row are not aligned and it seems that each cell is not perfectly vertically middle aligned if you look closely. They are very slightly a little higher or a little lower. My question is, besides increasing the row height, how do I make each cell perfectly middle align in the vertical direction?



The tables shown below are of arraystretch 1 and 2.5, respectively.



enter image description here



The codes for producing the tables are



begintable 
captionarraystretch = 1

renewcommandarraystretch1
centering%
begintabularccc
toprule
multirow1*No. & Equations & Current phasorstabularnewline
midrule
multirow2*1 & multirow2*$begincases
i_A=1\
i_B=2\
i_C=3
endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
cmidrule3-3
& & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
midrule
multirow2*2 & multirow2*$begincases
i_A=4\
i_B=5\
i_C=6
endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
cmidrule3-3
& & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
bottomrule
endtabular
endtable

begintable
captionarraystretch = 2.5

renewcommandarraystretch2.5
centering%
begintabularccc
toprule
multirow1*No. & Equations & Current phasorstabularnewline
midrule
multirow2*1 & multirow2*$begincases
i_A=1\
i_B=2\
i_C=3
endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
cmidrule3-3
& & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
midrule
multirow2*2 & multirow2*$begincases
i_A=4\
i_B=5\
i_C=6
endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
cmidrule3-3
& & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
bottomrule
endtabular
endtable









share|improve this question




























    6















    I am writing in IEEEtran double-column environment and have a table like the following. I need to increase the row height so the equations in the second column can fit in. I tried simply to use renewcommandarraystretch2.5 where every thing can fit in but the vertical alignment is not very good. For example, the first row are not aligned and it seems that each cell is not perfectly vertically middle aligned if you look closely. They are very slightly a little higher or a little lower. My question is, besides increasing the row height, how do I make each cell perfectly middle align in the vertical direction?



    The tables shown below are of arraystretch 1 and 2.5, respectively.



    enter image description here



    The codes for producing the tables are



    begintable 
    captionarraystretch = 1

    renewcommandarraystretch1
    centering%
    begintabularccc
    toprule
    multirow1*No. & Equations & Current phasorstabularnewline
    midrule
    multirow2*1 & multirow2*$begincases
    i_A=1\
    i_B=2\
    i_C=3
    endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
    cmidrule3-3
    & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
    midrule
    multirow2*2 & multirow2*$begincases
    i_A=4\
    i_B=5\
    i_C=6
    endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
    cmidrule3-3
    & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
    bottomrule
    endtabular
    endtable

    begintable
    captionarraystretch = 2.5

    renewcommandarraystretch2.5
    centering%
    begintabularccc
    toprule
    multirow1*No. & Equations & Current phasorstabularnewline
    midrule
    multirow2*1 & multirow2*$begincases
    i_A=1\
    i_B=2\
    i_C=3
    endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
    cmidrule3-3
    & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
    midrule
    multirow2*2 & multirow2*$begincases
    i_A=4\
    i_B=5\
    i_C=6
    endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
    cmidrule3-3
    & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
    bottomrule
    endtabular
    endtable









    share|improve this question


























      6












      6








      6








      I am writing in IEEEtran double-column environment and have a table like the following. I need to increase the row height so the equations in the second column can fit in. I tried simply to use renewcommandarraystretch2.5 where every thing can fit in but the vertical alignment is not very good. For example, the first row are not aligned and it seems that each cell is not perfectly vertically middle aligned if you look closely. They are very slightly a little higher or a little lower. My question is, besides increasing the row height, how do I make each cell perfectly middle align in the vertical direction?



      The tables shown below are of arraystretch 1 and 2.5, respectively.



      enter image description here



      The codes for producing the tables are



      begintable 
      captionarraystretch = 1

      renewcommandarraystretch1
      centering%
      begintabularccc
      toprule
      multirow1*No. & Equations & Current phasorstabularnewline
      midrule
      multirow2*1 & multirow2*$begincases
      i_A=1\
      i_B=2\
      i_C=3
      endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
      cmidrule3-3
      & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
      midrule
      multirow2*2 & multirow2*$begincases
      i_A=4\
      i_B=5\
      i_C=6
      endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
      cmidrule3-3
      & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
      bottomrule
      endtabular
      endtable

      begintable
      captionarraystretch = 2.5

      renewcommandarraystretch2.5
      centering%
      begintabularccc
      toprule
      multirow1*No. & Equations & Current phasorstabularnewline
      midrule
      multirow2*1 & multirow2*$begincases
      i_A=1\
      i_B=2\
      i_C=3
      endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
      cmidrule3-3
      & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
      midrule
      multirow2*2 & multirow2*$begincases
      i_A=4\
      i_B=5\
      i_C=6
      endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
      cmidrule3-3
      & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
      bottomrule
      endtabular
      endtable









      share|improve this question
















      I am writing in IEEEtran double-column environment and have a table like the following. I need to increase the row height so the equations in the second column can fit in. I tried simply to use renewcommandarraystretch2.5 where every thing can fit in but the vertical alignment is not very good. For example, the first row are not aligned and it seems that each cell is not perfectly vertically middle aligned if you look closely. They are very slightly a little higher or a little lower. My question is, besides increasing the row height, how do I make each cell perfectly middle align in the vertical direction?



      The tables shown below are of arraystretch 1 and 2.5, respectively.



      enter image description here



      The codes for producing the tables are



      begintable 
      captionarraystretch = 1

      renewcommandarraystretch1
      centering%
      begintabularccc
      toprule
      multirow1*No. & Equations & Current phasorstabularnewline
      midrule
      multirow2*1 & multirow2*$begincases
      i_A=1\
      i_B=2\
      i_C=3
      endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
      cmidrule3-3
      & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
      midrule
      multirow2*2 & multirow2*$begincases
      i_A=4\
      i_B=5\
      i_C=6
      endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
      cmidrule3-3
      & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
      bottomrule
      endtabular
      endtable

      begintable
      captionarraystretch = 2.5

      renewcommandarraystretch2.5
      centering%
      begintabularccc
      toprule
      multirow1*No. & Equations & Current phasorstabularnewline
      midrule
      multirow2*1 & multirow2*$begincases
      i_A=1\
      i_B=2\
      i_C=3
      endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
      cmidrule3-3
      & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
      midrule
      multirow2*2 & multirow2*$begincases
      i_A=4\
      i_B=5\
      i_C=6
      endcases$ & 1, 2, 3tabularnewline
      cmidrule3-3
      & & 4, 5, 6tabularnewline
      bottomrule
      endtabular
      endtable






      tables






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 6 at 21:44









      Mico

      290k32398786




      290k32398786










      asked May 6 at 20:25









      nanjunnanjun

      18517




      18517




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          The structure of your table is sufficiently unusual to warrant typesetting the contents of each cell as a separate custom, vertically centered tabular environment in its own right.



          In the following example, I define two such custom tabular-like environments:



          • mytabC, if the width of the tabular is supposed to equal the natural width of the cell's contents, and


          • mytabP, if the width of the tabular is supposed to be a fixed length -- say, the width of the contents of the corresponding header cell.


          In the following screenshot, the upper row employs mytabC for columns 1 and 2, and mytabP for the third column. The lower row employs mytabC for all 3 columns. I provide both types of solutions as it's not clear to me whether the midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell or if its width is supposed to be the natural width of the cell's contents.



          enter image description here



          documentclassIEEEtran
          usepackagebooktabs,amsmath,array,ragged2e
          %% Some housekeeping:
          newlengthmylen
          newcolumntypeP[1]>Centeringarraybackslashp#1
          %% Macros to generate two custom 'tabular' environments:
          newcommandmytabC[1]%
          begintabular[c]@ c @ #1 endtabular
          newcommandmytabP[2]settowidthmylen#1%
          begintabular[c]@ Pmylen @ #2 endtabular

          begindocument
          begintable
          captionarraystretch = 1
          centering

          begintabular@ccc@
          toprule
          No. & Equations & Current phasors\
          midrule
          mytabC1 &
          mytabC$begincases i_A=1\i_B=2\i_C=3 endcases$ &
          mytabPCurrent phasors1, 2, 3\ midrule 4, 5, 6\
          midrule
          mytabC2 &
          mytabC$begincases i_D=4\i_E=5\i_F=6 endcases$ &
          mytabC7, 8, 9\ midrule 0, 1, 2\
          bottomrule
          endtabular
          endtable
          enddocument





          share|improve this answer

























          • Thank you for the answer. In the last column, midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell. The cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered, is there a way to center those?

            – nanjun
            2 days ago











          • @nanjun - Thanks for this clarification. (You screenshots didn't hint at you requirement for the contents of the final column.) Real quick: Should the midrule in the final column always be centered vertically within the cell, or might there be cases where this isn't the case?

            – Mico
            2 days ago











          • Thank you again. The midrule in the last column would always be centered vertically within the larger cell. The smaller cell above and below the midrule also need to be vertically centered. Right now the row " No. 1" in your answer looks good except that the two samller cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered themselves. In other words, within each cell, no matter it is a small cell or large cell, the content are always meant to be vertically centered.

            – nanjun
            2 days ago












          • @nanjun - To solve your updated formatting requirements for the material in column 3, it would be really helpful to know what kind of material may be expected to occur in column 2. E.g., will this updated material always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows? Please advise.

            – Mico
            yesterday











          • Yes, @Mico. The 2nd column will always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows.

            – nanjun
            yesterday












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489489%2fhow-to-increase-row-height-of-a-table-and-vertically-align-middle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          The structure of your table is sufficiently unusual to warrant typesetting the contents of each cell as a separate custom, vertically centered tabular environment in its own right.



          In the following example, I define two such custom tabular-like environments:



          • mytabC, if the width of the tabular is supposed to equal the natural width of the cell's contents, and


          • mytabP, if the width of the tabular is supposed to be a fixed length -- say, the width of the contents of the corresponding header cell.


          In the following screenshot, the upper row employs mytabC for columns 1 and 2, and mytabP for the third column. The lower row employs mytabC for all 3 columns. I provide both types of solutions as it's not clear to me whether the midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell or if its width is supposed to be the natural width of the cell's contents.



          enter image description here



          documentclassIEEEtran
          usepackagebooktabs,amsmath,array,ragged2e
          %% Some housekeeping:
          newlengthmylen
          newcolumntypeP[1]>Centeringarraybackslashp#1
          %% Macros to generate two custom 'tabular' environments:
          newcommandmytabC[1]%
          begintabular[c]@ c @ #1 endtabular
          newcommandmytabP[2]settowidthmylen#1%
          begintabular[c]@ Pmylen @ #2 endtabular

          begindocument
          begintable
          captionarraystretch = 1
          centering

          begintabular@ccc@
          toprule
          No. & Equations & Current phasors\
          midrule
          mytabC1 &
          mytabC$begincases i_A=1\i_B=2\i_C=3 endcases$ &
          mytabPCurrent phasors1, 2, 3\ midrule 4, 5, 6\
          midrule
          mytabC2 &
          mytabC$begincases i_D=4\i_E=5\i_F=6 endcases$ &
          mytabC7, 8, 9\ midrule 0, 1, 2\
          bottomrule
          endtabular
          endtable
          enddocument





          share|improve this answer

























          • Thank you for the answer. In the last column, midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell. The cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered, is there a way to center those?

            – nanjun
            2 days ago











          • @nanjun - Thanks for this clarification. (You screenshots didn't hint at you requirement for the contents of the final column.) Real quick: Should the midrule in the final column always be centered vertically within the cell, or might there be cases where this isn't the case?

            – Mico
            2 days ago











          • Thank you again. The midrule in the last column would always be centered vertically within the larger cell. The smaller cell above and below the midrule also need to be vertically centered. Right now the row " No. 1" in your answer looks good except that the two samller cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered themselves. In other words, within each cell, no matter it is a small cell or large cell, the content are always meant to be vertically centered.

            – nanjun
            2 days ago












          • @nanjun - To solve your updated formatting requirements for the material in column 3, it would be really helpful to know what kind of material may be expected to occur in column 2. E.g., will this updated material always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows? Please advise.

            – Mico
            yesterday











          • Yes, @Mico. The 2nd column will always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows.

            – nanjun
            yesterday
















          7














          The structure of your table is sufficiently unusual to warrant typesetting the contents of each cell as a separate custom, vertically centered tabular environment in its own right.



          In the following example, I define two such custom tabular-like environments:



          • mytabC, if the width of the tabular is supposed to equal the natural width of the cell's contents, and


          • mytabP, if the width of the tabular is supposed to be a fixed length -- say, the width of the contents of the corresponding header cell.


          In the following screenshot, the upper row employs mytabC for columns 1 and 2, and mytabP for the third column. The lower row employs mytabC for all 3 columns. I provide both types of solutions as it's not clear to me whether the midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell or if its width is supposed to be the natural width of the cell's contents.



          enter image description here



          documentclassIEEEtran
          usepackagebooktabs,amsmath,array,ragged2e
          %% Some housekeeping:
          newlengthmylen
          newcolumntypeP[1]>Centeringarraybackslashp#1
          %% Macros to generate two custom 'tabular' environments:
          newcommandmytabC[1]%
          begintabular[c]@ c @ #1 endtabular
          newcommandmytabP[2]settowidthmylen#1%
          begintabular[c]@ Pmylen @ #2 endtabular

          begindocument
          begintable
          captionarraystretch = 1
          centering

          begintabular@ccc@
          toprule
          No. & Equations & Current phasors\
          midrule
          mytabC1 &
          mytabC$begincases i_A=1\i_B=2\i_C=3 endcases$ &
          mytabPCurrent phasors1, 2, 3\ midrule 4, 5, 6\
          midrule
          mytabC2 &
          mytabC$begincases i_D=4\i_E=5\i_F=6 endcases$ &
          mytabC7, 8, 9\ midrule 0, 1, 2\
          bottomrule
          endtabular
          endtable
          enddocument





          share|improve this answer

























          • Thank you for the answer. In the last column, midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell. The cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered, is there a way to center those?

            – nanjun
            2 days ago











          • @nanjun - Thanks for this clarification. (You screenshots didn't hint at you requirement for the contents of the final column.) Real quick: Should the midrule in the final column always be centered vertically within the cell, or might there be cases where this isn't the case?

            – Mico
            2 days ago











          • Thank you again. The midrule in the last column would always be centered vertically within the larger cell. The smaller cell above and below the midrule also need to be vertically centered. Right now the row " No. 1" in your answer looks good except that the two samller cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered themselves. In other words, within each cell, no matter it is a small cell or large cell, the content are always meant to be vertically centered.

            – nanjun
            2 days ago












          • @nanjun - To solve your updated formatting requirements for the material in column 3, it would be really helpful to know what kind of material may be expected to occur in column 2. E.g., will this updated material always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows? Please advise.

            – Mico
            yesterday











          • Yes, @Mico. The 2nd column will always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows.

            – nanjun
            yesterday














          7












          7








          7







          The structure of your table is sufficiently unusual to warrant typesetting the contents of each cell as a separate custom, vertically centered tabular environment in its own right.



          In the following example, I define two such custom tabular-like environments:



          • mytabC, if the width of the tabular is supposed to equal the natural width of the cell's contents, and


          • mytabP, if the width of the tabular is supposed to be a fixed length -- say, the width of the contents of the corresponding header cell.


          In the following screenshot, the upper row employs mytabC for columns 1 and 2, and mytabP for the third column. The lower row employs mytabC for all 3 columns. I provide both types of solutions as it's not clear to me whether the midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell or if its width is supposed to be the natural width of the cell's contents.



          enter image description here



          documentclassIEEEtran
          usepackagebooktabs,amsmath,array,ragged2e
          %% Some housekeeping:
          newlengthmylen
          newcolumntypeP[1]>Centeringarraybackslashp#1
          %% Macros to generate two custom 'tabular' environments:
          newcommandmytabC[1]%
          begintabular[c]@ c @ #1 endtabular
          newcommandmytabP[2]settowidthmylen#1%
          begintabular[c]@ Pmylen @ #2 endtabular

          begindocument
          begintable
          captionarraystretch = 1
          centering

          begintabular@ccc@
          toprule
          No. & Equations & Current phasors\
          midrule
          mytabC1 &
          mytabC$begincases i_A=1\i_B=2\i_C=3 endcases$ &
          mytabPCurrent phasors1, 2, 3\ midrule 4, 5, 6\
          midrule
          mytabC2 &
          mytabC$begincases i_D=4\i_E=5\i_F=6 endcases$ &
          mytabC7, 8, 9\ midrule 0, 1, 2\
          bottomrule
          endtabular
          endtable
          enddocument





          share|improve this answer















          The structure of your table is sufficiently unusual to warrant typesetting the contents of each cell as a separate custom, vertically centered tabular environment in its own right.



          In the following example, I define two such custom tabular-like environments:



          • mytabC, if the width of the tabular is supposed to equal the natural width of the cell's contents, and


          • mytabP, if the width of the tabular is supposed to be a fixed length -- say, the width of the contents of the corresponding header cell.


          In the following screenshot, the upper row employs mytabC for columns 1 and 2, and mytabP for the third column. The lower row employs mytabC for all 3 columns. I provide both types of solutions as it's not clear to me whether the midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell or if its width is supposed to be the natural width of the cell's contents.



          enter image description here



          documentclassIEEEtran
          usepackagebooktabs,amsmath,array,ragged2e
          %% Some housekeeping:
          newlengthmylen
          newcolumntypeP[1]>Centeringarraybackslashp#1
          %% Macros to generate two custom 'tabular' environments:
          newcommandmytabC[1]%
          begintabular[c]@ c @ #1 endtabular
          newcommandmytabP[2]settowidthmylen#1%
          begintabular[c]@ Pmylen @ #2 endtabular

          begindocument
          begintable
          captionarraystretch = 1
          centering

          begintabular@ccc@
          toprule
          No. & Equations & Current phasors\
          midrule
          mytabC1 &
          mytabC$begincases i_A=1\i_B=2\i_C=3 endcases$ &
          mytabPCurrent phasors1, 2, 3\ midrule 4, 5, 6\
          midrule
          mytabC2 &
          mytabC$begincases i_D=4\i_E=5\i_F=6 endcases$ &
          mytabC7, 8, 9\ midrule 0, 1, 2\
          bottomrule
          endtabular
          endtable
          enddocument






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 6 at 21:57

























          answered May 6 at 21:31









          MicoMico

          290k32398786




          290k32398786












          • Thank you for the answer. In the last column, midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell. The cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered, is there a way to center those?

            – nanjun
            2 days ago











          • @nanjun - Thanks for this clarification. (You screenshots didn't hint at you requirement for the contents of the final column.) Real quick: Should the midrule in the final column always be centered vertically within the cell, or might there be cases where this isn't the case?

            – Mico
            2 days ago











          • Thank you again. The midrule in the last column would always be centered vertically within the larger cell. The smaller cell above and below the midrule also need to be vertically centered. Right now the row " No. 1" in your answer looks good except that the two samller cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered themselves. In other words, within each cell, no matter it is a small cell or large cell, the content are always meant to be vertically centered.

            – nanjun
            2 days ago












          • @nanjun - To solve your updated formatting requirements for the material in column 3, it would be really helpful to know what kind of material may be expected to occur in column 2. E.g., will this updated material always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows? Please advise.

            – Mico
            yesterday











          • Yes, @Mico. The 2nd column will always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows.

            – nanjun
            yesterday


















          • Thank you for the answer. In the last column, midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell. The cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered, is there a way to center those?

            – nanjun
            2 days ago











          • @nanjun - Thanks for this clarification. (You screenshots didn't hint at you requirement for the contents of the final column.) Real quick: Should the midrule in the final column always be centered vertically within the cell, or might there be cases where this isn't the case?

            – Mico
            2 days ago











          • Thank you again. The midrule in the last column would always be centered vertically within the larger cell. The smaller cell above and below the midrule also need to be vertically centered. Right now the row " No. 1" in your answer looks good except that the two samller cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered themselves. In other words, within each cell, no matter it is a small cell or large cell, the content are always meant to be vertically centered.

            – nanjun
            2 days ago












          • @nanjun - To solve your updated formatting requirements for the material in column 3, it would be really helpful to know what kind of material may be expected to occur in column 2. E.g., will this updated material always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows? Please advise.

            – Mico
            yesterday











          • Yes, @Mico. The 2nd column will always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows.

            – nanjun
            yesterday

















          Thank you for the answer. In the last column, midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell. The cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered, is there a way to center those?

          – nanjun
          2 days ago





          Thank you for the answer. In the last column, midrule is supposed to span the full width of the cell. The cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered, is there a way to center those?

          – nanjun
          2 days ago













          @nanjun - Thanks for this clarification. (You screenshots didn't hint at you requirement for the contents of the final column.) Real quick: Should the midrule in the final column always be centered vertically within the cell, or might there be cases where this isn't the case?

          – Mico
          2 days ago





          @nanjun - Thanks for this clarification. (You screenshots didn't hint at you requirement for the contents of the final column.) Real quick: Should the midrule in the final column always be centered vertically within the cell, or might there be cases where this isn't the case?

          – Mico
          2 days ago













          Thank you again. The midrule in the last column would always be centered vertically within the larger cell. The smaller cell above and below the midrule also need to be vertically centered. Right now the row " No. 1" in your answer looks good except that the two samller cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered themselves. In other words, within each cell, no matter it is a small cell or large cell, the content are always meant to be vertically centered.

          – nanjun
          2 days ago






          Thank you again. The midrule in the last column would always be centered vertically within the larger cell. The smaller cell above and below the midrule also need to be vertically centered. Right now the row " No. 1" in your answer looks good except that the two samller cells "1, 2, 3" and "4, 5, 6" are not vertically centered themselves. In other words, within each cell, no matter it is a small cell or large cell, the content are always meant to be vertically centered.

          – nanjun
          2 days ago














          @nanjun - To solve your updated formatting requirements for the material in column 3, it would be really helpful to know what kind of material may be expected to occur in column 2. E.g., will this updated material always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows? Please advise.

          – Mico
          yesterday





          @nanjun - To solve your updated formatting requirements for the material in column 3, it would be really helpful to know what kind of material may be expected to occur in column 2. E.g., will this updated material always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows? Please advise.

          – Mico
          yesterday













          Yes, @Mico. The 2nd column will always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows.

          – nanjun
          yesterday






          Yes, @Mico. The 2nd column will always consist of a cases environment with exactly 3 rows.

          – nanjun
          yesterday


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489489%2fhow-to-increase-row-height-of-a-table-and-vertically-align-middle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

          Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?