Clash between pgf and transparent packagesEnumerate and itemize undefined + captions not workingClash among packages?Unexpected clash between babel and pgf spyInterference between onslide and setbeamercoveredtransparentLatex already defined clash between cls file and multiple packagesPermanent “Undefined Control Sequence?”conflict between mathabx and other packagesTransparent text: what alternatives to the transparent package?torn paper problem compileIncompatibility between PGF and PStricks

Passing multiple files through stdin (over ssh)

Were Alexander the Great and Hephaestion lovers?

Where Mongol herds graze

How can this tool find out registered domains from an IP?

Should an arbiter claim draw at a K+R vs K+R endgame?

Grover algorithm for a database search: where is the quantum advantage?

Winning Strategy for the Magician and his Apprentice

How to hide an urban landmark?

System.StringException: Unexpected end of expression

Is it possible to have a wealthy country without middle class?

What ways have you found to get edits from non-LaTeX users?

What to do when surprise and a high initiative roll conflict with the narrative?

Logarithm of exponential

Prime Sieve and brute force

Share calendar details request from manager's manager

How come the nude protesters were not arrested?

Is it possible to 'live off the sea'

Is it a problem if <h4>, <h5> and <h6> are smaller than regular text?

What is the highest possible permanent AC at character creation?

Déjà vu, again?

Why didn't Voldemort recognize that Dumbledore was affected by his curse?

Someone whose aspirations exceed abilities or means

Did Milano or Benatar approve or comment on their namesake MCU ships?

Determining fair price for profitable mobile app business



Clash between pgf and transparent packages


Enumerate and itemize undefined + captions not workingClash among packages?Unexpected clash between babel and pgf spyInterference between onslide and setbeamercoveredtransparentLatex already defined clash between cls file and multiple packagesPermanent “Undefined Control Sequence?”conflict between mathabx and other packagesTransparent text: what alternatives to the transparent package?torn paper problem compileIncompatibility between PGF and PStricks













7















I get an error with the following MWE when using pdflatex.



documentclassarticle
usepackagepgfkeys, pgfcalendar
usepackagetransparent
begindocument
hello world
enddocument



! Undefined control sequence.

pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs ...urce@extgs@plain

#1



I can trace it back to input pgfutil-common.tex so it is not really pgfcalendar and seems like a general clash with pgf. Is this a bug? If so is it known and is there a work around. If not, which side is it on so I can report it.










share|improve this question




























    7















    I get an error with the following MWE when using pdflatex.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagepgfkeys, pgfcalendar
    usepackagetransparent
    begindocument
    hello world
    enddocument



    ! Undefined control sequence.

    pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs ...urce@extgs@plain

    #1



    I can trace it back to input pgfutil-common.tex so it is not really pgfcalendar and seems like a general clash with pgf. Is this a bug? If so is it known and is there a work around. If not, which side is it on so I can report it.










    share|improve this question


























      7












      7








      7


      1






      I get an error with the following MWE when using pdflatex.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackagepgfkeys, pgfcalendar
      usepackagetransparent
      begindocument
      hello world
      enddocument



      ! Undefined control sequence.

      pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs ...urce@extgs@plain

      #1



      I can trace it back to input pgfutil-common.tex so it is not really pgfcalendar and seems like a general clash with pgf. Is this a bug? If so is it known and is there a work around. If not, which side is it on so I can report it.










      share|improve this question
















      I get an error with the following MWE when using pdflatex.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackagepgfkeys, pgfcalendar
      usepackagetransparent
      begindocument
      hello world
      enddocument



      ! Undefined control sequence.

      pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs ...urce@extgs@plain

      #1



      I can trace it back to input pgfutil-common.tex so it is not really pgfcalendar and seems like a general clash with pgf. Is this a bug? If so is it known and is there a work around. If not, which side is it on so I can report it.







      tikz-pgf errors incompatibility transparency






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 30 at 2:06









      Phelype Oleinik

      29k64894




      29k64894










      asked May 30 at 0:36









      StrongBadStrongBad

      13.4k650107




      13.4k650107




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          I dare say the fault on in PGF's side, sorry if I'm wrong.



          The pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs which shows in the error message seems to be a generic macro which, with the current settings, expands to pgf@sys@addpdfresource@extgs@plain. The latter, however, is undefined. Searching the files for that macro, I found it in driver-specific definition code like pgfsys-pdftex.def and the like, which seems like it's not being loaded.



          I was going to say that loading pgfsys-pdftex.def (or pgfsys-luatex.def or pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def) manually solves the problem, however loading the driver code when one is using only pgfrcs (loaded by pgfcalendar, which causes the error) doesn't make much sense, so perhaps the way to go is to un-define pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs, so that transparent's code won't try to use it:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackagepgfkeys, pgfcalendar
          makeatletter
          AtBeginDocument%
          @ifundefinedpgf@sys@addpdfresource@extgs@plain%
          letpgfutil@addpdfresource@extgsSomethingProbablyUndefined
          makeatother
          usepackagetransparent
          begindocument
          hello transparent0.3world
          enddocument



          enter image description here




          Another way around, instead of loading the driver code manually, would be to load pgfsys (and graphicx, without which pgfsys apparently doesn't work):



          usepackagegraphicx
          usepackagepgfkeys, pgfsys, pgfcalendar





          share|improve this answer




















          • 2





            No it is not the fault of pgf but of the compability code in transparent: it tries to detect pgf to coordinate the pdf resources but the test is not quite correct if only a subpart of pgf is loaded. As we are currently working on the management of pdfresources this will stay until a real solution is there. See also github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/62

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 9:50











          • @UlrikeFischer so that would be it is known and I should just load more of pgf until things get fixed?

            – StrongBad
            May 30 at 10:45











          • I think it's strange for pgf to define the generic pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs in terms of a driver-specific macro which is undefined, but this is just my opinion. However the issue appeared after an update in transparent.sty, so...

            – Phelype Oleinik
            May 30 at 10:51











          • @PhelypeOleinik yes it is a bit strange, but it is an internal pgf command and it is not pgf's fault if transparent uses such an internal command wrongly.

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 11:27






          • 2





            As I wrote we are currently working in the pdfresources management and try to setup things so that tricks as transparent has to use now to coordinate the resources with pgf is no longer needed. This will mean changes in both packages so I don't see much sense to do some intermediate repairs now.

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 12:02











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493285%2fclash-between-pgf-and-transparent-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          I dare say the fault on in PGF's side, sorry if I'm wrong.



          The pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs which shows in the error message seems to be a generic macro which, with the current settings, expands to pgf@sys@addpdfresource@extgs@plain. The latter, however, is undefined. Searching the files for that macro, I found it in driver-specific definition code like pgfsys-pdftex.def and the like, which seems like it's not being loaded.



          I was going to say that loading pgfsys-pdftex.def (or pgfsys-luatex.def or pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def) manually solves the problem, however loading the driver code when one is using only pgfrcs (loaded by pgfcalendar, which causes the error) doesn't make much sense, so perhaps the way to go is to un-define pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs, so that transparent's code won't try to use it:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackagepgfkeys, pgfcalendar
          makeatletter
          AtBeginDocument%
          @ifundefinedpgf@sys@addpdfresource@extgs@plain%
          letpgfutil@addpdfresource@extgsSomethingProbablyUndefined
          makeatother
          usepackagetransparent
          begindocument
          hello transparent0.3world
          enddocument



          enter image description here




          Another way around, instead of loading the driver code manually, would be to load pgfsys (and graphicx, without which pgfsys apparently doesn't work):



          usepackagegraphicx
          usepackagepgfkeys, pgfsys, pgfcalendar





          share|improve this answer




















          • 2





            No it is not the fault of pgf but of the compability code in transparent: it tries to detect pgf to coordinate the pdf resources but the test is not quite correct if only a subpart of pgf is loaded. As we are currently working on the management of pdfresources this will stay until a real solution is there. See also github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/62

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 9:50











          • @UlrikeFischer so that would be it is known and I should just load more of pgf until things get fixed?

            – StrongBad
            May 30 at 10:45











          • I think it's strange for pgf to define the generic pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs in terms of a driver-specific macro which is undefined, but this is just my opinion. However the issue appeared after an update in transparent.sty, so...

            – Phelype Oleinik
            May 30 at 10:51











          • @PhelypeOleinik yes it is a bit strange, but it is an internal pgf command and it is not pgf's fault if transparent uses such an internal command wrongly.

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 11:27






          • 2





            As I wrote we are currently working in the pdfresources management and try to setup things so that tricks as transparent has to use now to coordinate the resources with pgf is no longer needed. This will mean changes in both packages so I don't see much sense to do some intermediate repairs now.

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 12:02















          7














          I dare say the fault on in PGF's side, sorry if I'm wrong.



          The pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs which shows in the error message seems to be a generic macro which, with the current settings, expands to pgf@sys@addpdfresource@extgs@plain. The latter, however, is undefined. Searching the files for that macro, I found it in driver-specific definition code like pgfsys-pdftex.def and the like, which seems like it's not being loaded.



          I was going to say that loading pgfsys-pdftex.def (or pgfsys-luatex.def or pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def) manually solves the problem, however loading the driver code when one is using only pgfrcs (loaded by pgfcalendar, which causes the error) doesn't make much sense, so perhaps the way to go is to un-define pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs, so that transparent's code won't try to use it:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackagepgfkeys, pgfcalendar
          makeatletter
          AtBeginDocument%
          @ifundefinedpgf@sys@addpdfresource@extgs@plain%
          letpgfutil@addpdfresource@extgsSomethingProbablyUndefined
          makeatother
          usepackagetransparent
          begindocument
          hello transparent0.3world
          enddocument



          enter image description here




          Another way around, instead of loading the driver code manually, would be to load pgfsys (and graphicx, without which pgfsys apparently doesn't work):



          usepackagegraphicx
          usepackagepgfkeys, pgfsys, pgfcalendar





          share|improve this answer




















          • 2





            No it is not the fault of pgf but of the compability code in transparent: it tries to detect pgf to coordinate the pdf resources but the test is not quite correct if only a subpart of pgf is loaded. As we are currently working on the management of pdfresources this will stay until a real solution is there. See also github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/62

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 9:50











          • @UlrikeFischer so that would be it is known and I should just load more of pgf until things get fixed?

            – StrongBad
            May 30 at 10:45











          • I think it's strange for pgf to define the generic pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs in terms of a driver-specific macro which is undefined, but this is just my opinion. However the issue appeared after an update in transparent.sty, so...

            – Phelype Oleinik
            May 30 at 10:51











          • @PhelypeOleinik yes it is a bit strange, but it is an internal pgf command and it is not pgf's fault if transparent uses such an internal command wrongly.

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 11:27






          • 2





            As I wrote we are currently working in the pdfresources management and try to setup things so that tricks as transparent has to use now to coordinate the resources with pgf is no longer needed. This will mean changes in both packages so I don't see much sense to do some intermediate repairs now.

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 12:02













          7












          7








          7







          I dare say the fault on in PGF's side, sorry if I'm wrong.



          The pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs which shows in the error message seems to be a generic macro which, with the current settings, expands to pgf@sys@addpdfresource@extgs@plain. The latter, however, is undefined. Searching the files for that macro, I found it in driver-specific definition code like pgfsys-pdftex.def and the like, which seems like it's not being loaded.



          I was going to say that loading pgfsys-pdftex.def (or pgfsys-luatex.def or pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def) manually solves the problem, however loading the driver code when one is using only pgfrcs (loaded by pgfcalendar, which causes the error) doesn't make much sense, so perhaps the way to go is to un-define pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs, so that transparent's code won't try to use it:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackagepgfkeys, pgfcalendar
          makeatletter
          AtBeginDocument%
          @ifundefinedpgf@sys@addpdfresource@extgs@plain%
          letpgfutil@addpdfresource@extgsSomethingProbablyUndefined
          makeatother
          usepackagetransparent
          begindocument
          hello transparent0.3world
          enddocument



          enter image description here




          Another way around, instead of loading the driver code manually, would be to load pgfsys (and graphicx, without which pgfsys apparently doesn't work):



          usepackagegraphicx
          usepackagepgfkeys, pgfsys, pgfcalendar





          share|improve this answer















          I dare say the fault on in PGF's side, sorry if I'm wrong.



          The pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs which shows in the error message seems to be a generic macro which, with the current settings, expands to pgf@sys@addpdfresource@extgs@plain. The latter, however, is undefined. Searching the files for that macro, I found it in driver-specific definition code like pgfsys-pdftex.def and the like, which seems like it's not being loaded.



          I was going to say that loading pgfsys-pdftex.def (or pgfsys-luatex.def or pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def) manually solves the problem, however loading the driver code when one is using only pgfrcs (loaded by pgfcalendar, which causes the error) doesn't make much sense, so perhaps the way to go is to un-define pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs, so that transparent's code won't try to use it:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackagepgfkeys, pgfcalendar
          makeatletter
          AtBeginDocument%
          @ifundefinedpgf@sys@addpdfresource@extgs@plain%
          letpgfutil@addpdfresource@extgsSomethingProbablyUndefined
          makeatother
          usepackagetransparent
          begindocument
          hello transparent0.3world
          enddocument



          enter image description here




          Another way around, instead of loading the driver code manually, would be to load pgfsys (and graphicx, without which pgfsys apparently doesn't work):



          usepackagegraphicx
          usepackagepgfkeys, pgfsys, pgfcalendar






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 30 at 2:35

























          answered May 30 at 1:36









          Phelype OleinikPhelype Oleinik

          29k64894




          29k64894







          • 2





            No it is not the fault of pgf but of the compability code in transparent: it tries to detect pgf to coordinate the pdf resources but the test is not quite correct if only a subpart of pgf is loaded. As we are currently working on the management of pdfresources this will stay until a real solution is there. See also github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/62

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 9:50











          • @UlrikeFischer so that would be it is known and I should just load more of pgf until things get fixed?

            – StrongBad
            May 30 at 10:45











          • I think it's strange for pgf to define the generic pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs in terms of a driver-specific macro which is undefined, but this is just my opinion. However the issue appeared after an update in transparent.sty, so...

            – Phelype Oleinik
            May 30 at 10:51











          • @PhelypeOleinik yes it is a bit strange, but it is an internal pgf command and it is not pgf's fault if transparent uses such an internal command wrongly.

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 11:27






          • 2





            As I wrote we are currently working in the pdfresources management and try to setup things so that tricks as transparent has to use now to coordinate the resources with pgf is no longer needed. This will mean changes in both packages so I don't see much sense to do some intermediate repairs now.

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 12:02












          • 2





            No it is not the fault of pgf but of the compability code in transparent: it tries to detect pgf to coordinate the pdf resources but the test is not quite correct if only a subpart of pgf is loaded. As we are currently working on the management of pdfresources this will stay until a real solution is there. See also github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/62

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 9:50











          • @UlrikeFischer so that would be it is known and I should just load more of pgf until things get fixed?

            – StrongBad
            May 30 at 10:45











          • I think it's strange for pgf to define the generic pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs in terms of a driver-specific macro which is undefined, but this is just my opinion. However the issue appeared after an update in transparent.sty, so...

            – Phelype Oleinik
            May 30 at 10:51











          • @PhelypeOleinik yes it is a bit strange, but it is an internal pgf command and it is not pgf's fault if transparent uses such an internal command wrongly.

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 11:27






          • 2





            As I wrote we are currently working in the pdfresources management and try to setup things so that tricks as transparent has to use now to coordinate the resources with pgf is no longer needed. This will mean changes in both packages so I don't see much sense to do some intermediate repairs now.

            – Ulrike Fischer
            May 30 at 12:02







          2




          2





          No it is not the fault of pgf but of the compability code in transparent: it tries to detect pgf to coordinate the pdf resources but the test is not quite correct if only a subpart of pgf is loaded. As we are currently working on the management of pdfresources this will stay until a real solution is there. See also github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/62

          – Ulrike Fischer
          May 30 at 9:50





          No it is not the fault of pgf but of the compability code in transparent: it tries to detect pgf to coordinate the pdf resources but the test is not quite correct if only a subpart of pgf is loaded. As we are currently working on the management of pdfresources this will stay until a real solution is there. See also github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/62

          – Ulrike Fischer
          May 30 at 9:50













          @UlrikeFischer so that would be it is known and I should just load more of pgf until things get fixed?

          – StrongBad
          May 30 at 10:45





          @UlrikeFischer so that would be it is known and I should just load more of pgf until things get fixed?

          – StrongBad
          May 30 at 10:45













          I think it's strange for pgf to define the generic pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs in terms of a driver-specific macro which is undefined, but this is just my opinion. However the issue appeared after an update in transparent.sty, so...

          – Phelype Oleinik
          May 30 at 10:51





          I think it's strange for pgf to define the generic pgfutil@addpdfresource@extgs in terms of a driver-specific macro which is undefined, but this is just my opinion. However the issue appeared after an update in transparent.sty, so...

          – Phelype Oleinik
          May 30 at 10:51













          @PhelypeOleinik yes it is a bit strange, but it is an internal pgf command and it is not pgf's fault if transparent uses such an internal command wrongly.

          – Ulrike Fischer
          May 30 at 11:27





          @PhelypeOleinik yes it is a bit strange, but it is an internal pgf command and it is not pgf's fault if transparent uses such an internal command wrongly.

          – Ulrike Fischer
          May 30 at 11:27




          2




          2





          As I wrote we are currently working in the pdfresources management and try to setup things so that tricks as transparent has to use now to coordinate the resources with pgf is no longer needed. This will mean changes in both packages so I don't see much sense to do some intermediate repairs now.

          – Ulrike Fischer
          May 30 at 12:02





          As I wrote we are currently working in the pdfresources management and try to setup things so that tricks as transparent has to use now to coordinate the resources with pgf is no longer needed. This will mean changes in both packages so I don't see much sense to do some intermediate repairs now.

          – Ulrike Fischer
          May 30 at 12:02

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493285%2fclash-between-pgf-and-transparent-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

          Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?