Do I add my ability modifier to the damage of the bonus-action attack granted by the Crossbow Expert feat?Does the offhand attack from Crossbow Expert get a Dex bonus?Does the double-bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?What function does the “light” weapon property serve on the hand crossbow?How do you load a hand crossbow?Extra Attack, Crossbow Expert, and hand crossbow: 4 shots per turn?Crossbow Expert feat second clause clarificationDo monks add their ability modifier to their additional attacks?Crossbow Expert + Mobile FeatCrossbow Expert Feat… for Spells?Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?Does Crossbow Expert let me fire a hand crossbow as a bonus action after using a one-handed weapon's versatile property?Can you attack multiple times a turn with a light/heavy crossbow and the Crossbow Expert feat?

Would the US government be able to hold control if all electronics were disabled for an indefinite amount of time?

Impedance ratio vs. SWR

Cycle through MeshStyle directives in ListLinePlot

This riddle is not to see but to solve

What can I, as a user, do about offensive reviews in App Store?

PhD - Well known professor or well known school?

Recommended tools for graphs and charts

Mathematically, why does mass matrix / load vector lumping work?

Does the spell Clone require any material components to cast on a Zealot barbarian?

Where Mongol herds graze

Is counterpoint still used today?

SQL counting distinct over partition

What's up with this leaf?

Did Milano or Benatar approve or comment on their namesake MCU ships?

Pre-1972 sci-fi short story or novel: alien(?) tunnel where people try new moves and get destroyed if they're not the correct ones

How to hide an urban landmark?

Does Disney no longer produce hand-drawn cartoon films?

How can I get an unreasonable manager to approve time off?

How to draw this diagram with tikzcd or other packages

Were Alexander the Great and Hephaestion lovers?

Are there downsides to using std::string as a buffer?

Inward extrusion is not working

bash script: "*.jpg" expansion not working as expected inside $(...), for picking a random file

What is the highest possible temporary AC at level 1, without any help from others?



Do I add my ability modifier to the damage of the bonus-action attack granted by the Crossbow Expert feat?


Does the offhand attack from Crossbow Expert get a Dex bonus?Does the double-bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?What function does the “light” weapon property serve on the hand crossbow?How do you load a hand crossbow?Extra Attack, Crossbow Expert, and hand crossbow: 4 shots per turn?Crossbow Expert feat second clause clarificationDo monks add their ability modifier to their additional attacks?Crossbow Expert + Mobile FeatCrossbow Expert Feat… for Spells?Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?Does Crossbow Expert let me fire a hand crossbow as a bonus action after using a one-handed weapon's versatile property?Can you attack multiple times a turn with a light/heavy crossbow and the Crossbow Expert feat?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








14












$begingroup$


The Two-Weapon Fighting rule says:




When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus
attack, unless that modifier is negative.



If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon,
instead of making a melee attack with it.




With Two-Weapon Fighting, I can only add my ability modifier to the damage of the first attack. Even if I get the Dual Wielder feat (PHB, p. 165), it doesn't say anything about adding the ability score to the damage.



The Crossbow Expert feat (PHB, p. 165) says:




Thanks to extensive practice with the crossbow, you gain the following
benefits:



  • You ignore the loading quality of crossbows with which you are proficient.

  • Being within 5 feet of a hostile creature doesn’t impose disadvantage
    on your ranged attack rolls.

  • When you use the Attack action and attack with a one-handed weapon,
    you can use a bonus action to attack with a loaded hand crossbow you
    are holding.



When I attack using the bonus action granted by Crossbow Expert, do I add my ability modifier to the damage? I don't know whether I should follow the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, or roll damage as for a normal weapon attack.










share|improve this question









New contributor



lastrogue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
    $endgroup$
    – Oblivious Sage
    May 30 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:23










  • $begingroup$
    Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:24











  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
    $endgroup$
    – Tiggerous
    May 30 at 7:32

















14












$begingroup$


The Two-Weapon Fighting rule says:




When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus
attack, unless that modifier is negative.



If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon,
instead of making a melee attack with it.




With Two-Weapon Fighting, I can only add my ability modifier to the damage of the first attack. Even if I get the Dual Wielder feat (PHB, p. 165), it doesn't say anything about adding the ability score to the damage.



The Crossbow Expert feat (PHB, p. 165) says:




Thanks to extensive practice with the crossbow, you gain the following
benefits:



  • You ignore the loading quality of crossbows with which you are proficient.

  • Being within 5 feet of a hostile creature doesn’t impose disadvantage
    on your ranged attack rolls.

  • When you use the Attack action and attack with a one-handed weapon,
    you can use a bonus action to attack with a loaded hand crossbow you
    are holding.



When I attack using the bonus action granted by Crossbow Expert, do I add my ability modifier to the damage? I don't know whether I should follow the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, or roll damage as for a normal weapon attack.










share|improve this question









New contributor



lastrogue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
    $endgroup$
    – Oblivious Sage
    May 30 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:23










  • $begingroup$
    Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:24











  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
    $endgroup$
    – Tiggerous
    May 30 at 7:32













14












14








14





$begingroup$


The Two-Weapon Fighting rule says:




When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus
attack, unless that modifier is negative.



If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon,
instead of making a melee attack with it.




With Two-Weapon Fighting, I can only add my ability modifier to the damage of the first attack. Even if I get the Dual Wielder feat (PHB, p. 165), it doesn't say anything about adding the ability score to the damage.



The Crossbow Expert feat (PHB, p. 165) says:




Thanks to extensive practice with the crossbow, you gain the following
benefits:



  • You ignore the loading quality of crossbows with which you are proficient.

  • Being within 5 feet of a hostile creature doesn’t impose disadvantage
    on your ranged attack rolls.

  • When you use the Attack action and attack with a one-handed weapon,
    you can use a bonus action to attack with a loaded hand crossbow you
    are holding.



When I attack using the bonus action granted by Crossbow Expert, do I add my ability modifier to the damage? I don't know whether I should follow the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, or roll damage as for a normal weapon attack.










share|improve this question









New contributor



lastrogue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




The Two-Weapon Fighting rule says:




When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus
attack, unless that modifier is negative.



If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon,
instead of making a melee attack with it.




With Two-Weapon Fighting, I can only add my ability modifier to the damage of the first attack. Even if I get the Dual Wielder feat (PHB, p. 165), it doesn't say anything about adding the ability score to the damage.



The Crossbow Expert feat (PHB, p. 165) says:




Thanks to extensive practice with the crossbow, you gain the following
benefits:



  • You ignore the loading quality of crossbows with which you are proficient.

  • Being within 5 feet of a hostile creature doesn’t impose disadvantage
    on your ranged attack rolls.

  • When you use the Attack action and attack with a one-handed weapon,
    you can use a bonus action to attack with a loaded hand crossbow you
    are holding.



When I attack using the bonus action granted by Crossbow Expert, do I add my ability modifier to the damage? I don't know whether I should follow the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, or roll damage as for a normal weapon attack.







dnd-5e feats damage attack






share|improve this question









New contributor



lastrogue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



lastrogue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 30 at 5:13









V2Blast

30.2k5110183




30.2k5110183






New contributor



lastrogue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked May 30 at 2:35









lastroguelastrogue

735




735




New contributor



lastrogue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




lastrogue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
    $endgroup$
    – Oblivious Sage
    May 30 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:23










  • $begingroup$
    Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:24











  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
    $endgroup$
    – Tiggerous
    May 30 at 7:32












  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
    $endgroup$
    – Oblivious Sage
    May 30 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:23










  • $begingroup$
    Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:24











  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
    $endgroup$
    – Tiggerous
    May 30 at 7:32







6




6




$begingroup$
Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
$endgroup$
– Oblivious Sage
May 30 at 2:38




$begingroup$
Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
$endgroup$
– Oblivious Sage
May 30 at 2:38




1




1




$begingroup$
Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 30 at 5:23




$begingroup$
Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 30 at 5:23












$begingroup$
Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 30 at 5:24





$begingroup$
Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 30 at 5:24













$begingroup$
Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
$endgroup$
– Tiggerous
May 30 at 7:32




$begingroup$
Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
$endgroup$
– Tiggerous
May 30 at 7:32










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















18












$begingroup$

You can add your ability modifier to damage from the bonus action attack



The general rule for damage rolls is:




When attacking with a weapon, you add your ability modifier--the same modifier used for the attack roll--to the damage.




In short: You can add your ability modifier to your crossbow attack because nothing tells you that you cannot.



Unofficial guidance from Jeremy Crawford (5e's lead rules designer), which some may consider authoritative, agrees with this interpretation:




When making a weapon attack, you add your ability modifier to the damage, unless a feature tells you not to.




So far, so good.



But, does this rule for two-weapon fighting, which also grants a bonus action, confuse matters?




You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




Dont worry - this rule can be safely ignored. The bonus action granted by the Crossbow Expert feat is not the same as the bonus action granted by two-weapon fighting. Thus the two-weapon fighting rules are completely irrelevant to your situation.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
    $endgroup$
    – Zibbobz
    May 30 at 13:16


















10












$begingroup$

Yes, because it's not Two-Weapon Fighting.



As you correctly point out, the rules for using a hand crossbow with Crossbow Expert don't mention losing out on your stat bonus. Since using your off-hand crossbow in this way doesn't actually use the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, you don't need to refer to them at all when using Crossbow Expert.



Since Crossbow Expert effectively gives you an entirely new way of spending your bonus action to attack, you get your full ability modifier to damage.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    The other answers are correct but they fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons. The only way that the rules for dual weapon could apply to your hand crossbow would be if you swung the crossbow itself at somebody as an improvised club.



    So long as you are using the crossbow as a ranged weapon to fire crossbow bolts at enemies, the 2 weapon style rule does not apply and you only need to worry about the rules of the feat that allows you to fire it as a bonus action.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
      $endgroup$
      – krb
      May 30 at 14:55






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      May 30 at 15:18











    • $begingroup$
      I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
      $endgroup$
      – krb
      May 30 at 15:32






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      May 30 at 15:33







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
      $endgroup$
      – V2Blast
      May 30 at 22:07












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    lastrogue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148963%2fdo-i-add-my-ability-modifier-to-the-damage-of-the-bonus-action-attack-granted-by%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    18












    $begingroup$

    You can add your ability modifier to damage from the bonus action attack



    The general rule for damage rolls is:




    When attacking with a weapon, you add your ability modifier--the same modifier used for the attack roll--to the damage.




    In short: You can add your ability modifier to your crossbow attack because nothing tells you that you cannot.



    Unofficial guidance from Jeremy Crawford (5e's lead rules designer), which some may consider authoritative, agrees with this interpretation:




    When making a weapon attack, you add your ability modifier to the damage, unless a feature tells you not to.




    So far, so good.



    But, does this rule for two-weapon fighting, which also grants a bonus action, confuse matters?




    You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




    Dont worry - this rule can be safely ignored. The bonus action granted by the Crossbow Expert feat is not the same as the bonus action granted by two-weapon fighting. Thus the two-weapon fighting rules are completely irrelevant to your situation.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
      $endgroup$
      – Zibbobz
      May 30 at 13:16















    18












    $begingroup$

    You can add your ability modifier to damage from the bonus action attack



    The general rule for damage rolls is:




    When attacking with a weapon, you add your ability modifier--the same modifier used for the attack roll--to the damage.




    In short: You can add your ability modifier to your crossbow attack because nothing tells you that you cannot.



    Unofficial guidance from Jeremy Crawford (5e's lead rules designer), which some may consider authoritative, agrees with this interpretation:




    When making a weapon attack, you add your ability modifier to the damage, unless a feature tells you not to.




    So far, so good.



    But, does this rule for two-weapon fighting, which also grants a bonus action, confuse matters?




    You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




    Dont worry - this rule can be safely ignored. The bonus action granted by the Crossbow Expert feat is not the same as the bonus action granted by two-weapon fighting. Thus the two-weapon fighting rules are completely irrelevant to your situation.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
      $endgroup$
      – Zibbobz
      May 30 at 13:16













    18












    18








    18





    $begingroup$

    You can add your ability modifier to damage from the bonus action attack



    The general rule for damage rolls is:




    When attacking with a weapon, you add your ability modifier--the same modifier used for the attack roll--to the damage.




    In short: You can add your ability modifier to your crossbow attack because nothing tells you that you cannot.



    Unofficial guidance from Jeremy Crawford (5e's lead rules designer), which some may consider authoritative, agrees with this interpretation:




    When making a weapon attack, you add your ability modifier to the damage, unless a feature tells you not to.




    So far, so good.



    But, does this rule for two-weapon fighting, which also grants a bonus action, confuse matters?




    You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




    Dont worry - this rule can be safely ignored. The bonus action granted by the Crossbow Expert feat is not the same as the bonus action granted by two-weapon fighting. Thus the two-weapon fighting rules are completely irrelevant to your situation.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    You can add your ability modifier to damage from the bonus action attack



    The general rule for damage rolls is:




    When attacking with a weapon, you add your ability modifier--the same modifier used for the attack roll--to the damage.




    In short: You can add your ability modifier to your crossbow attack because nothing tells you that you cannot.



    Unofficial guidance from Jeremy Crawford (5e's lead rules designer), which some may consider authoritative, agrees with this interpretation:




    When making a weapon attack, you add your ability modifier to the damage, unless a feature tells you not to.




    So far, so good.



    But, does this rule for two-weapon fighting, which also grants a bonus action, confuse matters?




    You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




    Dont worry - this rule can be safely ignored. The bonus action granted by the Crossbow Expert feat is not the same as the bonus action granted by two-weapon fighting. Thus the two-weapon fighting rules are completely irrelevant to your situation.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 30 at 10:59

























    answered May 30 at 7:06









    TiggerousTiggerous

    11.7k45292




    11.7k45292







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
      $endgroup$
      – Zibbobz
      May 30 at 13:16












    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
      $endgroup$
      – Zibbobz
      May 30 at 13:16







    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
    $endgroup$
    – Zibbobz
    May 30 at 13:16




    $begingroup$
    This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
    $endgroup$
    – Zibbobz
    May 30 at 13:16













    10












    $begingroup$

    Yes, because it's not Two-Weapon Fighting.



    As you correctly point out, the rules for using a hand crossbow with Crossbow Expert don't mention losing out on your stat bonus. Since using your off-hand crossbow in this way doesn't actually use the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, you don't need to refer to them at all when using Crossbow Expert.



    Since Crossbow Expert effectively gives you an entirely new way of spending your bonus action to attack, you get your full ability modifier to damage.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      10












      $begingroup$

      Yes, because it's not Two-Weapon Fighting.



      As you correctly point out, the rules for using a hand crossbow with Crossbow Expert don't mention losing out on your stat bonus. Since using your off-hand crossbow in this way doesn't actually use the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, you don't need to refer to them at all when using Crossbow Expert.



      Since Crossbow Expert effectively gives you an entirely new way of spending your bonus action to attack, you get your full ability modifier to damage.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        10












        10








        10





        $begingroup$

        Yes, because it's not Two-Weapon Fighting.



        As you correctly point out, the rules for using a hand crossbow with Crossbow Expert don't mention losing out on your stat bonus. Since using your off-hand crossbow in this way doesn't actually use the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, you don't need to refer to them at all when using Crossbow Expert.



        Since Crossbow Expert effectively gives you an entirely new way of spending your bonus action to attack, you get your full ability modifier to damage.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Yes, because it's not Two-Weapon Fighting.



        As you correctly point out, the rules for using a hand crossbow with Crossbow Expert don't mention losing out on your stat bonus. Since using your off-hand crossbow in this way doesn't actually use the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, you don't need to refer to them at all when using Crossbow Expert.



        Since Crossbow Expert effectively gives you an entirely new way of spending your bonus action to attack, you get your full ability modifier to damage.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 30 at 7:02









        DuckTapeAlDuckTapeAl

        39.1k9134229




        39.1k9134229





















            1












            $begingroup$

            The other answers are correct but they fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons. The only way that the rules for dual weapon could apply to your hand crossbow would be if you swung the crossbow itself at somebody as an improvised club.



            So long as you are using the crossbow as a ranged weapon to fire crossbow bolts at enemies, the 2 weapon style rule does not apply and you only need to worry about the rules of the feat that allows you to fire it as a bonus action.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 14:55






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:18











            • $begingroup$
              I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 15:32






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:33







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              May 30 at 22:07
















            1












            $begingroup$

            The other answers are correct but they fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons. The only way that the rules for dual weapon could apply to your hand crossbow would be if you swung the crossbow itself at somebody as an improvised club.



            So long as you are using the crossbow as a ranged weapon to fire crossbow bolts at enemies, the 2 weapon style rule does not apply and you only need to worry about the rules of the feat that allows you to fire it as a bonus action.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 14:55






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:18











            • $begingroup$
              I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 15:32






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:33







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              May 30 at 22:07














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            The other answers are correct but they fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons. The only way that the rules for dual weapon could apply to your hand crossbow would be if you swung the crossbow itself at somebody as an improvised club.



            So long as you are using the crossbow as a ranged weapon to fire crossbow bolts at enemies, the 2 weapon style rule does not apply and you only need to worry about the rules of the feat that allows you to fire it as a bonus action.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The other answers are correct but they fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons. The only way that the rules for dual weapon could apply to your hand crossbow would be if you swung the crossbow itself at somebody as an improvised club.



            So long as you are using the crossbow as a ranged weapon to fire crossbow bolts at enemies, the 2 weapon style rule does not apply and you only need to worry about the rules of the feat that allows you to fire it as a bonus action.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 30 at 14:03









            krbkrb

            2,212415




            2,212415











            • $begingroup$
              I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 14:55






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:18











            • $begingroup$
              I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 15:32






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:33







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              May 30 at 22:07

















            • $begingroup$
              I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 14:55






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:18











            • $begingroup$
              I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 15:32






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:33







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              May 30 at 22:07
















            $begingroup$
            I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
            $endgroup$
            – krb
            May 30 at 14:55




            $begingroup$
            I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
            $endgroup$
            – krb
            May 30 at 14:55




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            May 30 at 15:18





            $begingroup$
            I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            May 30 at 15:18













            $begingroup$
            I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
            $endgroup$
            – krb
            May 30 at 15:32




            $begingroup$
            I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
            $endgroup$
            – krb
            May 30 at 15:32




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            May 30 at 15:33





            $begingroup$
            DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            May 30 at 15:33





            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            May 30 at 22:07





            $begingroup$
            "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            May 30 at 22:07











            lastrogue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            lastrogue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            lastrogue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            lastrogue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148963%2fdo-i-add-my-ability-modifier-to-the-damage-of-the-bonus-action-attack-granted-by%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?