File globbing pattern, !(*example), behaves differently in bash script than it does in bash shellautomatically load shell scripts from /usr/binExtended file globbing not working with cat inside bash scriptcan something besides the shebang set the interpreter?How to prevent the caller's shell from being used in sudoUsing a variable to execute a curl commandUse asterisk in variablesparallel processing reading from a file in a loopBash interactive - entire script writing to historyHow to write a shell script using terminal?bash in Windows behaves differently than bash in Linux

Pronoun introduced before its antecedent

Movie where a boy is transported into the future by an alien spaceship

What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?

How can this map be coloured using four colours?

Completing the square to find if quadratic form is positive definite.

What is the right way to float a home lab?

Why don’t airliners have temporary liveries?

Accidentally renamed tar.gz file to a non tar.gz file, will my file be messed up

Can a 2nd-level sorcerer use sorcery points to create a 2nd-level spell slot?

How would you say “AKA/as in”?

How can drunken, homicidal elves successfully conduct a wild hunt?

Traffic law UK, pedestrians

What happened to all the nuclear material being smuggled after the fall of the USSR?

How do I calculate APR from monthly instalments?

Did Darth Vader wear the same suit for 20+ years?

Word for a small burst of laughter that can't be held back

Bent spoke design wheels — feasible?

How to pass a regex when finding a directory path in bash?

How is TD(0) method helpful? What good does it do?

Are the AT-AT's from "Empire Strikes Back" a deliberate reference to Mecha?

How could a government be implemented in a virtual reality?

Pay as you go Or Oyster card

How can I instantiate a lambda closure type in C++11/14?

Credit card offering 0.5 miles for every cent rounded up. Too good to be true?



File globbing pattern, !(*example), behaves differently in bash script than it does in bash shell


automatically load shell scripts from /usr/binExtended file globbing not working with cat inside bash scriptcan something besides the shebang set the interpreter?How to prevent the caller's shell from being used in sudoUsing a variable to execute a curl commandUse asterisk in variablesparallel processing reading from a file in a loopBash interactive - entire script writing to historyHow to write a shell script using terminal?bash in Windows behaves differently than bash in Linux






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5















The following works when pasted directly into my bash terminal (I call bash explicitly, bash version: 4.4.19(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu))



for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "$filename"
done


This command echoes back all of the txt files that do not have 'example' in the filename.



But when I convert this into a script called temp.sh, chmod +x temp.sh and call it by ./temp.sh:



#!/usr/bin/env bash

for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "$filename"
done



I get the following error:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ ./temp.sh 
./temp.sh: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
./temp.sh: line 3: `for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do'


I fail to understand the problem here. Why is it doing exactly what I want in the shell but not in the script.



Edit (to answer panki's question):



The difference between when env is called in shell/terminal and when env is called in shell/script:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ diff example_myshell.txt example_called_script.txt 
5a6
> _=/usr/bin/env
36,37d36
< TERM=xterm-256color
< SHELL=/bin/bash
38a38,39
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> TERM=xterm-256color
45c46
< PYENV_SHELL=bash
---
> SHLVL=4
47c48
< SHLVL=3
---
> PYENV_SHELL=bash
61d61
< _=/usr/bin/env










share|improve this question
























  • Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

    – Panki
    May 27 at 9:56











  • Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

    – Dean Kayton
    May 27 at 10:03

















5















The following works when pasted directly into my bash terminal (I call bash explicitly, bash version: 4.4.19(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu))



for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "$filename"
done


This command echoes back all of the txt files that do not have 'example' in the filename.



But when I convert this into a script called temp.sh, chmod +x temp.sh and call it by ./temp.sh:



#!/usr/bin/env bash

for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "$filename"
done



I get the following error:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ ./temp.sh 
./temp.sh: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
./temp.sh: line 3: `for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do'


I fail to understand the problem here. Why is it doing exactly what I want in the shell but not in the script.



Edit (to answer panki's question):



The difference between when env is called in shell/terminal and when env is called in shell/script:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ diff example_myshell.txt example_called_script.txt 
5a6
> _=/usr/bin/env
36,37d36
< TERM=xterm-256color
< SHELL=/bin/bash
38a38,39
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> TERM=xterm-256color
45c46
< PYENV_SHELL=bash
---
> SHLVL=4
47c48
< SHLVL=3
---
> PYENV_SHELL=bash
61d61
< _=/usr/bin/env










share|improve this question
























  • Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

    – Panki
    May 27 at 9:56











  • Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

    – Dean Kayton
    May 27 at 10:03













5












5








5








The following works when pasted directly into my bash terminal (I call bash explicitly, bash version: 4.4.19(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu))



for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "$filename"
done


This command echoes back all of the txt files that do not have 'example' in the filename.



But when I convert this into a script called temp.sh, chmod +x temp.sh and call it by ./temp.sh:



#!/usr/bin/env bash

for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "$filename"
done



I get the following error:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ ./temp.sh 
./temp.sh: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
./temp.sh: line 3: `for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do'


I fail to understand the problem here. Why is it doing exactly what I want in the shell but not in the script.



Edit (to answer panki's question):



The difference between when env is called in shell/terminal and when env is called in shell/script:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ diff example_myshell.txt example_called_script.txt 
5a6
> _=/usr/bin/env
36,37d36
< TERM=xterm-256color
< SHELL=/bin/bash
38a38,39
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> TERM=xterm-256color
45c46
< PYENV_SHELL=bash
---
> SHLVL=4
47c48
< SHLVL=3
---
> PYENV_SHELL=bash
61d61
< _=/usr/bin/env










share|improve this question
















The following works when pasted directly into my bash terminal (I call bash explicitly, bash version: 4.4.19(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu))



for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "$filename"
done


This command echoes back all of the txt files that do not have 'example' in the filename.



But when I convert this into a script called temp.sh, chmod +x temp.sh and call it by ./temp.sh:



#!/usr/bin/env bash

for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "$filename"
done



I get the following error:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ ./temp.sh 
./temp.sh: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
./temp.sh: line 3: `for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do'


I fail to understand the problem here. Why is it doing exactly what I want in the shell but not in the script.



Edit (to answer panki's question):



The difference between when env is called in shell/terminal and when env is called in shell/script:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ diff example_myshell.txt example_called_script.txt 
5a6
> _=/usr/bin/env
36,37d36
< TERM=xterm-256color
< SHELL=/bin/bash
38a38,39
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> TERM=xterm-256color
45c46
< PYENV_SHELL=bash
---
> SHLVL=4
47c48
< SHLVL=3
---
> PYENV_SHELL=bash
61d61
< _=/usr/bin/env







bash shell-script wildcards bash-expansion






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 27 at 10:04







Dean Kayton

















asked May 27 at 9:53









Dean KaytonDean Kayton

414




414












  • Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

    – Panki
    May 27 at 9:56











  • Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

    – Dean Kayton
    May 27 at 10:03

















  • Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

    – Panki
    May 27 at 9:56











  • Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

    – Dean Kayton
    May 27 at 10:03
















Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

– Panki
May 27 at 9:56





Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

– Panki
May 27 at 9:56













Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

– Dean Kayton
May 27 at 10:03





Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

– Dean Kayton
May 27 at 10:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















12














The !(...) Korn shell extended operator is only available in bash when you turn the extglob option on (it is off by default).



You may have extglob turned on in your interactive shell via ~/.bashrc or other initialization file, but notice that those files are not sourced when running scripts, and that option is not inherited from the calling shell (unless the BASHOPTS variable in the environment, but it would be a bad idea to have it there).



Explicitly turning it on with



shopt -s extglob


at the beginning of your script should work.



Notice that the shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line which wasn't already parsed. This means that you cannot use shopt -s extglob like set -f, to only turn the extended patterns on in a subshell:



# this won't work
(
shopt -s extglob
echo !(no such file)
)


You'd have to do something like:



(
shopt -s extglob
eval 'echo !(no such file)'
)





share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    @DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case $f##*/ in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    May 27 at 10:16












  • I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 28 at 8:40






  • 1





    That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 8:52











  • Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b2,3(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 9:19












  • Commenting on the latest edit, the final paragraph. I think I put it in a function (immediately before the place where I needed its functionality applied. Would that explain why it did not work? Because the function already got parsed as a whole?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 29 at 7:18











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f521287%2ffile-globbing-pattern-example-behaves-differently-in-bash-script-than-it-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12














The !(...) Korn shell extended operator is only available in bash when you turn the extglob option on (it is off by default).



You may have extglob turned on in your interactive shell via ~/.bashrc or other initialization file, but notice that those files are not sourced when running scripts, and that option is not inherited from the calling shell (unless the BASHOPTS variable in the environment, but it would be a bad idea to have it there).



Explicitly turning it on with



shopt -s extglob


at the beginning of your script should work.



Notice that the shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line which wasn't already parsed. This means that you cannot use shopt -s extglob like set -f, to only turn the extended patterns on in a subshell:



# this won't work
(
shopt -s extglob
echo !(no such file)
)


You'd have to do something like:



(
shopt -s extglob
eval 'echo !(no such file)'
)





share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    @DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case $f##*/ in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    May 27 at 10:16












  • I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 28 at 8:40






  • 1





    That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 8:52











  • Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b2,3(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 9:19












  • Commenting on the latest edit, the final paragraph. I think I put it in a function (immediately before the place where I needed its functionality applied. Would that explain why it did not work? Because the function already got parsed as a whole?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 29 at 7:18















12














The !(...) Korn shell extended operator is only available in bash when you turn the extglob option on (it is off by default).



You may have extglob turned on in your interactive shell via ~/.bashrc or other initialization file, but notice that those files are not sourced when running scripts, and that option is not inherited from the calling shell (unless the BASHOPTS variable in the environment, but it would be a bad idea to have it there).



Explicitly turning it on with



shopt -s extglob


at the beginning of your script should work.



Notice that the shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line which wasn't already parsed. This means that you cannot use shopt -s extglob like set -f, to only turn the extended patterns on in a subshell:



# this won't work
(
shopt -s extglob
echo !(no such file)
)


You'd have to do something like:



(
shopt -s extglob
eval 'echo !(no such file)'
)





share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    @DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case $f##*/ in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    May 27 at 10:16












  • I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 28 at 8:40






  • 1





    That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 8:52











  • Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b2,3(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 9:19












  • Commenting on the latest edit, the final paragraph. I think I put it in a function (immediately before the place where I needed its functionality applied. Would that explain why it did not work? Because the function already got parsed as a whole?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 29 at 7:18













12












12








12







The !(...) Korn shell extended operator is only available in bash when you turn the extglob option on (it is off by default).



You may have extglob turned on in your interactive shell via ~/.bashrc or other initialization file, but notice that those files are not sourced when running scripts, and that option is not inherited from the calling shell (unless the BASHOPTS variable in the environment, but it would be a bad idea to have it there).



Explicitly turning it on with



shopt -s extglob


at the beginning of your script should work.



Notice that the shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line which wasn't already parsed. This means that you cannot use shopt -s extglob like set -f, to only turn the extended patterns on in a subshell:



# this won't work
(
shopt -s extglob
echo !(no such file)
)


You'd have to do something like:



(
shopt -s extglob
eval 'echo !(no such file)'
)





share|improve this answer















The !(...) Korn shell extended operator is only available in bash when you turn the extglob option on (it is off by default).



You may have extglob turned on in your interactive shell via ~/.bashrc or other initialization file, but notice that those files are not sourced when running scripts, and that option is not inherited from the calling shell (unless the BASHOPTS variable in the environment, but it would be a bad idea to have it there).



Explicitly turning it on with



shopt -s extglob


at the beginning of your script should work.



Notice that the shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line which wasn't already parsed. This means that you cannot use shopt -s extglob like set -f, to only turn the extended patterns on in a subshell:



# this won't work
(
shopt -s extglob
echo !(no such file)
)


You'd have to do something like:



(
shopt -s extglob
eval 'echo !(no such file)'
)






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 28 at 12:54









Stéphane Chazelas

320k57608979




320k57608979










answered May 27 at 10:02









mosvymosvy

12.4k11542




12.4k11542







  • 1





    @DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case $f##*/ in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    May 27 at 10:16












  • I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 28 at 8:40






  • 1





    That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 8:52











  • Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b2,3(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 9:19












  • Commenting on the latest edit, the final paragraph. I think I put it in a function (immediately before the place where I needed its functionality applied. Would that explain why it did not work? Because the function already got parsed as a whole?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 29 at 7:18












  • 1





    @DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case $f##*/ in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    May 27 at 10:16












  • I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 28 at 8:40






  • 1





    That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 8:52











  • Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b2,3(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 9:19












  • Commenting on the latest edit, the final paragraph. I think I put it in a function (immediately before the place where I needed its functionality applied. Would that explain why it did not work? Because the function already got parsed as a whole?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 29 at 7:18







1




1





@DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case $f##*/ in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

– Stéphane Chazelas
May 27 at 10:16






@DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case $f##*/ in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

– Stéphane Chazelas
May 27 at 10:16














I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

– Dean Kayton
May 28 at 8:40





I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

– Dean Kayton
May 28 at 8:40




1




1





That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

– mosvy
May 28 at 8:52





That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

– mosvy
May 28 at 8:52













Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b2,3(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

– mosvy
May 28 at 9:19






Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b2,3(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

– mosvy
May 28 at 9:19














Commenting on the latest edit, the final paragraph. I think I put it in a function (immediately before the place where I needed its functionality applied. Would that explain why it did not work? Because the function already got parsed as a whole?

– Dean Kayton
May 29 at 7:18





Commenting on the latest edit, the final paragraph. I think I put it in a function (immediately before the place where I needed its functionality applied. Would that explain why it did not work? Because the function already got parsed as a whole?

– Dean Kayton
May 29 at 7:18

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f521287%2ffile-globbing-pattern-example-behaves-differently-in-bash-script-than-it-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?