Break equation in partsaligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizeUsing split to break a long equationEquation line break upline break in equationLeft aligning equations without align characterAdjusting the width of a displaymath environmentList of equations, including equation contents and captionLine Break in Equation with Textbreak an equationBreak equation without amsmath

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

How to decline physical affection from a child whose parents are pressuring them?

How to split a string in two substrings of same length using bash?

Calling GPL'ed socket server inside Docker?

Is the decompression of compressed and encrypted data without decryption also theoretically impossible?

How bad would a partial hash leak be, realistically?

Implement Homestuck's Catenative Doomsday Dice Cascader

OOP demonstration in C++17 using a Pokémon

When writing an error prompt, should we end the sentence with a exclamation mark or a dot?

Whats the next step after commercial fusion reactors?

Building a road to escape Earth's gravity by making a pyramid on Antartica

How to make a setting relevant?

Payment instructions from HomeAway look fishy to me

What risks are there when you clear your cookies instead of logging off?

Company did not petition for visa in a timely manner. Is asking me to work from overseas, but wants me to take a paycut

Do manufacturers try make their components as close to ideal ones as possible?

Completing the square to find if quadratic form is positive definite.

Ancestor born in Bristol City workhouse?

What happens to foam insulation board after you pour concrete slab?

Java guess the number

Why does the Schrödinger equation work so well for the Hydrogen atom despite the relativistic boundary at the nucleus?

What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?

Why don’t airliners have temporary liveries?

Traffic law UK, pedestrians

Secure offsite backup, even in the case of hacker root access



Break equation in parts


aligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizeUsing split to break a long equationEquation line break upline break in equationLeft aligning equations without align characterAdjusting the width of a displaymath environmentList of equations, including equation contents and captionLine Break in Equation with Textbreak an equationBreak equation without amsmath













5















I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac1-zeta 2)(fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-
2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta
2P_t-1+fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-2(1+zeta )))bigr\
+frac(1-zeta )4Bigl(fracE_t-2m_t+(fraczeta 2)(E_t-2P_t-
1+P_t-2)(1+zeta ))Bigr) \
+fraczeta 4(Bigl((P_t-1+P_t-2)Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument


It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1





    )bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

    – David Carlisle
    May 27 at 7:34












  • I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

    – Andrew Swann
    May 27 at 8:18















5















I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac1-zeta 2)(fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-
2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta
2P_t-1+fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-2(1+zeta )))bigr\
+frac(1-zeta )4Bigl(fracE_t-2m_t+(fraczeta 2)(E_t-2P_t-
1+P_t-2)(1+zeta ))Bigr) \
+fraczeta 4(Bigl((P_t-1+P_t-2)Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument


It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1





    )bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

    – David Carlisle
    May 27 at 7:34












  • I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

    – Andrew Swann
    May 27 at 8:18













5












5








5


1






I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac1-zeta 2)(fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-
2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta
2P_t-1+fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-2(1+zeta )))bigr\
+frac(1-zeta )4Bigl(fracE_t-2m_t+(fraczeta 2)(E_t-2P_t-
1+P_t-2)(1+zeta ))Bigr) \
+fraczeta 4(Bigl((P_t-1+P_t-2)Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument


It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE
begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac1-zeta 2)(fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-
2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta
2P_t-1+fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-2(1+zeta )))bigr\
+frac(1-zeta )4Bigl(fracE_t-2m_t+(fraczeta 2)(E_t-2P_t-
1+P_t-2)(1+zeta ))Bigr) \
+fraczeta 4(Bigl((P_t-1+P_t-2)Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument


It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?







equations amsmath






share|improve this question









New contributor



Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 27 at 8:12









Andrew Swann

79.6k9140337




79.6k9140337






New contributor



Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked May 27 at 7:25









HenamHenam

965




965




New contributor



Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Henam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 1





    )bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

    – David Carlisle
    May 27 at 7:34












  • I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

    – Andrew Swann
    May 27 at 8:18












  • 1





    )bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

    – David Carlisle
    May 27 at 7:34












  • I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

    – Andrew Swann
    May 27 at 8:18







1




1





)bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34






)bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34














I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18





I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:



documentclassarticle
usepackage[showframe]geometry
usepackageamsmath, nccmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE

begindocument
vspace*2ex
beginmultline*
P_t=
mfrac12biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac1-zeta 2,fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta 2P_t-1 +fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-21+zetabiggr) \
+frac1-zeta 4,fracE_t-2m_t+fraczeta 2(E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)1+zeta +fraczeta 4(P_t-1+P_t-2)
endmultline*

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • Thanks, I got my mistake.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:48






  • 1





    I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

    – Mico
    May 27 at 10:57












  • Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

    – barbara beeton
    May 27 at 11:53











  • @barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

    – Bernard
    May 27 at 13:05


















4














I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE % expectations operator

begindocument
beginalign*
P_t
&=frac12(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac14frac1-zeta1+zeta
biggl[E_t-1m_t +frac1-zeta2zeta E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta (1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+fraczeta2P_t-1+fraczeta1+zeta P_t-2
+E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta2 (E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)biggr]
+frac14zeta (P_t-1+P_t-2)
endalign*
enddocument





share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

    – Henam
    May 27 at 11:25


















4














After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:



documentclassarticle
usepackagenccmath
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackageshowframe
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred

begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac1-zeta 2fracE_t-1m_t
+ mfrac1-zeta2zetaE_t-2m_t
+ mfraczeta(1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta1+zetaP_t-2
1+zetaBiggr) \
+ frac1-zeta4
fracE_t-2m_t + fraczeta2(E_t-2P_t-1
+ P_t-2)1+zeta
+ fraczeta 4Bigl(P_t-1+P_t-2Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument


enter image description here



(red lines indicate text borders)






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:47











  • I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

    – Mico
    May 27 at 11:19












  • @Mico, done! Thank you very much!

    – Zarko
    May 27 at 11:33











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Henam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492822%2fbreak-equation-in-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:



documentclassarticle
usepackage[showframe]geometry
usepackageamsmath, nccmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE

begindocument
vspace*2ex
beginmultline*
P_t=
mfrac12biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac1-zeta 2,fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta 2P_t-1 +fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-21+zetabiggr) \
+frac1-zeta 4,fracE_t-2m_t+fraczeta 2(E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)1+zeta +fraczeta 4(P_t-1+P_t-2)
endmultline*

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • Thanks, I got my mistake.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:48






  • 1





    I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

    – Mico
    May 27 at 10:57












  • Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

    – barbara beeton
    May 27 at 11:53











  • @barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

    – Bernard
    May 27 at 13:05















1














You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:



documentclassarticle
usepackage[showframe]geometry
usepackageamsmath, nccmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE

begindocument
vspace*2ex
beginmultline*
P_t=
mfrac12biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac1-zeta 2,fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta 2P_t-1 +fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-21+zetabiggr) \
+frac1-zeta 4,fracE_t-2m_t+fraczeta 2(E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)1+zeta +fraczeta 4(P_t-1+P_t-2)
endmultline*

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • Thanks, I got my mistake.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:48






  • 1





    I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

    – Mico
    May 27 at 10:57












  • Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

    – barbara beeton
    May 27 at 11:53











  • @barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

    – Bernard
    May 27 at 13:05













1












1








1







You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:



documentclassarticle
usepackage[showframe]geometry
usepackageamsmath, nccmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE

begindocument
vspace*2ex
beginmultline*
P_t=
mfrac12biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac1-zeta 2,fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta 2P_t-1 +fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-21+zetabiggr) \
+frac1-zeta 4,fracE_t-2m_t+fraczeta 2(E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)1+zeta +fraczeta 4(P_t-1+P_t-2)
endmultline*

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer













You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:



documentclassarticle
usepackage[showframe]geometry
usepackageamsmath, nccmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE

begindocument
vspace*2ex
beginmultline*
P_t=
mfrac12biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac1-zeta 2,fracE_t-1m_t+frac1-zeta 2zeta E_t-2m_t+fraczeta (1-zeta )2(1+zeta )E_t-2P_t-1+fraczeta 2P_t-1 +fraczeta 1+zeta P_t-21+zetabiggr) \
+frac1-zeta 4,fracE_t-2m_t+fraczeta 2(E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)1+zeta +fraczeta 4(P_t-1+P_t-2)
endmultline*

enddocument


enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 27 at 8:32









BernardBernard

180k780212




180k780212












  • Thanks, I got my mistake.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:48






  • 1





    I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

    – Mico
    May 27 at 10:57












  • Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

    – barbara beeton
    May 27 at 11:53











  • @barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

    – Bernard
    May 27 at 13:05

















  • Thanks, I got my mistake.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:48






  • 1





    I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

    – Mico
    May 27 at 10:57












  • Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

    – barbara beeton
    May 27 at 11:53











  • @barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

    – Bernard
    May 27 at 13:05
















Thanks, I got my mistake.

– Henam
May 27 at 9:48





Thanks, I got my mistake.

– Henam
May 27 at 9:48




1




1





I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

– Mico
May 27 at 10:57






I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperatorEE, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

– Mico
May 27 at 10:57














Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53





Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53













@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05





@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05











4














I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE % expectations operator

begindocument
beginalign*
P_t
&=frac12(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac14frac1-zeta1+zeta
biggl[E_t-1m_t +frac1-zeta2zeta E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta (1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+fraczeta2P_t-1+fraczeta1+zeta P_t-2
+E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta2 (E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)biggr]
+frac14zeta (P_t-1+P_t-2)
endalign*
enddocument





share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

    – Henam
    May 27 at 11:25















4














I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE % expectations operator

begindocument
beginalign*
P_t
&=frac12(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac14frac1-zeta1+zeta
biggl[E_t-1m_t +frac1-zeta2zeta E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta (1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+fraczeta2P_t-1+fraczeta1+zeta P_t-2
+E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta2 (E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)biggr]
+frac14zeta (P_t-1+P_t-2)
endalign*
enddocument





share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

    – Henam
    May 27 at 11:25













4












4








4







I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE % expectations operator

begindocument
beginalign*
P_t
&=frac12(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac14frac1-zeta1+zeta
biggl[E_t-1m_t +frac1-zeta2zeta E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta (1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+fraczeta2P_t-1+fraczeta1+zeta P_t-2
+E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta2 (E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)biggr]
+frac14zeta (P_t-1+P_t-2)
endalign*
enddocument





share|improve this answer













I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorEE % expectations operator

begindocument
beginalign*
P_t
&=frac12(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac14frac1-zeta1+zeta
biggl[E_t-1m_t +frac1-zeta2zeta E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta (1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+fraczeta2P_t-1+fraczeta1+zeta P_t-2
+E_t-2m_t\
&quad +fraczeta2 (E_t-2P_t-1+P_t-2)biggr]
+frac14zeta (P_t-1+P_t-2)
endalign*
enddocument






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 27 at 11:23









MicoMico

293k32402791




293k32402791







  • 1





    That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

    – Henam
    May 27 at 11:25












  • 1





    That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

    – Henam
    May 27 at 11:25







1




1





That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

– Henam
May 27 at 11:25





That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

– Henam
May 27 at 11:25











4














After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:



documentclassarticle
usepackagenccmath
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackageshowframe
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred

begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac1-zeta 2fracE_t-1m_t
+ mfrac1-zeta2zetaE_t-2m_t
+ mfraczeta(1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta1+zetaP_t-2
1+zetaBiggr) \
+ frac1-zeta4
fracE_t-2m_t + fraczeta2(E_t-2P_t-1
+ P_t-2)1+zeta
+ fraczeta 4Bigl(P_t-1+P_t-2Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument


enter image description here



(red lines indicate text borders)






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:47











  • I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

    – Mico
    May 27 at 11:19












  • @Mico, done! Thank you very much!

    – Zarko
    May 27 at 11:33















4














After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:



documentclassarticle
usepackagenccmath
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackageshowframe
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred

begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac1-zeta 2fracE_t-1m_t
+ mfrac1-zeta2zetaE_t-2m_t
+ mfraczeta(1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta1+zetaP_t-2
1+zetaBiggr) \
+ frac1-zeta4
fracE_t-2m_t + fraczeta2(E_t-2P_t-1
+ P_t-2)1+zeta
+ fraczeta 4Bigl(P_t-1+P_t-2Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument


enter image description here



(red lines indicate text borders)






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:47











  • I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

    – Mico
    May 27 at 11:19












  • @Mico, done! Thank you very much!

    – Zarko
    May 27 at 11:33













4












4








4







After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:



documentclassarticle
usepackagenccmath
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackageshowframe
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred

begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac1-zeta 2fracE_t-1m_t
+ mfrac1-zeta2zetaE_t-2m_t
+ mfraczeta(1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta1+zetaP_t-2
1+zetaBiggr) \
+ frac1-zeta4
fracE_t-2m_t + fraczeta2(E_t-2P_t-1
+ P_t-2)1+zeta
+ fraczeta 4Bigl(P_t-1+P_t-2Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument


enter image description here



(red lines indicate text borders)






share|improve this answer















After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:



documentclassarticle
usepackagenccmath
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackageshowframe
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred

begindocument
beginmultline*
P_t=
frac12Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac1-zeta 2fracE_t-1m_t
+ mfrac1-zeta2zetaE_t-2m_t
+ mfraczeta(1-zeta)2(1+zeta)E_t-2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta2P_t-1
+ mfraczeta1+zetaP_t-2
1+zetaBiggr) \
+ frac1-zeta4
fracE_t-2m_t + fraczeta2(E_t-2P_t-1
+ P_t-2)1+zeta
+ fraczeta 4Bigl(P_t-1+P_t-2Bigr)
endmultline*
enddocument


enter image description here



(red lines indicate text borders)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 27 at 11:32

























answered May 27 at 8:20









ZarkoZarko

136k872180




136k872180












  • Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:47











  • I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

    – Mico
    May 27 at 11:19












  • @Mico, done! Thank you very much!

    – Zarko
    May 27 at 11:33

















  • Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:47











  • I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

    – Mico
    May 27 at 11:19












  • @Mico, done! Thank you very much!

    – Zarko
    May 27 at 11:33
















Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

– Henam
May 27 at 9:47





Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

– Henam
May 27 at 9:47













I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

– Mico
May 27 at 11:19






I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

– Mico
May 27 at 11:19














@Mico, done! Thank you very much!

– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33





@Mico, done! Thank you very much!

– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33










Henam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Henam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Henam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Henam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492822%2fbreak-equation-in-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







L,77yBxeQ5Me,dcS QgqPhDF
qMD1GpBkq SWsWJ1jzFPN2QlB3hViyhaY94 D582cP YzzijVXKghYllkoOnJg te5 9G30gOMGuP,jHyE5M aovGMO 6ws1r6Q

Popular posts from this blog

Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?